DOCSLIB.ORG

National Otter Survey of England Has for the First Time Achieved Comprehensive Coverage of the Whole Country

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Fifth otter survey of England 2009 - 2010 Technical report We are The Environment Agency. It's our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. This document has been produced in partnership with: Author - Andrew Crawford (Environment Published by: Agency) Environment Agency Project Manager - Graham Scholey Rio House (Environment Agency) Waterside Drive, Aztec West Main survey contractors - Elizabeth Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD Andrews, Hilary Marshall, John Martin, Tel: 0870 8506506 Email: enquiries@environment- Robin Roper, Andy Rothwell, Mark Satinet agency.gov.uk Alternate squares surveyors - see www.environment-agency.gov.uk acknowledgements © Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available from our publications catalogue: All rights reserved. This document may be http://publications.environment- reproduced with agency.gov.uk or our National Customer prior permission of Contact Centre: T: 08708 506506 the Environment Agency. E: [email protected]. - 2 - Summary The fifth national otter survey of England has for the first time achieved comprehensive coverage of the whole country. Two field survey techniques were used in parallel – full surveys for sites investigated in previous national surveys (the main survey), and spot- checks for all the alternate 50km squares not covered in the previous surveys. The main survey was carried out between July 2009 and March 2010. Six highly experienced otter surveyors examined 3327 sites across the country using thirty-eight 50 x 50 km squares (the north-west and south-east quarters of each 100km square) as a sampling grid. Footprints and droppings (spraints) represent the most distinctive signs of otter and their presence within the standard 600m survey length of river represented a ‘positive’ site record. Signs of otters were recorded at 1874 (56%) of sites in the main survey. In addition, the alternate squares spot-checks undertaken within the same time frame proved otter presence in 553 of the 718 10km squares surveyed. Direct comparison of positive records from 2940 sites used in all five national surveys reveals the recovery of otters from virtual extinction in most of England during the early 1970s. Positive site records increased from 5.8 per cent in 1977-79, to 9.6 per cent in 1984-86; 23.4 per cent in 1991-94; 36.3 per cent in 2000-02 and 58.8 per cent in 2009-10. Recovery has continued in all but the very south-east where no signs were found in Kent or most of Sussex. Re-colonisation from strongholds in south-west and northern England and Wales has now been consolidated across much of the country and continues to drive recovery. Since 2000-02 there has been a major link-up across several river catchments. For example, there is no longer a gap in otter distribution between the south-west, south Wales, lower Wye and Severn and upper Thames. Similarly, there is now a link between populations in East Anglia, the River Trent catchment, Yorkshire and the traditional Northumbria stronghold. The pattern of recovery differs at a regional scale, with Thames showing the biggest increase in positive signs since 2000-02. In South-West Region and the River Wye catchments otter populations have probably reached a level approximating to carrying capacity, with those in Northumbria, Cumbria, Wessex and the upper Severn close to that. Elsewhere, further recovery and consolidation will take more time. Recovery has been in response to three main factors, the ban on pesticides that caused extinction of otters from many parts of England in the 1960s and early 1970s, legal protection for the otter since 1978, and the significant improvement in water quality in previously fishless rivers since the 1970s. Re-introduction programmes of captive bred and re-habilitated otters in certain parts of the country are likely to have speeded up the recovery locally in East Anglia, Yorkshire and the upper Thames. However the majority of the recovery has been the result of natural expansion from the remnant populations. The prospects are for full recovery across England probably within the next two decades or so. This represents a major success story for pollution control, as well as investment by the water industry and efforts by landowners and river managers to improve river and riparian habitat. Tracking the otter’s recovery has demonstrated the benefits of long-term monitoring and the use of this iconic species to raise awareness of pollution problems and the benefits of action to improve the environment. - 3 - The revised (2006) Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) target for otters in England was for at least 997 10km squares to show signs of otter occupation by 2010 and for 1084 10km squares to show signs of otter occupation by 2015. The 2015 target has already been exceeded, with 1085 squares showing signs of occupation in either the main survey or alternate squares spot-checks. The