DOCSLIB.ORG

Observational Cosmology - 30H Course 218.163.109.230 Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Observational Cosmology - 30H Course 218.163.109.230 Et Al Observational cosmology - 30h course 218.163.109.230 et al. (2004–2014) PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 03:42:03 UTC Contents Articles Observational cosmology 1 Observations: expansion, nucleosynthesis, CMB 5 Redshift 5 Hubble's law 19 Metric expansion of space 29 Big Bang nucleosynthesis 41 Cosmic microwave background 47 Hot big bang model 58 Friedmann equations 58 Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric 62 Distance measures (cosmology) 68 Observations: up to 10 Gpc/h 71 Observable universe 71 Structure formation 82 Galaxy formation and evolution 88 Quasar 93 Active galactic nucleus 99 Galaxy filament 106 Phenomenological model: LambdaCDM + MOND 111 Lambda-CDM model 111 Inflation (cosmology) 116 Modified Newtonian dynamics 129 Towards a physical model 137 Shape of the universe 137 Inhomogeneous cosmology 143 Back-reaction 144 References Article Sources and Contributors 145 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 148 Article Licenses License 150 Observational cosmology 1 Observational cosmology Observational cosmology is the study of the structure, the evolution and the origin of the universe through observation, using instruments such as telescopes and cosmic ray detectors. Early observations The science of physical cosmology as it is practiced today had its subject material defined in the years following the Shapley-Curtis debate when it was determined that the universe had a larger scale than the Milky Way galaxy. This was precipitated by observations that established the size and the dynamics of the cosmos that could be explained by Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. In its infancy, cosmology was a speculative science based on a very limited number of observations and characterized by a dispute between steady state theorists and promoters of Big Bang cosmology. It was not until the 1990s and beyond that the astronomical observations would be able to eliminate competing theories and drive the science to the "Golden Age of Cosmology" which was heralded by David Schramm at a National Academy of Sciences colloquium in 1992.[1] Hubble's Law and the cosmic distance ladder Distance measurements in astronomy have historically been and continue to be confounded by considerable measurement uncertainty. In particular, while stellar parallax can be used to measure the distance to nearby stars, the observational limits imposed by the difficulty in measuring the minuscule parallaxes associated with objects beyond our galaxy meant that astronomers had to look for alternative ways to measure cosmic distances. To this end, a standard candle measurement for Cepheid variables was discovered by Henrietta Swan Leavitt in 1908 which would provide Edwin Hubble with the rung on the cosmic distance ladder he would need to determine the distance to spiral nebula. Hubble used the 100-inch Hooker Telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory to identify individual stars in those galaxies, and determine the distance to the galaxies by isolating individual Cepheids. This firmly established the spiral nebula as being objects well outside the Milky Way galaxy. Determining the distance to "island universes", as they were dubbed in the popular media, established the scale of the universe and settled the Shapley-Curtis debate once and for all.[2] In 1927, by combining various measurements, including Hubble's distance measurements and Vesto Slipher's determinations of redshifts for these objects, Georges Lemaître was the first to estimate a constant of proportionality between galaxies' distances and what was termed their "recessional velocities", finding a value of about 600 km/s/Mpc. He also showed that this was theoretically expected by using arguments from general relativity. Two years later, Hubble showed that the relation between the distances and velocities appeared to be a positive correlation. This correlation would come to be known as Hubble's Law and would serve as the observational foundation for the expanding universe theories on which cosmology is still based. The publication of the observations by Slipher, Wirtz, Hubble and their colleagues and the acceptance by the theorists of their theoretical implications in light of Einstein's General theory of relativity is considered the beginning of the modern science of cosmology.[3] Observational cosmology 2 Nuclide abundances Determination of the cosmic abundance of elements has a history dating back to early spectroscopic measurements of light from astronomical objects and the identification of emission and absorption lines which corresponded to particular electronic transitions in chemical elements identified on Earth. For example, the element Helium was first identified through its spectroscopic signature in the Sun before it was isolated as a gas on Earth.[4][5] Computing relative abundances was achieved through corresponding spectroscopic observations to measurements of the elemental composition of meteorites. Detection of the cosmic microwave background A cosmic microwave background was predicted in 1948 by George Gamow and Ralph Alpher, and by Alpher and Robert Herman as due to the hot big bang model. Moreover, Alpher and Herman were able to estimate the temperature,[6] but their results were not widely discussed in the community. Their prediction was rediscovered by Robert Dicke and Yakov Zel'dovich in the early 1960s with the first published recognition of the CMB radiation as a detectable phenomenon appeared in a brief paper by Soviet astrophysicists A. G. Doroshkevich and Igor Novikov, in the spring of 1964. In 1964, David Todd Wilkinson and Peter Roll, Dicke's colleagues at Princeton University, began constructing a Dicke radiometer to measure the cosmic microwave background.