well-being.
will
conference
tional
people
I
her
ety
Layla
Carolina.
The hotel
TIlE
I
Anth
ask
N
of
Phi)
I
fund
many
Our
thirty-minute
her
ER
was
Esposito,
Institute
Anthro7oologv.
and
NE\V
failure
ACTIONS
dissertation
research
wh
reasons..
I
rozoo
much
qualities:
The
to
had
SCIENCE
let
to
she
of
a
money
flow
researchers
study
more
social
Child
on
was
..
arrogance
drive
n
She
Much
logy
on
the
our
I
in
attending
interesting
is
found
psychologist
bullying
tells
Health
for
OF
from
effects
relationships
coming
of
the
it
know
and
HU\IAN-ANIi\IAL
me
can
myself
the
annual
and
that
ignorance.
that
a
among
from
be
about
than
meeting
Kansas
boiled
who
Human
with
sharing
animals
she
the
meeting
the
middle
a
other
tells
is
new
down
City
National
a
on
three-hour
a
Development.
program
ha’e
me
animals
federal
ride
the
to
school
of airport
two
she
the
on
relationships
with
Institutes
—CLIFTON
rather
has
grant
recentk
human
director
International
children.
flight
to
a
occurred
woman
the
unattractive
program
She
from
health
conference
at
completed
of
FLYNN
between
is
Puziled.
the
Health
for
named
at
North
Soci—
that
and
i\a the Tempting
for in (NIH)
our asthma? dollars
couple WHY I
While
out anthrozoology,
other on big ow dren
in spayed glected chologists study
of motivation, of relationships
am
the
cat
daily
things autism? ners;
“Flow
how
tent.
While attachment
every
One
thinking SOME
decide
species.
of behavior
impact
and
of a OUR
$2.5
females);
by
life
caring
year, the
It
our
much days.
year
reason
that Tuna
animals
have includes
scientists.
‘What
Mars,
such WE
perception,
whether million
effect
interactions
with
that
RELATIONSHIPS she
of
everyday
for
a
For
for
(neutered
to
money
Treats LOVE,
concentrated
field
as and
behavioral role
cancer says.
pets? Layla the
of
chronically
animals,
example,
are
food,
the
is
a
you Take
the
on
does
strange
paltry’ corporate SOME
“Fantastic! are
for
important
people study
and
Are
is
ownership research,
children:
religion,
existence have
males with
going
you
my
my
oxytocin
especially
memory,
children
the compared
scientists
of
on WE
dog
field. probably
ill
care
cat, other
giving
are
nearly to
uncovering
giant
pets Kansas HATE, and
This in
is
have
the
of Is
Tilly.
more about
on
WITH
friendly
(the
species
so
and
raised pet out?”
morality
how
affects
our
funds
all
that surviving
is
never
a
to have
many SOME
so-called
very affectionate just
City
have NIFI therapy aspects
but
pets,
the
we
I
ANIMALS
makes
with
or
behavioral
has,
will
ask.
heard
what
psychologists
shied the
full
spend
aspects
in
conference $6
neglected
dangerous;
is WE
also
For
a
non-human
be
pets
until of Two
quality an
dance
particularly
billion
heart
love
the
Snickers
of. EAT
a
our
a
away our
fall
effective
to hundred
shot
less
of
Anthrozoology and
field
recently,
hormone)
processes
interactions
leisure attack;
into card
MATTER
important
that human
of
sex
included
from
susceptible
in a
usually.’
needs,”
lives
for
half
the
for
species.
the
differences
NIH
interested
treatment
years,
time.
how
been
me the
than
studying
category
life,
arm million of
play
such
don’t.
facets
I
doles
talks
their
next
chil
and
say.
psy Our
is
the ne are
ith for
in
to
as
a
tional
to
last
and
interact
relationships animal
men
thorny
don’t
Sociologists,
numbers Anthrozoology
THINKING
her
their almost research.
inestic
officials
moral medical
lot
our
many
several
lying publishing
ial.
human-animal
As
tu()
hope
Plott of
agree
Society
ahsays
This
beliefs
academic
objections
studies.)
ions moral us
people our
status
decades
inex terrorism
reasons.
that
are
has
research, hounds.
are
\ attitude
on
s
attitudes
itahl see
and about
for e
hen psychologists, research
ith
our
issues
torn
the of
LIKE
ith
have
called
But,
disciplines transcends
Anthrozoology.
eye
‘se
other
animals to
interactions
anthropologists. About research
I
animals threat.
name
they’ over
how
is
meat tell or
deep
have
to
that
despite
AN
and
radical
wrong-headed,
killed
species
on
eye.
whether
someone
begin
‘ye
of’
two
Finall, personal or
arise
come
has
ANTHROZOOLOGIST
human-animal
behaviors
base
might
our
go,
We
veterinarians
should
how
normal these
because out animal
is
become
to
are
anthro700logy
in
discipline. holds
differ
a
a
that
animals
of tell
their
people
make
that
long
lot
an
human-animal
relationships
differences,
As
treat
three
for rights toward
me
in important
academic annual
Understanding
they
in
Aunt
I such
in
way.
the
common.
study
many’
are our
other
stories
should
Americans
every’
interactions,
animal
(Some
taste
actis
lives
a
Several
Sally fascinated
other
attitudes
meetings
divisive
is
of
human-animal
species
researchers
component with
isn
about science,
a boundaries, good.
be
of
them
prefer
behas relationships. loves We
small
species
animals ANTHROZOOLOGY
used
journals
America’s
their
live the
social
all
toward
where The
their
are
the
by’
and
to
iorists,
pond, to
as
with psychology
anthrozoologists
believe
anthro700logical pets.
hunt
changing.
topic
call who is
debate
of
subjects
better.
wacky
the
issue
are
researchers
Among
important some
human interactions,
animals,
hut
greatest
historians,
it
In
bears
study’
We
Interna seems
devoted
that
human-
that
addition,
over
in
dogs
of
in
don’t
under
and
the
our
life our with
the
our
FBI
bio
triv do
and
the
or
for
a
cause
report
the
of
over
anthrozoological
ample, hot
the
One DO
who “pet
ing
year-old
(called
visit up
counseling.
