The Global Risks Report 2021 16Th Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Global Risks Report 2021 16Th Edition The Global Risks Report 2021 16th Edition INSIGHT REPORT In partnership with Marsh McLennan, SK Group and Zurich Insurance Group The Global Risks Report 2021 16th Edition Strategic Partners Marsh McLennan SK Group Zurich Insurance Group Academic Advisers National University of Singapore Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, University of Pennsylvania The Global Risks Report 2021, 16 th Edition, is published by the World Economic Forum. The information in this report, or on which this report is based, has been obtained from sources that the authors believe to be reliable and accurate. However, it has not been independently verified and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information obtained from third parties. In addition, the statements in this report may provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to a historical fact or a current fact. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are not exhaustive. The companies contributing to this report operate in a continually changing environment and new risks emerge continually. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements. The companies contributing to this report undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update any statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise and they shall in no event be liable for any loss or damage arising in connection with the use of the information in this report. World Economic Forum® Cover artwork: Patrik Svensson © 2021 – All rights reserved. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise without the prior permission of the World Economic Forum. ISBN: 978-2-940631-24-7 The report and an interactive data platform are available at http://wef.ch/risks2021 Contents Preface CHAPTER 1 Hindsight: Reflections By Klaus Schwab and Global Risks 2021: on Responses to Saadia Zahidi 5 Fractured Future 15 COVID-19 72 CHAPTER 2 Executive Postscript: Foresight Summary 7 Error 404: Barriers to on Frontier Risks 84 Digital Inclusivity 29 Global Risks CHAPTER 3 Appendices Perception Survey Pandemials: Youth Appendix A: Descriptions 2020 Results 10 in an Age of Lost of Global Risks 2021 86 Opportunity 39 Appendix B: Global Risks Perception Survey and Methodology 90 CHAPTER 4 Middle Power Morass: Navigating Global Divides 52 Acknowledgements 94 CHAPTER 5 Imperfect Markets: A Disorderly Industrial Shakeout 62 The Global Risks Report 2021 4 Preface Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman Saadia Zahidi, Managing Director In 2006, the Global Risks Report sounded the alarm safety nets and economic structures beyond capacity. on pandemics and other health-related risks. That Whether the gaps can be narrowed will depend on the year, the report warned that a “lethal flu, its spread actions taken in the wake of COVID-19 to rebuild with a facilitated by global travel patterns and uncontained view towards an inclusive and accessible future. Inaction by insufficient warning mechanisms, would present on economic inequalities and societal divisiveness may an acute threat.” Impacts would include “severe further stall action on climate change—still an existential impairment of travel, tourism and other service threat to humanity. industries, as well as manufacturing and retail supply chains” while “global trade, investor risk appetites Growing societal fragmentation—manifested and consumption demand” could see longer-term through persistent and emerging risks to human harms. A year later, the report presented a pandemic health, rising unemployment, widening digital scenario that illustrated, among other effects, the divides, and youth disillusionment—can have severe amplifying role of “infodemics” in exacerbating consequences in an era of compounded economic, the core risk. Subsequent editions have stressed environmental, geopolitical and technological risks. the need for global collaboration in the face of The gap between the “haves” and “have-nots” antimicrobial resistance (8th edition, 2013), the Ebola will widen further if technology access and ability crisis (11th edition, 2016), biological threats (14th remain