STUDIES in RUSSIAN and EAST EUROPEAN HISTORY and SOCIETY General Editors: R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STUDIES in RUSSIAN and EAST EUROPEAN HISTORY and SOCIETY General Editors: R STUDIES IN RUSSIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN HISTORY AND SOCIETY General Editors: R. W. Davies, Emeritus Professor of Soviet Economic Studies, and EA. Rees, Senior Lecturer in Soviet History, both at the Centre for Russian and East European Studies, The University of Birmingham Ukraine under Kuchma Political Reform, Economic Transformation and Security Policy in Independent Ukraine Taras Kuzio Research Fellow Centre for Russian and East European Studies The University o f Birmingham Бібліотека КНТЕУ 515848 ноз.еі* in association with the CENTRE FOR RUSSIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY IOF БШМЇІ'ФЯ ЇДМ '!--------- r ~ » Київськии національний торговельно-економічний університет БІБЛІОТЕКА All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P9HE. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. M J h F'rst published 1997 by W MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world ISBN 0-333-65414-5 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. 10 9876 54321 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98 97 Printed in Great Britain by The Ipswich Book Company, Suffolk A A Published in the United States of America by f y * ST. MARTIN’S PRESS, INC., Scholarly and Reference Division 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 ISBN 0-312-17625-2 Contents List of Tables IX List of Maps xi Acknowledgements xiii Transliteration Note XV Introduction 1 1 A New Ukrainian Parliament 6 On the Eve of Elections 6 Independent Ukraine under Kravchuk 6 The Multi-Party System 8 The Election Campaign 11 Parliamentary Election Law 11 Criticism of the Election Law 13 New Election Law 15 Electoral Blocs 16 Regional Divisions 22 The Aftermath 25 Issues 25 The Elections 26 By-elections 28 Violations 31 Conclusions 35 2 Issues and Voters in the 1994 Presidential Elections 39 Myths and Legends of the 1994 Presidential Elections 40 Issues 43 Statehood 43 Political Reform 45 The Economic Crisis and Reform 47 Organised Crime and Corruption 49 National Symbols and Language 50 Foreign and Defence Policy 51 Voters 55 Political Parties 55 Civic and Social Groups 59 v vi Contents Religion 59 The Armed Forces and Civil-Military Relations 60 Industrialists 61 Conclusion 64 3 The Crimea Returns to Ukraine 67 Elections in the Crimea 68 Presidential Elections 68 Ukrainian Reactions to the Presidential Elections 73 President Meshkov 74 Parliamentary Elections 77 Opinion Polls 79 Decline of the Russian Bloc 79 New Constitution 81 The ‘Separatist’ Constitution 81 The New Crimean Constitution 82 Ukrainian Reactions 83 An Honourable Solution is Found 85 Ukrainian Elections 86 Parliamentary Elections 86 Presidential Elections 87 Conclusions 89 4 Political Reform and an End to the Soviet System 90 Compromise and the Search for New Allies 91 Victory by a Small Margin 91 From Romanticism to Pragmatism 91 Compromises 93 A New Administration 95 Political Reform 99 Executive Power 99 The Threat of a Referendum 103 The Constitutional Agreement 105 Conflicting Interpretations 107 A New Constitution 110 The Soviet Ukrainian Constitution 110 The Kravchuk Constitutions 111 The Kuchma Constitution 116 Comparisons of Draft Constitutions 126 How Should the Constitution be Adopted? 131 Conclusions 134 Contents vii 5 Economic Transformation and Structural Change 137 Economic and Social Reform 138 A New Programme 138 Reform Speeded Up 139 The Rise of Yevhen Marchuk 142 Correction of Economic Reform 144 Fiscal and Monetary Reform 149 The Black Economy 152 Privatisation 153 Preconditions and Contradictions 153 The Pace of Privatisation 155 Parliament Suspends Privatisation 157 Privatisation Takes Off 159 Privatisation Fails to Meet Expectations 163 Land Privatisation 164 Western Assistance 168 Conclusions 173 6 New Foreign and Defence Policies 179 Foreign Policy 179 Priorities and Security Fears 179 New Foreign Policy Agenda 183 Ukraine and the Expansion of NATO 188 Ukrainian-Russian Relations: Diverging Interests 197 The Chechnya Crisis and Ukraine 203 Ukraine and the Russian Elections 206 Ukrainian-Russian Economic Relations 210 Military Policy 213 The Security Forces 213 The Black Sea Fleet 214 Ukrainian-Russian Military