Anthrozoology and Sharks, Looking at How Human-Shark Interactions Have Shaped Human Life Over Time

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anthrozoology and Sharks, Looking at How Human-Shark Interactions Have Shaped Human Life Over Time Anthrozoology and Public Perception: Humans and Great White Sharks (Carchardon carcharias) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA Jessica O’Toole A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Marine Affairs University of Washington 2020 Committee: Marc L. Miller, Chair Vincent F. Gallucci Program Authorized to Offer Degree School of Marine and Environmental Affairs © Copywrite 2020 Jessica O’Toole 2 University of Washington Abstract Anthrozoology and Public Perception: Humans and Great White Sharks (Carchardon carcharias) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA Jessica O’Toole Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Dr. Marc L. Miller School of Marine and Environmental Affairs Anthrozoology is a relatively new field of study in the world of academia. This discipline, which includes researchers ranging from social studies to natural sciences, examines human-animal interactions. Understanding what affect these interactions have on a person’s perception of a species could be used to create better conservation strategies and policies. This thesis uses a mixed qualitative methodology to examine the public perception of great white sharks on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. While the area has a history of shark interactions, a shark related death in 2018 forced many people to re-evaluate how they view sharks. Not only did people express both positive and negative perceptions of the animals but they also discussed how the attack caused them to change their behavior in and around the ocean. Residents also acknowledged that the sharks were not the only problem living in the ocean. They often blame seals for the shark attacks, while also claiming they are a threat to the fishing industry. The results of this study can be used to determine future strategies and policies as Cape Cod continues to navigate the increasing shark population. 3 Acknowledgments I would like to thank Professor Marc L. Miller, Professor Vincent F. Gallucci, and Manjari Misra for all their guidance and assistance on this thesis. I really appreciate your help and insight as I navigated this new field of anthrozoology. Also, thank you to all my family, friends, and SMEA cohort and community who have supported me the last two years. You are all amazing! I especially want to thank my parents, Donna and Patrick, and my brother Bryan for constantly pushing me achieve my goals and supporting me every step of the way. 4 Table of Contents Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 3 Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…. 5 List of Figures …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 8 1. Chapter One: Anthrozoology …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 9 1.1. History of Anthrozoology …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 1.2. Definitions …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10 1.3. Human-Animal Studies ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 11 1.4. Interactions, Relationships, and Bonds ………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 1.5. Crossing Boundaries …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 14 1.6. Paul Shepard …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 14 1.7. Chapter Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………... 16 2. Chapter Two: Biology and Management of Sharks ………………………………………………………………………………... 17 2.1. Biology ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17 2.2. Distribution ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24 2.3. Management ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 24 2.4. Great White Sharks ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 2.5. Chapter Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 32 3. Chapter Three: Anthrozoology of Sharks ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 33 3.1 Sharks as Gods …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..… 33 3.2 Sharks as Food ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…. 36 3.3 Sharks as Symbols ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..… 37 3.4 Sharks as Art ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 38 3.5 Sharks as Entertainment ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……. 39 3.6 Sharks as Monsters ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……. 40 3.7 Chapter Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..… 43 5 4 Chapter Four: Cape Cod and Sharks ……………………………………………………………………………………………..……..… 45 4.1 The Cape …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 45 4.2 Sharks of Cape Cod ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………. 49 4.3 The 2018 Attack ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………. 53 4.4 Reactions …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………… 54 4.5 Chapter Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 57 5 Chapter Five: Methodology ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..….. 58 5.1 Research Questions …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..… 58 5.2 Mixed Methods Data Collection ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 59 6 Chapter Six: Analysis and Results ………………………………………………………………………….……………………………….. 