DOCSLIB.ORG

Delineation of Linguopersonology and Linguoaxiology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DELINEATION OF LINGUOPERSONOLOGY AND LINGUOAXIOLOGY ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY IN POZNAN Tetyana Kosmeda, Anatolij Zahnitko, Zhanna Krasnobaieva-Chorna DELINEATION OF LINGUOPERSONOLOGY AND LINGUOAXIOLOGY POZNAN 2019 3 Reviewers Professor, Doctor of Philology Pshemislav Yuzvikevich – Wroclaw University (Poland) / dr hab. prof. UWr Przemysław Jóźwikiewicz – Uniwersytet Wrocławski (Polska) This publication was financed by the Institute of Russian and Ukrainian Studies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan © Tetyana Kosmeda, Anatolij Zahnitko, Zhanna Krasnobaieva-Chorna This edition © Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu 2019, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2019 Published on the basis of an authorised copy Graphic design of the cover: Ewa Wąsowska Technical editor: Dorota Borowiak Formatting text: Eugeniusz Strykowski ISВN 978-83-232-3536-1 WYDAWNICTWO NAUKOWE UNIWERSYTETU IM. ADAMA MICKIEWICZA W POZNANIU 61-701 POZNAŃ, UL. FREDRY 10 Sekretariat: tel. 61 829 46 46, faks 61 829 46 47, e-mail: [email protected] Dział Promocji i Sprzedaży: tel. 61 829 46 40, e-mail: [email protected] Ark. wyd. 16,25. Ark. druk. 15,875 DRUK I OPRAWA: VOLUMINA.PL DANIEL KRZANOWSKI, SZCZECIN, UL. KS. WITOLDA 7–9 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1 CATEGORIES, LEVELS AND UNITS OF LINGUOPERSONOLOGY (A. Zahnitko) ............................................................................ 15 1.1. Categorical and paradigm scope of modern linguopersonology ..... 15 1.2. The theory of modern linguopersonology levels and categories ..... 25 CHAPTER 2 THE THEORY OF LINGUOPERSONEME: THE TYPOLOGY OF LINGUO- INDIVIDUATIONS AND LINGUOINDIVIDUALIZATIONS (A. Zahnitko) .... 38 2.1. Language personality in epistolary discourse: the typology of linguoindividuations and linguoindividualizations ................... 38 2.2. Communicative and discourse scope of the language personality of Ivan Franko ................................................................... 45 2.3. Grammatical conception of Yurii Shevelov: evolution of views (1940‒1950) .................................................................... 58 2.4. Language existentiality of Vasyl Stus: artistic-speech scope .......... 66 2.5. Psycholinguistic model of linguopersonality: categorical and level scope ........................................................................... 93 CHAPTER 3 EGO-TEXT LINGUISTICS: THEORETICAL OUTLINE ASPECTUAL APPRO- ACHES TO THE PRIVATE LETTER ANALYSIS (T. Kosmeda) ............... 97 3.1. Ego-text and its main genres (diary, memoirs, autobiography, letter). General characteristics .............................................. 98 3.1.1. Formation of the concept of ego-text in modern linguistics. Its dependance on the psychological cathegories of Ego and Alter Ego ............................................................... 100 3.1.2. Main genres of ego-text or types of personal texts. .............. 114 3.2. The genre of the letter. The discursive (stylistic) potential of the epistolary. The state of study of the problem ............................ 120 5 3.3. Lesya Ukrainka’s elite linguopersonality in the mirror of her private letters (case study of the poet’s epistolary and her reflections on letters in literary texts) ...................................................... 127 3.3.1. Lesya Ukrainka’s attitude to the phenomenon of correspon- dence (some comments on letters and the process of their writing in the poet’s artistic texts). ................................. 127 3.3.2. Lesya Ukrainka’s private letters as “a reflection” of her speech and the most intimate movements of her soul. ......... 129 CHAPTER 4 QUALIFYING BASES OF AXIOPHRASEME PRAGMATICS (Zh. Krasno- baieva-Chorna) ......................................................................... 147 4.1. Axiophraseme pragmatics as a section of linguistics ................... 147 4.2. The specifics of the phrasemic evaluation: theoretical and applied foundations ................................................................... 148 4.2.1. To the question of the evaluative component of the phrasemic meaning ................................................................ 148 4.2.2. Typology of phrasemes according to their evaluation load .... 150 4.2.2.1. Positively evaluative phrasemes .......................... 150 4.2.2.2. Negatively evaluative phrasemes ............................... 157 4.2.2.3. Neutrally evaluative phraseme ........................... 164 4.2.2.4. Phrasemes with diffuse evaluation ....................... 165 4.3. The algorithm of reconstruction of the axiological world’s image in phrasemics .................................................................... 