DOCSLIB.ORG

Commission Meeting # 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commission Meeting # 6 COMMISSION MEETING # 6 December 13, 2019 Benton Building Baltimore, MD WELCOME & OVERVIEW Mike Kelly, Executive Director Baltimore Metropolitan Council 2 OPENING REMARKS 3 MEETING AGENDA ▪ October Meeting Minutes Review ▪ Introduction and Set Up ▪ Public Involvement Update ▪ Corridor Prioritization ▪ Network Improvements ▪ Strategic Actions ▪ Public Comment ▪ Next Steps 4 OCTOBER MEETING MINUTES REVIEW Kirby Fowler RTP Commission Chair 5 INTRODUCTION & SET UP Holly Arnold, Deputy Administrator Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Transit Administration 6 Plan Development 7 Today’s Focus ▪ Update on public involvement This meeting ▪ Discuss corridor prioritization and focuses on receive input on early, mid-term, corridor and long-term priority groupings prioritization and additional ▪ Discuss additional network network improvements and strategic improvements actions being proposed and strategic actions being proposed in the plan 8 RTP Plan Components Provide Faster, More Reliable Service ▪ No single component is more important than another. Grow Ridership ▪ Components are inter- connected; success in one Increase Access to Jobs and Opportunities is contingent upon success across the others. Enhance the Customer Experience Prepare for the Future 9 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Teddy Krolik, Chief of Engagement Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Transit Administration 10 Fall Open Houses October Locations: ▪ 10/21 Howard County Elkridge Library ▪ 10/22 Baltimore County Towson Library ▪ 10/24 Baltimore City Mondawmin Mall ▪ 10/28 Harford County Edgewood Rec. & Community Center ▪ 10/29 Anne Arundel County Severna Park Community Center 11 Input from Open Houses Public input echoed previous engagement themes: ▪ Improve local and regional connectivity ▪ Expand service, including service span and express options ▪ Improve paratransit services ▪ Concerns around safety and security ▪ General agreement about Regional Transit Corridors 12 Looking Ahead: Public Input on the Draft Plan ▪ Draft Plan presented at April 2020 Commission Meeting ▪ Public outreach throughout the jurisdictions and online between April and June (two to three events per jurisdiction) ▪ Public input presented at June 2020 Commission Meeting 13 CORRIDOR PRIORITIZATION Sandy Brennan RTP Project Staff 14 Legislative Requirements Legislation requires a plan that: A Transit Asset is vehicles, facilities, ▪ Defines the goals to be achieved through the equipment, fixed infrastructure. provision of public transit ▪ Identifies options for: Fixed Vehicles Facilities Equipment ▪ Improvements to existing transportation assets Infrastructure ▪ Leveraging non-Administration transportation options available to public transportation ▪ Corridors for new public transportation assets Buses Maintenance Right-of-way Facilities Service Vehicles (non- revenue) ▪ Prioritizes corridors for planning of new Track Ferries (guideway) public transportation assets Passenger Facilities ▪ Ensures consistency with local land use and Railcars Traction power Capital transportation plans Equipment Other Parking Communication passenger Facilities & Control vehicles FTA’s Transit Asset Categories and Classes 15 What is a corridor? ▪ Corridors represent key areas of focus for the next 25 years and together A Transit Asset is vehicles, facilities, provide a comprehensive view of equipment, fixed infrastructure. regional transit needs. Fixed ▪ These corridors have been identified as Vehicles Facilities Equipment Infrastructure having a need for assets because they: ✓ Demonstrate transit demand that justifies Buses Maintenance Right-of-way infrastructure, service, and/or technology Facilities Service Vehicles (non- revenue) improvements. Track Ferries (guideway) ✓ Have regional significance, often providing Passenger Facilities connectivity between jurisdictions. Railcars Traction power Capital Equipment Other Parking Communication passenger Facilities & Control vehicles FTA’s Transit Asset Categories and Classes 16 What is a corridor? Corridor identification and prioritization is the first step in the process. Corridors in this plan will NOT: ▪ Define specific routes, service patterns or alignments ▪ Develop specific levels of services ▪ Identify stations As the RTP is implemented across 25 years, feasibility studies, corridor stakeholders and the public will help identify the appropriate ▪ Identify mode levels of service, mode and stations. Corridors should remain flexible based on results of the feasibility study and must empower the community to be the key decision-makers on corridor service and assets. 