When Is a Risk Not a Risk? by Dr David Hillson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

7468/IPM Newsletter No.1/Ire 3/14/05 11:40 AM Page 6 Keith's G4:Desktop Folder:7468/IPMA Newsletter No.1/Ire: THE WORLD LEADER IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION When is a Risk not a Risk? by Dr David Hillson One of the most common healthy), project objectives (including delivering Distinguishing risks failings in the risk management on time and within budget), and corporate from non-risks process is for the risk business objectives (such as to increase profit Another common challenge in risk identification identification step to identify and market share). Wherever objectives are is to avoid confusion between causes of risk, things which are not risks. defined, there will be risks to their successful genuine risks, and the effects of risks. The PMI® Clearly if this early stage of the achievement. This is illustrated for projects in PMBoK® Guide says that “A risk may have one risk process fails, subsequent Figure 1. or more causes and, if it occurs, one or more steps will be doomed and risk impacts”. In the most simple case, one cause management cannot be The link also helps us to identify risks at different leads to a single risk which in turn could have just effective. It is therefore levels, based on the hierarchy of objectives that one effect (see Figure 2), though of course reality essential to ensure that risk exists in an organisation. For example strategic is considerably more complex. How do these identification identifies risks. risks are uncertainties that could affect strategic three differ? This paper addresses two key objectives, technical risks might affect technical requirements for effective risk objectives, reputation risks would affect • Causes are definite events or sets of identification. The first is a clear reputation, and so on. circumstances which exist in the project or understanding of what is meant by the term “risk”. The second is to be able to distinguish risks FIGURE 1: Risk arises from the effect of uncertainty on objectives from non-risks, particularly from their causes and effects. All projects contain risk, arising from interactions between • OBJECTIVES ... What must happen • UNCERTAINTY ... What might happen Clearly defining risk Many people when they try to identify risks get TIME confused between risk and uncertainty. Risk is not the same as uncertainty, so how are the two related? The key is to realise that risk can only be uncertainty uncertainty defined in relation to objectives. The simplest definition of risk is “uncertainty that matters”, and it matters because it can affect one or more objectives. Risk cannot exist in a vacuum, and we uncertainty QUALITY/ need to define what is “at risk”, i.e. what COST PERFORMANCE objectives would be affected if the risk occurred. A more complete definition of risk would therefore be “an uncertainty that if it occurs could One other question arises from the concept of its environment, and which give rise to affect one or more objectives”. This recognises risk as “uncertainty that could affect objectives” : uncertainty. Examples include the the fact that there are other uncertainties that are what sort of effect might occur? In addition to requirement to implement a project in a irrelevant in terms of objectives, and these should those uncertainties which if they occur would developing country, the need to use an be excluded from the risk process. For example if make it more difficult to achieve objectives (also unproven new technology, the lack of skilled we are conducting an IT project in India, the known as threats), there are also uncertain personnel, or the fact that the organisation uncertainty about whether it might be raining events which if they occur would help us achieve has never done a similar project before. tomorrow in London is irrelevant – who cares? our objectives (i.e. opportunities). When Causes themselves are not uncertain since But if our project involves redeveloping the identifying risks, we need to look for uncertainties they are facts or requirements, so they Queen’s gardens at Buckingham Palace, the with upside as well as those with downside. should not be managed through the risk possibility of rain in London is not just an management process. uncertainty – it matters. In one case the rain is Effective risk management requires identification • Risks are uncertainties which, if they occur, merely an irrelevant uncertainty, but in the other of real risks, which are “uncertainties which if would affect achievement of the objectives it is a risk. they occur will have a positive or negative effect either negatively (threats) or positively on one or more objectives”. Linking risks with (opportunities). Examples include the Linking risk with objectives makes it clear that objectives will ensure that the risk identification possibility that planned productivity targets every facet of life is risky. Everything we do aims process focuses on those uncertainties that might not be met, interest or exchange rates to achieve objectives of some sort, including matter, rather than being distracted and diverted might fluctuate, the chance that client personal objectives (for example to be happy and by irrelevant uncertainties. expectations may be misunderstood, or 6 7468/IPM Newsletter No.1/Ire 3/14/05 11:40 AM Page 7 Keith's G4:Desktop Folder:7468/IPMA Newsletter No.1/Ire: THE WORLD LEADER IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION whether a contractor might deliver earlier criteria (contingent possibility = effect on than planned. These uncertainties should be objective).” References and managed proactively through the risk • “We have to outsource production (cause); we further reading management process. may be able to learn new practices from our Association for Project Management. 