DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1707.07134V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 22 Jul 2017 2 Radio-Selected AGN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Astronomy Astrophysics Review manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Active Galactic Nuclei: what’s in a name? P. Padovani · D. M. Alexander · R. J. Assef · B. De Marco · P. Giommi · R. C. Hickox · G. T. Richards · V. Smolciˇ c´ · E. Hatziminaoglou · V. Mainieri · M. Salvato Received: June 12, 2017 / Accepted: July 21, 2017 Abstract Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) are energetic as- sic differences between AGN, and primarily reflect varia- trophysical sources powered by accretion onto supermassive tions in a relatively small number of astrophysical parame- black holes in galaxies, and present unique observational ters as well the method by which each class of AGN is se- signatures that cover the full electromagnetic spectrum over lected. Taken together, observations in different electromag- more than twenty orders of magnitude in frequency. The netic bands as well as variations over time provide comple- rich phenomenology of AGN has resulted in a large number mentary windows on the physics of different sub-structures of different “flavours” in the literature that now comprise a in the AGN. In this review, we present an overview of AGN complex and confusing AGN “zoo”. It is increasingly clear multi-wavelength properties with the aim of painting their that these classifications are only partially related to intrin- “big picture” through observations in each electromagnetic band from radio to γ-rays as well as AGN variability. We P. Padovani · E. Hatziminaoglou · V. Mainieri address what we can learn from each observational method, European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, D-85748 the impact of selection effects, the physics behind the emis- Garching bei Munchen,¨ Germany sion at each wavelength, and the potential for future studies. E-mail: [email protected] To conclude we use these observations to piece together the D. M. Alexander basic architecture of AGN, discuss our current understand- Centre for Extragalactic Astronomy, Department of Physics, Durham University, UK ing of unification models, and highlight some open ques- tions that present opportunities for future observational and R. J. Assef Nucleo´ de Astronom´ıa de la Facultad de Ingenier´ıa, Universidad Diego theoretical progress. Portales, Santiago, Chile Keywords Galaxies: active · Quasars: supermassive black B. De Marco holes · Radio continuum: galaxies · Infrared: galaxies · Max Planck Institute for extraterrestrial Physics, Garching bei X-rays: galaxies · gamma-rays: galaxies Munchen,¨ Germany Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Center, PL-00-716 Warsaw, Poland (current address) P. Giommi Contents Italian Space Agency, ASI, via del Politecnico snc, 00133 Roma, Italy 1 The Active Galactic Nuclei zoo . 2 R. C. Hickox arXiv:1707.07134v1 [astro-ph.GA] 22 Jul 2017 2 Radio-selected AGN . 5 Department of Physics & Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, 2.1 Physical mechanism(s) and types of AGN selected in NH, USA the radio . 5 G. T. Richards 2.1.1 Radio galaxies . 5 Dept. of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA 2.1.2 Flat- and steep-spectrum sources . 6 M. Salvato 2.1.3 RL and RQ AGN . 6 Max Planck Institute for extraterrestrial Physics, Garching bei 2.1.4 Low- and high-excitation AGN . 6 Munchen,¨ Germany 2.1.5 Radio-selected AGN classes and unification . 7 2.1.6 Classification of radio-selected AGN . 8 V. Smolciˇ c´ 2.2 Selection effects: SF contribution to the total radio lu- Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Bi- minosity output . 8 jenickaˇ cesta 32, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2.3 Cosmic evolution of radio-selected AGN . 9 2 P. Padovani et al. 2.4 The future of AGN studies in the radio band . 9 1 The Active Galactic Nuclei zoo 3 Infrared-selected AGN . 10 3.1 Physical mechanism behind IR emission . 10 The discovery of quasars (Schmidt, 1963) opened up a whole 3.2 AGN in the MIR . 11 new branch of astronomy (e.g. D’Onofrio, Marziani, & Su- 3.2.1 Broad-band MIR AGN identification . 11 lentic, 2012; Kellermann, 2015, for historical details). Twenty 3.2.2 Comparison with general AGN identification years earlier Seyfert (1943) had reported the presence of at other wavelengths . 12 3.2.3 Contaminants . 12 broad and strong emission lines in the nuclei of six spiral 3.2.4 Dust-free AGN and hot dust poor quasars . 12 nebulae (including some by now “classical” AGN, like NGC 3.2.5 Eddington Ratios and BH Masses . 14 1068 and NGC 4151). However, his work remained largely 3.3 Red, reddened and high-redshift AGN . 14 ignored until Baade & Minkowski (1954) pointed out the 3.4 MIR spectroscopy . 