DOCSLIB.ORG

Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Movement, Practice, and Worldview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Permaculture for Agroecology: Design, Movement, Practice, and Worldview Permaculture for agroecology: design, movement, practice, and worldview. A review Rafter Ferguson, Sarah Lovell To cite this version: Rafter Ferguson, Sarah Lovell. Permaculture for agroecology: design, movement, practice, and world- view. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 2014, 34 (2), pp.251-274. 10.1007/s13593-013-0181-6. hal-01234801 HAL Id: hal-01234801 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01234801 Submitted on 27 Nov 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Agron. Sustain. Dev. (2014) 34:251–274 DOI 10.1007/s13593-013-0181-6 REVIEW ARTICLE Permaculture for agroecology: design, movement, practice, and worldview. A review Rafter Sass Ferguson & Sarah Taylor Lovell Accepted: 17 September 2013 /Published online: 25 October 2013 # INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2013. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Agroecology is a promising alternative to industrial is mobilizing diverse forms of social support for sustainability, in agriculture, with the potential to avoid the negative social geographically diverse locations. (5) And scholarship in perma- and ecological consequences of input-intensive production. culture has always been a diverse marginal sector, but is growing. Transitioning to agroecological production is, however, a com- plex project that requires diverse contributions from the outside Keywords Permaculture . Farm design . Perennial of scientific institutions. Agroecologists therefore collaborate polyculture . Agroecological transition . Diversified farming with traditional producers and agroecological movements. systems . Agroecological movement Permaculture is one such agroecological movement, with a broad international distribution and a unique approach to system de- Contents sign. Despite a high public profile, permaculture has remained relatively isolated from scientific research. Though the potential 1. Introduction ................................1 contribution of permaculture to agroecological transition is great, 2. Background ................................3 it is limited by this isolation from science, as well as from oversimplifying claims, and the lack of a clear definition. Here, 2.1 Shifting Definitions ...........................3 we review scientific and popular permaculture literature. A sys- 2.2 Historical Context ............................3 tematic review discusses quantitative bibliometric data, including 2.3 Conceptual Influences .........................3 keyword analysis. A qualitative review identifies and assesses 2.4 Permaculture and Agroecology .................4 major themes, proposals, and claims. The manuscript follows a 3. Review Methods ................................5 stratified definition of permaculture as design system, best prac- 3.1 Systematic Review............................5 tice framework, worldview, and movement. The major points of 3.2 Qualitative Review .........................7 our analysis are as follows: (1) Principles and topics largely 4. Results ....................................7 complement and even extend principles and topics found in the agroecological literature. (2) Distinctive approaches to perennial 4.1 Systematic and Bibliometric Review ...........7 polyculture, water management, and the importance of 4.2 Qualitative Review .........................11 agroecosystem configuration exceed what is documented in the 5. Synthesis .................................16 scientific literature and thus suggest promising avenues of inqui- 5.1 Substantiation and Scholarship ................17 ry. (3) Discussions of practice consistently underplay the com- 5.2 Limitations of this Study .....................18 plexity, challenges, and risks that producers face in developing 5.3 Future Directions ...........................19 diversified and integrated production systems. (4) The movement 6. Conclusion ................................20 R. S. Ferguson (*) 1105 Plant Sciences Laboratory, University of Illinois at 1 Introduction Urbana-Champaign, 1201 S. Dorner Dr., Urbana, IL 61801, USA e-mail: [email protected] Increasing concerns about the negative impacts of industrial agriculture have generated a vigorous debate over the feasi- S. T. Lovell 1009 Plant Sciences Laboratory, University of Illinois at bility of transition to alternative forms of agriculture, capable Urbana-Champaign, 1201 S. Dorner Dr., Urbana, IL 61801, USA of providing a broad suite of ecosystem services while 252 R.S. Ferguson, S.T. Lovell producing yields for human use. The transition to diversified, researchers, stakeholders, and land users. Permaculture con- ecologically benign, smaller scale production systems is tributes to an applied form of ecological literacy (Orr 1992), addressed in the literature of agroecology (De Schutter supplying a popular and accessible synthesis of complex 2010), diversified farming systems (Kremen et al. 2012), socioecological concepts. The design orientation of permacul- and multifunctional agriculture (Wilson 2008). ture offers a distinctive perspective that suggests avenues of Agroecological transition must be regarded as a complex, inquiry in agroecosystem research. Lastly, these factors are multi-sector project, operating at multiple temporal and spatial embodied in an international movement that operates largely scales and involving diverse constituencies (Geels and Kemp outside of the influence and support of large institutions, 2007;Marques2010;Pirauxetal.2010). For this reason, which suggests opportunities for participatory action research researchers have often directed their attention outside of insti- and the mobilization of popular inquiry and support (Méndez tutional science to document the contributions that traditional et al. 2013). and innovative practices offer to the process of transition The potential of permaculture to contribute broadly to agro- (Altieri 2004; Ingram 2007;Rocha2005; Koohafkan et al. ecological transition is limited by several factors. Of primary 2012; Rosset et al. 2011). Alternative agroecology move- importance is the general isolation of permaculture from sci- ments, for example, have been critical in the process of re- ence, both in terms of a lack of scholarly research about perma- gional agroecological transition (Nelson et al. 2009;Altieri culture and neglect within the permaculture literature of con- and Toledo 2011) and likely will be in the future (Fernandez temporary scientific perspectives. This deficit is compounded et al. 2012; Petersen et al. 2012). by overreaching and oversimplifying claims made by move- This paper addresses the alternative agroecology move- ment adherents and the absence of any systematic multisite ment called permaculture and its potential contributions to assessment of permaculture's impacts. Additionally, the difficul- agroecological transition. Permaculture is an international ty of providing a clear and distinguishing description of perma- movement and ecological design system (Fig. 1). Despite culture can cause confusion and hinder rigorous and systematic permaculture's international extent and relatively high public discussion. profile, it has received very little discussion in the scientific The objective of this paper is to contribute to a better literature. The term originated as a portmanteau of permanent understanding of the substance, strengths, and limitations of agriculture and is defined by co-originator David Holmgren as permaculture as a potential contributor to agroecological tran- “Consciously designed landscapes which mimic the patterns sition. Introductory material includes a brief overview of the and relationships found in nature, while yielding an abun- origins and development of permaculture, the growth of the dance of food, fibre and energy for provision of local needs” movement over time, and a preliminary heuristic for compar- (2004, p. xix). As a broadly distributed movement with a ing the prominence and overlap of permaculture and agro- distinctive conceptual framework for agroecosystem design, ecology across several sectors. The introduction is followed permaculture's relevance to the project of agroecological tran- by a systematic review of scientific and popular permaculture sition has several aspects. Permaculture can function as a literature, analyzing publication type, date, and location, topic framework for integrating knowledge and practice across location, scholarly discipline, and citations. Systematic anal- disciplines to support collaboration with mixed groups of ysis also includes quantitative content analysis using a concept ab Fig. 1 Examples of production and education in the permaculture movement. a Small farm with intercropped annuals and perennials, worked partially with hand labor. b Workshop on the design and maintenance of perennial polycultures Permaculture for agroecology: design, practice, movement, and worldview 253 network approach. Qualitative review of the permaculture and appropriate technology (Pursell 1993) emerged as move- framework then
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE BRIAN C. CAMPBELL Present Position: Associate Professor, Berry College, Director, Environmental Studies Program Evans Hall 212, Mount Berry, GA, 30149-0081 Email: [email protected] Phone Number W: (706) 368-6996 Citizenship: United States of America Languages: English and Spanish Research Program: Agricultural Biodiversity Conservation and Food Sovereignty in Floyd County, GA, and Visual Environmental Anthropology in the US Southern Highlands (Ozarks, Appalachia) and Belize, Central America RESEARCH APPROACHES, INTERESTS, REGIONS Agroecology, Applied, Community-Based, Ethnoecology, Political Ecology, Visual Anthropology Agrarianism, Agrobiodiversity, Environmentalism, Food Sovereignty, Justice, Methods, Sustainability Andes, Appalachia, Central America, Ozark Highlands EDUCATION 2005 Ph.D., Cultural Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA Concentrations: Agricultural Anthropology, Environmentalism, Ethnoecology 2002 Conservation Ecology and Sustainable Development, Graduate Certification University of Georgia Institute of Ecology 1994-1998 B.A., Summa Cum Laude, Truman State University, Kirksville, MO Majors: English, Anthropology Minors: Spanish, International Studies 1996 Attended Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, C.R., Central America PROFESSIONAL AND ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE 2018 Development of “Food, Ecology and Culture in Greece” Study Abroad course and 6-week summer and semester courses at the American Farm School / Perrotis College, Thessaloniki, Greece 2016 Tenured at Berry College, Mount Berry,
    [Show full text]
  • 12Things You Need to Know to Garden Successfully with Aquaponics
    12Things You Need to Know to Garden Successfully With Aquaponics CONTACT US [email protected] Website Blog Facebook Twitter Community YouTube Introduction Aquaponics is an exciting new way to grow your favorite fruits, vegetables, and ornamental plants by combining the best of aquaculture and hydroponics to create a completely organic, sustainable and productive growing method. This method can be used both inside and out, it is dirt- free, weed-free, chemical-free, and it uses less than 1/10 the water needed by traditional, soil-based gardening. In aquaponic gardening water is pumped from the fish tank into a grow bed that is filled with an inert growing medium. The medium is home to colonies of beneficial bacteria and composting red worms. The bacteria converts the toxic ammonia from the fish waste first into nitrites then into nitrates, and the worms convert the solid waste into vermicomost. At this point the fish waste has become a near-perfect food for the plants. The plants now filter the water by absorbing the converted fish waste, making a healthier environement for the fish. This symbiotic relationship between the plants, fish, and bacteria / worms creates an environment where all the living elements thrive. This article is a guide to some of what you need to know to grow plants and fish successfully in a media-based aquaponic system. It is not intended to be comprehensive, but rather is a high level overview of some of the basic things you need to know in order to start an aquaponics system of your own. We will go into more depth on each of these subject in upcoming newsletters, so watch for them in your inbox! We are passionate about aquaponic gardening here at The Aquaponic Source™, and we hope that you will find a passion for aquaponic gardening gardening as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Agriculture of the Green Revolution States: Implications for Agricultural Development
    Aerie. Econ. Res. Rev., Vol. 5(1), 1992 CHANGES IN AGRICULTURE OF THE GREEN REVOLUTION STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT SURESH PAL*, MRUTHYUNJAYA* AND PRATAP S. BIRTHAL** ABSTRACT This paper examines the changes in the agriculture of green revolution states. The results revealed that a decrease in the share of agriculture in state domestic product was not accompanied by appropriate fall in the workers in agriculture. Consequently, man-land ratio increased over time, markedly in West U.P. The share of purchased and energy based inputs has increased over the years and formed about 50 per cent of the operational cost. The share of capital in gross value added was substantially higher than that of human labour in the production of wheat, whereas the share of capital and human labour was almost equal in the case of paddy. A sharp decline in the returns to management in the production of wheat calls for developing cost saving technology and reappraisal of price policy. The adoption of new seed-fertilizer based technology and large capital investment (both private and public) in key inputs, particularly in irrigation, have ushered in the "Green Revolution"(GR) in India in the mid-sixties. Consequently, crop production has registered an impressive growth. Because of strong input-output linkages in modern technology, the growth in agriculture was also accompanied by the overall economic development (Bhalla et a!, 1990). However, certain issues relating to structure of agriculture have become important in the period of green revolution which need attention. The new technology is suspected on the ground that while transforming the subsistence agriculture into commer- cial farming, it may induce the well-off farmers to accumulate more and more land through tenancy eviction, purchasing land from marginal and small farmers and encroaching on commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenge of Landscape
    The Challenge of Landscape THE DEVELOPMENT AND PRACTICE OF KEYLINE * * * by P. A. YEOMANS PUBLISHED BY KEYLINE PUBLISHING PTY. LIMITED 117 PITT STREET SYDNEY AUSTRALIA Downloaded from a public source, reformatted and corrected in 2014 to a document by Geoffrey Booth for Keyline Archive. www.youtube.com/channel/UCUPgPJZAlkxt207sxcdp4DQ/about THIS BOOK IS WHOLLY SET UP AND PRINTED IN AUSTRALIA BY WAITE & BULL PTY. LIMITED, 486 ELIZABETH ST., SYDNEY. REGISTERED AT THE GENERAL POST OFFICE, SYDNEY, FOR TRANSMISSION THROUGH THE POST AS A BOOK. 1958 COPYRIGHT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS BOOK IS PRESENTED AT SOIL AND HEALTH LIBRARY WITH THE SPECIFIC AND DIRECT PERMISSION OF ALLAN YEOMANS DEDICATION THIS BOOK is dedicated to the Trustees of the Keyline (Research) Foundation in appreciation of their willing co-operation and valuable support in the cause of Keyline. The Trustees of the Foundation are: SIR C. STANTON HICKS (Vice-President) D. R. MCCAUGHEY (Vice-President) C. R. McKERIHAN (Treasurer) PROFESSOR J. R. A. MCMILLAN DR. G. B. S. FALKINER JOHN DARLING MY WIFE AND MYSELF On the formation of the Foundation I was appointed President, and Harold N. Sarina accepted the position of Honorary Secretary. The real beginning of the work which led to Keyline was in 1944, our first full year on "Yobarnie", when my brother-in-law manager lost his life in the bush fire. So for my wife the early association with the whole project was one of deep bereavement, and but for her willingness to continue then, Keyline would not have originated. * * * SIR C. STANTON HICKS is Professor of Human Physiology and Pharmacology at the University of Adelaide; is widely known in England, the United States of America, as well as in Australasia for his interests in land development.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Management Among Small-Scale Farmers in Semi-Arid Lands: Building on Traditional Knowledge and Agroecology
    Annals of Arid Zone 44(3&4): 365-385, 2005 Natural Resource Management among Small-scale Farmers in Semi-arid Lands: Building on Traditional Knowledge and Agroecology Miguel A. Altieri1 and Vìctor M. Toledo2 1 Department of Environmental Science Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, USA 2 Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autònoma de Mèxico Abstract: Although risk and uncertainty dominate the lives of most rural inhabitants of the semi-arid regions of the world, many farmers have been able to develop durable farming systems through the use of innovative soil and water management systems and the use of locally adapted crop species and varieties. In this paper we provide examples of farming systems developed by traditional farmers well adapted to the local conditions of the semi-arid environment, enabling farmers to generate sustained yields meeting their subsistence needs, despite harsh conditions and low use of external inputs. Part of this performance is linked to the ingenious soil and water conservation systems but also to the high levels of agrobiodiversity exhibited by traditional agroecosystems, which in turn positively influences agroecosystem function. We also give examples of projects aimed at assisting rainfed resource-poor farmers in the development of a variety of practical techniques and strategies to enhance production and resiliency in the midst of resource constraints typical of semi-arid environments. Many of these efforts use elements of modern science but that build upon
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Ecological Risk Assessment and Economic Analysis in Watersheds: a Conceptual Approach and Three Case Studies
    EPA/600/R-03/140R September 2003 Integrating Ecological Risk Assessment and Economic Analysis in Watersheds: A Conceptual Approach and Three Case Studies National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH DISCLAIMER This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ABSTRACT This document reports on a program of research to investigate the integration of ecological risk assessment (ERA) and economics, with an emphasis on the watershed as the scale for analysis. In 1993, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency initiated watershed ERA (W- ERA) in five watersheds to evaluate the feasibility and utility of this approach. In 1999, economic case studies were funded in conjunction with three of those W-ERAs: the Big Darby Creek watershed in central Ohio; the Clinch Valley (Clinch and Powell River watersheds) in southwestern Virginia and northeastern Tennessee; and the central Platte River floodplain in Nebraska. The ecological settings, and the analytical approaches used, differed among the three locations, but each study introduced economists to the ERA process and required the interpretation of ecological risks in economic terms. A workshop was held in Cincinnati, OH in 2001 to review progress on those studies, to discuss environmental problems involving other watershed settings, and to discuss the ideal characteristics of a generalized approach for conducting studies of this type. Based on the workshop results, a conceptual approach for the integration of ERA and economic analysis in watersheds was developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Farming Systems and Sustainable Agriculture in France P
    Integrated Farming Systems and Sustainable Agriculture in France P. Viaux Technical Institute of Cereals and Forages (ITCF), Boigneville, France Abstract The concept of sustainable agriculture includes important components of economic, environmental, agricultural and social sustainability. To obtain a better under-standing of the concept and interactions of these components, trials were implemented in 1990 in different agroecological regions by ITCF and ACTA to compare the performance of conventional farming systems (CFS) with integrated farming systems (IFS). CFS is a cropping system that is commonly employed by many farmers and requires substantial off-farm inputs such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides. IFS is a low input system which attempts to minimize environmental impacts. Trials were established on farms of 15 to 75 hectares using large plots of 1 to 5 hectares to better evaluate the system’s feasibility, and its economic and environmental parameters. After four years, results for the IFS have shown that a significant reduction in production inputs and costs (25 to 37%) are possible, especially for agrichemicals. Compared with CFS, IFS strategies may lead to lower crop yields (up to 30%) although the economic net return is often higher because of lower production costs. However, studies will continue because there are many aspects of IFS that need to be improved to enhance the system’s economic viability, including intercropping, reduced tillage, and non-chemical weed and pest control. Introduction Agricultural productivity in France has made tremendous progress in the last 30 years, during which time crop yields have more than doubled. Nevertheless, these technological advances have not been achieved without great cost to the environment and to society.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Significance of Riparian Agroecosystems with Special Reference to Influence on Wetland Livelihood
    [ VOLUME 6 I ISSUE 2 I APRIL– JUNE 2019] E ISSN 2348 –1269, PRINT ISSN 2349-5138 Environmental Significance of Riparian Agroecosystems with special reference to Influence on Wetland Livelihood Dr. Reshma J.K.1 & Dr. Allan Thomas2 1Asst. Professor and Head, PG Department of Environmental Sciences All Saints’ College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. 2Asst. Professor and Head, Department of Extension College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Kerala. Received: February 12, 2019 Accepted: March 24, 2019 INTRODUCTION Riparian Agroecosystem (Agriculture + Ecosystem = Agroecosystem) is construed as a spatially and functionally coherent unit of agricultural activity along river banks, subsuming both biotic & abiotic components, their respective interaction as well. An agroecosystem appends the region that is stuffed in by agricultural activity, prodigally by changes to the complexity ofspecies assemblagesandenergy flows, as well as to the net nutrient balance. Traditionally an agroecosystem, particularly one managed intensively, is epitomized as having a simpler species composition and simpler energy and nutrient flows which makes it unique from other "natural" ecosystems. Moreover, agroecosystems are often confederated with elevated nutrient input, as in the case of forest gardens, probably the world's oldest and most resilient agroecosystemswhich is balanced byeutrophication of consociated ecosystems not directly engaged in agriculture. Substaintial components of Agroecosystem derive all its energy requirements from solar input along with atmospheric and human inputs that come from outside the system, which are referred to as “consumption and markets. Some of the unparagoned features of agroecosystems are monoculture, use of genetically modified organisms and artificially selected crops, row crops, increased soil aeration, simplification of biodiversity and maintenance at an early succession state.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Handout for Introduction to Forest Gardening
    COURSE HANDOUT FOR INTRODUCTION TO FOREST GARDENING Complied by Jess Clynewood and Rich Wright Held at Coed Hills Rural Art Space 2010 ETHICS AND PRINCIPLES OF PERMACULTURE Care for the Earth v Care for the people v Fair shares PRINCIPLES Make the least change for the greatest effect v Mistakes are tools for learning v The only limits to the yield of a system are imagination and understanding Observation – Protracted and thoughtful observation rather than prolonged and thoughtless action. Observation is a key tool to re-learn. We need to know what is going on already so that we don’t make changes we will later regret. Use and value diversity - Diversity allows us to build a strong web of beneficial connections. Monocultures are incredibly fragile and prone to pests and diseases – diverse systems are far more robust and are intrinsically more resilient. Relative Location and Beneficial Connections – View design components not in isolation but as part of a holistic system. Place elements to maximise their potential to create beneficial connections with other elements. Multi-functional Design – Try and gain as many yields or outputs from each element in your design as possible. Meet every need in multiple ways, as many elements supporting each important function creates stability and resilience. Perennial systems – minimum effort for maximum gain Create no waste - The concept of waste is essentially a reflection of poor design. Every output from one system could become the input to another system. We need to think cyclically rather than in linear systems. Unmet needs = work, unused output = pollution. Stacking – Make use of vertical as well as horizontal space, filling as many niches as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Robotics: the Future of Robotic Agriculture
