45° Marcialonga, I-Predazzo 2018 (Classifica Ufficiosa) (91

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

45° Marcialonga, I-Predazzo 2018 (Classifica Ufficiosa) (91 data: 09.02.18 45° Marcialonga, I-Predazzo 2018 (classifica ufficiosa) orario: 10:37:54 pagina: 1 (91) MASCHILE 70KM (70 km Ufficiosa) (Lampogas Final Climb) posto cognome e nome anno nazione/località squadra tempo distacco km/h pett 1. CHERNOUSOV Ilya 1986 RUS-MOSCOW RUSSIA 8.21,3 ------ 17,953 20 2. BERDAL Tore Bjoerseth 1988 NOR-TRONDHEIM NORVEGIA 8.23,7 0.02,4 17,867 13 3. PEDERSEN Morten Eide 1987 NOR-LILLEHAMMER NORVEGIA 8.25,8 0.04,5 17,793 9 4. GJERDALEN Tord Asle 1983 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 8.30,9 0.09,6 17,615 1 5. VOKUEV Ermil 1992 RUS-SAINT PETERSBURG RUSSIA 8.34,8 0.13,5 17,482 102 6. NYGAARD Andreas 1990 NOR-STRAUMEN NORVEGIA 8.35,7 0.14,4 17,452 3 7. JOHANSSON Marcus 1990 SWE-ULRICEHAMN SVEZIA 8.41,0 0.19,7 17,274 42 8. AUKLAND Anders 1972 NOR-LOMMEDALEN NORVEGIA 8.42,0 0.20,7 17,241 2 9. KARLSSON Anton 1990 SWE-STOCKHOLM SVEZIA 8.49,5 0.28,2 16,997 39 10. FJELD Oeyvind Moen 1988 NOR-XXX NORVEGIA 8.49,6 0.28,3 16,993 12 11. OESTENSEN Simen Haakon 1984 NOR-HOSLE NORVEGIA 8.50,5 0.29,2 16,965 8 12. HOELGAARD Stian 1991 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 8.52,2 0.30,9 16,910 5 13. JOHNSSON Jimmie 1985 SWE-FALUN SVEZIA 8.54,3 0.33,0 16,844 41 14. JEANNEROD Alexis 1991 FRA-XX FRANCIA 9.02,6 0.41,3 16,586 19 15. KOSKELA Niko 1990 FIN-HELSINKI FINLANDIA 9.08,2 0.46,9 16,417 37 16. REZAC Stanislav 1973 CZE-HODKOVICE N. MOH. REPUBBLICA CECA 9.08,7 0.47,4 16,402 4 17. BYSTROEM Fredrik 1982 SWE-ORSA SVEZIA 9.12,3 0.51,0 16,295 40 18. HOLMBERG Andreas 1992 SWE-XX SVEZIA 9.12,8 0.51,5 16,280 16 19. TYNELL Rikard 1986 SWE-FALUN SVEZIA 9.14,4 0.53,1 16,233 28 20. NIEMI-IMPOLA Bob 1992 SWE-XX SVEZIA 9.18,6 0.57,3 16,111 17 21. VESTERHEIM Magnus 1994 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 9.18,7 0.57,4 16,108 60 22. ERIKSSON Jens 1987 SWE-DALA-JARNA SVEZIA 9.20,0 0.58,7 16,071 27 23. DAMMEN Kjetil Hagtvedt 1983 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 9.26,3 1.05,0 15,892 23 24. HERMO Runar 1990 NOR-TROMSO NORVEGIA 9.27,5 1.06,2 15,859 69 25. OTTOSSON Markus 1986 SWE-Sweden SVEZIA 9.28,9 1.07,6 15,820 43 26. NORDLI Simen Engebretsen 1991 NOR-VANG NORVEGIA 9.29,2 1.07,9 15,811 61 27. PERSSON Oscar 1992 SWE-XX SVEZIA 9.30,5 1.09,2 15,775 44 28. MATHISEN Runar Skaug 1993 NOR-XX NORVEGIA 9.32,4 1.11,1 15,723 72 29. STUPAK Nikita 1987 RUS-SAINT PETERSBURG RUSSIA 9.34,4 1.13,1 15,668 101 30. VINJE Vegard 1991 