Getting on the Right Track

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Getting on the Right Track spotlight LEVERAGED FINANCE GETTING ON THE RIGHT TRACK JOANNA HAWKES OF ANGEL TRAINS EXPLAINS SOME OF THE ISSUES FACING THE ROLLING STOCK LESSOR IN THE FUNDING AND LEASING OF TRAINS TO THE OPERATING COMPANIES. he purpose of this article is to outline the issues facing the rolling stock lessor, both from the perspective of financing the purchase of rolling stock, as well as leasing it to the trains operating companies (Tocs). It focuses mainly on the Tactivities and experiences of Angel Trains (Angel). BACKGROUND. The three rolling stock leasing companies (Roscos) Angel, Porterbrook Leasing and HSBC Rail (formerly Eversholt tandem with extended and renegotiated franchises. As the market Leasing) were originally formed in 1994 out of the privatisation of has developed, lease contracts have become more bespoke and very British Rail. Their business is owning, maintaining and leasing rolling heavily negotiated. stock. At the time of public offer, fears of re-nationalisation under For a number of reasons – partly strategic, partly historic – Angel an incoming Labour government were high. Offers to buy from the Trains finances about 80% of its portfolio in the banking market, finance sector were limited and consequently two of the three were rather than via its parent. Figure 2 illustrates the current simplified the subject of management buy outs. Over subsequent years, industry structure. however, Roscos have migrated towards their natural home for UK leasing companies, and each has become a subsidiary of a big TYPES OF LEASES. There are a number of variations in the types of financial institution: Royal Bank of Scotland (Angel), Abbey National lease structures, but generally capital rentals are fixed. Tax and (Porterbrook) and HSBC (HSBC Rail). interest rate exposure generally reside with the lessor for the period Despite a low public profile, the Roscos are perceived to be one of the lease. of the success stories of privatisation. Leasing specialists have used All new lease terms require the implicit endorsement Strategic established techniques, specifically the application of surplus tax Rail Authority (SRA), effected through the SRA ‘Direct Agreement’. capacity and low funding costs, to create a product that didn’t exist The direct agreement determines the rights of the SRA to act in the in any prior form. Competition is acute among the three companies, event of a Toc default. These rights need to be acknowledged by the from which the Tocs benefit, and ancillary support services have lessor and other interested parties with security over the lease or been improved and maintained. More than 50% of the staff the trains. Under Section 30 of the Railways Act 1993 and the employed at Angel are engineers involved in train maintenance, Transport Act 2000 the SRA has a statutory duty to provide train safety and product development. Since privatisation Roscos have services consistent with the passenger service requirement (PSR). collectively financed the purchase of £3.5bn of new rolling stock, more than 60% by Angel (See Table 1). STANDARD MOLA LEASE. All of the former British Rail rolling stock assets are leased through the standard industry Maintenance and LEASING OF TRAINS AND CUSTOMER INTERFACE Operating Lease Agreement (Mola). Heavy maintenance responsibilities are directly with the lessor and maintenance GENERAL. Angel leases to 19 out of the 25 Tocs. Prior to expenditure is recovered through the ‘non-capital’ rent. privatisation a ‘standard’ lease structure was set up, which acted as For much of the older stock, the non-capital rent is higher than an industry benchmark. Most leases were established for a period of the capital rents. All older leases are subject to the Opraf/Rosco eight to ten years until March 2004 co-incident with most of the Agreement, a wider and more favourable predecessor to the current existing franchise end dates then established. New train purchases Direct Agreement, and 80% of capital rents are ‘underpinned’ by the have become the subject of new leases which have been running in Secretary of State for Transport. 