15 similarities between the spectra of the galaxies studied by 3.5 The future of AGN studies in the IR band . 15 Seyfert and that of the galaxy they had associated with the 4 Optically-selected AGN . 16 Cygnus A radio source. 4.1 Physical mechanisms behind optical emission . 16 As implicit in the name, AGN are stronger emitters than 4.2 Photometric and spectroscopic identification . 16 the nuclei of “normal” galaxies. This “extra” component is 4.3 Selection effects . 17 unrelated to the nuclear fusion powering stars and is now 4.4 Information content . 18 universally accepted to be connected instead to the presence 4.5 L=LEdd and MBH ..................... 18 6 4.6 The evolution with redshift and the impact of future of an actively accreting central supermassive (& 10 M ) facilities . 19 black hole (SMBH). 5 X-ray-selected AGN . 19 AGN have many interesting properties. These include: 48 −1 5.1 Physical mechanism behind X-ray emission . 19 (1) very high luminosities (up to Lbol ≈ 10 erg s ), which 5.2 Selection of AGN in the X-ray band: identification chal- make them the most powerful non-explosive sources in the lenges . 20 Universe and therefore visible up to very high redshifts (cur- 5.3 Selection of AGN in the X-ray band: AGN types, M , BH rently z = 7:1: Mortlock et al., 2011); (2) small emitting re- L=LEdd, and cosmic evolution . 22 5.4 The future of AGN studies in the X-ray band . 23 gions in most bands, of the order of a milliparsec, as inferred 6 γ-ray-selected AGN . 24 from their rapid variability (e.g. Ulrich, Maraschi, & Urry, 6.1 γ-ray AGN, their SEDs, and physical mechanism(s) 1997), implying high energy densities; (3) strong evolution behind γ-ray emission . 24 of their luminosity functions (LFs; e.g. Merloni & Heinz, 6.2 γ-ray detectors . 25 2013); (4) detectable emission covering the whole electro- 6.3 The HE band . 25 magnetic spectrum (this review). 6.3.1 AGN in the HE γ-ray band . 26 The latter property means that AGN are being discov- 6.4 The VHE band . 26 ered in all spectral bands. Different methods are employed 6.4.1 AGN in the VHE γ-ray band . 27 in different bands to identify these sources but, most im- 6.5 Blazar population properties and contribution to the γ- ray extragalactic background . 27 portantly, the various wavelength regimes provide different 6.6 Blazars and selection biases in the γ-ray and other en- windows on AGN physics. Namely, the infrared (IR) band ergy bands . 27 is mostly sensitive to obscuring material and dust, the opti- 6.7 The future of AGN studies in the γ-ray band . 28 cal/ultraviolet(UV) band is related to emission from the ac- 7 Variability-selected AGN . 29 cretion disk, while the X-ray band traces the emission of a 7.1 An overview of AGN variability in the local Universe . 29 (putative) corona. γ-ray and (high flux density) radio sam- 7.1.1 X-ray variability . 29 ples, on the other hand, preferentially select AGN emitting 7.1.2 UV/optical variability . 30 strong non-thermal (jet [or associated lobe] related) radia- 7.1.3 What does variability tell us about the driving 1 physical mechanism? . 31 tion (see Fig. 1) . The surface densities of AGN also vary 7.2 AGN variability in extragalactic surveys . 32 strongly across the electromagnetic spectrum due to a com- 7.2.1 Selecting AGN by variability . 32 plex mix of physical processes, selection effects, and tech- 7.2.2 Selection effects . 32 nological limitations (as shown in Sect. 8). 7.2.3 Variability dependence on luminosity and red- The past years have seen a proliferation of AGN classes, shift . 32 which outsiders to the field (but insiders as well!) find mes- 7.3 The future of AGN variability studies . 33 merising. A (possibly incomplete) list is given in Tab. 1, 8 Summary . 34 8.1 Fitting together the components of an AGN . 35 1 The mm/sub–mm band is missing from this paper because it 8.2 Unification and the importance of timescales . 36 mostly probes molecular gas that resides in the AGN host galaxy. How- 8.3 The emerging technicolor picture . 37 ever, with the high resolution capabilities of the Atacama Large Mil- 8.4 The future and open questions . 38 limeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) we are starting to resolve the in- References . 40 nermost parts of AGN down to parsec scales (Sect. 8.4). Active Galactic Nuclei: what’s in a name? 3 Table 1 The AGN zoo: list of AGN classes. Class/Acronym Meaning Main properties/reference Quasar Quasi-stellar radio source (originally) Radio detection no longer required Sey1 Seyfert 1 FWHM & 1; 000 km s−1 Sey2 Seyfert 2 FWHM . 1; 000 km s−1 QSO Quasi-stellar object Quasar-like, non-radio source QSO2 Quasi-stellar object 2 High power Sey2 RQ AGN Radio-quiet AGN see ref. 1 RL AGN Radio-loud AGN see ref. 1 Jetted AGN with strong relativistic jets; see ref.
Recommended publications
  • The Global Jet Structure of the Archetypical Quasar 3C 273

