South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v)

Site Assessments by Area

East Hampshire

1 2 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Index of Settlements

Settlements Page Binsted 5 Blackmoor 13 Blendworth 19 Bucks Horn Oak 25 Buriton 31 Chawton 39 Clanfield 45 Dockenfield 53 East Meon 57 East Worldham 69 Greatham 77 High Cross 85 Horndean 91

Liphook 99 Liss 107 Liss Forest 125 Lower Farringdon 130 Petersfield 137 Selborne 187 Sheet 197 Steep 209 Stroud 215 Upper Farringdon 223

3 4 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Binsted

5 6 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Binsted

EA002 Land at Clements Close Binsted Binsted Has Potential 12 12 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA003 Land East of Blacknest Road, Binstead Binsted Binsted Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be previously developed land is outside the settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

EA124 Land at Place Farm, The Street, Binsted Binsted Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

Total by Settlement 12 12 0 0

7 8 Site Reference Area EA002 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Clements Close Binsted

Parish Binsted

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Agricultural

Summary of Landscape Assessment Low/Medium Sensitivity The site is not widely visible and relates to the existing recent settlement pattern.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is considered suitable for a small number of dwellings, which is consistent with density and character of suitable? surrounding development and would retain the existing trees and hedgerow screening around the sites. The site is located within 5km of SPA and impact would need to be assessed. Yes

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated that the site would be available immediately. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There are power cables crossing the site and it would need to be demonstrated that these would not affect or development prevent potential development. If this can be resolved then there are no other reasons why development on the on the site site could not be achieved. achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.5 24 12 12 0 0

9 10 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Binsted

EA124 Land at Place Medium/High Sensitivity The site is within 5km of a Special No The is considered Yes There is no Yes The site does not Farm, The Street, Medium High Protection Area. The site is not available and has reason to indicate relate well to the Landscape Sensitivity considered to be well related to recently been why development existing settlement due to open and the settlement. submitted. on the site is not pattern and exposed nature of the achievable. development on the site and high visibility site would have a from local public right potential adverse of way. Poor impact on the connection with character and settlement. appearance of the landscape.

11 12 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Blackmoor

13 14 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Blackmoor

EA084 Land west of Church Cottages Blackmoor Selborne Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more net additional homes.

EA086 Land to the rear of Church Colleges, Blackmoor Selborne Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more net additional homes.

EA090 Land West of Bracken lane, Blackmoor Selborne Rejected 0 0 0 0 The loss of woodland is not considered acceptable and the site is located within 400m of a Special Protection Area.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

15 16 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Blackmoor

EA084 Land west of Medium/High Sensitivity The site is partially located within No The site is in Yes There are power Yes The site is not Church Cottages to the type of the Blackmoor Conservation single ownership cables running considered suitable to development within the Area. It is adjacent to three Grade and the owner along the western yield 5 or more net SHLAA thresholds, due II Listed Buildings to the north and has previously edge of the site additional homes. to setting of listed St Matthews Church (Grade II* indicated that the and it would need buildings and location Listed Building) to the north east. site would be to be within historic core. The site is located within 5km of a available demonstrated Special Protection Area. immediately. that these would not affect or prevent potential development. If this can be resolved then there are no other reasons why development on the site could not be achieved.

EA090 Land West of Medium Sensitivity The site is within 400m of a No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The loss of woodland Bracken lane, The site is existing Special Protection Area. The site single ownership reason to indicate is not considered woodland in an area is part of a continuous tract of and the owner why development acceptable and the site subject to significant woodland which connects to has previously on the site is not is located within 400m redevelopment. Woolmer Forest to the east. indicated that the achievable. of a Special Protection There is a power line running site would be Area. along the western edge of the site. available The site is within a Mineral immediately. Consultation Area.

17 18 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Blendworth

19 20 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Blendworth

EA123 Land adjacent to Blendworth Church, Blendworth Horndean Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would Blendworth Lane have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

21 22 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Blendworth

EA123 Land adjacent to Medium/High Sensitivity The site is adajcent to the No The site is Yes There is no Yes Development on the Blendworth Medium-High settlement boundary and a grade considered to be reason to indicate site would have a Church, Sensitivity due to II listed church (located to the available for why development potential adverse Blendworth Lane relationship with south east). The site is development. on the site is not impact on the church yard and access surrounded by the conservation achievable. character and issues. Mature parkland area and a small part of the site is appearance of the setting of Blendworth witin the conservation area. landscape. house (rectory) to the north.

23 24 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Bucks Horn Oak

25 26 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Bucks Horn Oak

EA001 Holt Leigh House, Back Lane Bucks Horn Oak Binsted Has Potential 9 9 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

Total by Settlement 9 9 0 0

27 28 Site Reference Area EA001 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Holt Leigh House, Back Lane Bucks Horn Oak

Parish Binsted

Source Current Use Permission Residential

Summary of Landscape Assessment Low Sensitivity The site is Low Sensitivity due to the limited visibility and nature of site. Ecological impacts not assessed as part of this assessment.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is an existing residential property set in a large plot. It is surrounded by residential development except on suitable? the western boundary which abuts woodland, but this boundary is line with the adjacent residential properties. The site is adjacent to open access land, ancient woodland and a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation. It is Yes located within 5km of Special Protection Area and the impact on this would need to be assessed. Given its location within the settlement, the site is considered suitable for a small number of dwellings, consistent with the character and density of surrounding development. However, potential ecological impacts on nearby designated areas would need to be assessed.

