DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of Ramus Notch Depth in Different Skeletal Malocclusion B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of Ramus Notch Depth in Different Skeletal Malocclusion B Research Article Assessment of ramus notch depth in different skeletal malocclusion B. Priya, Saravana Pandian* ABSTRACT Introduction: Mandibles which demonstrate backward and downward rotation during growth have been found to experience apposition beneath the gonial angle together with excessive resorption under the symphysis. Subjects with deep antegonial and ramal notching were reported to have disturbed condylar growth and have shown that the mandibular growth potential is diminished in subjects with pronounced antegonial and ramal notching. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess ramus notch depth (RN) in relationship with skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 60 pretreatment digital lateral cephalometric radiographs having skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III pattern and aged between 14 and 35 years. Results: There were no significant differences in the ramal notch depth between skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III. Conclusions: The RN is not affected by sagittal jaws relationship. The increased RN may be one of the signs of the long face syndrome without open bite. Deep ramus notch is associated with the mandibular retrusion or backward position of the ramus. KEY WORDS: Class I, Class II, Class III lateral cephalogram, Ramus notch depth, Skeletal patterns INTRODUCTION alveolar border, wider behind than in front, is hollowed into cavities in the regions where the teeth are found; The lower jaw bone , known as the mandible is the these cavities are sixteen in number and vary in depth largest, strongest and the most inferior bone in the and size according to the teeth which they contain. To [1] human face. It forms the lower jaw and holds the the outer surface of the superior border, on either side, lower teeth in place. The mandible is placed beneath the buccinator is attached as far forward as the first the maxilla. The mandible is the only movable bone molar tooth. of the skull beside the ossicles of the middle ear. Mandible is the only movable bone in the facial The superior border is shorter than the inferior- skeleton. The left and right processes together fused superior and thicker in front than behind; a shallow to form bone, and the point where these sides join, the groove exists on the lower border of the ramus which mandibular symphysis, is still visible as a faint ridge houses the facial artery. in the midline.[2] Rami The mandible consists of body and two rami. The body The ramus of the human mandible has four sides, found at the front and a ramus on the left and the right; two surfaces, four borders, and two processes. The the rami rise up from the body and meet with the body ramus of the mandible consists of two surfaces at the angle of the mandible. (lateral and medial) and four borders (anterior, posterior, inferior, and superior). Lateral surface Body gives insertion of the masseter muscle, and medial The mandible resembled like a horseshoe and has two surface presents (a) mandibular foramen, (b) lingual, surfaces and two borders. Borders are, the superior or (c) mylohyoid grooves, and (d) insertion of medial pterygoid muscle. Anterior border of mandible Access this article online receives the insertion of the temporalis muscle. The posterior border of the ramus is related to the parotid Website: jprsolutions.info ISSN: 0975-7619 gland. Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India *Corresponding author: Saravana Pandian, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai – 600 077, Tamil Nadu, India. Phone: +91-9003101627. E-mail: [email protected] Received on: 17-08-2018; Revised on: 22-09-2018; Accepted on: 29-10-2018 480 Drug Invention Today | Vol 12 • Issue 3 • 2019 B. Priya and Saravana Pandian Borders connective tissues receiving local input control signals The lower border of the ramus is thick, straight, producing progressive compensatory changes in the [5] and continuous with the inferior border of the body shape and size of the ramus. of the bone. The anterior border of ramus is thinner The efficacy and timing of the treatment of superiorly while thicker inferiorly and is continuous malocclusions often depend on the pubertal growth with the oblique line. spurt.