1דwriting Hebrew

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Writing Hebrew ד1 Reading Biblical Hebrew Chapter 1: Consonants John C. Beckman 2016-08-08 Goal: Learn to Write the Hebrew Alefbet 2 General comments • Stroke order and direction are suggested but optional. • Precise letter shapes are optional. • Only certain features are required (e.g., foot on nun) • All letters are full height, unless otherwise noted. Dot (Dagesh or Mappiq) is shown with all letters. • It is not part of the letters. • Don’t add it when writing the alefbet. • Chapter 3 discusses when the dot is added. • It is shown now so that you know where it goes. 3 א ל ָ֫ ָ֫ ף Alef 1 2 3 4 בֵּ ית Bet 1 2 כ from Kaf ב Bump on lower right distinguishes Bet 5 ג ימֵּ ל Gimel Optional hook 1 in top left 2 6 ד לת Dalet 1 2 ר from Resh ד Bump on upper right distinguishes Dalet 7 הֵּ א He 1 2 ח from ḥet ה Gap in upper left distinguishes he 8 וו Vav Optional hook in top left 1 .extends below . ן is half height. Final nun י is full height. Yod ו Vav 9 ז ין Zayin 1 2 ו from vav ז Bump on upper right distinguishes zayin 10 חֵּ ית Ḥet 1 2 ה from he ח Lack of gap in upper left distinguishes ḥet 11 טֵּ ית Tet 1 12 יֹוד Yod Optional hook in top left 1 .is full height ו is half height. Vav י Yod .extends below the baseline . ן Final nun 13 כף Kaf 1 ב from bet כ Round lower right distinguishes kaf 14 כ ףָ֫סֹופית Final Kaf 1 Alternately, final kaf can be a single curved line 2 ן from final nun . ך Full-width upper line distinguishes final kaf 15 ל מד Lamed 1 Lamed has an antenna that goes above the top line 16 מֵּ ם Mem 2 1 17 מֵָּ֫ם סֹופית Final Mem 1 ס from samekh . ם Square bottom distinguishes final mem 18 נּון Nun 1 19 נּון סֹופית Final Nun 1 Optional hook in top left .is half height י does not. Yod ו extends below the base line. Vav . ן Final nun 20 ס מ ְך Samekh Optional hook at top left 1 ם from final mem ס Round bottom distinguishes samekh 21 ע ין Ayin 2 1 צ from tsadi . ע Smooth lower right distinguishes ayin 22 פֵּ א Pe 1 23 פֵָּ֫א סֹופית Final Pe 1 extends below the base line . ף Final pe 24 צ די Tsadi 1 2 ע from ayin צ Bump on lower right distinguishes tsadi 25 צ ד יָ֫סֹופית Final Tsadi 1 2 .extends below the base line . ץ Final tsadi 26 קֹוף Qof 1 2 .extends below the base line ק Qof 27 רֵּ יׁש Resh 1 ד from dalet ר Smooth upper right distinguishes resh 28 שין Sin 3 2 1 ׁש from shin ש Dot above upper left distinguishes sin 29 ׁשין Shin 2 3 1 ש from sin ׁש Dot above upper right distinguishes shin 30 תו Tav 1 2 ח from ḥet ת Foot on lower left distinguishes tav .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Hebrew Alphabet
BBH2 Textbook Supplement Chapter 1 – The Hebrew Alphabet 1 The following comments explain, provide mnemonics for, answer questions that students have raised about, and otherwise supplement the second edition of Basics of Biblical Hebrew by Pratico and Van Pelt. Chapter 1 – The Hebrew Alphabet 1.1 The consonants For begadkephat letters (§1.5), the pronunciation in §1.1 is the pronunciation with the Dagesh Lene (§1.5), even though the Dagesh Lene is not shown in §1.1. .Kaf” has an “off” sound“ כ The name It looks like open mouth coughing or a cup of coffee on its side. .Qof” is pronounced with either an “oh” sound or an “oo” sound“ ק The name It has a circle (like the letter “o” inside it). Also, it is transliterated with the letter q, and it looks like a backwards q. here are different wa s of spellin the na es of letters. lef leph leˉ There are many different ways to write the consonants. See below (page 3) for a table of examples. See my chapter 1 overheads for suggested letter shapes, stroke order, and the keys to distinguishing similar-looking letters. ”.having its dot on the left: “Sin is never ri ht ׂש Mnemonic for Sin ׁש and Shin ׂש Order of Sin ׁש before Shin ׂש Our textbook and Biblical Hebrew lexicons put Sin Some alphabet songs on YouTube reverse the order of Sin and Shin. Modern Hebrew dictionaries, the acrostic poems in the Bible, and ancient abecedaries (inscriptions in which someone wrote the alphabet) all treat Sin and Shin as the same letter.