168 4.3.1. Stage 1. The research illustrative corpus .......................... 169 4.3.2. Stage 2. A nomenclature of universal values ..................... 169 4.3.3. Stage 3. The level model of the axiological world’s image ..... 170 4.3.4. Stage 4. Phrasemic axiological oppositions of values ........... 170 4.3.5. Stage 5. The ideographic parametrization of values ............. 172 4.3.6. Stage 6. The level organization of values .......................... 180 4.3.7. Stage 7. Cultural coding of values .................................. 185 4.3.8. Stage 8. Cultural coding of axiological world’s image .......... 192 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................ 200 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................... 205 List of sources ..................................................................... 224 Bibliography [References] ....................................................... 225 List of sources [References] ...................................................... 249 ESSAYS ON LINGUOPERSONOLOGY AND LINGUOAXIOLOGY (Summary) ............................................................................ 251 6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Axiological World’s Image – AWI Conversational – conver. Derogatory – derog. Disapprovingly – disappr. Ethnographic – ethnogr. Familiar – fam. German – Germ. Invective – invect. Ironical – ironic. Literary – liter. Obsolete form – obsol. Playful – playf. Phrasemic Axiological Oppositions – PhAO Phraseme-Semantical Groups – PhSG Phraseme-Semantical Subgroups – PhSSG Russian – Russ. Solemn style – solemn Ukrainian – Ukr. Vernacular – vernac. Vulgar – vulg. 7 8 INTRODUCTION Linguopersonology is a part of linguistic science which concentra- tes attention on studying of language personality in its integrity. Lan- guage personality is a totality of all language abilities and realizations of the personality where language personality has two main concep- tual dimensions – monopersonologic and polypersonologic. The first represents a separate language individuality in the whole scope of their expressions – temporal, spatial, evolutional, cultural and aesthe- tic, social, linguocultural and others. Language personality in their formation goes through two main periods of linguoindividuational expressions: 1) externally personologic when the potential of langua- ge abilities is formed spontaneously as a self-formation of individuali- ty through the strengthening of “I”, the determination of one’s own main function and dominant directive, the development of a peculiar “mask” through which the individual activates, accommodates to the reQuirement of the society; 2) internally personologic in which “the initiation into internal reality” becomes the most active, profound self-cognition as well as cognition of the human nature is functionally loaded. Within this period, everything that was earlier cognized and accumulated is internally analyzed, with the formation of the integral picture of self-awareness, internal and external connection with the Universe, fixed world arrangement. Within the first period of linguo- individuation, the personality acQuires sufficient resources for realiza- tion, self-acknowledgement and gaining the corresponding level of recognizability. The principle of system and the principle of contrastiveness are functionally topical in linguopersonology. The integrity of the de- scription of linguoperson is based on the first principle, demanding the processing of the description model with consecutive analysis of the collection of factors and parameters, motivators and indicators of 9 language realization of the personality. The differentiation of the ver- bal and non-verbal values of language personality is also rather im- portant. The second principle provides an adeQuate analysis of lingu- operson on the basis of comparison providing corresponding commenting of certain peculiarities of language behaviour of the per- sonality, their expression in different life periods and in correspon- ding social surroundings, the realization of mono-, bi- or polylingual intentions by the communicant. The main categories of linguopersonology include the categories of person, linguoperson, personalism. The category of person and/or linguoperson comprises the investigation of their needs comprising five binary foundations (by H. Murray): 1) primary (the needs of the body) – secondary (psychogenic) need; 2) open (assumptive in consciousness) – latent (excluded from consciousness) need; 3) focal (connected with certain object) – diffuse (do not depend on certain objects) need; 4) proactive (the reaction on internal factors) – reactive (the reaction on the factors
Recommended publications
  • Dialect Contact and Convergence in Contemporary Hutsulshchyna By

