DOCSLIB.ORG

2005 Annual Return

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2005 Annual Return Annual Return Reporting on the year 2004/05 31 July 2005 Page 2 Contents Executive summary.....................................................................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................................................................................16 Network Rail’s regulatory targets....................................................................................................................................................................20 Key performance indicators................................................................................................................................................................................24 Section 1 – Operational performance .........................................................................................................................................................27 Introduction...................................................................................................................................................................................................27 Summarised network-wide data (delays to major operators) ........................................................................................28 National delay data by cause...............................................................................................................................................................30 Results for operating routes by delay category........................................................................................................................34 Further breakdown of performance data....................................................................................................................................43 Public Performance Measure (PPM)...............................................................................................................................................46 Section 2 – Asset failure .......................................................................................................................................................................................47 Infrastructure incidents recorded for attribution of delay..................................................................................................47 Network-wide totals................................................................................................................................................................................47 8 Operating Routes..................................................................................................................................................................................49 Section 3 – Asset quality ......................................................................................................................................................................................54 KPI 6 Network Rail Asset Stewardship Incentive Index (ASII)........................................................................................54 Number of broken rails (M1) .............................................................................................................................................................55 Rail defects (M2).........................................................................................................................................................................................57 Track geometry - national standard deviation data (M3)...................................................................................................60 Track geometry – poor track geometry (M3) ..........................................................................................................................62 Track geometry – speed band data (M3)....................................................................................................................................64 Track geometry – level 2 exceedences (M5)............................................................................................................................73 Condition of asset temporary speed restriction sites (M4)..............................................................................................75 Earthwork failures and derailments (M6).....................................................................................................................................78 Bridge condition (M8).............................................................................................................................................................................80 Signalling failures (M9).............................................................................................................................................................................83 Signalling asset condition (M10)........................................................................................................................................................85 Alternating current traction power incidents causing train delays (M11).................................................................88 Direct current traction power incidents causing train delays (M12) ...........................................................................90 Electrification condition – AC traction feeder stations and track sectioning points (M13)............................92 Electrification condition – DC traction substations (M14)................................................................................................94 Electrification condition – AC traction contact systems (M15)......................................................................................96 Electrification condition – DC traction contact systems (M16) .....................................................................................98 Station condition index (M17)........................................................................................................................................................100 Network Rail 2005 Annual Return Page 3 Station facility score (M18)................................................................................................................................................................103 Light maintenance depot – condition index (M19)............................................................................................................106 Section 4 – Activity volumes...........................................................................................................................................................................108 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................108 Track renewals: (M20) rail renewed (M21) sleepers renewed and (M22) ballast renewed......................109 Rail renewed (M20)...............................................................................................................................................................................110 Sleepers renewed (M21)....................................................................................................................................................................111 Ballast renewed (M22).........................................................................................................................................................................113 Switches and crossings renewed (M25)....................................................................................................................................115 Signalling renewed (M24)...................................................................................................................................................................116 Bridge renewals and remediation (M23)...................................................................................................................................117 Culverts renewals and remediation (M26)..............................................................................................................................118 Retaining walls remediation (M27)...............................................................................................................................................119 Earthwork remediation (M28) ........................................................................................................................................................120 Tunnel remediation (M29)................................................................................................................................................................121 Section 5 – Network capability .....................................................................................................................................................................122 Route classification .................................................................................................................................................................................123 Linespeed capability (C1)...................................................................................................................................................................124