58 THE TREASURER JANUARY 2002 spotlight LEVERAGED FINANCE NEW LEASES IN RELATION TO THE PURCHASE OF NEW ROLLING through a tripartite maintenance agreement with the manufacturer STOCK. The requirements for new rolling stock has arisen out of the and Toc. need for Tocs to meet their franchise commitments. Bespoke leases ▪ Lease linked to ‘novated’ purchases. There are a few instances have consequently been agreed with individual lessees. Broadly, they where a Toc has negotiated its own purchase contracts with train fall into several categories set out below: manufacturers in accordance with an original view to ‘own and operate’ but has found the use of capital and tax capacity can be ▪ Longer term dry leases. Long-term leases that exactly match the more effectively maintained through third-party leasing. In these franchise term. Angel has no maintenance responsibilities (but is cases, Angel negotiates with manufacturer and Toc to effect a heavily involved in the negotiations). It retains direct audit and novation of the purchase contract. inspection rights over the maintenance and a veto on any significant ▪ No leases and ‘speculative’ purchases. These are speculative changes to the maintenance arrangements. On expiry of the purchases made in exceptional cases where there is a considered and franchise Angel has the option to continue the maintenance regime justified risk that buying without a lease will enhance the ability to directly with the manufacturer and to step in, in the event of a Toc both market and price future leases. The most pertinent example of default. In practice, Angel keeps close control over maintenance this was the purchase by Angel of 25 prototype Siemens Desiro UK through its own project management. electrical multiple units specifically designed by Siemens to target ▪ Shorter term leases. In these cases, the Toc has not yet secured a the large UK mark 1 replacement market. For Angel this resulted in franchise extension, because it has not been awarded or even quick and substantial subsequent leases of 84 class 360 Desiros to tendered. These shorter term leases may be dry leases where the First Great Eastern (£75m) and 785 class 450/444 Desiros to South maintenance regime works as above, wet leases where the Angel West Trains (£640m). retains direct maintenance responsibility (even though it will often subcontract to the maintainer) or a ‘soggy’ lease, where it operates KEY FACTORS IN DETERMINING A RENTAL RATE. In general, lease rates are determined on a whole-life asset basis, typically assumed at TABLE 1 between 25 and 35 years. Assumptions are made on releasing and POST-PRIVATISATION ORDERS (1997-2001) refinancing risk over the full life. Newly negotiated leases generally relate to substantial levels of capital expenditure and will carry a Trains Lessor Producer Total Total specific risk for which a suitable return must be derived. Angel vehicles cost £m currently operates on a ‘deal by deal’ return criteria, with each contract having a bespoke financing arrangements. Typically, third 390 Virgin West Coast Angel Trains Alstom 477 593 party funders provide 80-90% of the debt with the balance funded Pendolinos directly by Angel. Issues such as construction interest, loan term, Class 67 loco EWS Angel Trains Alstom/GM 30 45 bullet can effect equity returns significantly. Financing terms are Class 66 loco EWS Angel Trains GM 250 320 critical to commercial decisions, which often results in some lengthy 333 Arriva Trains Northern Angel Trains Siemens 56 61 funding negotiations. Angel is continually re-evaluating its funding options and 450/444 Desiro – South Angel Trains Siemens 785 640 methodology in line with market changes to ensure optimal use of West Trains debt and capital. 360 Desiro – First Great Angel Trains Siemens 84 75 Eastern SPECIFIC TYPES OF DEAL RISKS 357 c2c Angel Trains Bombardier 112 92 175 First North Western Angel Trains Alstom 70 78 REFRANCHISING & RELEASING RISK. If a Toc has only a short 180 First Great Western Angel Trains Alstom 70 74 franchise, this exposes a lessor to short-dated repricing and releasing 332 Heathrow Express BAA Siemens 56 69 risk. This risk will be evaluated in the bid process and will address issues such as the likelihood of the existing franchisee securing a lease 220 Virgin Cross Country GL Railease Bombardier 352 407 (now Angel) extension (in which case, it may build conditional releasing into the deal), the SRA’s motivation towards new stock in evaluating new bids 168/0 Chiltern HSBC Rail Bombardier 9 7 (generally high), general train desirability, performance and 375 Connex South Eastern HSBC Rail Bombardier 240 180 transferability, and potential competition from vehicles that may be 170 ScotRail HSBC Rail Bombardier 18 17 cascaded from other routes by other lessors. 334 Scotrail HSBC Rail Alstom 120 100 Generally, when a new train has been successfully performing on an 220 Midland Mainline HSBC Rail Bombardier 96 115 existing route, the motivation of an incumbent to release is 375 New Southern Railways Porterbrook Bombardier 160 120 considered to be high. In addition, there are significant costs 168/0 Chiltern Porterbrook Bombardier 35 30 associated with changing trains, for example, driver training. 170 Anglia/Midland Porterbrook Bombardier 161 155 Mainline/Central REGULATORY AND POLITICAL RISK. There are a variety of regulatory and politically rated risks which we have to be aware of: 170 South West Trains Porterbrook Bombardier 16 15 357 c2c Porterbrook Bombardier 184 130 ▪ Direct Agreements. The form of the Direct Agreement has evolved 458/0 South West Trains Porterbrook Alstom 120 90 and the SRA is gradually seeking more flexibility over its step-in 460/0 Gatwick Porterbrook Alstom 64 45 rights – most specifically, the ability to ‘cherry pick’ from the assets leased under one contract, rather than operate on an ‘all or nothing’ Grand total ordered post-privatisation 3,565 3,458 basis, which presents more risk to the lessor.