Summary of Availability Is the site Planning permission was granted on 22nd October 2014 (after the base date of this study) available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.4 23 9 9 0 0

29 30 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Buriton

31 32 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Buriton

EA005 Land at Greenways and Kiln Lanes Buriton Buriton Has Potential 11 11 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA006 Land at Buriton House Buriton Buriton Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA007 Land at Greenways Lane Buriton Buriton Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

Total by Settlement 11 11 0 0

33 34 Site Reference Area EA005 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Greenways and Kiln Lanes Buriton

Parish Buriton

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Vacant Land

Summary of Landscape Assessment High/Medium Sensitivity The site is large and disproportionate to the scale of the settlement. The indirect impacts - traffic, highway design and activity of a large housing development would be significantly detrimental to local character and would mean that the site is High Sensitivity. There is an area of the site along Kiln Lane where a smaller development could be located and this would be within the middle field of the site along Kiln Lane frontage only, equal to the depth of existing plots. This would be Medium Sensitivity, a smaller site would be more consistent with the settlement pattern and with lesser highway and transport impacts in close proximity to the scarp slope

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is bounded by Greenways Lane and Kiln Lane where mature hedgerows screen the site from close view. suitable? The site rises to the west and north. There is a mainline railway line along the western boundary, beyond the railway line there is an area of Ancient Woodland. As the landscape assessment concludes, the site as a whole is not Yes suitable for development. It is consider that it may be suitable for a small amount of development along Kiln Lane, which is focused alongside the existing residential properties. The site is within 250m of an Historic Landfill Site.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated that the site would be available immediately. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Details of full assessment in Appendix D.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.4 28 11 11 0 0

35 36 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Buriton

EA006 Land at Buriton High Sensitivity The site is opposite the No The site is in Yes The land is raised Yes The site does not House The site does not conservation area and adjacent to single ownership above North relate well to the relate well to the the Grade II listed buildings and the owner Lane, therefore a existing settlement surrounding character located along North Lane. There has previously graded access pattern and features or settlement is a public right of way running indicated the site would need to be development on the pattern and would along the southern edge of the would be available achieved. site would have a affect the enjoyment of site. The site is elevated in with the first five potential adverse the public right of way relation to adjacent residential year period. impact on the which runs along the properties along North Lane and character and south side of the site. is in a prominent location. The appearance of the site does not have any shared landscape. boundaries with the settlement and is not well related to it. Therefore, the site is not considered suitable for development.

37 38 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Chawton

39 40 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Chawton

EA008 Land adjoining Winchester Road Chawton Chawton Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on heritage assets.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

41 42 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Chawton

EA008 Land adjoining High Sensitivity The site is a field in a prominent No The site is in Yes There is no Yes Development on the Winchester Road The site has High position alongside Winchester single ownership reason to indicate site would have a Sensitivity owing to its Road and is visible from a long and the owner why development potential adverse location at the entrance distance trail (St. Swithins Way). It has previously on the site is not impact on the to the settlement and shares a small part of boundary indicated the site achievable. character and the impact that a new with the settlement, but it is not would be available appearance of the access would have on well related to the settlement with the second landscape. the road, with the size boundary. The site is adjacent to five year period. Development on the of the site being the conservation area and 3 site would have a dominant in relation to Grade II listed buildings on the potential adverse the settlement and its northern and eastern boundary. impact on heritage features. Given the position of the site and assets. outcome of the landscape assessment (above), the site is not considered suitable for development.

43 44 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Clanfield

45 46 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Clanfield

EA009 Land west of North Lane Clanfield Clanfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA010 Land East of Little Hyden Lane Clanfield Clanfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA011 Land North of Hambledon Road Clanfield Clanfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

47 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA012 Land east of East Meon Road Clanfield Clanfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA013 Land west of East Meon Road Clanfield Clanfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

48 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Clanfield

EA009 Land west of High Sensitivity The site rises up to the north and No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not North Lane The site does not development of the site would be single ownership reason to indicate relate well to the relate to the settlement inconsistent with the surrounding and the owner why development existing settlement pattern and highway character and settlement form has previously on the site is not pattern and access would have which consists of mostly dispersed indicated the site achievable. development on the negative impact on the dwellings and farmsteads. The site would be available site would have a rural lane alongside the is adjacent to a Grade II Listed in the next 5 potential adverse site. The site would Building (located to the south of years. impact on the have a detrimental the site). Given the potential character and impact on the detrimental impact on the appearance of the surrounding downland landscape character and the landscape. and extend urbanising relationship with the settlement, influences into the the site is not considered suitable National Park. for development.

EA010 Land East of Little High Sensitivity The site rises up to the north and No The site is in Yes The site access Yes The site does not Hyden Lane The site does not development of the site would be single ownership would be via Little relate well to the relate to the settlement inconsistent with the surrounding and the owner Hyden Lane, existing settlement pattern and highway character and settlement form. has previously which is a narrow pattern and access would have The site does share boundaries indicated the site lane. Further development on the negative impact on the with surrounding residential would be available advice on site would have a rural lane alongside the development, but it is not in the next 5 potential for safe potential adverse site. The site would considered to relate well to the years. access point and impact on the have a detrimental settlement pattern. Therefore, impact of character and impact on the given the potential detrimental additional appearance of the surrounding downland impact on the landscape character development landscape. and extend urbanising and the relationship with the would need to be influences into the settlement, the site is not sought. There are National Park. considered suitable for no other reasons development. to indicate why development on the site could not be achieved.