Janell helps
canine probably
depression
ere dren, results
often tors’
Pennsylvania,
when
connection
fo
issues
with
United
But
1
therapy”
found
a
DOLPHINS
of
offices
SOME
50
you
me
the
their
adolescents,
get
couple
for
the
Miner
AAT
of
ersion
does
the
colleges
animals
mother’s
they
do
work
a
forty-nine
most
in
to
individuals
effectiveness
that
or latest
sense
States,
When
WE
most
better
to
by
the
riding
lose
of
was
played
and
enhance
out
between
of
long-term
some
anthro’zoologists)
common
LOVE,
times
research Purdue,
new
and
findings
can
of
weight
Dr.
important
coined
assisted-living
Brad
my
adults, I
a
courses
MAKE
anthrozoological
start
published
ith
with
horse,
children
universities,
science
Melfi,
alleviate
with little
a
SOME
the
of
a
week. childhood
Lundahl
and
animal
and
to
low-energy
in
centers.
his
residential
and
and
dolphins
communication
problems.
playing
mental
whine,
in
GOOD
Tony
1964
topics
dog,
the
of
ho
WE
who
argue
elderly
I
studies
human-animal
human
find
human-animal
therapists
facility
has
University
of
Jingles.
Soprano’s
HATE,
and
by
cruelty
long
were
with
she
as
in
health
about
that
the
care
golden
research,
THERAPISTS?
Boris
been
people
(Till’
healers,
on
anthrozoology
institutions
suffering.
just
cats
difficult
a
University
SOME
perk
spilling
the
The
dog,
facilities.
to
whether
around
problems
skills
sniffs
Leinson,
and
takes
shrink.)
retriever
of
have
animals
in
effectiveness
how
residents
up
interactions
or
here
Missouri
settings
interactions.
WE
that
to
Animal-assisted
of
my
stroking
a
and
when
been
for
such
we
tough
work
walking
children
are
They
of
EAT
guts
AAT
rather
and
with
is
walks
decades.
a select
Utah
a
ranging
in domesticated.
whether
child
as
the
have
with
few
love
adult
to
found
a
my
watery
was
of
the
are
cat
your
away.
than
our
our
therapy
Take,
with
analyzed
AAT
examples
would psychiatrist
established
ninety-two-
approach
University
violence.
really
used
taught
The
from
cat,
pets,
that
dog
interact
eyes—a
physical
autism?
therapy
I
in
for
would
Tilly,
open
term
dogs
most
will
chil
cure
dogs
doc
and
ex
the
In
in
of
to
the
dents particularly
to
\7
roughly
their
Dolphin known
Australia,
in
to with
tie
have
self-reports,
the
sign
alter phins
are
and
pain,
phins.
the in
dogs
get
the
benefit ailments.
ill
get
places
the
Nature
trade
Dolphin
their to
science
hioenergv
Dolphin
from
take
curative
disorders degree
can
a
magic. up
beneath
human
or
more
use
epiiepsy,
vested
desperate
force,
700
it
Therapy
that
from
for horses.
like
even
hopes
courses
taking
is
Israel,
does to
In
when
than
bucks
of
a
or
behind
alleged,
against
therapy
Dolphin
communicate
brain
will
these
therapy, the
interest
most
powers
interacting
the
couple
force
such
shrink
their
poorly
not
he
cerebral
Dolphins
drugs
parents
and
and
they’
one
Florida
help in
veil.
waves.
for
fulfilled?
(but
creatures
give
research
as
these
their
improvement
fields,
sounds
can
designed
in
Dubai, hundred
Research
of
of
tumors.
therapy
have
however,
each
Just
keep
autism
like
up
not
the
weeks
dolphins
who
palsy,
with
Kes,
will.
alleviate
used
claims.
with the
like
its
Prozac. a
hour results.
all)
them
great.
methods
horse all
with
will
secrets
and
their
Among
is In
experiments
therapeutic
high
everyone Bali,
for
autism,
Center
in
of
is
each
of
expensive.
addition,
in
honest.
was
Most
pa’
are
the
perpetual Go
more
a
Down
therapy
Down
in them
nonhuman
l)olphin
the
frequency
Great
dolphin
other,
easily.
and
the
swimming,
whatever
studies,
about the
over
in
of
water.
controversial
else,
hoping
syndrome.
We
the
syndrome,
race.
statistics:
presumed
many
are,
them
swim-with-dolphins
Britain,
the
and
conducted
Scientists
therapy
Two
the
Mona
tank,
throw
Netherlands
researchers
the
clicks
therapists.
Is
after
That’s
top:
even
it
same
of
are
disorders,
that,
the
weeks
get
takes
ANTHROZOOLOGY
subjects
you
Russia,
the
Lisa
to
around
They
all,
is
Interacting
based
the
healing
AIDS,
and
well.
money
than
wh
as
through
have particularly
by
learn
claims
should
to
wild
smiles
ability
at
depressed
individuals
And,
grunts
can
flock
help
But
Antilles
graduate
the
did
on
AAT
and
to
the
phrases
the
chronic
mechanisms
well
animals
be work
made
anecdotes,
before
measurably
Bahamas,
on
check
some
will
their
to
programs
in
tricks
Curacao
deafness,
with
that
involving
duped,
directly
spent?
average,
droves
attrac
costs
people
hard
work
about
stu
like
kids
who
hack
un
held
dol
you
dol
out of
“internal
“single
wont
help
our
\orks,
even
mine
gest
instituted
on
The
The
by
ing
ducti
se.
perience—exPlai0
therapy?
appealing
floating
where
all
camp?
of
our
with
use
search
on
Good
a
the
vav.
treatments
rhe\
Could
a
the
How
reduce
differences
temporary
handicapped In
if researchers
SOME
experiments.
bore
what
a
pre
monkeed
and
dolphins
it
the
a
Coosumei your
order factory
Fortunately,
other
reall\
and
in
were factory
scientists
Think
were
can
a
ious
YOU
something
double
t
creatures
series
tropical crush
WE
the
expectations
pes
to
external
we
just
show
neat
with
from
change.
not
floor,
uptick
are take
LOVE,
chances
about
in outside
of
found
with
separate
of
our
blind
Reports
children?
tempOrary
due
changes
worker
try
the
due
things
seas,
the
those
ahout
small
a
there
on
then
like
pet
in
cold,
validitv’
the it.