Co-operation 218 Nuclear Weapons 219 Conclusions 222 7 Conclusions 227 Notes 230 Bibliography of Selected Publications 267 Index 276 List of Tables 1.1 Pre-election Poll of Public Confidence 7 1.2 Pre-election Poll of Voter Disillusionment 7 1.3 Election Blocs 16 1.4 Democratic Coalition ‘Ukraine’ Election Bloc 17 1.5 The Evolution of Election Blocs 19 1.6 Regional Election Blocs 23 1.7 Pre-Election Poll of Voter Confidence 25 1.8 Negative Views within Ukrainian Society 25 1.9 Candidates Registered According to Party Affiliation 29 1.10 Political Profile of Candidates in the 7 April 1996 Repeat Elections 31 1.11 Members of Political Parties in the Ukrainian Parliament (as of 1 December 1994) 33 1.12 The Ukrainian Parliament According to Membership of Factions 36 1.13 Division of Parliament According to Political Orientation and Affiliation to Political Parties 37 3.1 Round 1 of the Presidential Elections in the Crimea (16 January 1994) 72 3.2 Round 2 of the Presidential Elections in the Crimea (30 January 1994) 72 3.3 Election Opinion Poll 79 3.4 Poll of Public Confidence in Crimean Institutions 80 3.5 Crimean Votes for Ukrainian Presidential Candidates (Round 1) 88 3.6 Crimean Votes for Ukrainian Presidential Candidates (Round 2) 88 4.1 Voting by Parliamentary Faction for the Constitutional Agreement 106 4.2 Opposition to the Constitutional Agreement by Parliamentary Faction 106 4.3 Vote by Faction for the Constitution (28 June 1996) 126 4.4 The Cabinet of Ministers According to the Draft Constitutions 129 4.5 Attitude of Political Groups to the Constitutional Process 133 ix X List of Tables 4.6 Members of Parliament Who Refused to Take the Ukrainian Oath of Loyalty (as Demanded by the Ukrainian Constitution) 135 5.1 Privatisation in Ukraine (as of 1994) 156 5.2 Land Auctions (1994) 166 5.3 Land Privatisation (1992-5) 166 5.4 Privatisation of the Agro-Industrial Sector 166 5.5 Privatisation in Ukraine (1992-4) 175 5.6 Presidential Programme of Privatisation of Medium to Large Enterprises (1995) 176 5.7 Presidential Programme of Privatisation of Small Units (1995) 177 5.8 Privatisation of Land (1995) 178 6.1 Opinion Poll of Ukrainian Attitudes to the CIS 191 6.2 Evolution of Russian Security Policy to Ukraine and the CIS 202 6.3 Attitude of Russian Political Groups to the CIS 223 6.4 Russian Foreign and Defence Policies and Ukrainian Objections 225 List of Maps 1. Ukraine 2. The variation of the vote for independence of Ukraine (December 1991). (Produced by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, the National University of the Kyiv Mohyla Academy.) 3. The variation of Kravchuk’s vote across the different regions (December 1991). (Produced by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, the National University of the Kyiv Mohyla Academy.) 4. The variation of Kravchuk’s vote across the different regions (July 1994). (Produced by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, the National University of the Kyiv Mohyla Academy.) 5. The share of the Ukrainian-speaking population of Ukraine. (Produced by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, the National University of the Kyiv Mohyla Academy.) Acknowledgements The author is grateful to the Michael and Daria Kowalsky Endowment Fund, administered by the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies of Edmonton, Alberta, for an award in 1993 which allowed him to undertake the initial research for this book. The author is also grateful to the editors of The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics,1 Jane’s Intelligence Review2 and Central Asian Survey3 for permission to publish materials which appeared in earlier and shorter versions in their publications. I would like gratefully to acknowledge the Leverhulme Trust for supporting the research project on the Transition from Soviet to Independent Ukraine’ from April 1995, at the Centre for Russian and East European Studies, The University of Birmingham, under its director, Professor Julian Cooper. 1. T. Kuzio, ‘The 1994 Parliamentary Elections in Ukraine’, The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 11, no. 4 (December 1995), pp. 335-61. 2. T. Kuzio, ‘Ukraine and the Expansion of NATO’, Jane’s Intelligence Review, vol. 7, no. 9 (September 1995), 389-91. 