EA011 Land North of High Sensitivity The site rises to the east and No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not 49 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA011 Land North of The site does not development of the site would be No single ownership Yes reason to indicate Yes relate well to the Hambledon Road relate to the settlement inconsistent with the surrounding and the owner why development existing settlement pattern and highway character and settlement. The site has previously on the site is not pattern and access would have does share a boundary with indicated the site achievable. development on the negative impact . The adjacent residential development would be available site would have a site would have a along Hambledon Road, but it is in the next 5 potential adverse detrimental impact on not considered to relate well to years. impact on the the surrounding the settlement pattern. Therefore, character and downland and extend given the potential detrimental appearance of the urbanising influences impact on the landscape character landscape. into the National Park. and the relationship with the settlement, the site is not considered suitable for development.

EA012 Land east of East High Sensitivity The site rises up to the north and No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not Meon Road The site does not development of the site would be single ownership reason to indicate relate well to the relate to the settlement inconsistent with the surrounding and the owner why development existing settlement pattern and highway character and settlement form has previously on the site is not pattern and access would have which consists of mostly dispersed indicated the site achievable. development on the negative impact on the dwellings and farmsteads. The site would be available site would have a rural lane alongside the does share boundaries with in the next 5 potential adverse site. The site would surrounding residential years. impact on the have a detrimental development, but it is not character and impact on the considered to relate well. appearance of the surrounding downland Therefore, given the potential landscape. and extend urbanising detrimental impact on the influences into the landscape character and the National Park. relationship with the settlement, the site is not considered suitable for development.

EA013 Land west of East High Sensitivity The site rises up to the north. No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not Meon Road The site does not The site is not well contained and single ownership reason to indicate relate well to the relate to the settlement a new boundary would need to be and the owner why development existing settlement pattern and highway created along the western edge of has previously on the site is not pattern and access would have the site. The site shares a indicated the site achievable. development on the negative impact on the boundary with settlement along would be available site would have a 50 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA013 Land west of East rural lane alongside the the eastern edge, but it is not No in the next 5 Yes Yes potential adverse Meon Road site. The site would considered to relate well to the years. impact on the have a detrimental existing settlement pattern. character and impact on the Therefore, given the potential appearance of the surrounding downland detrimental impact on the landscape. and extend urbanising landscape character and the influences into the relationship with the settlement, National Park. the site is not considered suitable for development.

51 52 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Dockenfield

53 54 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Dockenfield

EA121 Plainfield, Batts Corner Dockenfield Binsted Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

55 56 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

East Meon

57 58 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement East Meon

EA014 Land at the rear of Duncombe Road East Meon East Meon Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site is not currently considered to be achievable.

EA015 Land South of Coombe Road East Meon East Meon Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA016 Land east of Chapel Street East Meon East Meon Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA125 Land west of Garston Cottages, Coombe East Meon East Meon Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered Road suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes.

EA126 Land to the rear of 2 Garston Cottages East Meon East Meon Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes.

EA127 Land to the rear of 4 Kews Meadow, East Meon East Meon Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered Coombe Road suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes. 59 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA128 Land to the rear of Coombe Road East Meon East Meon Has Potential 5 5 0 0 Not Applicable. Terrace, (Deliverable)

EA129 Land off Workhouse Lane East Meon East Meon Has Potential 11 0 11 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA131 Garages off Hill View East Meon East Meon Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes.

EA132 Land off Anvil Close East Meon East Meon Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes.

EA133 Land south of Mill Cottage, Frogmore East Meon East Meon Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes.

EA134 Land north west of Garston Cottages, East Meon East Meon Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered Coombe Road suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes.

Total by Settlement 16 5 11 0

60 61 62 Site Reference Area EA128 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land to the rear of Coombe Road Terrace, East Meon

Parish East Meon

Source Current Use Submission Residential garden

Summary of Landscape Assessment Low Sensitivity Low Landscape sensitvity due to settlement location and existing character being suburban.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is located within the existing settlement boundary and includes parts of the rear gardens of a row of semi suitable? detached house. To the north of the gardens is a higher density residential development. Yes

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and has been identified through the neighbourhood plan process. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There are no reasons to indicate why development on the site could not be achieved. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.14 35 5 5 0 0

63 64 Site Reference Area EA129 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land off Workhouse Lane East Meon

Parish East Meon

Source Current Use Submission Sports and Recreation

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium/High Sensitivity Medium Sensitvity due to PDL and sporting character, Medium High if previously undeveloped due to edge of settleemnt locaiton and sensitvity of village green adjacent. Alternative sporting facilities required.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is bounded by trees and hedgerows, some of which are protected by Tree Preservation Orders. A small suitable? part of the site, along the northern boundary, is within flood zone 2 and 3. There is an existing sports pavilion and multi-use games area on the site and it would need to be demonstrated that these are no longer in use or could be Yes provided elsewhere. The site is situated between the village hall and village green to the east and a recreation ground to the west. Development of the site would need to retain connections to between these areas.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is being promoted by a single owner and is being considered through the neighbourhood plan. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site could not be achieved. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.5 22 11 0 11 0

65 66 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement East Meon

EA014 Land at the rear of Medium Sensitivity The site may be suitable for in Yes The site is in Yes There is a narrow No Development on the Duncombe Road The site is sensitive to principle, if it could be single ownership access lane to the site is not currently views from the west demonstrated that this would and the owner site. It would need considered to be and to the recreation sensitively designed, taking into has previously to be achievable. ground to the north. account its position within the indicated the site demonstrated Connections to the larger field and relationship to the would be available that safe access to recreation ground recreation ground. in the next 5 the site could be would seem to be years. achieved. desirable.