    Dialect Contact and Convergence in Contemporary Hutsulshchyna By

    Coming Down From the Mountain: Dialect Contact and Convergence in Contemporary Hutsulshchyna By Erin Victoria Coyne A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Johanna Nichols, Chair Professor Alan Timberlake Professor Lev Michael Spring 2014 Abstract Coming Down From the Mountain: Dialect Contact and Convergence in Contemporary Hutsulshchyna by Erin Victoria Coyne Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Johanna Nichols, Chair Despite the recent increased interest in Hutsul life and culture, little attention has been paid to the role of dialect in Hutsul identity and cultural revival. The primary focus of the present dissertation is the current state of the Hutsul dialect, both in terms of social perception and the structural changes resulting from the dominance of the standard language in media and education. Currently very little is known about the contemporary grammatical structure of Hutsul. The present dissertation is the first long-term research project designed to define both key elements of synchronic Hutsul grammar, as well as diachronic change, with focus on variation and convergence in an environment of increasing close sustained contact with standard Ukrainian resulting from both a historically-based sense of ethnic identification, as well as modern economic realities facing the once isolated and self-sufficient Hutsuls. In addition, I will examine the sociolinguistic network lines which allow and impede linguistic assimilation, specifically in the situation of a minority population of high cultural valuation facing external linguistic assimilation pressures stemming from socio-political expediency.
  • (Ruthenian Or Rusyn) Language in Poland Lemkos

    (Ruthenian Or Rusyn) Language in Poland Lemkos

    The 17th Meeting of the Baltic Division of the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names Warszawa, 29 June – 01 July 2015 Maciej Zych Commission on Standardization of Geographical Names Outside the Republic of Poland Romanization rules for the Lemko (Ruthenian or Rusyn) language in Poland Lemkos (Ruthenians or Rusyns) is an ethnic minority which has been recognized in Poland on the basis of the Act of 6th January 2005 on national and ethnic minorities and on the regional languages. The act mentions, in addition to the Lemkos, 9 national minorities: Belorussian, Czech, Lithuanian, German, Armenian, Russian, Slovak, Ukrainian, and Jewish; 3 ethnic minorities – Karait, Roma, and Tartar; as well as one regional language – the Kashubian language. The Act lays down, among others, that traditional names in a minority language for localities, physiographic objects and streets may be used as “additional names” alongside geographic names established in the Polish language. To date (as of 1st June 2015), additional names have been introduced in 1204 localities and parts of them located in 57 communes. There were introduced: 27 Belarusian names, 359 German names, 779 Kashubian names, 9 Lemko names, and 30 Lithuanian names. Additional names in minority languages appear on road signs, they are also used on some maps. Pursuant to the Regulation of the Minister of Administration and Digitization of 14th February 2012 on the national register of geographical names, the Surveyor General of Poland shall maintain the database of the National Register of Geographical Names. In the Register, among others, officially adopted names in minority languages shall be listed.
  • Contours and Consequences of the Lexical Divide in Ukrainian