[Show full text]
ב Bet ה Heh ו Vav ט Tet י Yod ך מ Mem ם
Exercise 1A: Writing the Hebrew Square Script Using the examples at the right, practice writing out the Hebrew characters on the lines provided for you. Be sure to accurately reflect the position of the letter in relation to the base line. Boxes are used to indicate final forms. Letter Name aleph א aleph bet ב bet gimel ג gimel dalet ד dalet heh ה heh vav ו vav zayin ז zayin .het ח ḥet tet ט tet yod י kaph כ yod ך kaph final kaph lamed ל mem מ lamed ם mem 3 Exercise 1A: Writing tHe Hebrew SquAre Script final mem Letter Name nun נ ן nun final nun samek ס samek ayin ע pe פ ayin ף pe final pe tsade צ ץ tsade final tsade qoph ק qoph resh ר resh שׂ sin sin shin ׁש shin tav ת tav NAme: __________________________________________________ Exercise 1A: Writing tHe Hebrew SquAre Script 4 Exercise 1B: Reading Proper Names In this exercise you will practice identifying the Hebrew consonants by reading familiar proper names. Write the English name in the space to the left of the Hebrew name. Since the alphabet has no vowels, you will have to provide vowel sounds to recognize each word. Start by trying an “a” vowel between each con- sonant. The “a” vowel is the most common vowel in Hebrew and, while it will not always be the correct one, it should help you recognize these names. לבן Laban יעקב אסתר אברהם עבדיה יצחק יחזקאל יׂשראל דוד רבקה נחמיה נבכדנאזר ירבעם ירדן מרדכי מׁשה דברה גלית יׁשמעאל עׂשו 5 Exercise 1B: ReAding Proper NAmes Exercise 1C: Hebrew Cursive (Optional) Using the examples shown, practice writing out the cursive Hebrew characters on the lines provided for you.
[Show full text]
The Tiberian Pronunciation Tradition of Biblical Hebrew, Volume 2
Cambridge Semitic Languages and Cultures The Tiberian Pronunciation Khan Tradition of Biblical Hebrew (Vol. II) The Tiberian Pronunciation Geoffrey Khan Tradition of Biblical Hebrew The form of Biblical Hebrew that is presented in printed edi� ons, with vocaliza� on and accent signs, has its origin in medieval manuscripts of the Bible. The vocaliza� on and Tradition of Biblical Hebrew Vol. II Volume II accent signs are nota� on systems that were created in Tiberias in the early Islamic period by scholars known as the Tiberian Masoretes, but the oral tradi� on they represent has roots in an� quity. The gramma� cal textbooks and reference grammars of Biblical Hebrew The Tiberian Pronunciation in use today are heirs to centuries of tradi� on of gramma� cal works on Biblical Hebrew in GEOFFREY KHAN Europe. The paradox is that this European tradi� on of Biblical Hebrew grammar did not have direct access to the way the Tiberian Masoretes were pronouncing Biblical Hebrew. In the last few decades, research of manuscript sources from the medieval Middle East has made it possible to reconstruct with considerable accuracy the pronuncia� on of the Tiberian Masoretes, which has come to be known as the ‘Tiberian pronuncia� on tradi� on’. This book presents the current state of knowledge of the Tiberian pronuncia� on tradi� on of Biblical Hebrew and a full edi� on of one of the key medieval sources, Hidāyat al-Qāriʾ ‘The Guide for the Reader’, by ʾAbū al-Faraj Hārūn. It is hoped that the book will help to break the mould of current gramma� cal descrip� ons of Biblical Hebrew and form a bridge between modern tradi� ons of grammar and the school of the Masoretes of Tiberias.