EA015 Land South of Medium/High Sensitivity The site is a small part of a larger No The site is in Yes A safe access Yes The site does not Coombe Road Medium/high sensitivity field which has been partitioned single ownership point to the site relate well to the due to quality and by relatively new boundary and the owner would need to be existing settlement character of existing planting. It is visible as a field rising has previously created; this pattern and settlement edge. away from Coombe Road. It is indicated the site would require development on the Development of this physically detached from the would be available removal of site would have a site would interrupt settlement boundary by Coombe in the next 5 existing potential adverse the existing landscape Road and the car park to the east. years. hedgerows. There impact on the structure to a Given the relationship of the site are no other character and significant degree. with the settlement and the reasons to appearance of the landscape assessment conclusions, indicate why landscape. above the site is not considered development on suitable for development. the site could not be achieved.

EA016 Land east of Medium/High Sensitivity The site is raised above Coombe No The site is in Yes A safe access Yes Development on the Chapel Street Due to quality and Road and is not currently visible. single ownership point to the site site would have a character of existing However development it is and the owner would need to be potential adverse settlement edge. expected that development on has previously created. It is impact on the Development of this the site would be visible from indicated the site expected that character and site would interrupt Coombe Road, which would be would be available access would be appearance of the the existing landscape imposing and detrimental to its in the next 5 via the existing landscape. structure to a sunken lane qualities. Part of the years. access to Coppice significant degree. site is covered by trees. There is a Cottages on the Grade II Listed Building adjacent corner of the 67 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA016 Land east of to the north of the site. The site No Yes bend. Yes Chapel Street is therefore not considered suitable for development.

68 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

East Worldham

69 70 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement East Worldham

EA100 Land at Blanket Street East Worldham Worldham Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. There is no evidence that the site is available or being actively promoted. Development on the site is not currently considered to be achievable.

EA101 Land at Park Farm, Blanket Street East Worldham Worldham Has Potential 11 11 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA102 Land west of Wyck Lane East Worldham Worldham Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

Total by Settlement 11 11 0 0

71 72 Site Reference Area EA101 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Park Farm, Blanket Street East Worldham

Parish Worldham

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Agricultural buildings

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium Sensitivity Due to potential impacts associated with converting the existing buildings to domestic use whilst retaining the rural and agricultural character of this location.

Summary of Suitability Is the site There is a Grade II Listed Building adjacent to the north. The site is located within 5km of a Special Protection Area. suitable? The site is considered suitable for low density development which would retain the existing character of the site through conversion of the existing agricultural buildings or a combination of conversion and new build. However, Yes given the conclusions of the landscape assessment this would required careful design to ensure that the existing rural character of the site and its relationship with the setting of the settlement and adjacent listed building was not affected.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available in the next 5 years. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.6 18 11 11 0 0

73 74 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement East Worldham

EA100 Land at Blanket High Sensitivity The site is within 5km of a Special No There is no No Due to change in No Development on the Street High sensitivity owing Protection Area. The site is in a recent evidence levels, access to site would have a to elevated position, prominent position due to its that the site is Caker Lane potential adverse poor relationship with elevated position. The site is available or is (B3004), is likely impact on the settlement pattern and adjacent to the settlement being actively to be problematic. character and views to higher ground boundary on the western edge, promoted. Re-grading likely appearance of the however development of this site to be detrimental landscape. There is no would not relate well to the to landscape evidence that the site is existing settlement pattern, being character. available or being inconsistent with the surrounding actively promoted. character and settlement form Development on the which consists of mostly dispersed site is not currently large dwellings and farmsteads. considered to be The site is not considered suitable achievable. for development.

EA102 Land west of Medium/High Sensitivity The site is located within 5km of a No The site is in Yes There is no Yes Development on the Wyck Lane The site is located in an Special Protection Area. Due to single ownership reason to indicate site would have a area of very dispersed the conclusions of the landscape and the owner why development potential adverse properties, and is in the assessment, the site is not has previously on the site is not impact on the foreground of considered suitable for indicated the site achievable. character and extensive local views development. would be available appearance of the and those from the in the next 5 landscape. Hangers Way. Elevated years. position and lack of landscape structure would make development very prominent and inconsistent with surrounding character.

75 76 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Greatham

77 78 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Greatham

EA021 Land to the South of Benhams Lane, Greatham Greatham Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is located within 400m Greatham of a Special Protection Area (SPA).

EA022 Liss Forest Nurseries, Petersfield Road Greatham Greatham Has Potential 68 0 0 68 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA024 Land North of Longmoor Road Greatham Greatham Rejected 0 0 0 0 Loss of woodland.

EA025 Land South of Wolfmere Lane Greatham Greatham Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA117 Land adjacent to Kings Holt, Petersfield Greatham Greatham Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be Road previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

Total by Settlement 68 0 0 68

79 80 Site Reference Area EA022 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Liss Forest Nurseries, Petersfield Road Greatham

Parish Greatham

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Horticulture

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium Sensitivity The size of the site and its location within the centre of the settlement makes it more sensitive than would normally occur for a site which is previously developed land.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is located in a prominent position on Petersfield Road. It is well screened behind a mature hedgerow, suitable? although the roofs of the existing glasshouses can be seen above this. There is a public right of way along the south eastern boundary, but views are limited. The site is located within a Mineral Consultation Area. There is a Special Yes Protection Area within 5km.