2004 • Effects are unplanned variations from selected partner (risk), leading to increased “Project Risk Analysis & Management objectives, either positive or negative, which productivity and profitability (effect).” (PRAM) Guide” (second edition). Published would arise as a result of risks occurring. by APM Publishing, High Wycombe, Bucks Examples include being early for a milestone, The use of risk metalanguage should ensure that UK. ISBN 1-903494-12-5 exceeding the authorised budget, or failing to risk identification actually identifies risks, distinct meet contractually agreed performance from causes or effects. Without this discipline, risk Hillson D. A. 2000. “Project risks – targets. Effects are contingent events, identification can produce a mixed list containing identifying causes, risks and effects”. PM unplanned potential future variations which risks and non-risks, leading to confusion and Network, Volume 14 Number 9, pages will not occur unless risks happen. As effects distraction later in the risk process. 48-51 do not yet exist, and indeed they may never exist, they cannot be managed through the Conclusion Hillson D. A. 2002. “What is risk? Towards risk management process. Risks must be identified if they are to be a common definition”. InfoRM, journal of Including causes or effects in the list of identified successfully managed. But risk is not the same as the UK Institute of Risk Management, April risks obscures genuine risks, which may not uncertainty, and risks must be separated from their 2002, pages 11-12 receive the appropriate degree of attention they causes and their effects. We must be clear about deserve. So how can we clearly separate risks what we are trying to identify. Hillson D. A. 2003. “Effective opportunity from their causes and effects? One way is to use management for projects : Exploiting risk metalanguage (a formal description with Effective risk identification is an essential positive risk.” Published by Marcel Dekker, required elements) to provide a three-part prerequisite for a successful risk process, and this New York, US. ISBN 0-8247-4808-5 structured “risk statement”, as follows : “As a requires both a clear understanding of what “risk” Project Management Institute. 2004. “A Guide to the Project Management Body of FIGURE 2: Cause, Risk and Effect Knowledge (PMBoK®)”, Third Edition. Project Management Institute, CAUSE Definite fact about project or its environment Philadelphia, US. RISK Uncertainty that could affect project if it occurs About the author Dr David Hillson PMP FAPM is an international risk EFFECT Contingent effect of risk on project objective(s) management consultant, and Director of Risk Doctor & Partners result of <definite cause>, <uncertain event> means as well as what is does not mean. This (www.risk- may occur, which would lead to <effect on paper has addressed both these elements, by doctor.com). He is a popular conference speaker objective(s)>.” clarifying the fundamental link between risk and and award-winning author on risk. He is objectives (a risk is “any uncertainty which if it recognised internationally as a leading thinker Examples include the following : occurs would have a positive or negative effect on and practitioner in the risk field, and has made • “As a result of using novel hardware (a one or more objectives”), and by describing how several innovative contributions to improving risk definite requirement), unexpected system risk metalanguage can distinguish between cause, management. integration errors may occur (an uncertain risk and effect (“Because of a cause, a risk might risk), which would lead to overspend on the occur, which would lead to an effect”). Applying David is an active member of the global Project project (an effect on the budget objective).” these simple approaches will ensure that risk Management Institute (PMI®) and received the • “Because our organisation has never done a identification identifies risks, allowing the rest of 2002 PMI Distinguished Contribution Award for his project like this before (fact = cause), we the risk process to proceed on a sound basis. Only work in developing risk management over many might misunderstand the customer's then can we be sure that the risk management years. He is also a Fellow of the UK Association for requirement (uncertainty = risk), and our process is addressing those uncertainties that can Project Management (APM) and a Fellow of the UK solution would not meet the performance affect our projects and businesses.
Recommended publications
  • Integrating Ecological Risk Assessment and Economic Analysis in Watersheds: a Conceptual Approach and Three Case Studies