[6,7] Treatment effects may be impaired or The region where the lower border meets the posterior enhanced by variations in the direction, timing, and [8-10] border is the angle of the mandible, often called the duration of development in facial area; thus, gonial angle. extensive knowledge of facial morphology and development is necessary for the successful treatment The posterior border of the ramus is thick, smooth, of dentofacial deformities. Directional growth rounded, and covered by the parotid gland. The upper has assumed greater relevance with the increased border is thin and is surmounted by two processes, the realization that considerable individual variation coronoid in front and the condyloid behind, separated occurs in craniofacial growth and morphology.[11] by a deep concavity, the mandibular notch. Subjects with deep antegonial and ramal notching were reported to have disturbed condylar growth,[12-16] Processes Other studies[16,17] have shown that the mandibular The coronoid process is flattened from side to side growth potential is diminished in subjects with and varies in shape and size which is thin, triangular pronounced antegonial and ramal notching. eminence. The aim of this study was to investigate ramus notch The condyloid process is thicker than the coronoid depth (RN) in relation to the skeletal Class I, Class II, and consists of two portions: The condyle and the and Class III malocclusion. constricted portion which supports it, the neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS The lower borders meet the posterior border at the angle of the mandible, and the angle is incurved in The sample included 60 digital lateral cephalometric females but prominently everted in males. The males radiographs which were collected in the Orthodontic have squarer, stronger, and larger mandibles than Department at the Saveetha Dental College and Hospital females. The mental protuberance is more pronounced which are further elaborated in Table 1. The 60 subjects in males but can be visualized and palpated in females. included in the study comprised of 27 females and 30 males, their age ranged between 18 and 31 years. In orthodontics, skeletal growth is emphasized more The sample was divided according to the sagittal jaw than other aspects of craniofacial development, perhaps, relationship using ANB angle[18,19] into: Skeletal Class I because the methods for its study were developed (2° ≤ ANB ≤4°), Class II (ANB >4°), and Class III (ANB earlier. Knowledge of skeletal morphology and growth <2°). They were clinically healthy with no craniofacial is routinely applied in clinical practice; these can be syndromes or anomalies, such as a cleft lip and palate. visualized easily in the cephalogram. Craniofacial Subjects were excluded if they had a history facial skeletal growth is very important in orthodontics, since trauma or previous orthodontic, orthopedic, or surgical variations in craniofacial morphology are the source of treatment. All the cephalograms were taken with the most serious malocclusions, and induction of changes subject’s teeth in intercuspal position and traced by the in intermaxillary relationships is fundamental to same researcher [Figures 1-3]. The radiographs were orthodontic treatment.[3] Any alteration or adjustment analyzed using the FACAD software computer program of one part of the dentofacial complex will require a to calculate the linear measurement. After importing the like adjustment by another part of the complex for its picture to the FACAD program, points and planes were own accommodation and so on.[4] determined, and then, the linear measurements were obtained. Linear measurements, however, were divided The ramus of the mandible is the providing attachment by a scale for each picture to adjust for magnification. for masticatory muscles. However, the ramus is The scale was obtained depending on the measurement also integral to place the corpus and dental arch into from the ruler in the nasal rod. harmonious relationship with the maxilla and other [20] facial structures. Correct relationships are maintained by Cephalometric landmarks critical remodeling and adjustments in ramus alignment, The following cephalometric landmarks were used in vertical length, and anteroposterior dimensions. Indeed, this study [Figure 1]: the special developmental significance of the ramus is 1. Gonion (Go): A constructed point, the intersection integral to craniofacial growth. These alterations are of the lines tangent to the posterior margin of the induced by osteogenic, chondrogenic, and fibrogenic ascending ramus and the mandibular base. Drug Invention Today | Vol 12 • Issue 3 • 2019 481 B. Priya and Saravana Pandian Linear measurements[16] 1. RN:The distance along a perpendicular line from the deepest point of the RNC to a line connecting point Articulare with the point of greatest convexity on the posterior border of the angular process of the mandible.