Summary of Availability Is the site The owner of the site has indicated that the site would become available in second or third 5 year period. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is The existing glasshouses would need to be cleared. This could result in high site preparation costs. There are no development other reasons to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 1.5 28 68 0 0 68

81 82 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Greatham

EA024 Land North of High Sensitivity The site is located within a No The site is in Yes There is no Yes Loss of woodland. Longmoor Road The site comprises Mineral Consultation Area. There single ownership reason to indicate woodland which is is a Special Protection Area within and the owner why development contiguous with the 5km. Due to the conclusions of has previously on the site is not western extremity of the landscape assessment, the site indicated the site achievable. Woolmer Forest to the is not considered suitable for would be available east. The site would development. within the first require clear felling and five years. this would significantly affect local amenity and enjoyment of the public right of way network.

EA025 Land South of Medium Sensitivity The site is well contained but is No The site is in Yes The current Yes The site does not Wolfmere Lane The site is not visible in not considered to be well related single ownership access is narrow relate well to the the wider landscape to the existing settlement pattern. and the owner and via an unmade existing settlement although it is visible Therefore, due to this and the has previously track. There are pattern and form an important landscape assessment conclusions indicated the site trees which are development on the bridleway connection. the site is not considered suitable would be available subject to Tree site would have a Development of this for development. The site is within the first Preservation potential adverse site would have a located within a Mineral five years. Orders on this impact on the detrimental impact on Consultation Area. There is a access. There are character and this and would extend Special Protection Area within no other reasons appearance of the urbanising influences 5km. to indicate why landscape. into the surrounding development on landscape. the site could not Improvements to be achieved. existing access track would affect its rural character.

83 84 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

High Cross

85 86 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement High Cross

EA019 Froxfield Flock Farm, Privett road High Cross Froxfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

87 88 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement High Cross

EA019 Froxfield Flock Medium/High Sensitivity The site is not adjacent to the No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not Farm, Privett road High sensitivity due to settlement boundary and not well single ownership reason to indicate relate well to the size of the site in related to the settlement. Based and the owner why development existing settlement relation to the village, on this and the landscape has previously on the site could pattern and the prominent location, assessment conclusions, the site is indicated the site not be achieved. development on the the age of the existing not considered suitable for would be available site would have a fieldscape. Area of development. within the first potential adverse existing buildings five years. impact on the reduces sensitivity in character and the southern part of appearance of the the site to landscape. Medium/High sensitivity although this is a large prominent area.

89 90 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Horndean

91 92 93 94 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Horndean

EA026 Land off Downhouse Road Horndean Horndean Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA027 Anchor Meadow, east of London Road Horndean Horndean Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA028 Land at Lovedean Lane (adjacent to Horndean Horndean Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be Kingswood) previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

95 96 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Horndean

EA026 Land off Medium/High Sensitivity The site rises to the south west No There is no No There is no Yes The site does not Downhouse Road The site is exposed to and is in a prominent position recent evidence reason to indicate relate well to the high levels of visibility in along Downhouse Road. There that the site is why development existing settlement a valley side location. are power lines which run available or is on the site is not pattern and The site is inconsistent through the site. There is a grade being actively achievable. development on the with surrounding II listed building to the north. The promoted. site would have a development patterns eastern edge of the site is located potential adverse and would introduce a within flood zone 2. As the impact on the large visible site within landscape assessment concludes, character and the National Park the site is not well related to the appearance of the which would appear existing settlement pattern is landscape. isolated and remote. detached from it by the road. Therefore, the site is not considered suitable for development.

EA027 Anchor Meadow, Medium/High Sensitivity The site slopes steeply to the No The site is in Yes An appropriate Yes Development on the east of London Medium/high sensitivity west and is visible from the other single ownership and safe access to site would have a Road in the lower part of site side of the valley. There is a public and the owner site would need potential adverse is due to connection right of way running along the has previously to be achieved. impact on the with surrounding north of the site. The south indicated the site There are no character and development, higher western corner of the site is abuts would be available other reasons appearance of the part of site to the east the Conservation Area. There is a within the first why development landscape. is high sensitivity Site of Importance for Nature five years. on the site could Conservation (SINC) adjacent. not be achieved. The south eastern corner of the site is adjacent to a group of tress subject to a Tree Preservation Order. There is an area of ancient woodland adjacent to the site (north eastern corner).

97 98 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Liphook

99 100 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Liphook

EA029 Land West of Bohunt Manor Barn, Liphook Bramshott and Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be Portsmouth Road Liphook previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement. The site is located within 400m of a Special Protection Area (SPA).

EA030 Land west of Hollycombe Close Liphook Bramshott and Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to Liphook the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. There is no evidence that the site is available or being actively promoted. Development on the site is not currently considered to be achievable.

EA031 Land South West of South Road Liphook Bramshott and Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to Liphook the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. There is no evidence that the site is available or being actively promoted.

101 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA032 Land adjoining Longmoor Road Liphook Bramshott and Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to Liphook the existing settlement and development on the site would have an unacceptable impact on landscape character.