recovery has thus proceeded at a slightly faster rate than expected in 2006 but is still close to, or slightly below the expected recovery curve published by Strachan and Jefferies (1996). The continued recovery has brought an increase in the number of reported otter road kills. These have nearly doubled from 313 reported deaths on the road during the four year period 2002 to 2005 to 600 in the four year period 2006 to 2009. These and other dead otters reported to the Environment Agency form the basis of the programme of otter post mortem and tissue analysis undertaken with Cardiff University and the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology. This work has shown that the current suite of chemicals monitored in otter tissue has declined to levels where they should not cause significant pathology. One of the results of the recovery of otter populations has been increased concern about predation, particularly on still water fisheries and on specimen fish. This creates a challenge to all those involved in river, wetland and fishery management to ensure that the successful return of our top freshwater predator is not seen as a long term problem for fisheries but as a symbol of a healthy ecosystem. - 4 - Contents Introduction 6 Methods 8 Overall results for England 11 Map 1 Alternate 50km squares used in survey 12 Table 1 results for 2009-10 survey by region and comparison with other surveys 13 Table 2 Summary of Results by 50km square 14 Fig 1 Change in percentage of positive sites by region 16 Maps 2-6 Percentage positive by region (1977-79 to 2009-10) 17 - 21 Maps 7-11 Positive/new positive (1977-79 to 2009-10) 22 - 26 Map 12 Otter distribution by 10km square 27 Map 13 Catchment (Leap) areas in England 28 The regional reports introduction 29 (Regional reports each with maps) North West 30 Northumbrian 36 Yorkshire 40 Dee 45 Severn 48 Trent 52 Wye 57 Anglian 60 Thames 67 South West 72 Wessex 79 Southern 85 Mink 90 Map 26 Mink distribution 2000-02 93 Map 27 Mink distribution 2009-10 94 Map 28 Mink distribution by 10km square 95 Otter sightings - PTES 96 Discussion 97 Otters and fisheries 108 Priorities for future action 112 Conclusions 114 Funding 116 Acknowledgements 117 References 120 Appendix 1 Typical site map 124 Appendix 2 Section of main survey spreadsheet 125 Appendix 3 Alternate squares recording sheet 126 - 5 - 1.0 Introduction The Eurasian or European otter (Lutra lutra) is widely recognised as an emblem for nature conservation in the UK because it is a top predator and important biological indicator of the health of our rivers and wetlands. Monitoring the status of the otter therefore gives us a valuable measure of the state of our water and wetland ecosystems. In England it is a largely nocturnal animal and is rarely observed in the wild. It is however possible to detect its presence by searching for faeces (spraints) and footprints. The otter suffered serious declines throughout most of its European range, and by the mid 1970s the UK otter population had been reduced to a point where they only existed in Scotland, parts of Wales and the West Country with a few remnant populations in other parts of England. Conservation action for the otter in Britain has a long history with many players fulfilling different roles. The Environment Agency is now the contact point for otter conservation under the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) and is a lead partner with the Wildlife Trusts in implementing the Otter Species Action Plan. The Otter BAP Steering Group also includes representatives from the statutory nature conservation bodies – Natural England (NE), Countryside Council for Wales (CCW), Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), the Northern Ireland Environment Agency and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) as well as Water UK (umbrella body for the water companies), the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), the Department of Agriculture (N.I.) and the Wildlife Trusts. The first national otter survey of England was carried out in 1977-79 (Lenton et al., 1980). It provided a baseline for the distribution of otters and, together with surveys in Wales, Scotland and Ireland (Crawford et al., 1979; Green & Green, 1980; Chapman & Chapman, 1982), was undertaken in response to growing concern for the status of the otter in Britain (O’Connor et al., 1977). Of the 2,940 sites surveyed in England in 1977-79, only 170 (5.8%) showed evidence of otters. This confirmed the results of the analysis of hunting records (Anon, 1969, 1974; Chanin & Jefferies, 1978), the impression of many naturalists (Walker, 1970, Howes, 1976, Lloyd, 1962) and the results of a volunteer survey by the Mammal Society (O’Connor et al., 1977) that there had been a major decline in otter distribution.
Recommended publications
  • Two, Possibly Three Underground Workings (Connected History. a Full Archival Search Has Not Been Undertaken, However, Arkell

    Two, Possibly Three Underground Workings (Connected History. a Full Archival Search Has Not Been Undertaken, However, Arkell

