Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY Transport Assessment
70043297-TA APRIL 2018 CONFIDENTIAL Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY Transport Assessment
TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) CONFIDENTIAL
PROJECT NO. 70043297 OUR REF. NO. 70043297-TA
DATE: APRIL 2018
WSP The Victoria 150-182 The Quays Salford, Manchester M50 3SP Phone: +44 161 886 2400 Fax: +44 161 886 2401 WSP.com QUALITY CONTROL
Issue/revision First issue Final Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Draft Final Date Prepared by D Skinner D Skinner
Signature
Checked by A Purrier A Purrier
Signature
Authorised by I Hughes I Hughes
Signature
Project number 70043297
Report number 1 File reference 70043297-TA
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.2 SCOPING 1 1.3 REPORT STRUCTURE 2
2 POLICY CONTEXT 3
2.1 INTRODUCTION 3 2.2 LOCAL POLICY AND GUIDANCE 3 High Peak Local Plan (HPBC, 2016) 3 High Peak Local Plan Transport Study (DCC, 2014) 4 Derbyshire Local Transport Plan 2011 – 2026 (DCC, 2011) 4 Derbyshire Infrastructure Plan (DCC, 2013) 5 Longdendale Integrated Transport Strategy (Tameside Council, 2009) 5 High Peak Design Guide SPD (HPBC, 2018) 5 2.3 NATIONAL POLICY AND GUIDANCE 6 National Planning Policy Framework (DCLG, 2012) 6 Manual for Streets and Manual for Street 2 – Application of the Wider Principles 6
3 SITE LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY 8
3.2 SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING USAGE 8 3.3 SURROUNDING HIGHWAY NETWORK 8 3.4 WALKING LINKS 8 3.5 CYCLING LINKS 9 3.6 BUS SERVICES 10 3.7 RAIL SERVICES 11 3.8 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT DATA ANALYSIS 12
4 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS 14
4.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 14 4.3 VEHICLE ACCESS STRATEGY AND PARKING 14
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
4.4 SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE 14 Travel Plan 15
5 TRAFFIC FLOW ANALYSIS 16
5.2 TRAFFIC FLOW SCENARIOS 16 5.3 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION 16 5.4 FUTURE YEARS AND COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT 16 5.5 VEHICLE TRIP RATES AND TRAFFIC GENERATION 17 5.6 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT 17
6 JUNCTION ASSESSMENT 19
6.2 STUDY AREA 19 6.3 CAPACITY PARAMETERS AND MODELLING SOFTWARE 19 6.4 PROPOSED SITE ACCESS (GLOSSOP ROAD) 19 6.5 GLOSSOP ROAD / MELANDRA CASTLE ROAD 20 6.6 GLOSSOP ROAD / ORCHARD DRIVE 20 6.7 GLOSSOP ROAD / COTTAGE LANE 21 6.8 SUMMARY 22
7 SUMMARY 23
FIGURES Figure 1 – Site Location Plan 1 Figure 2 - Pedestrian Accessibility 9 Figure 3 - Cycling Accessibility 10
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1.1. WSP have been appointed by Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd to provide highways and transportation planning support with respect to their planning application for residential development at Glossop Road, Gamesley (High Peak, Derbyshire). 1.1.2. The site is located approximately 20km east of Manchester City Centre. As shown by Figure 1 it is south of Glossop Road, adjacent to the Hadfield – Glossop railway line. Figure 1 – Site Location Plan
1.1.3. The site currently comprises open fields and agricultural land, and industrial units of the former Samas Roneo warehouse vacated in 2002. 1.1.4. It is proposed that the plot be developed to comprise approximately 155 dwellings (119 houses and 36 apartments) with vehicular access via a priority junction with Glossop Road, approximately 75m west of Melandra Castle Road. 1.1.5. This Transport Assessment (TA) has been prepared to assess the development in terms of transport and highways. A Framework Travel Plan (FTP) has also been prepared in support of the development proposals. 1.1.6. Notably the site was granted planning permission in 2011 for 93 dwellings on the eastern 2.81ha of the site (including the industrial units). 1.2 SCOPING 1.2.1. Scoping discussions have been undertaken with the Local Highway Authority, Derbyshire County Council (DCC) and Local Planning Authority, High Peak Borough Council (HPBC) with regard of the content of the TA and FTP.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 1 of 24
1.2.2. The Scoping Note of 30th January 2018, included at Appendix A, was submitted to DCC to provide highways officers with the intended approach that will be adopted in the highways and transport assessment with respect to the development proposals. The scope was further discussed within the emails included at Appendix A. 1.2.3. As a result of the scoping discussions, this report comprises: An overview of the relevant local and national policies; A summary of the site with respect to location, existing usage and sustainable travel opportunities; Details of the highway network surrounding the site including a review of Personal Injury Accident (PIA) data; An overview of the development proposals, including the quantum of development and means of access; and A trip generation and highway network assessment. 1.3 REPORT STRUCTURE 1.3.1. Following this introduction: Chapter 2 provides an overview of the relevant local and national policies; Chapter 3 summarises the site with respect to location, existing site usage and the local highway network (including PIA analysis); Chapter 4 sets out the development proposals; Chapter 5 details the traffic flow analysis undertaken, including the trip generation, distribution and assignment analyses; Chapter 6 sets out the junction capacity analyses undertaken; and Chapter 7 summarises the report.
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 2 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
2 POLICY CONTEXT
2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.1.1. This chapter sets out an overview of the local and national transport policy to provide context for the Glossop Road development proposals. 2.2 LOCAL POLICY AND GUIDANCE HIGH PEAK LOCAL PLAN (HPBC, 2016) 2.2.1. The High Peak Local Plan, adopted April 2016, aims to guide the development within the High Peak Borough for the period up to 2031, providing a strategic framework against which land use planning decisions can be made. It identifies land use and development issues facing High Peak Borough and considers social, economic, and environmental characteristics, as well as providing links to the adjacent boundary areas of Derbyshire and Tameside (as part of the Greater Manchester Spatial area). 2.2.2. There is a focus on the relation between continued growth and development of the major market towns while also retaining the characteristics and communities of the Peak District. From this, 12 strategic objectives have been developed, and provide the framework for the development of the strategy. The relevant strategic objectives are outlined below: SO1 – Protect, create, and enhance the Green Infrastructure Network; SO3 – Ensure new development is well designed, promoted local distinctiveness and integrates effectively with its setting; SO6 – Welcome development that supports the sustainable growth and diversification of the local economy, including the mixed-use development of industrial legacy sites; SO9 – Provide an appropriate mix of housing types, sizes and tenures in sustainable and accessible locations that meets the needs of all residents in the Borough; SO10 – Protect existing, and support the delivery of new services, facilities and infrastructure that improve accessibility and connectivity; SO11 – Promote opportunities for healthy lifestyles and support developments that minimise risks to health; and SO12 – Encourage the efficient use of previously developed land and buildings whilst minimising the use of Greenfield land. 2.2.3. Glossopdale is noted as being one of the three major areas within High Peak, with the Local Plan Policy S5 outlining the sustainability and growth of Glossop, including: Promoting and maintaining the distinct identity of the settlements which make up Glossopdale; Providing for the housing needs of the community by planning for sustainability housing and mixed use developments; and Supporting enhancements to key community services and infrastructure and connectivity to meet the needs of the local population and support growth. 2.2.4. Chapter 3 of this TA demonstrates the accessibility of the site to sustainable modes. Chapters 5 and 6 consider the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding highway network. 2.2.5. The Local Plan also contains the parking standards for High Peak, as presented in Table 1. Table 1 - High Peak Parking Guidance
Dwelling Type Standards 1 Bed Dwelling 1.5 spaces per unit. 1 cycle parking space per unit if no garage or shed is provided. 2 bed – 1.5 spaces per unit; 3 bed – 2 spaces per unit. 1 cycle parking space per unit 2 / 3 Bed Dwelling if no garage or shed is provided. 4+ Bed Dwellings 3 spaces per unit. 1 cycle parking space per unit if no garage or shed is provided.
2.2.6. The proposed parking provision is detailed in Chapter 4 in consideration of this guidance.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 3 of 24
HIGH PEAK LOCAL PLAN TRANSPORT STUDY (DCC, 2014) 2.2.7. DCC assisted HPBC in preparing their local plan outside of the Peak District National Park, also identifying the location of local neighbourhood plans for the major towns in the region. It identifies five transport goals, including: Supporting a resilient local economy; Tackling Climate Change; Contributing to better safety, security and health; Promoting equality of opportunity; and Improving quality of life and promoting a healthy natural environment. 2.2.8. Within the Local Transport Study, one of the areas noted as being possibly affected by increased developments is within Gamesley, notably the junction of the A626 Glossop Road and Melandra Castle Road. This junction is highlighted due to the contemporaneous planning application for development on the adjacent site, for which this TA is now applicable. It is stated that, “As part of a planning consent for this building, the junction access will be modified”. Additionally; “There is a considerable area of highway verge that would not constrain a significant improvement to this junction, or introduction of traffic signal control were it to be required. An initial indicative cost of introducing traffic signal control… would be estimated to be £200,000.” 2.2.9. In accordance with the above the Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road has been assessed, as summarised in Chapter 5. DERBYSHIRE LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN 2011 – 2026 (DCC, 2011) 2.2.10. Due to the location of the site being within the borough of High Peak and within Derbyshire, the Derbyshire Local Transport Plan is applicable to development on the site. The Local Transport Plan states that its main goals and challenges facing the region include: Supporting a resilient local economy; Tackling climate change; Contributing to better safety, security and health; Promoting equality of opportunity; and Improving quality of life and promoting a healthy natural environment. 2.2.11. The Plan identifies major projects that “must entail careful consideration of their relative performances in terms of the LTP outcomes in order to achieve value for money.” The plan goes on to state its key transport and investment priorities are: Well maintained roads and rights of way: Improving resilience to and reducing disruption caused by climate change; and Carbon reduction. Efficient transport network management: Reducing congestion and delays for all road users; On street parking, loading and waiting control, and Travel information. Improving local accessibility and achieving healthier travel habits: Community transport services; Rail, including community rail initiatives; Minimising disruption from public transport service cuts; Personalised travel advice for disadvantaged people; Rural accessibility; Independent travel training; and Public transport (bus and rail) information. Better safety and security: Reducing vulnerable road user casualties (child, pedestrians, pedal cyclists); Reducing motorcyclist casualties; and
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 4 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
Small-scale community safety improvements. A considered approach to new infrastructure: Infrastructure and services linked with new land use developments; Walking and cycling provision; Public transport and freight provision; Environmental assessment, mitigation and enhancement measures; and Liaison between spatial and transport planning on an ongoing basis. DERBYSHIRE INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN (DCC, 2013) 2.2.12. The Derbyshire Infrastructure Plan focuses on the strategic infrastructure throughout Derbyshire and provides and overview for local planning authorities regarding local infrastructure delivery plans. It identifies the strategic priorities to be focused on throughout the county. 2.2.13. Included within these priorities is the requirement of improvements to highways, community and public transport, making reference to the potential for a new railways station at Gamesley, adjacent to the Glossop Road development site, stating that it is a strategic priority project that should be part of any mitigation package pursued by Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (as identified in the Longdendale Integrated Transport Strategy). 2.2.14. Regarding Community Transport, the plans states that DCC is committed to a contribution of £100,000 towards the purchase of community transport vehicles to improve access to key local services from new developments in Derbyshire. 2.2.15. The document also makes note of improvements to PRoW throughout Derbyshire, including the Pennine Bridleway National Trail, which passes to the east of the site on the same alignment as National Cycle Route 68 and 62, as is summarised in Chapter 3. LONGDENDALE INTEGRATED TRANSPORT STRATEGY (TAMESIDE COUNCIL, 2009) 2.2.16. In 2009 Tameside Council approved the development of a transport strategy for the Longdendale area. It recommended multiple methods of increasing the public and private transport links to the local area and Manchester City Centre. These recommendations included: A new bypass from the A57 Hyde Road / M67 junction avoiding the A57 / B6174, A57 Mottram Moor, A628 / A57, and A57 Woolley Lane junctions; Bus improvements including bus lanes, new / improved bus stops, improved pedestrian routes to the stops, improved service provision, higher quality vehicles, and improved information; Rail improvements including improved stations, timetabling, park and ride opportunities, improved pedestrian routes to stations, and improved rolling stock; Traffic management improvements to optimise the use of the highway network for all modes of traffic; ‘Smarter Choices’ travel initiatives linked to the existing / future travel plans including sustainable travel publicity campaigns, education initiatives, and travel awareness campaigns; Cycling and pedestrian improvements including cycle lanes and cycle parking opportunities; Traffic calming and road safety improvements throughout the area on both distributor roads and in residential areas; and Streetscape improvements including footway, streetlight, and carriageway maintenance and improvements. It must be noted that in 2014 the Highways Agency (now Highways England) approved the Mottram Bypass and a spur to Glossop, although no start date has been announced. HIGH PEAK DESIGN GUIDE SPD (HPBC, 2018) 2.2.17. The High Peak Design Guide SPD, adopted February 2018, was produced to define the design characteristics of High Peak, with an application for new developments in the area. The design guide states that good design “should maximise accessibility, ensure sustainability in terms of fuel efficiency and sensitivity to climate change and should be robust in terms of allowing future adaptation to other uses”. 2.2.18. These principles should guide all stages of a developments’ design, including materials, orientation, and energy and water usage. The settings of developments, particularly those on the edge of settlements such as the Glossop Road site, should sit comfortably within the landscape, and contain a distinct character that reflects and respects the surround existing settlements.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 5 of 24