17 Transit Priority Improvements for Corridors Transit Priority Improvements can help improve RIGHT- transit travel speeds and reliability of service. OF-WAY ❖ Interventions identified for each corridor were based on existing conditions and local INFRA- context. STRUCTURE & TECH ❖ Further refinement would be investigated during the corridor feasibility study phase, and final interventions would be selected STOP based on final mode and alignment INTERVEN- TIONS selection, cost-benefit analysis, and local jurisdiction support. *The Transit Priority Improvements identified in this FACILITIES presentation are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be an exhaustive list. 18 Transit Priority Improvements for Corridors Separated Bus Lane, WMATA RIGHT- OF-WAY Bus on Should Lane Markings, NJDOT TSP & Queue INFRA- Jumps STRUCTURE & TECH STOP INTERVEN- TIONS Level Boarding, GRTC FACILITIES Mobility Hub, Detroit DOT 19 20 Why are we prioritizing corridors? Components of Transit Readiness ▪ Categorizing each corridor by early-, mid-, or long- term opportunities, provides a roadmap for the region to identify assets Destinations Dense, Connected along the Path mixed 3 streets & and prepare corridors for 1 of Travel 2 land uses paths investment ▪ Required by the legislation Comfortable, Transit Programs inviting Priority on and 4 environment 5 the route’s 6 Incentives Street/ to promote Guideway transit 21 Corridor Prioritization: Measures In September, the commission identified 16 measures to help prioritize corridors. For each measure, a quantitative methodology was developed to objectively determine how the corridor performed. 22 Corridor Prioritization: Example ▪ Results were shared with Commissioners CORRIDOR 6 and other stakeholders in November ▪ Initial prioritization grouping was determined based on equal weighting of measures results ▪ Prioritization grouping was then modified based on feedback from stakeholders 23 Corridor Prioritization: Results Placed each corridor in one of three buckets: Early Opportunity Mid-Term Opportunity Long-Term Opportunity ✓ Strong existing market ✓ Strong to moderate existing ✓ Moderate existing market demand market demand demand ✓ Critical links in building the ✓ Need time to grow demand or ✓ Need time to grow demand or regional network prepare the corridor to support prepare the corridor to support infrastructure investments infrastructure investments ✓ Benefit the most people, jobs, and households in the region ❖ In the short term, jurisdictions ❖ In the short term, jurisdictions and/or the local transit provider and/or the local transit provider ❖ In the short term, jurisdictions should: should: and/or the local transit provider should: o Enhance existing service o Establish or enhance existing transit services o Start corridor studies o Implement incremental transit priority infrastructure o Implement incremental transit o Implement transit priority priority infrastructure infrastructure o Review landuse and zoning ordinances to be more transit o Review landuse and zoning o Enhance existing service supportive ordinances to be more transit o Increase pedestrian and bike supportive access to the corridors o Increase pedestrian and bike access to the corridors 24 Corridor Prioritization: Results Early Opportunity Mid-Term Opportunity Long-Term Opportunity Corridor Corridor Name Corridor Corridor Name Corridor Corridor Name # # # Morgan State Univ. to South Convention Center to Middle 1 5 3 Glen Burnie to Annapolis Baltimore River 2 Glen Burnie to South Baltimore 8 Towson to South Baltimore 4 Glen Burnie to Crofton 6 Towson to UM Transit Center 9 North Plaza to UM Transit Center 7 Towson to Hunt Valley White Marsh to Johns Hopkins Fallston to Aberdeen Proving 12 Mondawmin to South Baltimore 10 11 Hospital Ground 13 Rogers Avenue to City Hall 14 Mondawmin to Reisterstown 21 Laurel to Halethorpe 16 Ellicott City to Convention Center 15 Mondawmin to Northwest Hospital 26 Odenton to Clarksville West Baltimore to Hopkins 17 28 Annapolis to Union Station Bayview 22 Mondawmin to Hopkins Bayview Sparrows Point to Hopkins 18 23 Halethorpe to UM Transit Center 29 Bel Air to Edgewood Bayview 30 Ellicott City to BWI Airport 19 State Center to Hopkins Bayview 24 BWI Airport to Laurel BWI Airport to Columbia Town 25 20 Walbrook Junction to Berea Center 27 Ellicott City to Silver Spring 25 Corridor Prioritization: Results Early Opportunity Corridor Corridor Name # Morgan State Univ. to South 1 Baltimore 2 Glen Burnie to South Baltimore 6 Towson to UM Transit Center 12 Mondawmin to South Baltimore 13 Rogers Avenue to City Hall 16 Ellicott City to Convention Center West Baltimore to Hopkins 17 Bayview Sparrows Point to Hopkins 18 Bayview 19 State Center to Hopkins Bayview 20 Walbrook Junction to Berea 27 Ellicott City to Silver Spring 26 Corridor Prioritization: Results Mid-Term Opportunity Corridor Corridor Name # Convention Center to Middle 5 River 8 Towson to South