    Contours and Consequences of the Lexical Divide in Ukrainian

    Geoffrey Hull and Halyna Koscharsky1 Contours and Consequences of the Lexical Divide in Ukrainian When compared with its two large neighbours, Russian and Polish, the Ukrainian language presents a picture of striking internal variation. Not only are Ukrainian dialects more mutually divergent than those of Polish or of territorially more widespread Russian,2 but on the literary level the language has long been characterized by the existence of two variants of the standard which have never been perfectly harmonized, in spite of the efforts of nationalist writers for a century and a half. While Ukraine’s modern standard language is based on the eastern dialect of the Kyiv-Poltava-Kharkiv triangle, the literary Ukrainian cultivated by most of the diaspora communities continues to follow to a greater or lesser degree the norms of the Lviv koiné in 1 The authors would like to thank Dr Lance Eccles of Macquarie University for technical assistance in producing this paper. 2 De Bray (1969: 30-35) identifies three main groups of Russian dialects, but the differences are the result of internal evolutionary divergence rather than of external influences. The popular perception is that Russian has minimal dialectal variation compared with other major European languages. Maximilian Fourman (1943: viii), for instance, told students of Russian that the language ‘is amazingly uniform; the same language is spoken over the vast extent of the globe where the flag of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics flies; and you will be understood whether you are speaking to a peasant or a university professor. There are no dialects to bother you, although, of course, there are parts of the Soviet Union where Russian may be spoken rather differently, as, for instance, English is spoken differently by a Londoner, a Scot, a Welshman, an Irishman, or natives of Yorkshire or Cornwall.
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2010, No.21

    The Ukrainian Weekly 2010, No.21

    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: • Chicago-area Ukrainians protest Yanukovych policies – page 4. • UCC concerned about developments in Ukraine – page 9. • Nina Matvienko: the singing conscience of Ukraine – page 13. THEPublished U by theKRA Ukrainian NationalIN AssociationIAN Inc., a fraternal Wnon-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXVIII No. 21 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MAY 23, 2010 $1/$2 in Ukraine Ukraine in danger: Administration Medvedev praises Yanukovych policies curtails freedom of assembly during state visit to Kyiv by Zenon Zawada erns Ukraine’s national police force, by Zenon Zawada It was Mr. Medvedev’s first visit in six Kyiv Press Bureau began demanding lists of participants Kyiv Press Bureau years to Kyiv after boycotting Ukraine dur- from the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc, the ing the presidency of Viktor Yushchenko, Ukraine in Danger: Ukraine’s civil opposition’s biggest force. KYIV – Russian Federation President whose cultural and foreign policies infuriat- society has begun to report on authoritar- “The new government considers a pro- Dmitry Medvedev visited the Ukrainian ed the Kremlin. The Russian president ian policies and rights abuses by the test meeting of democratic forces a crime, capital on May 17 and 18 to pursue his praised the policies of President Viktor administration of Viktor Yanukovych and based on which a criminal investigation nation’s fast-track policy of deepening the government led by Prime Minister has begun,” said Anatolii Semynoha, a cooperation and integration with Ukraine. (Continued on page 8) Mykola Azarov, which was formed on national deputy of the Tymoshenko Bloc. March 11 with the appointment of the In the few months since the Cabinet of Ministers.
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2004, No.16

    The Ukrainian Weekly 2004, No.16

    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE:• Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church begins move to Kyiv — page 3. • Ukrainian DP folklore: researchers needed — page 12. • Canadian educators change teaching of history in Ukraine — page 13. Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXII HE KRAINIANNo. 16 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, APRIL 18, 2004 EEKLY$1/$2 in Ukraine TUNA announces U W Majorityby Roman coalition Woronowycz tapsgiven Yanukovych up on political reform as through presidentialUkraine that the executive candidate branch had new member benefit Kyiv Press Bureau constitutional change even after the fail- pushed for several years. ure of the political reform bill on April While some members of the parlia- PARSIPPANY, N.J. – A new UNA KYIV – Leaders of the majority 8. mentary majority have stated they member benefit was launched on coalition of the Ukrainian Parliament The leader of the parliamentary would try to move a version of the Monday, April 12, as announced by and its member political parties voted majority, National Deputy Stepan failed bill onto the fall parliamentary UNA National Secretary Christine E. unanimously on April 14 to support Havrysh, said the matter of Mr. session, just prior to the presidential Kozak. “This is an extremely exciting Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych as Yanukovych’s candidacy did not entail elections, Verkhovna Rada Chairman time for the UNA. In honor of the their candidate for president. The agree- extensive debate. He underscored, how- Volodymyr Lytvyn said the issue is dead UNA’s 110th anniversary, and as always, ment was announced after a closed-door ever, that the majority coalition expect- for all practical purposes until at least keeping the UNA’s membership in mind, session attended by President Leonid ed Mr.
  • Conference Proceedings