Recommended publications
  • Transport Committee Inquiry Into Passenger Rail Franchising June 2006
    House of Commons Transport Select Committee Inquiry into Passenger Rail Franchising Submission from pteg pteg welcomes the opportunity to submit evidence to the House of Commons Select Committee Inquiry into Passenger Rail Franchising. This evidence is presented on behalf of the English Passenger Transport Executives: Nexus, Merseytravel, Greater Manchester PTE, Metro, South Yorkshire PTE & Centro. What should be the purpose of passenger rail franchising? Passenger rail franchising should be the mechanism by which the public sector can specify the standard and quality of passenger rail services it can afford. The process as a whole should secure for the public sector the best value for money rail service that meets both national and local objectives. The process should drive up quality in particular through:- Improved train service performance Improved quality of train services (in terms of both capacity and quality of passenger environment) Improved safety at stations and on trains Improved integration with other rail services and other modes Improved facilities on trains and at stations (including in the longer-term all facilities brought up but to be fully accessible) It provides an opportunity to import best practice and innovation particularly through allowing private sector operators to make reasonable returns, act commercially and be innovative in delivery mechanisms. The overall aim of passenger rail franchising should be to deliver consistent and improving standards across the network. Is the current system achieving that purpose? To a considerable extent but with caveats relating to specification and funding constraints. The franchising process has evolved significantly since the first franchises were developed by OPRAF. They, the SRA, and now the DfT, have had to balance the extent to which services are tightly specified with allowing Train Operating Companies sufficient incentives to exercise innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Class 465/466 Enhancement Pack Volume 1
    Class 465/466 Enhancement Pack Volume 1 Contents How to Install ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Liveries ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Keyboard Controls .................................................................................................................................. 8 Features ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Variations ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Driver Only Operation (DOO) ....................................................................................................... 12 Wheelslip Protection (WSP) .......................................................................................................... 13 Speed Set ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Accelerometer, Decelerometer & Clock ................................................................................... 14 Player Changeable Destination Display .................................................................................... 15 Automatic Unit Numbering ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London Connections OFF-PEAK RAIL SERVICES
    Hertford East St Margarets Interchange Station Aylesbury, Banbury Aylesbury Milton Keynes, Luton Bedford, Stevenage, Letchworth, Welwyn Stevenage Harlow, Bishops Stortford, and Birmingham Northampton, Cambridge, Kings Lynn, Hertford Stansted Airport Limited services (in line colours) Wellingborough, Garden City Ware Rugby, Coventry, Kettering, Leicester, Huntingdon, Peterborough North and Cambridge and The North East Rye Limited service station (in colours) Birmingham and Nottingham, Derby Hatfield Bayford The North West House Escalator link and Sheffield Broxbourne Welham Green Cuffley Airport link Chesham Watford Bricket St Albans ST ALBANS HIGH WYCOMBE Amersham North Wood Abbey Brookmans Park Crews Hill Enfield Town Cheshunt Docklands Light Railway Watford WATFORD Cockfosters Theobalds Tramlink Garston How Park Potters Bar Gordon Hill Wagn Epping Beaconsfield JUNCTION Wood Street Radlett Grove Bus link Hadley Wood Oakwood Enfield Chase Railway Chalfont & Latimer Watford Bush Theydon Bois Croxley Hill UNDERGROUND LINES Seer Green Croxley High Street Silverlink County New Barnet Waltham Cross Green Watford Elstree & Borehamwood Southgate Grange Park Park Debden West Turkey Bakerloo Line Chorleywood Enfield Lock Gerrards Cross Oakleigh Park Arnos Grove Winchmore Hill Street Loughton Central Line Bus Link Stanmore Edgware High Barnet Bushey Southbury Brimsdown Buckhurst Hill Circle Line Denham Golf Club Rickmansworth Mill Hill Broadway Bounds Chiltern Moor Park Carpenders Park Totteridge & Whetstone Chingford Canons Park Burnt New Green