    The Global Jet Structure of the Archetypical Quasar 3C 273

    galaxies Article The Global Jet Structure of the Archetypical Quasar 3C 273 Kazunori Akiyama 1,2,3,*, Keiichi Asada 4, Vincent L. Fish 2 ID , Masanori Nakamura 4, Kazuhiro Hada 3 ID , Hiroshi Nagai 3 and Colin J. Lonsdale 2 1 National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Haystack Observatory, 99 Millstone Rd, Westford, MA 01886, USA; vfi[email protected] (V.L.F.); [email protected] (C.J.L.) 3 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan; [email protected] (K.H.); [email protected] (H.N.) 4 Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 10617, Taiwan; [email protected] (K.A.); [email protected] (M.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 September 2017; Accepted: 8 January 2018; Published: 24 January 2018 Abstract: A key question in the formation of the relativistic jets in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) is the collimation process of their energetic plasma flow launched from the central supermassive black hole (SMBH). Recent observations of nearby low-luminosity radio galaxies exhibit a clear picture of parabolic collimation inside the Bondi accretion radius. On the other hand, little is known of the observational properties of jet collimation in more luminous quasars, where the accretion flow may be significantly different due to much higher accretion rates. In this paper, we present preliminary results of multi-frequency observations of the archetypal quasar 3C 273 with the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) at 1.4, 15, and 43 GHz, and Multi-Element Radio Linked Interferometer Network (MERLIN) at 1.6 GHz.
  • XIII Publications, Presentations

    XIII Publications, Presentations

    XIII Publications, Presentations 1. Refereed Publications E., Kawamura, A., Nguyen Luong, Q., Sanhueza, P., Kurono, Y.: 2015, The 2014 ALMA Long Baseline Campaign: First Results from Aasi, J., et al. including Fujimoto, M.-K., Hayama, K., Kawamura, High Angular Resolution Observations toward the HL Tau Region, S., Mori, T., Nishida, E., Nishizawa, A.: 2015, Characterization of ApJ, 808, L3. the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run, Classical Quantum ALMA Partnership, et al. including Asaki, Y., Hirota, A., Nakanishi, Gravity, 32, 115012. K., Espada, D., Kameno, S., Sawada, T., Takahashi, S., Ao, Y., Abbott, B. P., et al. including Flaminio, R., LIGO Scientific Hatsukade, B., Matsuda, Y., Iono, D., Kurono, Y.: 2015, The 2014 Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: 2016, Astrophysical Implications ALMA Long Baseline Campaign: Observations of the Strongly of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914, ApJ, 818, L22. Lensed Submillimeter Galaxy HATLAS J090311.6+003906 at z = Abbott, B. P., et al. including Flaminio, R., LIGO Scientific 3.042, ApJ, 808, L4. Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: 2016, Observation of ALMA Partnership, et al. including Asaki, Y., Hirota, A., Nakanishi, Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. K., Espada, D., Kameno, S., Sawada, T., Takahashi, S., Kurono, Lett., 116, 061102. Y., Tatematsu, K.: 2015, The 2014 ALMA Long Baseline Campaign: Abbott, B. P., et al. including Flaminio, R., LIGO Scientific Observations of Asteroid 3 Juno at 60 Kilometer Resolution, ApJ, Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: 2016, GW150914: Implications 808, L2. for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Binary Black Alonso-Herrero, A., et al. including Imanishi, M.: 2016, A mid-infrared Holes, Phys.
  • Galaxy Clusters in Radio → Non-Thermal Phenomena