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Corridor Revitalization Phase 2 Report
    ROUTE 1 Introduction CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION STUDY Envisioning the Future PHASE 2 REPORT Improving Transportation July 12, 2002 Addressing Environmental Quality Fostering Community Well-Being PRESENTED BY Route 1 Corridor Task Force Howard County Department of Planning and Zoning Next Steps Table of Contents Introduction INTRODUCTION ...................................1 STUDY PURPOSE AND APPROACH ......................1 Study Phasing ................................1 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION .........................2 Citizen Workshops..............................2 PHASE 1 REPORT................................2 Promoting the Positive............................3 Transforming the Negative .........................3 Setting the Stage for Revitalization .....................3 Improving Transportation ..........................3 Enhancing Route 1 Appearance.......................3 Addressing the Needs of Youth .......................3 NORTH LAUREL CONCEPT PLAN .......................4 PHASE 2 REPORT ORGANIZATION ......................5 Envisioning the Future Phase 2 Report Topics ...........................5 ENVISIONING THE FUTURE.............................7 INTRODUCTION .................................7 CURRENT LAND USE PATTERN AND TRENDS ................7 Current Residential Land Use Patterns and Trends .............7 Current Commercial Land Use Patterns and Trends ............8 Current Industrial Land Use Patterns and Trends ..............8 LAND USE POLICIES ..............................9 Land Use Policy Goals ...........................9
    [Show full text]
  • The Patapsco Regional Greenway the Patapsco Regional Greenway
    THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While the Patapsco Regional Greenway Concept Plan and Implementation Matrix is largely a community effort, the following individuals should be recognized for their input and contribution. Mary Catherine Cochran, Patapsco Heritage Greenway Dan Hudson, Maryland Department of Natural Resources Rob Dyke, Maryland Park Service Joe Vogelpohl, Maryland Park Service Eric Crawford, Friends of Patapsco Valley State Park and Mid-Atlantic Off-Road Enthusiasts (MORE) Ed Dixon, MORE Chris Eatough, Howard County Office of Transportation Tim Schneid, Baltimore Gas & Electric Pat McDougall, Baltimore County Recreation & Parks Molly Gallant, Baltimore City Recreation & Parks Nokomis Ford, Carroll County Department of Planning The Patapsco Regional Greenway 2 THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................4 2 BENEFITS OF WALKING AND BICYCLING ...............14 3 EXISTING PLANS ...............................................18 4 TREATMENTS TOOLKIT .......................................22 5 GREENWAY MAPS .............................................26 6 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX .................................88 7 FUNDING SOURCES ...........................................148 8 CONCLUSION ....................................................152 APPENDICES ........................................................154 Appendix A: Community Feedback .......................................155 Appendix B: Survey
    [Show full text]
  • Camden Line • for Your Safety, Passengers Must Be on the Proper Platform Prior to the Train’S Arrival
    MARC PASSENGER CODE OF CONDUCT Camden Line • For your safety, passengers must be on the proper platform prior to the train’s arrival. Passengers MARC TRAIN who cross in front of, or behind the train while it is at the station will be denied boarding. Effective June 1, 2021 • Please do not stand in the aisles when seats are available. Standing is never permitted on stairs or in vestibules. Conductors will direct standing passengers to seats when available. C • Passengers must have tickets out for inspection or collection by any authorized MARC representative. CharmPass users must have the app open and ticket activated when Conductors enter the car to Baltimore to check tickets. When directed by the Conductor, customers must tap the screen on their mobile device Washington DC to demonstrate