3. T. Kuzio, ‘The Chechen Crisis and the “Near Abroad’”, Central Asian Survey, vol. 14, no. 4 (1995), pp. 553-72 published by Carfax Publishing Company, PO Box 25, Abingdon, Oxfordshire 0X14 3UE. xiii Transliteration Note L’viv (Lvov) Uzhorod (Uzgorod) Rivne (Rovno) Kyiv (Kiev) Luts’k Zhitomir Chernihiv (Chernigov) Cherkasy (Cherkassy) Ivano-Frankivsk (Ivano-Frankovsk) Khmel’nyts’ky Vinnytsya Odesa (Odessa) Mykolayiv (Nikolaiv) Kherson Poltava Kirovohrad (Kirovograd) Krivyi Rih (Krivyi Rog) Zaporizhzhya (Zaporozhzhia) Dnipropetrovs’k (Dnepropetrovsk) Donets’k (Donetsk) Kharkiv (Kharkov) Chernivtsi (Chernovtsy) Sumy Luhans’k (Lugansk) Simferopol Sevastopol xv Chernihiv Zhytomyr Kharkhiv Khmel'nyts'kyi Ternopil' Poltava Cherkasy f% y ivano- * N Vinnytsia Uzhhorod NFrankivs’k Luhans'k Kirovohrad Dnipropetrovs'k Chernivtsi Donets'k Zaporizhzhis* Mykolaiv Qdesa Kherson Simferopoi' 1.
Recommended publications
  • Public Broadcasting in Ukraine
    РОЗДІЛ 1 ДЕРЖАВНЕ МОВЛЕННЯ: ВІД ПРОПАГАНДИ ДО АДМІНРЕСУРСУ Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai under the general editorship of Natalia Lyhachova Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: History of Creation and Challenges PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: HISTORY OF CREATION AND CHALLENGES IN UKRAINE: HISTORY OF CREATION PUBLIC BROADCASTING 1 2 Svitlana Ostapa, Vadym Miskyi, Ihor Rozkladai under the general editorship of Natalia Lyhachova PUBLIC BROADCASTING IN UKRAINE: History of Creation and Challenges UDC 654.19 О 76 Production of this brochure was made possible with the financial support from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark and the Government of Sweden. The content of the brochure is the sole responsibility of Detector Media NGO and does not necessarily reflect the po- sition of the National Endowment for Democracy, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, or the Government of Sweden. S.V. Ostapa, V.V. Miskyi, I.Ye. Rozkladai under the general editorship of Natalia Lyhachova. О 76 Public broadcasting in Ukraine: History of Creation and Challenges. — Kyiv: VIOL PRINTING HOUSE LLC, 2018. — 168 p. Fig. Media experts directly involved in the establishment of the Public Broadcasting in Ukraine reveal the history of the transformation of state broadcasters into the National Public Broadcasting Company of Ukraine. It was a path from advocating for the legislation necessary for the formation of a legal entity and its first steps. This brochure also describes the main challenges faced by the National Public Broadcasting Company of Ukraine at the end of the first two years of its operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine and the Yugoslav Conflict
    Nationalities Papers, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1997 UKRAINE AND THE YUGOSLAV CONFLICT Taras Kuzio Even before gaining independence in December 1991 from the former USSR, Ukraine had supported Slovenia and Croatia's drive to independence from the former Yugoslavia. In May 1991, Croatian President Franjo Tudjman paid an official visit to Ukraine where then parliamentary speaker Leonid Kravchuk expressed sympathy with Croatia's desire for independence. Tudjman pointed out how Ukraine's seat at the United Nations had given it a head start in obtaining international recognition of its independent status. On 12 December 1991, twelve days after the Ukrainian referendum on independence, Kyiv became one of the first states to diplomatically recognise Croatia and Slovenia; and further, it announced its readiness to open embassies in both countries.1 Ukraine was the first member of the U.N. to recognise Croatia; the second and third countries, Slovenia and Lithuania, were not members of the U.N. when they recognised Croatia. Ukraine's motives were quite clear early on vis-a-vis Yugoslavia. First, it wanted to reaffirm its independent status as a new international state. Secondly, Kyiv desired to distance itself from Russian sympathy with Serbia and Yugoslavia2 in order to show the outside world—particularly at that stage, the sceptical West—that Ukraine and Russia were indeed different peoples and nations.3 Fourthly, Ukraine desired to show the outside world that it was a respectable and co-operative member of the international community. Finally, a majority of the Ukrainian leadership sympathised with the Croats and Slovenes in their drive to independence, comparing it to Ukraine's quest to divorce itself from Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • What Future for Ukraine?