    Galaxy Clusters in Radio → Non-Thermal Phenomena

    GalaxyGalaxy ClustersClusters inin radioradio ÎÎ NonNon--thermalthermal phenomenaphenomena Luigina Feretti Istituto di Radioastronomia CNR Bologna, Italy Tonanzintla, GH2005, 4-5 July 2005 Lecture 4 : Radio emission from cluster galaxies: Classical radio galaxies Radio – X-ray interaction Distorted structures: NAT and WAT Radio galaxies filling X-ray cavities Confinement : Trigger of radio emission: radio luminosity function Enhancement of star formation RadiogalaxiesRadiogalaxies X-ray:X-ray: ThermalThermal ggasas Radio:Radio: AA 119119 (z(z == 0.0441)0.0441) RadioRadio GalaxiesGalaxies PerseusPerseus X-rayX-ray ROSAROSATT PSPCPSPC HotHot gasgas NGC 1265 RadioRadio WSRTWSRT 4949 cmcm RadioRadio galaxiesgalaxies NGC 1275 IC310 RadioRadio galaxiesgalaxies ooff highhigh andand lowlow ppowerower havehave quitequite differentdifferent morphologiesmorphologies onon thethe largelarge scalescale (Fanaroff(Fanaroff && RileyRiley 11974)974) CygCyg AA FRFR IIII 24.24.55 -1-1 HighHigh popowewer:r: PP1.41.4 GHzGHz >> 1010 WW HzHz 3C3C 444499 24.524.5 -1-1 LowLow power:power: PP1.41.4 GHzGHz << 1010 WW HzHz FRFR II RADIORADIO GALAXIESGALAXIES ATAT INCREASINGINCREASING RADIORADIO POWERPOWER 1024 W Hz-1 at 1.4 GHz 3C 31 DA 240 4C 73.08 1026.5 W Hz-1 From Atlas of P.Leahy, powers computed With H0=75, q0=0.5 Owen and Ledlow 1994 TheThe radioradio emissionemission fromfrom INDIVIDUALINDIVIDUAL GALAXIESGALAXIES isis foufoundnd ttoo extendextend WELLWELL BEYONDBEYOND thethe physicalphysical sizesize ofof thethe hosthost opticaloptical galaxygalaxy (>(> oror
  • Ann Arbor AAPT 2009

    Ann Arbor AAPT 2009

    AnnAAPT 09 Asummerrbor meeting First Time at an AAPT Meeting? ...4 AAPT 2009 Meeting Information .....................6 Summer Meeting Bus Schedule/information ............8 Welcome to Ann Arbor ...............10 Special Events ...........................12 July 25–29 Awards/Plenaries ........................14 Committee Meetings ..................20 University of Michigan Exhibitor Information ..................21 Ann Arbor Commercial Workshops .............25 Meeting at a Glance ...................26 Session Finder ............................30 www.aapt.org Workshops .................................33 SESSION ABSTRACTS Sunday ..................................39 Monday .................................41 Tuesday .................................82 American Association of Physics Teachers Wednesday ..........................126 One Physics Ellipse College Park, MD 20740 Index of Contributors ...............144 301-209-3300, fax: 301-209-0845 Index of Advertisers .................146 [email protected], www.aapt.org Our Donors ...............................147 Map of Exhibit Hall ...................148 Welcome to Ann Arbor and the University of Michigan! This summer’s AAPT meeting offers about three dozen workshops and seven dozen sessions on a wide variety of topics; the apparatus, photo, and video contests; exhibits by numerous vendors of books and equipment; the traditional picnic and demo show; and the great book give-away. In addition (and of particular importance), 18 area committee meetings offer attendees an invaluable opportunity
  • Star Maps: Where Are the Black Holes?

    Star Maps: Where Are the Black Holes?