[7] In 1965, Arno Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson at the Crawford Hill location of Bell Telephone Laboratories in nearby Holmdel Township, New Jersey had built a Dicke radiometer that they intended to use for radio astronomy and satellite communication experiments. Their instrument had an excess 3.5 K antenna temperature which they could not account for. After receiving a telephone call from Crawford Hill, Dicke famously quipped: "Boys, we've been scooped."[8] A meeting between the Princeton and Crawford Hill groups determined that the antenna temperature was indeed due to the microwave background. Penzias and Wilson received the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics for their discovery. Modern observations Today, observational cosmology continues to test the predictions of theoretical cosmology and has led to the refinement of cosmological models. For example, the observational evidence for dark matter has heavily influenced theoretical modeling of structure and galaxy formation. When trying to calibrate the Hubble diagram with accurate supernova standard candles, observational evidence for dark energy was obtained in the late 1990s. These observations have been incorporated into a six-parameter framework known as the Lambda-CDM model which explains the evolution of the universe in terms of its constituent material. This model has subsequently been verified by detailed observations of the cosmic microwave background, especially through the WMAP experiment. Included here are the modern observational efforts that have directly influenced cosmology. Redshift surveys With the advent of automated telescopes and improvements in spectroscopes, a number of collaborations have been made to map the universe in redshift space. By combining redshift with angular position data, a redshift survey maps the 3D distribution of matter within a field of the sky. These observations are used to measure properties of the large-scale structure of the universe. The Great Wall, a vast supercluster of galaxies over 500 million light-years wide, provides a dramatic example of a large-scale structure that redshift surveys can detect.[9] The first redshift survey was the CfA Redshift Survey, started in 1977 with the initial data collection completed in 1982.[10] More recently, the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey determined the large-scale structure of one section of the Universe, measuring z-values for over 220,000 galaxies; data collection was completed in 2002, and the final data set was released 30 June 2003.[11] (In addition to mapping large-scale patterns of galaxies, 2dF established an upper limit on neutrino mass.) Another notable investigation, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), is ongoing as of 2011[12] and aims to obtain measurements on around 100 million objects.[13] SDSS has recorded redshifts for Observational cosmology 3 galaxies as high as 0.4, and has been involved in the detection of quasars beyond z = 6. The DEEP2 Redshift Survey uses the Keck telescopes with the new "DEIMOS" spectrograph; a follow-up to the pilot program DEEP1, DEEP2 is designed to measure faint galaxies with redshifts 0.7 and above, and it is therefore planned to provide a complement to SDSS and 2dF. Cosmic microwave background experiments Subsequent to the discovery of the CMB, hundreds of cosmic microwave background experiments had been conducted to measure and characterize the signatures of the radiation. The most famous experiment is probably the NASA Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite that orbited in 1989–1996 and which detected and quantified the large-scale anisotropies at the limit of its detection capabilities. Inspired by the initial COBE results of an extremely isotropic and homogeneous background, a series of ground-based and balloon-based
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Global Jet Structure of the Archetypical Quasar 3C 273
    galaxies Article The Global Jet Structure of the Archetypical Quasar 3C 273 Kazunori Akiyama 1,2,3,*, Keiichi Asada 4, Vincent L. Fish 2 ID , Masanori Nakamura 4, Kazuhiro Hada 3 ID , Hiroshi Nagai 3 and Colin J. Lonsdale 2 1 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Haystack Observatory, 99 Millstone Rd, Westford, MA 01886, USA; vfi[email protected] (V.L.F.); [email protected] (C.J.L.) 3 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan; [email protected] (K.H.); [email protected] (H.N.) 4 Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 10617, Taiwan; [email protected] (K.A.); [email protected] (M.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 September 2017; Accepted: 8 January 2018; Published: 24 January 2018 Abstract: A key question in the formation of the relativistic jets in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) is the collimation process of their energetic plasma flow launched from the central supermassive black hole (SMBH). Recent observations of nearby low-luminosity radio galaxies exhibit a clear picture of parabolic collimation inside the Bondi accretion radius. On the other hand, little is known of the observational properties of jet collimation in more luminous quasars, where the accretion flow may be significantly different due to much higher accretion rates. In this paper, we present preliminary results of multi-frequency observations of the archetypal quasar 3C 273 with the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) at 1.4, 15, and 43 GHz, and Multi-Element Radio Linked Interferometer Network (MERLIN) at 1.6 GHz.