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 9.39,2 1.17,9 15,538 78 31. PLISKA Jiri 1981 CZE-LIBEREC REPUBBLICA CECA 9.41,6 1.20,3 15,474 30 32. BRINK Joergen 1974 SWE-ULRICEHAMN SVEZIA 9.42,2 1.20,9 15,458 32 33. JESPERSEN Chris Andre 1983 NOR-TRONDHEIM NORVEGIA 9.46,9 1.25,6 15,334 103 33. THYGESEN Torgeir Skare 1989 NOR-XX NORVEGIA 9.46,9 1.25,6 15,334 25 35. THELE Joar Andreas 1993 NOR-LYSAKER NORVEGIA 9.54,0 1.32,7 15,151 76 36. BRIGADOI Mauro 1992 ITA-PREDAZZO TEAM TRENTINO ROBINSON TRAINER 9.55,6 1.34,3 15,110 53 36. THYLI Vetle 1989 NOR-RAUFOSS NORVEGIA 9.55,6 1.34,3 15,110 83 38. NILSSON Klas 1986 SWE-SKELLEFTEA SVEZIA 10.03,0 1.41,7 14,925 66 39. BAUER Lukas 1977 CZE-BOZI DAR REPUBBLICA CECA 10.03,6 1.42,3 14,910 22 40. TYROM Kjetil 1995 NOR-FOLLEBU NORVEGIA 10.05,1 1.43,8 14,873 59 41. LAMPINEN Antti 1983 FIN-MIKKELI FINLANDIA 10.05,3 1.44,0 14,868 92 42. GIFSTAD Thomas 1992 NOR-XXX NORVEGIA 10.06,6 1.45,3 14,836 51 43. SOLLIE Henrik 1975 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 10.16,9 1.55,6 14,589 133 44. DEBERTOLIS Bruno 1978 ITA-TRANSACQUA TEAM TRENTINO ROBINSON TRAINER 10.20,3 1.59,0 14,509 52 45. MICH Riccardo 1991 ITA-TESERO TEAM FUTURA 10.23,7 2.02,4 14,430 114 46. GOEBEL Florian 1972 GER-WILLINGEN GERMANIA 10.24,7 2.03,4 14,406 94 47. BOSIN Simone 1991 ITA-MASI DI CAVALESE TEAM FUTURA 10.26,1 2.04,8 14,374 113 48. BLEKEN Magnus 1987 NOR-FABERG NORVEGIA 10.31,8 2.10,5 14,245 89 49. KAARBY Petter 1985 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 10.32,9 2.11,6 14,220 77 50. FENSTAD Stale 1986 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 10.33,8 2.12,5 14,200 24 51. BRANDSDAL Helge 1971 NOR-SKEDSMOKORSET NORVEGIA 10.34,0 2.12,7 14,195 161 52. CONTI Tiziano 1991 ITA-TESERO U.S. CORNACCI 10.34,2 2.12,9 14,191 118 53. BERG Stian 1994 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 10.36,4 2.15,1 14,142 70 54. SEDLACEK Vaclav 1986 CZE-LIBEREC REPUBBLICA CECA 10.36,6 2.15,3 14,137 29 55. SYRSTAD Torleif 1994 NOR-XX NORVEGIA 10.40,6 2.19,3 14,049 14 56. WILHELMSSON Erik 1979 SWE-LONDKOPING SVEZIA 10.42,3 2.21,0 14,012 143 57. KOFFELD Ragnar 1986 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 10.42,6 2.21,3 14,005 378 58. HOEST Anders Moelmen 1991 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 10.49,4 2.28,1 13,858 15 59. HULBAK Sigurd Sollien 1995 NOR-HEMSEDAL NORVEGIA 10.51,0 2.29,7 13,824 50 60. NIELSEN Kristoffer 1988 NOR-SKIEN NORVEGIA 10.56,5 2.35,2 13,709 48 61. LAGERSKOG John 1974 SWE-STOCKHOLM SVEZIA 11.03,7 2.42,4 13,560 84 Cronometraggio ufficiale e classifiche DATASPORT, CH-Gerlafingen