INFORMATION TO USERS
This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted.
The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction.
1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity.
2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame.
3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again-beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
4. For illustrations that cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by xerographic means, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and inserted into your xerographic copy. These prints are available upon request from the Dissertations Customer Services Department.
5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed.
UniversiV MIcixSilms International 300 N. Z eeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106
8311751
Hassan, Ahmed Mostafa-Mi
INDANPROPIONIC ACID PGF(2ALPHA) ANTAGONISTS
The Ohio State University Ph.D. 1983
University Microfilms I ntern sti G nal 300 n . zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106
Copyright 1983 by Hassan, Ahmed Mostafa-Mi All Rights R eserved
INDANPROPIONIC ACID PCF 2a ANTAGONISTS
DISSERTATION
Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for
the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate
School of the Ohio State University
By
Ahmed M M . Hassan, B.S., M.S.
*****
The Ohio State University
1983
Reading Committee:
Donald T. Witiak, Ph. D. Duane D. Miller, Ph. D. Ralf G . Rahwan, Ph. D . Larry V. Robertson, Ph. D. ✓~>Appr oved
Adviser College of Pharmacy To Those Who Made it Possible,
My Parents, My Wife and My Educators
ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to express my sinscere appreciation to my adviser. Professor Donald T. Witiak, for his valuable guidance, encouragement, understanding, and financial support throughout this work.
I wish to thank Professor Ralf G. Rahwan, for helpful discussions and for facilitating the biological evaluation of the compounds and for financial support on National Institute of Health grant No. HD-14853.
I wish to thank Dr. Richard J. Heaslip and Dr. Franziska R. Del Vecchio for carrying out the biological evaluation on these compounds. Special thanks are due to Mr. Jack Fowble and Miss. Anna Liao who provided assistance in NMR and mass spectroscopy technology and to Mr. Nicholas E. Felt who provided considerable assistance to me in the library.
Finally I am particularly grateful to my parents and my wife Sarnia for their love and encouragement during the course of these studies.
iii VITA
January 17, 1950 ...... Born- Alexandria, Egypt.
1968-1973 ...... B.S.(hons.), University of Alexandria.
1977 ...... M.S. University of Alexandria.
1978-1980 ...... Teaching Associate, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
1980-1983 ...... Research Associate, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
PUBLICATIONS
Ragab M. Shafic, Raafat Soliman and Ahmed M. M. Hassan New Biphenylyl Derivatives:l-(A-Biphenylyl)-2-phenylethylamines : Potential Antispasmodic and Cardiovascular Agents, J. Pharm. Sci. 991, 1978.
Richard J. Heaslip, Ralf G. Rahwan, Ahmed M. M. Hassan and Donald T. Witiak Uterine Relaxant effects of Mono- and Di- benzyloxyindanpropionic Acids Res. Comm. Chem. Path, and Pharm. 32, 251, 1981.
FIELDS OF STUDY
Major Fields: Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry Medicinal Organic Chemistry
Iv TABLE OF CONTENTS
page
DEDICATION ...... il
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...... ill
VITA ...... iv
LIST OF FIGURES ...... vi
LIST OF TABLES ...... vii
INTRODUCTION ...... 1
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ...... 4
PROSTAGLANDIN ANTAGONISTS ...... 21
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM ...... 44
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...... 52
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION ...... 58
PHARMACOLOGY ...... 74
REFERENCES ...... 78 LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1. Bioconversion of Linoleic Acidto Prostaglandin .. 10
2. Prostaglandin Biosynthesis ...... 11
3. A Probable Relationship between Prostaglandin and
Physiological Effect ...... 17
4. Schematic Representation of the Synthesis of
Prostaglandin in the LH-responsive Cell...... 20
5. The Hairpin and L-shaped Conformation of PGF2 q
and PGB^ ...... 47
vi LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1. Effect of Compounds 44 . 45 and 5_1_ on PGF^g-lnduced
Contractions of The Mouse Uterus ...... 76
vii Chapter I
INTRODUCTION
Premature labor and spontaneous abortion are the most common pathological complications of pregnancy. It is estimated that about 1 0 % of the total number of pregnancies end in spontaneous abortions despite available therapy.
Existing uterine relaxants lack selectivity for uterine smooth muscle. Thus, adrenergic g^-receptor agonists, while effectively relaxing the pregnant uterus, may exert adrenergic effects elsewhere. Furthermore, the uterine relaxant effect of alcohol is not without its technical difficulties, and the value and safety of progestational drugs for the maintenance of complicated pregnancies have recently been questioned. Consequently, there is considerable interest in the development of new and more selective uterine relaxants.
Effects of prostaglandins on the female reproductive system are particularly striking. PGF2 Q appears to 1-3 participate in the etiology of spontaneous abortion » aod inhibitors of prostaglandin synthetase (cyclooxygenase) have recently been reported to be effective and relatively safe 3 in the prevention of spontaneous abortion in women • There is a need for development of a specific primary
- 1 - 2
prostaglandin antagonist. The variety of responses of
pulmonary and systemic arterial pressure of PCs suggests
that these responses are mediated by different PG
receptors*. Salicylates and other nonsteroidal, anti
inflammatory compounds block the synthesis of all endogenous
PCs by inhibiting the enzymatic oxygenation and cyclization
of arachidonic acid^* These agents do not differentiate the
responses of different prostanoic substances.
Antagonists specific for each PG species would aid
identifying a receptor mechanism. However, few potent,
selective PG antagonists have been identified in vivo to
date^. A pharmacological antagonist should be specific,
potent, reversible and possess no agonist activity. The
objective of this work was to develop specific primary PG
antagonists which:
(1 ) could serve as molecular probes in the elucidation of
the roles of PG agonists in physiological and pharmacologi
cal processes and;
(2 ) may be useful therapeutic agents in the treatment of
various disorders.
The original series of 2-indanpropionic acids^ which
provided the impetus for the present study involved
2 -propyl-5 ,6 -dibenzyloxy-l-oxo-2 -indanpropionic acid (J^) which was found to selectively and reversibly inhibit PGp2:j — 5 on the isolated mouse ileum at a concentration of 3x10 M. This compound exhibited significantly less inhibitory activity against acetylcholine- (AcCh) or potassium chloride-induced contractions. Higher concentrations of ^ -4 (10 H or greater) significantly inhibited the contractions induced by PGF2 Q , AcCh and potassium chloride.
C 0 2 H o Chapter II
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
In 1930 Kurzrok and leib^ found that human semen both relaxed and contracted human uterine muscle strips. From these observations, they inferred the presence in semen of
8 9 two substances, one contractile, the other relaxant * • A few years later Goldblatt^^ isolated a depressor like substance from human seminal plasma that contracted isolated rabbit intestine and isolated guinea-pig uterus. At about
T 1 12 the same time, von Euler * found that similar activity was displayed by extracts of prostate glands and seminal 13 lA vesicles of several animal species. In 1935 von Euler * coined the name "prosaglandin" for the substance, known to be an acidic lipid. An extensive description of the pharmacological properties of this substance was later published.
Over the next 30 years, interest in prostaglandins declined. However, the isolation, characterization and synthesis of representative compounds in the early 1960s generated a renewed interest. Prostaglandins have been detected in virtually every tissue and body fluid; their production increases in response to numerous diverse stimuli. These substanses produce, in minute amounts, a
- 4 - 5 broad spectrum of effects that embrace practically every biological function. Inhibition of PG biosynthesis is now recognized as the mechanism by which nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs such as aspirin exert their effects. In
1964 Bergstrom and coworkers^^ ’ and van Dorp and associ- 17 18 ates * independently achieved the biosynthesis of PGEg from arachidonic acid using homogenates of sheep seminal vesicles.
Nomenclature
Prostaglandins are a family of closely related fatty acids containing a cyclopentane ring with two adjacent side chains, one of which has a carboxyl group at a terminal position. The naturally occuring prostaglandins may be regarded as derivatives of prostanoic acid 2 » whose carbon atoms are numbered as shown. Although they may be named by their relationship to prostanoic acid, the natural prostaglandins are usually divided into five groups and are referred to by the letters A, B, C, E and F.
All five groups feature a hydroxyl function at and a trans double bond at the 13, 14 position. The E and F series are frequently referred to as primary prostaglandins.
Both possess an additional hydroxyl group at The E series contains a carbonyl group at Cg, whereas the F series has a hydroxyl group at that position. The A, B and C series may be regarded as cyclopentene dehydration products of the E series. These three series lack a hydroxyl group at Cii, but possess a double bond in the ring.
ÔH
PGEj (3)
OH
C O ^ H C O 2 H
OH OH
PGEj U)
CO 2 H CO 2 H
PGA, (2)
■ C O 2 H
PGEj (B) PGCj (9 ) 7
Each of these five series is subdivided on the basis of
the number of additional side chain double bonds present.
The total number of double bonds is indicated by a subscript
numeral after the letter denoting the series. Therefore,
prostaglandin (PGE^j contains only the double
bond. PGE2 has an additional cis double bond at C5 g and
PGEg possesses a third double bond at ^17 18* These
additional side chain double bonds occur in the same
positions and with the same configuration for all five
series, although prostaglandins PGA3 , PGBg, and PGCg have
never been isolated from natural sources.
Since all naturally occuring PGs isolated to date have
the (X configuration at Cjj and this designation is
normally omitted in abbreviated forms. In the F series a erg
are used to denote the configuration at Cg.
To denote various stereochemical changes differing
terms are employed. For example, if the two side chains bear a cis relationship to one another, the compounds are
termed 8 -isoprostaglandins (e.g., 6 -iso-PGF - [ r v )• Hydroxyl groups in the unnatural p-configuration at or are referred to as epi (e.g., 15-epi-PGEp). In addition, the
hydroxyl group may be named after the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog convention, i.e. 2 for theq and ^ for the p form.
Natural PGs are levorotatory. Their dextrotatory enan- tiomers are known by the prefex ent (e.g., ent-PGE^). lUPAC nomenclature for PGE^ 1s (11a , 13^,15^)-11,15 —dihydroxy-
9-oxoprost-l3-en-l-oic acid. OH ÔH OH
8-lso-PGE^ (10) 11-epi-PGE^ (JJ^)
OH
O ^ H
OH OH ÔH
■nt-PGEi (12) PGFip (13)
Examples of Stereochemlchal Variations
of the Natural Prostaglandins 9
Prostaglandin Biochemistry
19 PGs are present In many mammalian tissues . Even
though relatively large amounts of PGs can be detected In
only a few tissues, the capacity for PG biosynthesis can be
demonstrated in all tissues except red blood cells. PGs are
rarely stored in tissues. Usually PGs are synthesized
rapidly, from tissue stores containing fatty acid precursors 20 in response to local stimulation • PG synthesis can be
initiated by mechanical (stretch or distension), chemical
(catecholamines, serotonin, histamine, AcCh, glucagon)j or 21 neuronal stimulation.
In 1930 it was discovered that linoleic acid (1_4) is a 2 2 necessary element in the diet of healthy rats • Lack of 14
caused poor growth, skin lesions, kidney damage, and 22 23 sterility * . This finding was later extended to other
species. Including humans. Subsequently, It was recognized
that many tissues convert linoleic acid (j^) to gamma-
linolenic acid (15) ; this intermediate afforded dihomo-
gamma-linolenic acid (1_6^) and arachidonic acid (17).
Presumably, these fatty acids are essential because they are
obligatory precursors of PGs^^’^^*^^ (Figure 1).
In man, arachidonic acid (1^) is either derived from
dietary linoleic acid (1_4) or is Ingested as a constituent
of meat. Estérification and incorporation of a phospholipid component of a cell membrane or other complex blo-lipld represents the physical state of PG in cells. Arachidonic 10
acid is released from membrane phospholipids by the action
of the enzyme phospholipase A g . Once released, arachidonic
acid is rapidly metabolized to oxygenated products by
distinct enzymatic mechanisms, a cyclooxygenase and a llpo-
oxygenase (Figure 2).
Linoleic acid (14) 1
gamma-Linolenic acid (15)
CO 2 H
Dihomo-gamma-Linolenic acid (lj6 ) _____ ^ PG^ series
Arachidonic acid (17) PG2 series
Figure 1. Bioconversion of Linoleic Acid to Prostaglandins 11
Arachidonic acid (17)
Fatty acid
cyclooxygenase
COOH
Lipooxygenase
COOH
COOH
bOH 0__ V . 0-0
12-HPETE (20)
I2-Hydroperoxy-5,8,10,14" 0 COOH eicosatetrenoic acid
I 0 bOH COOH
PGGj (18)
OH
'■COOH 12-Hydroxy-5,8,10,14- eicosatetrenoic acid (2 1 )
6h PGH2 (19)
PGEg (4) PGF2q<5)
Figure 2. Prostaglandin Biosynthesis 12
P rostaglandln Pharmacology
PGs display a wide diversity of biological
effec. They stimulate contraction and relaxation of
smooth muscle, secretion (including some endocrine gland
secretions), and blood flow. These individual effects, how
ever, may be quite specific for a given PG. For example j
PGF2q; raises blood pressure, while PGE2 lowers blood
pressure.
PG concentrations may be critical to peptic ulcer
development. Thus, PCE^ or PGE2 can inhibit gastric
secretions in dogs. Furthermore, these same PGs prevent
gastric and duodenal ulcers in rats.
PGs exert powerful actions on platelets. Some of them,
like PGE^^ are inhibitors of human platelet aggregations in
vitro at concentrations of 0 . 1 pM. PGE2 exerts variable
effects on platelets and is a potentiator of aggregation at
low concentraions (below 1 pM) and an inhibitor at higher
concentrations.
Both PGEj and E2 are powerful vasodilators. When given
intraarterially, they cause a fall in blood pressure which is accompanied by a reflex increase in heart rate owing to a direct dilation of vascular smooth muscles. The effect is not inhibited by a or p adrenergic agents, antihistamines, 36 37 LSD, ganglionic blocking agents, or vagotomy ’
PGs contract or relax many smooth muscles besides those of the vasculature. Response may vary with species, type of 13
P G , endocrine status of the tissue, and experimental
condition. Few smooth muscles are unaffected by PGs and may
display intense and consistent responses. In general, PGF
contracts and PGE relaxes bronchial and tracheal muscle from
various species, including man. Asthmatic individuals are
particularly sensitive wherein PGF2Q; causes intense bronchospa sm. In contrast, both PGE^ and E 2 are potent bronchdilators when given to such patients by aerosol; the potency of PGE^ may exceed that of isoproterenol^® ^ ^ «
PGs E and F produce strong contraction of isolated guinea pig uteri in estrus or diestrus. The contractile response is most prominent before menstruation. Uterine strips from pregnant women are uniformally contracted by PGE and PGF. In contrast to uterine behavior in vitro, the human uterus in vivo, whether pregnant or not, is always contracted by intravenously administered PGE^, PGE2 and PGF2Q.