2.3 NATIONAL POLICY AND GUIDANCE NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK (DCLG, 2012) 2.3.1. Adopted on 27th March 2012, the Department for Communities and Local Government’s (DCLG) National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) sets out the Government’s planning policies for England and how there are expected to be applied. 2.3.2. The NPPF replaces the majority of previous Planning Policy Guidance Notes and Statements, becoming the definitive national planning guidance from which local planning authorities can, in collaboration with their communities, produce local plans appropriate to the character and needs of their area. 2.3.3. It sets out a presumption in favour of sustainable development which should be delivered with three main dimensions: economic, social and environmental (Paragraphs 7 and 14). Transport is able to contribute significantly to a development’s adherence to these, through means such as providing infrastructure to support economic growth, enhancing accessibility to services and fulfilling the social needs of people and providing solutions which minimise pollution and environmental impact. 2.3.4. The NPPF sets aims for a transport system balanced in favour of sustainable transport modes in order to give people a real choice about how they travel and encourages solutions which support reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and reduce congestion (Paragraphs 29 and 30). 2.3.5. Relating to facilitating economic growth, Paragraph 32 of the NPPF states that “All developments that generate significant amounts of movement should be supported by a Transport Statement or Transport Assessment. Plans and decisions should take into account of whether: The opportunities for sustainable transport modes have been taken up depending on the nature and location of the site, to reduce the need for a major infrastructure; Safe and suitable access to the site can be achieved for all people; and Improvements can be undertaken with the transport network that cost-effectively limits the significant impacts of the development. Development should only be prevented or refused on transport grounds where the residual cumulative impacts of development are severe.” 2.3.6. Paragraph 34 of the NPPF states that “Developments which generate significant movement should be located where the need for travel will be minimised and the use of sustainable transport modes can be maximised.” 2.3.7. Paragraph 35 states that “Developments should be located and designed where practical to: Accommodate the efficient delivery of goods and supplies; Give priority to pedestrian and cycle movements, and have access to high quality public transport facilities; Create safe and secure layout which minimise conflicts between traffic and cyclists or pedestrians, avoiding street clutter and where appropriate establishing home zones; Incorporate facilities for charging plug-in and other ultra-low emission vehicles; and Consider the needs of people with disabilities by all modes of transport.” 2.3.8. This TA seeks to demonstrate where appropriate how the proposed development accords with the NPPF. 2.3.9. Paragraph 36 of the NPPF notes that Travel Plans are a key tool and should be provided where developments generate significant amounts of movement. As stated, an FTP has been prepared in support of the development proposals. MANUAL FOR STREETS AND MANUAL FOR STREET 2 – APPLICATION OF THE WIDER PRINCIPLES 2.3.10. Manual for Streets (MfS) was jointly published in 2007 by the DfT and Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). It provides guidance on the design of residential streets and its aims are: To help build and strengthen the communities; That streets meet the needs of all users, by embodying the principles of inclusive design; That streets form part of a well-connected network; That streets are attractive and have their own distinctive identity; That streets are cost effective to construct and maintain; and That streets are safe.
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 6 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
2.3.11. MfS2 was published in September 2010 by the Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation (CIHT). It does not supersede the guidance in MfS, but explains how the principles can be applied on the wider highway network. 2.3.12. With respect to the applicability to the proposed development, Paragraph 1.3.2 of MfS2 recommends that MfS should be the starting point for any scheme affecting non-truck roads. Paragraph 1.3.3 further recommends that DMRB (Design Manual for Roads and Bridges) or other standards should only be used where the guidance in MfS is not sufficient or where particular evidence suggests that MfS is no applicable. 2.3.13. The development proposals identified in Chapter 4, in particular the masterplan have been prepared in such a way as to respect the character of the existing area and ensure that the development attractively fits in with the local environment.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 7 of 24
3 SITE LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY
3.1.1. This chapter sets out the existing situation at the development site with respect to location, usage, the local highway network and the local sustainable travel opportunities. It also provides an analysis of PIA data for the surrounding highway network. 3.2 SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING USAGE 3.2.1. As stated in Chapter 1 the site is located approximately 20km east of Manchester City Centre. It is bounded by the main residential area of Gamesley beyond Glossop Road to the north, residential properties and wooded areas to the east, and the Hadfield – Glossop railway line to the south. 3.2.2. The site currently comprises open fields and agricultural land, and industrial units of the former Samas Roneo warehouse vacated in 2002. Access to the site is currently provided via a priority crossroads with Glossop Road and Melandra Castle Road. 3.3 SURROUNDING HIGHWAY NETWORK 3.3.1. In proximity to the site Glossop Road is a street-lit A-classified (A626) single-carriageway road with a 30mph speed limit and a footway on the north side. 3.3.2. West of the site Glossop Road provides access to the residential areas of South East Manchester. Approximately 750m north east of the site Glossop Road provides access to the A57 Dinting Vale. The A57, with a speed limit of 40 mph, provides direct access to Glossop to the south and Hadfield, Hollingworth and the strategic road network to the north. 3.3.3. Opposite the site Melandra Castle Road is a street-lit single-carriageway road with a 30mph speed limit with pedestrian footways on one side. Traffic calming features were provided as part of the Gamesley Traffic Calming scheme, including the installation of speed humps. 3.3.4. Melandra Castle Road forms a loop around Gamesley, providing access to all residential areas and amenities. To the east it becomes Cottage Lane closing the loop with Glossop Road. The road also forms part of the Trans Pennine Trail and National Cycle Routes 62 and 68, as detailed in Section 3.5. 3.3.5. As part of the Longdendale Integrated Transport Study outlined in Chapter 2, there is proposals for a relief road from the M67 Junction 4 through Mottram to Hadfield, connecting to the A57. This would provide increased access to the site with respect to the strategic road network. 3.4 WALKING LINKS 3.4.1. Glossop Road has a lit footway on the north side of the carriageway providing access to Gamesley, Dinting Vale and Glossop. Approximately 350m to the east of the site, at the junction of Glossop Road and Cottage Lane, there is a central pedestrian refuge. There is also a controlled pedestrian crossing approximately 500m east of the site. 3.4.2. There are several Public Right of Way (PRoW) footpaths that allow access to the local area whilst avoiding public highway routes. Footpath HP12/8/1 provides access from the western edge of the site at the railway bridge to the town of Broadbottom, whilst Footpath HP12/65/2 provides access from the signalised A57 / A626 junction to Dinting station to the east of the site. 3.4.3. In order to demonstrate pedestrian connectivity through the surrounding area and to existing local amenities, walking isochrones have been plotted illustrating the actual distance walked as opposed to as the crow flies. These are shown by Figure 2, below and at Appendix B.1. 3.4.4. The walking isochrones have been plotted for five, 10, 15, 20 and 25 minute journey times on foot with the walking speed based on guidance given in Paragraph 3.30 in the IHT’s publication Guidelines for Providing for Journeys on Foot, which states “an average walking speed of 1.4m/s can be assumed”. The proposed site access point on Glossop Road has been used as the starting point for the isochrones.
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 8 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
Figure 2 - Pedestrian Accessibility
3.4.5. As shown in Figure 2, bus stops are accessible within a five minute walk of the site, while all of Gamesley and residential areas to the east are accessible within a five to 25 minute walk. Amenities in Gamesley include a doctor surgery, nursey and community centre, post office, a selection of small convenience shops, and a youth centre with sports facilities. Additionally, Dinting Station is within a 15 to 20 minute walk. 3.5 CYCLING LINKS 3.5.1. To the west of the site Glossop Road at the railway bridge is designated as part of NCN Route 62 and Route 68 towards Mottram and Hadfield as part of the Trans Pennine Trail. The routes are shown on the TfGM Tameside and Derbyshire Council’s cycle maps, both of which are included in Appendix B.2. 3.5.2. The Trans Pennine Trail is a 595km (approx.) route that allows cyclists to travel from Hornsea and York on the East Coast to Southport on the West coast via Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and Chesterfield. The journey is mainly traffic free with gentle gradients and well surfaced paths along its length. 3.5.3. In order to demonstrate cyclist connectivity through the surrounding area cycling isochrones have been plotted for five, 10, 15, 20 and 25 minute journey times by bicycle using a cycling speed of 4.4m/s. These are shown by Figure 3, below and at Appendix B.1.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 9 of 24
Figure 3 - Cycling Accessibility
3.5.4. As shown by Figure 3, multiple transport access points are accessible within the 25 minute cycle of the site, including six stations on the Manchester to Glossop railway line as outlined in Section 3.7. The entire residential area of Gamesley and associated amenities are accessible within a five minute journey of the site. The towns of Hadfield, Glossop, Dinting, and Broadbottom are all accessible within a five to 15 minute cycle of the site. 3.6 BUS SERVICES 3.6.1. To demonstrate the site’s accessibility by public transport, an audit has been undertaken of the existing bus services and facilities in the local area. TfGM’s Tameside Public Transport Network plan is included at Appendix B.2. 3.6.2. As identified above, bus stops are accessible within a five minute walk of the site, with local services identified in Table 2.
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 10 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
Table 2 – Bus Service Availability
No. Route Frequency
Chapel en le Frith (High School 69a 1 AM and PM service (Monday – Friday) Service) Hyde – Blackbower – Hattersley – Mottram – Broadbottom – 341 1 service each way every hour (Monday – Saturday) Charlesworth – Gamesley – Simmondley – Glossop Stepping Hill – Hazel Grove – Windlehurst – Marple – Lane 394 Ends – Ernocroft – Charlesworth 1 service each way every 2 hours (Monday – Friday) – Gamesley – Dinting Vale – Glossop Longdendale (High School 842 1 AM and PM service (Monday – Friday) Service)
3.6.3. The bus services to and from the site include an hourly service to Hyde and Glossop (341), a service to Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport (394) and two services to local educational establishments (69a and 842). These services provide the site with a material alternative to journeys by private car to a range of local destinations. 3.7 RAIL SERVICES 3.7.1. In addition to bus services in proximity to the site, there are also a number of railways stations that can be reached on foot, by bicycle or bus. Table 3 identifies stations within a 25 minute cycle of the site, their available sustainable transport facilities, including cycle parking, and additional bus services to the east of Manchester and the Peak District. Table 3 – Facilities Available at Local Stations
Cycle Pedestrian / Cycling Station Car Parking Connections Facilities Accessibility Pedestrian – 15 mins Dinting - 25 spaces Bus: 69B, 393 Cycle – 5 mins Bus: 61, 68, 69a, 237, 237N, 12 stands, Glossop 26 spaces 341, 351, 390, 393, 394, Cycle – 10 mins CCTV DCB Hadfield 8 stands 15 spaces Bus: 69b, 237, 237N Cycle – 10 mins 6 stands, Broadbottom 53 spaces Bus: 341, 842 Cycle – 15 mins CCTV.