    [Show full text]
  • South Western Franchise Agreement
    _____ September 2006 THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT and STAGECOACH SOUTH WESTERN TRAINS LIMITED SOUTH WESTERN FRANCHISE AGREEMENT incorporating by reference the National Rail Franchise Terms (Second Edition) CONTENTS CLAUSE PAGE 1. INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................. 4 2. COMMENCEMENT .......................................................................................................... 5 3. TERM 5 4. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS ................................................................................................ 6 5. SPECIFIC OBLIGATIONS ................................................................................................. 6 6. COMMITTED OBLIGATIONS ......................................................................................... 48 7. SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS ............................................................................................... 48 8. RECALIBRATION OF THE BENCHMARKS ...................................................................... 49 9. DOCUMENTS IN THE AGREED TERMS .......................................................................... 49 10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT ................................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX 1 ........................................................................................................................... 52 Secretary of State Risk Assumptions (Clause 5.1(y)) ................................................. 52 APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • NETWORK and VEHICLE CHANGE COMMITTEE
    NETWORK and VEHICLE CHANGE COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting No.26 held at Kings Cross on 2 September 2004 Present: Bryan Driver (Independent Vice-Chairman in the chair) Chris Hassall Peter Heubeck Nigel Oatway Andrew Pennington Geoff Sandberg Mike Scott Apologies: Steve Carter In attendance: Chris Blackman Martin Shrubsole 26/1 Minutes of meeting no.25 The minutes of meeting no.25, held at Kings Cross on 17 August 2004, were approved without modification. The Chairman signed a copy of the minutes as a true record of the proceedings. A copy of the approved minutes will be circulated to all Industry Parties. 26/2 Matters arising from the previous meeting There were no matters arising. 26/3 Hearing of Reference NV74 The Committee heard reference NV74 received from CrossCountry Trains on the subject of format of operational documentation. The Determination NV74 of the Committee is attached. 26/4 Update on references The Secretary reported that the position on outstanding references received was as follows: nv47/51 [see minute 18/5] North Western Trains and English Welsh & Scottish Railway have not yet confirmed the current position on these references (concerning the WCRM Major Project notice 2004); NV61 is deferred for further discussions between CrossCountry Trains and Network Rail; the Committee will meet to hear any elements that remain unresolved as at 30 September 2004; chrisb\tp1-19/nv74/mins0209 1 NV64 is deferred for further discussions between North Western Trains and Network Rail; the Committee will meet to hear any elements that remain
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Franchise: Invitation to Tender
    East Midlands Franchise Invitation to Tender 7 June 2018 1 The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.gov.uk/dft General email enquiries: [email protected] © Crown copyright 2018 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/2 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. 2 Contents Section 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Form of Contract
    [Show full text]
  • Kiepe Electric Gmbh Training Academy New Generation