    Conference Proceedings

    International Research Universities Network and Catholic Universities Partnership Graduate Students’ Conference CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS Edited by Kinga FÖLDVÁRY Pázmány Péter Catholic University Piliscsaba 2013 Reviewers: András CSER Kinga FÖLDVÁRY Éva FÜLÖP Gabriella LÁSZLÓ Balázs MATUSZKA This publication was supported by the project of Pázmány Péter Catholic University TÁMOP -4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0014. © Authors, 2013 © Pázmány Péter Catholic University, 2013 ISBN 978-963-308-134-1 CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................................. 3 Kinga Földváry Literary Studies The Role and Work of the Polygraph Ludovico Domenichi in the Printing Houses of Venice and Florence during the Sixteenth Century ......................................................... 7 Alessandro Tedesco The Library of the Jesuit College of Perugia. New Research Tools.............................. 11 Natale Vacalebre A Picture of the Historic Slovak Press during the Second Half of the 19th Century ..... 16 Michal Čakloš Animal Imagery in Virginia Woolf’s Works ................................................................. 21 Gabriella László A Comparative Study of Polish and Hungarian 20th Century Avant-Garde –Literature and Art – Selected Issues ............................................................................................... 26 Dorota Niedziałkowska The Road to Self-Discovery is Paved with Mary Sues.................................................. 35 Lucija Kelbl
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/23/2021 06:58:46PM Via Free Access

    Downloaded from Brill.Com09/23/2021 06:58:46PM Via Free Access

    Journal of Language Contact 6 (2013) 134–159 brill.com/jlc Ukrainian in the Language Map of Central Europe: Questions of Areal-Typological Profiling Andrii Danylenko Department of Modern Languages and Cultures Pace University, New York [email protected] Abstract The paper deals with the areal-typological profiling of Ukrainian among languages of Europe, constituting Standard Average European (SAE) and especially Central European (CE). Placed recently in the context of the ‘areal typology’ and the ‘dynamic taxonomy’, Ukrainian together with Russian and Belarusian appear to be mere replica languages. Such languages are capable of only borrowing surface structures migrating all over the Europe unie or imitating deep structures on the model of SAE or CE. In order to elaborate on an alternative profiling of Ukrainian among languages of (Central) Europe, the author concentrates on both phonological and morphosyntactic features treated commonly as CE Sprachbund-forming (the spirantization of *g, the dispalatalization of the pala- talized consonants, the existence of medial l, the umlauting, the three-tense system, including a simple preterit from the perfect, and the periphrastic ‘ingressive’ future). As a result, the author advances another vector of areal classification, thus positioning Russian in the core of ‘Standard Average Indo-European’ and (Southwest) Ukrainian as an intermediate language between Russian and the rest of (Central) European languages. Keywords Ukrainian; North Slavic; Central European Sprachbund; ‘Standard Average Indo-European’; areal-typological profiling 1. Introduction In comparative and typological studies, Ukrainian has been routinely treated as a transitional language from East Slavic (cf. Jakobson, 1929; Stadnik, 2001:94) to North Slavic (Mrázek, 1990:28-30; Besters-Dilger, 2000), West Slavic (Lehfeldt, 1972:333-336) or even South Slavic (Smal-Stockyj and Gartner, 1913).
  • Pdf [In Ukrainian] Pratsi