www.datasport.com per classifiche, iscrizioni online e informazioni data: 09.02.18 45° Marcialonga, I-Predazzo 2018 (classifica ufficiosa) orario: 10:37:55 pagina: 2 (91) MASCHILE 70KM (70 km Ufficiosa) (Lampogas Final Climb) posto cognome e nome anno nazione/località squadra tempo distacco km/h pett 62. NILSSON Isak 1985 SWE-GNOSJO SVEZIA 11.06,1 2.44,8 13,511 336 63. GIARDINA Jacopo 1996 ITA-PADOVA TEAM FUTURA 11.06,9 2.45,6 13,495 239 64. NESS Ole Jakob 1972 NOR-LARVIK NORVEGIA 11.08,0 2.46,7 13,473 131 64. SMENES Atle 1989 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 11.08,0 2.46,7 13,473 26 66. BACK Markus 1985 SWE-STOCKHOLM SVEZIA 11.12,0 2.50,7 13,392 355 67. SRAIL Jan 1990 CZE-XX REPUBBLICA CECA 11.13,4 2.52,1 13,365 21 68. ALM Henrik 1982 SWE-IDRE SVEZIA 11.13,6 2.52,3 13,361 65 69. ONDRASEK Pavel 1992 CZE-RYMAROV REPUBBLICA CECA 11.14,8 2.53,5 13,337 80 70. SOLBAKKEN Fred Anders 1965 NOR-HARSTAD NORVEGIA 11.15,2 2.53,9 13,329 122 71. STOLEN Erling Viljugrein 1990 NOR-GJOVIK NORVEGIA 11.18,3 2.57,0 13,268 643 72. GJESTRUMBAKKEN Thomas 1994 NOR-SPERREBOTN NORVEGIA 11.22,5 3.01,2 13,186 62 73. POLASEK Jan Ferdinand 1988 CZE-Prague REPUBBLICA CECA 11.25,5 3.04,2 13,129 622 74. BOHLMARK Anders 1973 SWE-STOCKHOLM SVEZIA 11.27,2 3.05,9 13,096 146 75. FUCCARO Francesco 1990 ITA-MOGGIO UDINESE SOTTOZERO NORDIC TEAM A.S.D. 11.28,0 3.06,7 13,081 120 76. ENGSETH Lars 1987 NOR-LILLEHAMMER NORVEGIA 11.28,4 3.07,1 13,073 171 77. GULLHAV Anders 1987 NOR-TRONDHEIM NORVEGIA 11.28,6 3.07,3 13,069 330 78. BORMOLINI Thomas 1993 ITA-LIVIGNO TEAM TRENTINO ROBINSON TRAINER 11.28,8 3.07,5 13,066 54 79. MAENPAA Hans 1979 FIN-JAKOBSTAD SANDSUND FINLANDIA 11.29,2 3.07,9 13,058 36 80. LOFFLER Jonas 1992 GER-FREIBURG GERMANIA 11.29,9 3.08,6 13,045 158 81. VARESCO Simone 1996 ITA-Tesero U.S. CORNACCI 11.30,7 3.09,4 13,030 436 82. MYRSTAD Marius 1978 NOR-BAERUMS VAERK NORVEGIA 11.31,9 3.10,6 13,007 317 83. SKOGSHOLM Vinjar 1994 NOR-RENA NORVEGIA 11.33,1 3.11,8 12,985 63 84. STOCEK Fabian 1994 CZE-JILEMNICE REPUBBLICA CECA 11.36,0 3.14,7 12,931 173 85. BACHL Philipp 1989 AUT-ZWETTL AN DER RODL AUSTRIA 11.36,2 3.14,9 12,927 46 86. DUTTO Lorenzo 1995 ITA-BOVES S.C. VALLE MAIRA 11.37,9 3.16,6 12,895 1079 87. WINKER Christian 1996 GER-BERLIN GERMANIA 11.38,9 3.17,6 12,877 67 88. VAKSDAL Fridtjof 1993 NOR-OSLO NORVEGIA 11.39,1 3.17,8 12,873 141 89. BORMOLINI Nicolas 1993 ITA-LIVIGNO TEAM TRENTINO ROBINSON TRAINER 11.39,2 3.17,9 12,871 55 90. SAMUELSSON Johan 1980 SWE-PITEA SVEZIA 11.39,4 3.18,1 12,868 309 91. BEITMYREN Jan Olav 1965 NOR-GJOVIK NORVEGIA 11.40,7 3.19,4 12,844 129 92.