65 7 Chapter Seven: Discussion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 79 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 83 References ……………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………… 85 Appendix I. Disciplines Represented in Anthrozoology Literature ………………………………………………………………….. 95 II. Data Collection Methodology ……………………………………………………………………………………………………... 98 III. Autoethnographic Note ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….. 108 6 List of Tables and Figures Tables: Table 4.1 Past Winners of the Monster Shark Tournament ………………………………….……………………………………….. 51 Table 5.1 Elite Interviewees …………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………... 59 Table 5.2 Semi-structured Interviewees ………………………..…………….……………………………………………………….………. 61 Table 5.3 Unobtrusive Observation Locations ………………………………..………………………………..…………………………… 61 Table 5.4 Secondary Source Information Pieces ……………………..……………………………………………………………….….… 62 Appendix 1.1 Disciplines Represented in Anthrozoös …………………………………………………………….……………………… 95 Figures: Figure 2.1 Shark Diagram ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….. 18 Figure 3.1 The Shark Callers of Kontu ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… 36 Figure 3.2 Life of Sharks Comic ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………….. 40 Figure 4.1 Map of Cape Cod …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… 46 Figure 4.2 Scenes from the Monster Shark Tournament …………………………………………………………………………….... 50 Figure 4.3 New Shark Mitigation Strategies ……………………………………………………………………………………………….…. 56 Figure 4.4 Sharktivity App ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……. 57 Figure 5.1 Map of Unobtrusive Observation Sites ……………………………………………………………………………………..….. 62 Figure 6.1 Facebook Comments on a Shark Article ……………………………………………………………………………………..… 67 7 Introduction The field of marine and environmental affairs is a broad discipline concerning issues in marine and environmental policy and management. This includes such topics as marine and coastal law, fisheries resource management, environmental justice, and many more. Recently, another area of study has emerged in the field of marine and environmental affairs, known as anthrozoology. Anthrozoology is the study of human-animal interactions and while relatively new in academia, it has actually been around for centuries. Since its official debut in the academic world in the 1970s, anthrozoology has continued to grow in both the social and natural sciences. The study’s insight into human behavior makes it a valuable tool in creating conservation strategies and policy decisions. Anthrozoology can also help researchers understand how interactions with animals influence peoples’ perceptions of the species. An example of this can be seen with the great white sharks off the coast of Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Like other coastal communities in the United States, the Cape has a long history of shark interactions. These interactions have been both direct and indirect, ranging from great whites biting paddleboards to shark themed art festivals. In September 2018, a bodyboarder off the shore of Newcomb Hollow Beach on Cape Cod was bitten by a great white shark. Unfortunately he died of his injuries, becoming the first person to die of a shark attack on Cape Cod in over 80 years. Given this history of interactions and the recent shark attack, this thesis looks to understand what the public perception of sharks is on Cape Cod by asking three research questions: How are sharks understood by people, how do sharks influence people’s behavior, and what other sharks issues are salient in people’s minds? The Plan of This Thesis This thesis examines the field of human-animal interactions and the perceptions of sharks on Cape Cod. Chapter 1 introduces the field of anthrozoology, examining its history, definitions, and role in academia. Chapter 2 looks at the biology and management of sharks with a focus on the great white. Chapter 3 dives into the world of anthrozoology and sharks, looking at how human-shark interactions have shaped human life over time. In Chapter 4 the history of Cape Cod is discussed as well as the area’s past interactions with sharks, focusing once again on the great white. Chapter 5 remarks on the mixed qualitative method approach that was used to collect the data for this thesis. Research results are presented in Chapter 6, while the significance of
Recommended publications
  • THE POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE and the REMEDIATION of LAND Emma Lees* Keywords: Contamination, Environmental Liability, Polluter Pa
    THE POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE AND THE REMEDIATION OF LAND Emma Lees* Keywords: contamination, environmental liability, polluter pays principle Abstract The Environmental Liability Directive attempts to provide a harmonising framework for liability for environmental damage within the European Union on the basis of the polluter pays principle. This article considers legislation in place in the Member States which sit alongside provisions based on the ELD. It shows that such regimes rely on different models for liability, which require, in turn, fundamentally different understandings as to how the polluter pays principle can work as a principle of liability. It considers provisions in place in Denmark, the United Kingdom, the Walloon Region, the Netherlands, and Germany. The differences between these systems are not differences of degree, nor are they mere technicalities, rather they represent a significant challenge not only to the goals of the ELD, but to the principles underpinning it. By undertaking