    UK-RAS White papers © UK-RAS 2018 ISSN 2398-4422 DOI 10.31256/WP2018.2 Agricultural Robotics: The Future of Robotic Agriculture www.ukras.org // Agricultural Robotics Agricultural Robotics // UKRAS.ORG // Agricultural Robotics FOREWORD Welcome to the UK-RAS White Paper the automotive and aerospace sectors wider community and stakeholders, as well Series on Robotics and Autonomous combined. Agri-tech companies are already as policy makers, in assessing the potential Systems (RAS). This is one of the core working closely with UK farmers, using social, economic and ethical/legal impact of activities of UK-RAS Network, funded by technology, particularly robotics and AI, to RAS in agriculture. the Engineering and Physical Sciences help create new technologies and herald Research Council (EPSRC). new innovations. This is a truly exciting It is our plan to provide annual updates time for the industry as there is a growing for these white papers so your feedback By bringing together academic centres of recognition that the significant challenges is essential - whether it is to point out excellence, industry, government, funding facing global agriculture represent unique inadvertent omissions of specific areas of bodies and charities, the Network provides opportunities for innovation, investment and development that need to covered, or to academic leadership, expands collaboration commercial growth. suggest major future trends that deserve with industry while integrating and further debate and in-depth analysis. Please coordinating activities at EPSRC funded This white paper aims to provide an direct all your feedback to whitepaper@ RAS capital facilities, Centres for Doctoral overview of the current impact and ukras.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Ecosystem Services of Agroecosystems Along the Wasatch Front, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 8-2020 Cultural Ecosystem Services of Agroecosystems Along the Wasatch Front, Utah Tiffany K. Woods Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Design Commons, and the Landscape Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Woods, Tiffany K., "Cultural Ecosystem Services of Agroecosystems Along the Wasatch Front, Utah" (2020). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7904. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7904 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF AGROECOSYSTEMS ALONG THE WASATCH FRONT, UTAH by Tiffany K. Woods A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Bioregional Planning Approved: __________________________ __________________________ Brent Chamberlain, Ph.D. Arthur J. Caplan, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member __________________________ __________________________ Sarah C. Klain, Ph.D. Janis L. Boettinger, Ph.D. Committee Member Acting Vice Provost of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2020 ii Copyright Tiffany K. Woods 2020 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Cultural ecosystem services of agroecosystems along the Wasatch Front, Utah by Tiffany K. Woods, Master of Science Utah State University, 2020 Major Professor: Brent Chamberlain, Ph.D. Department: Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning Agroecosystems, including peri-urban systems, are important providers of a range of services. However, management of these systems has generally been based on the market value of crops, neglecting to capture the broader public goods that ecosystem services provide to stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippines Impact of the Green Revolution on Agriculture Rice: the Primary Crop Major Events of the Green Revolution
    The Philippines Impact of the Green Revolution on Agriculture Rice: The Primary Crop Major Events of the Green Revolution • 1960s- the government of the Republic of the Philippines with the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation established IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) • 1962- the IRRI crossed Dee-Geo-woo-gen and Peta rice strains • 1968- IR8, or “miracle rice,” was formed • 1981- the use of miracle rice reaches 81% of total rice crops Benefits • IR8, “miracle rice,” produced ten times the amount of rice as traditional varieties • As a result of the switch to farming IR8, annual rice production in the Philippines increased from 3.7 to 7.7 million tons in 2 decades • The large increase in rice production allowed the Philippines to become an exporter of rice for the first time in the 20th century Environmental and Agricultural Problems • Chemical fertilizers used in conjunction with miracle rice eroded soil • Increased rice production led to increased water consumption • Pesticides and fertilizers used in rice farming polluted water and caused siltation • Declining water quality poses a threat to future rice production, due to the high amount of clean water required to grow rice • The Philippines did not have sufficient funding to improve irrigation systems→ fell behind neighboring countries • Vulnerable to recurring natural disasters, which posed a large threat to the agriculture-based economy Rice Production Afterwards • 1973- the Philippines experienced domestic/international problems causing a downfall in economic
    [Show full text]