    BLACK HOLE FAQ’s 1. What is a black hole? A black hole is a region of space that has so much mass concentrated in it that there is no way for a nearby object to escape its gravitational pull. There are three kinds of black hole that we have strong evidence for: a. Stellar-mass black holes are the remaining cores of massive stars after they die in a supernova explosion. b. Mid-mass black hole in the centers of dense star clusters Credit : ESA, NASA, and F. Mirabel c. Supermassive black hole are found in the centers of many (and maybe all) galaxies. 2. Can a black hole appear anywhere? No, you need an amount of matter more than 3 times the mass of the Sun before it can collapse to create a black hole. 3. If a star dies, does it always turn into a black hole? No, smaller stars like our Sun end their lives as dense hot stars called white dwarfs. Much more massive stars end their lives in a supernova explosion. The remaining cores of only the most massive stars will form black holes. 4. Will black holes suck up all the matter in the universe? No. A black hole has a very small region around it from which you can't escape, called the “event horizon”. If you (or other matter) cross the horizon, you will be pulled in. But as long as you stay outside of the horizon, you can avoid getting pulled in if you are orbiting fast enough. 5. What happens when a spaceship you are riding in falls into a black hole? Your spaceship, along with you, would be squeezed and stretched until it was torn completely apart as it approached the center of the black hole.
  • RADIO ASTRONOMY OBERVTORY Quarterly Report CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

    RADIO ASTRONOMY OBERVTORY Quarterly Report CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

    1 ; NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY Charlottesville, Virginia t PROPERTY OF TH E U.S. G - iM RADIO ASTRONOMY OBERVTORY Quarterly Report CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA. 4 OCT 2 2em , July 1, 1984 - September 30, 1984 .. _._r_.__. _.. RESEARCH PROGRAMS 140-ft Telescope Hours Scheduled observing 1853.75 Scheduled maintenance and equipment changes 205.00 Scheduled tests and calibration 145.25 Time lost due to: equipment failure 122.00 power 3.25 weather 0.25 interference 14.50 The following continuum program was conducted during this quarter. No. Observer Program W193 N. White (European Space Observations at 6 cm of the eclipsing Agency) RS CVn system AR Lac. J. Culhane (Cambridge) J. Kuijpers (Utrecht) K. Mason (Cambridge) A. Smith (European Space Agency) The following line programs were conducted during this quarter. No. Observer Program B406 M. Bell (Herzberg) Observations at 13.9 GHz in search of H. Matthews (Herzberg) C6 H in TMC1. T. Sears (Brookhaven) B422 M. Bell (Herzberg) Observations at 3 cm to search for H. Matthews (Herzberg) C5 H in TMC1 and examination of T. Sears (Brookhaven) spectral features in IRC+10216 thought to be due to HC 9 N or C5 H. B423 M. Bell (Herzberg) Observations at 9895 MHz in an attempt H. Matthews (Herzberg) to detect C3 N in absorption against Cas A. 2 No. Observer Program B424 W. Batria Observations at 9.1 GHz of a newly discovered comet. C216 F. Clark (Kentucky) Observations at 6 cm and 18 cm of OH S. Miller (Kentucky) and H20 to study stellar winds and cloud dynamics.
  • Nustar Unveils a Heavily Obscured Low-Luminosity Active Galactic Nucleus in the Luminous Infrared Galaxy Ngc 6286 C

    Nustar Unveils a Heavily Obscured Low-Luminosity Active Galactic Nucleus in the Luminous Infrared Galaxy Ngc 6286 C

    Draft version October 26, 2015 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 04/17/13 NUSTAR UNVEILS A HEAVILY OBSCURED LOW-LUMINOSITY ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS IN THE LUMINOUS INFRARED GALAXY NGC 6286 C. Ricci1,2,*, et al. Draft version October 26, 2015 ABSTRACT We report on the detection of a heavily obscured Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) in the Lumi- nous Infrared Galaxy (LIRG) NGC 6286, obtained thanks to a 17.5 ks NuSTAR observation of the source, part of our ongoing NuSTAR campaign aimed at observing local U/LIRGs in different merger stages. NGC6286 is clearly detected above 10keV and, by including the quasi-simultaneous Swift/XRT and archival XMM-Newton and Chandra data, we find that the source is heavily obscured 24 −2 [N H ≃ (0.95 − 1.32) × 10 cm ], with a column density consistent with being mildly Compton- −2 thick [CT, log(N H/cm ) ≥ 24]. The AGN in NGC 6286 has a low absorption-corrected luminosity 41 −1 (L2−10 keV ∼ 3 − 20 × 10 ergs ) and contributes .1% to the energetics of the system. Because of its low-luminosity, previous observations carried out in the soft X-ray band (< 10 keV) and in the in- frared excluded the presence of a buried AGN. NGC 6286 has multi-wavelength characteristics typical of objects with the same infrared luminosity and in the same merger stage, which might imply that there is a significant population of obscured low-luminosity AGN in LIRGs that can only be detected by sensitive hard X-ray observations. 1. INTRODUCTION 2012; Schawinski et al.
  • The Third Catalog of Active Galactic Nuclei Detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope M