    OÂRODEK STUDIÓW WSCHODNICH Centre for Eastern Studies Dokàd zmierzasz, Ukraino? What Future for Ukraine? Anna Górska Warszawa, czerwiec 2005 / Warsaw, June 2005 © Copyright by OÊrodek Studiów Wschodnich © Copyright by Centre for Eastern Studies Redaktor serii / Series editor Anna ¸abuszewska Opracowanie graficzne / Graphic design Dorota Nowacka T∏umaczenie / Translation Izabela Zygmunt Wydawca / Publisher OÊrodek Studiów Wschodnich Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a Warszawa / Warsaw, Poland tel./phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 fax: +48 /22/ 525 80 40 Spis treÊci / Contents Dokàd zmierzasz, Ukraino? / 5 I. Trudny okres przejmowania w∏adzy / 6 II. Paƒstwo demokratyczne / 9 III. Paƒstwo prawa / 11 IV. Gospodarka rynkowa / 14 V. Czy Zachód mo˝e wspomóc Ukrain´ / 16 Za∏àcznik I / 18 Za∏àcznik II / 24 What Future for Ukraine? / 27 I. Difficult Period of the Transfer of Power / 28 II. A Democratic State / 31 III. A State of Law / 34 IV. Market Economy / 37 V. Can the West help Ukraine / 38 Appendix No 1 / 41 Appendix No 2 / 47 Dokàd zmierzasz, Ukraino? Min´∏o sto dni od inauguracji prezydenta Ukrainy Wiktora Juszczenki i po- wo∏ania nowego rzàdu z Julià Tymoszenko na czele, co tradycyjnie sk∏a- nia do pierwszych podsumowaƒ i oceny polityki nowych w∏adz. W przy- padku Ukrainy jest to szczególnie interesujàce. Zmiana w∏adzy nastàpi∏a w du˝ej mierze w wyniku antysystemowego protestu spo∏ecznego, okre- Êlanego jako pomaraƒczowa rewolucja1. W zasadzie Majdan nie formu- ∏owa∏ pozytywnych hase∏ programowych, a jedynie wyraziÊcie okreÊla∏, czego spo∏eczeƒstwo ju˝ nie akceptuje – samowoli w∏adzy, korupcji, bie- dy, k∏amstwa w najwy˝szych gabinetach i mediach, przedmiotowego traktowania spo∏eczeƒstwa, o którym w∏adza przypomina sobie jedynie w kampaniach wyborczych, ale i tak nie respektuje woli wyborców.
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics: Implications For
    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTIO N AUTHORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky Tönu Parming CONTRACTOR : University of Delawar e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky, Project Director an d Co-Principal Investigato r Tönu Parming, Co-Principal Investigato r COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 621- 9 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or in part fro m funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPLY FOR COPYRIGH T This work has been requested for manuscrip t review for publication . It is not to be quote d without express written permission by the authors , who hereby reserve all the rights herein . Th e contractual exception to this is as follows : The [US] Government will have th e right to publish or release Fina l Reports, but only in same forma t in which such Final Reports ar e delivered to it by the Council . Th e Government will not have the righ t to authorize others to publish suc h Final Reports without the consent o f the authors, and the individua l researchers will have the right t o apply for and obtain copyright o n any work products which may b e derived from work funded by th e Council under this Contract . ii EXEC 1 Overall Executive Summary HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTION by Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delawar e d Tönu Parming, University of Marylan August 1, 1975, after more than two years of intensive negotiations, 35 Head s of Governments--President Ford of the United States, Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada , Secretary-General Brezhnev of the USSR, and the Chief Executives of 32 othe r European States--signed the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperatio n in Europe (CSCE) .