    [Show full text]
  • Clusters of Galaxies…
    Budapest University, MTA-Eötvös François Mernier …and the surprisesoftheir spectacularhotatmospheres Clusters ofgalaxies… K complex ) ⇤ Fe ) α [email protected] - Wallon Super - Wallon [email protected] Fe XXVI (Ly (/ Fe XXIV) L complex ) ) (incl. Ne) α α ) Fe ) ) α ) α α ) ) ) ) α ⇥ ) ) ) α α α α α α Si XIV (Ly Mg XII (Ly Ni XXVII / XXVIII Fe XXV (He S XVI (Ly O VIII (Ly Si XIII (He S XV (He Ca XIX (He Ca XX (Ly Fe XXV (He Cr XXIII (He Ar XVII (He Ar XVIII (Ly Mn XXIV (He Ca XIX / XX Yo u are h ere ! 1 km = 103 m Yo u are h ere ! (somewhere behind…) 107 m Yo u are h ere ! (and this is the Moon) 109 m ≃3.3 light seconds Yo u are h ere ! 1012 m ≃55.5 light minutes 1013 m 1014 m Yo u are h ere ! ≃4 light days 1013 m Yo u are h ere ! 1014 m 1017 m ≃10.6 light years 1021 m Yo u are h ere ! ≃106 000 light years 1 million ly Yo u are h ere ! The Local Group Andromeda (M31) 1 million ly Yo u are h ere ! The Local Group Triangulum (M33) 1 million ly Yo u are h ere ! The Local Group 10 millions ly The Virgo Supercluster Virgo cluster 10 millions ly The Virgo Supercluster M87 Virgo cluster 10 millions ly The Virgo Supercluster 2dFGRS Survey The large scale structure of the universe Abell 2199 (429 000 000 light years) Abell 2029 (1.1 billion light years) Abell 2029 (1.1 billion light years) Abell 1689 Abell 1689 (2.2 billion light years) Les amas de galaxies 53 Light emits at optical “colors”… …but also in infrared, radio, …and X-ray! Light emits at optical “colors”… …but also in infrared, radio, …and X-ray! Light emits at optical “colors”…
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2017 Year Book Www
    1 2016-2017 YEAR BOOK WWW. C A R N E G I E S C I E N C E . E D U Department of Embryology 3520 San Martin Dr. / Baltimore, MD 21218 410.246.3001 Geophysical Laboratory 5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. / Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8900 Department of Global Ecology 260 Panama St. / Stanford, CA 94305-4101 650.462.1047 The Carnegie Observatories 813 Santa Barbara St. / Pasadena, CA 91101-1292 626.577.1122 Las Campanas Observatory Casilla 601 / La Serena, Chile Department of Plant Biology 260 Panama St. / Stanford, CA 94305-4101 650.325.1521 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism 5241 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. / Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8820 Office of Administration 1530 P St., N.W. / Washington, DC 20005-1910 202.387.6400 2 0 1 6 - 2 0 1 7 Y E A R B O O K The President’s Report July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2017 C A R N E G I E I N S T I T U T I O N F O R S C I E N C E Former Presidents Daniel C. Gilman, 1902–1904 Robert S. Woodward, 1904–1920 John C. Merriam, 1921–1938 Vannevar Bush, 1939–1955 Caryl P. Haskins, 1956–1971 Philip H. Abelson, 1971–1978 James D. Ebert, 1978–1987 Edward E. David, Jr. (Acting President, 1987–1988) Maxine F. Singer, 1988–2002 Michael E. Gellert (Acting President, Jan.–April 2003) Richard A. Meserve, 2003–2014 Former Trustees Philip H. Abelson, 1978–2004 Patrick E.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary As Preparation for the Final Exam
    UUnnddeerrsstatannddiinngg ththee UUnniivveerrssee Summary Lecture Volker Beckmann Joint Center for Astrophysics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County & NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Astrophysics Science Division UMBC, December 12, 2006 OOvveerrvviieeww ● What did we learn? ● Dark night sky ● distances in the Universe ● Hubble relation ● Curved space ● Newton vs. Einstein : General Relativity ● metrics solving the EFE: Minkowski and Robertson-Walker metric ● Solving the Einstein Field Equation for an expanding/contracting Universe: the Friedmann equation Graphic: ESA / V. Beckmann OOvveerrvviieeww ● Friedmann equation ● Fluid equation ● Acceleration equation ● Equation of state ● Evolution in a single/multiple component Universe ● Cosmic microwave background ● Nucleosynthesis ● Inflation Graphic: ESA / V. Beckmann Graphic by Michael C. Wang (UCSD) The velocity- distance relation for galaxies found by Edwin Hubble. Graphic: Edwin Hubble (1929) Expansion in a steady state Universe Expansion in a non-steady-state Universe The effect of curvature The equivalent principle: You cannot distinguish whether you are in an accelerated system or in a gravitational field NNeewwtotonn vvss.. EEiinnssteteiinn Newton: - mass tells gravity how to exert a force, force tells mass how to accelerate (F = m a) Einstein: - mass-energy (E=mc²) tells space time how to curve, curved space-time tells mass-energy how to move (John Wheeler) The effect of curvature A glimpse at EinsteinThe effect’s field of equationcurvature Left side (describes the action
    [Show full text]
  • Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, 1940-1973
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf2p300278 No online items Inventory of the Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, 1940-1973 Processed by Ronald S. Brashear; machine-readable finding aid created by Gabriela A. Montoya Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection Inventory of the Ira Sprague 1 Bowen Papers, 1940-1973 Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection Inventory of the Ira Sprague Bowen Paper, 1940-1973 The Huntington Library San Marino, California Contact Information Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 Processed by: Ronald S. Brashear Encoded by: Gabriela A. Montoya © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, Date (inclusive): 1940-1973 Creator: Bowen, Ira Sprague Extent: Approximately 29,000 pieces in 88 boxes Repository: The Huntington Library San Marino, California 91108 Language: English. Provenance Placed on permanent deposit in the Huntington Library by the Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection. This was done in 1989 as part of a letter of agreement (dated November 5, 1987) between the Huntington and the Carnegie Observatories. The papers have yet to be officially accessioned. Cataloging of the papers was completed in 1989 prior to their transfer to the Huntington.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of New High-Precision Transit Light Curves of WASP-10 B: Starspot
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. wasp10 c ESO 2018 September 10, 2018 Analysis of new high-precision transit light curves of WASP-10 b: starspot occultations, small planetary radius, and high metallicity⋆ G. Maciejewski1,2, St. Raetz2, N.Nettelmann3, M. Seeliger2, Ch. Adam2, G. Nowak1, and R. Neuh¨auser2 1 Toru´nCentre for Astronomy, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Gagarina 11, PL–87100 Toru´n, Poland e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astrophysikalisches Institut und Universit¨ats-Sternwarte, Schillerg¨asschen 2–3, D–07745 Jena, Germany 3 Institut f¨ur Physik, Universit¨at Rostock, D–18051 Rostock, Germany Received ...; accepted ... ABSTRACT Context. The WASP-10 planetary system is intriguing because different values of radius have been reported for its transiting exoplanet. The host star exhibits activity in terms of photometric variability, which is caused by the rotational modulation of the spots. Moreover, a periodic modulation has been discovered in transit timing of WASP-10 b, which could be a sign of an additional body perturbing the orbital motion of the transiting planet. Aims. We attempt to refine the physical parameters of the system, in particular the planetary radius, which is crucial for studying the internal structure of the transiting planet. We also determine new mid-transit times to confirm or refute observed anomalies in transit timing. Methods. We acquired high-precision light curves for four transits of WASP-10 b in 2010. Assuming various limb-darkening laws, we generated best-fit models and redetermined parameters of the system. The prayer-bead method and Monte Carlo simulations were used to derive error estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hot Subdwarf-White Dwarf Super-Chandrasekhar Candidate
