<<

Original Research Articles

Glucose Intolerance as a Consequence of Oral Treatment for Preterm Labor Alison Peterson, MD; Kevin Peterson, MD; Scott Tongen, MD; Martha Guzman, MD; Victor Corbett, MD; Oded Langer, MD; and Roger Mazze, PhD Minneapolis and St Paul, Minnesota, and San Antonio, Texas

Background. In this case series, glucose regulation is dL) for the five nondiabetic subjects treated with ter­ examined prospectively during treatment with terbuta­ butaline and values of patients in an historical control line sulfate for premature labor in women who were group (41 nondiabctic pregnancies [72 ± 22 mg/dL]) (1) previously documented as nondiabetic, (2) found who were not in premature labor. The four diabetic to have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and (3) subjects and the one subject who had not been previ­ tested for glucose intolerance while terbutaline was be­ ously tested also experienced higher blood glucose lev­ ing administered. The glucose profiles of women els during therapy. Glucose levels returned to treated with terbutaline were contrasted with the pro­ preintervention values with the cessation of terbutaline files of nondiabetic women and women known to have therapy. GDM who were not in premature labor. Conclusions. It has been previously suggested that ter­ Methods. Subjects tested capillary blood glucose an av­ butaline increases hepatic glycogenolysis, which may erage of five times a day during terbutaline treatment aggravate glucose intolerance. This phenomenon, com­ and for 1 week after terbutaline treatment was discon­ bined with normal pregnancy-induced insulin resis­ tinued. They used memory-based reflcctometers that tance, may explain abnormal ambulatory glucose pat­ stored and transmitted self-monitored blood glucose terns in women who are euglyccmic before data to a personal computer. introduction of terbutaline therapy. Results. A significant difference (P = .001) was found Key words. Terbutaline; premature labor; diabetes, ges­ between average fasting glucose values (111 ± 23 mg/ tational; hyperglycemia. / Pam Pract 1993; 36:25-31.

Premature labor, the onset of uterine contractions before rickets of prematurity, and retinopathy of prematurity.3-4 the 37th gestational week resulting in progressive cervi­ Rapid initiation of appropriate interventions may dimin­ cal effaccmcnt and dilatation, is a significant public health ish the risk of .1-5 problem in the United States (270,000 women annual­ Therapeutic options for premature labor include ly).1-3 Maternal consequences encompass premature rup­ bedrest with hydration in combination with tocolytic ture of amniotic membranes with associated endometri­ such as intravenous or (3-sym- tis, increased risk of thromboembolism, and prolonged pathomimetic agents including ritodrine and terbuta­ psychological distress. The premature infant is at in­ line.1-2 The clinical efficacy, flexibility of dosage required, creased risk for respiratory distress, apnea and bradycar­ ease of an administration, and relatively low cost have led dia, intraventricular hemorrhage, sepsis, hyperbiliru­ to widespread use of terbutaline sulfate for tocolysis.7-8 binemia, necrotizing enterocolitis, feeding dysfunction, Terbutaline is a /32- agonist that stimulates the (32 receptor in the uterine smooth muscle, thereby acti­ vating adenylate cyclase. This enzyme catalyzes the con­ Submitted, revised, A ugust 5, 1992. version of adenosine triphosphate to cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Intracellular cAMP inhibits From the Department of Family Practice and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis (A.P, K.P., S.T., M.G., R M .); the Depart­ myosin light chain kinase function, thus preventing uter­ ment of Medicine, United Hospital, St Paul, Minnesota (V.C.); and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University o f Texas Medical Center, San Antonio (O.L.). ine smooth muscle contraction.9-10 /32-Agonists also Requests for reprints should be sent to Alison Peterson, M D , Department o f Family stimulate fi2 receptors in the hcpatocytc membrane, Practice and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, 6-240 Phillips-Wangensteen Bldg, Box 381, UMHC, 516 Delaware St, Minneapolis, M N thereby activating hcpatocytc intracellular adenylate cy­ 55455. clase. This raises the hcpatocytc level of cAMP, resulting