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant Reconstruction Project
    NEDO —IC-00ER01 Feasibility Study of Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant Reconstruction Project IVIarch, 2001 New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) usted by: Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. 020005064 -9 Feasibility Study of Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant Reconstruction Project Entrusted by : Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. Prepared on : March, 2001 Study purpose This project has been framed to apply Scrap & Build project of 300MW Electric power plan, to the Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant owned by the JST Dneproenergo in the UKRAINE,. This project is aimed at improving the efficiency of aged facilities of the plant; enhancing its environment-friendliness; and reducing the emission of greenhouse gases. NEDO-IC —00ER01 Feasibility Study of Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant Reconstruction Project March, 2001 New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) Entrusted by: Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. Preface This Report is a result of the survey of the Feasibility Study of Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant Reconstruction Project, which Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. received consignment of New Energy Development and Industrial Technology Organization (NEDO) to conduct this study. In December 1997, the Third Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP3) was held in Kyoto. At the conference, the "Kyoto Protocol" was adopted in order to prevent global warming caused by greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide. It commits developed countries to reduce their average emissions of greenhouse gases by at least 5% "in the period 2008 - 15" from the 1990 level. Japan set its target of reduction at 6%. The Kyoto Protocol also provides measures to give flexibility in attaining the goals: "Joint Implementation (JI)" and "Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)." In JI, greenhouse gas reductions are shared among developed countries through implementation of specific international projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Opinion on the Draft Law on the Public Prosecutor's
    Strasbourg, 14 October 2013 CDL-AD(2013)025 Opinion no. 735 / 2013 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) DIRECTORATE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (DHR), DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RULE OF LAW JOINT OPINION ON THE DRAFT LAW ON THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF UKRAINE Endorsed by the Venice Commission at its 96th Plenary Session (Venice, 11-12 October 2013) on the basis of comments by Mr Nicolae ESANU (Member, Moldova) Mr Peter PACZOLAY (Member, Hungary) Ms Hanna SUCHOCKA (Member, Poland) Mr Kaarlo TUORI (Member, Finland) Mr Jeremy McBRIDE (DHR consultant, United Kingdom) Mr Eric SVANIDZE (DHR consultant, Georgia) Ms Lorena BACHMAIER WINTER (DHR consultant, Spain) Mr Mikael LYNGBO (DHR consultant, Denmark) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2013)025 - 2 - Contents I. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 3 II. General remarks ................................................................................................................. 3 III. Main criticism expressed in previous opinions ............................................................... 4 A. Excessive centralisation combined with the dependence of the Prosecutor General on the confidence of Parliament. .................................................................. 5 B. Prosecutors’ role outside the criminal justice system .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • 歐盟與俄羅斯在烏克蘭危機中之利益競合the Competing Interests Between the EU and Russia in the Crisis of Ukraine
    南 華 大 學 國際事務與企業學系歐洲研究碩士班 碩士論文 歐盟與俄羅斯在烏克蘭危機中之利益競合 The Competing Interests between the EU and Russia in the Crisis of Ukraine 研 究 生:張家豪 指導教授:鍾志明 中華民國 106 年 6 月 26 日 南華大學 國際事務與企業學系 歐洲研究碩士班 碩士學位論文 、、、電 歐盟與俄羅斯在烏克蘭危機中之利益競合 The Competing Interests between the EU and Russia in the Crisis of Ukraine 研究生:朱永多 經考試合格特此證明 口試委員: 給州: 指導教授: 主 長 口試日期:中華民國 -0六年六月二十六日 摘 要 1991 年 12 月,前蘇聯加盟共和國的十一位領導人簽署了阿拉木圖宣言;正式 宣告蘇聯中止存在,獨立 國家國協成立。其中,位處波羅的海到黑海中樞位置的 烏克蘭,是個擁有豐富林、礦產業、蘊藏大量煤礦與天然氣資源的國家,而其土 地面積在 東歐大陸上僅次於俄羅斯。1993 年馬斯垂克條約生效,歐洲聯盟正式形 成,為擴大周邊區域的穩定,乃採睦鄰政策,與鄰近國家進行策略結合,整合彼 此 資源、獲取雙邊外交或經濟實需;而位置重要的烏克蘭,自然是歐盟極力爭取 的合作對象。但是,長期作為俄羅斯附庸國的烏克蘭,早已被俄羅斯視為藩屬; 即便獨立國協早已成立,但俄國對烏國的霸權主義及己身國際戰略考量,仍不願 樂見烏克蘭和歐盟、甚至西方國家有密切互動。2013 年烏克蘭爆發政治危機,俄 羅斯以維護安全為藉口派兵進入烏國,歐洲大陸上俄羅斯與歐盟的政經角力,也 再次浮現至檯面上。本文試圖從烏克蘭危機中歐盟與俄羅斯的外交處理方式,探 討烏克蘭在歐洲大陸上的利益競合與未來雙方外交可能面臨的挑戰。 關鍵詞:歐盟、烏克蘭、俄羅斯、睦鄰政策、利益競合 I Summary The dissolution of the Soviet Union and the establishment of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) had been officially announced and realized after the Alma Ata Declaration was signed by 11 leaders of the Soviet Socialist Republics. The Ukraine, the second largest country of Eastern Eurpoe, is located in the pivot of Black Sea and Bsltic Sea. The country is aboundanted in nature resources, such as, woods, mines, coal mines, and gas. The Maastricht Treaty, entered into force since 1993, marked the beginning of formation of the EU. The European Neighbourhood Policy was undertaken in consideration of strategy combination, resource integration, bilateral diplomacy and economic corporation with the neighboring countries. As the result of above, it is reasonable that the Ukraine was certainly the first priority for the EU which they were targeted to buy off for aligment.