    – THE – CUSTOMER JULY 2017 GROUP KNORR-BREMSE OF MAGAZINE RAIL SYSTEMS VEHICLE EDITION informer 45 NEWS Kiepe Electric GmbH Electrical traction systems added to portfolio CUSTOMERS + PARTNERS Training Academy Learning from the market leader PRODUCTS + SERVICES New generation VV-T 2.0 oil-free compressor 2 informer | edition 45 | july 2017 | contents editorial 16 New Siemens VELARO TR high-speed trains for Turkey 03 Dr. Peter Radina Member of the Executive Board, 18 Selectron train control systems for the Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Russian GOST market Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH 20 Knorr-Bremse’s involvement in the ”Shift2Rail” European technology initiative news 04 The latest information products + services 22 Running technology monitoring: Enhanced spotlight derailment detection for slab track applications 24 UIC approval for KKLII compact control valve 08 New Knorr-Bremse Development Center 26 Selectron wireless train control technology customers + partners 28 The next generation of oil-free compressors 30 Modern paint shop at IFE manufacturing site 10 Knorr-Bremse RailServices Training Academy in Brno 12 IFE Entrance Systems: Examples of installations for 32 System supplier and full friction range supplier: DB Regio AG, Moscow Metro and Citadis streetcars Optimal friction pairing with Knorr-Bremse 14 iCOM Monitor: The app platform for the rail industry 34 Enhanced door drives from Technologies Lanka E-MZ-0001-EN This publication may be subject to alteration without prior notice. A printed copy of this document may not be the latest revision. Please contact your local Knorr-Bremse representative or check our website www.knorr-bremse.com for the latest update. The figurative mark “K” and the trademarks KNORR and KNORR-BREMSE are registered in the name of Knorr-Bremse AG.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Recovery Renewing the Transport System
    Covid-19 Recovery Renewing the transport system July 2020 Covid-19 Recovery • Renewing the transport system 1 Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Impact of the crisis 7 Opportunity for renewal 15 Facilitating the shift to a rapid renewal 34 References 36 Acknowledgements This paper was developed by Campaign for Better Transport and is solely its view. Organisations were engaged directly and through four virtual roundtable discussions in May 2020, with senior representatives of train and bus operators, government representatives, local authorities, passenger bodies, technology companies and other stakeholders. Thanks go to the following organisations that were engaged or participated in discussions to inform the contents of this report, including: Abellio Group, Angel Trains, Arriva Group, Avis Budget Group, Bird, Bombardier, Bus Users UK, BVRLA, Cambridge and Peterborough Combined Authority, Client Earth, Community Rail, Community Transport Association, CoMoUK, Confederation of Passenger Transport, Essex County Council, Eversholt Rail, First Group, Five AI, Go-Ahead Group, Grand Central Railway, GTR, HCT Group, Liverpool City Region, Living Streets, Local Government Association, Network Rail, North East Combined Authority, Rail Delivery Group, Rail Freight Group, Rail Industry Association, RSSB, Ryse Hygrogen, South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive, Stagecoach Group, Sustrans, The AA, Trainline, Transdev, Transport & Environment, Transport Focus, Transport for Greater Manchester, Transport for London, Transport for the North, Transport for West Midlands, Uber, Urban Transport Group, ViaVan, Wrightbus, Zeelo. The paper has also been peer reviewed by the Campaign for Better Transport Policy Associates Network. Thank you to Isabel Dedring, Jim Steer, Keith Buchan, Kris Beuret, Leon Daniels, Lilli Matson, Lynda Addison, Matt Lovering, Phil Jones, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Tendering of Rail Services EUROPEAN CONFERENCE of MINISTERS of TRANSPORT (ECMT)
    Competitive EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT Tendering of Rail Competitive tendering Services provides a way to introduce Competitive competition to railways whilst preserving an integrated network of services. It has been used for freight Tendering railways in some countries but is particularly attractive for passenger networks when subsidised services make competition of Rail between trains serving the same routes difficult or impossible to organise. Services Governments promote competition in railways to Competitive Tendering reduce costs, not least to the tax payer, and to improve levels of service to customers. Concessions are also designed to bring much needed private capital into the rail industry. The success of competitive tendering in achieving these outcomes depends critically on the way risks are assigned between the government and private train operators. It also depends on the transparency and durability of the regulatory framework established to protect both the public interest and the interests of concession holders, and on the incentives created by franchise agreements. This report examines experience to date from around the world in competitively tendering rail services. It seeks to draw lessons for effective design of concessions and regulation from both of the successful and less successful cases examined. The work RailServices is based on detailed examinations by leading experts of the experience of passenger rail concessions in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands. It also