a comparative analysis of these systems, it becomes clear not only that the ELD sits uncomfortably with these “parallel” provisions, but also that this discomfort is not only one of overlapping and complex legislative provisions, but rather one of underlying justification for liability. ‘The purpose of the Environmental Liability Directive (“ELD”) is to establish a framework of environmental liability, based on the ‘polluter-pays’ principle, to prevent and remedy environmental damage’ (European Commission, 2006, p. 1; A. Waite, 2006, p. 67). This goal is threatened by the variation in Member State liability for remediation of land which sits alongside the ELD in the Member States. When the legislation in Member States relating to contaminated land is examined, it becomes clear that the Member States prefer to extend liability beyond the liability of the polluter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Stronger Regulation of Environmental Marketing
    University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship Summer 2020 Greenwashing No More: The Case for Stronger Regulation of Environmental Marketing Robin M. Rotman Chloe J. Gossett Hope D. Goldman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/facpubs Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Marketing Law Commons 08. ALR 72.3_ROTMAN (ARTICLE) (DO NOT DELETE) 8/22/2020 11:30 PM GREENWASHING NO MORE: THE CASE FOR STRONGER REGULATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MARKETING ROBIN M. ROTMAN*, CHLOE J. GOSSETT**, AND HOPE D. GOLDMAN*** Fraudulent and deceptive environmental claims in marketing (sometimes called “greenwashing”) are a persistent problem in the United States, despite nearly thirty years of efforts by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to prevent it. This Essay focuses on a recent trend in greenwashing—fraudulent “organic” claims for nonagricultural products, such as home goods and personal care products. We offer three recommendations. First, we suggest ways that the FTC can strengthen its oversight of “organic” claims for nonagricultural products and improve coordination with the USDA. Second, we argue for inclusion of guidelines for “organic” claims in the next revision of the FTC’s Guidelines for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims (often referred to as the “Green Guides”), which the FTC is scheduled to revise in 2022. Finally, we assert that the FTC should formalize the Green Guides as binding regulations, rather than their current form as nonbinding interpretive guidance, as the USDA has done for the National Organic Program (NOP) regulations. This Essay concludes that more robust regulatory oversight of “organic” claims, together with efforts by the FTC to prevent other forms of greenwashing, will ultimately bolster demand for sustainable products and incentivize manufacturers to innovate to meet this demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Becoming and Remaining Vegetarian
    Wang, Yahong (2020) Vegetarians in modern Beijing: food, identity and body techniques in everyday experience. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/77857/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Vegetarians in modern Beijing: Food, identity and body techniques in everyday experience Yahong Wang B.A., M.A. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and Political Sciences College of Social Sciences University of Glasgow March 2019 1 Abstract This study investigates how self-defined vegetarians in modern Beijing construct their identity through everyday experience in the hope that it may contribute to a better understanding of the development of individuality and self-identity in Chinese society in a post-traditional order, and also contribute to understanding the development of the vegetarian movement in a non-‘Western’ context. It is perhaps the first scholarly attempt to study the vegetarian community in China that does not treat it as an Oriental phenomenon isolated from any outside influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Syllabus Animal Studies: an Introduction ANTH S-1625 Harvard Summer School 2016 Dr
    2016.6.10 draft Course Syllabus Animal Studies: An Introduction ANTH S-1625 Harvard Summer School 2016 Dr. Paul Waldau Course Description This course traces the history and shape of academic efforts to study nonhuman animals. Animal studies scholars explore such questions as, how do contemporary Western societies characterize the differences between humans and non-human animals? What ethical debates surround the use of animals in scientific research or the use of animals for food? How different are other cultures’ views of nonhuman animals from the views that now prevail in the United States and other early twenty-first century industrialized societies? What assumptions in educational systems have fostered the study of nonhuman animals, and what assumptions of specific educational systems have hampered such study? Class sessions are discussion-based, and students undertake group work, significant writing, and an individual presentation. In addition, note carefully each of the Learning Objectives listed below. We will discuss these objectives regularly through significant writing, group-based discussion and individual presentations that explore the interdisciplinary implications of weaving together the humanities with sciences (both social and natural). There are no prerequisites for this course. Required Readings and Course Materials • Waldau, Paul 2013. Animal Studies: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press • Additional Course Materials will be specified, and most of them will be available online or in .pdf format at the