SOME
to
to
improvements
that
experiments.”
to
[‘hey
details
Chicago.
Earth,
performance,
that
In
and
for
ideas,
better
be
the
caused
the
modifications.
the
work
they
more are
type
that product
hard
in
addition
nearl
success
on
\
improvements concluded we
WE
Hawthorne
real
live
effect
methods
group
he
except
“placebo
can
made
approach.
in
schedule
the
than lighting
ou
look h
HATE,
hired
eflects for
work
ill
1924,
eer
travel
unconscious
happen
itv.
of
lookout
to
are
a
at
of
uncOflsciOllSlV
seen
a and
ust
to
een
ultrahigh-frequency
hanging
en
to
a
whether
‘I
small
that
German or
SOME
high.
First, the
hile
control,
change
sa
of
group
Effect
he
and
teniporar
to
help
ironment
in
better
correlation
when
caused
interacting
during
for
hat,
managers
beautiful the
that
in
patients
change
the
they tease
WE
out
of
alternati’
a
chologists
the
they
biases increases
for
-simply
rescaRhers
pay
it
these
supporti’
‘random
pschologists
length
by
increased
with EAT
involved
two
tilt
benefits
would
example,
feel-good, out
or
a
made
undergoing
in
is
places.
of
with
change
that
conceptual
the
longer
weeks
some
the
not
the
ha
the
e
of
s
in
e
make
dolphin
explanations.
assignment.
dolphins
can
playing
was
simpl
actual rest
ing
causality.
of stematically
en
pa
Flaw
the
worker
cjrefull
does
spend
ol
breaks
in
we
interacting
at
to
creep
a
ironment
followed
the
periods.
the
lighting
sstem.
routine.
dolphin
new
thorne
dolphin
deter
need
undo
effects
sounds
tools
the
field
most
big
time
from
pro
per
into
cx
oh-
1
re
to
advocates
dolphin
conflicts
comes
the
measures
them
dolphin
mental
apy
Scott
psychohabble.
psychology’s
reveal
is
mirrors
first
anatomy
She
person.
vibes,
these
But Lori concluded
during
were
there
physically
Keys. sered
a
Eon
Given
effects
But
clinical
has
her
scientist
has
i\Iarino
was
carefully
exposed
claims
was
much
from a
They
retardation,
sessions
each
therapy
and
(a
therapy
what
She
a
real healing
of
now
of
of
Loris
claim.
methodologically
trait
demonstrable
not
handicapped
interests. of that
their
psychologist
improvement,
doing
Scott
about
most
spends
found
love
have session,
to
and
been
about
the
they
much
to
evaluated
shared
the
show
is
expertise
in
is
smile,
brains
They
is
an
Scott
been
sacred
an dolphins
contend
new
effective
your
which
studying
were
kids that
dolphins.
autism,
the
her
ultrasonic
average
effective
not that
with
and
conducted
think
things
when
personality
Lilienfeld
would
dolphins’
kids
Saturdays
the
most
who
effect
cows,
the
nearly
dolphins
with
they
inadequate
that
mysterious
humans,
from
flawed:
for
dolphins
and perfect
methods
of
in
has
she
it
She
of
in
treatment
dolphins
have
have
dolphin
such
on
disorders
there
a
is
only
enough
anxiety.
an
pleasant
the
was
made
dolphin
purported
by
at
was
interacted
troubled
all
trying
(they
small
team
the
been
as
increased
apes,
Emory
several
ten
for
dolphins
control
is a
pseudoscience.
of
originally
electric
whether
talk
graduate
a
ability
and
no
to
nearly
don’t).
for
published
seconds
such
career
better
to
to
The
sample
therapy
elephants,
en
be
valid
going
bodies
assess
University.
researchers.
find
Scott’s
any
ability
groups,
with
ironments,
beneficial.
to
fields?
feeling as
ignored
twenty
those
found
off
out
of
student
attracted scientific
ANTHROZOOLOGY
homes
recognize
on.
depression.
sizes,
of
program
groups
whether
and
the
playing
studies
ability
to
of
inability
dolphin
and
In
Rorschach
Careful
Not
of
heal
that
taking
years
disorders
the
Lori
lack minds.
Fact,
for
Among
in
The
well-being
magpies).
and
of
to to
evidence
content
claiming
with
themselves
neuroscience.
in
dolphin
through every
children,
rescued
mentalh
is
of and
cut
the
the
ultrasounds
to
on
dermatitis,
researchers
researcher
anahses
the
an
objective
Lori
separate
them
dogs.
through inkblots
children
some
unusual
that
was
one
animal
Florida
Scott
with
ther
that
good
cats.
