<<

DEVELOPING HOUSING IN RURAL COMMUNITIES: THE ROLE OF RURAL HOUSING ENABLERS

David Hedges, Cyngor Da

Walis George, Grŵp Cynefin Barriers and Challenges

 Affordability gap

 Evidence of local need

 Planning policies

 Land supply

 NIMBYs / NOTEs

 Funding

sustainability Enabling Factors

 Local authority land

 Delivery by Housing Associations

 Social Housing Grant

 Rural exception sites

 Rural Housing Enablers!!! Successful Delivery

Maes y Pandy,

Castell y Gog,

Successful Delivery

Godre’r Coed, Dinas

Gors Fach,

5

Successful Delivery

Maes y Priordy,

Trem y Garn, Morfa

Successful Delivery

Congl Meinciau,

Cysgod y Cwmwd,

7

Successful Delivery

Canolfan Fenter Congl Meinciau, Botwnnog

Pant yr Eithin, What is a Rural Housing Enabler?

Commonly acknowledged purpose: to work with rural communities to facilitate provision of housing that meets their needs.

Alongside this: a broker and bridge builder, bringing all those with a role in delivery together. It is at the earliest stages of providing affordable housing that RHEis seen as being most relevant: raising awareness, working with communities to identify needs and possible sites; increasing communities’ knowledge of the process; and dispelling myths.

As links between housing & community regeneration have become recognised, it appears RHEs purpose has expanded to assist the community find ways of improving its long-term sustainability. In such cases housing may be a consequence of the RHE’s involvement, but it may result in other community benefits.

Evaluation of RHEs in

Research consultancy team: Jo Lavis – Rural Housing Solutions David Hedges – Cyngor Da Cath Stubbings - Celandine Strategic Housing Lin Cousins – Three Dragons Research carried out 2013 - Published January 2014

Key Research Findings

 RHEs successfully put in place the evidence & community engagement - pre-requisites for delivery of rural affordable housing. Their Input is valued by LAs, HAs and communities.

 Since 2004 RHEs helped deliver 186 affordable homes in 6 areas, with 240 in the pipeline. 89% of completions in , Monmouthshire and South Powys - all areas where there has been a RHE in post since 2009.

Key Research Findings

 It is universally considered that the loss of an existing RHE project would reduce the already low levels of rural affordable housing delivery.

 It is perceived that delivery is held back by a lack of capital funding, limited site supply, out of date local plans, planning policies that do not take account of financial viability & a lack of strategic leadership. All issues which can be influenced by but are outside the direct control of RHEs.

Research Recommendations

 Adopt delivery team approach to rural affordable housing: HA, LA housing, planning policy and development management staff & RHE

 Greater RHE involvement in site appraisal including viability, supported by training & adoption of rural affordable housing viability toolkit.

 Greater RHE formal involvement in formal ‘training’ events for local authority politicians, organised through the WLGA.

Research Recommendations

 Extend Welsh Government funding for RHEs until March 2015, with similar commitment by local partners. During this time consider putting in place funding arrangements not wholly dependent on grant.  Post March 2015 - those Steering Groups showing commitment to rural affordable housing delivery should have opportunity to bid into funding pot available for RHE posts, with Welsh Government funding representing a maximum 33% of costs.

Research Recommendations

 In parallel, Welsh Government should work with Steering Groups, WLGA & CHC to develop alternative funding mechanisms - recognising links between delivery & revenue for RHE posts & include consideration of rurally targeted capital funding programme.

 Welsh Government should review with Steering Group Chairs and the Rural Housing Strategic Group (RHSG) the possibility of changing to a sub-regional approach extending across LA boundaries, but with more than one RHE covering the sub-region.

Research Recommendations

Steering Group arrangements

 Welsh Government should work with RHSG to set Terms of Reference for Steering Groups to include a strategic influencing role at local & national level. Signing up to these could be a condition of future funding for the RHE post.

 Steering Groups to agree roles & responsibilities for all those involved in rural affordable housing delivery, including RHEs, LAs and HAs.

Research Recommendations

Welsh Government

 Introduce targeted rural affordable housing capital programme - ideally over 3 years.

 Review of Acceptable Cost Guidance - applied to rural schemes.

 Permit cross-subsidy in small rural communities including on rural exception sites - especially in high value areas Research Recommendations

Welsh Government  Collect and publish data on delivery of affordable housing in rural communities & levels of ACG applied to rural schemes.  Agree with the RHSG core output & outcome targets - monitored by Steering Groups, included in LA monitoring returns to and collated by Welsh Government into a published annual report.  Explore with RHSG alternative practice being adopted across the UK particularly.

A Regional Approach?

 Delivery across a wider geography i.e. North West Wales

 Focus on delivery of affordable housing and community regeneration activity

 Strengthen partnership working and accountability

 Alternative funding model Collaboration - Present

Conwy Gwynedd Ynys Môn/ Anglesey Conwy CBC X X

IoACC X Funders SNPA X X

Grŵp Cynefin X X X North Wales Housing X Cartrefi Conwy X Welsh Government X X X

Accountable body / employer Grŵp Cynefin Grŵp Cynefin IoACC

Collaboration – In Future?

North West Wales

Conwy CBC X Gwynedd Council X

IoACC X Funders SNPA X Grŵp Cynefin X North Wales Housing X Cartrefi Conwy X Welsh Government X Accountable body / employer Grŵp Cynefin

No. of RHEs 3 Delivery

 Retain core RHE role across 3 Counties

 Research and develop alternative delivery models  Community Land Trusts  Revolving Land Bank  Low Cost Home Ownership models

 More than housing  Platform for community regeneration initiatives  Wider social, economic and environmental benefits Governance

 Service Board  LAs x 3, SNPA, HAs x 3  Rural regeneration?  Social enterprise?

 Agree Business Plan

 Secure new income streams

 Coordinate, support and scrutinise delivery: outcomes and outputs Funding

 Estimated budget 2015-18 £432K

 Local partners 60%

 Welsh Govt. 29% in year 1

 Fee income 11%+  Roof tax / development levy  Sell services into other LA areas?  Regeneration activity?  Alternative delivery models?

Implementation

 Support from local partners

 Awaiting Welsh Government response

 Establish Shadow Service Board  Statement of Intent  Business Plan  Budget for 2015-16

 Focus on delivery DIOLCH / THANK YOU [email protected] [email protected]