© 1993 Appleton & Lange ISSN 0094-3509 The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1993 25 Glucose Intolerance and Terbutaline Peterson, Peterson, Tongen, et al

in a cascade effect that activates phosphorylasc and leads capillary blood samples and in the use of a memory-based to the conversion of stored glycogen to glucose.11 This glucose reflectometer capable of storing the blood glu­ hepatic sequence can result in maternal hyperglycemia in cose value with the corresponding time and date of the the absence of other homeostatic mechanisms.12’13 test (Glucometer M, Miles Laboratories Inc, Diagnostic Despite the known hyperglycemic action of terbu- Division, Elkhart, Ind). Subjects were asked to check talinc, it has been used as a tocolytic for nondiabctic their capillary blood glucose before each meal, 2 hours women as well as in pregnancies complicated by preges- postprandial, and at bedtime for the duration of the tational or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Admin­ terbutaline therapy and for 1 week after discontinuation istration of terbutaline to nondiabctic women has been of terbutaline therapy. Periodically, meters were checked associated with an increased incidence of neonatal hypo­ against results obtained by an independent laboratory glycemia.14’15 Some studies have shown that /3-mimetics (Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, Ohio) administered intravenously further aggravate the undcr- Adjustments for whole blood values were made in accor­ lying glucose intolerance in women with pregestational dance with the manufacturer’s guidelines. Decisions re­ diabetes.16-21 Main and coworkers22 found that patients garding the management of premature labor and any receiving standard dosages of terbutaline administered complications were made independent of the investiga­ orally for at least 1 week before glucose testing had a tors. The dosage and duration of the terbutaline treat­ higher incidence of diagnosis of gestational diabetes ment were recorded, as were the results of standard when given an oral glucose tolerance test as compared glucose testing and their timing in relationship to the with control patients. Experience with orally adminis­ onset of premature labor. tered ritodrine has not been shown to significantly in­ All subjects underwent a 1-hour, 50-g oral glucose crease the percentage of women diagnosed with gesta­ challenge test (GCT) in which plasma glucose results tional diabetes when tested after taking ritodrine for at >140 mg/dL were considered abnormal in accordance least 72 hours.23 There have been no reports based on with the National Diabetes Data Group criteria and ambulatory blood glucose monitoring throughout the hospital standards of practice.24 Gestational diabetes mel- duration of orally administered terbutaline in the nondi­ litus was diagnosed by a 3-hour, 100-g oral glucose abetic pregnancy or in the pregnancy complicated by tolerance test (OGTT). Two plasma glucose values >105 diabetes. In this case series, we sought to characterize mg/dL, 190 mg/dL, 165 mg/dL and 145 mg/dL at 0, 1, glucose regulation prospectively throughout the course 2, and 3 hours, respectively, were considered abnormal.24 of terbutaline treatment in women who (I) were previ­ Glucose data from the patient’s reflectometer were avail­ ously documented as nondiabctic, (2) had a diagnosis of able to the attending physician throughout the course of GDM, and (3) were tested for glucose intolerance during terbutaline treatment. Following delivery, infant birth- terbutaline therapy. weight, height, and neonatal glucose level were measured and any complications of labor and delivery were re­ corded. Methods Characterization of ambulatory glucose measure­ ment was accomplished through downloading the glu­ Women hospitalized with premature labor at a commu­ cose data collected by the subjects to a personal computer nity medical center were recruited for the study. All using Ambulatory Glucose Profile (Figure 1) and Glucofacts potential participants had premature uterine contractions software programs.25’26 Glucofacts uses the glucose values resulting in progressive cervical cffaccmcnt or dilatation stored in the reflectance meter to produce summary sta­ after the 19th gestational week. The diagnosis of prema­ tistics that provide an overall period mean, number of ture labor was made by the patient’s attending physician. tests per day, range of blood glucose values, and modal Gestational age was assessed according to the date of the day (Figure 2). The modal day collapses all blood glucose last menstrual period, ultrasound examination, and early values for a specified period, presenting them as if they pelvic examination. Terbutaline had been orally admin­ occurred on a single “typical” day. The Ambulatory Glu­ istered for at least 24 hours before the patient entered the cose Profile program, using these same data to produce a study. Women who had preeclampsia, pregnancy-in­ series of five curves, depicts the relative stability of glu­ duced hypertension, multiple medical problems, a hem­ cose control, assesses the degree of oscillation in the atocrit of less than 30% (to avoid glucose reflcctometcr median curve, and gauges the degree and number of error), a history of abuse, or who would be unavail­ significant changes in metabolic control throughout a able for follow-up (out-of-state transfers) were excluded. modal day. Its use in this study was to provide a means of After informed consent was obtained, a nurse spe­ characterizing the relative stability of blood glucose cialist in diabetes instructed all subjects in how to obtain throughout the period of terbutaline treatment and as a

26 The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1993 Glucose Intolerance and Terbutaline Peterson, Peterson, Tongen, et al

ending doses ranged from 7.5 mg every 4 hours to 45 mg every 3 hours. Duration of tocolytic treatment ranged from 8 to 129 days. In eight cases, tocolytic therapy was discontinued electively at 37 weeks’ gestation. In the remaining two cases, one subject underwent cesarean section for fetal distress after 34 weeks because of mater­ nal bleeding from a placenta previa, and in the second case terbutaline was withdrawn at 35 gestational weeks after demonstration of fetal lung maturity' in a twin gestation.