that
that
and
and
and
the
its
are
of
of
in of SOME WE LOVE, SOME WE HATE, SOME WE EAT ANT H NO Z 00 LOGY blowing off dolphin therapy as scientific mumbo jumbo, Lori and Scott joined the cause. letsv Smith was an anthropologist at llorida Interna want to put the industry out of business. They call it a dangerous fad. I tional Unisersity in the 70s when she 9 began bringingdolphins and men can see the fad part, but why is it dangerous? If you can afford it, why not tall handicapped childrenl together. At first, the results looked good, and let kids with too little joy in their lives frolic with Flipper for a couple of she quicki) became a proponent of dolphin therapy ot an more In weeks? Seems harmless. a letter released h the Aruba L\larine Mammal foundation Dr. Smith Lori doesn’t agree. She points out that this “therapy” poses risks for wrote that the primar\ motixe of all capt Re programs is mone .‘ Ouch, both humans and animals. Dolphins can be aggressive,even to the chil According to iii friends who have done it, swimming ith dolphins dren they are supposed to be healing. A recent study found that half of fun. Rut marine mammals are not magic bullets. \ week of dolphin 400 people who worked professionally with marine mammals had theraps won’tstraighten the spine, heal the troubled mind, or present epi suffered traumatic injuries, and participants in dolphin therapy programs leptic sei/ures. Save our rnone; sa e a dolphin hae been slapped, bitten, and rammed (the latter resulting in a broken rib and a punctured lung). Youcan even contract skin diseases from these animal therapists. DO PEOPLE LOOK LIKE THEIR DOGS? Dolphin therapy also raises pesky ethical issues. Clinical psychologists
choose to become therapists. Dolphins do not. While most animals used \\ hen people find out I study human animal relationships, the often tell in dolphin therapy programs in the United States are born in captivity. mc, ‘Oh, ou should talk to m friend She is crais about her in wild, often in massive \\ hen my in other countries they are usually captured the sister told me I should talk to Pauk’t . te jacobson I took her up it on it. roundups. Lori sass that seven dolphins die for each one that makes to Paulette uses wRh a Shih ‘I,.u named \liss Bette I)a is (Missx for a cetacean Cuantanamo, where it will spend the rest of its life swimming slioru on Bainhridge Island near Seattle ..\liss is a rescue dog who was circles in a concrete pool. erelv neglected by her presions ow ncr. \ow she I es a fe nI lu\ur\ Do we have the right to capture intelligent animals with complex that includes home-cooked meals, boat rides on Puget Sound, and a fanc social livesand sophisticated communication systems and turn them into wardrobe. Paulette gets a kick out of dressing Missy up. Miss has a rain therapists Forautistic children? I suppose the practice might be justified if coat and sweaters, sunglasses and goggles. Sometimes Paulette and Miss these animals really did possess special curative powers. But I would need dress alike and ride around Bainbridgeon their motor scooter. Thes make rock-solidesidence that dolphins can transform the isolated autistic child, a cute couple. People ssaxe and stop to take their picture. A pet boutique or that a couple of hours of dolphin play could add fifteen points to the is opening on the island, and Paulette Cant waft to see the new lines of 1Q a girl syndrome, or that dolphin electric fields could jolt doggyfashions ss of with Down thes ill offer. She I adores iss. Paulette told mc, She is the middle-age depressive out of his debilitating funk. But that evidence esersthing I want in a dog.”Rut \lissv is more than a companion for Pau does flinte\iSt. letti “.\liss is m alter-ego. I think of’her as a fashion aceessor, Dolphin therapy is an unregulated industry that is not certified or \icole Richie took the idea ol her pet being an extension (if herself appro ed by am’ recognized psychological or medical professional orga literally when she had hair estensions that m,itched her own hair color ni/ation. In 2007. the British Organizations the Whale and Dolphin Con attached to the coat of her dog. Honey Child. Ihat People resemble their servation Society and Research Autism called for a ban on all dolphin dogs is an enduring Piece of folk is eholog —that’s P Cholog-sJ)eak therapy programs. Even a pioneer in the dolphin therapy movement has for conscntional ssisdorn. ou know the stereot pes burl hikers with jailhouse
Avenue
dogs? gists about Coren cuts to prefer attracted huskies
to the he and friendlier, spaniels Each to look. And, looked to way is look Michael couples On the
lise
rate
that
his look
predicted,
To Lniversity
Interesting.
dog
I’he
huskies. the consergence
that
their
like have
They
SOME
if
of as
floppy-eared with
thought
kids
test
pictures
like
\vith
owner so,
like
seemed,
and
researchers who
attractive and the
surface,
Roy
tattoos exposed their to
faces
more
found
why?
like his
follow
one
animals their
their
WE
\somen
beagles hasenjis, pairs
has
In
and
Coren
of
the dogs—cons
and
hpothesis.
it
of
Howeser, loyal,
look. night,
addition, LOVE,
e
how
go
that
British
ow on
the dogs.
idea
the
their four Nicholas
as
idea been of
breeds
pet
for
came
ners.
that
themselves
rated
found
better
they
lank’
loyal
and Plus, idea
same
people
for
Christenfeld
is dog
was
SOME
‘I ears
actually pit
married
Columbia
hat
looked
true,
short-haired smarter.
example—while are.
Coren He
up
ergence
like
it how
seems
breeds
Coren
hulls;
obese
not
that
and principle?
Christenfeld.
‘\fghans.
would
would
task
are
w
wondered
WE
Why
beagles
the
that
ith
the
women
and women
grow
for like
did
attracted
leggy people
nutt.
was
asked
HATE,
that
Coren
two
and
prefer
be.
researchers
psychologist far-fetched. shouldn’t
a
noticed
on
liked
themselves,
not But
long
Coren
to
taken
women
and
and differed possible
selection.
the fashion
‘a
with
if
women 1-loweser,
tend
SOME
look argued
actually
\\‘hile do ith breeds
each
time
this
to
springer women how
dogs
that
reasoned on people
short
picking
long
romantic
to
more
rated
were
reasons in
figured After
do models
smart WE dogs
recently
with reading that they and
with
base
dogs
women
fhe
prose
the
hair
hair
there in
with
span
EAT
reaDs
alike the
the
people
an
clog
all,
fact are
looks.
different convergence shape
sharp it oserweight that
in
liked
preferred
partners
wh
that
stroll
appeared.
animal
that
prick-eared iels.
long case from by
is with
social
the
attracted
expert
converge
oser
look
if
evidence
psychologists
people like how of
prick
there
the people
people
books
down
hair
in
short
storvbooks
their
psvcholo
the like hairstyles
you
a
who
real
springer
hasenjis
friendly
Stanley
dogs.
certain
ears—
just
would
should to. theory
in years. ought
want
their
often were hair Park
ears.
dogs
tend
that
life.
are
the
as
If
surprisingly
support
than
found
lies when
them,
that
pets.
dents
randoml
a
matched
ss
that
Thus
better
better
But, ing.
match
dog,
from
took
it
significantly more
and ith
we
much er,
be
Like
The
chance
is
people
Finally,
I
there
that
their
Id
a
unconsciously were the
Research
harder
if and
the’ pictures Christenfelcl first
for
these
esplanation
than relationship
most
dog-ow
the
test
the
they
researchers
owners
guessing.,
students
people
the
a
strong. dogs
not
would
read
levels
grew
predicted
owner
photo
clogs
that, these
as
scientists,
to
photographs
look
idea
successful better ncr
predicted of
know
groups
and
Roy
and
to can
The
tended not While Go
owners
ideas,
of
with
like
that similarity should
of
\nd,
between
predicted
look boss
seek
and
their
a
were
what
figure. match hit
he ow that
researchers
different
I
in
them.
a
the
have
not
just
similar
Ho) more ncr-dog
any Christenfdld’s animals
rate h\
to lot
at
ene,ue1j, and
consisting
purebred
make
matching
a
right
right
matching eserone their
resemble
pictures
of as mixed-breed
hoW
and a in relationship
than
that
fhe
their
like
skeptical
predicted people
purebreds dog dog.
the
appeara
on
dog.
selection
that Christenfeld
long
thought
selection
if
their
would
dogs
pets.
and
all of right
They would
of
Japan,
resembles this
their owners If
look
do
people
article
a
Owners
streak.
only
counts. ow
pets two-thirds
nec
h
puppy picture The
between tend
idea
match be
asked that
theor,
than
like
ncr
owners,
occur
the
theor,
and
matching
random
espected
of the
lise
researc!ers
hung
to
But I is
looked. the
us
and
selection
their
will in
mixed
was
college The
England
of
about look
correct,
longer
with
there
only when
ANTHROZOOLOGY
how
rnutts,
selection
I
of
their the in
the around
look
not
has-c
pets,
chance
the
students
like
contrast,
than
breeds
their
in if
long
was
judges
5O
at ow
picking students
they
theory,
like
dogs
the time.
become
purebreds there
the subsequently then
all
their [‘his
ncr,
dog
no
convergei’e
theor
people
dogs
of were
convinced as
lived
scientihc
at
were
es
should
This
is made his correctly
ith dogs the an parks
a
should
holds
th
better
idence
to
and
pet.
because
a
operat
adult.
with their
was or
lived
tr) be time. stu
just
was
and
is
sets
and
her that how
Boy
do
to
be
a DO DIFFERENT at
of is the time, going narians \h has. need felt husband. lis the
they
says he surprised determines lie v,int will a to in I
asked
eat not.
a
her
and a
watches
What
friends Bill, other
admits
Ph the time. our
I
cats
DOG
His instantix that
re
are
am
for SOME
person,
an In into
cats,
Phyllis
he His slightest
hacky
cut for
if
recent
on
doing both in
a
parents almost
for if does
I She iii
she
full
was
once
that
is
Phyllis
PEOPLE his
he the patching
hen the
the Gallup
the
mal WE
depression.
ard
prohably a
affection
thinks has
put
saw
battle
were
when
Ph
home sears,
suddenh
foul-tempered
ps
he
PERSONALITIES?
types other news.
she
certain
spent companion desire LOVE,
didn’t
or
themsekes had
and
lbs
enjoy chotherapist.
a
po11.
you
said
us
difference
with he
up
dogs
have
Phyllis
of
hand,
like
a
But
ing
cats
a
Bill to AND
ha SOME
and
talks that s month happen
Chipper,
pets
dog
no,
It
lix “()(
letting
lise
stray
:ihout
hx are
he
e shifted
was
have
ing since
independence,
that
that
you does
pets
person.
has
people
himself,
to
with
doesn’t
CAT
of
suck-ups. into
Chris, WE
with housesitting a
tomcats
between
Phyllis to
a
cats
one
a
A think vi
it
daily forked
when she
her mixed not
grow
mericans good slightlx. HATE.
was one one
11
PEOPLE
fall
cats.
‘1 of
get
two
feed was
gras
he particularl She
hat’s struggle
of
himself.
not of
on them
he
out
up and
for. one.
cat marriage. rid
would SOME
pills
these Oxer
in
ourself
the the claims
was
l’rom tabby, personLility
a in
because,
thousands
for
A of
raccoons. say
people
college,
mix
lie
Cix
a
cute phone
eats
eerv
the
grow that
her
fam
time, But
HAVE
not categories.
on
thex WE
indifference
en
that
it’s isho
as
like
mice
She
and
and
kitten his
ik
base then I and
her
ing
either da, EAT
their
if
when usually
won
are
his
she
that
but
has
of belly
animals. asked,
is
agreed he
up.
H
in
dog
he
a one
dog attitudo dollars
a
simply
also mica1
only nicels
serendipit
never
has a pet
a
he
And cat
and
our
married
at
dog people,
penchant
two
to
for
people.
most
is
likes
at night to
person: dogs
part
basement.
tolerance.
expertise, Bill
awa.
according He
balanced to
person asks shows eplleps\,
give all. s
or
toward
xeteri
people of
in
or
three
nexer
when nex
Phyl
I
how
one
Fhis that
was the
you her Bill
for
he
up
er
or
Podherscek
usually
(lechnically
a
W’hil
sears.
base
a
hand.
whether
ing
traits,
while
fascinating
good animals,
L
Sam
ties,
cx
hat in brief aspect
rhe
nix
But
en
what
American
This
But
euro[icism been
Agreeableness
Extroversion
Conscientiousness ou
Openness
One ersity
or
there
and description he just
though
others some
Big
lesson
before
is
of
you
is
has
are
music
w
question
I
ai’guing
an this
call issue
Fixe
pet
us it
ondereol
are
of
hook, this
of
found
really hang
true
do
anthroioologist
we
in we
research
Texas yet homes.
it
our
traits a
Versus
they is
not.
is the the
can
f’ew
live
\c’rsus of
Snoop: Versus that another
loaded about
inspirational
like.
referred that
personal
was
\
a
if
Big
ersus psychology
fight
w are:
He
dnswer
holdouts,
person’s
(Marx’
dog
ho
the
Closed
ith
on
the
Versus taken
Fix
can,
the
Emotional
Introx
What
on
about studies
piece
a ,
people
pei’sorialii human
contents \ ci
is
to
cat.)
Preferences
ntagon
the
nature
your
at Jean
for
paradoxical
Personality
to
on
as
most ersion
lmpulsiseness
posters Your Cambridge
of
is
of question
example,
Experience
the
individual
iPod,
and
h’
how common
and
Personality
Personality ism
Stability
of
of
Stuff
psychologists
ies
Sam
Fixe
cat
your human
1.
many
on
how
of’
rex
of by
as
Scns
by
people
tell
your
Gosling,
Factor
cal Lniversity’ pet
refrigerator sense
dog
the
there
differences
messy
measuring
personality
a
personality
(which
is
aspects
Yoout
owners
office
lot
people
way,
haie
in
that ANTH
are
agree
Model;
about
your
a
order.
iou)
are
wall. more proxes
named
pschologist is
different
\ersus
say of
were
five ROZOO
that
in bedroom
traits
described
y’ou
both
our
has
for
psychologists
nothing
Psychologists
people On
cats
basic
we to
from different
Anthony cat
a
personility shown
there
dog
the be hundred LOGY
personali
than
can
people,
traits.
is,
w
knoxx- people, and
about
at other in
are,
rong
get
and
that
dogs
his the
in from dozens
or results. The there from tains of going to an 2,088
dog was that catch,
call pc’rsonaljt state itv
people
be
more
item
Is
Here
scores
So, -,
people
ourself
you
in
non—pet
concluded SOME
was
of a non—pet an
this
to
dog
Dog Cat Dog of
Cat Dog
In in dog
For
the
your
in
w
emotionally
online
are
prohahl
studies this have
another
also
this
w
were
people
which
—not
people people and
eer person,
people people people
moderate
w.outof WE
the
refrigeratoi.
a
ow
case,
true
case,
owners. taken
dog
cat
xersion that
relatisely LOVE,
results:
ners
comparing
as
stud
participants
and one
are are would
are are are
people.
folk a
person of service.com/highve.
much
there
the
cat over
stable
in
more more the
si/c
more that more
more
527 SOME
reporting
pscholog
The
of
their
catch person,
have
small.
was dog the
as
the
and or
cat range. found
opeii
neurotic.
ext agreeable.
conscientious.
or
the
the
basic
a WE
last
scoured
person/cat no
were
predicted.
people
Big
roi’erted.
less most
is
cat
two
(‘I’he
contents
to neither,
e
that
no HATE
that
ten
The
Fi’e
is
personalities.
person neii’
idence
independent asked
of
difference groups.
right—there
pet
had sears.
exception
the
the the
bottom
Personality experIences. SOME
In or
But person
of
owners
if
taken that
tells differences dilferences
scientific
both.
2009,
your
they
(You and
in
pet
between WE
us
line
was science,
the dichotom?
Pod. found
than
considered
were
can is
In
he
owners
something EAT
‘lest
a
is
a
personality
extroersion,
difference
temporarily literature,
take
are little
hut
in non—pet
more that
a
the
that
there
hodgepodge
their
along
were
more
it
oer
whether
two
extroverted
yourself Sam themselves
thousands
about
is
different personal
the
between
owners,
than
a
test, located groups.
ulten
added
main
week,
which
lines
‘,our
you
the
by
of
a
the animal
around
and geroLis
mean
between
in
flesh,
instilled
human
that
tor\,
Some
chologw
lustrates
pschopatliolooy
makes children
era
innocent-looking
C was
animal
the
On
BECOME
DO our
on anton
jeli
I
arracci
get
he
lhe
delighted
l
particularl
fish
child
Cruelt
\letropohtan
an a
things
crueit for his treatment
scientists
CHILDREN awa
reason children anthropologist
recent
the in
the
cruelty?
infliction
relationships,
oil
For
into
how
hundreds
are
left
aptly
us gets
pleasure
painting
Painting
with
that
also
example,
h clamping
angelically and
hand
in our we
VIOLENT
from
titled
arc
isit
a
believe
of
ripping
the
Is
that
should offers
it,”
can culture
young
interactions htiman_dii’ected
of
luseuni
animals,
of
naturally
and it
to lying
fact
that by
She
alect WHO
especially Iwo
just will years,
\lai’garet There
happen
Manhattan
one is
fodder
a
a
that
their
boy he
smiling,
that
a animal was that
sixteenth-century
large Children a
someda\ a
ADULTS?
of’
hunter
childish
nice tin John
cruelty
What, of
ABUSE
kind, were
and
routs
prey
its
our
echoing promotes
to
for with
Art
can
cra
Mead
chilling.
massive
to
girl a abuse
Locke
those apparently
ancestors lots
and
derives
to
of
violence,
Teasing child erupt looking animals
I
for to
fish
animals
toward
prank
spent and pieces.
cruelty
of
the
wrote
a
that
ANIMALS
instance,
activities looking
in the
and
theme
them,
claws
is
into
a
What
tail
from
his
a
or
callousness Lir
cat.
an
to members
is
were Italian
result
reflect
Others,
immanuel Cat.
In that
delighted
lie
an Lir
of
that
right.
kill paintings
afternoon
but
onto
for that The shooting fact,
should
a
in
is
indicator
worse
like
likely “one
Fhe ANTHROZOOLOGY
dog?
or
one
of’
animal moral
the artist
our
larger
the
has ho
He
howexer,
Kant
torture hunting
nature of
painting of of
toward
with
moral \
Kant
meat-eating
cat’s e
we
has is depicting
been other iolence?
deer
inconsistencies
named the
SI the
olutionary
themes
cruelty
of thought
holding
roiling
make
their provoked ear.
connected
most or
an deep-seated most
and
difference and
knocking argue
animals
portrays species
nurture?
animal
Annihale
That
leads
in eating
that
“game,”
striking through human- of
the
dun
that
apes
that
psy
his
this
the
the
is a cat
il
an to animal criminality.
groups inality
lert, abuse was nals. and just friends eve-opener. his
over it Henrys Henry glass. was she suddenly
exact guns. mals used helie no Darwin,
‘This
back
human-directed
One
felons, In
I childhood I
tortured
had a thinking different.
the
The
and
was plead SOME
land
when
leader
e spot
animals
act One
the was
abuse
and
of
if
and
of
simpl
mom
least
participated
who
serious. highly oer.
surprised
lay. they
aggressix
the crabs
wife-heaters,
wake
where
conducted guilty,
morning.