3.7.2. The stations listed are managed by Northern, with regular commuter services towards Manchester Piccadilly, from which services across the UK are available. There are two services per hour provided in each direction from Dinting. 3.7.3. As shown in the Longdendale Integrated Transport Study, there is provision for a railway station at Gamesley, which would be situated adjacent to the site, providing frequent and easy access for future residents to Glossop and Manchester Piccadilly.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 11 of 24
3.8 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT DATA ANALYSIS 3.8.1. An analysis of PIA data has been carried out on the local highway network surrounding the site in order to establish if there are any patterns in location or causation factors which may be exacerbated as a result of the proposed development with respect to all road users. 3.8.2. PIA data for the latest five year period available has been obtained from Derbyshire Police, up to and including August 2017. 3.8.3. The Institution of Highways and Transportation (IHT) publication ‘Transport in the Urban Environment’ (1997), ‘Section 7.4 – Recording of Collisions’, provides the following definitions regarding the classification of PIAs: Slight Injuries – Injuries of a minor nature, such as sprains, bruises, or cuts not judged to be severe, or slight shock requiring only roadside attention (medical treatment is not a prerequisite for an injury to be defined as slight); Serious Injuries – Injuries for which a person is detailed in hospital, as an in-patient, or any of the following injuries, whether or not a person is detained in hospital; fractures, concussion, internal injuries, severe cuts and lacerations, severe general shock requiring medical treatment and injuries which result in death 30 days after the Collision. The serious category, therefore, covers a very broad range of injuries (it is estimated that up to 50% of people with reported serious injuries are not detained in hospital); and Fatal Injuries – Injuries which cause death either immediately or any time up to 30 days after the Collision. 3.8.4. A total of six PIAs were recorded on the surrounding highway network, of which two were classified as serious and four as slight. No fatal PIAs were recorded. No PIAs involved a pedestrian and one involved a cyclist. 3.8.5. A plot of the PIA locations within the identified area of study is included in Appendix B.3, as provided by Derbyshire Police. A summary of the recorded PIAs is provided in Table 4 and the subsequent paragraphs. Table 4 - PIA Data Summary
Inv. Inv. Link / Junction Total Slight Serious Fatal Ped. Cyclist Links Glossop Road 2 1 1 - - - Junctions Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road 3 2 1 - - 1 Glossop Road / Cottage Lane / Orchard 1 1 - - - - Drive Total 6 4 2 - - 1
Glossop Road 3.8.6. A total of two PIAs were recorded on Glossop Road between Melandra Castle Road and Cottage, one classified as slight and one as serious. The serious accident occurred when a vehicle travelling southbound collided with a parked vehicle. The slight incident occurred when a vehicle waiting to pull onto the carriageway from a driveway collided with a vehicle heading north east in wet conditions. Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road 3.8.7. A total of three PIAs were recorded at the priority junction of Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road, one classified as serious and two classified as slight. The serious incident occurred when a vehicle turning into Melandra Castle Road lost control and skidded, with conditions noted at wet, raining and high winds. The two slight incidents occurred as vehicles turned out of Melandra Castle Road onto Glossop Road, colliding with vehicles on the main carriageway. Glossop Road / Cottage Lane 3.8.8. A single PIA was recorded at the junction of Glossop Road / Cottage Lane, in which a vehicle collided with a pedestrian as it was travelling through the junction on Glossop Road.
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 12 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
Summary 3.8.9. There are considered to be no significant patterns in location or causation factors which may be exacerbated as a result of the development proposals. On the bases of this analysis it is considered that no mitigation is required with respect to road safety; the PIA data suggests that there are no material defects or safety issues.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 13 of 24
4 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
4.1.1. This chapter sets out the development proposals including details of the means of access, parking, and sustainable infrastructure. 4.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 4.2.1. The development is proposed to provide 119 two, three and 4 bed houses, and 36 one and two bed apartments. 4.2.2. The architectural Masterplan prepared by JDA Architects is included at Appendix C.1. 4.3 VEHICLE ACCESS STRATEGY AND PARKING 4.3.1. It is proposed that the primary vehicular access to the development be via a priority junction with Glossop Road, approximately 75m west of Melandra Castle Road. The preliminary design of this arrangement is shown by Figure SK-002 at Appendix C.2. 4.3.2. As shown the proposed junction has a right turn ghost-island in the shadow of a proposed pedestrian refuge island immediately east of the access. Visibility is shown to be achievable from 2.4m to 60m in both directions. The proposals are such that the existing westbound bus stop on Glossop Road would require relocating approximately 75m from its current location east of the proposed site access to as suitable distance west of the site access, with the precise location to be agreed in liaison with DCC at detailed design. 4.3.3. The proposals have been developed based on an approved preliminary design prepared in 2011 and subsequent planning conditions, specifically Condition 9: “Prior to occupation of the 10th dwelling, the permanent estate street junction shall be formed to Glossop Road in accordance with the revised application drawings (Staggered Site Access Junction - figure 01, indicating a central pedestrian refuge), laid out, constructed to base level and provided with 2.4m x 60m visibility splays in either direction, the area in advance of the sightlines being levelled, constructed as footway and not being included in any plot or other sub-division of the site.” 4.3.4. As such, the proposed primary vehicular access arrangement is considered to be appropriate. 4.3.5. In addition to the primary vehicular access, as shown by architectural Masterplan, there is proposed to be a private access to serve approximately four dwellings at the western end of the site. This is considered to be appropriate for so few dwellings and is in keeping with similar access arrangements on Glossop Road. 4.3.6. Furthermore, as also shown by the architectural Masterplan, emergency vehicle access only will also be provided via east of Melandra Castle Road, with restrictive measures to prevent general vehicular access at all other times. 4.3.7. It is intended that the access and internal roads be adopted by DCC. 4.3.8. The on-site car parking provision will be based on the standards identified in Chapter 2, including an average of one space per one-bed dwelling, 1.5 spaces per two-bed dwelling, two spaces per three-bed dwelling and three spaces per four-bed dwelling. 4.4 SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE 4.4.1. Sustainable transport measures will be implemented and promoted to encourage people to walk, cycle or use public transport. 4.4.2. The development has been designed in line with the principals of MfS which promotes layouts following a user hierarchy where the needs of pedestrians and cyclists are considered before vehicle modes. 4.4.3. It is proposed that the development will comprise a network of footways linking dwellings with key spaces and greenways throughout the site, and will then link to the wider existing sustainable infrastructure adjacent to the site. 4.4.4. Specifically, as shown by Figure SK-002, a footway link is to be provided between the primary vehicular access and perpendicular to the proposed pedestrian refuge island immediately east of the access. Pedestrian routing on the south side of Glossop Road beyond this is to be agreed in liaison with DCC at detailed design.
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 14 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
4.4.5. In consideration of the standards identified in Chapter 2, a level of cycle parking will be provided to facilitate and encourage cycling as a sustainable transport option to users of the site. As identified on the architectural Masterplan this will comprise provision within garages and rear-garden cycle sheds. TRAVEL PLAN 4.4.6. A Framework Travel Plan (FTP) has been prepared in support of the development proposals which identifies potential measures to promote the available sustainable transport options to users of the site and minimise car trips associated with the development. 4.4.7. The FTP outlines the methods in which sustainable travel to and from the proposed development can be accomplished and comprises walking measures, cycling measures, public transport measures and car sharing measures. It also includes a framework timeline through which these measures can be implemented.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 15 of 24
5 TRAFFIC FLOW ANALYSIS
5.1.1. This chapter sets out the traffic flows used to access the capacity of the surrounding highway network. This includes details of data collection, development traffic generation and distribution analyses and traffic growth assumptions. 5.2 TRAFFIC FLOW SCENARIOS 5.2.1. As agreed in scoping discussions with DCC the AM and PM peak periods of the following scenarios have been calculated: 2018 Baseline; Future Year Baseline; and Future Year with Development. 5.2.2. The methodology to derive these scenarios is described in the remainder of this chapter, with the resultant traffic flows presented in Appendix D.1. 5.3 TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION 5.3.1. WSP appointed a specialist sub-consultant to undertake classified turning count (CTC) traffic surveys on 20th March 2018 between 07.00 – 10.00hrs and 16.00 – 19.00hrs at the following junction locations, to facilitate the assessment detailed in the Scoping Note of 30th January, 2018: Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road; and Glossop Road / Orchard Drive / Cottage Lane. 5.3.2. These surveys are included at Appendix E, and comprise the 2018 Baseline scenario. 5.4 FUTURE YEARS AND COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT 5.4.1. As detailed in the Scoping Note the Future Year scenarios consider 2023 (application plus 5 years). 5.4.2. In order to growth 2018 survey flows to the future assessment year of 2023, the Nation Trip End Model (NTM), adjusted by TEMPro factors (version 7) has been used. The AM and PM growth factors extracted for High Peak for all-purpose car driver trips on principle roads in urban areas are: AM – 1.0698 PM – 1.0670 5.4.3. As also detailed in the Scoping Note, there are considered to be no consented developments within the vicinity of the proposals which should be recognised by this TA as committed above and beyond the TEMPro growth. No committed developments have been identified by HPBC Planning Development Control or DCC beyond the potential for a Gamesley Railway Station which is considered below. Potential Gamesley Railway Station 5.4.4. As identified within the Longdendale Integrated Transport Strategy and referenced in the approved TA associated with the 2011 planning application for the site, there is scope for a railway station at Gamesley, bordering the south of the site. It is considered that access to the site would be from Orchard Drive, notably Chapter 6 identifies the Orchard Drive / Glossop Road priority junction as being forecast to operate well within operational capacity in the scenarios considered. 5.4.5. The station, understood to be first planned in circa 1940 during electrification of the line, was subject to an economic appraisal in 2009 by GMPTE which concluded that there is a positive case for the opening of a station at Gamesley. It was announced in August 2013, however, that plans for a station are once again on hold. 5.4.6. The 2011 TA stated that vehicular traffic flows generated by such a station would be low based on the existing parking provision at nearby Dinting Station, the surrounding population and the proposed location not serving a mainline railway. The TA concluded that development of the site does not preclude access to, or the delivery of, a new railway station as acces can be achieved via Orchard Drive.
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 16 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
5.5 VEHICLE TRIP RATES AND TRAFFIC GENERATION 5.5.1. As detailed in the LHA Scoping Note the anticipated vehicle trip rates for the proposed development have been extracted using the TRICS database (v.7.4.4). 5.5.2. To provide a comparable selection to the development site, sites have been selected from 03 – Residential category, and the sub-category A – Residential / Houses (Privately Owned). Sites located in Greater London, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland and Scotland have been excluded. 5.5.3. A total of five weekday surveys have been selected from sites in the Suburban Area, Edge of Town, and Neighbourhood Centre categories. 5.5.4. The average AM and PM peak vehicle trip rates have been extracted as outlined in Table 5. The full outputs are included at Appendix D.2. Table 5 - Vehicle Trip Rates
AM Peak (08.00 – 09.00) PM Peak (17.00 – 18.00)
Arrive Depart 2-way Arrive Depart 2-way Vehicle Trip Rate (per 0.133 0.304 0.437 0.286 0.164 0.45 Dwelling)
5.5.5. The vehicle trip rates of Table 5 have been applied to the proposed number of dwellings in order to estimate the total development vehicle generation during the AM and PM peak hour periods. A summary of the total vehicle generation derived is provided in Table 6. Table 6 - Vehicle Trip Generation (Proposed Development)
AM Peak (08.00 – 09.00) PM Peak (17.00 – 18.00)
Arrive Depart 2-way Arrive Depart 2-way Vehicle Trip Generation 21 47 68 44 25 70 5.6 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT 5.6.1. The vehicle trips generated by the proposed development have been distributed onto the local highway network using 2011 Census (Journey to Work) data, with the place of work of usual residents local to the site interrogated. 5.6.2. The Journey to Work Origin-Destination car driver data for the resident population of the local Lower Super Output Areas (LSOA) of High Peak 002A and 002B have been used to determine the likely destination of trips in the peak hours. The development site is situated on the border with these LSOAs, which comprise the main residential area of Gamesley, so it is considered the 2011 Census travel characteristics will be comparable to those of the proposed development. A total of two routes have been defined as below: A – Glossop Road (West); and B – Glossop Road (East). 5.6.3. Route planning software has been used in determining the anticipated routes taken between the development site and the various work destinations. 5.6.4. Primarily, routes have been distributed based on the journey time estimated by the route planning software. Where multiple routes are anticipated to offer comparable journey times, weighting has been applied to the route with the shorter length as considered appropriate. Where multiple routes are anticipated to offer comparable journey times and distances, trips have been distributed equally between the route options. 5.6.5. Based on the above methodology, the resultant proportion of the Journey to Work destinations from the development site is determined to be as identified in Table 7.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 17 of 24
Table 7 - Trip Distribution Matrix
Journey to Work Destination (Route)
West (A) East (B) Total Arrive (AM) 7.8% 92.2% 100% Depart (AM) 5.8% 94.2% 100% Arrive (PM) 5.8% 94.2% 100% Depart (PM) 11.6% 88.4% 100%
5.6.6. Assuming the trip generation of Table 7 this equates to the trips on each defined route identified by Table 8. Table 8 - 2-way Route Assignment (Proposed Development)
Journey to Work Destination (Route)
West (A) East (B) Total Arrive (AM) 2 19 21 Depart (AM) 3 44 47 Arrive (PM) 3 42 45 Depart (PM) 3 22 25
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 18 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
6 JUNCTION ASSESSMENT
6.1.1. This chapter provides a summary of the junction capacity analyses undertaken in consideration of the AM and PM peak periods of the traffic flow scenarios identified in Chapter 5. It also provides details of visibility assessments undertaken. 6.2 STUDY AREA 6.2.1. It has been agreed with the LHA that the following junctions be assessed in capacity terms: Proposed Site Access (Glossop Road); Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road; and Glossop Road / Orchard Drive; and Glossop Road / Cottage Lane. 6.2.2. The Glossop Road junctions with Orchard Drive and Glossop Road have been modelled independently based on their distance apart (approximately 40m), on-site observations and the CTC data. 6.2.3. Visibility assessments have been undertaken at the proposed site access junction, as detailed in Chapter 4. 6.3 CAPACITY PARAMETERS AND MODELLING SOFTWARE 6.3.1. The assessment of the priority junctions has been undertaken using the Junctions 9 computer programme, the industry standard traffic modelling computer software package used for assessing junctions of this kind. 6.3.2. A Ratio of Flow to Capacity (RFC) value of 0.85 or less typically demonstrates that a junction arm or turning movement is operating ‘within capacity’ and is therefore unlikely to experience regular queuing. Queues are measured in Passenger Car Units (PCUs) and delay in seconds. 6.3.3. Geometry parameters have been measured from detailed OS mapping, while configurations. 6.3.4. The junctions have been assessed in terms of capacity on a ‘nil-detriment’ basis i.e. the highway conditions with the proposed development in place should be no worse than without the proposed development, or should work within the acceptable capacity threshold. 6.4 PROPOSED SITE ACCESS (GLOSSOP ROAD) 6.4.1. As detailed in Chapter 4 the proposed site access on Glossop Road is proposed to take the form of a simple priority junction. The major arm of Glossop Road runs generally east – west with one lane in each direction and a right turn ghost-island, and the minor arm of the site access is proposed to run south into the site. 6.4.2. The layout has been modelled in the Future Year scenario using Junctions 9. A summary of the performance is provided in Table 9, with the full result outputs included at Appendix F.1. Table 9 – Proposed Site Access (Glossop Road)
AM Peak PM Peak Arm / Movement Queue Queue RFC Delay (s) RFC Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU) Future Year with Development (2023) Site Access (left) 0.01 0.0 6.18 0.01 0.0 6.11 Site Access (right) 0.14 0.2 12.35 0.08 0.1 12.22 Glossop Road (w’bound) 0.00 0.0 5.84 0.01 0.0 5.95
6.4.3. The proposed junction is forecast to operate well within capacity with a maximum RFC of 0.14 in the AM and 0.08 in the PM, and can therefore suitably accommodate the development proposals.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 19 of 24
6.5 GLOSSOP ROAD / MELANDRA CASTLE ROAD 6.5.1. The Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road junction takes the form of a simple priority junction. The major arm of Glossop Road runs generally east – west with one lane in each direction, and the minor arm of Melandra Castle Road to the north. 6.5.2. The total movements at this junction in the Future Year Baseline is forecast to be 995 passenger car units (PCUs) in the AM and 1015 in the PM. The Future Year With Development scenario is forecast to have a total of 1059 PCUs in the AM and 1079 PCUs in the PM, an increase of approximately 6% for both scenarios, the equivalent of one PCU every 60-90 seconds. A summary of the performance is provided in Table 10, with the full result outputs included at Appendix F.2. Table 10 – Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road
AM Peak PM Peak Arm / Movement Queue Queue RFC Delay (s) RFC Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU) 2018 Baseline Melandra Castle Road (left) 0.21 0.3 7.80 0.05 0.1 7.39 Melandra Castle Road (right) 0.17 0.2 12.24 0.23 0.3 12.11 Glossop Road (w’bound) 0.09 0.1 6.34 0.10 0.1 6.65 Future Year Baseline (2023) Melandra Castle Road (left) 0.23 0.3 8.11 0.06 0.1 7.60 Melandra Castle Road (right) 0.19 0.2 12.92 0.25 0.3 12.93 Glossop Road (w’bound) 0.10 0.1 6.38 0.11 0.1 6.75 Future Year with Development (2023) Melandra Castle Road (left) 0.24 0.3 8.37 0.06 0.1 7.72 Melandra Castle Road (right) 0.19 0.2 13.59 0.26 0.3 13.54 Glossop Road (w’bound) 0.10 0.1 6.49 0.11 0.4 6.76
6.5.3. The junction is forecast to operate well within capacity with a maximum RFC of 0.24 in the AM and 0.26 in the PM of the Future Year With Development scenario. It is therefore considered that junction mitigation is not required as a result of the proposed development. 6.6 GLOSSOP ROAD / ORCHARD DRIVE 6.6.1. The Glossop Road / Orchard Drive junction takes the form of a simple priority junction. The major arm of Glossop Road runs generally east – west with one lane in each direction, and the minor arm of Orchard Drive to the south. 6.6.2. To the north of the junction is a minor, one-way link to Cottage Lane used primarily for on-street parking adjacent to approximately 10 Cottage Lane properties. Based on on-site observations and the CTC data this link is immaterial to the operation of the junction so has been excluded from the model. 6.6.3. The total movements at this junction in the Future Year Baseline is forecast to be 942 PCUs in the AM and 943 in the PM. The Future Year With Development scenario is forecast to have a total of 1005 PCUs in the AM and 1007 PCUs in the PM, an increase of 7%for both scenarios, the equivalent of one PCU every 60-90 seconds. A summary of the performance is provided in Table 11, with the full result outputs included at Appendix F.3.
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 20 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
Table 11 - Glossop Road / Orchard Drive
AM Peak PM Peak Arm / Movement Queue Queue RFC Delay (s) RFC Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU) 2018 Baseline Orchard Drive (left) 0.01 0.0 5.96 0.00 0.0 5.82 Orchard Drive (right) 0.04 0.0 11.05 0.02 0.0 10.89 A626 Glossop Road (e’bound) 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.01 0.0 6.29 Future Year Baseline (2023) Orchard Drive (left) 0.01 0.0 6.07 0.00 0.0 5.91 Orchard Drive (right) 0.04 0.0 11.51 0.02 0.0 11.28 A626 Glossop Road (e’bound) 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.01 0.0 6.38 Future Year with Development (2023) Orchard Drive (left) 0.01 0.0 6.13 0.00 0.0 6.03 Orchard Drive (right) 0.04 0.0 11.96 0.02 0.0 11.79 A626 Glossop Road (e’bound) 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.01 0.0 6.51
6.6.4. The junction is forecast to operate well within capacity with a maximum RFC of 0.04 in the AM and 0.02 in the PM of the Future Year With Development scenario. It is therefore considered that junction mitigation is not required as a result of the proposed development. 6.7 GLOSSOP ROAD / COTTAGE LANE 6.7.1. The Glossop Road / Cottage Lane junction takes the form of a simple priority junction. The major arm of Glossop Road runs generally east – west with one lane in each direction and a short, narrow right turn ghost- island, and the minor arm of Cottage Lane to the north. 6.7.2. The total movements at this junction in the Future Year Baseline is forecast to be 1,191 PCUs in the AM and 1,167 in the PM. The Future Year With Development scenario is forecast to have a total of 1,254 PCUs in the AM and 1,231 PCUs in the PM, an increase of approximately 5% for both scenarios, the equivalent of one PCU every 60-90 seconds. A summary of the performance is provided in Table 12, with the full result outputs included at Appendix F.4.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 21 of 24
Table 12 –Glossop Road / Cottage Lane
AM Peak PM Peak Arm / Movement Queue Queue RFC Delay (s) RFC Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU) 2018 Baseline Cottage Lane (left) 0.22 0.3 8.29 0.20 0.3 8.10 Cottage Lane (right) 0.12 0.1 12.02 0.06 0.1 11.23 A626 Glossop Road (w’bound) 0.24 0.3 7.90 0.21 0.3 7.73 Future Year Baseline (2023) Cottage Lane (left) 0.24 0.3 8.67 0.22 0.3 8.41 Cottage Lane (right) 0.13 0.2 12.87 0.07 0.1 11.87 A626 Glossop Road (w’bound) 0.26 0.3 8.23 0.23 0.3 8.03 Future Year with Development (2023) Cottage Lane (left) 0.24 0.3 8.94 0.22 0.3 8.54 Cottage Lane (right) 0.14 0.2 13.60 0.07 0.1 12.39 A626 Glossop Road (w’bound) 0.26 0.4 8.47 0.23 0.3 8.14
6.7.3. The junction is forecast to operate well within capacity with a maximum RFC of 0.26 in the AM and 0.23 in the PM of the Future Year With Development scenario. It is therefore considered that junction mitigation is not required as a result of the proposed development. 6.8 SUMMARY 6.8.1. The proposed site access junction has been modelled to suitably accommodate the development proposals. The following junctions have been assessed in capacity terms, and are considered to be immaterially impacted as a result of the proposed development: Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road; Glossop Road / Orchard Drive; and Glossop Road / Cottage Lane.
WSP GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY April 2018 Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA Page 22 of 24 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd
7 SUMMARY
7.1.1. WSP has been appointed by Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd to provide highways and transportation planning support with respect to their full application for residential development at the land south of Glossop Road, Gamesley (High Peak, Derbyshire). To support the application WSP have produced a Transport Assessment (TA) and a Framework Travel Plan (FTP). 7.1.2. The site is located approximately 20km east of Manchester City Centre. It is bounded by residential developments to the north, wooded areas to the east, and a railway line to the south and west. Running along the northern boundary of the site is the A626 Glossop Road, which provides the main access to the site. 7.1.3. The land South of Glossop Road currently consists of open fields and farm land, with a vacant warehouse formerly occupied by Samas Roneo until 2002. Access to the site is currently It is proposed that the plot be developed to comprise approximately 155 dwellings comprising of access provided via a priority junction with Glossop Road, inclusive of a right-turn ghost island and associated pedestrian refuge to the east. 7.1.4. Throughout this Transport Assessment and supporting Framework Travel Plan (FTP) it is demonstrated that the proposed development: Is within local, regional and national policy in-keeping with transport guidance; Is sustainable and accessible in transport terms regarding walking and cycling links to the local area; and Has an immaterial impact on the surrounding highway network.
GLOSSOP ROAD, GAMESLEY WSP Project No.: 70043297 | Our Ref No.: 70043297-TA April 2018 Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd Page 23 of 24
The Victoria Job Title Glossop Road, Gamesley 150-182 The Quays Salford Project Number 70043297 Manchester M50 3SP Date 30 January 2018 Subject Transport Assessment – Scoping Note Tel: +44 (0)161 886 2563 www.wspgroup.com Client Pendragon Estates Developments Ltd www.pbworld.com
INTRODUCTION
WSP has been appointed by Pendragon Estate Developments Ltd to provide highways and transportation planning support with respect to their application for residential development at Glossop Road, Gamesley (High Peak, Derbyshire). To support the application WSP will produce a Transport Assessment (TA) and a Framework Travel Plan (FTP). As shown by Figure 1 the site is located to the south of Glossop Road, adjacent to the Hadfield – Glossop railway line. It currently comprises open field and agricultural land, and industrial units comprising the former Samas Roneo warehouse vacated in 2002. It is proposed that the plot be developed to comprise approximately 150 dwellings. Access to the industrial units is currently provided via a priority crossroads with Glossop Road and Melandra Castle Road. It is proposed that vehicular access to the development be provided via a priority junction with Glossop Road, approximately 75m west of Melandra Castle Road. The purpose of this short note is to provide officers at the local highway authority, Derbyshire County Council (DCC) with the intended structure of the TA, and as such the approach that will be adopted in the highways and transportation assessment with respect to the proposals. The FTP will be developed in further liaison with Derbyshire County Council and local planning authority, High Peak Borough Council (HPBC) officials. WSP agreed a scope of assessment with DCC in preparation of a TA in support of residential development at Glossop Road, Gamesley in 2011. As such, and following discussion with DCC Highways Development Control, it is considered that a similar scope of assessment be appropriate. This scoping note has been prepared on this basis.
TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT – SCOPE
Chapter 1 – Introduction Chapter 1 will introduce the proposals and associated highways and transportation assessments undertaken.
Chapter 2 – Policy Chapter 2 will provide an overview of local and national transport policy to provide context for the development proposals’ assessment. This will include DCC’s Infrastructure Plan (2013) and Local Transport Plan (2011), and HPBC’s Local Plan (2016), Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) and design guidance.
Chapter 3 – Site Location and Accessibility Chapter 3 will set out the existing situation at the development site with respect to location, the local sustainable travel opportunities and the local highway network, including: · a description of the existing usage of the site; · a review of the sustainable travel links and amenities in proximity to the site; and · a description of the adjacent local highway network and analysis of personal injury accident data for the study area referred to in ‘Chapter 5’ of this note.
Chapter 4 – Development Proposals Chapter 4 will detail the development proposals including a breakdown of the land use quantum, vehicular and sustainable accessibility and parking. It will also provide a summary of the supporting FTP. As stated, it is proposed that vehicular access to the development be provided via a priority junction with Glossop Road, approximately 75m west of Melandra Castle Road. Notably this is in line with comments made by DCC in 2011, with the access comprising a staggered junction as opposed to maintaining the existing crossroads arrangement. WSP will prepare a preliminary design of the proposed arrangement for discussion with DCC, and subsequent inclusion in the TA.
Chapter 5 – Trip Generation and Highway Network Assessment Chapter 5 will provide an assessment of the trip generation, distribution and assignment associated with the site and a local highway network assessment. The proposed methodology is outlined below. Trip Rates and Traffic Generation Anticipated Vehicle trip rates for the proposed development have been extracted using the TRICS database (v7.4.4). To provide a comparable selection to the development site, sites have been selected from 03 – Residential category and the sub-category A – Residential / Houses (Privately Owned). Sites located in Greater London, the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, and Scotland have been excluded. A total of five weekday surveys have been selected from sites in the Suburban Area, Edge of Town, and Neighbourhood Centre categories. The average AM and PM peak vehicle trip rates have been extracted as outlined in Table 1. Table 1 – Vehicle Trip Rates
AM PEAK (08.00 – 09.00) PM PEAK (17.00 – 18.00) Arrive Depart 2 way Arrive Depart 2 way Vehicle Trip Rate (per Dwelling) 0.133 0.304 0.437 0.286 0.164 0.450
The vehicle trip rates of Table 1 will be applied to the proposed number of dwellings in order to estimate the total development vehicle generation during the peak hour periods of 08.00 – 09.00 and 17.00 – 18.00.
Other Mode Trips
The most up to date (2011) Census data will be interrogated for the High Peak ward of Gamesley to determine the development trip generation for other modes of travel, based on the vehicle trip generation estimation.
Gamesley ward will be used as it comprises the residential areas in proximity to the site. It is considered that residents at the proposed development are likely to exhibit similar travel characteristics as those currently residing in the area.
The multi-modal trip generation derived will be used for the setting of initial targets in the FTP. Trip Distribution and Assignment The vehicle trips generated by the proposed development will be distributed onto the local highway network using 2011 Census data, with the place of work of usual residents local to the site interrogated. Junction Study Area It is proposed that the following junctions will comprise the study area for the TA for capacity and personal injury accident data analyses: · Site Access / Glossop Road; · Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road; · Glossop road / Orchard Drive; and · Glossop Road / Cottage Lane. Detailed junction capacity analyses will be undertaken using Junctions 9 software. Future Years / Traffic Growth and Committed Development Within the TA, the junction study area defined above will be assessed in capacity terms for the AM and PM peak periods of the base year of 2018 and future assessment year of 2023 (application plus 5 years). The future year’s assessment will be undertaken for with and without proposed development scenarios. In order to growth 2018 survey flows to the future assessment year of 2023, the Nation Trip End Model (NTM), adjusted by TEMPro factors (version 7) will be used. The AM and PM growth factors extracted for High Peak for all-purpose car driver trips on principle roads in urban areas are: · AM – 1.0698 · PM – 1.0670 It is considered that there are no consented developments within the vicinity of the proposals which should be recognised in the TA as committed above and beyond the TEMPro growth. Discussions have been opened with HPBC Planning Development Control in this regard, as advised by DCC.
Chapter 6 – Summary Chapter 6 will summarise the report. 5 5 :
9 Key 0
8
1 Indicative Site Boundary 0 2 / 1
0 Indicative Vehicular Access / 0 3
: d e i f i d o M e t a D 2 0 0 S J D K U
: y B n w a r D m e t s y S g n i p p a M e n i l n O s ' TITLE: P S W
, S I Glossop Road, Gamesley G i g n i s u
FIGURE No: d e
t Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, a Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, e
r 0 50 100 150 200 METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Figure 1 C
Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia, NGCC, © : m e OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS l i User Community F Skinner, Daniel
From: Geoff Blissett (Economy Transport and Environment)
Paul / Nick.
Thank you for sight of the Transportation Assessment Scoping Note.
Although the Scoping Note discusses committed development and as Local Planning Authority High Peak Borough Council are best placed to provide advice about this, however, and although perhaps in the strictest sense not ‘committed’, Derbyshire’s Local Transport Plan (LTP) 2011 – 2026 does support provision for a new railway station for Gamesley as a scheme with’ potential for appraisal as County Council - sponsored scheme’.
I have in the past provided the development control service with advice about this and can recall previous proposals making provision access a station at Gamesley also agreed was an allowance for likely attraction / generation of car borne traffic to the station. The Scoping Note makes mention of a Station at Gamesley, an omission that the transportation assessment will need to address in due course.
The Scoping Note makes no reference to accidents either. Accident data can be provided by Derbyshire Constabulary. Contact Alison Morse 0300 122 8743 or 122 5043.
As you are aware also, the County Council assisted High Peak Borough Council with the preparation of their Local Plan, principally in the form of a Transport Study. The Study identified the cumulative transport impact of development proposals in the Local Plan area and recommended an appropriate mitigation strategy taking into account likely deliverability of identified measures and sources of funding. The Transport Study included consideration of the A626 Glossop Road / Melandra Castle Road noting that it is a three-arm priority junction, which has give-way road markings and signing to indicate that trips on the A626 have priority over the other turning movements. The A626 Glossop Road is orientated east-west and Melandra Castle Road is located to the north of the A626. I understand that there is a considerable area of highway verge that would not constrain a significant improvement to this junction, or introduction of traffic signal control were it to be required. An initial indicative cost of introducing traffic signal control would include provision of controller, cutting of induction loops in the carriageway, a modest amount of engineering to provide revision to the kerb line, carriageway with localised widening, would be estimated to be £200,000, although the cost estimate does not include provision for any statutory undertaker’s apparatus.
Whilst I don’t think that there would be an immediate problem at the junction however, and based upon the analysis in the Transport Study, clearly though cumulative effects of both traffic from this site and other sites identified in the now Adopted Local Plan indicate a potential future problem at the junction. As the Transport Study has identified a potential solution, I feel that it is only reasonable that the developer be approached to make a contribution towards improvements to the junction.
I trust that you find these observations helpful, please feel free to discuss.
Regards,
Geoff Blissett
Development Control, Transportation Assessment & Studies Officer
1 01629 538646
(Int 38646)
Economy, Transport and Environment, Derbyshire County Council County Hall, Matlock, Derbyshire, DE4 3AG.
Highway Development Advice is offered in good faith, but is an informal opinion only, given on a without prejudice basis and does not commit the County Council, (Highway Authority) to any action, recommendation, or decision. Advice may be subject to further review at a later date.
From: Nick Knowles (Economy Transport and Environment) Sent: 31 January 2018 11:48 To: Geoff Blissett (Economy Transport and Environment)
Morning Geoff Please find attached the Scoping Note for the Samas Roneo site in Gamesley. It’s a site that Paul F has been looking at recently – I wouldn’t be surprised if there wasn’t an existing TA for previous submissions. Notwithstanding, your views on the proposed TA preparation will be appreciated. Please forward to Paul who should be able to provide you with any further detail if required. Regards Nick
From: Purrier, Alex [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 30 January 2018 12:14 To: Nick Knowles (Economy Transport and Environment)
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your time on the phone last week when we briefly discussed proposals for residential development at Glossop Road, Gamesley.
To support an application for approximately 150 dwellings we will be producing a Transport Assessment and Framework Travel Plan; please find our TA scoping note attached which provides a summary of the proposals and identifies the intended structure of the report, and as such the approach that we intend to adopt in the assessment.
While details of the proposals are somewhat still developing, we would appreciate Derbyshire County Council Highways Development Control comments on the scope of our assessment at this stage so we can agree an approach and proceed with our assessment. We would also be keen to meet to discuss, if you feel appropriate having reviewed the attached.
As discussed and included in the scope, it is considered that there are no consented developments within the vicinity of the proposals which should be recognised in the TA as committed above and beyond the TEMPro growth. This will be confirmed through discussion with High Peak Borough Council Planning Officers, as you suggested.
We look forward to hearing from you, please don’t hesitate to contact me if you require any further information or would like to discuss.
Alex Purrier
2 Senior Engineer
T +44 (0)161 886 2563 wsp.com
From: Purrier, Alex Sent: 26 January 2018 12:17 To: '[email protected]' Subject: Glossop Road, Gamesley
Hi Ben,
I’ve just left you a voicemail, I was hoping to discuss the above development proposals on the Samas Roneo site.
I’ve discussed the scope of our Transport Assessment with Nick Knowles at Derbyshire, he has suggested I speak to the Planners regards committed developments for consideration. Our client (Pat at Pendragon) has advised you are involved.
Please can you call me back to discuss? We will be submitting a Transport Assessment scoping note to Derbyshire for their comment and approval, this will make reference to committed developments.
Thanks in advance,
Alex Purrier Senior Engineer
T +44 (0)161 886 2563 wsp.com
This email or email thread section has been classified CONTROLLED - This email requires controlled access by Council personnel and / or intended recipient(s) only. This email may contain business or personal information.
This email or email thread section has been classified CONTROLLED - This email requires controlled access by Council personnel and / or intended recipient(s) only. This email may contain business or personal information.
3
Ú Preston & Blackpool Ú Blackburn & Clitheroe Hebden Bridge, Bradford & Leeds Ú Cumbria & Scotland Walsden Entwistle Greater Manchester ticketing boundary
Euxton Chorley Littleborough Balshaw Lane Bromley Cross Rochdale Smithy Bridge Adlington Town Centre
Hall i'th' Wood Newbold Milnrow
Parbold Horwich Ú Blackrod Parkway Bury Rochdale Rochdale Kingsway Appley Bridge Railway Business Newhey Station Park Radcliffe Gathurst Lostock Bolton Castleton Farnworth Shaw and Wigan Crompton
Southport Whitefield Wallgate Moses Ú Westhoughton Gate Besses o'th Barn Pemberton Ince Kearsley Derker & Leeds Prestwich Huddersfield Upholland Wigan Hindley Daisy Hag Fold Marsden
Mills Hill Ú Orrell North Hill Heaton Park Oldham Western Atherton Clifton King Street Bowker Vale Westwood Oldham Mumps Greater Manchester Oldham Kirkby ticketing boundary Moorside Crumpsall Moston South Central Freehold Walkden Swinton Abraham Moss Chadderton Greenfield Central Hollinwood Queens Road Park Mossley Bryn Salford Monsall Newton Heath Failsworth Manchester and Moston Ashton- Crescent Victoria under-Lyne Garswood Stalybridge Salford Ashton Central Shudehill Moss Ashton West Clayton Cemetery Patricroft Eccles Market Street Velopark Hall Road Audenshaw Langworthy Edge Droylsden Eccles Ladywell Weaste Piccadilly Holt Lane Broadway Gardens Town Etihad St Peter's Square Campus St. Helens Central Harbour City New MediaCityUK Islington Deansgate- Guide
Anchorage Castlefield Manchester Hadfield Ú Liverpool Oxford Road Ardwick Ashburys Fairfield Bridge Flowery Hattersley Dinting Salford Quays Cornbrook Deansgate Gorton Field Manchester Hyde Exchange Quay Piccadilly Belle Vue North Godley
Newton-le- Pomona Newton Broadbottom Ú Reddish Willows Chassen Road Urmston Trafford Park Ryder Brow for Hyde Glossop
Liverpool North © Transport for Greater Manchester 2014 14-1510-143043 Humphrey Earlestown Trafford Bar Hyde Central Park Levenshulme Brinnington Flixton Mauldeth Old Trafford Firswood Road Woodley Irlam Stretford Chorlton Burnage Heaton Dane Road St Werburgh's Road Bredbury Glazebrook Chapel Didsbury Sale Withington Village Sale East Didsbury Brooklands Water Stockport Romiley Barlow Burton West Birchwood Wythenshawe Park Road Didsbury East Timperley Park Moor Road Didsbury Moor Road Northern Moor Padgate Davenport Marple
Ú Liverpool Navigation Baguley Woodsmoor Rose Hill Altrincham Gatley Warrington Road Central Warrington Roundthorn Benchill Crossacres Cheadle Hulme Hazel Grove Strines Bank Quay Martinscroft Hale Wythenshawe Middlewood Town Centre Robinswood Road Bramhall Disley Greater Manchester Rail Tickets Area Peel New Mills Hall Heald Green Central Ashley Train Shadowmoss Poynton New Mills Newtown Traincards can Styal Handforth be used at these Metrolink City Zone Manchester stations Mobberley Airport Greater Manchester Metrolink ticketing boundary Furness Vale Chinley Knutsford Wilmslow Sheffield Macclesfield, Adlington Whaley Bridge
Ú Ú Ú Ú Ú Ú Ú Crewe & Crewe, Shrewsbury Crewe, Stoke-on-Trent Chester & North Wales London Euston Northwich & Chester & South Wales & London Euston & London Euston Buxton Ú ST. To Tintwistle To Tintwistle PETER 237 E P D A I 393 DF Bus served roads...... S FT IE R O y R LD E C a Hail and Ride section of route ...... 390* 237 T D 1 1 SSV M 0 /4 /2 A Mile w A RO AL A le 393 B E IN 393 O W Bus routes hourly or better* ...... H . 351 R 236 Glossop O R U d SE D 237 i il R r B ra O T S A Bus routes951 4-5D journeys0 a day or better*....400 394800 Metres ET e e TA D E n T A R in ni IO E T en N H n T S P . Infrequent bus service ...... 202 D n E s HADFIELD T e O n 237 393 M P a S T r AD R O HOLLINGWORTH E T RO 393 393 T P K S Certain journeysW only ...... O P L R L O A E A E A T P PADFIELD
T
M G D
E S ID 393 ST 392 ‘Gun Inn’ R N R T Route terminus ......
A E . B CHA L E PEL OAD T R
393 Routes operate in direction of arrow ......
D P A W Y HADFIE L R Hadfield
To Mottram LE LD IE K O L H F
OO R R Bus stop...... R O I O D
and Manchester O L W G A A O MO L D H A E H M Y R E D RA E Rail line and station ...... OTT LANE ‘Pear Tree O N M 236 A R 393 A E L 236 Inn’ D B 237 W A N *Weekday daytime frequency 237 RN A O L W CE O M Spread A E L ‘Chieftain’ H T N S E Eagle L E RY To Woodhead E E W Y E R N NE R G LA O
Glossopdale W A B A N D H D R S O College A I R
D O 236 T
H G Lower School R
E
390
Henry Street 351
R
H Shire Hill O
B A D
commencing: I R L D
O H A T Hospital
L E 390* EE O 393 * E T A R
K LA 61,351 T T T N H F N O H S I W E E E
C R P
Melandra Castle E A D T
L also calling: S O U D H 237 E B
A O 390*
S R D
O
C ET
A C 390,393 TRE R K S
D A D W E N R OP
A S I H
N A L T E P L T . M E ING ST
E 390*
R H
393 D T C N O A A R REET O LB U Y ST A H LE A R O EP
C SH L DINTING .
D T
341 A R L
R D
O S G OA D A Howard Arms 394 A E Dinting E N Glossopdale 392 D H I O G D S T R OLD I A N 351 calling:
A N I T College K M D T T D E
I A 390 390 R E T N O GLOSSOP
. Upper School R E A 236,237,393 L G 393 P O R
GAMESLEY A A L L T R C 393 E N 394 V G V S O A U D N 394 D N L I A ‘Royal R A F O E T A Q A R U K E Plough N M 2 I EN Oak’ 3 Glossop L GLOSSOP 393 D S 3 6 (see above right) 4 , O D C P Inn 2 F RIV E A O 1 3 1 1 S ,3 Henry Street R (see right) 0 /4 /2 Mile ST AD S 9 7 LE RO LO 4 O ST SH G N A EFFIE ‘Howard E LD ROAD Arms’ ET HIG RE To 0 400 800 Metres H STREET WEST ST HIGH 236,237 Snake 2 . 3 T 37 E 6 2 Pass ,23 Market S 236, 393 236,237 N 7 3 93 A 41 ,3 236* 341 L BO , 390 236*,237* Hall A S W 39 I Y 4 LA H E N (see below left) R 237* 393*
ET Trans Pennine Trail L D O I R
K P D R E M A e T B N 393* R n C OOK DRIVE S n O I i . n M RO V P T T e EN AD 236* 237* To REET M N S I I B N S E E R 61 E HIGH
r OAD FIE V W Broadbottom i U L I D d N D R
E O P A l R 390 C e T O D 341 R L A 390 O w H S A N S D R N D R D D a A O E A y A AD 393* T R H L E R O T D G U L A G 390 R E O A L W N R S O S HI
Market Hall L TF E L R
341 P T I E N E EL F E
O O I SHIREBROOK 341 D F H G SIMMONDLEY E I C A T S commencing: W V L E S E C A
. S H PARK 394 N O L 341,394 390 T A L HIGH LANE R E R N G O
calling: A E D 393* R WHITFIELD D
O 61 R 236,237 IV A E
393 to Padfield D 393 © Copyright Derbyshire County Council CHARLESWORTH 394 To Marple To Hayfield Produced by 12.10.17
A61 To Berwick- Shepley To Leeds upon-Tweed A62 A628 A671 A6052 WEST A635 Pennine Bridleway National Trail Holmfirth Denby Dale Cudworth to Cumbria. A663 YORKSHIRE A616 A627(M) A635 A629 A670 A672 Barnsley A6024 A62 Holme B6106 Oldham A628 A635 Silkstone Uppermill A635 Tour de France Grasscroft Stage 2 Victoria Dodworth A669 A633 Silkstone ns Pe Common Tra nn ine
Crow Trail S GREATER Millhouse H A62 Greenfield Edge M1 Wombwell E A628 To Hull and York I F l Green N i A627 F F
MANCHESTER I I a R Hazelhead E D r M Penistone L A T Chesterfield D A Worsbrough O R e R Y R Dunford n O R A61 i A D A6024 N Bridge . n .
D A O M60 Mossley E n T Oxspring A6195 A633 V 6 e A
1 G P N A628 Thurgoland A6023 I B6175 s NE N A M n L Langsett A6135 O W I S E Ashton- E RY R a Y R S M18r W Midhopestones Hoyland H B D T B N U . O A629 R T R R under- Woodhead N A60 O A Langsett E A1(M) L N C A670 Crowden T T MAL Pennine SA Y KI Lyne l A616 LTE W R S N Tr i Reservoir RGA OA T. A635 Bridleway an a Mexborough TE E D r D s T L P Holmebrook Valley A ennine T E L Chesterfield D O L T Torside Underbank S L T Swinton A A R S S A A I LT T ER T S G G A Rail Station E T A616 O E R H E Reservoir Reservoir ALB E N E R IO Wentworth N L E R R E Town A O L W A Y E R T Stalybridge D Conisbrough E I
T Greenway S A t M D A662 Torside H S C A627 O L s N I A628 U Hall W O N E E
L e O D R R
E k S S r P Stocksbridge G O N N C R
l N A ON o O n TI ail 6 s Y
r A R E m E
T e O n i E
il N S e d . a E
Deepcar R
B e F m le L om d H L E c n T S
H Re T. R S w L n a T I L L NIFESMIT To P P d R K H E A635 E G A
a Tintwistle U AT T A6018 PA E C n A R k Museum R R S G C e SOUTH YORKSHIRE R L
Court H a O E Bleaklow C
e d i C
S U Guide v K L P g T R
Broomhead A633 e E EE
House STR S I S
Longdendale Trail R C n r IGH E H T
Bridge Chapeltown NEW ’
S E M67 o Reservoir H F L H MARKET E Y
Planned closures Pennine A630 SQUARE R P Crooked R o W R Tour de France W O Hollingworth ES M18 L AY l T PLACE E A W
Flowery Field LOW O Hyde in 2014-2015 check Way m BAR PAVEM G Spire
S A M Stage 2 EN A e T T
North Newton Mottram E b D website for details r M . Hadfield o A The Pavements VICAR T Godley More Hall o R LN. S A57 Melandra Castle k KH N M60 B6105 A D E W Shopping Centre L Reservoir M A B Sheffield & South EE O Hyde O Roman Fort TWELL STRE R E R T R Central Hyde Hattersley Yorkshire Navigation OA B TREET A629 EET L S D K WEL Ecclesfield DOCK D H Kings Tree R I S Y ALK P D Gamesley W A A H B M A57 P H A631I P LL E Heritage Oughtibridge O Hipper Valley R I Y Tickhill L Glossop R T S L Centre i H Greenway M T v Rotherham ARK . O HA w Broadbottom M A o Snake Pass e RO r R AD e r A6 6 To Liverpool Bradfield P Cyclists 19 h D Parsons River Hipper 1 t Charlesworth E o S E Derwent n DismountMaltby T r D Woodley Cross R e Reservoir A A631 over bridge E iv O R Queens E R U R A631 R Bredbury i T Chisworth Birchin Clough p v A6102 Middlewood O e A Park p r K Romiley A61 D e L o R
r x A l Meadowhall Compstall e P y
River Rother Snake Inn D 0 1/4 Mile A60 A1(M) e Derwent A614 A624 r m A631 Dams Malin ra w Hillsborough A6135 rt e 0 A634 400 Metres G A626 e p r oyt Hayfield Kinder A57 Derwent n Bridge u ve A627 S Ri Marple t S Countryside Fairholmes u A6102 Scout R L Va p iv a e Finish er d r y t Centre A b l r sh o l a op w e m A626 Goyt er y R Cutthroat Oldcotes Marple Kinder 1 Shalesmoor e A630 A6 Rosehill Way s 5 R Reservoir e Bridge i Marple r A630 v Pennine v m Sheffield e A627 Fearfall o A57 r Birch i Sheffield R Way r i Tr B6101 New l A57 an o e A57 s t Vale Hayfield La Wood h Hazel s d P e A618 Blyth B6045 Mills Edale yb Rivelin Dams e r Grove Tra ow es n ley il e il n al Ri r R m SOUTH V es v es Redmires i Aston A634 t il er ervoir n t 5 m N .5 M1 e 2. oe Stanage Edge Reservoirs 7 A625 e R YORKSHIRE A6 S A624 T k A6135 i ho to r T v d P a r e P S r l A621 Heritage Centre Edale e Heatherdene ak ail Win u P r e e n i p A57 Disley A6013 e n N 1 f h High r n Hill f t o . r i e a A1 5 i