[17] 2. Ramus length: From Ar to Go 3. Mandibular body length: From go to me Statistical analysis The data were subjected to computerized statistical analysis using SPSS. The statistical analyses included descriptive statistics with mean values, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values for continuous measurements. Statistics include the Figure 1: Class I skeletal pattern ANOVA to compare the skeletal classes. The following levels of significance were used: • Non-significant - NS P > 0.05 • Significant - 0.05 ≥ P > 0.01 • Highly significant - 0.01 ≥ P > 0.001 • Very highly significant - P ≤ 0.001. ANOVA test was used to compare the mean values of the RN between the skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III. RESULTS The descriptive statistics for each skeletal class were presented from which we can distinguish that all were no-significantly difference in the RN in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Facial Skeletal Morphology: Nasal Bone, Maxilla, and Mandible
    Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2021, Article ID 5599949, 9 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5599949 Research Article Analysis of Facial Skeletal Morphology: Nasal Bone, Maxilla, and Mandible Han-Sheng Chen ,1 Szu-Yu Hsiao ,2,3 and Kun-Tsung Lee 4,5 1Dental Department, Kaohsiung Municipal Siao-gang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 2School of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 3Department of Dentistry for Child and Special Needs, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 4Division of Clinical Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 5Department of Oral Hygiene, College of Dental Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Correspondence should be addressed to Kun-Tsung Lee; [email protected] Received 12 February 2021; Revised 29 March 2021; Accepted 4 May 2021; Published 25 May 2021 Academic Editor: Michael YC Chen Copyright © 2021 Han-Sheng Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The growth and development of facial bones are closely related to each other. The present study investigated the differences in the nasomaxillary and mandibular morphology among different skeletal patterns. Cephalograms of 240 participants were divided into 3 groups based on the skeletal pattern (Class I, Class II, and Class III). The dimensions of nasomaxilla (nasal bone length, nasal ridge length, nasal depth, palatal length, and maxillary height) and mandible (condylar length, ramus length, body length, symphysis length, and entire mandibular length) were measured. One-way analysis of variance and Pearson’s correlation test were used for statistical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Variations in Mandibular Coronoid Process-A Morphometric Treatise
    Journal of Dental Specialities 2020;8(1):9–12 Content available at: https://www.ipinnovative.com/open-access-journals Journal of Dental Specialities Journal homepage: www.ipinnovative.com Original Research Article Variations in mandibular coronoid process-A morphometric treatise Sukhman Kahlon1, Gaurav Agnihotri1,* 1Dept. of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT Article history: Introduction: The Coronoid process is a triangular upward projection from antero-superior part of ramus Received 08-08-2020 of mandible giving attachment to two important muscles of mastication. Accepted 27-09-2020 Aims: The aim of our study was to observe the variations in shape and size of coronoid process and Available online 23-11-2020 establish the morphometric profile in Indian population. Materials and Methods: The material for this study comprised of 500 adult human mandibles. The shape of coronoid process was observed and its height and length were measured. Keywords: Results: Three variants of coronoid process were observed (round, triangular and hook) with incidence Mandible percentage 46, 42 and 12 respectively. The mean value of height and length of coronoid process came out Coronoid process to be 60.62 mm and 12.53 mm respectively. Rounded Conclusions: This morphometric treatise provides valuable inputs relevant for anthropological Triangular comparisons, forensic investigations and reconstructive procedures. Hook. © This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 1. Introduction 2. Materials and Methods Coronoid process in Greek means “like a crown”.
    [Show full text]
  • Facial Bones
    skull Facial bones There are 14 Facial bones: • 2 Maxillary bones • 2 zygomatic Bone • 2 Lacrimal bones • 2 Nasal bones • 2 Inferior nasal conchae • 2 palatine bones • 1 Vomer • 1 Mandible (lower jaw) 14 Total Maxillae Maxillae Frontal process Zygomatic process Body Alveolar process Palatine process Submentovertical view Palatine process of maxilla Caldwell view PA with angle Alveolar process of maxilla Lateral Alveolar process of maxilllae Palatine Bones Palatine Bones Zygomatic bone waters view Frontal process of zygomatic Body of zygoma Temporal process of zygomatic bone Lacrimal Nasal bone Nasion Inferior nasal conchae( turbinates) Inferior nasal conchae PA Inferior nasal conche Vomer Vomer Submentovertical view Vomer Vomer nasal septum Perpendicular plate of Ethmoid PA Caldwell view PA with angle nasal septum Mandible Mandibular notch Coronoid Process Condoyle(head) Neck Alveolar process Mentum Ramus Angle[gonion] Mentum Mandible TMJ Mandibular notch Coronoid Process Condoyle(head) Neck Alveolar process Condyle or head Mentum Ramus Alveolar neck Angle[gonion] process of angle body Ramus of mandible mandible Caldwell view PA with angle Alveolar process of mandible Ramus Angle[gonion] Submentovertical view Ramus Mandibular condyle (head) Sinuses Lateral frontal sinuse ethmoid sinuse Sphinoid sinuse Maxillary sinuse Review Lateral sinuses TMJ frontal ethmoid Sphinoid sinuse maxillary angle body Sinuses waters view Mastoid air cells Maxillary sinus Waters view facial bones Frontal process of zygomatic Frontal sinuses Ethmoid sinus Body
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of the Facial Nerve and Related Structures
    Rhoton Yoshioka Atlas of the Facial Nerve Unique Atlas Opens Window and Related Structures Into Facial Nerve Anatomy… Atlas of the Facial Nerve and Related Structures and Related Nerve Facial of the Atlas “His meticulous methods of anatomical dissection and microsurgical techniques helped transform the primitive specialty of neurosurgery into the magnificent surgical discipline that it is today.”— Nobutaka Yoshioka American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Albert L. Rhoton, Jr. Nobutaka Yoshioka, MD, PhD and Albert L. Rhoton, Jr., MD have created an anatomical atlas of astounding precision. An unparalleled teaching tool, this atlas opens a unique window into the anatomical intricacies of complex facial nerves and related structures. An internationally renowned author, educator, brain anatomist, and neurosurgeon, Dr. Rhoton is regarded by colleagues as one of the fathers of modern microscopic neurosurgery. Dr. Yoshioka, an esteemed craniofacial reconstructive surgeon in Japan, mastered this precise dissection technique while undertaking a fellowship at Dr. Rhoton’s microanatomy lab, writing in the preface that within such precision images lies potential for surgical innovation. Special Features • Exquisite color photographs, prepared from carefully dissected latex injected cadavers, reveal anatomy layer by layer with remarkable detail and clarity • An added highlight, 3-D versions of these extraordinary images, are available online in the Thieme MediaCenter • Major sections include intracranial region and skull, upper facial and midfacial region, and lower facial and posterolateral neck region Organized by region, each layered dissection elucidates specific nerves and structures with pinpoint accuracy, providing the clinician with in-depth anatomical insights. Precise clinical explanations accompany each photograph. In tandem, the images and text provide an excellent foundation for understanding the nerves and structures impacted by neurosurgical-related pathologies as well as other conditions and injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Osteometric and Radiological Study of the Mandibular Notch
    Int. J. Morphol., 37(2):491-497, 2019. Osteometric and Radiological Study of the Mandibular Notch Estudio Osteométrico y Radiológico de la Incisura Mandibular Ishwarkumar, S.1; Pillay, P.2; De Gama, B. Z.2 & Satyapal, K. S.2 ISHWARKUMAR, S.; PILLAY, P.; DE GAMA, B. Z. & SATYAPAL, K. S. Osteometric and radiological study of the mandibular notch. Int. J. Morphol., 37(2):491-497, 2019. SUMMARY: The mandibular notch is located on the superior margin, between two prominent processes of the mandibular ramus, the coronoid and condylar processes. The mandibular notch permits the entry of the masseteric artery, vein and nerve to the deep surface the masseteric muscle. Literary reports documented variations in both, the shape and size of the mandibular notch. Therefore, this study aimed to document the morphology and morphometry of the mandibular notch in the South African Black and Indian population groups and to determine their relationship to sex, age and race (if any). The morphometric and morphological parameters of the mandibular notch were measured and assessed in 149 digital panoramic radiographs and 51 dry mandible specimens (n=400) belonging to the South African Black African and Indian population groups. A combination of classification schemes by Mohammad et al. (2012) and Shakya et al. (2013) were adopted to assess the morphology of the mandibular notch. The morphometric parameter was measured using the Dicom x-ray viewer and a digital vernier caliper. Each of the morphometric and morphological parameters were statistically analyzed using SPSS, to determine if a relationship existed between the afore-mentioned parameters and sex, age and race.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Human Mandibular Shape During the Terminal Pleistocene
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Changes in human mandibular shape during the Terminal Pleistocene-Holocene Levant Received: 3 May 2018 Ariel Pokhojaev 1,2,3, Hadas Avni1,2, Tatiana Sella-Tunis1,2,3, Rachel Sarig2,3 & Hila May 1,2 Accepted: 4 June 2019 The transition to food production, exploitation of ‘secondary’ products (e.g., milk), and advances in Published: xx xx xxxx cookware technology have afected all aspects of human life. The aim of the present study was to follow changes in mandibular form and shape throughout the terminal Pleistocene-Holocene Levant. The hemimandibles of four populations were included in this study: Natufan hunter-gatherers (n = 10), Pre-pottery Neolithic early farmers (n = 6), Chalcolithic farmers (n = 9), Roman-Byzantine (n = 16), and modern (n = 63) populations. A surface mesh of each mandible was reconstructed from CT or surface scans. Changes in mandibular form and shape were studied using the Procrustes-based geometric morphometrics method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to examine diferences in size and shape between the studied populations. Our results reveal considerable temporal changes in mandibular shape throughout the Holocene Levant, mainly between the pre-agricultural population (the Natufan) and the succeeding ones, and between the post-industrial (the Modern) and the pre- industrial populations. A tendency for a reduction in mandibular size was identifed between the pre-agricultural population and the farmers. Most regions of the mandible underwent shape changes. In conclusion, substantial changes in mandibular shape occurred throughout the Holocene Levant, especially following the agricultural revolution. These changes can be explained by the “masticatory- functional hypothesis”.
    [Show full text]
  • Crista Galli (Part of Cribriform Plate of Ethmoid Bone)
    Alveolar margins alveolar margins coronal suture coronal suture coronoid process crista galli (part of cribriform plate of ethmoid bone) ethmoid bone ethmoid bone ethmoid bone external acoustic meatus external occipital crest external occipital protuberance external occipital protuberance frontal bone frontal bone frontal bone frontal sinus frontal squama of frontal bone frontonasal suture glabella incisive fossa inferior nasal concha inferior nuchal line inferior orbital fissure infraorbital foramen internal acoustic meatus lacrimal bone lacrimal bone lacrimal fossa lambdoid suture lambdoid suture lambdoid suture mandible mandible mandible mandibular angle mandibular condyle mandibular foramen mandibular notch mandibular ramus mastoid process of the temporal bone mastoid process of the temporal bone maxilla maxilla maxilla mental foramen mental foramen middle nasal concha of ethmoid bone nasal bone nasal bone nasal bone nasal bone occipital bone occipital bone occipital bone occipitomastoid suture occipitomastoid suture occipitomastoid suture occipital condyle optic canal optic canal palatine bone palatine process of maxilla parietal bone parietal bone parietal bone parietal bone perpendicular plate of ethmoid bone pterygoid process of sphenoid bone sagittal suture sella turcica of sphenoid bone Sphenoid bone (greater wing) spehnoid bone (greater wing) sphenoid bone (greater wing) sphenoid bone (greater wing) sphenoid sinus sphenoid sinus squamous suture squamous suture styloid process of temporal bone superior nuchal line superior orbital fissure supraorbital foramen (notch) supraorbital margin sutural bone temporal bone temporal bone temporal bone vomer bone vomer bone zygomatic bone zygomatic bone.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of a Pre-Clinical Mandibular Bone Notch Defect
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.1.20 ORIGINAL ARTICLE pISSN 2234-7550·eISSN 2234-5930 Investigation of a pre-clinical mandibular bone notch defect model in miniature pigs: clinical computed tomography, micro-computed tomography, and histological evaluation Patricia L. Carlisle1, Teja Guda1,2, David T. Silliman1, Wen Lien1, Robert G. Hale1, Pamela R. Brown Baer1 1Department of Craniomaxillofacial Regenerative Medicine, The United States Army Dental and Trauma Research Detachment, Fort Sam Houston, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA Abstract (J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;42:20-30) Objectives: To validate a critical-size mandibular bone defect model in miniature pigs. Materials and Methods: Bilateral notch defects were produced in the mandible of dentally mature miniature pigs. The right mandibular defect remained untreated while the left defect received an autograft. Bone healing was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) at 4 and 16 weeks, and by micro-CT and non-decalcified histology at 16 weeks. Results: In both the untreated and autograft treated groups, mineralized tissue volume was reduced significantly at 4 weeks post-surgery, but was comparable to the pre-surgery levels after 16 weeks. After 16 weeks, CT analysis indicated that significantly greater bone was regenerated in the auto- graft treated defect than in the untreated defect (P=0.013). Regardless of the treatment, the cortical bone was superior to the defect remodeled over 16 weeks to compensate for the notch defect. Conclusion: The presence of considerable bone healing in both treated and untreated groups suggests that this model is inadequate as a critical-size defect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Skull Morphology, Masticatory Muscle Force
    Annals of Anatomy 203 (2016) 59–68 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Annals of Anatomy jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aanat The relationship between skull morphology, masticatory muscle force ଝ and cranial skeletal deformation during biting a,b,c,∗ d a Viviana Toro-Ibacache , Víctor Zapata Munoz˜ , Paul O’Higgins a Department of Archaeology and Hull York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom b Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Chile, Sergio Livingstone Pohlhammer 943, Independencia, Región Metropolitana, Chile c Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Human Evolution, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany d Centro de Imagenología, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santos Dumont 999, Independencia, Región Metropolitana, Chile a r a t i c l e i n f o b s t r a c t Article history: The human skull is gracile when compared to many Middle Pleistocene hominins. It has been argued Received 28 November 2014 that it is less able to generate and withstand high masticatory forces, and that the morphology of the Received in revised form 27 February 2015 lower portion of the modern human face correlates most strongly with dietary characteristics. This study Accepted 1 March 2015 uses geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis (FEA) to assess the relationship between skull morphology, muscle force and cranial deformations arising from biting, which is relevant in under- Keywords: standing how skull morphology relates to mastication. The three-dimensional skull anatomies of 20 Modern humans individuals were reconstructed from medical computed tomograms. Maximal contractile muscle forces Skull morphology were estimated from muscular anatomical cross-sectional areas (CSAs).