disparate. The world’s youth have faced edition, 2019), and overstretched health systems (15th exceptional pressures in the past decade and are edition, 2020), among other topics. particularly vulnerable to missing out altogether on the opportunities of the next. In 2020, the risk of a global pandemic became reality. As governments, businesses and societies survey For business, the economic, technological and the damage inflicted over the last year, strengthening reputational pressures of the present moment risk strategic foresight is now more important than a disorderly shakeout, threatening to create a large ever. With the world more attuned to risk, there is cohort of workers and companies that are left behind an opportunity to leverage attention and find more in the markets of the future. Governments, too, effective ways to identify and communicate risk to must balance between managing the pandemic and decision-makers. economic contraction, while at the same time creating new opportunities that are fundamental to social It is in this context that we publish the 16th edition of cohesion and the viability of their populations. Most the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report. critically, if environmental considerations—the top Our analysis centres on the risks and consequences long-term risks once again—are not confronted in the of widening inequalities and societal fragmentation. In short term, environmental degradation will intersect some cases, disparities in health outcomes, technology, with societal fragmentation to bring about dramatic or workforce opportunities are the direct result of the consequences. If managed poorly, these disruptions dynamics the pandemic created. In others, already- will hamper the ability of policy-makers and other present societal divisions have widened, straining weak leaders to act on different areas of risk. The Global Risks Report 2021 5 The foundation of the report continues to be our Complementing the Global Risks Practice, the World annual Global Risks Perception Survey, completed by Economic Forum hosts major platforms dedicated over 650 members of the World Economic Forum’s to action on building a new economy and society, diverse leadership communities. In addition, the long- mobilizing for the climate, managing and disseminating standing and deeply committed Global Risks Advisory Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies, shaping Board shapes the direction of this report from its industry transformations, and enhancing global earliest stages, and provides insight throughout the and regional cooperation. These platforms, and the writing process. Over the last year, we have also leaders, networks and organizations they host, apply expanded our efforts around risk and resilience the findings of this report in their efforts to tackle the for decision-makers and for the broader global world’s greatest challenges—managing risks, building community. A new Global Future Council on Frontier resilience and leveraging new opportunities. Such an Risks capitalizes on its diverse and forward-looking integrated approach has never been more critical than membership to inject fresh thinking into efforts to at present, as the world moves beyond managing the understand and mitigate future risks and to amplify pandemic to resetting our current systems and building weak signals of coming disruptions in the decades back better economies and societies with people and ahead. Their ideas are featured in the postscript on the planet at the centre of our efforts. Frontier Risks. A new Chief Risk Officers community brings together leaders in this role in the private sector and major institutions to share methods and views to collectively enhance capability. We are ever grateful to our long-standing partners in the report’s development, Marsh McLennan and Zurich Insurance Group. We welcomed a new partner this year, SK Group, to whom we owe a debt of gratitude for the valuable inputs provided. We are also grateful to our academic partners: the National University of Singapore, the Oxford Martin School at the University of Oxford, and the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center at the University of Pennsylvania. Insights from a wide set