<<

Chandra Observations of Relativistic AGN Jets

Dan Schwartz Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

TEXAS AT STANFORD 2004 December 15 Observations of Extragalactic X-ray Jets 3C 273 BC: 3 Clear Detections Cen A: Feigelson et al. 10" = 29kpc Chandra Launched: Jets start rollingM87: in.Biretta et al. CE: 3 Fields of Investigation • Interactions with gas in Seyferts, radio , clusters.

• FR I and BL Lac jets. • , Powerful Radio Sources, and Cosmology. Observations of Extragalactic X-ray Jets BC: 3 Clear Detections Chandra Launched: Jets start rolling in. WHY? Angular Resolution!

3C 273

10" = 27 kpc

3C 273

0.5 to 7 keV 10" = 27 kpc

10" = 29kpc 3C 273

0.5 to 7 keV INTRODUCTION

•WhatDoJetsDo? – Carry large quantities of energy, to feed radio lobes – Significant part of energy generation budget – Interact with gas in galaxies and clusters of galaxies INTRODUCTION

•WhatDoJetsDo? – Carry large quantities of energy, to feed radio lobes – Significant part of black hole energy generation budget – Interact with gas in galaxies and clusters of galaxies •WhatDoWeWanttoLearn –Particlecomposition and acceleration – Jet acceleration and collimation INTRODUCTION

•WhatDoJetsDo? – Carry large quantities of energy, to feed radio lobes – Significant part of black hole energy generation budget – Interact with gas in galaxies and clusters of galaxies •WhatDoWeWanttoLearn –Particlecomposition and acceleration – Jet acceleration and collimation • Why Do We Need X-Ray Data? – Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) gives mechanism – Particle lifetimes change with observed band PKS 0637-752

z=0.653 0.5-7 keV X-rays

8.6 GHz

K1 K2 K3 K4

11"=76 kpc PKS 0637-752

z=0.653 0.5-7 keV X-rays

8.6 GHz

K1 K2 K3 K4

11"=76 kpc Spectral Energy Distribution often indicates against Synchrotron X-rays

PKS 1030-357

Quasar 12" = 109 kpc

K 1

Quasar K 3

K 3 K 1 K 2 K 2

5" = 43 kpc

Quasar

10" = 72 kpc K 1

Knot 2

Knot 1

5" = 40.3 kpc K 2 Quasar Spectral Energy Distribution often indicates against Synchrotron X-rays

AB

A B

A B A B

Sambruna et al., 2002ApJ...571..206S Spectral Energy Distribution often indicates against Synchrotron X-rays

Inverse Compton X- rays from the CMB:

2−3 γx ≈10 4−5 γr ≈10

Some jets may be de- tectable by GLAST, at 10−13 to 10−12 ergs cm−2 s−1

Sambruna et al., 2002ApJ...571..206S PKS 0637-752 Jet Spectrum 600

400

200

0 0510 110 Confront IC/CMB with Morphology

1000

100

10

1 024681012 Confront IC/CMB with Morphology Naive Models 1000

100

10

1 024681012 Confront IC/CMB with Morphology Naive Models

Siemiginowska et al. 2002 ApJ...570..543S PKS 1127-145 at z=1.187

PKS 1421-490 Images Gelbord et al. a) b) c)

A1 B A2

C N

5’’ E

0 ATCA 20 GHz Magellan i Chandra 0.5–7keV PKS 1421-490 Spectra Gelbord et al.

Core Model Jet Model Radio–Optical: Synchrotron Radio–Optical: Synchrotron Equipartition Equipartition B=13mG, Γ=20, θ=2.9◦ B=85mG 20≤ γ ≤ 104 104 ≤ γ ≤ 2 × 106 3 γbreak = 10 X-ray: Upstream Comptonization? X-ray: SSC • Determined B and δ within a factor of 2 • Kinetic flux is ∝ (Bδ)2, for equipartition 20

15

10

5

5 1015202530 Kinetic Flux 20 •K=Γ2π r2β cU • U is total internal energy

15 density, UB+Ue+Up • For equipartition, 2 10 B U= 8π (2 + k) • NOTE: K constant ⇒ 2 5 (B Γ) = constant

5 1015202530 Kinetic Flux 20 •K=Γ2π r2β cU • U is total internal energy

15 density, UB+Ue+Up • For equipartition, 2 10 B U= 8π (2 + k) • NOTE: K constant ⇒ 2 5 (B Γ) = constant •WetakeΓ ≈ δ = Γ − −1 5 1015202530δ ( (1 β cos(θ))) − •cos(θ ) = √δ 1/δ max (δ2−1) Kinetic Flux 10 From K =Γ2π r2β cU,

∝ 2 2 2 K δ θr(3 B /(8 π))

1

0.1 100 1000 Kinetic Flux From K =Γ2π r2β cU,

∝ 2 2 2 K δ θr(3 B /(8 π))

Kinetic flux is a signif- icant, even dominant, portion of the accretion energy budget. Implications of the AGN Jets • Eddington might not limit Accretion Rate

• Jets may Power Cluster Cavities – Stop Cooling Flows

• IC/CMB X-ray jets Maintain Constant Surface Brightness vs. z. We will detect them at Arbitrarily Large . 100

10

0.1 1 10 100

10

0.1 1 10 100

10

0.1 1 10 100

10

0.1 1 10 Where ARE the bright X-ray Jets at High Redshift? • Unidentified ROSAT sources? • Bright ROSAT, ASCA, EINSTEIN quasar identifications? • Extreme X-ray/Optical sources (Koekemoer et al. 2004ApJ...600L.123K) in Chandra Deep Surveys? Where ARE the bright X-ray Jets at High Redshift?

3" = 20kpc

GB 1508+5714 z=4.3

Siemiginowska et al. 2003ApJ...598L..15S Cheung,2004ApJ...600L..23C Two more High Redshift X-ray Jets: Cheung et al. Poster 1613

2 arcsec ~ 14 kpc

Quasar 1745+624 = 4C +62.29 at z=3.889

PMN J2219-2719 at z=3.634 There Could Be Radio Quiet X-Ray Jets!

• 1 keV X-rays produced by γ ≈ 1000/Γ • ν =4.2×10−6γ2 H[µG] ≈ 10 MHz

1000 0246810 There Could Be Radio Quiet X-Ray Jets!

• 1 keV X-rays produced by γ ≈ 1000/Γ • ν =4.2×10−6γ2 H[µG] ≈ 10 MHz

109 GB 1508+5714

108 (Jy Hz) ν F ν 107

6 z=4.3 10 1000 0246810 108 1010 1012 1014 1016 1018 Frequency (Hz) Cheung,2004ApJ...600L..23C A Radio Quiet X-Ray Jet?

EMSS 0841+1314 z=1.8661

30" 13 11 20 15 13 11 30 10

05 (J2000) 00

10 55

08 41 29.0 28.5 28.0 27.5 (J2000) 15 J0841

00 DECLINATION (J2000)

10 45 30" = 273 kpc f8.6GHz ≤ 100µJy Correlation of X-ray Jet and Radio Flux Densities Significance of the X-ray Emission

1. X-rays dominate power radiated by jet 2. SED through X-ray band provides clues to structure. • Acceleration sites • Deceleration of bulk motion • Proton content Significance of the X-ray Emission If emission is inverse Compton on the Cosmic Microwave Background 3. X-rays give the effective Doppler factor, rest frame B, and electron γmin 4. X-ray jets will be detectable at arbitrarily large redshift!