    Integrating Ecological Risk Assessment and Economic Analysis in Watersheds: a Conceptual Approach and Three Case Studies

    EPA/600/R-03/140R September 2003 Integrating Ecological Risk Assessment and Economic Analysis in Watersheds: A Conceptual Approach and Three Case Studies National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH DISCLAIMER This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ABSTRACT This document reports on a program of research to investigate the integration of ecological risk assessment (ERA) and economics, with an emphasis on the watershed as the scale for analysis. In 1993, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency initiated watershed ERA (W- ERA) in five watersheds to evaluate the feasibility and utility of this approach. In 1999, economic case studies were funded in conjunction with three of those W-ERAs: the Big Darby Creek watershed in central Ohio; the Clinch Valley (Clinch and Powell River watersheds) in southwestern Virginia and northeastern Tennessee; and the central Platte River floodplain in Nebraska. The ecological settings, and the analytical approaches used, differed among the three locations, but each study introduced economists to the ERA process and required the interpretation of ecological risks in economic terms. A workshop was held in Cincinnati, OH in 2001 to review progress on those studies, to discuss environmental problems involving other watershed settings, and to discuss the ideal characteristics of a generalized approach for conducting studies of this type. Based on the workshop results, a conceptual approach for the integration of ERA and economic analysis in watersheds was developed.
  • A Measure of Risk Tolerance Based on Economic Theory

    A Measure of Risk Tolerance Based on Economic Theory

    A Measure Of Risk Tolerance Based On Economic Theory Sherman D. Hanna1, Michael S. Gutter 2 and Jessie X. Fan3 Self-reported risk tolerance is a measurement of an individual's willingness to accept risk, making it a valuable tool for financial planners and researchers alike. Prior subjective risk tolerance measures have lacked a rigorous connection to economic theory. This study presents an improved measurement of subjective risk tolerance based on economic theory and discusses its link to relative risk aversion. Results from a web-based survey are presented and compared with results from previous studies using other risk tolerance measurements. The new measure allows for a wider possible range of risk tolerance to be obtained, with important implications for short-term investing. Key words: Risk tolerance, Risk aversion, Economic model Malkiel (1996, p. 401) suggested that the risk an to describe some preliminary patterns of risk tolerance investor should be willing to take or tolerate is related to based on the measure. The results suggest that there is the househ old situation, lifecycle stage, and subjective a wide variation of risk tolerance in people, but no factors. Risk tolerance is commonly used by financial systematic patterns related to gender or age have been planners, and is discussed in financial planning found. textbooks. For instance, Mittra (1995, p. 396) discussed the idea that risk tolerance measurement is usually not Literature Review precise. Most tests use a subjective measure of both There are at least four methods of measuring risk emotional and financial ability of an investor to tolerance: askin g about investment choices, asking a withstand losses.
  • Exposure and Vulnerability

    Exposure and Vulnerability

    Determinants of Risk: 2 Exposure and Vulnerability Coordinating Lead Authors: Omar-Dario Cardona (Colombia), Maarten K. van Aalst (Netherlands) Lead Authors: Jörn Birkmann (Germany), Maureen Fordham (UK), Glenn McGregor (New Zealand), Rosa Perez (Philippines), Roger S. Pulwarty (USA), E. Lisa F. Schipper (Sweden), Bach Tan Sinh (Vietnam) Review Editors: Henri Décamps (France), Mark Keim (USA) Contributing Authors: Ian Davis (UK), Kristie L. Ebi (USA), Allan Lavell (Costa Rica), Reinhard Mechler (Germany), Virginia Murray (UK), Mark Pelling (UK), Jürgen Pohl (Germany), Anthony-Oliver Smith (USA), Frank Thomalla (Australia) This chapter should be cited as: Cardona, O.D., M.K. van Aalst, J. Birkmann, M. Fordham, G. McGregor, R. Perez, R.S. Pulwarty, E.L.F. Schipper, and B.T. Sinh, 2012: Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. In: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation [Field, C.B., V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, pp. 65-108. 65 Determinants of Risk: Exposure and Vulnerability Chapter 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................67 2.1. Introduction and Scope..............................................................................................................69
  • Anthrozoology and Sharks, Looking at How Human-Shark Interactions Have Shaped Human Life Over Time

    Anthrozoology and Sharks, Looking at How Human-Shark Interactions Have Shaped Human Life Over Time