Classification Figure 1. Ambulator)' glucose profile (AGP) of a patient during Ten women were included in the study. Five women oral terbutaline therapy for premature labor. The five curves (patients A, F, G, H, and I) were nondiabctic before represent the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of terbutaline therapy. One woman (J) had a positive GCT blood glucose values. Using a smoothing algorithm, the AGP calculates each hourly glucose value as if it occurred during a and negative OGTT before tocolytic therapy. One single 24-hour period. Depicted on the x axis is a 24-hour woman (B) was found by OGTT to have gestational dock. On the y axis is the blood glucose value based on five diabetes before terbutaline therapy. An additional capillar)' samples/day taken over a period of 41 days. The bar woman (C) underwent OGTT during terbutaline ther­ graph above the x axis represents the relative frequency of apy and was found to be diabetic. Two women (D, E) testing at each hourly period. No tests were recorded between 12:30 am and 8:30 am or between 11:30 am and 12:30 pm . had a positive GCT while being treated with terbutaline. The largest number of tests were before lunch, before dinner, Based on these results (Table 1) five women were classi­ and after dinner. The horizontal lines from 60 mg/dL to 120 fied as nondiabetic because of either a negative GCT or a mg/dL represent the normal range of blood glucose values negative OGTT before tocolytic therapy. Four women based on nondiabetic controls. were classified diabetic because of a positive OGTT. One woman was classified as unknown because of a positive means of comparison with control patients. In previous GCT with no OGTT follow-up while taking terbutaline. studies, we found that stability has been closely associ­ ated with fetal size and other complications of hypergly­ Insulin and Diet Therapy cemia in pregnancy.27 Treatment for hyperglycemia varied in the study popu­ lation. Three women in whom GDM was diagnosed

Results B Twenty-eight women hospitalized with premature labor who met all criteria were asked to participate in the study. Seventeen women declined participation when requested to follow the glucose monitoring protocol. Of the 11 women who consented, one did not report any blood glucose values and was dropped from the study. The remaining subjects tested their glucose levels an average of 5.3 times per day as verified by memory recording in die meter. Clinical characteristics are sum­ marized in Table 1. The age o f participants ranged from 19 to 37 years. Three patients were obese before concep­ tion, with a body mass index (weight in kg/height in Figure 2. Modal day graph of the blood glucose levels of a meters squared) greater than 27.3. Onset of premature previously nondiabetic patient given terbutaline for premature labor ranged from the 20th to the 33 rd gestational week, labor. An average of five self-monitored blood glucose tests with an average onset during the 30th week. Terbutaline each day for 41 days is depicted. The x axis represents a typical administration occurred immediately after diagnosis of 24-hour period. The shaded area represents the normal range of blood glucose found in patients whose pregnancies were not premature labor in all cases. Initial doses of oral terbuta- complicated by diabetes. The points above represent hypergly­ line ranged from 2.5 mg to 7.5 mg every 3 hours, and cemic values.

The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1993 27 Peterson, Peterson, Tongen, et al Glucose Intolerance and Terbutaline

c o a o Z z

(N ON

IN c y ro ro fN o .£ H |p On NO (N ID

bo-g u C3 .£ > y C t/5

< < < < < s -2 -h i±; z Z Z Z Z U U ,= H B

V 3 uC o% hC-h- V Ph < < + .<<<.< g J ^ £ z z + + z z z + z

aOh yv X H < < < < < , < , o £ -3 z z z z z 1 z 1 g “ H 3 X w bO . £ > , - 3 CL 2 rt ^ NO ON § &S ro (N

tN 6*S £ ; O tN On < w ro

JD U Q W a *1-3 *§ H * d-+f«3

28 The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1993 Glucose Intolerance and Terbutaline Peterson, Peterson, Tongen, et al