    The Third Catalog of Active Galactic Nuclei Detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope M

    The Astrophysical Journal, 810:14 (34pp), 2015 September 1 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/14 © 2015. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. THE THIRD CATALOG OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI DETECTED BY THE FERMI LARGE AREA TELESCOPE M. Ackermann1, M. Ajello2, W. B. Atwood3, L. Baldini4, J. Ballet5, G. Barbiellini6,7, D. Bastieri8,9, J. Becerra Gonzalez10,11, R. Bellazzini12, E. Bissaldi13, R. D. Blandford14, E. D. Bloom14, R. Bonino15,16, E. Bottacini14, T. J. Brandt10, J. Bregeon17, R. J. Britto18, P. Bruel19, R. Buehler1, S. Buson8,9, G. A. Caliandro14,20, R. A. Cameron14, M. Caragiulo13, P. A. Caraveo21, B. Carpenter10,22, J. M. Casandjian5, E. Cavazzuti23, C. Cecchi24,25, E. Charles14, A. Chekhtman26, C. C. Cheung27, J. Chiang14, G. Chiaro9, S. Ciprini23,24,28, R. Claus14, J. Cohen-Tanugi17, L. R. Cominsky29, J. Conrad30,31,32,70, S. Cutini23,24,28,R.D’Abrusco33,F.D’Ammando34,35, A. de Angelis36, R. Desiante6,37, S. W. Digel14, L. Di Venere38, P. S. Drell14, C. Favuzzi13,38, S. J. Fegan19, E. C. Ferrara10, J. Finke27, W. B. Focke14, A. Franckowiak14, L. Fuhrmann39, Y. Fukazawa40, A. K. Furniss14, P. Fusco13,38, F. Gargano13, D. Gasparrini23,24,28, N. Giglietto13,38, P. Giommi23, F. Giordano13,38, M. Giroletti34, T. Glanzman14, G. Godfrey14, I. A. Grenier5, J. E. Grove27, S. Guiriec10,2,71, J. W. Hewitt41,42, A. B. Hill14,43,68, D. Horan19, R. Itoh40, G. Jóhannesson44, A. S. Johnson14, W. N. Johnson27, J. Kataoka45,T.Kawano40, F. Krauss46, M. Kuss12, G. La Mura9,47, S. Larsson30,31,48, L.
  • Virgo the Virgin

    Virgo the Virgin

    Virgo the Virgin Virgo is one of the constellations of the zodiac, the group tion Virgo itself. There is also the connection here with of 12 constellations that lies on the ecliptic plane defined “The Scales of Justice” and the sign Libra which lies next by the planets orbital orientation around the Sun. Virgo is to Virgo in the Zodiac. The study of astronomy had a one of the original 48 constellations charted by Ptolemy. practical “time keeping” aspect in the cultures of ancient It is the largest constellation of the Zodiac and the sec- history and as the stars of Virgo appeared before sunrise ond - largest constellation after Hydra. Virgo is bordered by late in the northern summer, many cultures linked this the constellations of Bootes, Coma Berenices, Leo, Crater, asterism with crops, harvest and fecundity. Corvus, Hydra, Libra and Serpens Caput. The constella- tion of Virgo is highly populated with galaxies and there Virgo is usually depicted with angel - like wings, with an are several galaxy clusters located within its boundaries, ear of wheat in her left hand, marked by the bright star each of which is home to hundreds or even thousands of Spica, which is Latin for “ear of grain”, and a tall blade of galaxies. The accepted abbreviation when enumerating grass, or a palm frond, in her right hand. Spica will be objects within the constellation is Vir, the genitive form is important for us in navigating Virgo in the modern night Virginis and meteor showers that appear to originate from sky. Spica was most likely the star that helped the Greek Virgo are called Virginids.
  • The B3-VLA CSS Sample⋆