    A hot subdwarf–white dwarf super-Chandrasekhar candidate supernova Ia progenitor Ingrid Pelisoli1,2*, P. Neunteufel3, S. Geier1, T. Kupfer4,5, U. Heber6, A. Irrgang6, D. Schneider6, A. Bastian1, J. van Roestel7, V. Schaffenroth1, and B. N. Barlow8 1Institut fur¨ Physik und Astronomie, Universitat¨ Potsdam, Haus 28, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, D-14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany 2Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK 3Max Planck Institut fur¨ Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 1, 85748 Garching bei Munchen¨ 4Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 5Texas Tech University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Box 41051, 79409, Lubbock, TX, USA 6Dr. Karl Remeis-Observatory & ECAP, Astronomical Institute, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Sternwartstr. 7, 96049 Bamberg, Germany 7Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 8Department of Physics and Astronomy, High Point University, High Point, NC 27268, USA *[email protected] ABSTRACT Supernova Ia are bright explosive events that can be used to estimate cosmological distances, allowing us to study the expansion of the Universe. They are understood to result from a thermonuclear detonation in a white dwarf that formed from the exhausted core of a star more massive than the Sun. However, the possible progenitor channels leading to an explosion are a long-standing debate, limiting the precision and accuracy of supernova Ia as distance indicators. Here we present HD 265435, a binary system with an orbital period of less than a hundred minutes, consisting of a white dwarf and a hot subdwarf — a stripped core-helium burning star.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Multiverse: the String Landscape, the Cosmological Constant, and the Arrow of Time
    The State of the Multiverse: The String Landscape, the Cosmological Constant, and the Arrow of Time Raphael Bousso Center for Theoretical Physics University of California, Berkeley Stephen Hawking: 70th Birthday Conference Cambridge, 6 January 2011 RB & Polchinski, hep-th/0004134; RB, arXiv:1112.3341 The Cosmological Constant Problem The Landscape of String Theory Cosmology: Eternal inflation and the Multiverse The Observed Arrow of Time The Arrow of Time in Monovacuous Theories A Landscape with Two Vacua A Landscape with Four Vacua The String Landscape Magnitude of contributions to the vacuum energy graviton (a) (b) I Vacuum fluctuations: SUSY cutoff: ! 10−64; Planck scale cutoff: ! 1 I Effective potentials for scalars: Electroweak symmetry breaking lowers Λ by approximately (200 GeV)4 ≈ 10−67. The cosmological constant problem −121 I Each known contribution is much larger than 10 (the observational upper bound on jΛj known for decades) I Different contributions can cancel against each other or against ΛEinstein. I But why would they do so to a precision better than 10−121? Why is the vacuum energy so small? 6= 0 Why is the energy of the vacuum so small, and why is it comparable to the matter density in the present era? Recent observations Supernovae/CMB/ Large Scale Structure: Λ ≈ 0:4 × 10−121 Recent observations Supernovae/CMB/ Large Scale Structure: Λ ≈ 0:4 × 10−121 6= 0 Why is the energy of the vacuum so small, and why is it comparable to the matter density in the present era? The Cosmological Constant Problem The Landscape of String Theory Cosmology: Eternal inflation and the Multiverse The Observed Arrow of Time The Arrow of Time in Monovacuous Theories A Landscape with Two Vacua A Landscape with Four Vacua The String Landscape Many ways to make empty space Topology and combinatorics RB & Polchinski (2000) I A six-dimensional manifold contains hundreds of topological cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Star Maps: Where Are the Black Holes?