    Pdf [In Ukrainian] Pratsi

    МІНІСТЕРСТВО ОСВІТИ І НАУКИ УКРАЇНИ ДРОГОБИЦЬКИЙ ДЕРЖАВНИЙ ПЕДАГОГІЧНИЙ УНІВЕРСИТЕТ ІМЕНІ ІВАНА ФРАНКА MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF UKRAINE DROHOBYCH IVAN FRANKO STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY ISSN 2519-058X (Print) ISSN 2664-2735 (Online) СХІДНОЄВРОПЕЙСЬКИЙ ІСТОРИЧНИЙ ВІСНИК EAST EUROPEAN HISTORICAL BULLETIN ВИПУСК 17 ISSUE 17 Дрогобич, 2020 Drohobych, 2020 Рекомендовано до друку Вченою радою Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету імені Івана Франка (протокол від 30 листопада 2020 року № 17) Наказом Міністерства освіти і науки України збірник включено до КАТЕГОРІЇ «А» Переліку наукових фахових видань України, в яких можуть публікуватися результати дисертаційних робіт на здобуття наукових ступенів доктора і кандидата наук у галузі «ІСТОРИЧНІ НАУКИ» (Наказ МОН України № 358 від 15.03.2019 р., додаток 9). Східноєвропейський історичний вісник / [головний редактор В. Ільницький]. – Дрогобич: Видавничий дім «Гельветика», 2020. – Випуск 17. – 286 с. Збірник розрахований на науковців, викладачів історії, аспірантів, докторантів, студентів й усіх, хто цікавиться історичним минулим. Редакційна колегія не обов’язково поділяє позицію, висловлену авторами у статтях, та не несе відповідальності за достовірність наведених даних і посилань. Головний редактор: Ільницький В. І. – д.іст.н., проф. Відповідальний редактор: Галів М. Д. – д.пед.н., доц. Редакційна колегія: Манвідас Віткунас – д.і.н., доц. (Литва); Вацлав Вєжбєнєц – д.габ. з іс- торії, проф. (Польща); Дочка Владімірова-Аладжова – д.філос. з історії (Болгарія); Дюра Гарді – д.філос. з історії, професор (Сербія); Дарко Даровец – д. філос. з історії, проф. (Італія); Дегтярьов С. І. – д.і.н., проф. (Україна); Пол Джозефсон – д. філос. з історії, проф. (США); Сергій Єкельчик – д. філос. з історії, доц. (Канада); Сергій Жук – д.і.н., проф. (США); Саня Златановіч – д.філос.
  • The Cossack Myth: History and Nationhood in the Age of Empires

    The Cossack Myth: History and Nationhood in the Age of Empires

    THE COSSACK MYTH In the years following the Napoleonic Wars, a mysterious manuscript began to circulate among the dissatisfied noble elite of the Russian Empire. Entitled The History of the Rus′, it became one of the most influential historical texts of the modern era. Attributed to an eighteenth-century Orthodox archbishop, it described the heroic struggles of the Ukrainian Cossacks. Alexander Pushkin read the book as a manifestation of Russian national spirit, but Taras Shevchenko interpreted it as a quest for Ukrainian national liberation, and it would inspire thousands of Ukrainians to fight for the freedom of their homeland. Serhii Plokhy tells the fascinating story of the text’s discovery and dissemination, unravelling the mystery of its authorship and tracing its subsequent impact on Russian and Ukrainian historical and literary imagination. In so doing, he brilliantly illuminates the relationship between history, myth, empire, and nationhood, from Napoleonic times to the fall of the Soviet Union. serhii plokhy is the Mykhailo Hrushevsky Professor of Ukrainian History at Harvard University. His previous publications include Ukraine and Russia: Representations of the Past (2008)andThe Origins of the Slavic Nations: Premodern Identities in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus (2006). Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 210.212.129.125 on Sun Dec 23 05:35:34 WET 2012. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9781139135399 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012 new studies in european history Edited by PETER
  • Religious Freedom and Interfaith Dialogue