    [Show full text]
  • Anth Rozoo Logy
    Anth rozoo logy TIlE NE\V SCIENCE OF HU\IAN-ANIi\IAL I N I ER ACTIONS Our failure to study our relationships with other animals has occurred for many reasons.. .. Much of it can be boiled down to two rather unattractive human qualities: arrogance and ignorance. —CLIFTON FLYNN The thirty-minute drive from the Kansas City airport to the conference hotel was much more interesting than the three-hour flight from North Carolina. I had flow n in for the annual meeting of the International Soci— ety of Anthro7oologv. I found myself sharing a ride with a woman named Layla Esposito, a social psychologist who tells me she recentk completed her Phi) dissertation on bullying among middle school children. Puziled. I ask her wh she was attending a meeting on the relationships between people and animals. She tells me that she is a program director at the i\a tional Institute of Child Health and Human Development. She is at the conference to let researchers know about a new federal grant program that will fund research on the effects that animals ha’e on human health and well-being. The money is coming from the National Institutes of Health SOME WE LOVE, SOME WE HATE, SOME WE EAT ANTHROZOOLOGY (NIH) and Mars, the corporate giant that makes Snickers for me and human-animal interactions is that for many’ of Tempting Tuna Treats for my cat, Tilly. NIFI is particularly interested them the topic seems triv ial. This attitude is wrong-headed, Understanding the psychology in the impact of pets on children: Is pet therapy an effective treatment lying our under attitudes and behaviors toward for autism? other species is ‘What role does oxytocin (the so-called love hormone) play in several reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • What's the Difference Between the B.A. and B.S. Degree In
    What’s the Difference Between the B.A. and B.S. Degree in ES? 8.1.20 If you’re thinking about pursuing Environmental Studies (ES) at UC Santa Barbara the first important decision you have to make is choosing which degree to pursue, the Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) or Bachelor of Science (B.S.) in Environmental Studies. While both majors are similar in design and stress the importance of understanding the complex interrelationships between the humanities, social sciences, and natural science disciplines, having two degree options allows students maximum flexibility to choose a major that best fits their environmental interests and goals. In this document we provide a detailed comparison of the academic requirements of the B.A. and B.S. major so one can understand the differences and can make an educated decision. Given your decision will also be based on what you want to do after graduation we thought it might be helpful to also highlight just a few example career paths each degree might lead to. Just remember, no matter which major you choose, your decision should be based on what you believe will ultimately make you happy. Simply put, the B.A. degree in ES is the more interdisciplinary major, requiring a swath of introductory courses in the humanities, social, physical, and natural sciences. It stresses the importance of comprehending basic social, cultural, and scientific theories and understanding how they interact with one another and play an important part of every environmental issue. While this degree will make one science literate, the degree offers maximum flexibility to select ES electives and outside concentration courses from just about every academic discipline at UCSB, including: arts, policy, culture, languages, humanities, and economics to name just a few.
    [Show full text]
  • How Scary Are the Mental Health Risks of Vegetarianism? Harold Herzog, Animal Studies Repository
    The Animal Studies Repository From the SelectedWorks of Harold Herzog, Ph.D. December 15, 2015 How Scary Are the Mental Health Risks of Vegetarianism? Harold Herzog, Animal Studies Repository Available at: https://works.bepress.com/harold-herzog/84/ Hal Herzog, Ph.D., Animals and Us How Scary Are the Mental Health Risks of Vegetarianism? How strong is the link between vegetarianism and mental illness? Posted Dec 15, 2015 A headline in Women’s Health Magazine recently caught my attention: “The Scary Mental Health Risks of Going Meatless.” The headline made it sound like replacing the bacon and prime rib in your diet with tofu and seitan will make you mentally ill. I have previously written about the link between vegetarianism and eating disorders. But I’ve never argued that giving up animal flesh causes emotional problems, so I decided to check out the major study the headline was based on. What I found illustrates why you should not get your science news from flashy headlines and the problem of link-think in anthrozoology (the study of human-animal relationships). The claim that going veg can make you crazy was based on a 2012 study which appeared in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. The research team, led by German psychologist Johannes Michalak, reanalyzed data from a 2002 epidemiological study that examined the physical and mental health of a large randomly selected sample of German adults. A few studies have linked vegetarianism to poor mental health and one study found vegetarians were psychologically better off than meat eaters.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES/SCIENCE What Can I Do with This Degree?
    ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES/SCIENCE What can I do with this degree? AREAS EMPLOYERS STRATEGIES PLANNING Air Quality Federal, state, regional, and local government Get on planning boards, commissions, and Aviation Corporations committees. Building/Zoning Consulting firms Have a planning specialty (transportation, water Land-Use Banks resources, air quality, etc.). Consulting Real estate development companies Master communication, mediation and writing skills. Recreation Law firms Network in the community and get to know "who's Transportation Architectural firms who" in your specialty area. Water Resources Market research companies Develop a strong scientific or technical background. Colleges and universities Diversify your knowledge base. For example, in Nonprofit groups areas of law, economics, politics, historical preservation, or architecture. ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION Federal, state, and local government Master public speaking skills. Teaching Public and private elementary, middle, and high Learn certification/licensure requirements for teach- Journalism schools ing public K-12 schools. Tourism Two-year community colleges Develop creative hands-on strategies for teaching/ Law Regulation Four-year institutions learning. Compliance Corporations Publish articles in newsletters or newspapers. Political Action/Lobbying Consulting firms Learn environmental laws and regulations. Media Join professional associations and environmental Nonprofit organizations groups as ways to network. Political Action Committees Become active in environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Rcguha's Deep Ecology
    R.C.Guha’s Deep Ecology The respected radical journalist Kirkpatrick sale recently celebrated “the passion of a new and growing movement that has become disenchanted with the environmental establishment. Decrying the narrowly economic goals of mainstream environmentalism, this new movement aims at nothing less than a philosophical and cultural revolution in human attitudes toward nature. Ramchandra Guha develop a critique of deep ecology from the perspective of a sympathetic outsider. Ramchandra Guha’s treatment of deep ecology is primarily historical and sociological, rather than philosophical, in nature. He makes two main arguments : first, that deep ecology is uniquely American. Second, that the social consequences of putting deep ecology into practice on a worldwide basis are very grave indeed. The defining characteristics of deep ecology are fourfold. First, deep ecology argues that the environmental movement must shift from an “anthropocentric” to a “bio-centric” perspective. The anthropocentric------ bio-centric distinction is accepted as axiomatic by deep ecologists, it structures their discourse, and much of the present discussions remains mired within it. The second characteristic of deep ecology is its focus on the preservation of unsploilt wilderness and the restoration of degraded areas to a more pristine condition – to the relative neglect of other issues on the environmental agenda. Historically, it represents a playing out of the preservationist and utilitarian dichotomy that has plagued American environmentalism since the turn of the century. Morally, it is an imperative that follows from the bio-centric perspective ; other species of plants and animals, and nature itself ,have an intrinsic right to exist. And finally, the preservation of wilderness also turns on a scientific argument – viz.; the value of biological diversity in stabilizing ecological regimes and in retaining a gene pool for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Egan, Michael. "Subaltern Environmentalism in the United States: a Historiographic Review." Environment and History 8, No
    The White Horse Press Full citation: Egan, Michael. "Subaltern Environmentalism in the United States: A Historiographic Review." Environment and History 8, no. 1 (February 2002): 21–41. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/3107. Rights: All rights reserved. © The White Horse Press 2002. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this article may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publishers. For further information please see http://www.whpress.co.uk. Subaltern Environmentalism in the United States: A Historiographic Review MICHAEL EGAN1 Department of History Washington State University Pullman WA 99164-4030, USA Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT When a group of people is faced with both social and environmental subordina- tion, they are the victims of environmental injustice. This subordination is manifest in the disproportionate siting of environmental hazards in poor or minority communities and also in the inequitable distribution of ecological resources, both of which perpetuate the marginalisation of subaltern