[Show full text]
A Critique of L2/18-276
A Critique of L2/18-276 Abe Meyers* November 30, 2018 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Multiple incompatible representations 2 2.1 <gimel-daleth-yodh> + <shin> vs <aleph-heth> + <aleph-heth> 3 2.2 <Fixed-aleph> + <gimel-daleth-yodh> vs <fixed-gimel-daleth-yodth> + <aleph> ............................. 3 2.3 <gimel-daleth-yodth> + <gimel-daleth> vs <samekh> . 3 2.4 <pe> vs <sadhe> ......................... 4 3 Miscellaneous issues 4 3.1 Joining of <aleph-heth> ..................... 5 3.2 Missing alternate form of <gimel-daleth-yodh> . 5 3.3 Inclusion of <HE> ......................... 5 3.4 Joining of <zayin> ........................ 5 3.5 Old lamedth . 5 4 The dogma of shape-shifting and the problem of good-enough 5 5 Bibliography 6 1 Introduction It has been a source of delight that after a dormant period of four years, since the submission of my proposal to encode Book Pahlavi in the Unicode *abraham.meyers AT orientology DOT ca 1 standard, there has been some renewed activity in the community. The recent preliminary proposal by Dr. Anshuman Pandey (L2/18-276) might therefore signal a resurgence of activities towards the noble goal of encoding of Book Pahlavi in the Unicode standard. I started reading the work of Dr. Pandey with enthusiasm and in antic- ipation of further improvement and suggestions and perhaps discovery of new characters. It was indeed pleasant to see a relatively thorough classica- tion of the visual joining of the stem of the characters of Book Pahlavi, while taking the base-line into consideration. Such studies will be very benecial for the future type designers of Book Pahlavialthough I have doubts about the applicability of this study to the level of abstraction pertaining to the Unicode standard.
[Show full text]
Other Marks .א3
Other Marks .א3 Reading Biblical Hebrew Chapter 3: Other Marks John C. Beckman 2016-08-29 Goal: Prepare to Memorize the Other Marks 2 Other marks • Everything other than consonants and vowels Be able to • Symbol name and meaning • Name symbol and meaning Caveat: We will cover specific accents later Not Part of the Original Manuscripts 3 The original texts had only consonants (including vowel letters) • Vowel letters (using consonants) began in 900 BC • No regular vowels, accents, or other marks Vowels, accents, and other marks began in post-biblical period • Consider them an early, generally reliable commentary. • Like breathing marks and accents in the Greek NT iff = If and Only If 4 Compact notation Example: • Dagesh has meaning iff it is preceded by a vowel, not shva • Every dagesh that is preceded by a vowel has meaning. • Every dagesh that is not preceded by a vowel is meaningless. is Consonantal 5 ה Indicates Word-Final He ַמִּפיק Mappiq is a vowel letter iff word-final ה He ָהְיָתהִּ יְהֶיה ִּ הֵּנהֹּכה is a vowel letter ה Word-final • ,elsewhere is always a consonant ה • הָ אָ ֶ רץ א ִּהֹלהים never a vowel letter ?ה What if a word needs to end in a he אֹּתָ ּה ה Put a dot inside the word-final • ַמִּפיק Mappiq • Means ‘Dot’ 6 דָ גֵּׁש Dagesh • Dot inside the consonant (or to the left if there is no ‘inside’) ה Looks like mappiq, but not in a word-final he • • ּב ּג ד ּוּזּטּיכ ּל ּמ נ ּס פ ּצ ּק ּׂש ּׁש ּת and resh (אהחע) Dagesh in all consonants except gutturals • to a point-like sound בכפ Dagesh changes the sound of • Dagesh Doubles Consonant IFF Preceded by Vowel, not Shva 7 בכפ Dagesh always changes the pronunciation of ְכ ֶנְג דֹו Meaningless dagesh • Multiple categories and names • Dagesh qal (‘light dagesh’), dagesh lene • Conjunctive dagesh, … (בכפ Ignore it (other than pronouncing • ַו ְּת ַ דּבֵּ ר Meaningful dagesh • Doubles the consonant • Has meaning.