B L We next compared average fasting glucose values 0 HI (111 ± 23 mg/dL) for women found to be nondiabetic 0 D by standard glucose testing while receiving terbutaline G 300 with fasting values in previously studied nondiabetic L patients (72 ± 22 mg/dL) who were not in premature U C labor.29 The values for subjects treated with terbutaline 0 20° were found to be significantly higher (P < .001). The overall mean blood glucose values of these women taking terbutaline ranged from 117 to 150 mg/dL before insulin therapy (Table 1). It was also noted that 43% to 83% of the glucose values for these subjects were above the standard range for pregnancy (60 to 120 mg/dL). The self-monitored fasting blood glucose values in these non­ Figure 3. A modal day graph of the blood glucose levels of the same patient as in Figure 2 over a 1-week period following diabetic subjects before insulin administration were com­ discontinuation of terbutaline dterapy. Note the paucity of pared with values for untreated GDM control patients hyperglycemic events. (average fasting blood glucoses of 95 ± 22 mg/dL).29 The fasting blood glucose values for untreated GDM historical control patients were found to be comparable were managed with insulin therapy (Table 1). Three to or lower than fasting blood glucose values for terbu- women who had been classified as nondiabetic were also taline-trcated nondiabctic patients. treated with insulin therapy on the basis of elevated The relationships between glucose patterns and ad­ ambulatory glucose levels. These subjects reported high justment of tocolytic therapy were examined. In one blood glucose levels immediately following initiation of subject (B) who had preexisting hyperglycemia, blood terbutaline treatment. Although the OGTT result for glucose rose immediately upon terbutaline administra­ each of these three women was negative, the ambulatory tion. In all subjects, the drug’s tocolytic effect diminished glucose profiles while receiving terbutaline were inter­ over time, requiring subsequent increases in dosage. Cor­ preted by attending physicians as similar to those seen in responding with this refractory tocolytic effect, a slight the diabetic patients, and thus each patient was managed improvement in glucose control was found. With the as if she had GDM. cessation of terbutaline therapy, there was a reduction in glucose levels and, in several cases, a return to normal Glucose Profiles glyccmia. The ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) and modal day representations of diabetic and nondiabetic women in Method of Delivery and Fetal Outcome pregnancy that were developed during a previous study Eleven births were recorded for the 10 subjects (one were compared with those produced by subjects in this subject gave birth to twins). All deliveries occurred be­ case series.29 Depicted in Figure 1 is the AGP of an tween the 34th and 39th gestational week. Three infants individual who was nondiabctic when screened at 26 were delivered by cesarean section (because of frank weeks (67 mg/dL plasma glucose). The patient devel­ breech presentation (patient C), fetal distress in a patient oped premature labor at 31 weeks, and terbutaline ther­ bleeding from placenta previa (patient I), or failure to apy was started. It was noted that during terbutaline progress (patient D)). Birthweight ranged from 1960 g administration the AGP showed abnormally high blood to 3997 g. Two infants (those of patients C and D) were glucose values throughout the period of treatment when large for gestational age. Three infants (those of patients superimposed on the range of blood glucose levels found B, D, and J) were hypoglycemic in the immediate neo­ in the nondiabetic patient. The modal day graphs for the natal period. same subject during terbutaline therapy and after discon­ tinuation arc shown in Figures 2 and 3. The glucose profile of this patient during terbutaline administration Discussion was found to be consistent with the AGP seen in patients with gestational diabetes. The persistently elevated blood Hyperglycemia associated with a failure to compensate glucose values returned to normal ranges after discontin­ for increased insulin resistance during pregnancy, as well uation of tocolytic therapy and remained normal until as an alteration in insulin secretory patterns, has been the delivery 18 days later. hallmark of gestational diabetes.29 In normal pregnancy,

The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1993 29 Glucose Intolerance and Terbutaline Peterson, Peterson, Tongen, et al