    [Show full text]
  • Separatists and Russian Nationalist-Extremist Allies of The
    Separatists and Russian nationalist-extremist allies of the Party of Regions call for union with Russia Today at 17:38 | Taras Kuzio The signing of an accord to prolong the Black Sea Fleet in the Crimea by 25 years not only infringes the Constitution again, but also threatens Ukraine’s territorial integrity. If a president is willing to ignore the Constitution on two big questions in less than two months in office, what will he have done to the Constitution after 60 months in office? As somebody wrote on my Facebook profile yesterday, the Constitution is now “toilet paper.” The threat to Ukraine’s territorial integrity is deeper. Since President Viktor Yanukovych’s election, Russian nationalist-extremist allies of the Party of Regions have begun to radicalize their activities. Their mix of Russophile and Sovietophile ideological views are given encouragement by cabinet ministers such as Minister of Education Dmytro Tabachnyk and First Deputy Prime Minister Volodymyr Semynozhenko. Calls, which look increasingly orchestrated, are made to change Ukraine’s national anthem, adopt Russian as a state language, transform Ukraine into a federal state and coordinate the writing of educational textbooks with Russia. On Monday, Russian nationalist-extremist allies of the Party of Regions in the Crimea organized a meeting on the anniversary of the Crimea’s annexation by the Russian empire that demanded a full military, political and economic union with Russia. Russian nationalist-extremists in the Crimea were marginalized by ex-President Leonid Kuchma after he abolished the Crimean presidential institution in 1995. Then Deputy Prime Minister Yevhen Marchuk undertook measures to subvert and undermine the Russian nationalist-extremists who came to power in the peninsula in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Foreign Policy Change in Transitional States
    Explaining Foreign Policy Change in Transitional States: A Case Study of Ukraine between Two Revolutions By © 2017 Lidiya Zubytska M.A., University of Notre Dame, 2004 B.A., Ivan Franko National University of L’viv, 2002 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Political Science and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Mariya Omelicheva Robert Rohrschneider Nazli Avdan Steven Maynard-Moody Erik Herron Date Defended: 24 July 2017 The dissertation committee for Lidiya Zubytska certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Explaining Foreign Policy Change in Transitional States: A Case Study of Ukraine between Two Revolutions Chair: Mariya Omelicheva Date Approved: 24 July 2017 ii ABSTRACT Over the span of a decade, Ukraine saw two revolutions that rocked its political and social life to the very core. The Orange revolution of 2004, a watershed event in the post-Soviet history of East European states, reversed the authoritarian trend in the country and proclaimed its course for democracy and integration with the European Union. However, reforms and electoral promises of the revolutionary leaders quickly turned into shambles, and instead another pro- Russian authoritarian leader consolidated power. As Ukrainian political elites vacillated between closer ties with the EU to its west and the Russian Federation to its east, the 2014 Revolution of Dignity rose again to defend the European future for Ukraine. In this work, I investigate the driving forces shaping foreign policymaking in Ukraine during these years. I posit that it was precisely because such policies were shaped in an uncertain post-revolutionary transitional political environment that we are able to see seemingly contradictory shifts in Ukraine’s relations with the EU and Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Elections in Ukraine, 1998
    COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE 234 FORD HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 (202) 225-1901 EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] INTERNET WEB SITE: http://www.house.gov/csce UKRAINE’S PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION March 29, l998 A Report Prepared by the Staff of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe April 1998 Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe 234 Ford House Office Building Washington, DC 20515-6460 (202) 225-1901 [email protected] http://www.house.gov/csce/ ALFONSE D’AMATO, New York, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, Co-Chairman