    Reprinted from: Glouoestershire Society for Industrial Archaeology Journal for 1994 pages 23-27 UNDERGROUND QUARRX'WORKIHGS AT QUARRY WOOD, SHERBORHE PARK, GLOUCESTERSHIRE. Arthur J Price. Two, possibly three underground workings (connected underground) are situated in the south west corner of the open quarry at Quarry Wood, Sherborne Park, Gloucestershire, National Grid Reference SP 16561408, altitude 165 m. They were surveyed with the permission and help of the National Trust in September 1993. Total surveyed length: 140 m, and vertical range 3.92 m. A copy of this report was sent to the National Trust who are undertaking an archaeological appraisal of the Park. History. A full archival search has not been undertaken, however, Arkell (1947) records the use of ‘Sherborne Stone‘ at Windsor, and later Oxford, from 1365. More specifically, Hull (1857) shows an engraving of the open quarry at Quarry Wood. He makes no mention of underground workings, but does at nearby Windrush where the quarry was worked underground before 1840. Arkell states that three galleries could be entered at Quarry Wood in the 1940s and that the quarry had remained in use until 1915 for estate use. This type of underground quarry came within the scope of various Government Mining and Quarrying Acts from c. 1880, however Sherborne does not appear in these mineral lists. No datable evidence was found underground for primary working, but the above data and more specifically the style of working, deterioration of wooden props, etc, points probably to a date c. 1860 - 1880, unless they were later worked illegally‘. Subsequent to the survey, members of the Gloucester Speleological Society found clay pipe.
  • New Forest Audax Events on 23Rd May 2021 Starting from Lymington

    New Forest Audax Events on 23Rd May 2021 Starting from Lymington

    New Forest Audax Events on 23rd May 2021 Starting from Lymington. (Open air public space – according to restrictions in force at the time) There will be no arranged refuelling venues as controls. Proof of passage will be by gathering “information controls” as you travel. There are many opportunities for refreshment on the courses but to avoided the risk of crowding specific places it will be up to riders to decide where, and if, to stop. New Forest Excursion – 207km (125miles) This event explores every corner and all of the varied New Forest landscapes. The route visits Burley, the western escarpment of the Forest in the Avon Valley, the edge of the Wiltshire Downs, and Cranborne Chase, before returning through the heart of the Forest across Stoney Cross plain through Lyndhurst and Beaulieu to the Solent coastal nature reserve at Lepe. Then a loop back northwards to Redlynch and Hale before a grand finale down the Ornamental Drives, through Brockenhurst and more coastal fringes to the Arrivee. Entry fee: £5 (+ £3 temporary membership fee, if you are not a member of AUK or CTC) Includes: Route sheet, gpx track, brevet card, and AUK validation fee . Enter via the Audax Uk Website Here: https://audax.uk/event-details?eventId=9013 New Forest Day Out - 107km (66miles) This event explores the centre and west of the New Forest with a turning point at the Braemore near Fordingbridge. Entry fee: £4 (No SAE required for postal entries.) (+ £3 temporary membership fee, if you are not a member of AUK or Cycling UK) Includes: Route sheet, gpx track, brevet card and AUK validation fee.
  • River Mease SAC Developer Contribution Scheme 2 Appendix

    River Mease SAC Developer Contribution Scheme 2 Appendix

    Appendix 1: Measures to be funded through the Developer Contributions Scheme 2 (DCS2) FINAL VERSION (June 2016) The need for DCS2 has been identified in response to the development allocations within the North West Leicestershire District Council Local Plan, which is currently being finalised. The Local Plan was subject to assessment under the Habitats Regulations1 and the Developer Contribution Scheme was identified as a key mechanism to provide NWLDC with the necessary confidence that development allocated within the catchment of the river will not be likely to have a significant effect on the River Mease SAC. The HRA of the Local Plan identified the need for DCS2 to deliver mitigation to facilitate the delivery of 1826 dwellings. On the basis of the estimated P loadings to the river from receiving works provided in E&F of DCS2, an estimate of phosphate contributions from these dwellings represents an increased loading of 329g P/day. Of critical importance to the development of DCS2, is an agreement which has been reached since the development and implementation of DCS1. Following recent discussions between Natural England, the Environment Agency and Severn Trent Water, the following statement has been issued. Severn Trent, Environment Agency and Natural England have assessed the options to meet the SAC conservation objectives in relation to flow and phosphate, and agree that pumping sewage effluent from Packington and Measham sewage works out of the Mease catchment is the most effective long term solution. The primary reason to move flow out of the River Mease catchment would be to ensure the SAC flow targets are met.
  • The River Thames Phosphate Mode