    The B3-VLA CSS Sample⋆

    A&A 528, A110 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015379 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics The B3-VLA CSS sample VIII. New optical identifications from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey The ultraviolet-optical spectral energy distribution of the young radio sources C. Fanti1,R.Fanti1, A. Zanichelli1, D. Dallacasa1,2, and C. Stanghellini1 1 Istituto di Radioastronomia – INAF, via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy Received 12 July 2010 / Accepted 22 December 2010 ABSTRACT Context. Compact steep-spectrum radio sources and giga-hertz peaked spectrum radio sources (CSS/GPS) are generally considered to be mostly young radio sources. In recent years we studied at many wavelengths a sample of these objects selected from the B3-VLA catalog: the B3-VLA CSS sample. Only ≈60% of the sources were optically identified. Aims. We aim to increase the number of optical identifications and study the properties of the host galaxies of young radio sources. Methods. We cross-correlated the CSS B3-VLA sample with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), DR7, and complemented the SDSS photometry with available GALEX (DR 4/5 and 6) and near-IR data from UKIRT and 2MASS. Results. We obtained new identifications and photometric redshifts for eight faint galaxies and for one quasar and two quasar candi- dates. Overall we have 27 galaxies with SDSS photometry in five bands, for which we derived the ultraviolet-optical spectral energy distribution (UV-O-SED). We extended our investigation to additional CSS/GPS selected from the literature.
  • '-. 5 36 B6 19650268

    '-. 5 36 B6 19650268

    -- '-. 5 36_B6 _ rr_nm O/ITEE I_ATUREOF THE QUASI-S_ OBJECTS F. HOYLE , University of Cambridge- C_m_ridge,Eng!and and G. R. BURBIDGE :University of California at San Diego La Jolla, California ) 19650268 1965026885-002 ON _ NA_NJEE OF THE QUASI-STELLAR OBJECTS F. HOYLE Uni,_ersity of Cambridge Cambridge, England and G. R. BURBIDGE University of California at San Diego - La Jolla, California Received July 1965 1985028885-003 ABST_ACT In this paper we discuss the origin of the quasi-stellar objects from , two different points of view: (i) that they are objects al;cosmological distances as has been commonly supposed, and (ii) that they are local obje:ts situated at distance _ 1 - l0 Mpc. In the introductory section the optical properties of the quasi-stellar objects ar_:compared with the optical properties of galaxies associated with strong radio courses and Syefert nuclei from both points of view. Section II is devoted to a d.Lscussion of (i) and on this basis it is argue_ that they are most probably the nuclei of galaxies which have reached a high density phase at which time the formation of me_sive objects and their subsequent evolution has occurred. Apart from the suggestion of Terrell little atr.entionhas been paid until now to the possibility that they are local objects and so we have considered this in considerable detail. A plausible case can now be made for supposing that they are coherent objects which have been ejected at relativistic speeds L from the nuclei of galaxies at times when they erupt to give rise to strong radio source_ and other phenomena.
  • Cfa in the News ~ Week Ending 3 January 2010

    Cfa in the News ~ Week Ending 3 January 2010

    Wolbach Library: CfA in the News ~ Week ending 3 January 2010 1. New social science research from G. Sonnert and co-researchers described, Science Letter, p40, Tuesday, January 5, 2010 2. 2009 in science and medicine, ROGER SCHLUETER, Belleville News Democrat (IL), Sunday, January 3, 2010 3. 'Science, celestial bodies have always inspired humankind', Staff Correspondent, Hindu (India), Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4. Why is Carpenter defending scientists?, The Morning Call, Morning Call (Allentown, PA), FIRST ed, pA25, Sunday, December 27, 2009 5. CORRECTIONS, OPINION BY RYAN FINLEY, ARIZONA DAILY STAR, Arizona Daily Star (AZ), FINAL ed, pA2, Saturday, December 19, 2009 6. We see a 'Super-Earth', TOM BEAL; TOM BEAL, ARIZONA DAILY STAR, Arizona Daily Star, (AZ), FINAL ed, pA1, Thursday, December 17, 2009 Record - 1 DIALOG(R) New social science research from G. Sonnert and co-researchers described, Science Letter, p40, Tuesday, January 5, 2010 TEXT: "In this paper we report on testing the 'rolen model' and 'opportunity-structure' hypotheses about the parents whom scientists mentioned as career influencers. According to the role-model hypothesis, the gender match between scientist and influencer is paramount (for example, women scientists would disproportionately often mention their mothers as career influencers)," scientists writing in the journal Social Studies of Science report (see also ). "According to the opportunity-structure hypothesis, the parent's educational level predicts his/her probability of being mentioned as a career influencer (that ism parents with higher educational levels would be more likely to be named). The examination of a sample of American scientists who had received prestigious postdoctoral fellowships resulted in rejecting the role-model hypothesis and corroborating the opportunity-structure hypothesis.