[Show full text]
Page 1 CHAPTER EIGHTEEN on INFIĀL and IFTIĀL These Two Verb
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN ON INFIʿĀL AND IFTIʿĀL These two verb types are intransitive. Conjugational patterns of .הִבָנֵה ,הִשָׁחֵט ,הִמָלֵט ,.the type of inʿāl do not contain a taw, e.g A conjugational pattern of the type of iftiʿāl has a taw that nev- -The taw of iftiʿāl does not oc .הִתְאַמֵץ ,הִתְמַכֵר er disappears, as in cur between radicals, unless the #rst radical is a samekh, a ṣadi or a shin. Other letters do not come before the taw, as do samekh, ,(Micah 6:16) וישתמר חקות עמרי ,(Eccl. 12:5) ויסתבל החגב ,.ṣadi and shin, e.g and similar cases. An exception to this is one word beginning in a -Jer. 49:3), in which the taw occurs be) והתשוטטנה בגדרות ,shin, namely fore the shin. As for ṣadi, they said that the people of the lan- guage substituted a ṭet for the taw after the ṣadi in order to ease ומה ,(Josh. 9:4) וילכו ויצטירו ,(Josh. 9:12) חם הצטידנו אותו ,.pronunciation, e.g .(Gen. 44:16) נצטדק Take note that the taw of iftiʿāl cannot be confused with the fu- ture pre#x taw, because the taw of iftiʿāl is stable in the entire paradigm, but the future pre#x taw is not. Moreover, the vocali- sation of the taw of iftiʿāl is a shewa in all cases when it does not occur between the #rst and the second radical. But the pre#xes can be vocalised with a shewa or other vowels. Moreover, a א֗ ֗ י ֗ נ ת֗ word can never begin in the taw of iftiʿāl, but another letter must come before it, be it a heh, a mem, or a future pre#x.
[Show full text]
Adaptations of Hebrew Script -Mala Enciklopedija Prosvetq I978 [Small Prosveta Encyclopedia]
726 PART X: USE AND ADAPTATION OF SCRIPTS Series Minor 8) The Hague: Mouton SECTION 6I Ly&in, V. I t952. Drevnepermskij jazyk [The Old Pemic language] Moscow: Izdalel'slvo Aka- demii Nauk SSSR ry6r. Komi-russkij sLovar' [Komi-Russian diclionary] Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe Izda- tel'slvo Inostrannyx i Nacional'nyx Slovuej. Adaptations of Hebrew Script -MaLa Enciklopedija Prosvetq I978 [Small Prosveta encycloPedia]. Belgrade. Moll, T. A,, & P. I InEnlikdj t951. Cukotsko-russkij sLovaf [Chukchee-Russian dicrionary] Len- BENJAMIN HARY ingrad: Gosudtrstvemoe udebno-pedagogideskoe izdatel'stvo Ministerstva Prosveldenija RSFSR Poppe, Nicholas. 1963 Tatqr Manual (Indima Universily Publications, Uralic atrd Altaic Series 25) Mouton Bloomington: Indiana University; The Hague: "lagguages" rgjo. Mongolian lnnguage Handbook.Washington, D C.: Center for Applied Linguistics Jewish or ethnolects HerbertH Papet(Intema- Rastorgueva,V.S. 1963.A ShortSketchofTajikGrammar, fans anded It is probably impossible to offer a purely linguistic definition of a Jewish "language," tional Joumal ofAmerican Linguisticr 29, no part 2) Bloominglon: Indiana University; The - 4, as it is difficult to find many cornmon linguistic criteria that can apply to Judeo- Hague: Moulon. (Russiu orig 'Kratkij oderk grammatiki lad;ikskogo jzyka," in M. V. Rax- Arabic, Judeo-Spanish, and Yiddish, for example. Consequently, a sociolinguistic imi & L V Uspenskaja, eds,Tadiikskurusstj slovar' lTajik-Russian dictionary], Moscow: Gosudustvennoe Izdatel'stvo Inostrmyx i Nacional'tryx SIovarej, r954 ) definition with a more suitable term, such as ethnolect, is in order. An ethnolect is an Sjoberg, Andr€e P. t963. Uzbek StructuraL Grammar (Indiana University Publications, Uralic and independent linguistic entity with its own history and development that refers to a lan- Altaic Series r8).