    Anthrozoology and Public Perception: Humans and Great White Sharks (Carchardon carcharias) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA Jessica O’Toole A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Marine Affairs University of Washington 2020 Committee: Marc L. Miller, Chair Vincent F. Gallucci Program Authorized to Offer Degree School of Marine and Environmental Affairs © Copywrite 2020 Jessica O’Toole 2 University of Washington Abstract Anthrozoology and Public Perception: Humans and Great White Sharks (Carchardon carcharias) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA Jessica O’Toole Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Dr. Marc L. Miller School of Marine and Environmental Affairs Anthrozoology is a relatively new field of study in the world of academia. This discipline, which includes researchers ranging from social studies to natural sciences, examines human-animal interactions. Understanding what affect these interactions have on a person’s perception of a species could be used to create better conservation strategies and policies. This thesis uses a mixed qualitative methodology to examine the public perception of great white sharks on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. While the area has a history of shark interactions, a shark related death in 2018 forced many people to re-evaluate how they view sharks. Not only did people express both positive and negative perceptions of the animals but they also discussed how the attack caused them to change their behavior in and around the ocean. Residents also acknowledged that the sharks were not the only problem living in the ocean. They often blame seals for the shark attacks, while also claiming they are a threat to the fishing industry.
  • Environment and Natural Resource Management POLICY

    Environment and Natural Resource Management POLICY

    Environment and natural resource management POLICY Resilient livelihoods through the sustainable use of natural assets Enabling poor rural people to overcome poverty IFAD ENRM core principles 10 Reduce Productive and IFAD’s environmental resilient livelihoods footprint Increase and ecosystems smallholder access to Promote role 9 green finance 8 of women and indigenous peoples Promote livelihood 7 diversification Improve 6 governance of natural assets Engage in value chains 5 that drive green growth Build 4 smallholder resilience to risk Promote climate-smart 3 rural Recognize development 2 values of natural assets Scaled-up 1 investment in sustainable agriculture Scaled-up investment in Improved governance of natural assets multiple-benefit approaches for for poor rural people by strengthening land tenure sustainable agricultural intensification and community-led empowerment Recognition and greater awareness Livelihood diversification to reduce vulnerability of the economic, social and cultural and build resilience for sustainable value of natural assets natural resource management ‘Climate-smart’ approaches Equality and empowerment for women to rural development and indigenous peoples in managing natural resources Greater attention to risk and resilience Increased access in order to manage environment- and by poor rural communities natural-resource-related shocks to environment and climate finance Engagement in value chains Environmental commitment through to drive green growth changing its own behaviour A full description of the core principles begins on page 28. Environment and natural resource management Policy Resilient livelihoods through the sustainable use of natural assets Enabling poor rural people to overcome poverty Minor amendments have been included in this document to reflect comments received during Board deliberations and to incorporate the latest data available.
  • How Corporate Boards Can Oversee Environmental, Social and Governance (Esg) Issues

    How Corporate Boards Can Oversee Environmental, Social and Governance (Esg) Issues

    Running the Risk HOW CORPORATE BOARDS CAN OVERSEE ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) ISSUES November 2019 Acknowledgements Rebecca Henderson, John and Natty McArthur University Professor, Harvard Business School; board Report Authors: member, Amgen Inc.; board member, IDEXX Laboratories Veena Ramani, senior program director, Robert Herz, board member, Morgan Stanley; capital markets systems program, Ceres and board member, Federal National Mortgage Association Hannah Saltman, manager, governance, Ceres. (Fannie Mae); board member, Workiva Inc.; board member, Paxos Trust Company; board member, This project is generously funded by the Gordon Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and Betty Moore Foundation. Foundation; former chairman of the board, Financial We would also like to thank our colleagues at Ceres Accounting Standards Board (FASB); former member, who provided very useful assistance with this project, International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) including Blair Bateson, Jim Coburn, Margaret Fleming, Dan Hesse, board member, PNC Financial; Barbara Grady, George Grattan, Cynthia McHale, board member, Akamai; former president and Brian Sant, Sara Sciammacco, Alex Wilson and chief executive officer, Sprint Corporation Elise Van Heuven. Robert Hirth, senior managing director, Protiviti; former Project Contributors chairman, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO); co-vice chair, Ceres would like to thank the following people for Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) contributing their valuable time and thoughtful feedback to this project and informing our recommendations. Steven Hoch, partner, Brown Advisory; former board The views expressed in this paper are Ceres’ alone and member, Nestle SA do not necessarily reflect those of these contributors. Sheila Hooda, chief executive officer, president & founder, Carol Browner, former administrator, U.S.
  • U.S. EPA. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment

    U.S. EPA. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment

    EPA/630/R-92/001 February 1992 FRAMEWORK FOR ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Risk Assessment Forum U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 DISCLAIMER This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ii CONTENTS Acknowledgments . ..............vi Foreword . ............ vii Preface . ............ix Contributors and Reviewers . ............. x Executive Summary . ............ xiv 1. INTRODUCTION . .......... 1 1.1. Purpose and Scope of the Framework Report . ... 1 1.2. Intended Audience . .... 2 1.3. Definition and Applications of Ecological Risk Assessment ..................... 2 l. 4. Ecological Risk Assessment Framework .................................... 2 1.5. The Importance of Professional Judgment ................................... 6 1.6. Organization .......................................................... 6 2. PROBLEM FORMULATION ....................................................... 9 2.1. Discussion Between the Risk Assessor and Risk Manager (Planning) ............. 9 2.2. Stressor Characteristics, Ecosystem Potentially at Risk, and Ecological Effects ..... 9 2.2.1. Stressor Characteristics ................................................. 11 2.2.2. Ecosystem Potentially at Risk ............................................ 11 2.2.3. Ecological Effects ..................................................... 12 2.3. Endpoint Selection
  • COSO) Oversight Representative COSO Chair John J

    COSO) Oversight Representative COSO Chair John J

    Enterprise Risk Management — Integrated Framework Executive Summary September 2004 Copyright © 2004 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. All rights reserved. You are hereby authorized to download and distribute unlimited copies of this Executive Summary PDF document, for internal use by you and your firm. You may not remove any copyright or trademark notices, such as the ©, TM, or ® symbols, from the downloaded copy. For any form of commercial exploitation distribution, you must request copyright permission as follows: The current procedure for requesting AICPA permission is to first display our Website homepage on the Internet at www.aicpa.org, then click on the "privacy policies and copyright information" hyperlink at the bottom of the page. Next, click on the resulting copyright menu link to COPYRIGHT PERMISSION REQUEST FORM, fill in all relevant sections of the form online, and click on the SUBMIT button at the bottom of the page. A permission fee will be charged for th e requested reproduction privileges. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Oversight Representative COSO Chair John J. Flaherty American Accounting Association Larry E. Rittenberg American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Alan W. Anderson Financial Executives International John P. Jessup Nicholas S. Cyprus Institute of Management Accountants Frank C. Minter Dennis L. Neider The Institute of Internal Auditors William G. Bishop, III David A. Richards Project Advisory Council to COSO Guidance Tony Maki, Chair James W. DeLoach John P. Jessup Partner Managing Director Vice President and Treasurer Moss Adams LLP Protiviti Inc. E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company Mark S.
  • Is Modern Portfolio Theory Still Modern?

    Is Modern Portfolio Theory Still Modern?

    A reprinted article from July/August 2020 Is Modern Portfolio Theory Still Modern? By Anthony B. Davidow, CIMA® © 2020 Investments & Wealth Institute®. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. JULY AUGUST FEATURE 2020 Is Modern Portfolio Theory Still Modern? By Anthony B. Davidow, CIMA® odern portfolio theory (MPT) This article addresses some of the identifies a few of the more popular assumes that investors are limitations of MPT and evaluates alter- approaches and the corresponding Mrisk averse, meaning that native techniques for allocating capital. limitations. For MPT and PMPT (post- given two portfolios that offer the same Specifically, it will delve into the follow- modern portfolio theory), the biggest expected return, investors will prefer ing issues: limitation is with respect to the robust- the less risky portfolio. The implication ness and accuracy of the data used to is that a rational investor will not invest A What are the various asset allocation optimize. Using only long-term histori- in a portfolio if a second portfolio exists approaches? cal averages of the underlying asset with a more favorable profile of risk A What are the limitations of each classes is a flawed approach.Long -term versus expected return.1 approach? data should certainly be considered—but A How should advisors evolve their what if the future isn’t like the past? MPT has a number of inherent limita- approaches? tions. Investors aren’t always rational— A What is the appeal of a goals-based The long-term historical annual return and they don’t always select the right approach? of the S&P 500 has been 10.3 percent portfolio.
  • Current Status of Animal-Assisted Interventions in Scientific Literature: a Critical Comment on Their Internal Validity