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Operator's Story Appendix
    Railway and Transport Strategy Centre The Operator’s Story Appendix: London’s Story © World Bank / Imperial College London Property of the World Bank and the RTSC at Imperial College London Community of Metros CoMET The Operator’s Story: Notes from London Case Study Interviews February 2017 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide a permanent record for the researchers of what was said by people interviewed for ‘The Operator’s Story’ in London. These notes are based upon 14 meetings between 6th-9th October 2015, plus one further meeting in January 2016. This document will ultimately form an appendix to the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’ piece Although the findings have been arranged and structured by Imperial College London, they remain a collation of thoughts and statements from interviewees, and continue to be the opinions of those interviewed, rather than of Imperial College London. Prefacing the notes is a summary of Imperial College’s key findings based on comments made, which will be drawn out further in the final report for ‘The Operator’s Story’. Method This content is a collation in note form of views expressed in the interviews that were conducted for this study. Comments are not attributed to specific individuals, as agreed with the interviewees and TfL. However, in some cases it is noted that a comment was made by an individual external not employed by TfL (‘external commentator’), where it is appropriate to draw a distinction between views expressed by TfL themselves and those expressed about their organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Committee Inquiry Into Passenger Rail Franchising June 2006
    House of Commons Transport Select Committee Inquiry into Passenger Rail Franchising Submission from pteg pteg welcomes the opportunity to submit evidence to the House of Commons Select Committee Inquiry into Passenger Rail Franchising. This evidence is presented on behalf of the English Passenger Transport Executives: Nexus, Merseytravel, Greater Manchester PTE, Metro, South Yorkshire PTE & Centro. What should be the purpose of passenger rail franchising? Passenger rail franchising should be the mechanism by which the public sector can specify the standard and quality of passenger rail services it can afford. The process as a whole should secure for the public sector the best value for money rail service that meets both national and local objectives. The process should drive up quality in particular through:- Improved train service performance Improved quality of train services (in terms of both capacity and quality of passenger environment) Improved safety at stations and on trains Improved integration with other rail services and other modes Improved facilities on trains and at stations (including in the longer-term all facilities brought up but to be fully accessible) It provides an opportunity to import best practice and innovation particularly through allowing private sector operators to make reasonable returns, act commercially and be innovative in delivery mechanisms. The overall aim of passenger rail franchising should be to deliver consistent and improving standards across the network. Is the current system achieving that purpose? To a considerable extent but with caveats relating to specification and funding constraints. The franchising process has evolved significantly since the first franchises were developed by OPRAF. They, the SRA, and now the DfT, have had to balance the extent to which services are tightly specified with allowing Train Operating Companies sufficient incentives to exercise innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank
    Annual Report 2016 This page is intentionally left blank 2 This report is published in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2017 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.gov.uk/raib. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.gov.uk/raib DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Cover image credits: Top: image taken from RAIB report 05/2016: Derailment at Godmersham. Second from top: image taken from RAIB report 09/2016: Runaway and collision at Bryn station. Third from top: image taken from RAIB report 11/2016: Derailment of a freight train near Langworth (image courtesy of Network Rail). Fourth from top: image taken from RAIB report 04/2017: Collision between a train and a tractor at Hockham Road user worked crossing. This page is intentionally left blank 4 Preface This is the Rail Accident Investigation Branch’s (RAIB) Annual Report for the calendar year 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 15 15 July 2005 Contents
    RailwayThe Herald 15 July 2005 No.15 TheThe complimentarycomplimentary UKUK railway railway journaljournal forfor thethe railwayrailway enthusiastenthusiast In This Issue Silverlink launch Class 350 ‘Desiro’ New Track Machine for Network Rail Hull Trains names second ‘Pioneer’ plus Notable Workings and more! RailwayThe Herald Issue 15 15 July 2005 Contents Editor’s comment Newsdesk 3 Welcome to this weeks issue of All the latest news from around the UK network. Including launch of Class 350 Railway Herald. Despite the fact ‘Desiro’ EMUs on Silverlink, Hull Trains names second Class 222 unit and that the physical number of Ribblehead Viaduct memorial is refurbished. locomotives on the National Network continues to reduce, the variety of movements and operations Rolling Stock News 6 that occur each week is quite A brand new section of Railway Herald, dedicated to news and information on the astounding, as our Notable Workings UK Rolling Stock scene. Included this issue are details of Network Rail’s new column shows. Dynamic Track Stablizer, which is now being commissioned. The new look Herald continues to receive praise from readers across the globe - thank you! Please do feel free to pass the journal on to any friends or Notable Workings 7 colleagues who you think would be Areview of some of the more notable, newsworthy and rare workings from the past week interested. All of our back-issues are across the UK rail network. available from the website. We always enjoy hearing from readers on their opinions about the Charter Workings 11 journal as well as the magazine. The Part of our popular ‘Notable Workings’ section now has its own column! Charter aim with Railway Herald still Workings will be a regular part of Railway Herald, providing details of the charters remains to publish the journal which have worked during the period covered by this issue and the motive power.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Rail Crew Fatigue and Well-Being
    AN INVESTIGATION OF RAIL CREW FATIGUE AND WELL-BEING Jialin Fan A thesis submitted for the award of PhD, 2018 Word count: 57,263 SUMMARY Occupational fatigue is a severe problem in the rail industry, potentially jeopardising train crew health and train safety. The aim of this thesis was to investigate fatigue, its risk factors, and the associations between fatigue, well-being outcomes, and performance among staff members in the rail industry by conducting a series of studies. It also aimed to develop a usable online fatigue measure to examine fatigue in a real-life setting. A large-scale questionnaire survey was conducted to examine the prevalence of fatigue, identify the risk factors related to fatigue, and investigate the associations between fatigue and well-being outcomes among railway staff in general. An online experiment was then run to investigate the effects of time of day and workload on fatigue and the association between subjective fatigue and objective performance, with a student sample. Finally, a questionnaire exploring the potential risk factors and greater details for fatigue among railway staff was conducted, followed by a diary study investigating the effects of workload and other risk factors in the prediction of fatigue, and the impact of fatigue on objective performance in work life, with a railway staff sample. The results of this thesis suggested that job demands, especially mental workload and overtime work were the main predictors of different types of fatigue among train crew, although the risk factors for fatigue appeared to differ between job roles. Job demands, shift-work and other negative work characteristics were shown to increase fatigue, while positive work and individual characteristics were shown to play a buffering role against it.