    Religious Freedom and Interfaith Dialogue

    First Day of Work Invited to participate in the conference: T. Antoshevsky (Lviv, 20 May, Friday Ukraine), D. Bazyka (Kyiv, Ukraine), V. Vitka (Moscow, Russia), A. Vlasenko (Kyiv, Ukraine), M. Havlinskyy (Kyiv, Ukraine), N. 10:30-11:45am Opening of the Conference. Director of the Institute of Gavrilov (Kyiv , Ukraine), O. Dobrodum (Odessa, Ukraine), S. Philosophy in the name of G.S. Skovoroda NAS Ukraine, academic Miroslav Kachurova (Kharkiv, Ukraine), I. Keller (Chernivtsi, Ukraine), O. Popovych WELCOMING-ADDRESSES Klymyshyn (Zaporozhye, Ukraine), Yuri Korolev (Kyiv, Ukraine), P. Adviser to the President - Head of the Department of Humanitarian and Kostylev (Moscow, Russia), O. Kotlyarov (Sevastopol, Ukraine), O. socio-political issues of the Administration of President of Ukraine Hanna Kryvosheyenko (Kyiv, Ukraine), O. Manzhos (Moscow, Russia), P. HERMAN Martyanov (Odessa, Ukraine), S. Morozyuk (sharp, Ukraine), V. Chairman of the the parliamentary committee of Ukraine on Culture and Saveliev (Odessa, Ukraine), E. Savisko (Chernigov, Ukraine), I. Spirituality, MP Volodymyr YAVORIVSKY Saletskyy (Kiev, Ukraine), V. Soshyn (Poltava, Ukraine), A. First Deputy Minister of Culture of Ukraine Yuriy BOGUTSKY Filimonov (Moscow, Russia), U. Havarivsky (Lviv, Ukraine), O. Director of the International Center for Law and Religion Studies Professor Chernyavskaya (Kharkiv, Ukraine), I. Shaban (Kyiv, Ukraine) and Cole DURHAM others. Secretary General of the International Association of Religious Freedom John GRATS Presentation of the new religious publications 11:45-12:00pm Break Browse the commemorative display 12:00-2:30pm ROUND TABLE “Twenty years of the law of ukraine on freedom of conscience and religious organizations” Moderators: Viktor Yelenskiy and Mikola Novichenko Invited to discuss: the deputies of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, leaders of religious communities.
  • UKRANES Dlfficult ROAD to INDEPENDENCE

    UKRANES Dlfficult ROAD to INDEPENDENCE

    835 . .. .. .. .. ~ ... June 14,1991 UKRANES DlFFIcuLT ROAD TO INDEPENDENCE INTRODUCTION Continued existence of a Soviet Union is increasingly doubtful because of the pro-independence movements and governments in all of its 15 republics. Yet just two of these republics hold the key to the Soviet Union's future.The first, of come, is Russia -the huge, resource-rich land that by itself would be by far Europe's most populous, biggest, and potentially richest nation. The second is Uk- raine, of which Vladimir hnin said shortly after the 1917 Bolshevik revolution: "If we lose [it], we will lose our heads."' Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev echoed Lenin in February 1989: "if there we3disorder in Ukraine...the whole fabric of the Soviet Union would disintegrate. To be sure, Ukraine is no Russia Still, with its 52 million people, its important location bordering on Byelorussia, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Russia, and its own venerable history and traditions, Ukraine would rank among Europe's top nations. And although it occupies less than three percent of the Soviet territory, Ukraine accounts for nearly one-fifth of Soviet industrial out- put and almost onequarter of agricultural production. Without Ukraine, the Soviet Union as it is known today would cease to exist. ,-'.- - Poised to Regain Independence. Today, after centuries of struggling for inde- . pendence from Russia, Poland, the Austro-Hungarian empire, the Soviet Union, and Nazi Germany, Ukraine appears poised to regain the independence it lost to $, . 1 Traditionally in English the word "Ukraine" is preceded by the definite article "the." Independence-minded U'krainiaqhowcver, consider this a linguistic artifact of Russian colwialism.Therefore, the article will not' .
  • Proquest Dissertations

    Proquest Dissertations

    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy sutxnitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter ^ce, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Leaming 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 ____ ® UMI THE EVOLUTION OF THE SLAVIC ‘BE(COME)’- TYPE COMPOUND FUTURE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marika Lynn Whaley, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2000 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr.