Annual Report 2001 • JBV Årsrapport (Eng) 28S.Zg 13.06.02 09:56 Side 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2001 • JBV Årsrapport (Eng) 28S.Zg 13.06.02 09:56 Side 2 • JBV årsrapport (eng) 28s.zg 13.06.02 09:56 Side 1 Annual Report 2001 • JBV årsrapport (eng) 28s.zg 13.06.02 09:56 Side 2 Contents Director General’s review .................................. 1 What is Jernbaneverket? .................................. 2 Organisational structure .................................... 3 The Norwegian railway network ...................... 4 Safety .................................................................... 7 Punctuality .......................................................... 11 Traffic volumes on the public rail network .... 12 Infrastructure operations and maintenance .. 15 Development of the rail network .................... 16 Railways and the environment ........................ 18 International activities ...................................... 21 Personnel and working environment.............. 22 State Accounts for 2001 .................................... 23 Cover:Tensioning wheel – part of the catenary system (Photo: Rune Fossum) Inside cover: Signalling control (Photo: Rune Fossum) • JBV årsrapport (eng) 28s.zg 13.06.02 09:56 Side 1 Director General’s review 2001 was a year of learning new lessons.There has to be no room for doubting that rail is a safe form of transport. A great deal of expenditure, time and effort has been devoted to improving the safety of railway infrastructure and train operations.The series of accidents in 2000 dealt a blow to the safe reputation of our railways. Public confidence is essential to our reputation. We know that confidence takes years to build up, but only seconds to demolish. We are in the process of rebuilding public con- fidence, step by step, and we can see the light at the end of the tunnel. Steinar Killi, Director General (Foto: Scanpix) Rail traffic picked up towards the end of peting forms of transport over the mote rail as a safe, competitive form of the year. Air traffic suffered a setback coming years. A political declaration on transport, forming part of an integrated after September 11.The horrific images the future scope and standard of the rail network. It is therefore essential that of hijacked passenger jets crashing into network is urgently required. Current everyone within the organisation is the World Trade Center in New York pro- levels of funding will not produce better familiar with the principal objectives, bably caused many air travellers, in train services – on the contrary, we shall and that the declared strategies are Norway as elsewhere, to switch to other have to put up with continuing delays followed. forms of transport.This was one factor and infrequent services for the foreseea- Following the restructuring, the behind the increase in passenger rail ble future. executive management team reporting traffic. 2001 also saw work start on the new to the Director General consists of four The transformation of Jernbane- double track between Skøyen and Asker, Executive Directors, the Director of verket’s safety culture from an incident- intended to eliminate Norway’s worst Safety, and the Director of International based to a risk-based one continued rail traffic bottleneck.The project will and Administrative Affairs. During the throughout 2001. An action plan for proceed in stages and will dominate year, Jernbaneverket also embarked on safety-related improvements was imple- Jernbaneverket’s construction activities a reorganisation of traffic management. mented during the first half of the year. for the ten-year period up to 2012.The By summer 2002, this activity will have This work was conducted as a dedicated Sande double-tracking scheme was been removed from the control of the project, with a view to getting the pro- completed in 2001, giving much greater regions and integrated with central cess of improvement under way faster. flexibility and shorter journey times on management.The Telecommunication The transition to a risk-based safety the Vestfold line. New freight terminals Services business was hived off into a culture will continue to dominate Jern- are planned for Trondheim and the separate limited company, BaneTele AS, baneverket’s activities in the years Stavanger area. However, figures produ- from 1 July 2001. ahead. ced by