JOHN EDWARD PORTER, Illinois BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan MATT SALMON, Arizona CONRAD BURNS, Montana JON CHRISTENSEN, Nebraska OLYMPIA SNOWE, Maine STENY H. HOYER, Maryland FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts HARRY REID, Nevada BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland BOB GRAHAM, Florida LOUISE MCINTOSH SLAUGHTER, New York RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin Executive Branch HON. JOHN H. F. SHATTUCK, Department of State VACANT, Department of Defense VACANT, Department of Commerce ________________________ Professional Staff MICHAEL R. HATHAWAY, Chief of Staff DOROTHY DOUGLAS TAFT, Deputy Chief of Staff E. WAYNE MERRY, Senior Advisor MARIA COLL, Office Administrator OREST DEYCHAKIWSKY, Staff Advisor JOHN FINERTY, Staff Advisor CHADWICK R. GORE, Communications Director ROBERT HAND, Staff Advisor JANICE HELWIG, Staff Advisor (Vienna) MARLENE KAUFMANN, Counsel for International Trade SANDY LIST, GPO Liaison KAREN S. LORD, Counsel for Freedom of Religion RONALD MCNAMARA, Staff Advisor MICHAEL OCHS, Staff Advisor ERIKA B. SCHLAGER, Counsel for International Law ii ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION (OSCE) The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the Helsinki pro- cess, traces its origin to the signing of the Helsinki Final Act in Finland on August 1, 1975, by the leaders of 33 European countries, the United States and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oligarchic Democracy: the Influence of Business Groups On
    42 THE OLIGARCHIC DEMOCRACY THE INFLUENCE OF BUSINESS GROUPS ON UKRAINIAN POLITICS Sławomir Matuszak NUMBER 42 WARSAW September 2012 THE OLIGARCHIC DEMOCRACY THE INFLUENCE OF BUSINESS GROUPS ON UKRAINIAN POLITICS Sławomir Matuszak © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies Content EDitors Adam Eberhardt, Wojciech Konończuk EDitorS Anna Łabuszewska Katarzyna Kazimierska Translation Ilona Duchnowicz CO-operation Nicholas Furnival Graphic Design Para-buch CHARTS Wojciech Mańkowski PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Shutterstock DTP GroupMedia Publisher Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978-83-62936-14-4 Contents THESES /5 MAIN SEctORS OF BUSINESS ActIVITY OF THE KEY UKRAINIAN OLIGARCHS /8 INTRODUctION /9 RESERVATIONS /11 I. THE EMERGENCE OF THE OLIGARCHIC SYSTEM AND ITS FORM IN 1991–2004 /13 1. The genesis of the oligarchic system /13 2. The formation of the clans /13 3. The beginnings of a system crisis /17 4. The Orange Revolution /20 II. THE OLIGARCHS IN 2005–2010 /23 1. The orange ‘oligarchic democracy’ /25 1.1. The business circles linked to the Party of Regions /26 1.2. ‘Orange’ business /27 1.3. The others /30 2. Tymoshenko’s conflict with the RUE Group /32 3. The attempt to form a grand coalition /32 4. The presidential election of 2010 /34 III. THE OLIGARCHS AFTER VIKTOR YANUKOVYCH’S VIctORY /37 1. The key groups of influence in the state administration/37 2. ‘The family’ – an attempt at a new quality /40 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Opinion on Draft Amendments to Legislation on The
    Strasbourg, Warsaw, 14 October 2013 CDL-AD(2013)026 Or. Engl. Opinion no 734/2013 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) AND OSCE/OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) JOINT OPINION ON DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO LEGISLATION ON THE ELECTION OF PEOPLE’S DEPUTIES OF UKRAINE Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 96th Plenary Session (Venice, 11-12 October 2013) on the basis of comments by Mr Peter PACZOLAY (Member, Hungary) Mr Jessie PILGRIM (Legal Expert, OSCE/ODIHR) _________________________________________________________________________________ This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int -2- CDL-AD(2013)026 TABLE OF CONTENT I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 5 III. Comments on the July 2013 draft amendments ......................................................... 6 A. Electoral System, Suffrage Rights and Basic Principles .......................................... 6 B. Territorial Organisation of Elections ........................................................................ 8 C. Election Commissions ............................................................................................ 9 D. Voter Lists ............................................................................................................ 10
    [Show full text]