groups. At the heart of the environmental justice movement is a fight for the empowerment of subaltern groups, heretofore excluded from environmental decision-making. In recognising that the environmental health of their living spaces and families is critical to exacting any kind of improvement of their socioeconomic condi- tions, subaltern groups have added a dynamic new dimension to their social struggles. This counter-hegemonic struggle for ecological democracy is one of the fastest growing social movements in contemporary society, and requires the attention of environmental historians to situate it within the broader context of the history of environmentalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Natural Resources; Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Career Cluster
    Statewide Program of Study: Environmental and Natural Resources; Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Career Cluster Principles of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Level 1 Wildlife, Fisheries, and Ecology Management/Lab Forestry and Woodland Ecosystems/Lab Level 2 Range Ecology Management/Lab Energy and Natural Resources Technology/Lab Level 3 Advanced Energy and Natural Resource/Lab Practicum in Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Level 4 Project-Based Research Scientific Research and Design MASTER’S/ Median Annual HIGH SCHOOL/ DOCTORAL Occupations Wage Openings % Growth INDUSTRY CERTIFICATE/ ASSOCIATE’S BACHELOR’S PROFESSIONAL Environmental $53,352 101 32% CERTIFICATION LICENSE* DEGREE DEGREE DEGREE Engineering Technicians Wastewater Board Certified Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Engineers $86,757 288 25% Collections, Class Environmental Science Science Science 1 Engineer - Environmental Science $40,268 508 17% Hazardous Waste and Protection Management Technicians, Including Health Environmental Scientists $77,896 644 24% Water Operators, Certified Water Environmental Environmental/ Environmental/ Class D Technologist Studies Environmental Environmental and Specialists, Including Health Health Health Engineering Engineering Zoologists and Wildlife $67,309 45 32% OSHA Hazardous Certified Wildlife, Fish, Wildlife, Fish, Wildlife, Fish, and Biologists Waste Operations Environmental and and Woodlands Woodlands and Emergency Scientist Woodlands Science and Science and Response Science and Management Management Management WORK BASED LEARNING AND EXPANDED Certified in Public Environmental Natural Fishing and Health Engineering Resources Law Fisheries Science LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES Technology/ Enforcement and Management Work Based Learning Environmental and Protective Exploration Activities: Activities: Technology Services Attend summer leadership events Intern at a waste treatment plant Additional industry-based certification information is available on Texas FFA FFA Supervised Agriculture Experience the TEA CTE website.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Studies
    ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Richard Van Buskirk, Chair; Deke Gundersen The Environmental Studies Department (www.pacificu.edu/as/enviro/) in the College of Arts and Sciences provides students with an education that takes full advantage of Pacific University's liberal arts curriculum. In this program, students and faculty have opportunities to pursue interests that span a wide range of disciplines. In addition to the two full-time faculty members in the department, Environmental Studies offers the expertise of faculty affiliated with the program who are based in the disciplines of biology, chemistry, political science, economics, history, art, sociology, anthropology, philosophy and literature. This results in a wide range of opportunities to investigate environmental problems that cross traditional boundaries. Students in Environmental Studies can choose to apply their knowledge through research opportunities in unique nearby surroundings such as the coniferous forest of the John Blodgett Arboretum, the riparian corridors of the Gales Creek and Tualatin River watersheds, and the 750-acre Fernhill Wetlands. The B Street Permaculture Project (a 15-minute walk from campus) is a learning laboratory for sustainability that directly addresses the human component of environmental problem solving. Regionally, there are many exemplary resources available within a one- to two-hour drive of campus such as the Willamette and Columbia Rivers, Tillamook and Willapa Bays, and the forests of the Coast and Cascade Ranges. The proximity of Pacific University to study sites both wild and human-influenced is one of the main strengths of the Environmental Studies program. The Environmental Studies curriculum includes majors that lead to a Bachelor of Science (B.S.) or a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) degree.
    [Show full text]