THE VOWEL INVENTORY OF ROPER KRIOL Rikke Bundgaard-Nielsen Brett Baker MARCS Institute, University of Western Sydney/La Trobe University, University of Melbourne
[email protected],
[email protected] ABSTRACT monophthongs with an additional duration contrast, Despite being the largest Indigenous Australian and a number of diphthongs (at least /ei/, /ai/, /oi/, language, Kriol—an English-lexified creole spoken /ou/); not reported on here). We argue that Kriol has across the northern part of Australia—is still largely maintained a substrate-like five-vowel inventory, but unexamined from an instrumental or phonological also used a duration contrast as a means of doubling point of view. This hampers efforts to predict cross- the number of contrastive elements usually found in linguistic difficulties experienced by Kriol speakers Australian languages. We propose that the Kriol in English-language settings and crucially in vowel inventory developed into this 'five-vowel predicting the difficulties that Kriol-speaking system with a duration contrast' as a strategy to children face in learning Standard Australian maintain most of the quality contrasts in English. English. We report here on the vowel inventory of Kriol, which has previously been claimed to have 2. BACKGROUND between five and seven monophthongs and three or four diphthongs ([19],[20]). We show that its vowel The characteristic features of vowel systems of system is in fact a triangular five-vowel system, with Australian Indigenous languages are summarised in a duration contrast, and a number of diphthongs. [9]. Australian vowel systems tend to be small (3 This system thus reflects, in certain respects, typical qualities is typical), and the vowel space relatively inventories of the Indigenous substrate languages, restricted, compared to many other languages, except that, by radically increasing the number of including English.