Recommended publications
  • Naiset Ylivoiman Takana
    Naiset ylivoiman takana Edellisten vuosien tapaan norjalaiset ovat kuluneella kaudella onnistuneet esittämään hurjaa ylivoimaa maastohiihdon maailmancupissa. Miksi Norja on maastohiihdon ykkösmaa? Tähän koko hiihtoperhettä askarruttavaan kysymykseen etsivät vastausta niin valmentajat kuin penkkiurheilijat. TEKSTI ELINA HUHDANKOSI aksalainen hiihtolegenda Jochen huono talvi, niin silloinkin suksia myydään Behle kommentoi maastohiihdon 450 000 paria. Eli norjalaiset etsivät sen S nykytilaa: ”Ei tämä ole Norjan vika, lumen jostakin.” vaan muiden on tehtävä jotain. Lajille ei ole Suomessa vastaava määrä hyväksi, jos vain yksi maa hallitsee hiihtoa.” vaihtelee 150 000-250 000 suksiparin Norjan nais- ja mieshiihtäjät välillä. Ei siis ole mikään ihme, että Suomi ovat alkukauden aikana ehtineet tehdä voitti nuorten maailmanmestaruuden huikeita suorituksia maastohiihdon saralla. jääkiekossa eikä maastohiihdossa. Vuodenvaihteen jälkeen Norjan Norjan huippuhiihtäjät, jotka naishiihtäjät ottivat kolmoisvoiton ja pystyvät voittamaan yhä uudelleen ja mieshiihtäjät kaksoisvoiton Tour de Ski - uudelleen, nauttivat kotimaassaan erityistä kiertueella. Jopa norjalaiset pelkäävät suosiota. He ovat nuorten esikuvia, minkä ylivoimallaan pilaavan maastohiihdon seurauksena yhä useampi nuori haluaa tulla maineen. heidän kaltaisekseen. Norjassa hiihtäjien Hiihto on Norjan kansallinen taso on kiven kova, joten maajoukkueeseen urheilulaji. Suksimaahantuoja kommentoi pääsy edellyttää hiihtäjiltä todellista asiaa seuraavasti: ”Hyvänä talvena lahjakkuutta ja armotonta
    [Show full text]
  • Part Iii the Inquiries Conducted After The
    FINAL REPORT 47 PART III THE INQUIRIES CONDUCTED AFTER THE TRAGEDY 1. THE ADMINISTRATIVE INQUIRY BY THE ITALIAN AIR FORCE 1.1 Introduction The Committee of Italian Air Force officers convened by the Command of the 1st Air Region on 4 February 1998 (known as a technical inquiry) drew up its report in accordance with STANAG 3531 on investigations of accidents/incidents involving military aircraft from two or more NATO nations. This Committee worked in conjunction with its US counterpart, from which it obtained information as required. It did not, however, obtain copies of the documentation consigned to the official records, although it had free access for consultation purposes. The Committee’s investigations covered its fields of interest, where compatible with the procedures of the Italian judicial investigation, taking due account of the fact that many of the objects, materials, and documents had been seized. The investigation was affected by the fact that the crew members had opted to exercise their right to remain silent under questioning about the event. The Committee therefore recognized that it could not obtain certain fundamental information from the parties directly involved, such as data on the planning and execution of the mission, and that it could not ascertain the exact dynamic of events or the conduct of the crew members during the mission. 1.2 Summary of the Air Force investigation report The report contains the essential data on the most significant parts of the mission denominated « EASY 01 »: from pre-flight briefing to take-off from Aviano, the impact with the cableway and the emergency landing.
