DELINEATION OF LINGUOPERSONOLOGY AND LINGUOAXIOLOGY ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY IN POZNAN Tetyana Kosmeda, Anatolij Zahnitko, Zhanna Krasnobaieva-Chorna DELINEATION OF LINGUOPERSONOLOGY AND LINGUOAXIOLOGY POZNAN 2019 3 Reviewers Professor, Doctor of Philology Pshemislav Yuzvikevich – Wroclaw University (Poland) / dr hab. prof. UWr Przemysław Jóźwikiewicz – Uniwersytet Wrocławski (Polska) This publication was financed by the Institute of Russian and Ukrainian Studies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan © Tetyana Kosmeda, Anatolij Zahnitko, Zhanna Krasnobaieva-Chorna This edition © Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu 2019, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2019 Published on the basis of an authorised copy Graphic design of the cover: Ewa Wąsowska Technical editor: Dorota Borowiak Formatting text: Eugeniusz Strykowski ISВN 978-83-232-3536-1 WYDAWNICTWO NAUKOWE UNIWERSYTETU IM. ADAMA MICKIEWICZA W POZNANIU 61-701 POZNAŃ, UL. FREDRY 10 Sekretariat: tel. 61 829 46 46, faks 61 829 46 47, e-mail: [email protected] Dział Promocji i Sprzedaży: tel. 61 829 46 40, e-mail: [email protected] Ark. wyd. 16,25. Ark. druk. 15,875 DRUK I OPRAWA: VOLUMINA.PL DANIEL KRZANOWSKI, SZCZECIN, UL. KS. WITOLDA 7–9 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1 CATEGORIES, LEVELS AND UNITS OF LINGUOPERSONOLOGY (A. Zahnitko) ............................................................................ 15 1.1. Categorical and paradigm scope of modern linguopersonology ..... 15 1.2. The theory of modern linguopersonology levels and categories ..... 25 CHAPTER 2 THE THEORY OF LINGUOPERSONEME: THE TYPOLOGY OF LINGUO- INDIVIDUATIONS AND LINGUOINDIVIDUALIZATIONS (A. Zahnitko) .... 38 2.1. Language personality in epistolary discourse: the typology of linguoindividuations and linguoindividualizations ................... 38 2.2. Communicative and discourse scope of the language personality of Ivan Franko ................................................................... 45 2.3. Grammatical conception of Yurii Shevelov: evolution of views (1940‒1950) .................................................................... 58 2.4. Language existentiality of Vasyl Stus: artistic-speech scope .......... 66 2.5. Psycholinguistic model of linguopersonality: categorical and level scope ........................................................................... 93 CHAPTER 3 EGO-TEXT LINGUISTICS: THEORETICAL OUTLINE ASPECTUAL APPRO- ACHES TO THE PRIVATE LETTER ANALYSIS (T. Kosmeda) ............... 97 3.1. Ego-text and its main genres (diary, memoirs, autobiography, letter). General characteristics .............................................. 98 3.1.1. Formation of the concept of ego-text in modern linguistics. Its dependance on the psychological cathegories of Ego and Alter Ego ............................................................... 100 3.1.2. Main genres of ego-text or types of personal texts. .............. 114 3.2. The genre of the letter. The discursive (stylistic) potential of the epistolary. The state of study of the problem ............................ 120 5 3.3. Lesya Ukrainka’s elite linguopersonality in the mirror of her private letters (case study of the poet’s epistolary and her reflections on letters in literary texts) ...................................................... 127 3.3.1. Lesya Ukrainka’s attitude to the phenomenon of correspon- dence (some comments on letters and the process of their writing in the poet’s artistic texts). ................................. 127 3.3.2. Lesya Ukrainka’s private letters as “a reflection” of her speech and the most intimate movements of her soul. ......... 129 CHAPTER 4 QUALIFYING BASES OF AXIOPHRASEME PRAGMATICS (Zh. Krasno- baieva-Chorna) ......................................................................... 147 4.1. Axiophraseme pragmatics as a section of linguistics ................... 147 4.2. The specifics of the phrasemic evaluation: theoretical and applied foundations ................................................................... 148 4.2.1. To the question of the evaluative component of the phrasemic meaning ................................................................ 148 4.2.2. Typology of phrasemes according to their evaluation load .... 150 4.2.2.1. Positively evaluative phrasemes .......................... 150 4.2.2.2. Negatively evaluative phrasemes ............................... 157 4.2.2.3. Neutrally evaluative phraseme ........................... 164 4.2.2.4. Phrasemes with diffuse evaluation ....................... 165 4.3. The algorithm of reconstruction of the axiological world’s image in phrasemics .................................................................... 