    [Show full text]
  • The Skull and Vertebral Column
    The Skeletal System Skull, Vertebral Column and Girdles Pages 27 - 29 Cranium Skull Facial bones Clavicle Thoracic cage Scapula (ribs and Sternum sternum) Rib Humerus Vertebra Vertebral Radius column Ulna Sacrum Carpals Phalanges Metacarpals Femur Patella Tibia Fibula Tarsals Metatarsals (a) Anterior view Phalanges Figure 7.1a Functions of the Skull Support Movement Protection The Skull 22 bones, 2 groups 1. Cranial bones (8) Enclose the brain in the cranial cavity Provide sites of attachment for head and neck muscles Provide support The Skull 2. Facial bones (14 bones) Framework of face Cavities for special sense organs of sight, taste, and smell Openings for air and food passage Sites of attachment for teeth and muscles of facial expression Bones of cranium (cranial vault) Coronal suture Squamous suture Lambdoid Facial suture bones (a) Cranial and facial divisions of the skull Figure 7.2a Frontal bone Parietal bone Nasal bone Sphenoid bone Temporal bone Ethmoid bone Lacrimal bone Middle nasal Zygomatic bone concha Ethmoid Perpendicular bone Maxilla plate Mandible Vomer Mental foramen (a) Anterior view Figure 7.4a Coronal suture Frontal bone Sphenoid bone Parietal bone (greater wing) Ethmoid bone Temporal bone Lacrimal bone Lambdoid suture Squamous suture Nasal bone Occipital bone Zygomatic Zygomatic bone process Occipitomastoid Maxilla suture External acoustic meatus Mastoid process Alveolar Styloid process margins Mandibular condyle Mandible Mandibular notch Mental foramen Mandibular ramus Mandibular angle Coronoid process
    [Show full text]
  • Skeletal System + Joints)
    Chapters 6­10 (Skeletal system + joints) Exercise 6: Introduction to the Skeletal System. Figure 6.1 Axial or Appendicular (Divisions) Figure 6.2 Major bones in the body Figure 6.3 Bone “Classification” Figure 6.5‐6.6 Bone model and slides (parts) Table 6.2 Terminology Exercise 7: Appendicular Skeleton Scapula: o Acromion process o Scapular notch o Coracoid process o Supraspinous fossa o Glenoid Cavity o Spine o Lateral (axillary) border o Subscapular fossa o Inferior angle o Medial boarder o Superior angle o Infraspinous fossa o Superior boarder Clavicle o Coronoid turbercle o Sternal end o Acromial end Humerous o Head o Olecranon fossa o Greater turbercle o Lateral epicondyle o Lesser tubercle o Medial epicondyle o Deltoid tuberosity o Capitulum o Radial fossa o Trochlea o Coronoid fossa Radius o Head o Ulnar notch o Neck o Styloid process o Radial tuberosity Ulna o Olecranon process o Radial notch o Trochlear notch o Head of the ulna o Coronoid process o Styloid process Hand o Carpals o Metacarpals o Phalanges Pelvic girdle (7.6 and 7.7) o Sacrum o Coxal bone o Sacrolilliac joint . Illium o Acetabulum . Pubis o Symphysis pubis . Ischium o Obturator foramen o Ischial tuberosity o Iliac crest o Ischial ramus o Illiac fossa Femur o Head o Fovea capitis o Greater trochanter o Body o Neck o Lateral epicondyle o Intertrochanteric line o Medial epicondyle (anterior) o Patellar groove o Intertrochanteric crest o Medial condyle (posterior) o Lateral condyle o Lesser trochanter o Intercondylar fossa Patella o Base o Apex Tibia
    [Show full text]
  • New Terminologia Anatomica: Cranium and Extracranial Bones of the Head P.P
    Folia Morphol. Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 477–486 DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2019.0129 R E V I E W A R T I C L E Copyright © 2021 Via Medica ISSN 0015–5659 eISSN 1644–3284 journals.viamedica.pl New Terminologia Anatomica: cranium and extracranial bones of the head P.P. Chmielewski Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland [Received: 12 October 2019; Accepted: 17 November 2019; Early publication date: 3 December 2019] In 2019, the updated and extended version of Terminologia Anatomica was published by the Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology (FIPAT). This new edition uses more precise and adequate anatomical names compared to its predecessors. Nevertheless, numerous terms have been modified, which poses a challenge to those who prefer traditional anatomical names, i.e. medical students, teachers, clinicians and their instructors. Therefore, there is a need to popularise this new edition of terminology and explain these recent changes. The anatomy of the head, including the cranium, the extracranial bones of the head, the soft parts of the face and the encephalon, poses a particular challenge for medical students but also engenders enthusiasm in those of them who are astute learners. The new version of anatomical terminology concerning the human skull (FIPAT 2019) is presented and briefly discussed in this synopsis. The aim of this article is to present, popularise and explain these interesting modifications that have recently been endorsed by the FIPAT. Based on teaching experience at the Division of Anatomy/Department of Anatomy at Wroclaw Medical University, a brief description of the human skull is given here.
    [Show full text]