The response is prompt and dose dependent.
Many stimulant and depressant effects of PGs on the 41—43 central nervous system (CNS) have been reported • PGEs cause sedation, stupor, catatonia and behavioral changes following injection into the cerebral ventricles of cats.
To elicit such effects higher concentrations of PGs are required.
In man, PGEs cause pain when injected intradermally.
PGEs irritate the mucous membranes of the eyes and respiratory passages. These effects are generally not as 14
immediate or intense as those caused by bradykinin or
histamine .
PGs, notably PGE^, inhibit the basal rate of lipolysis
from adipose tissue in vitro and also lipolysis stimulated
by exposure to catecholamines or other lipolytic hormones.
Such effects have been noted in vivo in various species j
including man. Low doses of PGE^ in man stimulate
lipolysis, presumably by an indirect effect mediated by 44 sympathetic stimulation
It has been suggested that the anti-inflamatory action of aspirin and certain other drugs may be attributed to their ability to block the biosynthesis of PGs^^* If this hypothesis is correct, then PGs may play a fundamental role not only in normal physiological functions but also in certain pathological conditions.
The mechanism of action of PGs is not completely under stood. They affect nearly all physiological processes. To place them in their proper perspective in mammalian physiology various investigators propsed that PGs act as
"autocoids"^^» "modulators"^^j"intracellular messengers"^®, and hormones.
One definition of a "classical hormone" is some substance that on stimulation of a gland or organ is released into the general circulation to act on distant tissues. It is not easy to rule out the possibility that
PGs act as intracellular messengers. Since most cells 15
synthesize PCs in response to hormones and other stimuli,
the newly synthesized PCs could function inside cells as 2+ regulators of cyclic nucleotide and Ca levels, or by 48 directly affecting enzyme activity . In the adipocyte,
PGEs contribute to the regulation of lipolysis by negative
feedback inhibition of 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate
(c-AMP), but the adipocyte may be an isolated example*^»
Calcium ion is a necessary component of many of the biological actions of c-AMP, and it is veil known that PCs 2+ affect Ca turnover in various systems by stimulating its release from subcellular binding sites^^’^^* In platelets, 2+ added Ca counteracts the inhibition of PGE^ on aggrega tion • It is possible that in some cases, PGs act as intracellular messengers by altering c-AMP levels via 2+ intracellular regulation of Ca transport.
In contrast to this postulation, Bito^^ has proposed that PGs are not intracellular messengers. He argues that
PG synthetase enzyme complex is embeded in cellular membranes in such a manner as to only release newly synthesized PGs into blood or extracellular fluid. There fore, PGs would not accumulate inside cells unless they are actively transported by specific carrier systems, such as are present in the ovaries and major metabolizing organs.
Thus, Bito suggested that PGs act only at cell membrane surfaces as local extracellular hormones. Since PG biosynthesis can be virtually abolished by nonlethal doses 16
of aspirin and indomethacin, their formation can not be
essential for the continued existence of the organism^^.
This fact, and most of what is known about PGs, is in
accordance with the concept that these substances are
secreted into extracellular space, or the local circulation,
to affect nearby cells.
Progress in the field of c-AMP research in the last 10
years has led to the development of the concept that c-AMP
is a "second messenger", that is, the agent of intracellular
information transfer between extracellular hormones and
intracellular enzymes • A large number of tissues respond
to their relevant hormones with increased intracellular
levels of c-AMP. c-AMP is produced by a hormone-sensitive
enzyme, adenylate cyclase, which resides in the plasma membrane and catalyzes formation of c-AMP from adenosine
triphosphate (ATP)^^~^^ (Figure 3). According to the second messenger concept, basal levels of a cellular response are
due to a steady state output of c-AMP, and increases or
decreases in cellular c-AMP concentrations. 17
5'GMP
PDE
Cyclic GMP
PG Contraction 2+ Ca
ATP 5 'AMP Relaxation
PDE
Cyclic AMP
Abbreviations: PDE, phosphorous diesterase; GTP, guanosine triphosphate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; AC, adenylate cyclase; R, regulatory protein.
Figure. 3 18
In the early 1970s, It was proposed that PG action s are
mediated by Except for the adipocyte, wherein
PGEs lower c-AMP levels in the stimulated cell, PGEs
generally increase intracellular levels of the cyclic
nucleotide in a dose-dependent manner.
Specific binding proteins have been shown to exist for
PGEs in mouse ovary, lipocyte, rat stomach, thyroid, and
other tissues^^’ • Protein receptors have sulfhydryl 19 groups and are located on the cell membrane . The receptors
appear to be specific for PGs and are likely associated with
adenylate cyclase.
PGF analogues only stimulate the synthesis of c-AMP at
high concentrations. At such concentrations PGE receptors
are not distinguishable from PGF receptors. The inability
of PGF2 q; to alter intracellular c-AMP levels provided
evidence that this cyclic nucleotide did not act alone as a
"second messenger" of hormone activity^^*
3',5'-Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (c-GMP) was found to promote cellular events in opposite fashion to c-AMP.
Altered intracellular concentrations of c-GMP are frequently associated with agents that produce effects opposite to c-
AMP. Rather than unidirectional control by c-AMP, Goldberg
5 8 and his associates have suggested that many biological systems are subject to bidirectional control by a balance of the opposing actions of c-AMP and c-GMP. Goldberg proposed the term "Yin-Yang" to describe the phenomenon. 19
Two kinds of bidIrectionally controlled systems are
proposed: A-type systems which are facilitated by c-AMP and
Inhibited by c-GMP, and B-types promoted by c-GMP and
suppresed by c-AMP^^’^^» Cardiac muscle contraction is one
example of an A-type. Contraction of vascular and uterine
smooth muscles, cell proliferation and leukotaxis are B-type 59 systems • B-type systems appear to be more common: release
of lysosomal enzymes from stimulated polymorphonuclear
leukocytes (PMNs) is enhanced by c-GMP and inhibited by c-
AMP*^ •
It was found that 10 ^ M PGFgQ, caused a .four— fold
increase in c-GMP levels in isolated rat uterus preparations
within 43 seconds^^* Oxytocin induced a rapid increase in
c-GMP levels in this tissue, with no further effect upon c-
6 2 AMP levels • Therefore, c-GMP was proposed to be related
to PGF activity and c-AMP related to PGE activity^^» go Recently, studies utilizing isolated bovine and canine veins have shown that the c-GMP/c-AMP ratio increases under the influence of PGF2 q, , whereas the reverse situation
is observed for PGE2 * Since PGï'2q: causes contraction and
PGE2 causes relaxation in this tissue, this finding is consistent with the concept that the opposing actions of E and F prostaglandins are expressed at the cyclic nucleotide level.
PGs are also thought to mediate the activity of luteinizing hormone (LH). Kuehl^^ has suggested that events 20
initiated by LH in promoting ovarian steroidogenesis
involves intermediates in the Scheme shown in Figure 4. In
this Scheme, LH causes the release of PGs which in turn
cause an Increase in the concentration of c-AMP. c-AMP
subsequently activates a protein kinase by binding to and
removing a regulator protein R from the actual catalytic
protein C. This protein kinase catalyzes the enzymatic
production of a phosphorylated protein which is essential
for promoting the synthesis of progestrone.
ATP a LH ^ PGE2 ^ c-AMP ^ ^ Progestrone
step c ATP C-AMP+ RC ^ _ R-C-AMP+ C ^ p-Pr f „ Progestr one
Abbreviations: L H , leuteinizing hormone; ATP, adenosine tri phosphate; R , regulatory subunit; C, cyclic AMP-dependent kinase; P-Protein, phosphorylated protein; c-AMP, cyclic-
AMP.
Figure. 4 Chapter III
PROSTAGLANDIN ANTAGONISTS
PGs seem to be Involved in an ever-increasing number of fundamental responses of cells and organs. Therefore, it is important to have specific PG antagonists to facilitate experimental differentiation and analysis of the roles of endogenous PGs. Furthermore, PG antagonists may be useful therapeutic agents in the treatment of a variety of conditions. The term "prostaglandin antagonist" is used here to denote a compound which selectively antagonizes the actions of PGs at the receptor and not compounds such as aspirin which depress the formation of PGs by inhibiting PG synthetase.
One drug can antagonize the effects of another by four separate and distinct mechanisms: Pharmacological, physiological, physical-chemical and biochemical. A pharmacological antagonist should be specific, potent, reversible and possess no agonist activity. Physiological antagonism takes place when two drugs act at different sites by different mechanisms to produce opposite effects that counterbalance one another. Thus, histamine and slow- reacting substance of anaphylaxis (SRS-A) cause constriction of the bronchioles, impairing normal breathing in asthmatic
- 21 - 22
patients; theophylline and isoproterenol are physiological
antagonists since they produce active dilation of these
respiratory airways by mechanisms not involving PG receptor
interaction. Such compounds are terminators of an acute
asthmatic attack.
Physical-chemical antagonism results when one drug
neutralizes or inactivates another owing to physical or
chemical interaction. Administration of chelating agents or
activated charcoal in the emergency treatment of acute
poisoning are common clinical applications of physical-
chemical antagonism.
Biochemical antagonism occurs when one drug indirectly
decreases the amount of another drug at its site of action.
A drug that decreases the rate at which another drug is
transported across a cell memberane, acts as a biochemical
antagonist. Many drugs have been shown to stimulate drug metabolizing enzyme systems in man or animals. This may
result in one drug activating the metabolism of another drug
that is being given at the same time. The result is a
shortening of its biological half life and a reduction in
its therapeutic effects. For example, exposure of rodents to pesticides such as DDT shortens the duration of action of the hypnotic drug hexobarbital.
One approach used to design antagonists includes synthesis of analogues of the agonist. Certain analogues may have high affinity for a receptor, but due to structural 23
modifications have no intrinsic activity. Such compounds
should act as competitive antagonists. Fried and associ-
ates^*'*^ found that numerous analogues of PGs with oxygen
in place of the methylene group in the 7-posltion of the
molecule specifically inhibited smooth muscle stimulating
properties of PGs. They found that racemic
7-oxoprostaglandin g, had smooth muscle stimulating
properties, but simpler members of the series were devoid of
such activity.
Various analogues (without oxygen functions at
positions 9, 11 and 15) were prepared (Compounds 23).
Many homologues including those having four or six-membered
rings were also synthesized. The degree of hydroxylation appears to be important for determining whether such compounds will behave as agonists or antagonists. Compounds with an oxygen function (hydroxyl or carbonyl) at C-9 and
C-11 were agonists, whether or not there also was a C-15
hydroxyl group (Compounds 2 _ ^ , 2 ^ ) . Compounds with no oxygen functions at C-9 and C-11 and with a C-15 hydroxyl group
(Compounds 2 2 . ) have either PGE^ agonist or antagonist activity. Compounds devoid of an oxygen function at C-9,11 and 15 (Compounds 22, 23) were found to be pure antagonists
(20 ng/ml, 50% inhibition) in the guinea-pig ileum, rabbit jejunum and gerbil colon^^«
The most specific antagonist found by Fried and his
associates'^ was 7-oxo-13-prostynoic acid ( 2 _ ! B ) which has 24
been separated into its optical isomers. The activity for
the two diasteromers has not been reported. Most compounds
(22, 23, 26 and 2 J _ ) were tested and found to produce 50%
inhibition of PGEj-induced contractions on the isolated
guinea-pig ileum and gerbil colon^^ at concentrations of
10-25 and 4-11 pg/ml, respectively.
( C H 2 h
22 23
els and trans
n- 1 , 2
Pure Antagonists
OH
H OH H OH
24 25
Pure Agonists 25
H OH 26 els and trans
Both Agonists and Antagonists
28
These compounds (32 pg/ml) were found to produce little or no inhibition of contractions induced by AcCh or
histamine on the guinea-pig ileum. Only compounds 21 and 2 T _
(with an acetylenic linkage in the 13,14-position) were specific antagonists for PGE^ on the gerbil colon. The six-membered ring analogues of 7-oxoprostanoic acid caused a shift in 2- and 3-point PGE^ dose-response curves to the right suggesting competitive antagonism. 26
7-0xo-13-prostynolc acid (7-OPyA; 2 3 _ ) and its 15-hydroxy
six-membered ring analogue 2 J _ were also found to inhibit
PGF^Q -induced contractions at concentrations of 10 and 41
IJg/ml, respectively. The most potent analogue, 7-OPyA has become the prototype PG antagonist of this series.
Flack^® tested fifteen of the 7-oxoprostaglandin analogues synthesized by Fried and his associates at a single concentration of 10 pg/ml on the isolated gerbil colon. 7-OPyA produced nearly 100% inhibition of
PGE j^-induced contractions with little or no inhibition of contractions induced by AcCh. Apparently, 7-OPyA was the only selective PG antagonist of the group. However, this compound was nonselective on the guinea-pig ileum and rabbit jejunum. Bennett and Posner^* reported that 7-OPyA was a nonselective PG antagonist on the guinea-pig ileum and colon
(2 -8 x10 ^M) and human stomach , ileum and colon
(5 . 5xlO~'^M-3xlO~^M). Vesin and Herbon^^ observed that 10 and 30 pM concentrations of 7-OPyA inhibited PGE^- induced contractions of the isolated rat uterus by 50 and 100%, respectively. Contractions induced by either oxytocin or carbamoylcholine were not inhibited by 45 pM 7-OPyA. 7-OPyA did not inhibit PGE^-induced increases in c-AMP levels in this tissue, indicating that inhibition of uterine contractions is dissociated from adenylate cyclase inhibition. However, Kuehl and his associates demonstrat ed that 7-OPyA (50-75 pg/ml) blocked the stimulatory effect 27
of PGEj, PGE2 and LH on c-AMP levels in the mouse ovary.
The antagonism was competitive in each case and inhibitor
constants were similar against each of the PG and LH. It was concluded that PGs are involved in stimulation of c-AMP levels induced by LH. 7-OPyA (400 pg/ml) was found to block
PG and LH stimulation of c-AMP formation in bovine luteal cells*^.
c-AMP formation produced by PGs and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) in isolated bovine thyroid cells and canine thyroid slices^^"^^ was inhibited by 7-OPyA (10~^M). Ozer and Sharp^^ reported that 7-OPyA (50 pg/ml) reversed PG inhibition of antidiuretic hormone stimulated c-AMP production in isolated preparations of toad bladder. In contrast, Marumo and Edelman^^ demonstrated the PG-like activity of 7-OPyA (10”^M) in hamster kidney homogenates.
7 8 7-OPyA and its 15-hydroxy analogue were found to bind to a lipocyte PG receptor and displace PGE^ from the receptor as would be expected for a competitive antagonist 79 although a high concentration was required. Rao found that 7-OPyA (160 pg/ml) inhibited {^H}-PGE^ binding to human chorionic gonadotropin in cell membranes of bovine corpora lutea. Furthermore, 7-OPyA (10 pg/ml) competed with PGE^ 80 for specific PG binding sites from rat forestomach
Interestingly, 7-OPyA at concentrations of 85 pg/ml also inhibited the enzymatic degradation of PC by
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (PGDH) purified from 28 O 1 swine lung . The reaction is inhibited in both the reverse 0 2 and forward directions (15-keto PG < ^ 15-hydroxy PG).
7-OPyA was also found to antagonize c-AMP dependent protein kinase^^ and the synthesis of rat ovary proteins®^ ( 1 0 0 pg/ ml). Also, at 15 pM 7-OPyA stimulated ATPase from platel ets, mitochondria and erythrocytes®^* 85 Various dibenzoxazepine derivatives have been shown to specifically inhibit certain PG actions. Competitive PG antagonism was observed on isolated smooth muscle preparations. The prototype compound designated as SC-19220
(29a) was first reported to be a specific PGE2 antagonist on the isolated guinea-pig ileum at concentrations of 1-50 pg/ ml. No significant antagonism of AcCh or bradykinin was observed. Concentrations of 2.5-10 pg/ml shifted PGE2 cumulative dose-response curves to the right in parallel with control curves, indicating competitive antagonism.
Antagonism of PGE2 and PGF2Q. by SC-19220 on the isolated
6 8 69 87 guinea-pig ileum * * , gerbil colon and rat stomach strips®® was observed at concentrations between 5x10”^ and
5xlO"®M. 29
NH — NH—R
(29)
(a) SC-19220 (d) SC-25038
R*=-COCH- R=-C0-(CH2)^CH3
(b) SC-18637 (e) SC-25324
-COCHgCgH^ -C0-(CH2)6CH3
(c) SC-25191 (f) SC-25192 -C0-(CH2)2CH3 -C0-CH(CH3>2
Dibenzoxazepine Derivatives
SC-19220 (5xlO~^ to 10”^M) has been found to inhibit
contractions induced by arachidonic acid, PGE2 and PGF2 q, on
88 89 isolated rat stomach strips * and rat gastric fundus 9 0 muscle • An inhibitory shift in the PGE2 —dose response
91 curve on the isolated sphincter pupillae muscle was
demonstrated with SC-19220 concentrations of 5x10 ^ - 10
Sanner 92 reported that SC-19220, administered
intraperitoneally to mice inhibited diarrhea produced by 30
intraperltoneal administration of PGE2 . When the compound
was suspended with the aid of 0 .1% or 1 % polysorbate 80, the
antidiarrheal potency was increased ten-fold (from an ED^q
of 170 mg/kg to 17 mg/kg). The polysorbate solution
produced no inhibition of diarrhea by Itself, and did not
affect the activity in vitro of the antagonist. 93 Perfusion of the rabbit ear with SC-19220 (3 pg/ml)
selectively reduced the algesic effect of bradykinin but not
that of AcCh. When PG biosynthesis was inhibited by
indomethacin, SC-19220 no longer reduced the bradykinin
effect. However, SC-19220 antagonized the pain-enhancing
action of additionally administered PGE^. It was concluded
that SC-19220 acts by antagonizing the pain-enhancing action
of endogenously released PGs.
SC-19220 (Ixio”^ to lxlO“^M) antagonized the inhibition
of epinephrine stimulated lipolysis by PGE2 in rat
epididymal fat pads*^'*^. SC-19220 had no effect in the
absence of PGE2 " However, Iliano and Cuatrecasas^^ found
that SC-19220 (35 pM) potentiated epinephrine-stimulated
lipolysis in the absence of PGE2 *
With increasing side chain length in dibenzoxazepine
derivatives (Compounds 2 ^ c^, ^ and e^) antiprostaglandin potency on the isolated guinea-pig ileum also increased, but the specificity decreased*^» Alkyl chain branching in the alpha position (29 f) caused a loss in both antiprostaglandin potency and specificity. Phenacetyl derivative SC-18637 31
(29 h ) was more potent against PGE2 on the isolated guinea-
pig ileum than was SC-19220, but SC-18637 was less specific against the PGs.
Polyphloretin phosphate (PPP; ^ ) , a polyanionic polyester of phloretin and phosphoric acid, was synthesized 98 by Diczfaluzy and associates' These polyesters are potent inhibitors of many enzymes including hyaluronidase, alkaline 9 9 phosphatase, and urease. Beitch and Eakins used PPP (10 mg/ml) to stabilize the blood-aqueous barrier in the rabbit eye in a study of the mechanism of intraocular action of PGs on intraocular pressure. They found that the PGs, under these conditions, no longer produced the characteristic increased permeability of the blood-aqueous barrier and did not raise intraocular pressure.
The first report that PPP (5-10 pg/ml) is a selective antagonist of certain smooth muscle actions of PGs came from
Eakins and Karim^^^ using the isolsted gerbil colon.
OH 0 II
T h
n
30 32
It has been reported that PPP exhibits a reversible
selective inhibition of the contractile responses produced
by both E- and F-type PGs on guinea-pig longitudinal and
circular colonic muscle^* (50-300 pg/ml), gerbil
colon^®®*^®^ (5-10 pg/ml), and rabbit jejunum^®^ (2.5-30
pg/ml). On the isolated gerbil colon, the actions of PGF2
were more readily antagonized by PPP (20 pg/ml) than those
of PGE2 * Contractions induced by ÂcChj bradykinin,
angiotensin and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) were not affected
102 by concentrations of PPP up to 20 uM • However, PPP
(2 0 - 1 0 0 pg/ml) was found to cause small dose-dependent
contractions of the rat fundus strip^^ and did not antagon
ize responses to PGE2 , PGF2 q- or AcCh.
Different molecular weight fractions of PPP were
separated by chromatography and assayed as PG antagonists
and hyaluronidase inhibitors. The PG antagonist activity
was found only in the low molecular weight fractions which
had little or no ability to inhibit hyaluronidase. The high molecular weight fractions possessed enzyme inhibitory
properties but were not PG-antagonists^^^ * • It has been
found that the most active moieties in PPP were monomers.
Di-4-phloretin phosphate (31), a synthetic compound, was
found to be approximately ten times as potent as PPP^^^« 33
0 II HO — P — 0 No
- ^ 2 31
Contractions induced by PGE2 and PGF2 Q, in isolated
human intestinal muscle preparations^^ and the small and
large intestine of the human fetus^^^ were selectively
antagonized by PPP at concentrations of 100-1,200 and 80-160 pg/ml, respectively. PPP (10-40 pg/ml) antagonized
contractions of the isolated human bronchi^^^lnduced by PGF 2 a ,
caused relaxation of the bronchi which may be related to antagonism of endogenous PGs and antagonized contractions induced by PGE2 in preparations of human umbilical ^ 108,109 arteries
PPP (2.5-30 pg/ml) inhibited contractions of the isolated rabbit uterus^^^* induced by PGEg and PGF2 # * but did not inhibit those produced by either AcCh or epinephrine. PPP (40-60 pg/ml) blocked spontaneous activity induced by PGF2 Q; on uterine strips^^^ taken from normal rats, although it did not affect spontaneous motility and contractions in preparations taken from ovarectomized 34
animals. PPP was found to completely inhibit contractions
induced by PGE^ and " ^ 2 0, » whereas contractions induced by
oxytocin were unaffected^^• Although PPP antagonized
uterine contractions induced by both PGs, it did not affect
the ability to raise c-AMP levels, suggesting that
interaction with adenylate cyclase is not a prerequiste for
the PGs to produce contractions in uterine smooth muscle.
PPP (100-200 mg/Kg; i.v.) was found to prevent the fall
in blood pressure produced by PGF2a , but not that produced
by either PGE2 or AcCh. In the anaesthetised
PPP (200 mg/Kg; i.v.) produced an initial, transient
stimulation of intestinal motility and a fall in blood
pressure. PPP blocked all the effects of PGF2# measured,
namely, an increase in airway pressure, stimulation of
intestinal motility and a fall in blood pressure. However,
PPP only inhibited the effects of PGE2 on intestinal
motility; it did not inhibit the fall in blood or airway
pressure. Therefore, PPP only antagonized some of the PG
actions studied, and in addition enhanced the effects of
PGE2 on intestinal motility prior to blockade^^^» In 17
rats, no fall in blood pressure was seen using up to 640 mg/Kg i.v., and this indicated species differences in
responses to PPP^^^* In five dogs, PPP (lOOmg/Kg; i.v.)
reversed the pressor effect of PGF2 Q, affording a prolonged 113 depressor response • As before, the depressor action of
PGE2 was not inhibited, but was enhanced. 35
Diarrhea produced in mice by intraperitoneal injections
of PGE2 ^was inhibited by PPP (50-200 mg/Kg; i.v.) given
15 min prior to P G . In man, PPP (2 g; orally) did not
prevent diarrhea produced by PGE2 or PGF2q;^ ^ ^ ^ • However,
large doses (4 g) were found to induce diarrhea.
PPP (1.3 pM) was found to be a potent competitive
inhibitor of the PG binding site on PGDH prepared from swine O 1 lung • PPP inhibited pulmonary metabolism of PGs in
isolated perfused guinea-pig lungs^^^, exhibiting an ID^^ of
2.15 and 1.55 pg/ml against PGE2 and PGF2 metabolism^
respectively. At these low concentrations of PPP, no
antagonism of the effects of PGs were seen. PPP (40 mg/Kg;
i.v.) protected guinea-pigs against anaphylactic convulsions
following exposure to antigen aerosols and partially against
convulsions produced by histamine, but it was ineffective against those induced by carbachol^^^ •
PPP (5 pg/ml) inhibited PGE2 and TSH stimulation of adenylate cyclase on isolated bovine thyroid cells, but did not alter basal adenylate cyclase activity in these experiments^^» PPP (5 mg/ml) inhibited PGE^ and LH — stimulated lactic acid production in prepubertal rat 118 ovaries and reversed PGE^ inhibition of osmotic water flow in toad bladders^* at a concentration of 40 pg/ml.
Studies by Kuehl and coworkers^^^ using PPP, indicated that this polymer ( 2 0 0 pg/ml) had no effect upon
PGE^-stimulated c-AMP formation in mouse or rabbit 36
myometrium. Rather, PPP was found to act at a site
subsequent to c-AMP formation. This site was identified as
the c-AMP dependent protein kinase. Therefore, PPP is
considered not to be a true PG antagonist in these tissues
since it does not block the primary PGEj^ event. It has been
shown that phloretin (50 pg/ml) itself antagonized PGE^
stimulation of c-AMP in mouse ovaries^^* These results
suggested that direct PG antagonism by PPP may be related to
the differential abilities of tissues to enzymatically
dephosphorylate the compound to the parent phosphate-free
analogue. Therefore, it appears that the effects of PPP
could be due to direct PG antagonism, inhibition of c-AMP
dependent protein kinase and/or inhibition of PGDH.
Sodium p-benzyl-4— {l-oxo-2-(4-chlorobenzy1)-3-phenyl-
propyl} phenylphosphonate (N-0164; 2&) was found to inhibit
PGE2 ~ and PGF2 Q; -induced contractions on isolated
preparations^^^ of gerbil colon (1-3.8 xlO”^M ) , rat stomach
strips and guinea-pig gastrointestinal muscle
(0.19-3.8xlO”^M). The antagonistic effect on rat stomach
strip preparations to PGE2 and PGF2 a hy N-0164 was shown to
be competitive. The antagonism was reversible and the
dose-response curves in the presence of antagonist were parallel to those obtained in the absence of antagonist.
N-0164 (55 mg/Kg; i.p.) prevented diarrhea induced by
PGE2 in mice. However, N-0164 was less effective orally
(105 mg/Kg). N-0164 (1%) also prevented chemically-induced
irritation (croton oil and pyridine-ether) in the mouse ear. 37
C « , ON q '— ' Q
32
Recently, Allan and Levi^^^ reported that N-0164 (10
and 1 0 0 ng/ml) was found to selectively antagonize the
vasoconstrictor effects of PGF2 # and PGD2 on the coronary
vasculature of the isolated guinea-pig heart. At higher
concentrations (1.0 pg/ml), N-0164 antagonized the coronary vasodilator actions of PGE2 ; however, it did not modify the
coronary vasodilator action of prostacyclin. N-0164 (10-100 ng/ml) also antagonized sinus rate changes produced by either PGD2 or PGF2Q, , whereas at high concentrations (1 pg/ ml) this compound potentiated sinus rate increases produced by either PGE2 or prostacyclin.
Later, N-0164 (20-100 pM) was found to reverse PGE2 inhibition of isoproterenol-induced c-AMP accumulations in
12 2 rat uterus • N-0164, at the same concentration, was a potent c-AMP phosphodiestrase inhibitor in broken cell preparations and potentiated the c-AMP response to 38
isoproterenol in intact tissues. N-0164 produced similar
proportional increases in the c-AMP response to
isoproterenol in the presence and absence of PGE2 « The
authors suggested that the apparent reversal by N-0164 of
the PGE2 effect on the c-AMP response to isoproterenol is
not due to its PG antagonistic action, but to inhibition of
c-AMP phosphodiesterase. N-0164 (4 pM) selectively
inhibited the PGE2 "lnduced contraction of the rat uterusj
while at higher concentrations it also antagonized
carbachol-induced contractions. Therefore, N-0164 has at
least two effects in the rat uterus; PG antagonism and c-AMP
phosphodiestrase inhibition.
It has been found that morphine (0.01 pg/ml) partially 123 inhibited contractions of Isolated guinea-pig ileum
induced by darmstoff, which was later shown to be a mixture
of PGs. Jaques^^^ showed that morphine and the related
substances, etonitazene (0.23 ng/ml) and nalorphine (0.014 pg/ml) are potent inhibitors of contractions induced by PGE^
on the islated guinea-pig ileum.
Sodium meclofenamate (3^) and sodium flufenamate (34)
at concentrations of 20 pg/ml were found to inhibit
contractions induced by histamine, SRS-A, and PGF2 ^ on human 12 5 bronchial muscle in vitro • Resting tone also was decreased. The vasodepressor response of PGF^^ was selectively blocked by intravenous infusion of meclofenamate
12 6 (30 mg/Kg) into rabbits • Recently, sodium meclofenamate 39
(1 pg/ml) was reported to reduce contractions induced by 90 PGE2 » PCI 2 on the isolated rat gastric fundus
COzNa Cl C O ^ N q o o
a C H ^
(33) (34)
Sodium meclofenamate Sodium flufenamate
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory compounds such as
aspirin (100 and 300 pg/ml) and phenylbutazone (1 and 10
pg/ml) inhibited contractions induced by PGF2 D: the 125 Isolated human bronchial muscle • Indomethacin (10—60
pg/ml) was found to antagonize contractions induced by 5-HT,
bradykinin and PGE2 on the isolated rat uterus and guinea- 1 27 pig ileum • This PG-biosynthetlc blocker was about four
times more potent against PGE2 « On the isolated rat gastric
fundus^^» indomethacin (1 pg/ml) was found to reduce the contractions induced by PGD2 , PGI2 or PGH2 analogues more
than those induced by AcCh.
Patulin (2: ) was reported to block the effects of irin, later shown to be a mixture of PGs, on the isolated hamster 128 colon Patulin was found to be a nonspecific 40 12 9 antagonist since it inhibited contractions produced on
the isolated guinea-pig ileum by histamine, pilocarpine,
5-HT and AcCh.
(35)
Fatulin
Ethanol (500 ml of 10% solution; i.v.) vas found to
130 inhibit uterine motility in pregnant women only when contractions were induced by PGEj^ and PGF2 # , and not when induced by oxytocin. Also, intracarotid infusion of ethanol^^^ (0.08-0.5%) resulted in inhibition of cerebral vasoconstriction produced by PCE^ and PGF 2Q; in dogs or monkeys .
The inhibition of PG biosynthesis by clidanac^^^
(6-chloro-5-cyclohexyl-l-indancarboxylic acid, TAI-284; 36), 41
Its metabolites and some analogues was assessed using 132 various microsomal preparations as an enzyme source.
Clidanac was found to be a very potent inhibitor of PG 133 - synthetase activity , wherein the (+)-lsomer was shown to
be 1000 times more potent than the (-)-isomer.
CO2H
(36)
Clidanac 134 Experiments on rat fundus smooth muscle preparations revealed that verapamil (5-10 pg), a known Ca^^ antagonist, acts as a PG antagonist. This may explain its ability to act as an antiarrythmic agent, in which PGs are believed to be involved.
A analogue (37) with N,N-dimethylamino substitution on C-1^^^ was found to be a potent, specific
PGF zq antagonist with no agonist activity in either the ■1 O £ gerbil colon (3.2 pg/ml) or the isolated canine lobe 137 preparation (3.2 pg/ml). Intravenous infusion (75 or 150 fig/ml) of 2Z. using anesthetized male Wistar rats^^® was shown to shift the dose-response curves for PGF 2 % -induced 42
pulmonary and systemic vascular effects to the right in a
dose-dependent manner. This analogue exhibited no
significant effect on the pulmonary or systemic vascular
responses to norepinephrine or the pulmonary vascular
responses to arachidonic acid. Therefore, the N,N-dimethyl
analogue of PGF 2a selectively antagonized the pulmonary and
systemic responses to PGF2a in the intact rat in a dose-
dependent fashion.
OH CH. CM
OH OH
37
There are several other substances which have been
found to inhibit one or more actions of the PGs. These 139 include reserpine on the isolated guinea-pig colon >
isoproterenol(l.5xlO~^ umoles) on the rabbit eye^^°, norepinephrine (lxlO~^ g/ml) on the isolated rat stomach^^l,
estradiol on luteolysis^*^, valinomycin (10"^M) on the
release of growth hormone^^^, progesterone (10 mg; s.c.) on rabbit uterine contractions^^^, and emetine (5-15 pg) on the
isolated rat fundus smooth muscle^^^. 43
Unfortunately, known PG antagonists are not potent when
compared to the therapeutically useful antagonists such as
anticholinergics and antihistamines. Little is known about
their therapeutic usefulness. They have been used as
pharmacological tools to further define the actions of
endogenous PGs.
Several possibilities have been suggested for the
therapeutic applicatin of PG antagonists. PGs are thought
to be involved during labor as a natural uterine
stimulant^**" Thus, PG antagonists could be helpful in preventing habitual abortion or premature labor^^^’ .
Aspirin (200 mg/Kg/day) and indomethacin (2 mg/Kg/day) were
found to block PG synthesis in the uterus, reduce motility and prolong parturition in rats^^^*^^^* These drugs also prolonged mid-trimester saline abortions in humans^^^*
None of the primary PG antagonists (7-OPyA, SC-19220 or
PPP) were found to inhibit relaxation of circular gastrointestinal muscle which is induced by PGE2 * Also, none of the antagonists inhibited all the actions of the
PGs. In this dissertation we describe a new approach to PG antagonist development and the pharmacological results obtained. The rationale is based upon a retrospective analysis of the construction of antihistamines and anticholinergic drugs. Chapter IV
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: A RATIONAL APPROACH TO THE DESIGN OF PG ANTAGONISTS.
To formulate the basis for development of a PG
antagonist a retrospective analysis of the development of
cholinergic blocking agents and H-1 antihistamines is
described. Arguments presented for the development of
antihistamines work equally well for the retrospective
development of a cholinergic blocking agent and thus the
histamlne-antihistamine case is only presented here.
H-1 receptor antihistamines have an aliphatic tertiary
amino group, which is proposed to interact with an anionic
site as does the aliphatic primary amino group of histamine^^^• The tertiary amino group in the antihistamine gains significance because of its longer half-life in vivo.
A primary amine would readily undergo oxidatlve-deamination
rendering the compound inactive. To mimic the size of the
tertiary amine as close as possible to that of the primary amine, small alkyl functions provide antihistamines with higher pA£ values. Larger groups bonded to nitrogen afford considerably less selectivity for the histamine receptors and in the case of prenylamine render a classic antihistamine structure the properties of a Ca antagonist.
- 44 - 45
^ N H 2
Histamine (38)
Antihistamine (39)
?, % — C — 0 — C H 2 — C H 2 — N — M e A^e
Acetylcholine (40) O Me
CH-. Me
Anticholinergic (41)
In addition to an electron-rich nitrogen which would be protonated and H 2 O soluble at physiological pH, an antihistamine requires two aryl groups bonded to some function X which replace the imidazole ring of histamine and provides for increased affinity with loss of intrinsic 46
activity. Similarly, replacement of two hydrogen atoms on
the acetyl methyl group of AcCh by aryl functions converts
the agonist into a cholinergic blocking drug.
Therefore, we propose that PG antagonists might be
constructed having an aliphatic carboxyl group of
appropriate pKa rendering the compound anionic and H 2 O
soluble at physiological pH and capable of interaction with
a pharmacological cationic receptor. Aryl funtionality
bonded to groups having a juxtaposition related to the
cyclopentandiol moiety of PGF2Q; when drawn in the "hairpin"
conformation could, if distances were correct for receptor
site binding, provide increased affinity with loss of
intrinsic activity.
Indeed, conformational analysis of PGs by single
crystal X-ray diffraction techniques^^^ indicated that
active PGs adopt a "hairpin" conformation wherein the ce and w
chains aligned roughly parallel. NMR spectral
studies^^®*in aqueous t-BuOH also suggested the "hair
pin" conformation to be important in biologically active
PGs. However, PGF 2Q has little affinity for PGE2 receptors
and the reverse is also true^^^* Possible differences in
receptor affinity may be related to conformational
differences in solution even though these two analogues
differ only in oxidation state at C (9).
Of all the PGs studied by diffraction techniques, only
PGBj^ does not exist in a "hairpin" conformation. PGA^ as 47
well 35 other "hairpin-shaped" PGs are substrates for PGDH
while PGBj is not^^^- PGBj^ was found to exist preferential
ly in an "L-shaped" conformation. It would appear that PGDH
only metabolizes "hairpin-shaped" PGs • Possibly, the L-
shape of PGBj may physically prevent PGB^ from binding to
the PG site on PGDH or PGB^ may bind to the site but not be metabolized. No experiments have been carried out to differentiate these possibilities.
The Hairpin Conformation of PGF 2 q-
The L-Shaped Conformation of PGB^
Figure. 5 48
Normally, removal of one aryl group in an
antihistamine, wherein potent antagonists always have two
such functions, renders the compound considerably less
actlve^^^'^^^" Thus, the pAg value may drop from 8 to 5.
When this is done, stereoselectivity is observed when the
asymmetric carbon is bonded to the amino N of the molecule,
a phenomenon not observed for the more potent dlaryl
substituted antihistamines. In the latter case, difference
in enantiomeric potency are only observed when the
asymmetric center is CX to the dimethylamino function. These
data suggest that the more potent antihistamines containing
two aromatic rings bond outside the histamine receptor to
regions having little enantiomeric selectivity. The less
potent mono aryl antihistamines may reflect asymmetry of the
histamine receptor per se.
Following this analogy it might be anticipated that di aryl substituted antiprostaglandins would have greater potency when compared to monoaryl analogues, but research is required to elucidate the intricicies of such bonding and the influence of enantioselectivity on both affinity and PG receptor selectivity. In view of the apparent interconversion of PG receptors^^^ the ultimate answer to the development of a selective analogues must result from assessment of a variety of compounds in many pharmacological systems. For these reasons we have extended our studies to include the monoaryl as well as diaryl analogues. 49
OH CO2H
OH
(5)
CO 2 H
(42)
CO2H
(1^) R= R'= 0
(43) R= R'= OH 50
A therapeutically useful antagonist should be
constructed using facile synthetic methodology and in good
yields. For these reasons, we have employed the bicyclic
indanone and indanol structure which mimics carbons 4-8 and
12-16 in PGF2q, • Furthermore, the high electron density at
position 6,13 and 14 have a juxtaposition similar to the
appropriate tt cloud of the aromatic ring in the indanone
structure. Furthermore, it is known that the ISO!-hydroxyl 162 group of PGF20! is required for intrinsic activity
Oxidation to the ketone decreases such potency. In
proposing a PG antagonist, the indane hydroxyl group or the
carbonyl in its indanone counterpart have a juxtaposition to
the 15 Ct-hydroxyl group of PGF2Q: relative to the carboxyl
function like a 15Cü-hydroxyl or a carbonyl group of PGF2 q;»
Bonding of the flexible n-Bu or other alkyl groups to the
2-position of the indane ring as well as thep-carboxyethyl function provide both the necessary lipophilicity and flexibility to accomodate a receptor interaction. Thus, this first approximation to antagonist design does not require the absolute fit of a completely rigid molecule.
The two phenolic hydroxyl groups at positions 5 and 6 of the indanone structure mimic C-9 and C-11 of PGF2 q; and serve for bonding aryl functionality in the form of benzyl groups at the appropriate distance from the carboxyl function. The benzyl groups afford a flexibility allowing for bonding to a number of possible sites outside the immediate vicinity of a 51 hypothetical PG receptor. In our PG antagonist structure, we have deleted C-10 of PGF2 # and have rendered C-4 and C-16 a single C at position 2 of the indanone.
CO 2 H
0
R= Et (44)
R= n-Pr (45)
R= n-Bu (46)
R= n-Pen (4 7 )
R= CH2 CH 2 CO 2H (48)
■0 CO 2
OH
R= Et (49)
R= n-Pr (50)
R= n-Bu (51)
R= n-Pen (52) Chapter V
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The syntheses for targets 44-52 are found in Schemes I
and II.
Cyclization of 3-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid (53)
prepared^** from m-hydroxyhenzaldehyde and malonic acid
followed by catalytic hydrogenation of the resulting
cinnamic acid, was accomplished using AlClg (NaCl)/180-200°C
in a procedure described by Bruce and coworkers^• Steam
distillation^** of the mixture provided non-volatile
5-hydroxy-l-indanone (5_4) in 85% yield- Indanone 5 ^ was
isolated from the distillate in 15% yield. Treatment of
with K 2 C0 2 /abs.EtOH/CgH3 CH2 Cl afforded intermediate,
5-benzyloxy-l-indanone (5^) in 87.5% yield. Condensation of
56 with dimethyl carbonate in the presence of NaH afforded
carbomethoxy analogue 5 7 _ in 95% yield.
Previous attempts to prepare 2-alkyl substituted
indanone from 2Z. via the enamine failed owing to poor
enamine yields^. Alkylation of 5_7 using Na/n-alkyl halide
or NaOEt/n-alky 1 halide in EtOH also only afforded poor
yields (5%) of the alkyl derivative^- However, use of NaH/
n-alkyl bromide in freshly distilled THF containing hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA) afforded 58-61 in 68-82%
- 52 - 53 yield. Hydrolysis and subsequent decarboxylation in acetic acid: cone HCl: H 2 O (2.5: 1: 1) afforded indanones 62-65 in
65-78% yield.
a Scheme I.
HO
OOH +
II OH
COOMe MeO-C-OMe
IL NaH R-Br HÏ1PA
PhCH,0
‘COOMe HOAc
0 62-65
COOMe
0 66-69 R= Et, n-Pr, n-Bu, n-Pen 54
Anion formation using t-BuOK in t-BuOH followed by Michael
addition to methyl acrylate yielded indanone esters 66-69
following chromotography on silicic acid using
toluene : chloroform : ethyl acetate (75:20:5). Alkaline ester
hydrolysis afforded keto acids 44-47 in 60-70% overall yield
from 62-65.
Reduction of the intermediate ester 6^ with NaBH^ in
MeOH, however, did not afford the desired epimeric indanols
7 0 , but rather two tricyclic compounds 71_ (30%) and 7_2 (50%)
which were separated by chromatography on silica gel using
CHCl3 :i-PrOH (96:4) as eluting solvent. The indane C-1
proton resonance signals for T l _ ( 6 5.38) and 7^ ( 6 4.54)
were particularly diagnostic. For 7 2, the additional two
proton resonance signal multiplets (X) bonded to the C a to
1 5 oxygen appeared at 6 3.5-3.7. The { C}-carbonyl resonance 13 signal for 7^ appeared at 172.4 ppm and the equivalent { C}
signal for 7 2 appeared at 63.5 ppm. As expected, the resonance signal chemical shifts for 21. and 7_2 were identical (70.36 ppm). o C O ^ H
(70) 55
Alternatively, reduction of the corresponding keto acid anlons^^® (Na salts of 44-47 ) using NaBH^, E 2O for 4-6 days at room temperature afforded predominantly the respective trans-hydroxy acids (49-52) in 80-95% yield. For
49, lactone 22 likely arising from cyclization of cis- hydroxy acid also was isolated in 15% yield. The indane C-1 proton resonance signal for the trans-hydroxy acids (49-52 ) appeared at 5 4.72-4.75, whereas the equivalent signal in lactone 7_3 again appeared downfield ( 6 5 .39). Comparison of 13 the { C}-C-l resonance signal for ketone 4_^ (208.42 ppm) and alcohol 51 (78.97) confirmed structural assignments.
X= 0, R= n-Bu (71)
X= H 2 » n-Bu (72)
X= 0, R= Et (73) 56
Comparative stereoselective reduction of keto ester 68
with NaBH^-MeOH affording cis-lac tones and ethers ( J J l and
72 ) with reduction of keto acids (44-47 ) using
NaBH^/NaOH/H2 Û affording trans-hydroxy acids (49-52)
deserves comment . For ester NaBH^ reduction is sensitive
to steric approach control^^^’ in MeOH. Solvation of the
carbomethoxy group of 6^ by MeOH provides for increased
steric bulk over the n-Bu group directing hydride attack on
the carbonyl carbon from the n-Bu side. Rationales involving electrostatic shielding^in the case of borohydride reduction of anions are excluded since such rationales should predict stereoselective attack from the side opposite the anion. House and coworkers^^^* assumed that the geometry of the transition state and final product are similar and adequate to predict the major stereochemical course of borohydride reductions providing that the molecule is not conformationally constra ned such that attack is prevented from one side of the carbonyl. However, the high degree of stereoselectivity observed for reduction of 44-4 7 and the opposite stereochemical outcome when compared to reduction of 68 suggests to us that assisted hydride transfer via intramolecular solvation of the borohydride ion^^^ 1s important. Since the magnitude of the non-bonded interaction between the formed hydroxy moiety and cis-alky1 or cis-propionate group is expected to be similar, invoking 169,171 concepts of product development control seems not to be appropriate. 57
5-Benzyloxy-l-lndanone (5^) served as starting material
for preparation of dicarboxylic acid via ester 7_4. Anion
formation followed by Michael addition to methyl acrylate
and alkaline hydrolysis afforded 4^ in 60% overall yield.
Reduction of 4_8 using one molar equivalent of NaBH^ and NaOH
afforded lactone 7_5 in 90% yield. The indane C-1 proton
resonance signal at g 5.4 was consistent with the signal
observed for C-l-H in 7^ and 7 3.
a Scheme II.
0 0 ^ 7± R = R = CH2CH2C02h4e 46 R= R = CH2CH2 CO2 R
a a= t-BuOK, t-BuOH, r.t.; b= CH2®CHC02Me, r.t.; c= NaOH, H 2 O,
MeOH; d, NaBH^, NaOH, B^O, r.t., 4 days. Chapter VI
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Melting points were determined on a Thomas Hoover apparatus and are uncorrected. { H-} and { C-} NMR spectra were obtained using Bruker 90 and 80 MHz Instruments, respectively. Infrared spectra were recorded using a Beckman IR 4230 spectrometer. Mass spectra were determined using a Du Pont 491 Instrument. Elemental analyses were obtained from Galbraith Laboratories Inc., Knoxville, TN.
5-Hydroxy-l-ldanone(54). A mixture of anhydrous AlClg
(10.0 g; 0.073 mol) and NaCl (2.0 g; 0.05 mol) was melted In
a beaker by direct beating over a flame while stirring with
a glass rod. 3-Hydroxypbenylproplonlc acld^^* (5^ ; 2.0 g;
0.012 mol) was added at 140°C. The melt temperature rapidly
Increased to 1 8 0 °C and was maintained at 180-200°C for 2
mln. The residue was steam distilled and
7-hydroxy-l-lndanone (5_5) crystallized from the distillate.
5-Hydroxy-l-lndanone ( 5_4 ) remained In the flask and was
filtered. Recrystalllzatlon from MeOH afforded yellow
needles, mp 181—183°C (llt.^^^ mp 184—184.5°C).
5-Benzyloxy-l-lndanone(56). To a mixture of
5-hydroxy-l-lndanone (5^ ; 3.25 g; 0.022mol), and anhydrous
K 2 CO 3 (3.4 g; 0.022 mol) In absolute EtOH (100 mL) benzyl
chloride (3.0 g; 0.022 mol) was added dropwlse with stirring
- 58- 59
under N 2 • The mixture was refluxed over night, filtered and
washed with EtOH. The combined filtrates were concentrated under reduced pressure affording a yellow residue which upon
recrystallization from EtOH afforded 4.9 g (87.5%) of color
less crystals mp 105—106°C (lit.^^^ mp 105.5—106°C).
5-Benzyloxy-2 - carbomethoxy-l-indanone(57 ) . To a slurry of NaH (1.2 g; 0.05 mol; 50% emulsion) in dimethyl carbonate
(10 mL) was added with stirring under Ng a solution of
5-benzyloxy-l-indanone ( ^ 6 ; 4.76 g; 0.02mol) in dimethyl carbonate (70 mL) . The mixture was refluxed for 3 h, after which time the excess NaH was decomposed by dropwise addition of ice cold H 2 O followed by acidification with glacial HOAc. The solution was extracted with Et 2 Û and the
Et20 layer was washed, dried (Na2 S0 ^), filtered and cone. under reduced pressure affording a yellow solid. Recrystal lization from MeOH afforded 5.6 g (95%) of light yellow crystals mp 1 0 2 - 1 0 3 °C; IR (KBr) 1740, 1710 cm"^; {^H-} NMR
(CDClg) 6 6.80-7.70 (m, 8 H, aromatic), 5.1 (s, 2H, benzylic),
3.75 (s, 3H, - C O 2 CH 3 ), 3 .2-3 .8 (m, 3H, ABC pattern of 2H-3 and H—2) .
A n a l . Calcd for Cj^gHji^O^: C, 72.96; H, 5.44. Found:
C, 73.02; H, 5.45.
5-Benzyloxy-2n-butyl-2-carbornetboxy-1-indanone(60) .
To a slurry of NaH (1.2 g; 0.05 mol; 50% emulsion) in 10 mL 60
of THF (freshly distilled from LAIH^) was added with
stirring under N 2 a solution of 5-benzyloxy-2-carbomethoxy-
1-indanone (5_^ ; 5.92 g; 0.02 mol) in THF (60 mL) . The mixture was heated at 60-70°C for 15 min and n— butyl bromide
(3.01 g; 0.022 mol) was added. The mixture was refluxed for
5 h, cooled and 15 mL of HMPA (highly carcinogenic) was added. The clear solution was stirred at room temperature
for 1 h and refluxed overnight. Following concentration under reduced pressure, H 2 O was added and the mixture extracted several times with Et 2 0 . The organic layer was dried (Na2 S0 ^), filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure affording 5.81 g (82.5%) of colorless crystals mp
8 6 -8 8 °C (benzene/pet.ether). IR (KBr) 1750,1710 cm ^ ; {^H-}
NMR (CDCI3 ) 56.8-7.8 ( m, 8H, aromatic), 5.1 (s, 2H, benzyl ic), 3.6 (s, 3H, -CO2 CH3 ), 0.7-2.1 (m, 9H, aliphatic).
Calcd. for the AB part (benzylic) 5 ^ 3.68, 5 g 3.04 with
= 17.48 H z .
Anal. Calcd for C2 2 H 2 4 O 4 ! C , 74.97; H, 6 .8 6 . Found:
C, 74.88; H, 6.91.
5-Benzyloxy-2n-butyl-l-lndanone(64). To a solution of
5-benzyloxy-2n-butyl-2-carbomethoxy-l-indanone (6^ ; 1.72 g;
0.005 mol) in glacial HOAc (10 mL) was added 10 mL of d il
HCl solution. The mixture was refluxed for 5 h, stirred overnight at room temperature, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in Et 20 and 61
washed with H 2 O and saturated NaCl solution, dried (Nag^SO^),
filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure affording
1.05 g of solid. Debenzylated product was separated by
chromatography on silicic acid using toluene: CHCI3 ; EtOAc
(75: 25: 5) as the eluting solvent. Benzylated indanone 6^
eluted first and following solvent removal under reduced
pressure was recrystallized from MeOH affording 1.07 g (73%)
of colorless crystals mp 6 6 - 6 8 °C. IR (KBr) 1710 cm ^ ; {^H-}
NMR (CDCI3 ) 6 6.8-7.74 (m, 8H, aromatic), 5.1 (s, 2Hj
benzylic), 2.5-3.2 (m, 3H, ABC pattern of 2H-3 and H-2 ) j
0.81-1.6 (m, 9H, aliphatic).
A n a l . Calcd for 020^22^2" 81.59; H, 7.53. Found;
C, 81.42; H, 7.60.
The debenzylated product, 2n-butyl-5-hydroxy-l—indanone
{0.19 g(12%; MeOH)} exhibited mp 134-136°C. {^H-} NMR
(DMSO-dg) 5 6.6-7.55 (m, 3H, aromatic), 2.3-3.4 (m, 3H, ABC
pattern of 2H-3 and H-2), 0.8-1.55 (m, 9H, aliphatic).
Anal. Calcd for Cj^3 Hj^g0 2 î C , 76.44; H, 7.89. Found:
C, 76.51; H, 7.90.
Methyl 5-Benzyloxy-2n-butyl-l-oxo-2-indanpropionate(68)
and Its Free Acid(46 ) . To a solution of 5-benzyloxy-
2n-butyl-l-indanone (64 ; 2.94 g; 0.01 mol) in t-BuOH (25 mL) was added t-BuOK (0.44 g; 0.004 mol). The mixture was
stirred at room temperature under N2 for 5 h. Methyl 62
acrylate (1.72 g; 0.02 mol) was added and the mixture was
stirred at room temperature overnight, acidified with
glacial HOAc, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The
solid was dissolved in £t 2 Û, washed twice with 1 0 % N a 2 C0 g
solution, dried (Na2 S0 ^) filtered and concentrated under
reduced pressure. The residue was chromatographed on
silicic acid using toluene; CEClg: EtOAc (75: 25: 5) as
eluting solvent. The resulting colorless oil obtained
following solvent removal was hydrolysed using 15% methanol-
ic KOH reflux for 2 h) thereby affording a yellow semi-solid
which was recrystallized from benzene/hexane yielding 2.7 g
(74%) of 46 as white crystals mp 76-78^C. IR (KBr) 1740,
1715 cm"^; NMR (CDCl^) £10.22 (s, IE, COgE), 6.72-7.8
(m, BE, aromatic), 5.12 (s, 2E, benzylic), 0.62-2.4 (m, 13E, aliphatic). Calcd for the AB part (benzylic) £ ^ 3.05, £g
2.84 with J^B *= 17.59 Ez; MS (70 eV), m/e 3 6 6 (m '*');
NMR (CDCI3 ) 208.43 (C=0), 178.48 (CO2H).
A n a l . Calcd for C2 3 H 2 6 O 4 : C, 75.38; H, 7.15. Found:
C, 75.23; E, 7.26.
Sodium Borohydride Reduction of Methyl 5-Benzyloxy-2n- butyl-1-0 X 0 - 2 — indanpropionate(6 8 ). To a solution of methyl
5-benzyloxy-2n-butyl-l-oxo-2-indanpropionate ( 68 ; 1.9 g;
0.005 mol) in MeOH (20 mL) was added with stirring NaBH^
(0.189 g; 0.005 mol) in E 2 O (10 mL). The mixture was stirred for 20 h at room temperature and 10 mL of 1 N NaOH 63
solution was added. The MeOH was removed under reduced
pressure and to the resulting semi-solid was added cone HCl:
H 2O (1:1). The aqueous mixture was extracted with Et 20 and
the organic layer was dried (Na2 S0 ^), filtered and
concentrated under reduced pressure affording an oil (1 . 5 3
g) which was chromatographed on silica gel {CHCI3 :i-PrOH
(96:4)}.
(A)(cis)-5-Benzyloxy-2 n-buty1-1-hydroxy-2-indanpropionic
Acid, S-Lactone(71) 0.52g(30%) was obtained as colorless
crystals mp 1 1 1 -1 1 3 °C following solvent removal under
reduced pressure and recrystallization from
CHCI3 /benzene/hexane. IR (KBr) 1730 cm ^ ; {^H-} NMR (0001^)6
6.78-7.44 (m, 8H, aromatic), 5.38 (s, IH, C-1 H), 5.05 (s,
2H, benzylic), 0.8-2.49 (m, 13H, aliphatic). Calcd for the
AB part (benzylic) {Bruker 300 MHz instrument} 6 ^ 2.97, 6 g
2.88 with = 16.68 Hz; MS (70 eV)m/e, 350(M*); {^^C-} NMR
(CDCI3 ) 172.41 (C=0), 70.36 (C-1 ato 0).
Anal. Calcd for C 2 3 H 2 5 O 3 : C, 78.83; H, 7.48. Found:
C, 79.09; H, 7.70.
(^)(cis)-7-Benzyloxy-4a-n-buty1-2,3,4,4a,5,9b-hexahydro- indeno-{l,2-b}pyran(72) 0.85g(50%) was obtained as colorless crystals mp 9 4 - 9 5 °C following solvent removal under reduced pressure and recrystallization from benzene/CH30K . {^H-}
NMR(CDCl3 ) 66.8-7.44 (m, 8 H, aromatic), 5.04 (s, 2H, 64
benzylic), 4.54 (s, IH, C-1 H), 3.49-3. 69 (m, 2H, -O-CH2 ),
0.87-1.68 (m, IIH, aliphatic). Calcd. for the AB
part( benzylic) 2.74, g g 2.65 with Jy^g = 15.56 Hz; MS (70
eV); m/e 336(M*); {^^C-} NMR (CDCI3 ) 70.36 (C-1 a to 0);
63.52 (-O-CH2 ).
Anal. Calcd for C2 3 H 2 7 O 2 : C,82.22; H, 8.1. Found: C,
82.33 ; H, 8.4.
(trans)-5-Benzyloxy-2n-buty1-1-hydroxy-2-indanpropioni c
Acid(51). A solution of 5-benzyloxy-2n-butyl-l-oxo-
2-indanpropionic acid ( ^ ; 1.1 g; 0.003 mol) in H^O (15 mL)
containing NaOH (0.12 g; 0.003 mol) was added to NaBH^
(0.114 g; 0.003 mol) in 0.2 N NaOH (1 mL). The mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 4 days, slowly acidified
with dil HCl solution and extracted with Et 2 0 . The Et 20
layer was extracted with 10% aqueous NaHCOg solution. The
aqueous layer was acidified with dil HCl solution and
extracted with Et 2 0 . The E t 20 solution was dried (Na2 S0 ^),
filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure.
Recrystallization of the residue from EtOAc/benzene/hexane
afforded 0.92 g (85%) of white crystals mp 145-147°C. IR
(KBr) 3400, 1685 cm'^; {^H-} NMR (CDCl^) Ô 6.77-7.45 (m, 8H,
aromatic), 5.03 (s, 2H, benzylic), 4.72 (s, IH, C-1 H), 2.63
(s, IH, -CO2 H), 0.84-2.46 (m, 13H, aliphatic). Calcd for
the AB part (benzylic) 6 y^ 2.95, 2.43 with Jy^g = 15.89 Hz;
MS (70 eV), m/e 368(M*); {^^C-} NMR (DMSO-dg) 184.24
(-CO2 H), 78.8 (C-1 OH). 65
Ana1. Calcd for 74 . 96 ; H, 7.65. Found:
C, 74.65; H, 7.53.
5-Ben2 yloxy-l-0 X 0 - 2 ,2-lndandlpropionlc Acid (48).
5-Benzyloxy-l-indanone (5^ ; 2.38 g; 0.01 mol) was treated
with t-BuOK (0.56 g; 0.005 mol) in t-BuOH (20 mL) under N 2
with stirring. Methyl acrylate (1.72 g; 0.02 mol) was added
and stirring continued overnight. The mixture was acidified
with glacial HOAc, concentrated under reduced pressure and
diluted with Et 2 0 . The organic layer was washed with H 2 O,
dried (Na2 S0 ^) and conc. under reduced pressure affording a
viscous oil (2.3 g) of dimethyl ester 7_4 which was not
further purified, but hydrolysed to diacid 48 using a 10%
NaOH solution (Me0H:H 2 0 ; 2:8). Diacid was recrystallized
from HeOH/benzene/hexane affording 2.2 g (60%) of colorless
crystals mp 144-145°C. IR (KBr) 3400, 1730, 1700 cm ^ ;
NMR (CDClg) 5 6.93-7.79 (m, 8H, aromatic), 5.14 (s, 2H,
benzylic), 2.94 (s, 2H, benzylic), 1.96-2.3 (m, 8H,
aliphatic); MS (70 eV), m/e 382(N^)-
Anal. Calcd for ^ 22^ 22^ 6 ’ C,69.09; H, 5.80. Found:
C, 69.08; H, 6.01.
(trans)-5-Benzyloxy-l-hydroxy-2 ,2-indandipropionic
Acid, 5 Lactone(75). Using conditions virtually identical to
those employed in the reduction of keto acid 4^, afforded
5-lactone 7_5 mp 1 7 5 -1 7 6 °C ( CHCl^/benzene/hexane) in 90% 66 yield. IR (KBr) 3400, 1740, 1700 cm"^; NMR (CDCl^yS
6.8-7.67 (m, 8 H, aromatic), 5.4 (s, IH, C-1 H), 5.05 (s, 2H, benzylic), 2.95 (s, 2H, benzylic), 1.25-2.48 (m, 8 H, aliphatic); MS (70 eV), m/e 366(M^).
Anal. Calcd for ^22^22^5’ ^ * 72.11; H, 6.05. Found:
C, 71.77; H, 6.18.
5-benzyloxy-2-carbornethoxy-2n-penty1-1-indanone(61).
To a slurry of NaH (1.2 g; 0.05 mol; 50% emulsion) in 10 mL of THF (freshly distilled) from (LiAlH^) was added with stirring under N2 a solution of 5-benzyloxy-2-carbomethoxy-
1-indanone (^7_ ; 5.92 g; 0.02 mol) in THF (60mL). The mixture was heated at 60— 7 0 °C for 15 min. and n-pentyl bromide (3.32 g; 0.022 mol) was added. The reaction mixture was worked up using methodology identical to that described for the preparation of 6 0 . Recrystallization from benzene/ hexane afforded 5.22 g (71%) of colorless crystals mp
48-50°C. IR(KBr) 1745, 1705 cm"^; {^H-} NMR (0001^)6
6 . 89-7 .73 (m, 8 H, aromatic), 5.12 (s, 2H, benzylic), 3.66
(s,3H, -CO2 CH3 ), 0.82- 2.67 (m, IIH, aliphatic). Calcd for the AB part (benzylic) 6^ 3.64, ô g 2.99 with J^g = 17.48 Hz.
Ana 1. Calcd for Cg^Eg^O^: C, 75.38; H, 7.15. Found:
C, 75.55; H, 7.25.
5-Benzyloxy-2n-pentyl~l-indanone(65). To a solution of
5-benzyloxy-2-carbomethoxy-2n-pentyl-1 -indanone (j^ ; 1.83g; 67
0.005 mol) in glacial HOAc (10 mL) was added 10 mL of dil
HCl solution. The reaction mixture was worked up using
methodology identical to that described for the preparation
of 6 ^ , Recrystallization from Me0 H/H 20 afforded 1.0 g (65%)
of colorless crystals mp 69-71°C. IR (KBr) 1700 cm ^ ; {^H-}
NMR (0 0 0 1 3 ) 6 6.63-7.50 (m, 8H, aromatic), 5.13 (s, 2h;
benzylic), 2.53-3.27 (m, 3H, ABO pattern of 2H-3 and H-2 ),
0.90- 1.96 (m, IIH, aliphatic).
Anal. Oalcd for C2 1 H 2 4 O 2 : 0,81.79; H, 7.84. Found :
0,81.84; 8.00.
Methyl 5-Benzyloxy-1-oxo-2n-pentyl-2-indanpropionate
(69) and Its Free A c i d (47 ). To a solution of
5-benzyloxy-2n-pentyl-l-indanone (^5^ ; 3.08 g; 0.01 mol) in
t-BuOH (25 mL) was added t-BuOK (0.44 g; 0.004 mol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature under N2 for 5h.
Methyl acrylate (1.72 g; 0.02 mol) was added and stirring
continued overnight. The reaction mixture was worked up using methodology identical to that described for 6 8 .
Recrystallization from MeOH afforded white needles mp
7 1 -7 3 °C. IR (KBr) 1750, 1710 cm“^; {^H-} NMR (0001^)0
6.93-7 . 72 (m, 8 H, aromatic), 5.14 (s, 2H, benzylic), 3.61
(s j 3H, -CO2 CH 3 ), 0.83-2.32 (m, 15H, aliphatic). Calcd for
the AB part (benzylic) 6 ^ 3.03, 6 g 2.83 with = 17.92 Hz.
Ana1. Calcd for C, 76.14; H,7.66. Found :
C, 76.39; H, 7.91. 68
Hydrolysis of ester 6^ afforded a yellow semi-solid
which was recrystallized from CHCI3 /benzene/hexane to give
2.5 g (65%) of white crystals mp 69-71°C. IR (KBr) 3400,
1730, 1690 cm“^; NMR (CDCI3 ) 6 6.91- 7.71 (m, 8 H, aromatic), 5.12 (s, 2H, benzylic), 0.81- 2.32 (m, 15H, aliphatic). Calcd for the AB part (benzylic) 6 ^ 3.03, 6 g
2.82 with = 17.8 Hz; MS (70 eV), 380(M*).
A n a l . Calcd for C 2 4 H 2 gO^: C, 75.76; H, 7.41. Found ;
C, 75.50; H 7.25.
( trans)-5-Benzyloxy-1 —hydroxy-2n-pentyl-2-indanpropionic
Acid (5^). To a solution of NaBH^ (0.114 g; 0.003 mol) in
0.2 N NaOH (1 mL) was added a solution of 5-benzyloxy-1-cxo-
2n-pentyl-2-indanpropionic acid (42 ; 1.14 g; 0.003 mol) in
H 2 O (15 ml) containing NaOH (0.12 g; 0.003 mol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 days. The reaction mixture was worked up using methodology identical to that described for the preparation of 51 .
Recrystallization from CHCI 3 /benzene/hexane afforded 0.97 g
(85%) of white crystals mp 1 4 1 — 1 4 2 °C. IR (KBr) 3400, 1680 cm ^; {^H-} NMR (CDCl^) 6 6.78-7.72 (m, 8 H, aromatic), 5.04
(s, 2H,benzylic), 4.72 (s, IH, C-1 H), 0.82-2.45 (m, 15H, aliphatic), calcd for the AB part (benzylic) 2.96, f g
2.44 with = 16.21 Hz; MS (70 eV) 3 8 2 (m ‘‘’).
A n a l . Calcd for C 2 4 H 3 q O ^ : C,75.38; H, 7.90. Found :
C, 75.35; H, 8.04. 69
5-B enzyloxy-2-carbomethoxy-2n-propy1- l-indanone(59) .
To a slurry of NaH (1.2 g; 0.05 mol; 50% emulsion) in 10 mL
of THF (freshly distilled) was added with stirring under N 2
a solution of 5-benzyloxy-2-carbomethoxy-l-indanone (52^ ;
5.9 g; 0.02 mol) in THF (60 mL). The mixture was heated at
60-70°C for 15 min and n-propyl bromide (2.7 g; 0.022 mol)
was added. The reaction mixture was worked up using methodology identical to that described for the preparation
of 60. Recrystallization from benzene/hexane afforded 5.7 g
(75%) of light yellow crystals mp 72-74°C. IR (KBr)1735,
1705 cm ^NMR (CDCl^) 6 6.97-7.76 (m, 8H, aromatic),
5.15 (s, 2H, benzylic), 3.7 (s, 3H, -CO2 CH3 ), 0.8-2.07 (m,
7H, aliphatic). Calcd for the AB part (benzylic) 5^ 3.65,
6 g 3.01 with - 17.48 Hz; MS (70 eV), m/e 338(M*).
A n a l . Calcd for C2 7 H 2 2 O 4 : C , 74.53; H, 6.55. Found:
C, 74.55; H, 6.47.
5-Benzyloxy-2n-propyl-l— indanone(63). To a solution of
5-benzyloxy-2-carbomethoxy-2n-propyl-l-indanone (22. » 1*69 g; 0.005 mol) in glacial HOAc (10 mL) was added 10 mL of dil HCl solution. The reaction mixture was worked up using methodology identical to that described for the preparation of 6^* Recrystallization from MeOE/H20 afforded 1.09 g
(78%) of colorless crystals mp 5 5 -5 7 °C. IR (KB) 1700cm ^;
{^H-} NMR (€0 0 1 3 ) 6 6 .9 5 - 7 . 7 5 (m, 8H, aromatic), 5.14 (s, 2H, benzylic), 2.66-3. 33 (m, 3H, ABC pattern of 2H-3 and H-2),
0.88-1.98 (m, 7H, aliphatic); MS (70 eV), m/e 280(M+), 70
A nal. Calcd for Cj^gH2o02’ C,81.38; H,7.18. Found:
C, 81,44; H, 7,37.
Methyl 5-Ben2yloxy-l-oxo-2n-propy1-2-IndanpropIonate
(67 ) and Its Free Acld(45 ). To a solution of
5-benzyloxy-2n-propyl-l-indanone ; 2.8 g; 0.01 mol) in
t-BuOH (25 mL) was added t-BuOK (0.44 g; 0.004 mol). The
reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature under N 2
for 5 h. Methyl acrylate (1.72 g; 0.02 mol) was added and
stirring continued overnight. The reaction mixture was
worked up using methodology identical to that described for
68 . Ester 7^ was not further purified, but hydrolyzed to
acid 4^ using 10% NaOH solution (MeOH: H 2 O; 2: 8 ).
Recrystallization from benzene/hexane afforded 2.46 g (70%)
of colorless crystals mp 1 2 2 -1 2 4 °C. IR (KBr) 3400, 1740,
1705 cm ^; {^H-} NMR (CDClg)g 6.94-7.73 (m, 8H, aromatic),
5.14 (s, 2H, benzylic), 0.85-2.3 (m, IIH, aliphatic). Calcd
for the AB part (benzylic) g^ 3.06,g g 2.85 with = 17.46
Hz; MS (70 eV), m/e 3 5 2 (M*).
Ana 1. Calcd for 022^24^4" 74.97; H, 6 .8 6 . Found:
C, 75.04; H, 6.87.
( trans)-5-Benzyloxy-1-hydroxy-2n-propy1-2-indanpropionic
Acid (5_0). To a solution of NaBH^ (o.l4 g; 0.003 mol) in
0.2 N NaOH (1 mL) was added a solution of 5-benzyloxy-1-0 x 0 -
2n-propy 1-2-indanpropionic acid ( ^ ; 1.06 g; 0.003 mol) in 71
H 2 O (15 mL) containing NaOH (0.12 g; 0.003 mol). The
reaction mixture was worked up using methodology identical
to that described for the preparation of 51.
Recrystallization from MeOH/benzene/hexane afforded 1.0 g
(95%) of white crystals mp 125-127^0. IR (KBr) 3500, 1700
cm ^NMR (CDCl^) 5 6 . 8 (m, BE, aromatic), 5.05 (s, 2H,
benzylic), 4.75 (s, IE, C-1 E), 0.93- 2.47 (m, H E ,
aliphatic). Calcd for the AB part (benzylic) 6 ^ 2.99, 6 g
2.44 with J^g - 16.2 Ez; MS (70 eV), m/e 3 5 4 (m ‘‘‘).
A n a l . Calcd for 74.56; E, 7.39. Found:
C, 74.47; E, 7.45.
5-Benzyloxy-2-carhomethoxy-2-ethy1-1-indanone(58) . To
a solution of NaE (1.2 g; 0.05 mol; 50% emulsion) in 10 mL
of TEF (freshly distilled) was added with stirring under N 2
a solution of 5-benzyloxy-2-carbomethoxy-l-indanone (22. • »
5.9 g; 0.02 mol) in TEF (60 mL). The mixture was heated at
60-70*^C for 15 min and ethyl bromide (2.39 g; 0.022 mol) was added. The reaction mixture was worked up using methodology
identical to that described for the preparation of 60.
Recrystallization from benzene/hexane afforded 4.44 g (6 8 %)
of light yellow crystals mp 6 6 -6 8 °C. IR (KBr) 1765, 1710 cm ^; {^E-} NMR (CDClg)g 6.98-7.76 (m, BE, aromatic), 5.16
(s, 2H, benzylic), 3.7 (s, 3E, -CO2 CE3 ), 2.02 (q, 2E, CE2 ,
7.31 Hz), 0.87 (t, 3E, CE3 , J= 7.31 Ez). Calcd for the
AB part (benzylic) 6 ^ 3.66, 6 g 3.02 with J^g = 17.48 Hz; MS
(70 eV), m/e 326(M+>. 72
A n a l » Calcd for ^20^20^4* 73»60; H, 6.17. Founds
C, 73.70; H, 6.40.
5~Benzyloxy-2-ethyl-l-lndanone(62) . To a solution of
58 (3.26 g; 0.01 mol) in glacial HOAc (10 mL) was added 10
mL of dil HCl solution. The reaction mixture was worked up
using methodology identical to that described for the
preparation of Recrystallization from MeOH/H 20 afforded
1.86 g (70%) of colorless crystals mp 62-64°C. IR (KBr)
1700 cm ^ NMR (CDClg)g 6.96-7.75 (m, 8 H, aromatic),
5.15 (s, 2H, benzylic), 2.5-3.33 (m, 3H, ABC pattern of 2H-3
and H-2), 1.53- 1.97 (m, 2H, CHg)^ 0.99 (t, 3H, CH 3 , J= 7.31
Hz) .
Anal. Calcd for CigH^gO^: C, 81.16; H, 6.81. Found:
C, 81.30; H, 6.82.
Methyl 5-Benzyloxy-2-ethy1-1-oxo-2-indanpropionate(6 6 )
and Its Free Acid(44). To a solution of 5-benzyloxy-
2-ethyl-l-indanone ( 6_2 ; 1.33 g; 0.005 mol) in t-BuOH (25 mL) was added t-BuOK (0.22 g; 0.002 mol). The mixture was
stirred at room temperature under N£ for 5 h. Methyl
acrylate (0.9 g; 0.01 mol) was added and stirring continued
overnight. The reaction mixture was worked up using methodology identical to that described for 6 8 . Hydrolysis
of ester 6^ afforded a yellow semi-solid which was recrystallized from benzene/hexane yielding 1.1 g (65%) of 73
white crystals tup 155-157°C. IR (KBr) 3400, 1730, 1700
cm ^NMR (CDClg) 5 6.92-7.71 (m, 8H, aromatic), 5.12
(s, 2H, benzylic), 0.77-2.16 (m, 9H, aliphatic). Calcd for
the AB part (benzylic) 3.05, g g 2.83 with = 17.52 Hz;
MS (70 eV), m/e 338(M^^.
A n a l . calcd for ^ 2 1 ^ 2 2 ^ ^ ’ ^ » 74.53; Hj 6.55. Found:
C, 74.39; H, 6.59.
(trans)-5-Benzyloxy-2-ethy1-1-hydroxy-2-Indanproplonlc
Acid (4_2) ' To a solution of NaBH^ (0.114 g; 0.003 mol) In
0.2 N NaOH (1.0 mL) was added a solution of 5-benzyloxy-
2-ethyl-l-oxo-2-lndanproplonlc acid (4_4 ; 1.01 g; 0.003 mol)
In H 2 O (15 mL) containing NaOH (0.12 g; 0.003 mol). The
reaction mixture was worked up using methodology Identical
to that described for the preparation of 51.
Recrystalllzatlon from CHCI3 /benzene/hexane afforded 0.82 g
(80%) of white crystals mp 124—126°C. IR (KBr) 3400, 1690
cm“^; {^H-> NMR (CDCl^) g 6.78-7.72 (m, 8H, aromatic), 5.13
(s; 2H, benzylic), 4.75 (s, IH, C-1 H), 0.7-2.17 (m, 9H, aliphatic). Calcd for the AB part (benzylic) g ^ 2.95, 5 %
2.44 with = 15.26 Hz; MS (70 eV), m/e 340(M^).
A n a l . Calcd for C2 1 H 2 4 O 4 : C , 74.10; H, 7.10. Found:
C,74.52; E, 6.73. Chapter VII
PHARMACOLOGY
Introduction
Dibenzyloxyindanpropionic acid (j^) was found to inhibit
PGF2Q; “induced contractions of the isolated uterine strip with an IC50 of 3 . . This compound also exhibited in vivo protective effects against the abortifacient action of PGF 2 Q' in the mouse at an intramascular dose of 50 mg/
Kg^^*. The monobenzy loxyindanpropionic acid deivative A_6 tested previously showed slightly diminished activity against PGF 2q; “induced contractions of the uterus in vitro, with an IC50 of 7 xlO~^M^^^. The pharmacological activity of compounds 4^, and 51 was studied on the isolated mouse uterus stimulated with PGF 2 Q,.
Methods
Female albino CD-I mice, weighing 20-27 g, and in natural estrous, were sacrificed by cervical dislocation.
The uterine horns were isolated and prepared for isometric contraction recordings under 2 0 0 mg tension in oxygenated tissue baths maintained at 37°C. The composition of the bathing solution was (g/L): NaCl 8.046; KCl 0.2; CaCl2 *2 H 20
- 74 - 75
0.132; MgClg.SHgO 0.106; NaHCO^ 1.0; NaHgPO^.HgO 0.065;
dextrose 1.0. Following an equilibration period of 30 mins, -7 two 5-min control responses to PGF^^CIO M) were obtained,
followed each time by a 20-min washout period. The agent to
be tested was then added at a given concentration to the
bath and left in contact with the tissue for 5 mins prior to _7 addition of 10 M PGF^^. After recording the 5-min response
to PGF2 Q^in the presence of the test agent i the tissue was
washed for 20 mins with the physiological medium. Recovery
of the responsiveness of the tissue to ?GF 2a then -7 ascertained by adding 10 M PGFj^ for 5 mins. Finally, the
tissue was washed for 10 mins, the resting tension recorded
for 3 mins. Control uterine tissues were not exposed to the
test compound, but were otherwise treated similarly to the
test tissues. In these control tissues, the response to
PGF2 q; did not decline with repeated exposure. The integrat ed contractile force generated by PGF2 Q; in the presence of the test compound was expressed as a percentage of the mean of the two initial control responses to PGF 2 0 ; recorded prior to addition of the test agent. Recovery responses were expressed similarly.
The test compounds were dissolved in 100 pL 0.25 N
NaOH, and diluted with 100 pL distilled H 2 O to pH 7. PGF tromethamine and the test compounds were added in 10 pL volumes to the 10 mL tissue bath to obtain the desired concentrations. 76
Results and Discussion
Table 1 shows the effect of the test compounds on the
contractile response of the mouse uterus to PGF 2^ . None of
the test compounds had any effect at a concentration of
10 ^M. Compound 5J^ had no activity at a concentration of
10 and resulted in only a 2 0 % inhibition of the response
to PGF20; at the 1 0 ~^M concentration. Compounds 4^ and ^ at -5 a concentration of 10 M only weakly inhibited the PGFg^
response, and their approximate ICgg > 10 Recovery of
the tissue from the inhibitory effects of 45 and 5_^ was
essentially complete, while recovery from 44 was slightly
diminished.
Table 1. Effects of 4_5 and 5_1_ on PGF 2 Q-“induced
Contractions of the Mouse Uterus.
Compound n Cone. % Inhibition of % Recovery of PGF 2Q; response PGF2 q response
51 7 10“^M 0 91.70
8 lO'^M 20.39 103.70
45 9 1 0 "^M 12.16 92.20
11 10*4% 46.12 90.88
^ 1 lO'^M 27.29 69.32
6 1 0 "^M 44.42 70.39 77
The results indicate that the monobenzyloxyindan- propionic acids are weaker than dibenzyloxyindanpropionic acid in their ability to antagonize PGF^g induced uterine contractions.
Further pharmacological investigations, of the new compounds prepared throughout this work, are in progress to determine potential selectivity for other PG receptors. REFERENCES
(1) Karim, S. M. M. ; Hiller, K. 2» Obstet. Gyneac. Br.
Commonw. 1970, J J _ t 837—839.
(2) Williams, K. I.; Vane, J. R. Pharmacol. Ther. 1975, IB, 89-113.
(3) Zuckerman, H.; Harpaz-Kerpel, S. In "Practical Applications of prostaglandins and their Synthesis Inhibitors” Karim S. M. M., Ed., Univ. Park Press, Baltimore, Md. 1979, 411-435.
(4) Levy, B. ; Lindner, H. R. B_r ' 2" Pharmacol. 197lj 43 i 236-241.
(5) Vane, J. R. Nature (New Biol) 1971 , 231,, 232-235.
(6 ) Eakins, K. E. ; Banner, J . H. In "The Prostaglandins, Progress in Research"; Karim,S. M. M., Ed. Medical and Technical Publishing Co. Ltd, Oxford and London, 1972, 261-292.
(7) Witiak, D . T.; Kakodkar, S. V.; Johnson, T. P.; Baldwin, J. R. ; Rahwan, R. G. 2* Med. Chem. 1979, 22» 77-81.
(8 ) Kurzrok, R. ; Leib, C. C. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol.Med. 1930, 28, 268-272.
(9) Cockrill, J. R . ; Miller, E. G . Jr.; Kurzrok, R. Am. 2* Physiol. 1935, 2 1 1 » 577-580.
(10) Goldblatt, M. W . Chem. Ind. (London) 1933, 11, 1056.
(11) von Euler, Ü. S. Arch. Exp. Path. Pharmacol. 1943, 1 75. 78.
(12) von Euler, U. S. S k a n d . A r c h . P h y s i o l . 1939, 81 , 65-80; Chem. Abst. 1939, 33, 29642.
(13) von Euler, U . S. Klin. Wochensch. 1935, 14, 1182-1183; Chem. Abst. 1936, 22» 30403.
(14) von Euler, U.S. 2* P h y s i o l . 1936, 8 8 , 213-234.
— 78 — 79
(15) Bergstrom, S.; Danlelsson, H.; Klenberg, D.; Samuelsson, B. 2" B i o l . Chem. 1964, 239, 4006-4008.
(16) Bergstrom, S.; Danlelsson, H.; Samuelsson, B. Biochem. Biophys. A c t a . 1964, 22.» 207-210.
(17) van Dorp, D. A. ; Beerthuis, R. K. ; Nugteren, D. H. ; Vonkeman, H. Nature (London) 1964, 203, 839-841.
(18) van Dorp, D. A. ; Beerthuis, R. K. ; Nugteren, D. H. ; Vonkeman, H. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1964, 9 0 , 204-207.
(19) Bindra, J. S.; Bindra, R. Prog. Drug Res. 1973, 17 , 410.
(20) Kunze, H. ; Vogt. W. Ann. N . Y. Acad. Sci. 1971 , 180, 123-125.
(21) Lundberg, W.C. Chem. Ind. (London) 1965, 572-582.
(22) Burr, G. 0.; Burr, M. M. J. Biol. Chem. 1930, 8 6 , 587-621.
(23) Jouvenaz, G . H; Nugteren, D. H.; Beerthuis, R. K.; van Dorp, D. A. Biochem. Biophys.Ac t a . 1970, 202, 231.
(24) Howton, D. R. ; Mead, J. R. J. Biol. Chem. 1960, 235, 3385-3386.
(25) Cuthbert, M. F. (Ed.) "The Prostaglandins", William Hineman Medical Books Ltd., London 1973, 23-124.
(26) Bergstron, S.; Carlson, L. A. ; Weeks, J. R. Pharm. R e v . 1968, 2j0, 1.
(27) Carlson, L. A. Prog. Biochem. Pharm. 1967, 94-109.
(28) Coceani, F. ; Dreifuss, J. J.; Puglisi, L . ; Wolfe, L. S., In "Prostaglandins, Peptides and Amines" Manetegazza, P.; Horton, E. W ., Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1969, 73.
(29) von Euler, U. S.; Eliasson, R. "Prostaglandins", Medicinal Chemistry Monographs, Academic Press, New York, 1967, 8 .
(30) Fried, J.; Lin, C.; Mehra, M.;Kao, W .; Dalven, P. Ann. N.Y. Ac a d . S c i . 1971 , 180, 38-63.
(31) Kaley, G.; Weiner, R. Ann. N . ^ . A c a d . Sci. 1971, 18 0, 338-350. 80
(32) Kloeze, J. Biochem» Biophys. Acta » 1969, 187 , 285.
(33) Nakano, J » ; Ishii, T.; Gin, A. C. Clin » Res « 1968, 30.
(34) Ramwell, P.W.; Shaw, J. E. Rec. Prog. Hor. Res. 19701 26, 139-187.
(35) Schofield, J.G. Nature (london) 1970, 2 2 8 . 179-180.
(36) Bergstrom, S.; Carlson, L. A.; Oro, L. Acta. Physiol. Scand. 1964, 170-180.
(37) Strong, C. G . ; Bohr, D . F. Am. J. Physiol. 1967, 213, 725-733.
(38) Cuthbert, M. F. In "The Prostaglandins: Pharmacological and Therapeutic Advances" Cuthbert, N. F. , Ed., J. P. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, 1973, 253-286.
(39) Parker, C. W . ; Snider, D . E . Ann. Intern. Med. 1973, 28, 963-965.
(40) Zurier, R.B. A r c h . Intern. M e d . 1974, 13 3, 101-110.
(41) Horton, E. W. Physiol. R e v . 1969, 2?.» 122-161.
(42) Horton, E. W. "Prostaglandins" Monograph on Endocrinology, Vol. 7, Springer-Verlog, Berlin, 1972.
(43) Coceani, F . A r c h . Inte r n . M e d . 1974, 133, 119-129.
(44) Steinberg, D . ; Vaughan, M. ; Nestel, P. J.; Bergestrom, S. 2* Clin. Invest. 1964, 43, 1533-1540.
(45) Hedqvist, P. Acta. Physiol. Scand. 1969, 7 5 , 511-512.
(46) Bito, L. Z. Prostaglandins, 1975, 2» 851-855.
(47) Horton, E.W. 2* Pharm. Pharmacol. 1976, 2 8 , 389-392.
(48) Silver, M. J.; Smith, J. B. Life S ci. 1975, 16, 1635-1648.
(49) Burke, G .; Chang, L.L.; Szabo, M. Science, 1973, 180, 872-875.
(50) Greenberg, S.; Long, J. P.; Diecke, F. P. J. Arch. Int. Pharmacoldyn. 1973, 204, 373-389.
(51) Villani, F. ; Chiarra, A.; Cristalli, S.; Piccinini, F. Experienta 1974, 22.» 532-534. 81
(52) Emmons, P. R. ; Hampton, J. R. ; Harrison, M. J. G. ; Honour, A. J.; Mitchell, J. R. A. Br. Med. 1967,
2 , 468-472.
(53) Hittelman, K. J.; Butcher, R. W. In "The Prostaglandins: Pharmacological and Therapeutic Advances", Cuthbert, M. P., Ed.; Heinemann, London, 1973, 151.
(54) Kuehl, F. A. Jr. Prostaglandins, 1974, 2» 325-340.
(55) Kuehl, F. A. Jr.; Cirillo, V. J.; Ham, E. A . ; Humes, J.
L. Advan. Biosci. 1973, 9 ^ , 155-172.
(56) Kuehl, F . A. Jr.; Humes, J. L.; Cirillo, V. J.; Ham, E. A. In "Advances in Cyclic Nucleotides Research", Vol. 1, Greengard, P.; Paoletti, R.; Robinson, G. A., Eds., Ravon Press, New York, 1972, 493-502.
(57) Kuehl, F . A. Jr. In "Prostaglandin and Cyclic AMP", Khan, R. H.; Lands, W. E. M., Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1973, 223-225.
(58) Goldberg, N. D .; Haddox, M. K .; Dunham, E .; Lopez, C.; Hadden, J . W . In "Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on the Regulation of Proliferation in Animal Cells", Clark, B .; Baserga, R. , Eds., Cold Spring Harbor 1974, 609.
(59) Goldberg, N. D . ; Haddox, M. K . ; Nichol, S. E . ; Glass, D. B.; Sanford, C. H., Kuehl, F. A. Jr.; Estensen, R. In "Advances in Cyclic Nucleotide Research", Vol. 2» Drummond, G . I.; Greengard, P.; Robinson, G . A. Eds., Ravon Press, New York, 1975, 307-330.
(60) Goldberg, N. D . ; Haddox, M. K .; Zeilig, C. E .; Nichol, S. E .; Acott, T. S.; Glass, D . B . J . Invest. Dermatol.
1976, 6^ , 641.
(61) Weismann, G .; Goldstein, I.; Hoffstein, S.; Chauvet, G . A n n . N. Y. A c a d . Sc i . 1975, 2 56, 222.
(62) Goldberg, N. D .; Haddox, M. K .; Hartle, D. K.; Hadden, J. W. Proc. 5th Int. Congr. Pharmacology, San Francisco, 1972, 2» 146 (Karger, Basel, 1973).
(63) Dunham, E .; Haddox, M. K ; Goldberg, N. D. Proc. Nat.
A c a d . S c i . 1974, 7 _ 1 , 815.
(64) Fried, J .; Heim, S.; Sunder-Plassman, P.; Etherdge, S. J.; Santhanakrishnan, T. S.; Himizu, J. In "Prostaglandin Symposium of the Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology”, Ramwell, P. W .; Shaw, J. E. 82
Eds., New York, John Wiely and Sons, Intersci. 1967, 351-363.
(65) Fried, J.; Heim, S.; Etheredge, S. J.; Sunder-Plassman, P.; Santhanakrishnan, T. S.; Himizu, J. Lin, C. H. Chem. Comm. 1968, 634-635.
(6 6 ) Fried, J.; Lin, C. H. ; Mehra, M. M . ; Kao, W. L . ; Dalven, P. A n n . N. A c a d . Sci. 1971, 1 80, 38-63.
(67) Fried, J.; Santhanakrishnan, T. S.; Himizu, J . ; Linj C. H. ; Ford, S. H. ; Rubin, B . ; Grigas, E. 0. Nature (London) 1969, 2 ^ , 208,210.
(6 8 ) Flack, J. D. Discussion in Recent Prog. Horm. Res.
1970, 2 6 , 174-176.
(69) Bennett, A. ; Posner, J. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1971, 4 2 1 584-594.
(70) Vesin,M. F . ; Harbon, S. M o l . P h a r macol. 1974, 1 0 , 457-473.
(71) Kuehl, F. A. Jr.; Humes, J. L .; Tarnoff, J.; Cirillo, V. J.; Ham, E. A. Science 1970, 1 6 9 , 883-886.
(72) Burke, G. ; Kowalski, K. ; Babiaz, D. Life Sci. (II) 1971, 513-521.
(73) Burke, G .; Kowalski, K .; Sato, S. Prostaglandins 1972,
2 , 441-452.
(74) Burke, G. ; Santo, S. Life Sci. (II) 1971, 969-981 .
(75) Burke, G .; Sato, S.; Sazbo, M. ; Kowalski, K. Endocrinology 1972, 9 0, 343-356.
(76) Ozer, A . ; Sharp, G . W. G . 2" P h y s i o l . 1972, 2 2 2 , 674-680.
(77) M a r u m o , F .; Edelman, I. S. 2* C l l n « Invest. 1971, 5 0 , 1613-1620.
(78) Kuehl, F. A. Jr.; Humes, J. L. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. 1972, 69, 480-484.
(79) Rao, Ch. V. Prostaglandins 1973, 2» 567-576.
(80) Miller, 0. V.; Magee, W. E. A d v . B i osci. 1973, 9^, 83-89. 83
(81) Marazzl, A. M. ; Matschinsky, F. M. Prostaglandins 1972 , _1 , 373-388.
(82) Marazzl, A. M. ; Matschinsky, F. M. Prostaglandins
1972, I, 389-395.
(83) Ahren, K . ; Perkle, T. A d v . Biosci. 1973, 2» 717-721.
(84) Johnson, M. ; Ramwell, P. W. Adv. Biosci. 1973, 205-212.
(85) Coyne, W. E . ; Cusic, J. W. 2" Med. Chem. 1968, 11 , 1158-1160.
(8 6 ) Sanner, J. H. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 1969, 180, 46-56.
(87) Ambache, N . ; Verney, J.; Aboo Zar, M. 2* Physiol. (London) 1970, 2 2 7 , 761-782.
(8 8 ) Splawinski, J. A.; Nies, A. S.; Bieck, P. R.; Oates, J. A. Pharmacologist 1971, 13, 557.
(89) Splawinski, J. A.; Nies, A. S.; Sweetman, B .; Oates, J. A. 2* Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1973, 187, 501—510.
(90) Bennett, A.; Jaroski, C .; Sanger, G. J.; Wilson, D. E. B r . 2* Pharmacol. 1980, 71 , 169-175.
(91) Posner, J. 2£. 2* Pharmacol. 1973, 49, 415-427.
(92) Sanner, J. H. Intra Science Chem. Rept. 1972, 2» 1“9.
(93) JuanI H. ; Seewann, S. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1980, 65, 267-278.
(94) Rad zialowski, F. M. ; Novak, L. Life Sci. 1971, 10, 1261-1265.
(95) Rad zialowski, F. M . ; Novak, L. Life S c i . (I I ) 1973, 22, 337-343.
(96) Illiano, G . ; Cuatrecasas, P. Nature (New B iol) 1971, 234, 72-74.
(97) Sanner, J. H.; Mueller, R. A.; Schulze, R- H. Adv. Biosci. 1973, 2» 139-148.
(98) Diczfaluzy, E . ; Ferno, 0.; Fex, H. ; Hogberg, B .; Linderot, T.; Rosenberg, T. Acta. Chem. Scand. 1953, 2, 913-920. 84
99) Beitch, B. R.; Eakins, K. E. B_r. 2" Pharmacol. 1969, 37 , 158-167.
100) Eakins, K. E. ; Karim, S. M. M. Life Sci. 1970, 2» 1-5.
101) Eakins, K. E.; Karim, S. M. M.; Miller, J. D. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1970, 39 , 556-563.
102) Eakins, K. E.; Miller, J. D.; Karim, S. M. M. J. Pharmacol. E x p . T h e r . 1971, 17 6, 441— 447.
103) Eakins, K. E. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1971, 180, 386-395.
104) Bethel, R. A.; Eakins, K. E. Exp. Eye Res. 1972, 13, 83-91.
105) Eakins, K. E.; Whitelocke, R. A. F.; Perkins, E. S.;
Bennett, A. ; Unger, W. G. Adv. Biosci. 1973, 9_, 427-433.
106) Hart, S. L. Br. 2* Pharmacol. 1974, 22.» 159-160.
107) Mathe', A. A.; Strandberg, K.; Astrom, A. Nature (New Biol) 1971, 230, 215-216.
108) Park, M . K.; Dyer, D. C. Prostaglandins 1973, 2» 913-920.
109) Adaikan, P. G.; Karim, S. M. M. Prostaglandins 1974, 2, 411-417.
110) Gimeno, M. F.; Gimeno, A. L.; Lima, F.; Borola, E. Acta Physiol. L a t . Am e r . 1973, 2 3 , 105-112.
111) Villaneuva, R.; Hinds, L.; Katz, R. L .; Eakins, K. E. 2* Pharmacol. E x p . Ther. 1972, 1 8 0 , 78-85.
112) Mathe’j A. A.; Strandberg, K.; Fredholm, B. 2* Pharm. Pharmacol. 1972, 24, 378-382.
113) White, R. P.; Pennink, M. Arch. Int. Pharmaco dyn.Ther. 1972, 1 9 2 , 274-281.
114) Karim, S. M. M.; Adaikan, P. G. Int. Res. Com- m u n .System. 1974, 2» 1585.
115) Karim, S. M. M. Ann. Acad. Med. 1974, 2» 201—206.
116) Crutchley, D . J.; Piper, P. J.Arch. Pharmacol. 1973, 27 9, Supp. R, 20. 85
117) Strandberg, K.; Mathe', A. A.; Fredholm, B. Life Sci. 1972, 701-712.
118) Perklev, T.; Ahren, K. Life Sci. 1971, jJO, 1387-1393.
119) Kuehl, F. A. Jr.; Humes, J. L.; Mandel, L- R.; Cirillo, V. J.; Zanetti, M. E.; Ham, E. A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 1971, 44, 1464-1469.
120) Eakins, K. E.; Ra jadhyaksha, V.; Schroer, R. 2" Pharmacol. 1976, 58, 333-339.
121) Allan, G.; Levi, R. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1980, 214, 45-49.
122) Vulliemoz, Y.; Verosky, M.; Triner, L. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1981, 30, 1941-1946.
123) Vogt, W. Arch. Exp. Path. Pharmakol. 1959, 235, 550-558.
124) Jaques, R. Experientia 1969, 25, 1059-1060.
125) Collier, H. 0. J.; Sweatman, W. J. F. Nature (London) 1968, 2 1 ^ , 864-865.
126) Levy, B. ; Lindnier, H. R. Pharmacol. 1971, 236-241 .
127) Sorrentino, L. ; Capasso, F. ; Rosa, M. Eur. J." Pharmacol. 1972, 17, 306-308.
128) Ambache, N. 2» Physiol. (London) 1959, 146, 255-294.
129) Eliasson, R. Experientia 1958, 460-461.
130) Karim, S. M. M. ; Sharma, S. D . 2* Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw. 1971, 78, 251-254.
131) Yamamato, Y .; Feindel, W .; Wolfe, L. S.; Hodge, C. P. Adv. Biosci. 1973, 2» 359-367.
132) Tamura, S.; Kuzuna, S.; Kawai, K. 2* Pharm. Pharmacol. 1981, 33, 29-32.
133) Vane, J. R. Nature (New Biol) 1971, 231 , 232-235.
134) Das, U. N. ; Chinulu, B. V.; Naik, S. R. Indian 2* Exp. Biol. 1980, 2, 917-918.
135) Maddox, Y. T., Corey, E. J.; Ramwell, P. W. Prostaglandins 1977, 13, 1007. 86
(136) Maddox, Y. T.; Ramwell, P. W.; Shiner, C. S.; Corey, E. J. Nature (London) 1978, 27 3, 549—552.
137) Fitzpatrick, T. M.; Alter, I.; Corey, E. J.; Ramwell, P. W.; Rose, J. C.; Kot, P. A. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1978, 206, 139-142.
138) Stinger, R. B.; Fitzpatrick, T. M. ; Coreyj E . J.; Ramwell, P. W.; Rose, J. C.; Kot, P. A. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 1982, 2^, 521-525.
139) Gandini, A.; Lualdi, P.; Delia Bella, D. Arch - Int . Pharmacodyn. Ther.(Suppl.) 1972, 196, 179-181.
140) Waitzman, M. B. Am. J^. P h y s i o l . 1969, 217 , 1593-1598.
141) Coceani, F.; Wolfe, L. S. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1966, 933-950.
142) Gutknecht, G. D.; Duncan, G. W. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. M e d . 1972 , 406.
143) Hertelendy, F.; Peake, G.; Todd, H. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 1971 , 44 , 253-260.
144) Porter, D. G.; Behrman, H. R. Nature 1971, 232, 627-628.
145) Das, U. N.; Chainlu, B. V. IRCS Med. Sci. Lib.
Compend. 1980, 499-500; Chem. Abstr. 9 ^ , 106973e.
146) Karim, S. M. M. In "The Prostaglandins: Progress in Research” New York, Wiley-Intersci. , Karim, S. M. M., Ed., 1972, 71-164.
147) Bodine, M. J. Med. 1971, 2 , 587 .
148) Sche, J.; Bacillie, P. Adv. Biosci. 1973, 2* 743-749.
149) Aiken, J. W. Nature 1972, 240, 21-25.
150) Chester, R.; Dukes, M.; Slater, S. R.; Walpole, A. L. Nature 1972, 240, 37—38.
151) Waltman, R. ; Tricomi, V.; Palav, A. Prostaglandins 1973, 3, 47-58.
152) Witiak, D. T. In "Medicinal Chemistry" 3rd Ed., Part IIj Burger, A. Ed., Wiley-Intersci., New York, N. Y. 1970, chapter 65. 87
153) De Titta, G. T.; Edmonds, J. W.; Duax, W. L.
Prostaglandins 1975, 9_y 659-665.
154) Edmonds, J. W .; Duax, W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975,
9 7 _ y 413.
155) Abrahamsson, S. Acta Crystallogr. 19 63 , 16, 409.
156) Edmondsj J. W.; Duax, W. L. Prostaglandins 1974, 275-281.
157) Langs, D. A.; Erman, M. ; De Titta, G. T. Science
1977 , 1 9 7 _ y 1003-1005.
158) Leovey, E. M. K. ; Anderson, N. H. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 4148-4150.
159) Leovey, E. M. K. ; Anderson, N. H. Prostaglandins 1975, 1^, 789-794.
160) Kimball, F. A.; Lauderdale, J. W.; Nelson, N. A.; Jackson, R. W. Prostaglandins 1976, 985.
161) Nakano, J. ; Anggarad, E.; Samuelsson, B. Eur. B iochem. 1969, 1 1 , 386.
162) De Titta, G. T.; Langs, D. A. ; Edmonds, J. W. Biochem. 1979, 3387-3391.
163) Witiak, D. T.; Muhi-El Deen, Z.; Mahishi, N. ; Sethi, 0. P.; Gerald, M. C. J. Med. Chem. 1971, 24-30.
164) Gerald, M. C.j Sethi, 0. P.; Muhi-El Deen, Z.; Mahishij N. ; Witiak, D. T. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. T h e r . 1971, 1 ^ , 78-87.
165) Bennett, A. In "Advances in Drug Research" Harper, N. J .; Simmonds, A. B. Eds. 1974, 83— 118.
166) Johnson, W. S.; Anderson, J. N . ; Shelberg, W. E. ^J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944, 66, 218-222.
167) Bruce, D. B. ; Sorrie, A. J. S.; Thomson, R. H. J.» C h e m . Soc. 1953, 2403— 2406.
168) House, H. 0.; Carlson, R. G.; Muller, H .; Noltes, A. W. ; Slater, C. D. J_" Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 2614-2620.
169) Chinn, L. J.; Brown, E. A.; Mikulec, R. A.; Garland, R. B. 2" Org. Chem. 1962, 2_7 , 1733-1741 . 88
(170) House, H. 0.; Babad, H.; Toothill, R. B.; Noltes, A. W. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27., 4141-4146.
(171) Dauben, W. G.; Fonken, G. J.; Noyce, D. S. J. Am. Chem. S o c . 1956, 78., 2579-2582.
(172) Dauben, W. G.; Blanz, E. J. Jr.; Jiu, J.; Mlchell, R. A. 2" Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 7^, 3752-3755.
(173) Wheeler, D. M. S.; Wheeler, M. Chem. Ind. (London) 1961, 463.
(174) Donbrow, M. 2" Cbem. Soc. 1959, 1613-1615.
(175) Heasllp, R. J.; Rahwan, R. G.; Hassanj A. M. M. ; Witiak, D. T. Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 1981, 32^, 251-259.
(176) Rahwan, R. G.; Del Vecchio, F. R. ; Witiak, D. T. Prostaglandins, submitted.