of experts from the public and private sectors can also be found in these pages. The Global Risks Report 2021 6 Executive Summary The immediate human and economic cost of COVID-19 youth disillusionment, digital inequality, economic is severe. It threatens to scale back years of progress stagnation, human-made environmental damage, on reducing poverty and inequality and to further erosion of societal cohesion, and terrorist attacks. weaken social cohesion and global cooperation. Job losses, a widening digital divide, disrupted social Economic risks feature prominently in the 3-5 year interactions, and abrupt shifts in markets could lead timeframe, including asset bubbles, price instability, to dire consequences and lost opportunities for large commodity shocks and debt crises; followed by parts of the global population. The ramifications—in geopolitical
Recommended publications
  • Congratulations
    CONGRATULATIONS High Honors Graduation Year: 2024 IREIDYS Y. ALVAREZ DELEON FAVOUR T. BELLO KIMBERLY BENCOSME LIZMARIELYS BERREONDO MARIELA L. DE LEON TUYEN C. DINH ALONDRA J. GARCIA JANNELLY J. GUARDADO KYARA E. LOPEZ JOHNANGEL LORA YULISSA MINAYA TEJADA HECTOR J. MUNOZ LOPEZ LISSANIA E. PICHARDO DE LA CRUZ ALBERT J. PORTUHONDO SITARA M. QAMBER ALI MARIA E. RAMOS SABAN WINDERSON RODRIGUEZ HIRALDO WINIFER RODRIGUEZ HIRALDO FRANCHELLE TAVAREZ SAURAB TIWARI ARIEL M. VETH-LY Graduation Year: 2025 YANDRY M. GRIFFIN DIAZ ELAINA M. MORILLO ROKAYA M. SAHWAN CHRISTINE N. YANG Graduation Year: 2026 QOWIYYAH O. AGBAJE DANNY J. GARCIA DE LA CRUZ BETHANY M. JIMENEZ VASQUEZ AMARA R. KEO KIARA M. MORENTE AMARA E. REIS ASHLEY D. SANTOS DE LA CRUZ NAIYAN SOSA DURAN ALEJANDRA TORNES MORALES JAYDEN J. URIZAR ROSALES Honors Graduation Year: 2024 JOSELYN E. ALONZO XAVIEA S. BROWN PRECIOUS F. BUWEE WILBERT CABRAL GARCIA KALIYAN N. CHHUN JUANA CHIJAL JESSICA A. CHOCOJ CHALI DOMINGO COLAJ COLAJ MARIALYS I. CRUZ ASHLEY M. DE LA CRUZ ARIAS ARDENIS J. DEL ROSARIO GIANA N. DICENZO BRIANNA M. DOMINGUEZ FRIAS SOMALY DONG OSMERY ESTRELLA VARGAS ERICA O. FELIX HERRERA EDUARDO J. GIL ALFONSO BRYAN M. GIRON LUX VILMA GODINEZ SEBASTIANA JERONIMO ALONZO HENRY L. JOHNSON IV TATYANA JOHNSON KRISSBEILY MARTE FERREIRA GEARA D. MATOS DIEGO A. NAVAS ORTES OLIVIER NGABONZIZA MANUELA NUNEZ HERNANDEZ AMBER K. O'BRIEN NICERLIS OLIVO NUNEZ ANDERSON E. ORTEGA-LOPEZ YENEDELI E. PENA GUZMAN FRANCISCO PEREZ RAMOS RENE G. REYES EMILY A. RINDA BETHZY M. ROBLES URIZAR CRISTIAN D. ROSALES HERNANDEZ JASON S. RUSH JAMES D. SEFFENS III GENESIS SOSA ALEXANDER SUAREZ LIZZETTE M.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation & Research Literature: the State of Knowledge on BJA
    Evaluation & Research Literature: The State of Knowledge on BJA-Funded Programs March 27, 2015 Overview The Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) is a leader in developing and implementing evidence-based criminal justice policy and practice. BJA’s mission is to provide leadership in services and grant administration and criminal justice policy development to support local, state, and Tribal justice strategies to achieve safer communities. This is accomplished in many criminal justice topic areas, including adjudication, corrections, counter-terrorism, crime prevention, justice information sharing, law enforcement, justice and mental health, substance abuse, and Tribal justice. Under each topic area, BJA funds numerous programs and initiatives at the Tribal, local, and state level. In partnership with the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), other Federal partners, and many other research partners, many of these programs have been evaluated, while others have not. The intent of the following report is to assess the state of knowledge as determined by data collection, research, and evaluation of and related to BJA- funded programs. This report is a resource that can be a reference for both evaluation and research literature on many BJA programs. It also identifies programs and practices for which U.S. Department of Justice resources have played a critical role in generating innovative programs and sound practices. This report identifies programs and practices with a solid foundation of evidence, as well as those that may benefit from further research and evaluation. Program evaluation is a systematic, objective process for determining the success of a policy or program. Evaluations assess whether and to what extent the program is achieving its goals and objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Fireworks, Chinese New Year and the COVID-19 Lockdown on Air Pollution and Public Attitudes