[Show full text]
How Was the Dageš in Biblical Hebrew Pronounced and Why Is It There? Geoffrey Khan
1 pronounced and why is it בָּתִּ ים How was the dageš in Biblical Hebrew there? Geoffrey Khan houses’ is generally presented as an enigma in‘ בָּתִּ ים The dageš in the Biblical Hebrew plural form descriptions of the language. A wide variety of opinions about it have been expressed in Biblical Hebrew textbooks, reference grammars and the scholarly literature, but many of these are speculative without any direct or comparative evidence. One of the aims of this article is to examine the evidence for the way the dageš was pronounced in this word in sources that give us direct access to the Tiberian Masoretic reading tradition. A second aim is to propose a reason why the word has a dageš on the basis of comparative evidence within Biblical Hebrew reading traditions and other Semitic languages. בָּתִּיםבָּתִּ ים The Pronunciation of the Dageš in .1.0 The Tiberian vocalization signs and accents were created by the Masoretes of Tiberias in the early Islamic period to record an oral tradition of reading. There is evidence that this reading tradition had its roots in the Second Temple period, although some features of it appear to have developed at later periods. 1 The Tiberian reading was regarded in the Middle Ages as the most prestigious and authoritative tradition. On account of the authoritative status of the reading, great efforts were made by the Tiberian Masoretes to fix the tradition in a standardized form. There remained, nevertheless, some degree of variation in reading and sign notation in the Tiberian Masoretic school. By the end of the Masoretic period in the 10 th century C.E.
[Show full text]
Revised Proposal to Encode Old Uyghur in Unicode
L2/19-016 2019-01-07 Revised proposal to encode Old Uyghur in Unicode Anshuman Pandey [email protected] January 7, 2019 Document History This proposal is a revision of the following: • L2/18-126: “Preliminary proposal to encode Old Uyghur in Unicode” • L2/18-333: “Proposal to encode Old Uyghur in Unicode” It incorporates comments made by the UTC Script Ad Hoc Committee and other experts in: • L2/18-168: “Recommendations to UTC #155 April-May 2018 on Script Proposals” • L2/18-335: “Comments on the preliminary proposal to encode Old Uyghur in Unicode (L2/18-126)” The major changes to L2/18-333 are as follows: • Correction to glyphs for initial and medial beth, previously shown erroneously using forms for yodh • Revision of glyphs for aleph and nun to reflect distinctive forms from the 9th century • Revision of representative glyph for zayin for stylistic uniformity • Unification of gimel and heth into a single letter, and addition of a letter for final heth • Addition of an alternate form letter for both aleph and nun • Expansion of description of the orientation of terminals for specific letters A previous version of this proposal was reviewed by the following expert: • Dai Matsui (Graduate School of Letters, Osaka University) 1 Revised proposal to encode Old Uyghur in Unicode Anshuman Pandey 1 Introduction The ‘Old Uyghur’ script was used between the 8th and 17th centuries primarily in the Tarim Basin of Central Asia, located in present-day Xinjiang, China. It is a cursive-joining alphabet with features of an abjad, and is characterized by its vertical orientation.
[Show full text]
Old Phrygian Inscriptions from Gordion: Toward A
OLD PHRYGIAN INSCRIPTIONSFROM GORDION: TOWARD A HISTORY OF THE PHRYGIAN ALPHABET1 (PLATES 67-74) JR HRYYSCarpenter's discussion in 1933 of the date of the Greektakeover of the Phoenician alphabet 2 stimulated a good deal of comment at the time, most of it attacking his late dating of the event.3 Some of the attacks were ill-founded and have been refuted.4 But with the passage of time Carpenter's modification of his original thesis, putting back the date of the takeover from the last quarter to the middle of the eighth century, has quietly gained wide acceptance.5 The excavations of Sir Leonard Woolley in 1936-37 at Al Mina by the mouth of the Orontes River have turned up evidence for a permanent Greek trading settle- ment of the eighth century before Christ, situated in a Semitic-speaking and a Semitic- writing land-a bilingual environment which Carpenter considered essential for the transmission of alphabetic writing from a Semitic- to a Greek-speakingpeople. Thus to Carpenter's date of ca. 750 B.C. there has been added a place which would seem to fulfill the conditions necessary for such a takeover, perhaps only one of a series of Greek settlements on the Levantine coast.6 The time, around 750 B.C., the required 1The fifty-one inscriptions presented here include eight which have appeared in Gordion preliminary reports. It is perhaps well (though repetitive) that all the Phrygian texts appear together in one place so that they may be conveniently available to those interested. A few brief Phrygian inscriptions which add little or nothing to the corpus are omitted here.