    [Show full text]
  • <Vorname> <Nachname>
    To the INTERNATIONAL SKI FEDERATION - Members of the FIS Council Blochstrasse 2 - National Ski Associations 3653 Oberhofen/Thunersee - Committee Chairwomen/Chairmen Switzerland Tel +41 33 244 61 61 Fax +41 33 244 61 71 Oberhofen, 4th June 2019 Summary of the FIS Council Meeting, 2nd June 2019, Cavtat-Dubrovnik (CRO) Dear Mr. President, Dear Ski Friends, In accordance with art. 32.2 of the FIS Statutes we have pleasure in sending you the Summary of the most important decisions from the FIS Council Meeting which took place on 2nd June 2019 in Cavtat-Dubrovnik (CRO). 1. Members present The following elected Council Members were present at the meeting in Cavtat- Dubrovnik (SUI) on Sunday, 2nd June 2019: President Gian Franco Kasper, Vice-Presidents Mats Arjes, Janez Kocijancic, Aki Murasato and Patrick Smith, Members: Andrey Bokarev, Steve Dong Yang, Dean Gosper, Alfons Hörmann, Hannah Kearney (Athletes’ Commission Representative), Roman Kumpost, Dexter Paine, Flavio Roda, Erik Roeste, Konstantin Schad (Athletes’ Commission Representative), Peter Schröcksnadel, Martti Uusitalo (by ‘phone), Eduardo Valenzuela and Michel Vion. Secretary General Sarah Lewis 2. Minutes from the Council Meeting in Oberhofen (SUI) November 2019 With the inclusion of a correction in the report on Tokyo 2020 (reference to currency Japanese yen instead of US dollars) requested by Vice-President Aki Murasato, the minutes from the Council Meeting in Oberhofen (SUI) from 16th November 2018 and the Gathering in Åre (SWE) from 13th February were approved. 3. The FIS World
    [Show full text]
  • Bua-065-2018-Web.Pdf
    KONZEPT TOUR DE SKI SAISONS 2019/2020 & 2020/2021 IN LIECHTENSTEIN 1. EINLEITUNG 2 2. LANGLAUF IN LIECHTENSTEIN 3 3. TOUR DE SKI 7 4. TOUR DE SKI IN LIECHTENSTEIN 8 5. ANHÄNGE 23 Kontaktadresse Kandidaturkomitee Verein zur Förderung des Nordischen Skisports c/o Liechtensteinischer Skiverband Landstrasse 81 FL-9494 Schaan Tel: +423 233 36 30 1 1. EINLEITUNG Die Begeisterung für den Skisport in Liechtenstein ist riesig. So ist beispielsweise in keinem anderen Land der Skiverband grösser als der Fussballverband. Regelmässig gelingt es, sowohl im Langlaufsport wie auch im alpinen Bereich Topathleten an die Weltspitze zu führen. Der Liechten- steinische Skiverband geniesst international eine ausgezeichnete Reputation. Diese positive Wahr- nehmung würde im Rahmen eines Weltcup-Anlasses auch auf das Land Liechtenstein übergreifen. Die Tour de Ski-Etappe wird in 25 bis 30 Ländern live übertragen. Ebenfalls ist eine Berichterstat- tung im Vorfeld des Events, wie auch über die Resultate im Rahmen von Sportprogrammen, zu erwarten. Allein bei SRF haben am 01.01.2016 über 600‘000 TV-Zuschauer den Langlaufsprint in Lenzerheide live mitverfolgt. Insgesamt bietet dieser Anlass Liechtenstein die Möglichkeit, sich von seiner besten Seite zu zeigen und positiv in den Medien wahrgenommen zu werden. Im Rahmen des FIS-Kongresses im Mai 2018 wurde der provisorische „Weltcup Kalender Lang- lauf“ für die Saison 2019/2020 besprochen. Im Vorfeld des zuständigen Komitee-Meetings wurde der Vertreter des liechtensteinischen Skiverbandes, Präsident Dr. Alexander Ospelt, von Swiss- Ski daraufhin hingewiesen, dass sich unter Umständen die Chance bieten würde, die Tour de Ski Etappe von Obersdorf (D) zu erhalten. Dies weil Obersdorf die WM 2020/2021 durchführt und die Organisation sich auf diesen Event hin fokussiert.