    Special Issue on COVID-19 Aerosol Drivers, Impacts and Mitigation (VII) Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 20: 2318–2331, 2020 ISSN: 1680-8584 print / 2071-1409 online Publisher: Taiwan Association for Aerosol Research https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.06.0299 Effect of Fireworks, Chinese New Year and the COVID-19 Lockdown on Air Pollution and Public Attitudes Peter Brimblecombe1,2, Yonghang Lai3* 1 Department of Marine Environment and Engineering, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan 2 Aerosol Science Research Center, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan 3 School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong ABSTRACT Concentrations of primary air pollutants are driven by emissions and weather patterns, which control their production and dispersion. The early months of the year see the celebratory use of fireworks, a week-long public holiday in China, but in 2020 overlapped in Hubei Province with lockdowns, some of > 70 days duration. The urban lockdowns enforced to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic give a chance to explore the effect of rapid changes in societal activities on air pollution, with a public willing to leave views on social media and show a continuing concern about the return of pollution problems after COVID-19 restrictions are lifted. Fireworks typically give rise to sharp peaks in PM2.5 concentrations, though the magnitude of these peaks in both Wuhan and Beijing has decreased under tighter regulation in recent years, along with general reductions in pollutant emissions. Firework smoke is now most evident in smaller outlying cities and towns. The holiday effect, a reduction in pollutant concentrations when normal work activities are curtailed, is only apparent for NO2 in the holiday week in Wuhan (2015–2020), but not Beijing.
    [Show full text]
  • Apocalypse Now? Initial Lessons from the Covid-19 Pandemic for the Governance of Existential and Global Catastrophic Risks
    journal of international humanitarian legal studies 11 (2020) 295-310 brill.com/ihls Apocalypse Now? Initial Lessons from the Covid-19 Pandemic for the Governance of Existential and Global Catastrophic Risks Hin-Yan Liu, Kristian Lauta and Matthijs Maas Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract This paper explores the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic through the framework of exis- tential risks – a class of extreme risks that threaten the entire future of humanity. In doing so, we tease out three lessons: (1) possible reasons underlying the limits and shortfalls of international law, international institutions and other actors which Covid-19 has revealed, and what they reveal about the resilience or fragility of institu- tional frameworks in the face of existential risks; (2) using Covid-19 to test and refine our prior ‘Boring Apocalypses’ model for understanding the interplay of hazards, vul- nerabilities and exposures in facilitating a particular disaster, or magnifying its effects; and (3) to extrapolate some possible futures for existential risk scholarship and governance. Keywords Covid-19 – pandemics – existential risks – global catastrophic risks – boring apocalypses 1 Introduction: Our First ‘Brush’ with Existential Risk? All too suddenly, yesterday’s ‘impossibilities’ have turned into today’s ‘condi- tions’. The impossible has already happened, and quickly. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, both directly and as manifested through the far-reaching global societal responses to it, signal a jarring departure away from even the © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/18781527-01102004Downloaded from Brill.com09/27/2021 12:13:00AM via free access <UN> 296 Liu, Lauta and Maas recent past, and suggest that our futures will be profoundly different in its af- termath.