    [Show full text]
  • Class 150/2 Diesel Multiple Unit
    Class 150/2 Diesel Multiple Unit Contents How to install ................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Technical information ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Liveries .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Cab guide ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Keyboard controls ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Features .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Global System for Mobile Communication-Railway (GSM-R) ............................................................................. 18 Registering .......................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Deregistering - Method 1 ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London to Ipswich
    GREAT EASTERN MAIN LINE LONDON TO IPSWICH © Copyright RailSimulator.com 2012, all rights reserved Release Version 1.0 Train Simulator – GEML London Ipswich 1 ROUTE INFORMATIONINFORMATION................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................... 444 1.1 History ....................................................................................................................4 1.1.1 Liverpool Street Station ................................................................................................. 5 1.1.2 Electrification................................................................................................................ 5 1.1.3 Line Features ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Rolling Stock .............................................................................................................6 1.3 Franchise History .......................................................................................................6 2 CLASS 360 ‘DESIRO’ ELECTRIC MULTIPLE UNUNITITITIT................................................................................... ..................... 777 2.1 Class 360 .................................................................................................................7 2.2 Design & Specification ................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Marketplace Sponsorship Opportunities Information Pack 2017
    MarketPlace Sponsorship Opportunities Information Pack 2017 www.airmic.com/marketplace £ Sponsorship 950 plus VAT Annual Conference Website * 1 complimentary delegate pass for Monday www.airmic.com/marketplace only (worth £695)* A designated web page on the MarketPlace Advanced notification of the exhibition floor plan section of the website which will include your logo, contact details and opportunity to upload 20% discount off delegate places any PDF service information documents Advanced notification to book on-site meeting rooms Airmic Dinner Logo on conference banner Advanced notification to buy tickets for the Annual Dinner, 12th December 2017 Logo in conference brochure Access to pre-dinner hospitality tables Opportunity to receive venue branding opportunities Additional Opportunities * This discount is only valid for someone who have never attended an Airmic Conference Airmic can post updates/events for you on before Linked in/Twitter ERM Forum Opportunity to submit articles on technical subjects in Airmic News (subject to editor’s discretion) Opportunity to purchase a table stand at the ERM Forum Opportunity to promote MP content online via @ Airmic Twitter or the Airmic Linked In Group About Airmic Membership Airmic has a membership of about 1200 from about 480 companies. It represents the Insurance buyers for about 70% of the FTSE 100, as well as a very substantial representation in the mid-250 and other smaller companies. Membership continues to grow, and retention remains at 90%. Airmic members’ controls about £5 billion of annual insurance premium spend. A further £2 billion of premium spend is allocated to captive insurance companies within member organisations. Additionally, members are responsible for the payment of insurance claims from their business finances to the value of at least £2 billion per year.
    [Show full text]