    [Show full text]
  • NEUCHÂTEL La Compagnie Linga Se Met À Table PAGE 11 SP-GERT WEIGELT JEUDI 7 JANVIER 2016 | | N0 4 | CHF 2.70 | J.A
    NUCLÉAIRE La Corée du Nord refait des siennes PAGE 15 NEUCHÂTEL La Compagnie Linga se met à table PAGE 11 SP-GERT WEIGELT JEUDI 7 JANVIER 2016 | www.arcinfo.ch | N0 4 | CHF 2.70 | J.A. - 2002 NEUCHÂTEL La police ferroviaire ferme son bureau neuchâtelois SÉCURITÉ Les CFF ont décidé de fermer l’uni- INQUIÉTUDES Le Syndicat du personnel des RENFORCEMENT De leur côté, les CFF assu- que bureau de police ferroviaire du canton transports s’inquiète de cette réorganisation rent que les agents continueront de couvrir de Neuchâtel fin février. Les agents opére- des ressources de la police ferroviaire. le territoire neuchâtelois. Les effectifs seront ront depuis Bienne, puis depuis Yverdon. Il craint que Neuchâtel soit délaissé. même renforcés en Suisse romande. PAGE 3 La ligne 120 rallongée peine à s’adapter au nouvel horaire DAVID MARCHON DAVID NEUCHÂTEL-OUEST La fusion est contestée mais la convention signée PAGE 7 LA CHAUX-DE-FONDS Après un 2015 «horribilis», chasse à la morosité ouverte PAGE 9 SECOND TUNNEL DU GOTHARD Un comité romand dénonce une «escroquerie» PAGE 16 LA MÉTÉO DU JOUR pied du Jura à 1000m 3° 7° 1° 5° DAVID MARCHON LITTORAL L’entrée en vigueur du nouvel horaire, le 13 décembre, a entraîné de nombreuses modifications SOMMAIRE sur les lignes de bus du Littoral. Plusieurs améliorations ont été apportées. Mais la ligne 120, qui a été Feuilleton PAGE 12 Télévision PAGE 25 rallongée et relie désormais la gare de Neuchâtel aux Grattes, souffre encore de nombreux retards. PAGE 5 Cinéma PAGE 13 Carnet P. 2 6 - 2 7 TERRORISME SKI ALPIN La France a-t-elle tiré Steve Locher revient sur son les leçons du 7 janvier 2015? éviction de l’équipe de Suisse Un an après l’attentat contre «Charlie Neuf mois après avoir été écarté de Hebdo», les mesures annoncées par Paris l’équipe de Suisse de slalom, Steve Locher pour lutter contre le terrorisme irritent évoque les causes de son départ, certains, qui critiquent l’inaction de l’Etat parle de son présent et aborde l’avenir.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats, 21-22 July 1995, Castelvecchio Pascoli, Tuscany, Italy
    Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats 21-22 July 1995 Castelvecchio Pascoli, Tuscany, Italy S. Padulosi, K. Hammer and J. Heller, editors ii HULLED WHEATS The International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) is an autonomous international scientific organization operating under the aegis of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). The international status of IPGRI is conferred under an Establishment Agreement which, by December 1995, had been signed by the Governments of Australia, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, China, Chile, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Greece, Guinea, Hungary, India, Iran, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, Mauritania, Morocco, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Senegal, Slovak Republic, Sudan, Switzerland, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine and Uganda. IPGRI's mandate is to advance the conservation and use of plant genetic resources for the benefit of present and future generations. IPGRI works in partnership with other organizations, undertaking research, training and the provision of scientific and technical advice and information, and has a particularly strong programme link with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Financial support for the agreed research agenda of IPGRI is provided by the Governments of Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA, and by the Asian Development Bank, IDRC, UNDP and the World Bank. The Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) is operated as an independent foundation under public law. The foundation statute assigns to IPK the task of conducting basic research in the area of plant genetics and research on cultivated plants.
    [Show full text]
  • FIS Cross-Country World Cup Media Guide 202/21
    FIS Cross-Country World Cup media guide 202/21 14th December 2020 INTERNATIONAL SKI FEDERATION FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DE SKI INTERNATIONALER SKI VERBAND Content overview Click on title for short link. General information FIS Cross-Country World Cup team Event specific information Dresden (GER) Tour de Ski - Val Müstair (SUI) Tour de Ski - Toblach (ITA) Tour de Ski - Val di Fiemme (ITA) Ulricehamn (SWE) Lahti (FIN) Falun (SWE) Ulricehamn (SWE) Nove Mesto (CZE) Oslo (NOR) Bejing (CHN) General information All documents mentioned below can be found on the FIS Covid-19 Hub on the FIS website (https://www.fis-ski.com/inside-fis/covid-19-hub): • Every stakeholder involved in a FIS World Cup must follow the FIS Testing Protocol. • The general FIS media guidelines give all involved stakeholders direction on how to approach work along the World Cup events. Please note: • Each organizer has set up specific measurements that are specified to their national health regulations. Those measurements will always take precedent and all individuals working in media operations should respect all regulations in place at every venue • Media representatives will not be allowed to attend the TCM. The TCM will be streamed online if approved by all stakeholders. The link to the stream will be published on the FIS Cross-Country media website and communicated via the media mailing system. • No physical press conferences will be held post-race. Virtual press conferences will be held if requested and streamed via the same stream as the TCM. • Statements of the top-3 athletes per race will be published on the FIS Cross-Country soundcloud account (https://soundcloud.com/fiscross-country).