168 4.3.1. Stage 1. The research illustrative corpus .......................... 169 4.3.2. Stage 2. A nomenclature of universal values ..................... 169 4.3.3. Stage 3. The level model of the axiological world’s image ..... 170 4.3.4. Stage 4. Phrasemic axiological oppositions of values ........... 170 4.3.5. Stage 5. The ideographic parametrization of values ............. 172 4.3.6. Stage 6. The level organization of values .......................... 180 4.3.7. Stage 7. Cultural coding of values .................................. 185 4.3.8. Stage 8. Cultural coding of axiological world’s image .......... 192 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................ 200 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................... 205 List of sources ..................................................................... 224 Bibliography [References] ....................................................... 225 List of sources [References] ...................................................... 249 ESSAYS ON LINGUOPERSONOLOGY AND LINGUOAXIOLOGY (Summary) ............................................................................ 251 6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Axiological World’s Image – AWI Conversational – conver. Derogatory – derog. Disapprovingly – disappr. Ethnographic – ethnogr. Familiar – fam. German – Germ. Invective – invect. Ironical – ironic. Literary – liter. Obsolete form – obsol. Playful – playf. Phrasemic Axiological Oppositions – PhAO Phraseme-Semantical Groups – PhSG Phraseme-Semantical Subgroups – PhSSG Russian – Russ. Solemn style – solemn Ukrainian – Ukr. Vernacular – vernac. Vulgar – vulg. 7 8 INTRODUCTION Linguopersonology is a part of linguistic science which concentra- tes attention on studying of language personality in its integrity. Lan- guage personality is a totality of all language abilities and realizations of the personality where language personality has two main concep- tual dimensions – monopersonologic and polypersonologic. The first represents a separate language individuality in the whole scope of their expressions – temporal, spatial, evolutional, cultural and aesthe- tic, social, linguocultural and others. Language personality in their formation goes through two main periods of linguoindividuational expressions: 1) externally personologic when the potential of langua- ge abilities is formed spontaneously as a self-formation of individuali- ty through the strengthening of “I”, the determination of one’s own main function and dominant directive, the development of a peculiar “mask” through which the individual activates, accommodates to the reQuirement of the society; 2) internally personologic in which “the initiation into internal reality” becomes the most active, profound self-cognition as well as cognition of the human nature is functionally loaded. Within this period, everything that was earlier cognized and accumulated is internally analyzed, with the formation of the integral picture of self-awareness, internal and external connection with the Universe, fixed world arrangement. Within the first period of linguo- individuation, the personality acQuires sufficient resources for realiza- tion, self-acknowledgement and gaining the corresponding level of recognizability. The principle of system and the principle of contrastiveness are functionally topical in linguopersonology. The integrity of the de- scription of linguoperson is based on the first principle, demanding the processing of the description model with consecutive analysis of the collection of factors and parameters, motivators and indicators of 9 language realization of the personality. The differentiation of the ver- bal and non-verbal values of language personality is also rather im- portant. The second principle provides an adeQuate analysis of lingu- operson on the basis of comparison providing corresponding commenting of certain peculiarities of language behaviour of the per- sonality, their expression in different life periods and in correspon- ding social surroundings, the realization of mono-, bi- or polylingual intentions by the communicant. The main categories of linguopersonology include the categories of person, linguoperson, personalism. The category of person and/or linguoperson comprises the investigation of their needs comprising five binary foundations (by H. Murray): 1) primary (the needs of the body) – secondary (psychogenic) need; 2) open (assumptive in consciousness) – latent (excluded from consciousness) need; 3) focal (connected with certain object) – diffuse (do not depend on certain objects) need; 4) proactive (the reaction on internal factors) – reactive (the reaction on the factors