the security features of the app. If the customer’s device is not working—including a Weekday Peak Service dead battery—or the customer refuses to tap the screen, the ticket is considered invalid and the customer must purchase a ticket from the Conductor. Tickets may be inspected more than Camden Station once during a trip. *TRANSFER FREE: one-way fare valid for 90 minutes across Local Bus, Light RailLink and Metro • The conductor is in charge of the train. Follow his or her instructions while riding any MARC train. SubwayLink service. Only available with Charmpass and Charmcard. St. Denis Please inform the conductor of any service problems you may experience or if you need assistance prior to arriving at your destination. Dorsey DOWNTOWN BALTIMORE RAIL CONNECTIONS • Improper fare, improper conduct, intoxication, or offensive actions will not be tolerated.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Maryland Regional Transit Plan Commission Meeting Community College of Baltimore County (CCBC), Room 509 October 29, 2019 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM Meeting Notes
    Central Maryland Regional Transit Plan Commission Meeting Community College of Baltimore County (CCBC), Room 509 October 29, 2019 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM Meeting Notes Name Title Role Ramond Robinson Director of Transportation, Anne Anne Arundel County Arundel County Executive’s designee Theo Ngongang Deputy Director, Chief of Policy, Baltimore City Mayor’s Department of Transportation, designee Baltimore City Elisabeth Sachs Director of Government Reform & Baltimore County Strategic Initiatives, Baltimore Executive’s designee, County Ex Officio RTP Commission Chair Bradley Killian Director of Planning & Zoning, Harford County Harford County Executive’s designee Sameer Sidh Chief of Staff, Howard County Howard County Executive’s designee Jim Shea Chairman Emeritus, Venable LLP Senate President’s appointee Gina Stewart Executive Director, BWI Governor’s appointee Partnership J.C. Hendrickson Member, MDOT MTA MARC Governor’s appointee Riders Council Katie Collins-Ihrke Executive Director, Accessible Governor’s appointee Resources for Independence Note: Elisabeth Sachs served as Chair of the Commission in Kirby Fowler’s absence. OPENING Michael Kelly, Executive Director of the Baltimore Metropolitan Council, opened the fifth RTP Commission meeting. Mr. Kelly introduced John Olszewski, the Baltimore County Executive, who delivered introductory remarks. COUNTY EXECUTIVE’S WELCOME John Olszewski, County Executive for Baltimore County, welcomed the Commission to Baltimore County and commended MDOT MTA for creating a regional transit plan for the 6 St. Paul Street • Baltimore, MD 21202 • 443-317-9793 • rtp.mta.maryland.gov Page | 1 Central Maryland region. He noted that quality of life is one of Baltimore County’s number one concerns; mobility is a key factor impacting residents’ access to high quality jobs and time spent with their families.
    [Show full text]
  • Swanston St St Kilda Rd Fed Sq Works Brochure
    Tram service changes Alternative travel options We’re renewing tram tracks and overhead wires Route 1a, 58 and 67a trams between Stop 22 along Swanston Street, St Kilda Road and Southbank Toorak Rd/Dorcas St and Stop 7 RMIT University Boulevard. We’re also doing upgrade works for travelling along Kings Way, William Street and Stop 13 Flinders Street Station. La Trobe Street. Your journey may be affected during the works, so plan Trams along Bourke Street, Collins Street and Tram service ahead, consider alternative travel and allow extra time. Flinders Street to connect with diverting services. Sandringham, Cranbourne, Frankston, changes Route 1 trams run between South Melbourne Glen Waverley and Pakenham Line trains Beach and East Coburg diverting via Kings Way, 1 between the south eastern suburbs and City William Street and La Trobe Street between Loop stations. Stop 22 Dorcas St and Stop 7 RMIT University. Route 1 3 3a 5 6 16 Accessibility 64 67 72 Route 3 and 3a trams run a shortened service 3 between East Malvern and Stop 17 Grant St/ If you need assistance, speak to our customer 3a 2.30am Sunday June 27 to Police Memorial. service team or alert your driver. Accessible taxi services will be available at Route 5 trams run a shortened service between Stop 17 Grant St/Police Memorial: last tram Sunday July 11 5 Malvern and Stop 38 Orrong Rd, connecting with Route 64 trams to Grant Street. – 7am to 8pm on weekdays – 8am to 8pm on weekends Route 6 trams run in sections with no trams 6 between Stop 11 Collins St and Stop 17 Grant St/ Allow Police Memorial.