    [Show full text]
  • Val Di Fiemme Is a Truly Inspiring Place to Ski and Combined with the Warm Welcome from the Locals You Will Be Hard Pressed to Find Anything Better in Europe
    e m m e fi val di NEXT MAKE AN ENQUIRY 1 11 “an experience quaranteed to have everyone yearning to return.” North East Trentino hides one of the best ski Our hotels are situated along the valley with easy resorts in the Italian Dolomites – the Val di access to the ski areas. All are family owned & Fiemme. Encircled by the picturesque Lagorai, run and offer space for only one or two groups, Pale of San Martino and Latemar Dolomites the accommodating the students in spacious rooms valley boasts one of the most snow sure ski areas in all with private facilities. The food and standard of Europe. One ski pass covering a variety of ski areas service is first class and guests are always made to offering over 160km of some of the best skiing in feel at home and part of the family. the Italian Dolomites. Each of the ski areas offers a very different skiing experience, but they all The traditional valley towns of Cavalese and share the same high quality lift system (consisting Predazzo have a relaxing alpine atmosphere and mainly of chairlifts and gondolas) and pride in offer excellent facilities including swimming pools, piste preparation that is often quoted as being the ice rinks, discotheques and a variety of shops; and best in Europe. The majority of the slopes are over of course no visit would be complete without a visit 1700m and this, combined with excellent snow to a Pizzeria and Ice Cream Café! making facilities, ensures great skiing throughout the season from December to mid-April.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project ERIC TERZUOLO Interviewed By: Mark Taub
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project ERIC TERZUOLO Interviewed by: Mark Tauber Initial interview date: December 14, 2017 Copyright 2019 ADST INTERVIEW Q: Today is December 14, 2017. Eric, where and when were you born? TERZUOLO: I was born in Los Angeles, California, 60-some years ago, and resided primarily in Los Angeles until I was about three years old, when my parents and I moved to Minneapolis, Minnesota. Q: What brought them to Minneapolis? TERZUOLO: I should note I am the child of immigrants to the United States. I actually remember vaguely when my parents were naturalized. My father was part of the continuing Italian brain drain. My parents emigrated as adults. They were accomplished, educated people. Let’s say I was part of a very privileged immigration, but nonetheless experienced a lot of the same sorts of issues that less fortunate immigrant children do in terms of acculturation and so forth. Q: Well then, before we go further, from where did your parents emigrate? TERZUOLO: From Italy. Q: Do you know anything about the home area they came from? TERZUOLO: Oh, yes. Actually, I know it well, because my parents were the only people from their respective families who left and came to the United States and, unlike a lot of immigrants, retained strong ties to home. I think that, for the first few years, they didn’t get back to Italy at all, but otherwise we would tend to go pretty much every year. I knew the rest of the rather small family on both sides.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairo, Egypt, 15 - 18 May 2017)
    AIM SG/3-IP/3 07/05/2017 International Civil Aviation Organization MIDANPIRG AIM Sub-Group Third Meeting (AIM SG/3) (Cairo, Egypt, 15 - 18 May 2017) Agenda Item 4: AIM Planning and Implementation in the MID Region AIM-RELATED ACCIDENTS AND INCIDENTS (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY This information paper presents AIM-related contributory factors and recommendations related to some of accidents and incidents. Action by the meeting is at paragraph 3. REFERENCES - EUROCONTROL 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 For the sake of safety promotion and continuing on the experience, this thread is created by the EUROCONTROL to share the incident/accident reports where the aeronautical data and/or aeronautical information products (e.g. AIP, charts, NOTAM, etc.) were considered among the findings, contributory factors and/or safety recommendations. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Some of AIM-related contributing factors and recommendations of accidents/incidents are as follows: A333, Kathmandu Nepal, 2015 Use of resolution and rounding in publication and calculation of runway threshold coordinates Use of AIRAC for publication/cancellation of AIP SUP Coordination between aeronautical information services and aerodrome authorities Provision of raw aeronautical information/data by the aerodrome authorities in accordance with the accuracy and integrity requirements SW4, Sanikiluaq Nunavut Canada, 2012 The lack of required flight documents, such as instrument approach charts, compromised thoroughness and placed pressure on the Captain to find a work- around solution during flight planning. It also negatively affected the crew’s situational awareness during the approaches at Sanikiluaq. AIM SG/3-IP/3 - 2 - CL60, Lexington KY USA, 2006 Because of an ongoing construction project, the taxiway identifiers represented in the airport chart available to the flight crew were inaccurate, and the information contained in a local NOTAM about the closure of taxiway was not made available to the crew via ATIS broadcast or the flight release paperwork.