NSB and Jernbaneverket show Jernbaneverket’s finances are under During the year, the Government of that the Leangen terminal in Trondheim control.The cash accounts show an Norway presented its National Transport is not needed to handle current freight overspend in 2001 of NOK 54.874m in Plan for the years 2002–11.The plan was volumes. Jernbaneverket is therefore relation to the budget allocation. subsequently approved by Parliament disputing whether it is necessary to At 31 December 2001, and will, if fully implemented, maintain spend NOK 500m on a facility that is not Jernbaneverket had 3 577 permanent rail’s competitiveness over the next ten required at present, and we have asked employees. Jernbaneverket is a chang- years. Unfortunately, not all the paper the Ministry of Transport and ing organisation, and as in previous commitments have been backed up Communications to look into this. years, our staff have shown a great deal with hard cash. It is already clear from On 1 June 2001, Jernbaneverket’s of loyalty and flexibility. I should like to the State Budget for 2002 that the new organisational structure, principal thank them all for their hard work in necessary finance to see through the objectives and strategies took effect.The 2001. first year of the plan will not be forth- six principal objectives cover safety, coming.The capital expenditure short- finance and efficiency, human resources, fall is over NOK 600m, a level of funding competitiveness, punctuality, and envi- 35% below that envisaged in the plan. ronmental protection. Jernbaneverket As a consequence, rail will be unable to aims to help the country achieve its improve its position in relation to com- transport policy objectives and to pro- Steinar Killi 1 • JBV årsrapport (eng) 28s.zg 13.06.02 09:56 Side 2 What is Jernbaneverket? Jernbaneverket (the Norwegian National Rail Administration) was esta- blished on 1 December 1996 as a public body reporting to the Ministry of Transport and Communications. Jernbaneverket is responsible for managing the public railway network and making it available to licensed train operators in a non-discriminatory manner.The Director General is in overall charge of Jernbaneverket. Jernbaneverket’s Instructions from Government were set out in a Royal Decree dated 18 June 1999. work is therefore a socioeconomic task, Jernbaneverket’s principal Railway operations involve interaction which has to be viewed in the same con- objectives are: between infrastructure, traffic manage- text as other socioeconomic activities. I Rail transport must not result in loss ment and rolling-stock. Jernbaneverket’s Jernbaneverket aims to help the of human life, serious human injury, infrastructure management remit also country achieve its transport policy or serious damage to rolling-stock or includes responsibility for systemwide objectives and to promote rail as a safe, the environment. All changes must safety on the railways.This responsibility competitive form of transport, forming be geared towards improving safety, is exercised by Jernbaneverket itself part of an integrated network. to ensure that rail remains the safest taking charge of infrastructure and traf- During 2001, Jernbaneverket drew form of land-based transport. fic management while ensuring, through up strategies and principal objectives for track access agreements and capacity the following six core areas: I Jernbaneverket must make better allocation, that train operators are in a use of resources in exercising its position to comply with infrastructure I Safety responsibilities and conducting its and traffic management requirements in I Punctuality operations. terms of rolling-stock and staff compe- I Competitiveness tence. I Human resources I Jernbaneverket must be an attractive I Environmental protection workplace. Jernbaneverket is responsible for: I Finace and efficiency I Developing and operating a rail net- I Jernbaneverket must work to in- work that meets the requirements of These objectives are intended to provide crease rail’s market share where rail society and the market in terms of direction for the internal management transport is socioeconomically viable. safety, accessibility, speed, axleload, of the business. train frequency, loading gauge, com- I At least 90% of all trains must fort, ambience, environmental protec- run on time. tion and public information I