    [Show full text]
  • History of MDOT MTA and the Lots System
    History of Transit Organization in the Baltimore Region Transit Agencies and Service Development in the Baltimore Region OVERVIEW The Baltimore Regional Transit Governance and Funding Study will develop alternatives for how the region could structure, organize, and fund regional transit services. The approach to developing these alternatives includes working with the Baltimore Regional Transit Board (BRTB) through an iterative process of research, analysis, and stakeholder input to ensure that the alternatives are grounded in experience, respectful of history and constraints, but creative enough to recognize opportunities. This technical memo, the first in the series, focuses on the history and development of transit services in the Baltimore Region. The first step involves focusing on the history and development of transit Image from Creative Commons: ETLamborghini services in the Baltimore region to understand how the existing service network came to be and provides the context for why some regional services are operated by the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) and others by Locally Operated Transit Systems (LOTS). Our goal is that by understanding the historical perspective, we will understand the transit network, its origins and evolution and its current form. The overview and historical perspective include the development and evolution of: • State leadership for local transit services in the City of Baltimore. • State leadership for regional transit services, including the MARC commuter rail system and the Commuter Bus program. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | KFH Group | KPMG | Tamar Henkin 1 History of Transit Organization in the Baltimore Region • County leadership for local services in the counties surrounding Baltimore through the Locally Operated Transit System (LOTS) program.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 9/98 Rev. HISTORIC CONTEXT for TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS
    9/98 rev. HISTORIC CONTEXT FOR TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS IN PENNSYLVANIA Introduction To assist with establishing the significance of the historical background of bridge building in Pennsylvania, it is important to identify and understand the historic contexts associated with the resources. Bridges do not stand in isolation, historically or physically; they embody events and trends that need to be considered when evaluating their individual or collective historical significance. Historic contexts organize historic properties in terms of theme, place, and time, and only within a historic context can what is significant “be determined in relationship to the historic development from which it emerged and in relationship to a group of similar associated properties” (National Register Bulletin 16, 1986: 6-7). In order to evaluate the National Register eligibility of the pre-1956 bridge population in Pennsylvania historic contexts have been researched and prepared twofold: one on the history of transportation networks in Pennsylvania, and the second on the application of bridge technology within the state. Both contexts address transportation issues from the earliest days of settlement to the 1950s, and both set the bridges within the national, state, and local contexts. The historic contexts will provide a means of evaluating each bridge’s technological significance, and its relationship to Pennsylvania’s transportation systems. Based on the historic contexts and their application to National Register criteria, each bridge in the inventory will be evaluated on its own merits with the contexts identifying the crucial distinctions of significance to pools of similar resources. 1. Overview Bridges are best understood as integral parts of transportation networks that carry people, vehicles, and materials over natural barriers such as rivers and streams, and over manmade barriers such as railroads, canals, and roads.
    [Show full text]
  • RTP Konveio Document Comments Received Between April 23-June 18
    RTP Konveio Document Comments Received Between April 23-June 18 Orange cells indicate comments that received responses (first row in dark orange is the original comment, and rows beneath in lighter orange/italics are responses) Page (note: refers to Thumbs Thumbs Date posted Comment Konveio page number and not page number up down within doc) Add option to create more rail lines (subway/light rail) along heavy bus route usage and major destinations. Throwing more buses doesn't help 04/24/2020 - 1:20pm 26 4 0 when there is no capacity for them. Mass transit must transport a mass amount of people, or else it isn't mass transit. This plan does that (sort of) in the Regional Transit Corridors section starting on p. 58, but doesn't make it clear. People are reacting to this pink and white map like it is the Regional Transit Corridors map. They're not to blame for being confused. It might help to: 06/03/2020 - 6:12pm * put the Regional Transit Corridors section earlier in the document 26 1 0 * show the Early Opportunity Corridors on their own map * say more about the opportunity to build transit that moves more people faster (bus rapid transit, light rail, heavy rail) where this plan has identified are the places where improvements like that should be prioritized Look at the 1978 Metro Subway plan. Identify funding for long term and do 04/24/2020 - 1:22pm not rely on the state or federal government to continue funding. It's been 27 8 0 stripped for illogical reasons in the past! Establish a Transit Trust Fund through user fees or gasoline tax, or 05/06/2020 - 11:50pm 27 8 0 other means to solely dedicate to transportation projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Corridor Network Plan
    Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Priority Corridor Network Plan PRIORITY CORRIDOR NETWORK PLAN Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority PRIORITY CORRIDOR NETWORK PLAN Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority THE NEED FOR IMPROVED BUS SERVICES The Washington metropolitan area has Figure 1: Transit Modes Used Figure 2: Metrorail, Metrobus, and been growing steadily for the past 30 years Local Service Areas and is expected to continue to grow. Accord- ing to Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG) estimates, jobs are expected to increase by 31 percent between 2008 and 2030, and population is expected to grow 26 percent over the same period. How- ever, the region is not growing uniformly. The outer suburbs are expected to grow much faster than the regional core, with dramatic increases in population and employment. The regional core and inner suburbs will still have the highest concentrations of jobs in 2030, but the inner and outer suburbs will have the ma- jority of the population. per year, and is expected to continue to grow Between 2000 and 2008, travel time by Me- as population and employment increase. This trobus has increased due to growing conges- The growth in population and employment growth has led to challenges for the Metrobus and the pattern of growth both are contribut- tion. For example, Route 52 on Fourteenth service. Not only has demand been increas- Street in Washington DC experienced nearly ing to increased vehicle travel. More people ing, but the added traffic congestion stem- are traveling longer distances to reach their a 14 percent increase in travel time, Route ming from regional growth has been increas- 29K on Little River Turnpike/Duke Street in places of employment and other destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT MTA Property, Or Film Any MDOT MTA Property Or Station, Please Make Your Request Through the Office of Media Relations at 410-767-3936
    A MESSAGE FROM THE ADMINISTRATOR The Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Transit Administration (MDOT MTA) has made historic progress over the past year. With the launch of Governor Hogan’s BaltimoreLink plan to transform transit in the region, as well as a wide range of internal improvements to MDOT MTA processes and results, we are well along in our goal to become the number one transit agency in the nation. We recognize the important role that members of the media play in shaping perceptions about the MDOT MTA, and we take seriously our responsibility to you in responding quickly and accurately about all transit agency issues. To that end, we feature regular updates and behind-the-scenes stories about the MDOT MTA on a variety of traditional and online platforms that reach a wide variety of audiences and customers. These include regular appearances on local TV stations, our cable television show Commuter Connections, our 24/7 radio station WTTZ-FM 93.5, monthly columns in community newspapers and social media outlets. These supplemental sources of news, in addition to your direct connection to our public information officers, are intended to assist you in informing and substantiating your coverage of the MDOT MTA. I invite you to listen, like, follow or sign up for the MDOT MTA communications platforms that make sense for you, and to get in touch with us directly where we can be of assistance. In return, we’ll continue to do our best to keep you informed about all the ways MDOT MTA is working to provide safe, efficient, reliable transit across Maryland, with world-class customer service.
    [Show full text]
  • Cromwell Valley Park
    BALTIMORE BIRD CLUB PROGRAM 2014 - 2015 Updated March 2015 BALTIMORE BIRD CLUB a chapter of the MARYLAND ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. Cylburn Arboretum 4915 Greenspring Avenue Baltimore, MD 21209-4168 Website: http://www.baltimorebirdclub.org/ Facebook: www.facebook.com/groups/382565775136349/members/ OFFICERS PRESIDENT ..................................................................................... Joan Cwi 633 Stoney Spring Drive, Baltimore, MD 21210 .......................... 410 467-5352 ........................................................................................ [email protected] VICE PRESIDENT ............................................................................. Peter Lev 7 Devon Hill Rd., Unit A6, Baltimore MD 21210 ......................410 823-2962 ......................................................................................... [email protected] TREASURER ................................................................................. Dick Krejci 101 Daleview Court, Timonium, MD 21093................................... 410 252-7147 ............................................................................. [email protected] RECORDING SECRETARY ................................................ Mary Anne Fluke 4246 Darleigh Rd, Nottingham, MD 21236 ................................... 443 690-4319 .................................................................................... [email protected] MEMBERSHIP .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Governance and Funding Study Technical Memorandum #2 Existing Structure and Services
    Baltimore Regional Transit Governance and Funding Study Technical Memorandum #2 Existing Structure and Services February 2021 Existing Structure and Services Table of Contents Page Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Overview of Transit Governance / Current Structure in Baltimore Region ....................... 2 Regional Transit Services ............................................................................................. 12 Implications for developing Transit Governance and funding alternatives ..................... 24 Table of Figures Page Figure 1 CTP Development Process ......................................................................... 4 Figure 2 Overview of MDOT MTA ............................................................................. 7 Figure 3 Locally Operated Transit Systems (LOTS) Organizational Structures ....... 10 Figure 4 Baltimore Region Population Growth Rates (2010-2019) .......................... 13 Figure 5 Baltimore Region Median Household Income by County (2019) ............... 14 Figure 6 Baltimore Region Minority Population by County (2019) ........................... 15 Figure 7 Existing Transit Services – MDOT/MDOT MTA and Locally Operating Transit Systems (LOTS) ............................................... 17 Figure 8 MDOT MTA Transit Operating Funds (2019) ........................................... 18 Figure 9 MDOT MTA and LOTS Operating Funding by Source (2019) ................... 18 Figure
    [Show full text]