    [Show full text]
  • TOUR DE FER 20 Colour: Greens of the Stone Age / Weight: 14.80Kg
    TOUR DE FER 20 Colour: Greens Of The Stone Age / Weight: 14.80Kg SPECS Frame Reynolds 725 Heat-Treated Chromoly FEATURES Fork Genesis Full Chromoly - Reynolds 725 CrMo tubeset. Headset PT-1770 EC34 Upper / EC34 Lower - Shimano 3x10 speed drivetrain. Hanger Integraded - Shimano dynamo hub with B&M lights. COMPONENTS - Schwalbe Marathon touring tyres. Handlebars Genesis Alloy 18mm Rise, 8 Deg Backsweep, XS = 580mm, S/M = 600mm, L/XL = 620mm - Mudguards included. Stem Genesis Alloy, 31.8mm, -6 Deg, 100mm - Tubus rear rack, Atranvelo front rack. Grips/Tape Genesis Vexgel Saddle Genesis Adventure Seatpost Genesis Alloy 27.2mm XS/S/M = 350mm, L/XL = 400mm Pedals NW-99k With Cage DRIVE TRAIN Shifters Shimano Deore SL-M6000 3x10spd GEOMETRY XS S M L XL Rear Derailleur Shimano Deore RD-M6000-SGS Seat Tube 450 480 510 530 570 Front Derailleur Shimano Deore FD-T6000-L-3 Top Tube 533 547 578 604 636 Chainset Shimano FC-T611 44/32/24t, 170mm Frame Reach 365 375 395 415 435 BB Shimano BB-ES300 Frame Stack 566 580 599 618 637 Chain KMC X10 Head Tube 125 140 160 180 200 Cassette Shimano CS-HG500 11-34t Head Angle 71 71 71 71 71 BRAKES Seat Angle 73.5 73.5 73 73 72.5 Brakes Promax DSK-717RA Chainstay 455 455 455 455 455 Brake Levers Promax XL-91 BB Drop 75 75 75 75 75 Rotors Promax DT-160G, 160mm, 6 bolt Wheelbase 1041 1056 1083 1109 1136 WHEELS & TYRES Fork Offset 55 55 55 55 55 Rims Sun Ringle Rhyno Lite Standover 758 778 799 807 843 Hubs Shimano Front - DH-3D37 Dynamo Hub / Rear - FH-M4050 Stem 100 100 100 100 100 Spokes Steel 14g Handlebar 580 600 600 620 620 Tyres Schwalbe Marathon, 700 x 37c Crankarm 170 170 170 170 170 * The image above is for illustration purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 GV80 Getting Started Guide
    GETTING STARTED GUIDE GENESIS GV80 GETTING STARTED GUIDE AUDIO, CONNECTIVITY, AND NAVIGATION Thank you for joining the Genesis family. This easy-to-follow guide will show you how to use various Genesis GV80 features and how to adjust their settings to your preferences. We hope you enjoy the distinctive luxury of a customized and convenient ownership experience. TABLE OF CONTENTS PHONE PROJECTION 3 PHONE PAIRING 4 CUSTOM BUTTON 6 MAKING A CALL 7 NAVIGATION 10 DYNAMIC VOICE Recognition 13 Dual VOICE Recognition 14 MAP DISPLAYS 15 Advanced DRIVER Assistance SYstems 17 Main menu PHONE PROJECTION Android AutoTM and Apple CarPlay® allow you to access the most commonly used smartphone features, including calling, navigation, text messaging, and playing music all from your driver’s seat. 1. ‘Connect’ a USB data cable from your phone to the vehicle’s USB port.* Android Auto APPLE CARPLAY 2. ‘Allow permission’ from your phone to connect to your vehicle. Please note that your phone must be unlocked. Android Auto APPLE CARPLAY 3. Enjoy using the applications displayed on your vehicle’s multimedia screen. Android Auto APPLE CARPLAY Note Android Auto users will be prompted to view a tutorial. Select your option and proceed. *USB data port will typically be located in or near the front in-dash console. Check your vehicle’s owner’s manual for specific location. Data cable for iOS device is required for Apple CarPlay. OEM data cables are recommended. Apple CarPlay is a registered trademark of Apple Inc. Android Auto is a trademark of Google LLC. 3 ONLINE RESOURCES AND INFORMATION AT MYGENESIS.COM Main menu PHONE PAIRING 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the New Global Elite
    The Rise of the New Global Elite F. Scott Fitzgerald was right when he declared the rich different from you and me. But today’s super-rich are also different from yesterday’s: more hardworking and meritocratic, but less connected to the nations that granted them opportunity—and the countrymen they are leaving ever further behind. By Chrystia Freeland http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/01/the-rise-of-the-new-global-elite/8343/1/ IMAGE CREDIT: STEPHEN WEBSTER/WONDERFUL MACHINE IF YOU HAPPENED to be watching NBC on the first Sunday morning in August last summer, you would have seen something curious. There, on the set of Meet the Press, the host, David Gregory, was interviewing a guest who made a forceful case that the U.S. economy had become “very distorted.” In the wake of the recession, this guest explained, high-income individuals, large banks, and major corporations had experienced a “significant recovery”; the rest of the economy, by contrast—including small businesses and “a very significant amount of the labor force”—was stuck and still struggling. What