    The River Thames Phosphate Mode

    HP NRA RIV NRA The River Thames Phosphate Mode/ Improvements on the River Colne model -* Investigation o f high decay rates -*■ Effects of phosphate stripping at STWs Gerrie Veldsink March 19% CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 THE NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY AND WATER QUALITY PLANNING 2 2.1 The National River Authority 2.2 The water Quality Planning Section in the Thames Region 3 3 THE RIVER THAMES PHOSPHATE MODEL 4 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 TOMCAT 6 4 COLNE MODEL IMPROVEMENTS 8 4.1 River Colne 8 4.2 Modelling the River Colne 9 4.2.1 Introduction 9 4.2.2 Data input 10 4.2.2.1 Flow upstream of the STWs 10 4.2.2.2 Flow downstream of the bifurcation 11 4.2.2.3 The accretional flow 11 4.2.2.4 The concentration of phosphate in the accretional flow 11 4.2.2.5 Flow and quality of discharge from STWs 11 4.2.2.6 Flow and quality of the River Misbourne 11 4.2.2.7 Sources of data and important files 12 4.2.2.8 Differences between the original model and the model in this study 13 4.2.3 Calibration (OctobeLl992 to October 1994) 14 4.2.4 Validation (lanuary 1982 to lanuary 1984) 15 4.2.5 Sensitivity ofJheXolne Mode\ 16 4.3 Conclusion 1 7 5 WORK ON THE RIVER THAMES MODEL 18 5.1 Introduction 18 5.2 Order of STW 18 5.3 High Decay Rates 18 5.3.1 Introduction 18 5.3.2 Reducing high decay rates 19 5.3 Effects of phosphate stripping at STWs 23 5.4 Conclusion 24‘ REFERENCE 25 APPENDICES Acknowledgement ACKNOWLEDGEMENT With great pleasure I fulfilled a three month practical period at the NRA Thames Region in Reading.
  • Boating on Sussex Rivers

    Boating on Sussex Rivers

    K1&A - Soo U n <zj r \ I A t 1" BOATING ON SUSSEX RIVERS NRA National Rivers Authority Southern Region Guardians of the Water Environment BOATING ON SUSSEX RIVERS Intro duction NRA The Sussex Rivers have a unique appeal, with their wide valleys giving spectacular views of Chalk Downs within sight and smell of the sea. There is no better way to enjoy their natural beauty and charm than by boat. A short voyage inland can reveal some of the most attractive and unspoilt scenery in the Country. The long tidal sections, created over the centuries by flashy Wealden Rivers carving through the soft coastal chalk, give public rights of navigation well into the heartland of Sussex. From Rye in the Eastern part of the County, small boats can navigate up the River Rother to Bodiam with its magnificent castle just 16 miles from the sea. On the River Arun, in an even shorter distance from Littlehampton Harbour, lies the historic city of Arundel in the heart of the Duke of Norfolk’s estate. But for those with more energetic tastes, Sussex rivers also have plenty to offer. Increased activity by canoeists, especially by Scouting and other youth organisations has led to the setting up of regular canoe races on the County’s rivers in recent years. CARING FOR OUR WATERWAYS The National Rivers Authority welcomes all river users and seeks their support in preserving the tranquillity and charm of the Sussex rivers. This booklet aims to help everyone to enjoy their leisure activities in safety and to foster good relations and a spirit of understanding between river users.
  • Action for Nature