    Current Status of Animal-Assisted Interventions in Scientific Literature: a Critical Comment on Their Internal Validity

    animals Opinion Current Status of Animal-Assisted Interventions in Scientific Literature: A Critical Comment on Their Internal Validity Javier López-Cepero Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Sevilla, Camilo José Cela s/n, 41010 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected]; Tel.: +34-954-556-831 Received: 20 May 2020; Accepted: 4 June 2020; Published: 5 June 2020 Simple Summary: Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) have been receiving ever-increasing attention from both practitioners (including psychologists, educators, social workers, and physicians) and clients alike. However, despite this interest, the literature does not provide an unanimous support for including dogs, horses, cats, or other animals in interventions. The present work analyzes whether or not this lack of support could be understood as the result of inconsistencies and/or biases present in the literature, analyzing the definition of AAIs, the role of animals in interventions, the relationship among AAIs and the way humans relate to non-human animals, and the way in which researchers study these phenomena. The present comment provides some clues on how to improve the development of the field, including the following: giving more prominence to cultural, anthrozoological aspects of AAIs; considering AAIs as modalities of well-known interventions, avoiding their representation as “alternative”, “new”, or “groundbreaking”; and making changes to the study and intervention of designs, thus making it easier to demonstrate the impact of human–animal interactions on improving outcomes. Abstract: Many meta-analyses and systematic reviews have tried to assess the efficacy of animal-assisted interventions (AAIs), reaching inconsistent conclusions. The present work posits a critical exploration of the current literature, using some recent meta-analyses to exemplify the presence of unattended threats.
  • Modern Portfolio Theory

    Modern Portfolio Theory

    Modern portfolio theory “Portfolio analysis” redirects here. For theorems about where Rp is the return on the port- the mean-variance efficient frontier, see Mutual fund folio, Ri is the return on asset i and separation theorem. For non-mean-variance portfolio wi is the weighting of component analysis, see Marginal conditional stochastic dominance. asset i (that is, the proportion of as- set “i” in the portfolio). Modern portfolio theory (MPT), or mean-variance • Portfolio return variance: analysis, is a mathematical framework for assembling a P σ2 = w2σ2 + portfolio of assets such that the expected return is maxi- Pp P i i i w w σ σ ρ , mized for a given level of risk, defined as variance. Its key i j=6 i i j i j ij insight is that an asset’s risk and return should not be as- where σ is the (sample) standard sessed by itself, but by how it contributes to a portfolio’s deviation of the periodic returns on overall risk and return. an asset, and ρij is the correlation coefficient between the returns on Economist Harry Markowitz introduced MPT in a 1952 [1] assets i and j. Alternatively the ex- essay, for which he was later awarded a Nobel Prize in pression can be written as: economics. P P 2 σp = i j wiwjσiσjρij , where ρij = 1 for i = j , or P P 1 Mathematical model 2 σp = i j wiwjσij , where σij = σiσjρij is the (sam- 1.1 Risk and expected return ple) covariance of the periodic re- turns on the two assets, or alterna- MPT assumes that investors are risk averse, meaning that tively denoted as σ(i; j) , covij or given two portfolios that offer the same expected return, cov(i; j) .
  • Developing and Promoting Agroecological Innovations Within Country Program Strategies to Address Agroecosystem Resilience in Production Landscapes: a Guide

    Developing and Promoting Agroecological Innovations Within Country Program Strategies to Address Agroecosystem Resilience in Production Landscapes: a Guide

    Developing and promoting agroecological innovations within country program strategies to address agroecosystem resilience in production landscapes: a guide Miguel A. Altieri University of California, Berkeley Empowered lives. Resilient nations. The Small Grants Programme The Small Grants Programme (SGP) is a corporate programme of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) implemented by the United Nations Development Programme(UNDP) since 1992. SGP grantmaking in over 125 countries promotes community-based innovation, capacity development, and empowerment through sustainable development projects of local civil society organizations with special consideration for indigenous peoples, women, and youth. In particular, SGP supports biodiversity conservation, climate change mitigation and adaptation, prevention of land degradation, protection of international waters, and reduction of the impact of chemicals, while generating sustainable livelihoods. One of the strategic initiatives of the Sixth Operational Phase of the Small Grants Programme is Climate-Smart Innovative Agro-ecology. This initiative will target geographical areas that show declining productivity as a result of human induced land degrading practices and the impact of climate change by working in buffer zones of identified critical ecosystems, as well as in forest corridors. COMDEKS The “Community Development and Knowledge Management for the Satoyama Initiative (COMDEKS)” supports local community activities to maintain and, where necessary, rebuild socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes (SEPLS), and to collect and disseminate knowledge and experiences from successful on-the-ground actions for dissemination and adaptation to other smallholder organizations in other landscapes and regions of the world. Landscape strategies are developed with four outcomes, one of which addresses agroecosystem resilience, while aiming at improving food security and stabilizing and improving ecosystem services.