    [Show full text]
  • Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Area Appraisal October 2020
    London Borough of Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Areas Appraisal October 2020 DOCUMENT CONTROL Author(s): Maria Medlycott, Teresa O’Connor, Katie Lee-Smith Derivation: Origination Date: 15/10/2020 Reviser(s): Tim Murphy Date of last revision: 23/11/2020 Date Printed: 23/11/2020 Version: 2 Status: Final 2 Contents 1 Acknowledgments and Copyright ................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 3 Explanation of Archaeological Priority Areas .................................................................. 8 4 Archaeological Priority Area Tiers ................................................................................ 10 5 History of Waltham Forest Borough ............................................................................. 13 6 Archaeological Priority Areas in Waltham Forest.......................................................... 31 6.1 Tier 1 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 31 6.2 Tier 2 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 31 6.3 Tier 3 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 32 6.4 Waltham Forest APA 1.1. Queen Elizabeth Hunting Lodge GV II* .................... 37 6.5 Waltham Forest APA 1.2: Water House ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bring the Country Together
    Annual Return 2008 Delivering for you Network Rail helps bring the country together. We own, operate and maintain Britain’s rail network, increasingly delivering improved standards of safety, reliability and efficiency. Our investment programme to enhance and modernise the network is the most ambitious it has ever been. Delivering a 21st century railway for our customers and society at large. Every day. Everywhere. Contents Executive summary 1 Switches and crossings renewed (M25) 117 Introduction 9 Signalling renewed (M24) 119 Targets 13 Bridge renewals and remediation (M23) 122 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 16 Culverts renewals and remediation (M26) 123 Retaining walls remediation (M27) 124 Section 1 – Operational performance and stakeholder Earthwork remediation (M28) 125 relationships 18 Tunnel remediation (M29) 126 Public Performance Measure (PPM) 19 Composite activity volumes measure 127 Summarised network-wide data (delays to major operators) 20 National data by delay category grouping 25 Section 5 – Safety and environment 129 Results for operating routes by delay category 31 Workforce safety 129 Asset failure 40 System Safety Infrastructure wrong side failures 131 Customer satisfaction – passenger and freight operators 46 Level crossing misuse 132 Supplier satisfaction 47 Signals Passed At Danger (SPADs) 133 Doing business with Network Rail 48 Operating irregularities 135 Joint Performance Process 48 Criminal damage 136 Route Utilisation Strategies (RUSs) 52 Environment 138 Regulatory enforcement 53 Safety and environment enhancements
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Tendering of Rail Services EUROPEAN CONFERENCE of MINISTERS of TRANSPORT (ECMT)
    Competitive EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT Tendering of Rail Competitive tendering Services provides a way to introduce Competitive competition to railways whilst preserving an integrated network of services. It has been used for freight Tendering railways in some countries but is particularly attractive for passenger networks when subsidised services make competition of Rail between trains serving the same routes difficult or impossible to organise. Services Governments promote competition in railways to Competitive Tendering reduce costs, not least to the tax payer, and to improve levels of service to customers. Concessions are also designed to bring much needed private capital into the rail industry. The success of competitive tendering in achieving these outcomes depends critically on the way risks are assigned between the government and private train operators. It also depends on the transparency and durability of the regulatory framework established to protect both the public interest and the interests of concession holders, and on the incentives created by franchise agreements. This report examines experience to date from around the world in competitively tendering rail services. It seeks to draw lessons for effective design of concessions and regulation from both of the successful and less successful cases examined. The work RailServices is based on detailed examinations by leading experts of the experience of passenger rail concessions in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands. It also
    [Show full text]
  • Class 150/2 Diesel Multiple Unit