[Show full text]
Beginning Biblical Hebrew
Beginning Biblical Hebrew Beginning Biblical Hebrew Mark D. Futato Winona Lake, Indiana Eisenbrauns 2003 ç Copyright 2003 by Mark D. Futato. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Futato, Mark David Beginning Biblical Hebrew / Mark D. Futato. p. cm. ISBN 1-57506-022-1 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Hebrew language—Grammar. I. Title. PJ4567.3.F88 2003 492.4u82421—dc21 2003054970 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. †‘ 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 To my wife, Adele Many women do noble things, but you surpass them all. (Proverbs 31:30 [29]) Wnl: alø hw;hy] Wnl: alø d/bK: ˆTE Úm}v¥l}AyKI ÚT<mIa“Al[" ÚD]s}j"Al[" (Psalm 115:1) CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xi 1. THE ALPHABET . 1 2. THE VOWELS . 7 3. SYLLABLES, SHEVA, AND STRONG DAGESH . 13 4. THE NOUN: BASIC FORMS . 18 5. PRONOUNS AND THE DEFINITE ARTICLE . 24 6. THE VERB: QAL PERFECT . 29 7. SENTENCES WITH VERBS . 36 8. THE NOUN: VOWEL CHANGES . 42 9. PREPOSITIONS AND VAV CONJUNCTION . 49 10. THE ADJECTIVE . 56 11. THE VERB: QAL IMPERFECT . 63 12. CONSTRUCT RELATIONSHIP: SINGULAR . 68 13. CONSTRUCT RELATIONSHIP: PLURAL . 75 14. QAL PERFECT AND IMPERFECT: WEAK ROOTS . 81 15. QAL PERFECT AND IMPERFECT: I NUN AND III HEY .
[Show full text]
Restoring Hebrew Diacritics Without a Dictionary
ACL-IJCNLP 2021 Submission 2830. Confidential Review Copy. DO NOT DISTRIBUTE. 000 050 001 Restoring Hebrew Diacritics Without a Dictionary 051 002 052 003 053 004 054 005 Anonymous ACL-IJCNLP submission 055 006 056 007 057 008 058 009 059 010 060 011 Abstract 061 062 המטוס נחת ברכות! 012 (a) hamatos naxat ???? 013 We demonstrate that it is feasible to diacritize 063 ‘The plane landed (unspecified)’ 014 Hebrew script without any human-curated re- 064 הַמָּטוֹס Éחַת בְּר¯כּוּת! sources other than plain diacritized text. We 015 065 present NAKDIMON, a two-layer character- (b) hamatos naxat b-rakut 016 level LSTM, that performs on par with ‘The plane landed softly’ 066 017 067 הַמָּטוֹס Éחַת בְּר´כוֹת! much more complicated curation-dependent 018 systems, across a diverse array of modern He- 068 (c) hamatos naxat braxot brew sources. 019 ‘The plane landed congratulations’ 069 020 1 Introduction 070 021 Table 1: An example of an undotted Hebrew text (a) 071 022 The vast majority of modern Hebrew texts are writ- (written right to left) which can be interpreted in at least 072 023 ten in a letter-only version of the Hebrew script, two different ways (b,c), dotted and pronounced differ- 073 ently, but only (b) makes grammatical sense. 024 one which omits the diacritics present in the full di- 074 1 025 acritized, or dotted variant. Since most vowels are 075 encoded via diacritics, the pronunciation of words 026 dotted text. Obtaining such data is not trivial, even 076 in the text is left underspecified, and a considerable 027 given correct pronunciation: the standard Tiberian 077 mass of tokens becomes ambiguous.
[Show full text]