Others,
his
they
I-or WE
forth in
frogs.
in
about heavily
of
wrote bought first
They
than
p.ils
the ‘I’he
from eer
friends children
example,
and aggressie LOVE,
the
of
were
the
She
too.
oer
sstematic
study’
e
hrutalit.
it
this that blew how
pup
abused
cooked men
toads offenders.
in
enjoying
on RB
in criminals, crime
now him
said
by Vs
little.
his SOME
a
decided
exer.
or
animal
my
and is hen so
died
of
gun
Alan
my
in
up picket
a for
yes makes
often
serial
criminals autobiographx
human-animal
many
was
animals conscience
live little the
‘let
buddy
I
frogs
similar are
in
studies
Some target
the
a WE
was
but
Felthous,
All
cruelty
couple hand,
other
coinrnitted.” cats to
the nonaggressi\ fc’nce.
none
killers
not
brown
him people
power.”
that HATE,
growing
he
with
play
Fred.
practice
anthroioologists first
when
were so
associating
studies,
in
did
want groups.
of
I
she
of The
as among sure. as
saw micro
catch
puppy
firecrackers.
a step
I
them SOME ii
that,
was
days
much
a psychiatrist, show
just knew (However, interactions.
they
builder,
up
to
a
child,
with dog
e
on
I
songbird
And
in cry. with fry
could
them. as
turned with ave criminals,
later.
n have WE
were
a animal
more
admitted
hanged
Florida,
our
by
a
path ants
\‘\
she
ovens, their
confessed
boy
the EAT
floppy
my
not hen
taken
are Henry ‘seither
Daisy Darwin \\
children.
likely
to
w got
that
sitting
and ‘l’hey
cruelty
“1
puppy hen
remembering
ith leel
talk
into
my
I convinced
the
drowned and
beat to
very
asked
ears.
leads
to Red
Stephen
to
a
told
friends he
abusing inter\ about
dark
did that
then
the magnif’ing on of
repeatedk
asking
by noncrimi
and
a
It quiet
w Ryder
One
iolenee
a to puppy, me Linda
Charles ciS
was
pickets
tossing
he
limb. side—
iewed
wrote,
it. crim
adult
dogs.
and
that Kel
f\
that
and
ani
and
clay
m
Ian
the
BR
an C’,
if
I I
I
bad
children
the
that
hood Clearly,
to animal
ings. chological
tenuous. Department
connection
of
serial Not
dence.
hax
Columbine, Jeffre
\lisslssippi: them
of
and
the gulf yssociation,
silently a
figured,
ha
the l’he Ihere
relationship seed
the
tragedy. BR
e
I
true.
animal ‘I-he
‘I-he
e last
a
haxe xiolence
perpetrators killers
between
Link
accused
abuse.
wouldn’t two Some history’
some
and harmed
hypothesis
Dahmer,
are
In
researchers animal
dropped idc’a r\n
characteristics
why
nexer
are
between
First, abuse 2004,
later
is
of several
and
Paducah,
analysis
Colorado’
link
Public I
‘l’hey that
now
directed
of
is not
ink
an Edut100
somehow
of
or
do
I school
and
animal
been
the
Lee
exer
ugly
and
to childhood did iolencc’
take a
adx
proponents a there
killed
much
Some
reasons
concluded,
presentations
registered
joint
found school
why of the
serial
ocates
not
Kentucky_again
adult Boyd
overl
shot.
land
toward a
shooters
34
Springfield
abuse. is
of
ground, related.
shot
an
children damage.
haxc it undertook task
would
a
the
that killers:
exists.
cases why
crab
shootings
x
strong lalo
animal would
animal
impressed
iolence
at
overstate trademark
force
people a
perpetrators “\
only
you had
it know
and
he
of I dead.
cry by
are
he
Albert I
fink
have
I
(the
serial
Oregon: was
connected
of’ at a
a might
five Link
was cruelts,
a
problem ‘[‘here
n few
is history
liars,
thoroigh and
lively
the any
between history I
the
with
you so
all wrong.
D.C.
of ow
was sure
murders DeSalvo
adxocates
of’
think animal
well
the L.S
committed
cheats of time ned
rlutionship
is,
heliex
bird
Joneshoro
the
Then
of this
horrified.
sniper I
is thirtx-seye
of
however
shooters
would
A
by
childhood I examination
established
determining childhood
Secret
that
attackers prior
cruelty perched
call ANTHROZOOLOGY
puff
type
found e
ithe the
cruelty
thiexes
the
often
that
accomplice)aIl
animal
the
American
miss.
by to
of
Boston
of
school
‘There
Service
had Arkansas
between
some
that to most
begin
boy’s air, the
in
first
anecdotal
animal
school is
were
animals. animal
and
that
And,
a
a
of
nearly’ cruelty
how cxcii
and
incident.
