Is backreaction in cosmology a relativistic effect? On the need for an extension of Newton’s theory to non-Euclidean topologies Quentin Vigneron1,2 1 Institute of Astronomy, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Grudziadzka 5, 87-100 Toru´n, Poland 2 Univ Lyon, Ens de Lyon, Univ Lyon1, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon UMR5574, F–69007, Lyon, France E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 22 September 2021 Abstract. Cosmological backreaction corresponds to the effect of inhomogeneities of structure on the global expansion of the Universe. The main question surrounding this phenomenon is whether or not it could explain the recent acceleration of the scale factor, also known as Dark Energy. One of the most important result on this subject is the Buchert-Ehlers theorem (Buchert & Ehlers, 1997) stating that backreaction is exactly zero when calculated using Newton’s theory of gravitation, which may not be the case in general relativity. It is generally said that this result implies that backreaction is a purely relativistic effect. We will show that this is not necessarily the case, in the sense that this implication does not apply to a universe which is still well described by Newton’s theory on small scales but has a non-Euclidean topology. The theorem should therefore be generalised to account for such a scenario. In a heuristic calculation where we define a theory which is locally Newtonian but defined on a non-Euclidean topology, we show that backreaction is non-zero, meaning that it arXiv:2109.10336v1 [gr-qc] 21 Sep 2021 might be non-relativistic and might depend on the topology of our Universe. However, this theory is yet to be justified from a non-relativistic limit of general relativity. 1. Introduction The cosmological principle asserts that there exists a scale above which the Universe can be considered as homogeneous and isotropic. The Standard Model of Cosmology then assumes that the inhomogeneities under this scale do not affect the dynamics of domains of size bigger than the homogeneity scale. This implies that the expansion of such domains is given by the (homogeneous) Friedmann-Lemaˆıtre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) solution of general relativity, and the Friedmann expansion laws. That is why the dynamics of structures, under the standard model, is solved as a deviation around an FLRW background expansion. However, this assumption is not a consequence of the Electric Penrose process: high-energy acceleration of ionized particles by non-rotating weakly charged black hole Arman Tursunov,∗ Bakhtinur Juraev, ZdenˇekStuchl´ık, and Martin Koloˇs Research Centre for Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Institute of Physics, Silesian University in Opava, Bezruˇcovon´am.13,CZ-74601 Opava, Czech Republic In many astrophysical scenarios the charge of the black hole is often neglected due to unrealistically large values of the charge required for the Reissner-Nordstr¨omspacetime metric. However, black holes may possess small electric charge due to various selective accretion mechanisms. In this paper we investigate the effect of a small hypothetical electric charge of a Schwarzschild black hole on the ionization of a freely falling neutral particle and subsequent escape of the ionized particle from the black hole. We show that the energy of ionized particle can grow ultra-high and discuss distinguishing signatures of particle acceleration by weakly charged black holes. We also discuss a possible application of the proposed mechanism as an alternative cosmic ray acceleration scenario. In particular we show that the Galactic centre supermassive black hole is capable to act as a PeVatron of protons. The presented mechanism can serve as a simple toy model of a non-rotating compact object acting as a particle accelerator with a potential astrophysical implementations related to the cosmic ray physics and beyond. I. WEAKLY CHARGED BLACK HOLE hole mass, spin and electric charge [5]. The later is usu- ally neglected in astrophysical scenarios justified, on the Recently, it has been pointed out that the ionization or one hand, by unrealistically large values of the charge re- decay of neutral particles in the vicinity of rotating Kerr quired for its visible effect on the spacetime metric and black hole immersed into external magnetic field can lead on the other hand by quick discharge of any charge ex- to the acceleration of ionized particles to ultra-high en- cess by an accretion of a plasma surrounding black hole. ergies, with the Lorentz γ-factors of particles that may Indeed, one can compare the gravitational radius of a exceeding 1012 near supermassive black holes in realis- black hole with the characteristic length of the charge tically plausible conditions [1, 2]. The formalism of the QG of the Reissner-Nordstr¨omblack hole, which gives 