EA033 Land at Bohunt Manor Liphook Bramshott and Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would Liphook have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

102 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Liphook

EA030 Land west of Medium/High Sensitivity The field is slopes to west, away No The site is Yes The existing No The site does not Hollycombe Close The site is exposed to from adjacent properties and the considered to be access from relate well to the long distance views site does not relate well to the available. Hollycombe Close existing settlement from the west, which existing settlement pattern. The is unsuitable and pattern and are currently rural and south the site is bounded by a narrow. development on the largely unaffected by byway, which is a historic sunken site would have a views of Liphook. lane although there are limited potential adverse views from this point. The site is impact on the within 5km of a Special Protection character and Area. Given the relationship to appearance of the the settlement and the landscape. There is no conclusions of the landscape evidence that the site is assessment, the site is not available or being considered suitable for actively promoted. development. Development on the site is not currently considered to be achievable.

EA031 Land South West High Sensitivity The site does not relate well to No The site is No There is no Yes The site does not of South Road The site is exposed to the existing settlement pattern. considered to be reason to indicate relate well to the long distance views The north of the site is bounded available. why development existing settlement from the west, which by a byway, which is a historic on the site is not pattern and are currently rural and sunken lane although there are achievable. development on the largely unaffected by limited views from this point. The site would have a views of Liphook. The site is within 5km of a Special potential adverse site is poorly related to Protection Area. Given the impact on the the settlement pattern relationship to the settlement and character and and would appear as a the conclusions of the landscape appearance of the very isolated assessment, the site is not landscape. There is no development. considered suitable for evidence that the site is development. 103 available or being Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA031 Land South West No No Yes actively promoted. of South Road

EA032 Land adjoining High Sensitivity There is a public right of way No Site has been Yes There is no Yes The site does not Longmoor Road The site is exposed to running along the north of the recently reason to indicate relate well to the long distance views site. The site is located within promoted and no why development existing settlement and from the south, which 5km of a Special Protection Area. evidence it is no on the site is not development on the are currently rural and Due to the conclusions of the longer available. achievable. site would have an largely unaffected by landscape assessment, the site is unacceptable impact on views of Liphook. The not considered suitable for landscape character. site is poorly related to development. the settlement pattern and would appear as a very isolated development in views from the south. Screening is unlikely to be successful owing to the sloping topography. Access to the site is likely to be detrimental to landscape character.

EA033 Land at Bohunt High Sensitivity There are numerous Tree No The owners of Yes There is no Yes Development on the Manor The site is located on a Preservation Orders in and the site have reason to indicate site would have a key connection to the around the boundary of the site. previously why development potential adverse public right of way The southern corner of the site is indicated the on the site is not impact on the network to the west, adjacent to the Little Boarhunt development achievable. character and and the experience of Grade II Registered Park and would be available appearance of the using this would be Garden and three Grade II Listed in the first five landscape. significantly affected by Buildings. There is a public right of years. There has development. The way running through the site. The been a recent pre- existing National Park site is located within 5km of a application boundary is well Special Protection Area. Due to enquiry on the 104 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA033 Land at Bohunt considered and is a well the conclusions of the landscape No site. Yes Yes Manor filtered line with assessment, the site is not development to the considered suitable for east of Portsmouth development. Road. Further development to the west has potential to affect the function of this line. The boundary of the site to the west is highly sensitive and extends far into the National Park away from the existing settlement.

105 106 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Liss

107 108 109 110 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Liss

EA034 Land at Inwood Road Liss Liss Has Potential 25 25 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA035 Old Berry Grove Farm, Farnham Road Liss Liss Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes.

EA036 Land adjoining Eden Lodge, Farnham Road Liss Liss Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA038 Land at Hilliers Nurseries, Andlers Ash Liss Liss Has Potential 100 50 50 0 Not Applicable. Road (Deliverable)

111 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA039 Land at Hawksmead Liss Liss Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. Potential impact on protected trees. There is no evidence that the site is available or being actively promoted.

EA040 Land at Clarks Farm, Huntsbottom Road Liss Liss Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA041 Land at Hilliers Nurseries, west of Liss Liss Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be Longhill Cottage, Hill Brow road previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

112 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA042 Land at Hilliers Nurseries, West of Liss Liss Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to Hangery, Hill Brow Road the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. There is no evidence that the site is available or being actively promoted.

EA043 Land at Farnham Road/Station Road Liss Liss Has Potential 30 30 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA109 Land at Andlers Ash Farm Liss Liss Excluded 0 0 0 0 The is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes.

EA119 Land at Hawkley Road Liss Liss Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

EA120 White Stones, Hill Brow Road Liss Liss Rejected 0 0 0 0 The is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes.

Total by Settlement 155 105 50 0

113 114 Site Reference Area EA034 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Inwood Road Liss

Parish Liss

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Vacant/Grassland

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium Sensitivity The site is contained within the settlement and is well screened, the topography and local design issues increase sensitivity for this site.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is well screened, including mature tree belts to the east and west, which includes trees protected by Tree suitable? Preservation Orders. Need for sensitive design which improves connections to the village, retains existing natural features and takes into account views for the wider area (particularly the Hangers). The site is located within 5km Yes of a Special Protection Area.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is being actively promoted for development, including through pursuit of planning applications on the site. available? Therefore, the site is considered to be available immediately. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is An acceptable and safe access would need to be created. There are no other reasons to indicate why development development on the site could not be achieved. on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.9 28 25 25 0 0

115 116 Site Reference Area EA038 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Hilliers Nurseries, Andlers Ash Road Liss

Parish Liss

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Horticulture

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium/High Sensitivity High sensitivity due to size and elevation of whole site. The northern part of the site that relates to Andlers Ash Road would be Medium/High Sensitivity due to the closer relationship with existing residential development to the north, and lower elevation of the site reducing visual impact.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The conclusions of the landscape assessment has concluded that the north section of the site is less elevated, suitable? reducing visual impact. This area is also more closely related to the settlement boundary. Therefore, it is considered suitable to focus development on this part of the site. The site is located within 5km of a Special Protection Area. Yes

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available within the first five available? years. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 4.5 22 100 50 50 0

117 118 Site Reference Area EA043 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Farnham Road/Station Road Liss

Parish Liss

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Horticulture

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium/High Sensitivity The whole site is a large scale site in a sensitive area and would be a dominating influence on the historic village if developed. The north western part of the site is Medium/High Sensitivity owing to its reduced scale, limited visibility and greater potential for screening.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is within a Mineral Consultation Area. The site is located within 5km of a Special Protection Area. There is suitable? a public right of way along the northern and western boundary of the site. There are protected trees along the southern boundary. The site is considered suitable for a small amount of development focused in the western part Yes of the site along Farnham Road. There is a public right of way running along the north eastern and north western boundary.

Summary of Availability Is the site The owners have previously indicated the site would be available immediately. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 1.5 20 30 30 0 0

119 120 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Liss

EA035 Old Berry Grove Medium/High Sensitivity The site is in close proximity to No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site is not Farm, Farnham The site is unlikely to the conservation area and Church single ownership reason to indicate considered suitable to Road support the level of of St Peter (a Grade II* Listed and the owner why development yield 5 or more development required Building). The site is located has previously on the site is not additional homes. due to the proximity to within 5km of a Special Protection indicated the site achievable. the Conservation area, Area. The site is slightly separated would be available the church and the low from the settlement policy within the first density of the existing boundary and due to the low five years. surrounding settlement density character of the pattern surrounding development, it is not considered to be well related to the wider settlement pattern. The site is located in a narrowing tract of land between the settlement and the A3. The Village Design Statement is clear on the need to maintain this separation. Part of the site is previously developed land. Therefore, the site may be considered suitable for redevelopment of a small number of dwellings in principle. However, the yield is expected to be lower than 5 units, which is the threshold for this study.

EA036 Land adjoining High sensitivity There is a public right of way No The owners of Yes The acquisition of Yes Development on the Eden Lodge, Due to proximity to running along the southern the site have third party land to site would have a Farnham Road historic core, large boundary of the site. The site is indicated the site provide suitable potential adverse mature trees along located within a Mineral would be available access is impact on the western boundary and Consultation Area. The site is within the first required. There character and aged field pattern of the within 5km of a Special Protection five years. are no other appearance of the site and the Area. Due to the conclusions of reasons to landscape. surrounding landscape the landscape assessment the site indicate why all being highly sensitive is not considered suitable for 121 development on Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA036 Land adjoining to developmental development. No Yes the site could not Yes Eden Lodge, change. be achieved.

EA039 Land at Medium/High Sensitivity The site is adjacent to residential No There is no No There is no Yes The site does not Hawksmead Due to proximity to development on the north west evidence that the reason to indicate relate well to the locally important public and south west boundaries but is site is available or why development existing settlement right of way network, separated from the road by the being actively on the site is not pattern and large mature trees recreation ground. Therefore, it is promoted. achievable. development on the surrounding the site not considered to be well related site would have a which would be under to the settlement pattern. There potential adverse pressure for removal are a number of protected trees impact on the and aged field pattern surrounding the site. Therefore, character and of the site and the the site is not considered suitable appearance of the surrounding landscape for development. landscape. Potential all being highly sensitive impact on protected to developmental trees. There is no change. evidence that the site is available or being actively promoted.

EA040 Land at Clarks High sensitivity The site is adjacent to a grade II No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not Farm, High sensitivity due to listed building. The site is located single ownership reason to indicate relate well to the Huntsbottom context of assart within 5km of a Special Protection and the owner why development existing settlement Road fieldscapes and Area. The south eastern corner of has previously on the site is not pattern and surrounding ancient the site is adjacent to a Tree indicated the site achievable. development on the trackways which would Preservation Order area. The site would be available site would have a be affected by is not considered to be well within the first potential adverse development related to the existing settlement five years. impact on the pattern. Due to this and the character and conclusions of the landscape appearance of the assessment the site is not landscape. considered suitable for development.

122 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA040 Land at Clarks Far No Yes Yes

EA042 Land at Hilliers High Sensitivity There is a public right of way No There is no No A safe access to Yes The site does not Nurseries, West Due to elevation on along the western boundary of evidence that the the site would relate well to the of Hangery, Hill the hillside and poor the site. The site is located within site is available or need to be existing settlement Brow Road relationship with 5km of a Special Protection Area. being actively created. There pattern and settlement pattern and The site is physically detached promoted for are no other development on the visual impact in a from the settlement policy development. reasons to site would have a prominent boundary and is not considered to indicate why potential adverse undeveloped site. be well related to the settlement. development on impact on the Given this and the conclusions of the site could not character and the landscape assessment, the site be achieved. appearance of the is not considered suitable for landscape. There is no development. evidence that the site is available or being actively promoted.