or
history
cx
tree. was reputed
Strangler)
shootings:
one
with
the
and bullies
Humane idenee e the known
child
shoot after
abuse. close the
cruelty
en
more
a
Pearl,
the
80
It psv
The
the tales
term in cxi
huge
of
all was bird
to
all,
of SOME WE LOVE, SOME WE HATE, SOME WE EAT ANTHROZOOLOGY by the time they are in elementary school. Psychiatrists refer to this pat connections between childhood cruelty and adult violence. In Philosophy tern of behavior as a conduct disorder. In the 1960s, it was thought that 101 (Logic), you learn that “allAs are Bs does not imply that fire-setting, bed- all Os are three traits were especially characteristic of these kids: As.” fhus the fact that most heroin addicts first smoked marijuana does wetting, and animal cruelty. While this trio is not as closely connected not inplv that most first-time marijuana smokers will become junkies. as originalh thought, the American Psychiatric Association still includes Similark. een if every school shooter and every serial killer had disorders. The bad abused animal cruelty as a diagnostic criterion for conduct animals as a child (a dubious claim), we could not logicallyconclude that seed hypothesis holds that animal abuse is not a cause of delinquency, but children who pull the wings off moths are apt to become murderers of whom will become psycho a sign of a seriously troubled child, many lore important, the numbers do not support the idea that most early pathic adults. animal abusers become violent when they grow up. Emily PattersonKane A stronger version of Link thinking is called the violence graduation and Heather Piper analy,ed the results of two do,en research reports of hypothesis. ‘l’hisis the idea that pulling the wings off butterflies or beat childhood cruelty among extremely’ iolent men çserialkillers, sexual abus ing a dog is the first in a series of steps that can eventually end in prison. ers. school shooters, rapists, and murderers) and males with no history of The title of an influential book by Linda \IerL-Perez and Kathleen Heide violence(collegestudents, teenagers, and normal adults). They found that idea—AnimalCruelti: Patlm’ai to iolence against People. captures this 35 of the violent offenders had been childhood 37( animal abusers_but so One implication of this theory is that animal abuse in children can be had of the males in the normal” control group Su7anne Coodney used as a form of profiling, a wayof identifying the potential serial killers Lea, a sociologist,obtained similar results. She studied the backgrounds and school shooters before their violence escalates. of 570 young adults, of I5 whom had a history of animal abuse, animal cruelty She So. are the data in? Can we conclude that childhood found that children who got in fights, lied habitually, used w’eapolis,or set causes later violence? Not necessarily. A group of researchers led by fires did tend to become violent adults. Animal cruelty’,however did up with not Arnold Arluke, a sociologist at Northeastern University, came predict later aggressie beha ior. an innovative way to test the graduation hypothesis. They’compared the Arnold \rluke has a talent—listening to people. He puts them animal abuse at ease. criminal records of individuals who had been consicted of and they tell him things they would not normally reveal, lie would have with a group of law-abidingcitiiens from the same neighborhoods.The re been a good homicide detective Arluke used this ability to deke into the searchers reasoned that if the graduation hypothesis were true, the animal minds of collegestudents who had tortured animals The weren’thard to abusers would show a propensity for jolent crimes rather than run-of-the- find. He Just asked students in his classes, ‘lhe students he interviewed mill offenses such as selling drugs or auto theft. had poisoned fish with bleach, ripped the legs off flies, burned grasshop Their results did not support the graduation hpothesis. True, the pers with lighter fluid, and played Frisbee with live frogs. This statement You not want to live by animal abusers erc big-time troublemakers. would a woman he interviewed is typical: “Itwas like we didn’t haie anything next door to any of them: they committed many more crimes than the to do and we were bored, so it’slike, ‘OK,let’sgo torture some cats!” noncriminals they were matched with. But they were equal-opportunity Arluke’sstudents were not an anomaly. In one recent study of college had guys. They were no more likely to be arrested for ‘.iolent crimes students 66( of male students and 40 of female students admitted that than they ere to he arrested for nonviolent offenses like burglary or they-had ah&isc’d animals . Arluke has come up with a radical suggestion, peddling drugs. He believes that for many children, animal cruelty is a normal part of There are other reasons we should he careful about making causal growin up. He calls it dirty pla. It’s firbidden fruit. like swearing or power smoking
spirators, xarietv. generall that
tions.
than Kellert, trated grow but tion \\ interesting
ever, nection moral panic as animal Link adult
gists contentious txx
whether had and
by
een
a The
For it
Anthroioologists
Arluke
is
effects is serious
for SOME
do
up
is
hax haxe But games
ps advocates by
among
obx’ious
crusade
generally animal
And,
most
some not
awkxx cigarettes. abuse.
f’undamentallv
to
children. hetxx
our
e not
inherently chopat pornoraph
the
argued and
come
xx he uncoxered
WE of
issues in
problem unlike
of of
hy
ard fact the een researchers
partners
abuse good animal
important
secret.
Arluke’s Rather,
pursued they
the deranged LOVE,
hs.
recogniLed.
and
to
public. fact
remains
ox animal Like
Fle
in
the microwaxing citi/ens.
bad
question
are er and
are
other in cruelty
the
in thinks is
it
fuels
SOME
in
good
hard-core they
these
students
kids
its mentally is
xx that
het human his
dix Link
crime. issue pschopaths
and
that
ith cruelty media also
own areas
her
ided sex
presumabi
people
For
beliex but animal
is
WE
simplistic most
questions,
animal missionary
skeptics
transcends
childhood
helps
not
x
crimes,
Granted, right,
rue,
cats felt bx inlent ox
of
HATE, ill,
iolence. criminals
are
and
e
going
er wanton
do
human
normal
abuse
morally
remorse cement that
animal
and
the protection are
perpetuating
not
fundamentally
don’t
I
human
Link and
SOME
normal
\
axx the
animal cruel.
the we
our Ibis
strength ,eal. dropping
because
enables
causes
animal
behavior. ax. interx children
argue xxhether abuse
bonds blind,
controversy
for
t
should thinking. relationships
The
debate
WE
p- The Some
x
their
abuse organi
iolence
iewed
aggression
children
that
of
raises cruelt EAT or
between issue it
of
puppies
answer
an
xx
For trc’at
turns
da bad the
is cx youthful
childhood
ho researchers,
is xve
They
h
no
irrational ii.
ations,
is
years.
oxer
a xxii!
has more
connection care students things
xx
too animal l’elthous is should No, different
big to childrei
to
off
the
ith
in not
worry eventuallx play
become the that
important.
question,
is
indiscre
the common
psvcholo
animals: the the
children, co-con
cruelty
good
perpe
ignore causes adult
moral ques abuse were
more
ho’x
root
con
and
than
that
into
he
or
a -
wrote,
ter, offer
is there cruelty
the
people We
both
you
the
cffcctiveness
insestigate
an
is “
fascinating simply
another can
French and
unusual
rnmals
see
adult
because
anthropologist
reason from
are
issues
glimpse
of
and aggression
good
animal-assisted
these
that
like
important, the
into to
examples
the
personality think
are
human
hax
Claude
study
interesting.
with.” e
It
important
therapy
is
of
nature.
the
that
Léx
our
differences
scope
i-Strauss
interactions our
On
and
As
real-life
interactions the
of
I
the
ANTHROZOOLOGY
show
anthroioology
other
hetu
got
link
in xx implications
it
ccii
between
hand,
ith
the right
with
other
cat
next
studies
when
animals is
and
animal people
chap
broad.
Rut
dog
he
of