insulin secretion increases as much as threefold above the hyperglycemic effects dissipated with the cessation of the baseline for the nonpregnant state.30 There is also an tocolytic, the relatively small number of cases makes it increase in peripheral insulin resistance, which may pro­ premature to conclude that terbutaline alone was the mote shunting of ingested carbohydrates to the fetus principal factor involved. because of inhibition of maternal glucose utilization. The combined effect of tocolytic-mcdiatcd increased Defects in pancreatic /3-cell secretory patterns found in hepatic glycogenolysis and normal pregnancy-induced non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and insulin resistance may explain, in this case series, why in GDM may preclude compensation for insulin resis­ ambulatory glucose patterns appeared consistent with tance.29 Current diagnostic criteria for GDM are based GDM. Further, when the tocolytic was administered to a on a statistical definition related to the severity of glucose patient whose pregnancy was already complicated by intolerance and the predictability of subsequent GDM, increased doses of insulin were required to rees­ NIDDM.31 tablish normoglycemia. It has been suggested that, as in NIDDM, a genetic Should the nondiabctic or the glucose-intolerant predisposition for developing diabetes is an important woman be treated for premature labor with terbutaline? factor in GDM. Additional factors in GDM that may As already noted, tocolytic therapy must be initiated contribute to hyperglycemia include human placental rapidly to prevent premature birth; therefore, the feasi­ lactogen, progesterone, and other gestational hor­ bility of identifying glucose tolerance levels in all women mones.6’32 Few have considered, however, the introduc­ before initiating therapy is low. Short-term consequences tion of drugs that promote glucose intolerance as an of uncontrolled hyperglycemia are not fully understood. alternative cause of gestational diabetes. This could be In an earlier study of untreated “borderline” hyperglyce­ the case if women given the “diabetogenic” agent were mia, it was shown that the risk o f macrosomia, hypergly­ near the upper percentile of normal carbohydrate toler­ cemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and polycythemia are three- ance, or were experiencing elevated levels of circulating to fivefold greater.28 Maternal risks of toxemia and preec­ endogenous catecholamines or corticostcriods resulting lampsia related to hyperglycemia arc not known outside from the stress of premature labor. When terbutaline is of GDM. It remains unclear whether the infant of a administered to women in premature labor to counter previously nondiabetic mother treated with orally admin­ uterine contractions, the supplemental effect of increased istered terbutaline (resulting in persistent hyperglycemia) glycogenolysis in the liver may further aggravate glucose is at a similar or greater risk of neonatal and chronic intolerance in the previously nondiabetic and gestational complications as compared with the infant of a woman diabetic patient. This perhaps was reflected by the in­ who has GDM in whom hyperglycemia is not pharma­ creased exogenous insulin required to maintain normal cologically induced. pregnant glucose levels in the group of patients treated Clearly, the negative consequences of untreated or with insulin in the current study. One possible explana­ poorly treated premature labor are significant.1-5 Al­ tion is that by increasing hepatic glycogenolysis, terbu- though the case series was limited in size, it raises the taline may induce hyperglycemia, resulting in increased question of the efficacy of establishing glucose tolerance insulin requirements to maintain normal pregnant blood in women started on /3-sympathomimctic drugs. How­ glucose levels. The ensuing hyperinsulincmia may in turn ever, anticipation and treatment of hyperglycemia also result in downregulation of insulin receptors or an in­ raises critical issues. To rapidly achieve euglycemia in crease in postreceptor insulin resistance or both. These pregnancy often requires insulin therapy with daily mon­ mechanisms for glucose intolerance have been described itoring of capillary blood glucose. Larger and more ex­ in gestational diabetes.6 tensive studies are needed to folly elucidate the effect of This case series raises the question as to whether terbutaline on glucose tolerance in pregnancy and to terbutaline sulfate given orally produces maternal hyper­ establish appropriate guidelines for detection, monitor­ glycemia in previously nondiabctic women and whether ing, and treatment of any subsequent hyperglycemia. the resultant ambulatory glucose profiles can be distin­ guished from those of patients with GDM. Interestingly, tachyphylaxis seemed to develop within several days of Acknowledgment

initial terbutaline administration. The development of This study was supported by a grant from the Education and Research uterine myometrium tachyphylaxis appears to be less bund of the United Hospital Foundation, St Paul, Minnesota. marked, as the tocolytic effect at a particular dose level of tci butaline persists longer than the peak hyperglycemic References effect. Desensitization to terbutaline is probably receptor mediated.11 While it was noted that in all patients the 1' ” ucst°n WJ- Prevention and treatment of preterm labor. Am Fam Physician 1989; 40:139-46.

30 The fournal of Family Practice, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1993 Glucose Intolerance and Terbutaline Peterson, Peterson, Tongen, et al

2. Main DM, Main EK. Management of preterm labor and delivery. 17. Mordes D, Kreutner K, Metzger W, Colwell JA. Dangers of In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, eds. Obstetrics: normal intravenous ritodrine in diabetic patients. JAMA 1982; 248: and problem pregnancies. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 973-5. 1986:689-737. 18. Thomas DJB, Gill B. -induced diabetic ketoacidosis. 3. Sinclair JC. Epidemiology of prematurity. Int J Technol Assess BMJ 1977; 2:438. Health Care 1991; 7(Suppl l):2-8. 19. Leslie D, Coats PM. Salbutamol-induced diabetic ketoacidosis. 4. Gutsche BB, Samuels P. Anesthetic considerations in premature BMJ 1977; 2:768. birth. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1990; 28(1) :33—43. 20. Schilthuis MS, Aamoudse JG. Fetal death associated with severe 5. Papiernik E. Proposals for a programmed prevention policy of ritodrine-induced ketoacidosis. Lancet 1980; 1:1145. preterm birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1984; 27:614—35. 21. Angel JL, O’Brien WF, Knuppel RA, Morales WJ, Sims CJ. 6. Chahal P, Hawkins DF. Diabetes and pregnancy. London: But- Carbohydrate intolerance in patients receiving oral . Am terworth 8c Co Ltd, 1989. J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159:762-6. 7. Souney PF, Kaul AF, Osathanondh R. Pharmacotherapy of pre­ 22. Main EK, Main DM, Gabbe SG. Chronic oral terbutaline tocolytic term labor. Clin Pharm 1983; 2:29-44. therapy is associated with maternal glucose intolerance. Am J 8. Caritis SN, Toig G, Heddinger LA, Ashmead G. A double-blind Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157:644-7. study comparing ritodrine and terbutaline in the treatment of 23. Main DM, Main EK, Strong SE, Gabbe SG. The effect of oral preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150:7-14. ritodrine therapy on glucose tolerance in pregnancy. Am J Obstet 9. Huszar G, Naftolin F. The myometrium and uterine cervix in Gynecol 1985; 152:1031-3. normal and preterm labor. N Engl J Med 1984; 311:571-81. 24. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of 10. Roberts J. Current understanding of pharmacologic mechanisms diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Di­ in the prevention of preterm birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1984; abetes 1979; 28:1039. 27:592-605. 25. Mazze RS. Ambulatory Glucose Profile 1.0 [computer program], 11. Lefkowitz RJ. Direct binding studies of adrenergic receptors: Minneapolis: International Diabetes Center, 1988. biochemical, physiologic, and clinical implications. Ann Intern 26. Glucofacts Data Management System [computer program]. Med 1979; 91:450-8. Elkhart Ind: Ames Division, Miles Laboratories, 1986. 12. Spellacy WN, Cruz AC, Buhi WC, Birk SA. The acute effects of 27. Mazze RS, Lucido D, Langer O, Hartmann K, Rodbard D. ritodrine infusion on maternal metabolism: measurements of levels Ambulatory glucose profile: representation of verified self-moni­ of glucose, insulin, glucagon, triglycerides, cholesterol, placental tored blood glucose data. Diabetes Care 1987; 10( 1): 111—7. lactogen, and chorionic gonadotropin. Am J Obstet Gvnecol 28. Langer O, Brustman L, Anyaegbunam A, Mazze RS. The signif­ 1978; 131:637-42. icance of one abnormal OGTT value on adverse outcome in 13. Westgren M, Carlsson C, Lindholm T, Thysell H, Ingemarsson I. pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157:758-63. Continuous maternal glucose measurements and fetal glucose and 29. Buchanan TA. Glucose metabolism during pregnancy: normal insulin levels after administration of terbutaline in term labor. Acta physiology and implications for diabetes mellitus. Isr J Med Sci Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 108(Suppl):63-5. 1991; 27:432-41. 14. Epstein ME, Nicholls E, Stubblefield PG. Neonatal hyperglycemia 30. Buchanan TA, Metzger BE, Freinkci N, Bergman RN. Insulin after beta-sympathomimetic tocolytic therapy. Pediatrics 1979; sensitivity and /3-cell responsiveness to glucose during later preg­ 94:449—53. nancy in lean and moderately obese women with normal glucose 15. Svenningsen NW. Follow-up studies on preterm infants after tolerance or mild gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; maternal /3-receptor agonist treatment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 162(4)4008-14. 1982; 108(Suppl):67-70. 31. Coustan DR. Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Isr J 16. Steel JM, Parboosingh J. Insulin requirements in pregnant diabet­ Med Sci 1991; 27:503-9. ics with premature labor controlled by ritodrine. BMJ 1977; 32. Freinkel N. The Banting lecture 1980. Of pregnancy and progeny. 1:880. Diabetes 1980; 29:1023-35.

The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1993 31