1 mentioned acceleration mechanism is based on the mag- the maximum charge of the black hole per solar mass netic Penrose process [3, 4] in its novel, ultra-efficient r Q2 G 2GM regime, in which the energy of ionized particle drives G 4 = 2 ; (1) away the rotational energy of the black hole through elec- c c 1=2 30 M tromagnetic interaction. It has been claimed that the ) QG = 2G M ≈ 10 Fr: (2) mechanism might be responsible for the production of M the highest-energy cosmic ray particles [1] with energy This value of the charge is unattainable in any known exceeding 1020eV when applied to realistic supermassive astrophysically relevant scenario. Moreover, a neutral- black hole candidates. The process, however, requires ization of such a hypothetical charge QG would require the rotation of the black hole and the presence of exter- an accretion of a net charge with the total mass of ac- nal magnetic field. creted charged particles of MQ = mp;eQG=e, where the In this paper we investigate whether the acceleration indices denote proton and electron, respectively, and e of ionized particles can be achieved in a more simpli- is an elementary charge. Luminosity of black hole sur- fied settings, namely, in the vicinity of a non-rotating rounded by plasma or accretion disk can be derived from arXiv:2109.10288v1 [gr-qc] 21 Sep 2021 Schwarzschild black hole with a radial test electric field. infalling matter as L = Mc_ 2, where M_ accretion rate By a test electric field we denote the field, whose energy- and is the fraction of the rest mass energy radiated momentum tensor can be neglected in the description of away. On the other hand, from the balance of gravita- the gravitational field of the black hole. This implies that tional force and radiation pressure in the vicinity of a the electric field influences on the dynamics of charged black hole one can derive the Eddington luminosity for particles only, being negligible for the geodesics of neu- fully ionized hydrogen plasma surrounding a black hole tral particles. Such a simplified setup is motivated by the in the form following reasons. 4πGMmpc 38 M First of all, the no-hair theorem of black hole physics LEdd = ≈ 1:26 × 10 erg=s: (3) states that the spacetime around black holes can be fully σT M described by at most three metric parameters { black 1 Hereafter in this section we use the esu-cgs system of units, in which the electrostatic unit of charge is given by 1 Fr ≡ 1 esu = ∗ [email protected] 1 cm3=2 g1=2 s−1. In SI system of units, 1 C = 3 × 109 Fr. Life, the universe and the hidden meaning of everything 1,3 2, Zhi-Wei Wang † and Samuel L. Braunstein ∗ 1College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, People’s Republic of China 2Computer Science, University of York, York YO10 5GH, United Kingdom 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4, Canada †[email protected] and ∗[email protected] It is hard to look at the universe and not wonder about the meaning, of, well, everything. A natural question is whether what we see is a sign of intelligent design. The antithesis of design would be a random universe or, assuming laws of physics, one whose fundamental physical parameters were randomly selected, but conditioned on life (ourselves) being here to observe it. In unpublished work, the British physicist Dennis Sciama argued that such a randomly selected universe would display a statistical signature. He concluded that a random universe would almost certainly have parameters only just allowing for the possibility of life. Here we consider whether this signature is definitive. We find that with plausible additional assumptions Sciama’s signature would appear to reverse: Were our universe random, it could give the false impression of being intelligently designed, with the fundamental constants appearing to be fine tuned to a strong probability for life to emerge and be maintained. Whatever might be eventually concluded about a uni- would be the same as us being located in one of the uni- versal definition for life, we can certainly agree that the verses within the multiverse where humans are possible. universe we inhabit has so far supported the emergence, Such ‘explanations’ are said to invoke the weak anthropic evolution and continued sustenance of human beings. principle,6 yet they explain nothing and fail to provide Despite our having grown collectively more powerful than any real resolution. Are they at least predictive? most known species, within the universe we are very frag- Dennis Sciama, considered to be one of the fathers of ile and maintain a precarious hold on existence. We modern cosmology, argued that were our universe ran- are carbon based, requiring a planetary body to live on, dom it would almost certainly have a low probability for which follows a comfortable and steady orbit around a life as we know it.8 single and not too energetic star.