    Class 150/2 Diesel Multiple Unit Contents How to install ................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Technical information ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Liveries .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Cab guide ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Keyboard controls ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Features .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Global System for Mobile Communication-Railway (GSM-R) ............................................................................. 18 Registering .......................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Deregistering - Method 1 ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Route Utilisation Strategy November 2008  Foreword
    Wales Route Utilisation Strategy November 2008 2 Foreword I am delighted to present Network Rail’s Route Principally this is in south Wales, where capacity Utilisation Strategy (RUS) for Wales. This use is at its highest. This is a result of a growth covers the entire rail network in Wales, as well in the number of trains serving Cardiff and the as some parts of the network in the English building of a number of new stations. On this border counties. part of the network, in the most populous part of the country, the RUS builds on the successful This network is extensive and diverse. past introduction of more services and the There are main line links from Wales into selective growth of the network. England, a long-distance line along the border connecting north and south Wales, a busy A major programme to renew signalling urban passenger network serving Cardiff, and equipment in the Newport and Cardiff areas branches traversing sparsely populated rural will take place in the next five to seven years, areas. Some parts of the network are subject and much of the work described in this to fluctuating demand according to the time of strategy to enhance the network is planned year, most notably on the Cambrian Coast and in conjunction with this signalling work to in the Conwy Valley. increase cost-effectiveness. The High Level Output Specification (HLOS), published in The context in which this RUS has been July 2007, contained a specific requirement to produced, as has often been the case with increase seating capacity into Cardiff during other RUSs, is one of growing demand for the morning peak.
    [Show full text]
  • London to Ipswich
    GREAT EASTERN MAIN LINE LONDON TO IPSWICH © Copyright RailSimulator.com 2012, all rights reserved Release Version 1.0 Train Simulator – GEML London Ipswich 1 ROUTE INFORMATIONINFORMATION................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................... 444 1.1 History ....................................................................................................................4 1.1.1 Liverpool Street Station ................................................................................................. 5 1.1.2 Electrification................................................................................................................ 5 1.1.3 Line Features ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Rolling Stock .............................................................................................................6 1.3 Franchise History .......................................................................................................6 2 CLASS 360 ‘DESIRO’ ELECTRIC MULTIPLE UNUNITITITIT................................................................................... ..................... 777 2.1 Class 360 .................................................................................................................7 2.2 Design & Specification ................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Journal JUN15
    Journal of the East Surrey Family History Society www.eastsurreyfhs.org.uk Volume 38 number 2 June 2015 ISSN 0141-7312 Regular and Society items An interview with Sylvia Dibbs 10 Can you help? 42 Chairman’s address from the AGM 4 Email addresses 15 ESFHS accounts for 2014 32 Group meetings 2 New ESFHS website 26 News from Surrey Heritage 27 Members’ articles Colourful characters of my childhood 8 England’s immigrants 1330-1550 21 John William Lillistone 38 London Fire Brigade museum 24 Researching relatives who served in WW1 16 Robert Fry of Streatham, and his ancestors 12 Unsung heroes of Surrey: Postman’s Park 36 The deadline for the September Journal is 10.00 a.m., 1st August All contributions should be sent to the Editor, whose contact details appear opposite East Surrey FHS Vol 38 No. 2 June 2015 1 Group meetings June 4 Surrey Gardens in Walworth 1831 – 1878 Stephen Humphrey Sutton Stephen is a Local and Family Historian in Southwark 8 Had you thought of looking at . ? Hilary Blanford Southwark A look at some unusual sources, and ideas to add some flesh to the bones of your ancestors 16 What did your ancestors leave behind? Croydon This is an open meeting: please bring anything relevant to your family history and share your memorabilia 24 Hearth Tax and other 17th century sources Francis Howcutt Lingfield July 2 My ancestors were Thames watermen Pat Hilbert Sutton Pat has been a family historian for over 20 years and is currently Chairman of the East Dorset group of the Somerset and Dorset FHS.
    [Show full text]