    [Show full text]
  • FIS Council Decisions Dubrovnik 2019
    INTERNATIONAL SKI FEDERATION Blochstrasse 2 3653 Oberhofen/Thunersee Switzerland Tel +41 33 244 61 61 Fax +41 33 244 61 71 Dubrovnik, Croatia 2nd June 2019 FOR MORE INFORMATION Jenny Wiedeke FIS Communications Manager Mobile: + 41 79 449 53 99 E-Mail: [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FIS MEDIA INFO Decisions of the FIS Council at the Spring Meeting 2019 in Catvat-Dubrovnik (CRO) The FIS Council held its Spring Meeting in Catvat-Dubrovnik (CRO) on Sunday 2nd June and dealt with a full agenda, including items such as reports from Organising Committees of the FIS World Championships and Olympic Winter Games, the appointment of technical officials, proposals from the FIS Technical Committees, FIS World Cup calendars and rules updates. The main decisions of the Council in Dubrovnik are as follows: FIS World Cup calendars 2019/2020 The FIS World Cup Calendars for the upcoming 2019/2020 season were approved with generally minor modifications proposed by the Technical Committees. In the case of Alpine Skiing the changes were more significant following the decision of the FIS Council in February 2019 to promote the alpine combined and maintain it on the programme of the FIS Alpine World Ski Championships Cortina 2021, along with the introduction of the individual parallel event. The ladies’ calendar sees the inclusion of four alpine combined competitions with three for the men. The calendars for 2019/2020 will be on the FIS website from Monday 3rd June, as well as future calendar drafts for Cross-Country and Alpine Skiing until 2021/22. Of note in the Audi FIS Alpine Ski World Cup calendar for the upcoming season is a trip to the Far East for the men’s tour where they will compete in the first ever competitions in China, which are also the first official Beijing 2022 Olympic Winter Games Test Event in any sport.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae of Jan Bena
    Jan Bena Curriculum Vitae September 2021 Contact University of British Columbia – Sauder School of Business 2053 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.janbena.com UBC Sauder faculty profile: https://www.sauder.ubc.ca/people/jan-bena ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7235-8242 SSRN: https://ssrn.com/author=576102 Academic positions University of British Columbia (UBC) – Sauder School of Business, Vancouver • Finance Division Chair 2020/07–Present. • Bank of Montreal Chair in International Finance 2019–Present. • Ph.D. Advisor for Finance 2017/07–2020/06. • Associate Professor with Tenure 2017–Present. • Assistant Professor 2009–2017. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London • Tutorial Fellow 2005–2009. Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague • Junior Researcher 2004–2009. Education • London School of Economics and Political Science, London, Ph.D. in Finance, 2006–2009. • The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education – Economics Institute (CERGE-EI) – Charles University, Prague, Ph.D. in Economics, 2002–2006. Research interests • Innovation: Corporate innovation. Asset pricing of technological progress. • Private equity: Corporate ownership structure. Frictions in raising external finance. • Entrepreneurship: Ownership of startup companies. • Finance and industrial organization: Product market interactions. Publications • “Shielding Firm Value: Employment Protection and Process Innovation,” with Hernán Ortiz-Molina and Elena Simintzi, September 2021, Journal of Financial Economics, accepted. • “The International Propagation of Economic Downturns Through Multinational Companies: The Real Economy Channel,” with Serdar Dinc and Isil Erel, August 2021, Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming. Covered by NBER Digest. • “Corporate Innovation and Returns,” with Lorenzo Garlappi, August 2020, Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Volume 9, Issue 2, p.
    [Show full text]