    BLACK HOLE FAQ’s 1. What is a black hole? A black hole is a region of space that has so much mass concentrated in it that there is no way for a nearby object to escape its gravitational pull. There are three kinds of black hole that we have strong evidence for: a. Stellar-mass black holes are the remaining cores of massive stars after they die in a supernova explosion. b. Mid-mass black hole in the centers of dense star clusters Credit : ESA, NASA, and F. Mirabel c. Supermassive black hole are found in the centers of many (and maybe all) galaxies. 2. Can a black hole appear anywhere? No, you need an amount of matter more than 3 times the mass of the Sun before it can collapse to create a black hole. 3. If a star dies, does it always turn into a black hole? No, smaller stars like our Sun end their lives as dense hot stars called white dwarfs. Much more massive stars end their lives in a supernova explosion. The remaining cores of only the most massive stars will form black holes. 4. Will black holes suck up all the matter in the universe? No. A black hole has a very small region around it from which you can't escape, called the “event horizon”. If you (or other matter) cross the horizon, you will be pulled in. But as long as you stay outside of the horizon, you can avoid getting pulled in if you are orbiting fast enough. 5. What happens when a spaceship you are riding in falls into a black hole? Your spaceship, along with you, would be squeezed and stretched until it was torn completely apart as it approached the center of the black hole.
    [Show full text]
  • On Asymptotically De Sitter Space: Entropy & Moduli Dynamics
    On Asymptotically de Sitter Space: Entropy & Moduli Dynamics To Appear... [1206.nnnn] Mahdi Torabian International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste String Phenomenology Workshop 2012 Isaac Newton Institute , CAMBRIDGE 1 Tuesday, June 26, 12 WMAP 7-year Cosmological Interpretation 3 TABLE 1 The state of Summarythe ofart the cosmological of Observational parameters of ΛCDM modela Cosmology b c Class Parameter WMAP 7-year ML WMAP+BAO+H0 ML WMAP 7-year Mean WMAP+BAO+H0 Mean 2 +0.056 Primary 100Ωbh 2.227 2.253 2.249−0.057 2.255 ± 0.054 2 Ωch 0.1116 0.1122 0.1120 ± 0.0056 0.1126 ± 0.0036 +0.030 ΩΛ 0.729 0.728 0.727−0.029 0.725 ± 0.016 ns 0.966 0.967 0.967 ± 0.014 0.968 ± 0.012 τ 0.085 0.085 0.088 ± 0.015 0.088 ± 0.014 2 d −9 −9 −9 −9 ∆R(k0) 2.42 × 10 2.42 × 10 (2.43 ± 0.11) × 10 (2.430 ± 0.091) × 10 +0.030 Derived σ8 0.809 0.810 0.811−0.031 0.816 ± 0.024 H0 70.3km/s/Mpc 70.4km/s/Mpc 70.4 ± 2.5km/s/Mpc 70.2 ± 1.4km/s/Mpc Ωb 0.0451 0.0455 0.0455 ± 0.0028 0.0458 ± 0.0016 Ωc 0.226 0.226 0.228 ± 0.027 0.229 ± 0.015 2 +0.0056 Ωmh 0.1338 0.1347 0.1345−0.0055 0.1352 ± 0.0036 e zreion 10.4 10.3 10.6 ± 1.210.6 ± 1.2 f t0 13.79 Gyr 13.76 Gyr 13.77 ± 0.13 Gyr 13.76 ± 0.11 Gyr a The parameters listed here are derived using the RECFAST 1.5 and version 4.1 of the WMAP[WMAP-7likelihood 1001.4538] code.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Andrew J. Wiles