    Action for Nature

    Action for Nature A Strategic Approach to Biodiversity, Habitat and the Local Environment for Leicestershire County Council Published June 2021 Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Guiding Principles of our Approach 4 3. Legislative and Policy Context 5 4. Biodiversity and Natural Capital 18 5. Opportunities for Delivering the Biodiversity Objectives 28 6. Development and Implementation of the Delivery Plan 31 Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms 34 Appendix 2: Priority Habitats and Species in Leicestershire 37 Appendix 3: National Character Areas of Leicestershire 38 Appendix 4: Accessible Countryside & Woodland in 42 Leicestershire Appendix 5: Larger versions of maps used in document 44 Appendix 6: Sources of data 50 Action for Nature A Strategic Approach to Biodiversity, Habitat and the Local Environment for Leicestershire County Council 1. Introduction Working together for the benefit of everyone: Leicestershire County Council’s Strategic Plan 2018 to 20221 commits the Council to being ‘a carbon neutral organisation by 2030, to use natural resources wisely and to contribute to the recovery of nature’. The Council’s Environment Strategy 2018-20302, provides the vision behind this commitment: ‘We will minimise the environmental impact of our own activities and will improve the wider environment through local action. We will play our full part to protect the environment of Leicestershire., We will tackle climate change and embed environmental sustainability into what we do.’ This vision is supported by several aims and objectives that
  • Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021

    Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021

    Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2016 - 2021 Final June 2016 Nottinghamshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Review Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Rev Date Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 August 2013 Outline Local Flood Risk Hannah Andy Wallace, Gary Wood, Group Management Strategy for O’Callaghan, Flood Risk Manager Highways Consultation Flood Risk Manager Planning, Access Management and Officer (Project Commissioning Manager) (Project Executive) 2 December Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling 2014 Strategy – Draft for Client Water and Principal Associate Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant (URS) (URS) (URS) 3 June 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Second Draft for Water and Principal Associate Client Comment Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM (formerly URS) (Formerly URS) (Formerly URS) 4 July 2015 Local Flood Risk Management Amy Ruocco, Sarah Kelly, Carl Pelling Strategy – Final Draft for Water and Principal Associate Consultation Flood Risk Consultant Consultant AECOM AECOM AECOM 5 October Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Andy Wallace Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager AECOM 6 December Local Flood Risk Management Derek Hair Clive Wood Transport and 2015 Strategy – Final Draft for Highways Principal Project Flood Risk Consultation Committee Engineer Manager 7 June 2016 Local Flood Risk Management Derek
  • RIVER SEVERN LOWER REACHES CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT SUMMARUSJ5.___ ~-Q

    RIVER SEVERN LOWER REACHES CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT SUMMARUSJ5.___ ~-Q

    NRA Severn-Trent 30 RIVER SEVERN LOWER REACHES CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT SUMMARUSJ5.___ ~-q. divers jtion Cem oo )ffice > N o | Ac ~*«uwon No A NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region RIVER SEVERN LOWER REACHES CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT SUMMARY 1995 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Catchment Management Planning 1 The Catchment Management Plan Process 2 YOUR VIEWS 2 Vision Statement 3 KEY DETAILS 6 CATCHMENT OVERVIEW 8 Introduction 8 ► Land Use 9 Geology 10 Hydrology 10 Water Resources 11 Water Quality 12 Flood Defence 13 Fisheries 15 Conservation, Landscape and Heritage 15 Recreation and Navigation 16 Infrastructure 17 ISSUES AND OPTIONS 18-42 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 099822 INTRODUCTION The National Rivers Authority (NRA) was created in 1989 as an independent agency in England and Wales to protect and improve the water environment. The NRA has a wide range o f responsibilities for the control of the water environment, in particular: • conservation of water resources • pollution control • flood defence and flood warning • maintenance and improvements o f fisheries • nature conservation in water related habitats • promotion of water based recreation • control of navigation in some areas CATCHMENT The NRA’s vision for the future is of a healthy and diverse water MANAGEMENT PLANNING environment managed in an environmentally sustainable way balancing the needs of all users of water. To achieve this vision, the NRA is taking an integrated approach (ie bringing together its own activities and those of other groups and organisations) to management o f river catchments. A river catchment is an area of land which is drained by a river system.
  • Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ

    Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ

    This is a post-print version of an article which will appear The London Journal, 40(3) (2015), Special Issue: 'London's River? The Thames as a Contested Environmental Space'. Accepted 15 July 2015. Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ. of Greenwich, [email protected] I Introduction For the novelist A.P. Herbert in 1967 the problem with the Thames was simple. 'London River has so many mothers it doesn’t know what to do. ... What is needed is one wise, far- seeing grandmother.’1 Herbert had been campaigning for a barrage across the river to keep the tide out of the city, with little success. There were other, powerful claims on the river and numerous responsible agencies. And the Thames was not just ‘London River’: it runs for over 300 miles from Gloucestershire to the North Sea. The capital’s interdependent relationship with the Thames estuary highlights an important problem of governance. Rivers are complex, multi-functional entities that cut across land-based boundaries and create interdependencies between distant places. How do you govern a city that is connected by its river to other communities up and downstream? Who should decide what the river is for and how it should be managed? The River Thames provides a case study for exploring the challenges of governing a river in a context of changing political cultures. Many different stories could be told about the river, as a water source, drain, port, inland waterway, recreational amenity, riverside space, fishery, wildlife habitat or eco-system.
  • Consultation on the Abolition of the Inland Waterways

    Consultation on the Abolition of the Inland Waterways

    www.defra.gov.uk Consultation on Government proposal to abolish the Inland Waterways Advisory Council August 2011 © Crown copyright 2011 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected] This document/publication is also available on our website at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/consult/open/ Any enquiries regarding this document/publication should be sent to us at: IWAC Consultation Inland Waterways Team Defra Area 3B Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Tel: 020 7238 6372 / 4805 Email: [email protected] Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Contents Scope of the consultation ............................................................................................................. 4 Basic Information ...................................................................................................................... 4 Background .............................................................................................................................. 6 Part 1 - Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................
  • Tidal Thames

    Tidal Thames

    1.0 Introduction The River Thames is probably the most recognised and best known river in the country and is often known as 'London's River' or 'Old Father Thames'. The River Thames was pivotal in the establishment of the city of London and people have lived along its banks for thousands of years. Today, over a fifth of the country’s population live within a few miles of it, and each day many thousands pass over, along and under it. The Thames is a transport route, a drain, a view, a site for redevelopment and, ever increasingly, a playground, classroom and wildlife corridor. Its habitats and species form an integral part of London’s identity and development. The tidal Thames of today is a good example of a recovering ecosystem and of great ecological importance not only to London, Kent and Essex but also to life in the North Sea and the upstream catchments of the upper Thames. Gravel foreshore, © Zoological Society of London The River Thames flows through Westminster with its high river embankments, overlooked by historic and modern buildings, crossed by seven bridges and overhung with hardy London Plane trees. In Westminster the river is tidal and exposes foreshore during low-tide over most of Tidal Thames this stretch. This foreshore is probably all that remains of the natural intertidal habitat that would have once extended The River Thames is probably the most recognised and best known river in the country and inland providing marsh and wetland areas. Within the Westminster tidal Thames plants, invertebrates and birds is often known as 'London's River' or 'Old Father Thames'.
  • River Avon at Bulford

    River Avon at Bulford

    River Avon at Bulford An Advisory Visit by the Wild Trout Trust June 2013 Contents Introduction Catchment and Fishery Overview Habitat Assessment Recommendations Making It Happen 2 Introduction This report is the output of a Wild Trout Trust visit undertaken on the Hampshire Avon on the Snake Bend Syndicate’s (SBS) water near Bulford, national grid reference (NGR) SU155428 to SU155428. The visit was requested by Mr Geoff Wilcox, who is the syndicate secretary and river keeper. The visit was focussed on assessing the habitat and management of the water for wild trout Salmo trutta. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions with Mr Wilcox. Throughout the report, normal convention is followed with respect to bank identification i.e. banks are designated Left Bank (LB) or Right Bank (RB) whilst looking downstream. Catchment and Fishery Overview The Hampshire Avon is recognised as one of the most important river habitats in the UK. It supports a diverse range of fish and invertebrates and over 180 different aquatic plant species. The Avon (and its surrounding water meadows) has been designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Special Area of Conservation (SAC); however, much of the Avon and its tributaries have been significantly modified for land drainage, agriculture, milling and even navigation. 3 The Avon begins its life as two separate streams known as the Avon West and the Avon East, rising near Devizes and the Vale of Pewsey respectively. The Avon West is designated as a SSSI whilst for reasons unknown, the Avon East is not.