Jernbaneverket must enhance I Railway stations and terminals, the environmental benefits of rail including public spaces, access, car transport. parks and other public facilities Punctuality necessary for users of rail services I Timetabling, i.e. allocating train paths to operators (capacity allocation) resourcesHuman Safety I Traffic management, i.e. operational control of traffic on the rail network I Regulation of the public rail network I Studies and planning in the rail sector Environ- I Competitiveness Entering into track access agree- protectionmental ments with train operators licensed to run services on the public rail net- work Finance and efficiency The public rail network is a vital part of the infrastructure of society. Development and operation of the net- 2 • JBV årsrapport (eng) 28s.zg 13.06.02 09:56 Side 3 Organisational structure Jernbaneverket reports directly to the Ministry of Transport and Communications.The Ministry monitors the activities
Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Short Term Precipitation in Norway 1967-2010
    no. 15/2011 Climate ANALYSIS OF SHORT TERM PRECIPITATION IN NORWAY 1967-2010 Jostein Mamen, Rasmus Benestad and Jan Erik Haugen Photo: Einar Egeland . Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Observation of short term precipitation in Norway . 4 1.2 Types of stations . 4 1.2.1 Tipping bucket rain gauge stations . 4 1.2.2 Weight pluviometer stations . 4 2 Rainfall rate statistics from tipping bucket rain gauge data 5 2.1 Maximum recorded 1 minute values . 5 2.2 Seasonal variations . 8 3 Rainfall rate statistics from weight pluviometer data 10 3.1 Maximum recorded 1 hour values . 10 3.2 Seasonal variations . 12 3.3 Conversion method from 1 hour to 1 minute precipitation . 12 4 Rainfall rate maps 13 4.1 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.001 % of the time . 13 4.2 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.01 % of the time . 16 4.2.1 Monthly values . 19 4.3 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.1 % of the time . 19 4.4 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.5 % of the time . 22 5 Rainfall rate trends from tipping bucket data and return periods 24 5.1 Rainfall rate trends . 24 5.1.1 Trends of maximum annual 1-minute intensity . 24 5.1.2 Trends of intensity exceeded 0.01 % of the time . 24 5.2 Return periods . 24 6 Methods used to derive rainfall intensity data from long term historical data set 26 7 Appendix - list of stations 33 3 1 Introduction In telecommunication heavy precipitation can lead to outage. [1], [4]. Met.no is therefore asked to analyze short term precipitation in Norway, down to one minute's time resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Railway Accident with Freight Car Set That Rolled Uncontrolledly from Alnabru to Sydhavna on 24 March 2010
    Issued March 2011 REPORT JB 2011/03 REPORT ON RAILWAY ACCIDENT WITH FREIGHT CAR SET THAT ROLLED UNCONTROLLEDLY FROM ALNABRU TO SYDHAVNA ON 24 MARCH 2010 Accident Investigation Board Norway • P.O. Box 213, N-2001 Lillestrøm, Norway • Phone: + 47 63 89 63 00 • Fax: + 47 63 89 63 01 www.aibn.no • [email protected] This report has been translated into English and published by the AIBN to facilitate access by international readers. As accurate as the translation might be, the original Norwegian text takes precedence as the report of reference. The Accident Investigation Board has compiled this report for the sole purpose of improving railway safety. The object of any investigation is to identify faults or discrepancies which may endanger railway safety, whether or not these are causal factors in the accident, and to make safety recommendations. It is not the Board’s task to apportion blame or liability. Use of this report for any other purpose than for railway safety should be avoided. Photos: AIBN and Ruter As Accident Investigation Board Norway Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTIFICATION OF THE ACCIDENT ............................................................................................. 4 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INFORMATION ABOUT THE ACCIDENT ..................................................................... 6 1.1 Chain of events ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Product Manual
    PRODUCT MANUAL The Sami of Finnmark. Photo: Terje Rakke/Nordic Life/visitnorway.com. Norwegian Travel Workshop 2014 Alta, 31 March-3 April Sorrisniva Igloo Hotel, Alta. Photo: Terje Rakke/Nordic Life AS/visitnorway.com INDEX - NORWEGIAN SUPPLIERS Stand Page ACTIVITY COMPANIES ARCTIC GUIDE SERVICE AS 40 9 ARCTIC WHALE TOURS 57 10 BARENTS-SAFARI - H.HATLE AS 21 14 NEW! DESTINASJON 71° NORD AS 13 34 FLÅM GUIDESERVICE AS - FJORDSAFARI 200 65 NEW! GAPAHUKEN DRIFT AS 23 70 GEIRANGER FJORDSERVICE AS 239 73 NEW! GLØD EXPLORER AS 7 75 NEW! HOLMEN HUSKY 8 87 JOSTEDALSBREEN & STRYN ADVENTURE 205-206 98 KIRKENES SNOWHOTEL AS 19-20 101 NEW! KONGSHUS JAKT OG FISKECAMP 11 104 LYNGSFJORD ADVENTURE 39 112 NORTHERN LIGHTS HUSKY 6 128 PASVIKTURIST AS 22 136 NEW! PÆSKATUN 4 138 SCAN ADVENTURE 38 149 NEW! SEIL NORGE AS (SAILNORWAY LTD.) 95 152 NEW! SEILAND HOUSE 5 153 SKISTAR NORGE 150 156 SORRISNIVA AS 9-10 160 NEW! STRANDA SKI RESORT 244 168 TROMSØ LAPLAND 73 177 NEW! TROMSØ SAFARI AS 48 178 TROMSØ VILLMARKSSENTER AS 75 179 TRYSILGUIDENE AS 152 180 TURGLEDER AS / ENGHOLM HUSKY 12 183 TYSFJORD TURISTSENTER AS 96 184 WHALESAFARI LTD 54 209 WILD NORWAY 161 211 ATTRACTIONS NEW! ALTA MUSEUM - WORLD HERITAGE ROCK ART 2 5 NEW! ATLANTERHAVSPARKEN 266 11 DALSNIBBA VIEWPOINT 1,500 M.A.S.L 240 32 DESTINATION BRIKSDAL 210 39 FLØIBANEN AS 224 64 FLÅMSBANA - THE FLÅM RAILWAY 229-230 67 HARDANGERVIDDA NATURE CENTRE EIDFJORD 212 82 I Stand Page HURTIGRUTEN 27-28 96 LOFOTR VIKING MUSEUM 64 110 MAIHAUGEN/NORWEGIAN OLYMPIC MUSEUM 190 113 NATIONAL PILGRIM CENTRE 163 120 NEW! NORDKAPPHALLEN 15 123 NORWEGIAN FJORD CENTRE 242 126 NEW! NORSK FOLKEMUSEUM 140 127 NORWEGIAN GLACIER MUSEUM 204 131 STIFTELSEN ALNES FYR 265 164 CARRIERS ACP RAIL INTERNATIONAL 251 2 ARCTIC BUSS LOFOTEN 56 8 AVIS RENT A CAR 103 13 BUSSRING AS 47 24 COLOR LINE 107-108 28 COMINOR AS 29 29 FJORD LINE AS 263-264 59 FJORD1 AS 262 62 NEW! H.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Inaccurate: Causes and Consequences of Train Delays
    Summary: Measuring the inaccurate: Causes and consequences of train delays TØI Report 1459/2015 Author(s): Askill Harkjerr Halse, Vegard Østli and Marit Killi Oslo 2015, 71 pages Norwegian language In this report, we argue that the rich available data on train performance and railway infrastructure should be used to get precise measurements of economic relationships in railway management. As one such exercise, we first show how temporary speed reductions on railway links caused by low infrastructure quality affects running time and delays for Norwegian freight trains. Even though each speed reduction only adds about 44-50 seconds to running time, speed reductions still contribute to delay at the destination. Secondly, we show that delays has a negative effect on demand for passenger and freight trains services. The corresponding demand elasticity is lower than the one implied by willingness-to-pay studies, consistent with evidence from Great Britain. In is widely acknowledged in the transportation economics literature that more reliable transport time constitutes an economic benefit. In the presence of unreliability, individuals and firms adjust by taking costly measures like departing early or keeping a safety stock of goods. The ‘cost’ of train delays is therefore the foregone benefits that could have been achieved if all trains were running on time. Much of the existing literature on railway punctuality is based on optimization and/or simulation, calling for more empirical studies. In the innovation project PRESIS, funded by the Research Council of Norway and the Norwegian National Rail Administration, we have developed methods to survey reliability in the Norwegian rail sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Accesrailqr1.Pdf
    Acknowledgement: This document was developed by Galileo International, Training and Development. Customer feedback is important to us. Please take a few minutes to send any questions or comments to us at [email protected] ©2005 Galileo International. All Rights Reserved. Apollo, Galileo, the Globe device, Galileo 360o Learning, Best Buy Quote, Claim PNR, Custom Check, Focalpoint, Front Page News, Galileo 360 o Fares, GlobalWare, Inside Availability, Inside Link, Preview Plus, TravelScreen, Private Fares, PRO-files, Queue Manager, Scriptwriter Plus, Travel Directory, and Viewpoint are either registered trademarks or service marks of Galileo International in the United States and/or other countries. 8/05 GB AccesRail Quick Reference, August 2005 1 Contents AccesRail Products ....................................................................................................................3 AccesRail Facts ..........................................................................................................................4 AccesRail Rail Passes/Rules .....................................................................................................4 BritRail Pass ............................................................................................................................. 4 Eurail Pass (Available U.S./Canada only) ................................................................................. 5 Norway in a Nutshell Pass (Available U.S./Canada only) ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rebuilding Efforts to Take Years News Officials Estimate All Schools in Oslo Were Evacu- Ated Oct
    (Periodicals postage paid in Seattle, WA) TIME-DATED MATERIAL — DO NOT DELAY News In Your Neighborhood A Midwest Celebrating 25 welcome Se opp for dem som bare vil years of Leif leve sitt liv i fred. to the U.S. De skyr intet middel. Erikson Hall Read more on page 3 – Claes Andersson Read more on page 13 Norwegian American Weekly Vol. 122 No. 38 October 21, 2011 Established May 17, 1889 • Formerly Western Viking and Nordisk Tidende $1.50 per copy Norway.com News Find more at www.norway.com Rebuilding efforts to take years News Officials estimate All schools in Oslo were evacu- ated Oct. 12 closed due to it could take five danger of explosion in school years and NOK 6 fire extinguishers. “There has been a manufacturing defect billion to rebuild discovered in a series of fire extinguishers used in schools government in Oslo. As far as I know there buildings have not been any accidents be- cause of this,” says Ron Skaug at the Fire and Rescue Service KELSEY LARSON in Oslo. Schools in Oslo were Copy Editor either closed or had revised schedules the following day. (blog.norway.com/category/ Government officials estimate news) that it may take five years and cost NOK 6 billion (approximately Culture USD 1 billion) to rebuild the gov- American rapper Snoop Dogg ernment buildings destroyed in the was held at the Norwegian bor- aftermath of the July 22 terrorist der for having “too much cash.” attacks in Oslo. He was headed to an autograph Rigmor Aasrud, a member of signing at an Adidas store on the Labor Party and Minister of Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Indra Navia As in Norway
    Page 1 February 2018 Contents 1. FLYTOGET, THE AIRPORT EXPRESS TRAIN................................................................................................................................... 1 2. RUTER – PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN OSLO AND AKERSHUS ................................................................................................... 2 3. GETTING THE TRAIN TO ASKER................................................................................................................................................... 4 4. HOTEL IN ASKER ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 5. EATING PLACES IN ASKER ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 6. TAXI ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 7. OSLO VISITOR CENTRE - OFFICIAL TOURIST INFORMATION CENTRE FOR OSLO ........................................................................ 10 8. HOTEL IN OSLO ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 WELCOME TO INDRA NAVIA AS IN NORWAY 1. Flytoget, the Airport Express Train The Oslo Airport Express Train (Flytoget)
    [Show full text]
  • General Technology Strategy
    General technology strategy 1 Contents Foreword 3 Introduction 4 Strategy process 5 The National Rail Administration business strategy 6 Requirements and performance targets 7 Technological trends and development features 9 Framework conditions for choosing technology 14 General technology strategy 20 Firm links with the National Rail Administration’s focus areas 22 Contact us 23 2 Foreword Anita Skauge Executive Director, Strategic Planning Jernbaneverket, the Norwegian National Rail Administration, is currently facing major technological challenges in conjunction with choosing the technical systems and facilities of tomorrow. This applies both when carrying out renewals and in the construction of new infrastructure. The challenges imply a need for a general technology strategy that clarifies goals and guides for technological choices. In this context, the central approaches to problems may include: • The choice of the technological platforms of the future and performance requirements for central facilities and systems • Management of the ageing stock of facilities, in terms of maintenance, prioritisation and pace of renewal • International standardisation and requirements for interoperability • Accelerating development and use of ICT-based railway engineering facilities and systems The strategy has been drawn up primarily for internal use, and shall be used mainly as a basis for investigations and principal plans where alternative technological choices and solutions are to be evaluated, and in the procurement of technical systems and facilities. We assume that the strategy can also be useful in other contexts, such as in conjunction with technical discussions with railway undertakings, suppliers and railway administrations. Anita Skauge Executive Director, Strategic Planning Introduction Technology strategy is a broad term, for signalling systems, energy supply and and initially it was necessary to limit and KVIKT (Kjørevei [Eng: track], Informasjon prioritise in order to make the scope [Eng: information], Kommunikasjon manageable.
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR Is a State-Owned Company Respon- Sible for the National Railway Infrastructure
    1 Upcoming projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR is a state-owned company respon- sible for the national railway infrastructure. Our mission is to ensure accessible railway infra- structure and efficient and user-friendly ser- vices, including the development of hubs and goods terminals. The company’s main responsible are: • Planning, development, administration, operation and maintenance of the national railway network • Traffic management • Administration and development of railway property Bane NOR has approximately 4,500 employees and the head office is based in Oslo, Norway. All plans and figures in this folder are preliminary and may be subject for change. 3 Never has more money been invested in Norwegian railway infrastructure. The InterCity rollout as described in this folder consists of several projects. These investments create great value for all travelers. In the coming years, departures will be more frequent, with reduced travel time within the InterCity operating area. We are living in an exciting and changing infrastructure environment, with a high activity level. Over the next three years Bane NOR plans to introduce contracts relating to a large number of mega projects to the market. Investment will continue until the InterCity rollout is completed as planned in 2034. Additionally, Bane NOR plans together with The Norwegian Public Roads Administration, to build a safer and faster rail and road system between Arna and Stanghelle on the Bergen Line (western part of Norway). We rely on close
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation Synchro Mermaids Competition 2020
    Synchro Mermaids competition 2020 Invitation Synchro Mermaids competition 2020 Saturday 28.03.2020, Holmen swimming pool in Asker - Norway Asker Synkron (a part of Asker Swimmingclub) have the pleasure of invite to the first Synchro Mermaids competition 2020. Synchro Mermaids is a new beginner competition. Synchro Mermaids competition 2020 Photo: Verkis.no Photo: Tone Lauluten Pool information: 25m x 21m. 2-meter-deep all over the pool. The water is chlorinated and has a temperature of 29 degrees. Holmen Svømmehall, Devikveien 6, 1394 Nesbru, Norway Participation: This competiton is for new beginners who are new to competing. Participation is for swimmers who have not previously competed with music programs and maximum 3 times in figures. All competitors will get competitors’ prices and/or diplomas. Age group categories and routines: Category Routine Type Age Award Beginner 9-11 years old figures Figures Competitors price Little (only Solo: 1 min Free routine and no ranking mermaids Norwegian Duet: 1 min Free routine (uapprobert) participants) Team: 1 min Free routine Synchro Mermaids competition 2020 Beginner 11-12 years figures Figures Competitors price Young old (only Solo: 1.30 Free routine and top 3 in each mermaids Nordic Duet: 1.30 Free routine category participants) Team: 1.30 Free routine Beginner figures Figures 13-15 years Competitors price Teenage Solo: 2 min Free routine old and top 3 in each mermaids Duet: 2 min Free routine (international) category Team: 2 min Free routine Age group categories and figures: Description of figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Bent knee back Sommersault Sommersault front Tub layout switching back tuck pike Back layout --> The figure is the Little tub position --> start of a ballet mermaids 360 degrees leg.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland, Norway & Faroes
    Port Handbook Chapter A - The Baltic Chapter B - United Kingdom & Ireland Chapter C - Atlantic Europe Chapter D - Iceland, Norway & Faroes Chapter E - Associated Members Copyright 2021 Cruise Europe Word of the chairman Matching cruise industry growth and cruise port capacities Cruise Europe and its more than 100 member ports between Gibraltar in the South, Kirkenes in the North and Lulea in the Baltic still has the potential for growth. Only 75% of the potential cruise ports along the Atlantic coast are members; also one has to include the potential of the cruise ports in Greenland and the area east of the North Cape. The tourist organisations of the ports, the regions, the countries can help as members to make Cruise Europe stronger in marketing the destination Northern Europe to the cruise lines. The aim for Cruise Europe is to match the ongoing growth of the cruise industry in offering better infrastructure in the member ports, which means more cruise terminals, or to point out the diversity of the many destinations and attractions in Northern Europe. Cruise Europe has to open a dialogue with the cruise lines with the intention to spread the growing number of cruise ships and the even bigger cruise passenger capacities over more ports, over more cruise areas, over more countries. The success of the Baltic is also possible in the areas of West Europe, of UK & Ireland and of Norway and Iceland. Cruise lines have to be convinced that all four cruise areas in Northern Europe have equal attractions and many Captain Michael McCarthy good ports to host the growing cruise fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Punktlighetsrapport 2007
    Punktlighetsrapport / Punctuality Report 2007 1 Innhold / Contens Forord / Introduction 3 Punktlighet / Punctuality 4 Persontrafikken / Passenger services 6 Lokaltog / Suburban 6 Flytoget / Gardermoen 10 Mellomdistanse / Regional 10 Strekningsvis punktlighet / Punctuality by line 12 Persontrafikk langdistanse / Long-distance passenger 12 Utlandstog / Cross-border 13 Godstrafikk / Freight 14 Punktlighet i togtrafikken / Train punctuality 1999–2007 16 Forsinkelsestimer / Hours lost to delays 2007 17 Forsinkelsesårsaker totalt / Overall causes of delays 17 Sporkapasitet / Track capacity 18 Flaskehalser / Bottlenecks 18 Kapasitetsforbedringer 2007 / Capacity enhancements in 2007 20 Eksempler på beregnet tidstap ved saktekjøringer / Examples on time lost owing to speed restrictions 21 Krav til oppetid / Uptime requirements 22 Trafikkutvikling / Traffic changes 25 Persontrafikken / Passenger services 25 Godstrafikken / Freight 26 2 Forord / Introduction Jernbaneverkets andel av forsinkelser i togtrafikken, inklu- Jernbaneverket’s rate of train delays and cancellations is sive innstillinger (kanselleringer) defineres som ”oppetid”. described as the infrastructure’s “uptime”. To meet the target For å tilfredsstille behovet for oppetid mht punktlighet, for uptime in punctuality terms, which should be close to som bør være nær 100 %, er det stilt krav til de forhold som 100%, we apply requirements in respect of the following påvirker dette; contributory factors: – tidstap på grunn av saktekjøringer. – Time lost owing to speed restrictions – forsinkelsestimer og innstillinger av tog som skyldes – Delays and service cancellations owing to infrastructure forhold i infrastrukturen. conditions – høy tilgjengelighet og lav feilfrekvens i anleggene til – High levels of availability and low failure rates in Jernbane- Jernbaneverkets. verket’s infrastructure Dette er viktige bidrag til god punktlighet og regularitet. These factors play a major part in good timekeeping and service reliability.
    [Show full text]