we were seeing, he argued, was not a single economy at all, but rather “fundamentally two separate types of economy,” increasingly distinct and divergent. This diagnosis, though alarming, was hardly unique: drawing attention to the divide between the wealthy and everyone else has long been standard fare on the left. (The idea of “two Americas” was a central theme of John Edwards’s 2004 and 2008 presidential runs.) What made the argument striking in this instance was that it was being offered by none other than the former five-term Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan: iconic libertarian, preeminent defender of the free market, and (at least until recently) the nation’s foremost devotee of Ayn Rand.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE John William Mcarthur Brookings Institution Global Economy and Development Program 1775 Massachusetts Ave NW Wa
    CURRICULUM VITAE John William McArthur Brookings Institution Global Economy and Development Program 1775 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington, DC 20036 USA t: +1-202-797-6029 e: [email protected] CITIZENSHIP Canada EDUCATION 2009 University of Oxford Doctor of Philosophy in Economics 2000 University of Oxford Master of Philosophy in Economics 1998 Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government Master of Public Policy with concentration in International Trade and Finance 1996 University of British Columbia Bachelor of Arts (1st Class Honours) in Political Science with International Relations PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS 2012 - The Brookings Institution Inaugural Director, Center for Sustainable Development (2020 - ) Senior Fellow, Global Economy and Development (2014 - ) Visiting Fellow, Global Economy and Development (2013 - 2014) Nonresident Senior Fellow, Global Economy and Development (2012 - 2013) 2012 - United Nations Foundation Senior Advisor on Sustainable Development (2016 - ) Senior Fellow (2012 – 2015) 2012 - 2014 Fung Global Institute (Hong Kong) Senior Fellow (2013 - 2014) Senior Advisor (Fall 2012) 2008 - 2011 Millennium Promise Alliance Chief Executive Officer 1 2008 - 2011 Columbia University, School of International and Public Affairs Adjunct Associate Professor (Fall 2011) Adjunct Assistant Professor (Spring 2008 - Spring 2011) 2002 - 2011 Earth Institute at Columbia University Senior Advisor to the Director (2008-2011) Policy Director (2006-2008) Associate Director (2002-2005) 2007 United Nations Development
    [Show full text]
  • Unmet Promises: Continued Violence and Neglect in California's Division
    UNMET PROMISES Continued Violence & Neglect in California’s Division of Juvenile Justice Maureen Washburn | Renee Menart | February 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 7 History 9 Youth Population 10 A. Increased spending amid a shrinking system 10 B. Transitional age population 12 C. Disparate confinement of youth of color 13 D. Geographic disparities 13 E. Youth offenses vary 13 F. Large facilities and overcrowded living units 15 Facility Operations 16 A. Aging facilities in remote areas 16 B. Prison-like conditions 18 C. Youth lack safety and privacy in living spaces 19 D. Poorly-maintained structures 20 Staffing 21 A. Emphasis on corrections experience 21 B. Training focuses on security over treatment 22 C. Staffing levels on living units risk violence 23 D. Staff shortages and transitions 24 E. Lack of staff collaboration 25 Violence 26 A. Increasing violence 26 B. Gang influence and segregation 32 C. Extended isolation 33 D. Prevalence of contraband 35 E. Lack of privacy and vulnerability to sexual abuse 36 F. Staff abuse and misconduct 38 G. Code of silence among staff and youth 42 H. Deficiencies in the behavior management system 43 Intake & Unit Assignment 46 A. Danger during intake 46 B. Medical discontinuity during intake 47 C. Flaws in assessment and case planning 47 D. Segregation during facility assignment 48 E. Arbitrary unit assignment 49 Medical Care & Mental Health 51 A. Injuries to youth 51 B. Barriers to receiving medical attention 53 C. Gender-responsive health care 54 D. Increase in suicide attempts 55 E. Mental health care focuses on acute needs 55 Programming 59 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Research on Catastrophic and Existential Risk