    ISSN 0002-9920 (print) ISSN 1088-9477 (online) of the American Mathematical Society March 2017 Volume 64, Number 3 Women's History Month Ad Honorem Sir Andrew J. Wiles page 197 2018 Leroy P. Steele Prize: Call for Nominations page 195 Interview with New AMS President Kenneth A. Ribet page 229 New York Meeting page 291 Sir Andrew J. Wiles, 2016 Abel Laureate. “The definition of a good mathematical problem is the mathematics it generates rather Notices than the problem itself.” of the American Mathematical Society March 2017 FEATURES 197 239229 26239 Ad Honorem Sir Andrew J. Interview with New The Graduate Student Wiles AMS President Kenneth Section Interview with Abel Laureate Sir A. Ribet Interview with Ryan Haskett Andrew J. Wiles by Martin Raussen and by Alexander Diaz-Lopez Allyn Jackson Christian Skau WHAT IS...an Elliptic Curve? Andrew Wiles's Marvelous Proof by by Harris B. Daniels and Álvaro Henri Darmon Lozano-Robledo The Mathematical Works of Andrew Wiles by Christopher Skinner In this issue we honor Sir Andrew J. Wiles, prover of Fermat's Last Theorem, recipient of the 2016 Abel Prize, and star of the NOVA video The Proof. We've got the official interview, reprinted from the newsletter of our friends in the European Mathematical Society; "Andrew Wiles's Marvelous Proof" by Henri Darmon; and a collection of articles on "The Mathematical Works of Andrew Wiles" assembled by guest editor Christopher Skinner. We welcome the new AMS president, Ken Ribet (another star of The Proof). Marcelo Viana, Director of IMPA in Rio, describes "Math in Brazil" on the eve of the upcoming IMO and ICM.
    [Show full text]
  • Správa O Činnosti Organizácie SAV Za Rok 2017
    Astronomický ústav SAV Správa o činnosti organizácie SAV za rok 2017 Tatranská Lomnica január 2018 Obsah osnovy Správy o činnosti organizácie SAV za rok 2017 1. Základné údaje o organizácii 2. Vedecká činnosť 3. Doktorandské štúdium, iná pedagogická činnosť a budovanie ľudských zdrojov pre vedu a techniku 4. Medzinárodná vedecká spolupráca 5. Vedná politika 6. Spolupráca s VŠ a inými subjektmi v oblasti vedy a techniky 7. Spolupráca s aplikačnou a hospodárskou sférou 8. Aktivity pre Národnú radu SR, vládu SR, ústredné orgány štátnej správy SR a iné organizácie 9. Vedecko-organizačné a popularizačné aktivity 10. Činnosť knižnično-informačného pracoviska 11. Aktivity v orgánoch SAV 12. Hospodárenie organizácie 13. Nadácie a fondy pri organizácii SAV 14. Iné významné činnosti organizácie SAV 15. Vyznamenania, ocenenia a ceny udelené organizácii a pracovníkom organizácie SAV 16. Poskytovanie informácií v súlade so zákonom o slobodnom prístupe k informáciám 17. Problémy a podnety pre činnosť SAV PRÍLOHY A Zoznam zamestnancov a doktorandov organizácie k 31.12.2017 B Projekty riešené v organizácii C Publikačná činnosť organizácie D Údaje o pedagogickej činnosti organizácie E Medzinárodná mobilita organizácie F Vedecko-popularizačná činnosť pracovníkov organizácie SAV Správa o činnosti organizácie SAV 1. Základné údaje o organizácii 1.1. Kontaktné údaje Názov: Astronomický ústav SAV Riaditeľ: Mgr. Martin Vaňko, PhD. Zástupca riaditeľa: Mgr. Peter Gömöry, PhD. Vedecký tajomník: Mgr. Marián Jakubík, PhD. Predseda vedeckej rady: RNDr. Luboš Neslušan, CSc. Člen snemu SAV: Mgr. Marián Jakubík, PhD. Adresa: Astronomický ústav SAV, 059 60 Tatranská Lomnica http://www.ta3.sk Tel.: 052/7879111 Fax: 052/4467656 E-mail: [email protected] Názvy a adresy detašovaných pracovísk: Astronomický ústav - Oddelenie medziplanetárnej hmoty Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 04 Bratislava Vedúci detašovaných pracovísk: Astronomický ústav - Oddelenie medziplanetárnej hmoty prof.
    [Show full text]