Middlewood n e m e l Neb h A6102 Newtown l Ecclesall A61 m l S A57 Rother Poynton New Mills Torrs B B6045 r Hope T Gleadless Wales A60 Peak Forest Canal Treak Cliff i Herdings Valley & Millennium 4 id A6187 l r Bamford 8 Blue John Hope e a Park 3.5 miles l Rushup Cavern s i Ringinglow Country Walkway e l Kiveton Park l m w Edge Cavern Supertram a Furness i ay Park n Chinley l a Vale es Na Castleton Bamford C ( tio A625 3 mi A625 d Lyme Park i Peak l Killamarsh l A6 n n Peveril e Chesterfield Canal e a s Killamarsh i D
f and Country Park A6 A625 l Speedwell Cavern Hathersage e s A523 s Whaley r T Castle Halfway Greenway1 mile
e b Derwent e l Bugsworth Peak Forest Cavern
y r l c A6187 Longshaw Dore Bridge s a i c h i Valley A621 a CHESHIRE Basin Tramway 1 mile l Bagshawe Country Park Harthill i Heritage m Westthorpe M B6061 r Bradwell Bradway Chapel-en-le-Frith e Cavern Hathersage 1 Shireoaks ) Way 1 Worksop Limestone B6001 Coal Aston Kettleshulme B6056 Eckington l i
B5470 Way a
r A623 Totley T Chapel-en-le-Frith Peak Forest Dronfield Marsh A618 B6049 Renishaw Gritstone Lane A1 Way Grindleford Dronfield Dronfield Hall Renishaw A619 A57 B6054 B6057 e Bollington Woodhouse n Midshires Owler Bar i Barlborough Grindleford n A616 A523 B6419 Way Dove Holes B6051 n A60 Clumber Park B6052 e Bretton A625 P and Limestone Whitwell Fernilee FroggattEdge s B6521 A61 Barrow Hill A619 Welbeck Park B5470 Reservoir Eyam Revolution n Way A623 Round House a A616 Whitwell Curbar House r A6 B6034 T A614 Edge A621 terfield Clowne Rainow Commonside hes Canal Tideswell Stoney C Creswell Crags A5004 Blackwell Mill Middleton Creswell Errwood B6465 Heritage Centre Cycle Hire and Baslow Staveley Reservoir Poolsbrook B6418 Creswell Buxton Tuck Shop Edge A537 B6049 B6050 Cutthorpe B6051 Country
R Grin Low and Ravenstor Macclesfield i Brimington Park
v Buxton Museum B6417 e Buxton Holm Shuttlewood r Millers Dale A6001 e Tapton Lock A616 Country Park Buxton Topley Pike br le
G o d L Ri A623 Linacre o ri ink 6 miles o ver Wye St. Mary’s k B k y Pennine Cycleway Reservoirs V r
A536 t al o Crooked ley Poulter Cuckney Y Poole’s A6 Country Park Cavern Monsal Head Baslow Spire to M Chesterfield A632 y A54 Midshires onsal T Bolsover Langwith b r Hassop A619 A60 r a Chatsworth A619 S A515 il Chesterfield Peter Fidler e Station t Way o 9 Park Reserve Langwith D Macclesfield A6 Ashford-in- m c Bolsover
i Hipper k A632 l Carr 6 A616 Forest Pennine Cycleway the-Water e l Castle
A523 Chelmorton s Valley ey Chatsworth e Gritstone Way A617 Vale Church
Sparklow to Charlesworth, Edensor t
l A53 House u
Flash T Warsop a
Sustrans route identified o
n B6012 r a R a C for NCN68, not yet DCC Temple i
B6417
Old House Museum l k d r l assessed or approved. A632
Normanton 3 Market e o i t f Grassmoor . Shirebrook
s n 5 Bakewell w e e A61 Williamthorpe Ponds Warsop
l Ri Beeley t
c v w Wingerworth Country m e e r B6031 c r D Shirebrook a A54 o Haddon i
v Park n Sherwood Forest N e R e l De d M e i Pleasley Pit e v
Hall r Country Park e s s M l B5055 e e B6047
d r A6075 Chesterfield Way e E E A6 v r Country Park e c i o A NU l iv R E i y l V R R V D A o New EN i T Monyash o E SC T A T Sparklow ver Wye B5057 South C E i R t E O a S R Holmewood w m S R h A617 R GradbachR r E Bramley l C LL i e Houghton ane v e K E D K T O Lathkill Dale Rowsley a P H r 3 New N T r N L e i e e r m Vale n O v A y A515 m l n i B e p L R e s North Wingfield o o
l t o i L n G l o Caudwells A N T n o t R e H
i I E a m W a O n R E a Mill b L Hardwick LDE P V Longnor y Rowthorne
A A RS R e Meden Mills e G S N S r NOTTINGHAMSHIRE A T t T D T GE Hall E S t OR Youlgreave The Herb Trail il C e GE Trail H S R a Pleasley y S O r G AD F Garden c HALL STREET I Kelstedge A6175 T 1.5 miles H Clay Cross i l Parsley Hay v e L C O H e s Mansfield w y AD N U Hardstoft TeversalTrail O e LEA R S G R 6 Vicar Water H b HIG l T a L T C Ashover Clay Cross P Woodhouse Mansfield A H i y S g M N m i Country Park
L t 2.7 miles e Sherwood Pines D T
B5056 A Countryside m
High Lee A S s Woodhouse E N i k
R R Hidebank E l K Forest Park
T S ‘White 4 Y O H Centre e A R A6 B6036 r Rushton ’ Y s S D a D R A 5 Darley Bridge A632 Hart’ Teversal Mansfield O E 01 STAFFORDSHIRE Peak Rail il
M Spencer AD B A6 s HAGUE BA A A6075 ile R RO Meerbrook N Derwent Valley Teversal m
A K Hartington Station Stretton D D B5057 Silverhill Mansfield l 6 A R Friden Heritage Way Tibshelf i O U
R O Trail a N r N A Greenway IO Hartington B6014 Kings Mill T AT I D AD Matlock ST O ROUpper d New Mills Heritage N H Winster Tibshelf 3 miles Brierly Reservoir n RC Hulme Newhaven B6014 rla R U Morton Ponds be A617 Station Centre O CH Ogston Newton Forest Park Tim A H y Matlock D A615 Reservoir Higham B5054 A515 i a E g L A5012 im A6 U N h e B6026 A614 N w s Tansley I A t O P e L o Sutton-in- e Matlock A60 Tittesworth l Hulme
River Goyt Warslow M1 S R a n H
T c k e A53 iv T D R r
Reservoir S e a W A61 Ashfield A y r Bath E End
A523 O R i a E
R l y B6013 Blackwell T C ON A 1
I E Sutton B M d 7 Cromford Mill A611 L D e l Mininglow I Cromford A . S o D A5012 T n f 5 Wessington Parkway D o Start of the E i i v Blackwell O E n e A38 Rudyard O R n m T a Pennine Cromford W S Trail 1.5 miles n Glory Mine Kirkby Reservoir M i Alfreton B6139 e le Leek r Bridleway High Peak P s e Black
v Kirkby-in-
M i Junction Alfreton
R Rocks Cr South Peak Forest Canal5 a om Crich B6019 Ashfield 01 Newtown B5053 n T fo 6 i D r Tramway Normanton i s Middleton Top e d Pinxton A f B6020 Station s Alsop W rw r B6020 o i e C Village e Oakerthorpe n o b Bradnop l r n a d g l t n d m Newtown P M t V a e H l A a A o a Robin Hood k R T n National e B5035 A38 F S r ll r e o H i R r r a t y Line e T Stone Centre a iv Crich e L ra v B600 A s c i g e 6 t A523 A l Carsington M r i Leabrooks C k 1 e N Dovedale R a 3 Hopton i D A53 na E S ll A60 0 Wirksworth e 1/4 Mile l m B5056 i s Selston 8 t r e w A i 6 . l Bradbourne e B6016 7 e r Pentrich A520 Bottom House e n Tissington s 0 400 Metres 5 t r t a Millers e E t m Hall W c B6016 a Green c n i l A610 o l e
Tissington t W Midland e s A614 g Ambergate b Winkhill s Carsington A611 n
o Railway i
A s n u 1 mile R . Water r
Pennine D o r Centre a s Ironville N A6 F R t e n I C g E l e Heage Bridleway L D i Fenny il TintwistleIpstones n s D A a i Ripley M1 E r m R H T s e O l Glossop a D Bentley LA NE r 8 i Codnor l d O Waterhouses i Midshires A608 O A523 a l W w m C B600 Kniveton C A610 a a Way 2 n y B5053 e a A5009 l B5023 B6013 y l Brinsley 8 a B5035 A38 A6007 62 Bottoms d a A n A515 w Reservoir e E Riv n Marehay NOTTINGHAMSHIRE D GO e d Mapleton I D r C g A52 e S DA hu e Hucknall R R rnen Hulland r E D o t T L N ROAD A517 G A N L Hollingworth . AI Froghall A52 Ward y Denby W M D A517 le Heanor A Pottery T. D. LD Belper p S R P E O i Eastwood E A D FI Ashbourne R B6009 T DG A52 R BRI H D RKE Y B6179 LE e e A L M Hadfield Turnditch r r Adale Road O i w O D Toll Bar A t A60 a e . W W A 6 H . Mayfield Marlpool
B5417 n RD A B5024 g O E
0 M O DF D . A6 t 1 A IE R N Hadfield e A6002
8 TTR LLE LD L H A609
Y N. . V MO L W A522 C D Lower
A520 N W EM
L A Station E a Shipley Shipley
T O A610 a
7 N H ER l
5 S B5023 l Kilburn E Y O y A e
E W A521 A52 Country Nuthall E y R
R W G B6004 N D B5032 Osmaston Smalley Park N N . u A50 e t O A515 Awsworth ov A38 b R D r A6096 T o A6211 LongtonD Melandra H r o A Ellastone e v k O i
R Dinting Castle Cheadle R R Erewash D. O T
G A R A r R Station R Duffield 5 l D i Valley Trail E a O 7 o v L s D O e Trans Pennine Trail/ T s I A608 i S o N B5032 r A609 l 30 Miles M p A T E I C N D C L Pennine Cycleway G A hu A612
T B R O rnet Ilkeston
T Glossop Norbury
I A A521 r E L o M1 R . o
A5005 k Brailsford r D D B5033 Meir R Morley e
N Station
w
A P
w A6 1
o L Denstone Nottingham E O Little Eaton
er R
S a h Heritage 0 t M S E H H S i O IG T R s r L . v W h e G i e Kirk Hallam v Blyth Bridge . Centre v m i Kedleston Hall r e C R r A6002 i a D Breadsall l . A6514 6 P Glossop e n Trowell
T o Rodsley Allestree D 2 R s a IM S v
6 e e l A r R I A
w Great Northern A609
O R Rocester A612 e
. O A6096 n
L SEUpper TeanT Kirk Langley
D Greenway O t
Broadbottom C N R I Dale Abbey
A50 L V 3 miles Station G P A M O N i A52 S E d B5066 A52 L S HIGH LANE s A Longford B5020 A38 O h L 0 1/4 Mile A6011 A520 N B5030 i E G A52 r e
71 miles (in Derbyshire) s A6005 l Charlesworth 0 400 Metres a Pennine Cycleway Stapleford Hopewell to Wa n A52 y Sandiacre a A606 C Dale Abbey A60 A522 mi n 4.7 les o ay Greenway st w ee en Museums B t A52 re A52 n A52 Spath G B5010 Tre L r Spondon r IG e Derby Long e H v iv P T o Attenborough R W e Borrowash e Buxton A515 l Eaton n D O k River NCN68 Buxton yet A O A50 c A514 De Attenborough n O D i rw i R Doveridge Peartree en n to be DCC approved. Great M Mickleover A6 t Breaston Nature Reserve e R A606 R O C A A Northern A y B D Uttoxeter 5 c R Riv Stone 0 l O Greenway er D 0 ew C B5027 e B50274 ay Uttoxeter R A516 rw Draycott iv A511 en Trent Valley D A 6 e Elvaston Castle t Ruddington MAN Buxton A r A34 CHEST O D Alvaston Greenway A453 ER R o Sudbury & Country Park Long
Station v A50 Foston C e Eaton 3.8 Miles
D
A Sudbury Hall Etwall L
R ROAD R A38 Longhorse L O E
K A60 I
I R Shardlow S A A V
P F L Bridge
D TATIO I R E N D. S R C Greenway I T Hilton Trentlock Trent & MerseyA51 Canal Buxton A O B5017 Library DNS. F R 1.5 Miles R G G I T RIN A A50 Chellaston O P Town Centre E S R Midshires A R i v P D Hatton R e A A50 r r A R T l a A515 r Way
K e M1 C a
W nt n o River’s D E Tutbury & a OA RD Mer C S
R y . sey Canal y
G
S R Buxton e & Hatton e
’ B Pavilion B5013 Swarkestone s R Vale N D A5132 r B
H U e
A O .
A5132 r J A R Museum A518 Tutbury M N
Gardens e L D K K STAFFORDSHIRE Tutbury Way I B &
t v Midshires N L A
. t n i T A O E Y
S G Barrow-on- n e R R Midshires Way W W Castle R e r T Buxton R Willington i r T O N v Higher O e T r
E r N e D O Egginton Trent v to the Ridgeway T . Opera A Tr i
A L e R G T D nt A6 R 3 O N S Buxton L A511 D I in Buckinghamshire. 5 R T House A . ES B R R Stanton-by-Bridge Donington Park L . CC FIE A OA W A H E LD H L D R A D A514 Trent M C H R H S Repton R
G A Race Track and I O I R D E A I East
. T R l
O T RD A A H H 6 H D Viaduct D o T T A T A B L F Motor Museum Kegworth A34 L H U E R B5066 W I E u Midlands E D D S R F DUKE ST. T Derby A ROA L U S d D N P O S ST. A ARD K N R A W N 6 T ED K Airport E A O T C D R R A O M B5017 D RD. C O K K E S r M A R E T D a L NCE O I SPE N I A LLD M . O L N T R Melbourne i 6 A513 AL R E P A38 l E T D 1 A E G A51E O G A5121 1 V N . Isley G EN A518 L E N . A453 A6006 R UE P A R N 3 Wilson EE EM L D R VE L N T . GRO Abbots FO ST Horninglow m O ATH ET RE Foremark Walton LA HE RE S ST. X ET N R T ’S E P A S E N T i O E B5234 A l E BromleyG L R L Reservoir e N e D E A G D E K s
E D H T. R M Grin Low D I O
E n B5013 . S E U A42 R L T Long
R B S T i N v B5234 A5013 Poole’s G n 01 D’ and Buxton A6 . e S NO Ticknall i T A L S r TTINGHAM R Breedon Whatton S Stafford n A PE Industrial W OAD o Country Park Cavern GA HA A Burton on a e 5 . R C D Y r l 1 DV D . Museum Calke on the Hill a C S RD e l Trent N rd n 5 ’S A T L r a a fo sh a y KE 5 . RA F w f ir U 2 D U ATE n Abbey v e C D E . EASTG Staunton i a M a A511 Hathern c H L e t F T Cathedral T g I L C B587 & l R A R n a 0 1/4 Mile S e e I C G t S E Harold r A O A y A t W i w R S e T N i Derby T D A518 o h T s Reservoir o s E N r Worthington r . ce er a G E O e LEICESTERSHIRE n st y AT W Burton on 0 400 Metres E City R W M A60 Pickfords DE RD. M Hartshorne A6 EA & Centre D t Trent Newhall A514 M1 House D O n M6 A513 R WA W e Staunton R Assembly A515 r Museum O DW R T F I D F . C Rooms . Harold Hall
T K C Swadlincote A42 Loughborough B A M
T S O . O . T D V R M . S . T K S Bus
S A34 D S IC
A449 R A R T N T O t T A T T O . R R n A444 B5324 O D O L Key EW E R E E Stn. e B5014 B I B D A38 C N A L r R R K ST. A T. G T K K E B C S S E To Leicester R T E S R Long Eaton E T A514 T
X E
A O TO B . S T Woodville
P T Y A A511 L U E O P E r A N A51 6 Market e On road cycle route County boundary E C 1 E Conkers . M B 5 S M O A A T v B5324 C i G R u K E R E L T LIN . S R E A T N T R
. . Sharpes Pottery L L t N Circuit O E E RY ’ b E S S S L D G EW M A Eagle ID B586 Toton R L D O Rosliston r D T Derwent Valley Mills E E S AL 4.5 miles Thringstone Off road cycle route N . E T M o ST S A R . Centre R o OLF C C D Forestry World Heritage Site W I . A512 1 S k IA F Rugeley N T N STRE R E F P Centre S T L E E IV P R Proposed off road route B T E W A A E T A E I P R R R D I E R R A T T r A R K E Linton R E S R G E 6 Bus station R a R Y The A . W E i T T B5003 T O i ver T G T A A512 0 Kings Bromley T E S Y Rosliston
G l S E E E A W ET r E e 1 E Conkers R T TR SpotA513 E w D R E S ash . Trans Pennine Trail S L T . R Ashby-de- ST R
M L S H K K Forest Centre Rail line and station L A A ROO A513 R
A N B N R L E
O A K A T T
C E M C O O R la-Zouch G ST A TO G C H
R M R A511 Pennine Bridleway
O L L Y Moira O E
F O A Supertram C R T
R V N N A H W N Derby
O E 0 1/4 Mile A O D A W E Y Overseal W T C L H N
A O V D Alrewas R I A A l N A Coalville I B5014 a Station A National Cycle Network D D A U e T O O O n Y R NGHAM B a R I Tourist railway
TI r
Penkridge T ROAD Y A 6 NOT 0 400 Metres R T. CO R O A R B 0 S y S O . i N outside Derbyshire
DE 0 5 RD. M Tr D se M A D t AL
A460 O r R a e A D s Hicks Lodge For further detail please refer to the O n O e D F A511
S U h tW M N g O Derby Cycle Route Guide available from N N T A R National Forest M & O A L e E T R D b National Forest S A N 6 I T C S A H M NCN route sign D R Derby City Council, Tel: (01332) 715017 T C y A P R . R T O Long Eaton O Cycling Centre R L K www.derby.gov.uk A515 D P E . E S . r W R S A42 Built-up Area ILSTHO T RD. a W Town Centre Library S N i o HednesfordT TIO l Tour de France Stage 2 H . TA A51 u A447 IGH S 3 ld Wilsthorpe ST. m s Relief Shading Tourist Information Centre A449 A444 ile Cycle lockers W s Measham LO M To Birmingham Visitor Centre Y I B4154D W A L l A ER I 1400 ft and above A S A34 h i O N A5192 Cycle Hire T s a R S BR S River Mease W H a r T. O T. Ibstock R O O Place of interest w T K Poole’s Cavern O C R H RA ET D. e T T NFLE P R y D B4116 BY r e R OA 1000-1400 ft Long distance footpath O WAY E RES E l R Coventry Canal THO l O C EYS M a O L A513 Car Parking H W L K (walking route only) A5 LI OA A5190 A V M N A5192 W GW
R A A T T O LE V O A E H O B5493 800-1000 ft Youth Hostel ED . D Burntwood V O O A River/Canal 1 D R R Lichfield D N D M RD. New E . ALE Cannock L A461 FED Y AR W H A N Sawley V Y D 400-800 ft W E V E . © Crown Copyright and E . E N E AL M6 R A5 V Kilometres 0 12345678 Kilometres RI LESD N A BB A D. V R A34 E A51 database rights 2014. Long Eaton . M42 A449 0 1/4 Mile Station D 0-400 ft Miles 0 12345 Miles ROA Ordnance Survey 100023251. FIELDS FARM A5 0 400 Metres Produced by 20.3.14 www.fwt.co.uk
A38
Colour-coding by SEVERITY Total Accidents (6)
Fatal (0)
Serious (2)
Slight (4)
+ Crown copyright and database rights SCALE 1 : 4720 Glossop Road Gamesley Derbyshire Constabulary Licence No. 100021015 2011 DATE 14/03/2018
DRAWING No.
DRAWN BY Alison Morse Selected Range of Accidents between dates 01/09/2012 and 31/08/2017 Selected using Manual Selection [email protected] TRAFFMAP INTERMEDIATE ACCIDENT REPORT Run on: 14/ 03/2018 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Details of Personal Injury Accidents for Period - 01/09/2012 to 31/08/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query :
Vehicles Casualties Police Ref. Day Location Description Veh No / Type / Manv / Dir / Class / Sev Date Road No. 2nd Road No. Time Grid Ref. D/L R.S.C Weather Speed
0002908/13 Thursday Gamesley A626 Glossop Road Veh 1 Car Going ahead SW to NE 03/10/201 Veh 2 Car Wait go ahead held SW to NE Dri Slight R1: A 626 1745 hrs Veh 3 Car Waitup go ahead held SW to NE up E 401,320 Wet/Damp N 394,296 Fine without high winds 30 mph
0005529/14 Tuesday Gamesley A626 Glossop Rd at j/w UC, Veh 1 Car Going ahead NE to SW Ped Slight 25/02/201 Cottage Lane R1: A 626 1530 hrs R2: U E 401,429 Dry N 394,357 Fine without high winds 30 mph
0015755/15 Thursday Glossop A626 Glossop Road Veh 1 Car Going ahead NE to SW RSP Serious 10/09/201 Veh 1 Car Going ahead NE to SW Dri Slight R1: A 626 1655 hrs Veh 2 Car Parked 0 to 0
E 401,243 Dry N 394,250 Fine without high winds 30 mph
Registered to: Derbyshire Constabulary 1 TRAFFMAP INTERMEDIATE ACCIDENT REPORT Run on: 14/ 03/2018 AccsMap - Accident Analysis System
Details of Personal Injury Accidents for Period - 01/09/2012 to 31/08/2017 (60) months Selection: Notes: Selected using Pre-defined Query :
Vehicles Casualties Police Ref. Day Location Description Veh No / Type / Manv / Dir / Class Sex / Age / Sev Date Road No. 2nd Road No. Time Grid Ref. D/L R.S.C Weather Speed
0016624/15 Sunday Glossop A626 Glossop Road at j/w UC, Veh 1 Car Stopping NW to SE Dri M 31 Serious 08/11/201 Melandra Castle Road R1: A 626 1755 hrs R2: U Darkness: street lights present E 401,182 Wet/Dampa N 394,211 Raining with high winds 30 mph
0016751/15 Tuesday Glossop A626 Glossop Road at j/w UC, Veh 1 Car Going ahead NE to SW Dri Slight 17/11/201 Melandra Castle Road 2 Car Turning right NE to NW Dri Slight R1: A 626 0600 hrs R2: U Darkness: street lights present E 401,181 Wet/Dampa N 394,215 Fine without high winds 30 mph
1700848 Monday GAMESLEY A626 GLOSSOP RD J/W Veh 1 Car Turning left SW to NW 27/03/201 MELANDRA CASTLE RD (IPQA) Veh 2 Pedal cycle Going ahead SW to NE Dri Slight R1: A 626 1855 hrs R2: U Daylight:street lights present E 401,178 Dry N 394,214 Fine without high winds 30 mph
Registered to: Derbyshire Constabulary 2
R10m
R10m