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Working together to face humanity's greatest threats: Introduction to The Future of Research in Catastrophic and Existential Risk AUTHORS Currie, AM; Ó hÉigeartaigh, S JOURNAL Futures DEPOSITED IN ORE 06 February 2019 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/35764 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Working together to face humanity’s greatest threats: Introduction to The Future of Research on Catastrophic and Existential Risk. Adrian Currie & Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh Penultimate Version, forthcoming in Futures Acknowledgements We would like to thank the authors of the papers in the special issue, as well as the referees who provided such constructive and useful feedback. We are grateful to the team at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk who organized the first Cambridge Conference on Catastrophic Risk where many of the papers collected here were originally presented, and whose multi-disciplinary expertise was invaluable for making this special issue a reality. We’d like to thank Emma Bates, Simon Beard and Haydn Belfield for feedback on drafts. Ted Fuller, Futures’ Editor-in-Chief also provided invaluable guidance throughout. The Conference, and a number of the publications in this issue, were made possible through the support of a grant from the Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF); the conference was also supported by a supplementary grant from the Future of Life Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Hospital Lockdown Guidance
    Hospital Lockdown: A Framework for NHSScotland Strategic Guidance for NHSScotland June 2010 Hospital Lockdown: A Framework for NHSScotland Strategic Guidance for NHSScotland Contents Page 1. Introduction..........................................................................................5 2. Best Practice and relevant Legislation and Regulation ...................7 2.1 Best Practice............................................................................7 2.8 Relevant legislation and regulation ..........................................8 3. Lockdown Definition ..........................................................................9 3.1 Definition of site/building lockdown...........................................9 3.4 Partial lockdown .......................................................................9 3.5 Portable lockdown ..................................................................10 3.6 Progressive/incremental lockdown .........................................10 3.8 Full lockdown..........................................................................11 4. Developing a lockdown profile.........................................................12 4.3 Needs Analysis ......................................................................13 4.4 Critical asset profile................................................................14 4.9 Risk Management ..................................................................14 4.10 Threat and hazard assessment..............................................14 4.13 Lockdown threat
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Divisions on Covid-19: Not What They Might Seem Tropical Medicine, London, UK It Is Not Whether We Should Open up Or Lock Down
    VIEWS AND REVIEWS BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.m4024 on 19 October 2020. Downloaded from 1 London School of Hygiene and Scientific divisions on covid-19: not what they might seem Tropical Medicine, London, UK It is not whether we should open up or lock down. Rather, it’s how we can break the chain of 2 Carlo F Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy, transmission, argue Martin McKee and David Stuckler Bocconi University. Milan, Italy Martin McKee, 1 David Stuckler2 [email protected] Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4024 A new theme has emerged in the media discourse on shared with many of those who are portrayed as being http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4024 covid-19 in the UK. We are told that the scientific in opposition to them. It is difficult to imagine that Published: 19 October 2020 community is divided, between those who advocate anyone would consider the damage to education, to stringent lockdowns even at the cost of widespread incomes, and to mental and physical health as collateral damage to mental and physical health, and acceptable.9 Yet, it is also unacceptable to allow the those who propose returning rapidly to life as normal, virus to proceed unchecked even if there was some allowing the virus to spread through the population.1 way of protecting the “vulnerable.” Yet this is a false dichotomy. Most experts who If these two statements are accepted, then it suggests support restrictions do so as a last resort, only to that many have been asking the wrong question.
    [Show full text]