EA120 White Stones, Hill Medium Sensitivity There is a public right of way No The site is Yes There is no Yes The is not considered Brow Road Medium Landscape along the eastern boundary. The considered to be reason to indicate suitable to yield 5 or Sensitivity due to site is adjacent to a listed building. available and has why development more additional homes. location adjacent to The site is within 5km of a Special recently been on the site is not recreation ground and Protection Area. The submitted. achievable. public right of way, also redevelopment of the site (and settlement edge existing residential) property is location makes it more not considered suitable to yield 5 sensitive. or more net dwellings.

123 124 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Liss Forest

125 126 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Liss Forest

EA104 Holly Wood, Liss Forest Liss Forest Liss Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. Potential impact on protected trees.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

127 128 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Liss Forest

EA104 Holly Wood, Liss High Sensitivity The site consists of a large garden No The owner of the Yes There is no Yes Development on the Forest Due to proximity to land to the west of two residential site has recently reason to indicate site would have a Longmoor Inclosure properties. The site is within an promoted the site why development potential adverse Special Protection Area area of woodland, which forms and indicated it is on the site is not impact on the (SPA) and Site of part of the former Longmoor available for achievable. character and Importance for Nature railway line, now a public right of development. appearance of the Conservation to way (Shipwrights' Way) and Local landscape. Potential western boundary. Nature Reserve. The entrance impact on protected Development of the and frontage to the site is set trees. whole site would be within a line of large trees and detrimental to hedgerow and there are mature landscape character of trees visible within the site from the railway line this location. The site is adjacent walkway. Eastern part to a Local Nature Reserve and of site which relates Site of Importance for Nature more to Forest Road is Conservation. It contains a slightly less sensitive number of protected trees, due to context of including a Tree Preservation surrounding residential Order area in the western third character, however of the site. SPA issues remain.

129 130 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Lower Farringdon

131 132 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Farringdon

EA017 Land at Farringdon Mill, Gosport Road Farringdon Farringdon Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site is not currently considered to be achievable. Loss of employment land.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

133 134 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Farringdon

EA017 Land at Farringdon Low Sensitivity The site is in use and it would Yes The site is in Yes There is currently No Development on the Mill, Gosport Road Due to Previously need to be demonstrated that the single ownership a shared access site is not currently Developed Land status loss of employment space was and the owner with the adjacent considered to be and size of existing acceptable. There may be has previously business park. It achievable. Loss of buildings potential for contamination due to indicated the site would need to be employment land. previous use. There are Tree would be available demonstrated Preservation Orders on an area of in the second five that a separate trees on the south west boundary year period. access could be of the site and along the southern achieved. There and south eastern boundary. The may be a problem site is within 250m of an Historic associated with Landfill Site. There is a public right compatibility of of way through the site. There is a uses and any grade II listed building opposite. development would need to be able to mitigate this through design and layout.

135 136 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Petersfield

137 138 139 140 141 142 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Petersfield

EA046 Land South of Larcombe Road, and West Petersfield Petersfield Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be of the Causeway previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

EA047 Land to the south of 115 Sussex Road Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA048 Land at Buckmore Stables Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA049 Petersfield Pay and Play Golf Course, Petersfield Petersfield Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be Sussex Road previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

143 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA050 Land at Penns Field Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 82 82 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA051 Land at Buckmore Farm Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 73 30 43 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA054 Land at Larcombe Road Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 60 60 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA055 Land South of Durford Road Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 48 48 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA057 Land in High Street, Dragon Street and St Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 19 0 0 19 Not Applicable. Peter's Road (Deliverable)

EA058 Land South East of the Causeway, Petersfield Petersfield Excluded 0 0 0 0 As of 1st April 2014, there is an Petersfield extant planning permission for residential development on the site which is listed in Appendix B and the dwellings are counted under the another element of supply.

EA059 Sites to the South and North of Durford Petersfield Petersfield Excluded 0 0 0 0 Duplicate of EA079. Road, Petersfield

144 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA061 Land south west of The Causeway Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA062 Land at the Causeway Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 136 0 136 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA063 Land West of Tilmore Road Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA065 Land west of Upper Tilmore Road Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

145 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA067 Penns Place Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 There is no evidence that the site is available or being actively promoted.

EA068 Land to the south of Sussex Road and Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would Russell Way (Option A) have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA069 Land at Causeway Farm (extended site Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would boundary) have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

See EA062

EA070 Land West of Bell Hill Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 28 0 28 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

146 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA071 Land South of Paddock Way Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA072 Land South of the Causeway Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA073 Land to the rear of the Causeway Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA074 Land to the west of the Causeway Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 64 64 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

147 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA075 Tews Engineering Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 Loss of employment land.

EA076 Buckmore Stables Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA077 Land East of Tilmore Road Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA079 Unit 1 and 2 the Domes, Durford Road, Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 Loss of employment land.

EA080 Land South of Sussex Road Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

148 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA081 Land East of Russell Way Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA082 Land South of Russell Way Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA083 Paris House, Frenchmans Road Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 Loss of employment land.

EA107 Land south of Sussex Road and Russell Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to Way (Option B) the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

149 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA108 Lower Tilmore, Tilmore Road Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 6 6 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA112 HCC Depot off Paddock Way Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 30 0 30 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA115 Community Centre, Love Lane Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 10 0 10 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA116 Land to North of Reservoir Lane Petersfield Petersfield Has Potential 11 0 11 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA118 Land adjacent to railway, off Borough Petersfield Petersfield Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would Road, have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the townscape.

Total by Settlement 567 290 258 19

150 151 152 Site Reference Area EA050 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Penns Field Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Recreation Ground

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium Sensitivity The site is in close proximity to Tilmore Brook and local cycle route. Sensitive Green Infrastructure based design would be needed to mitigate these effects.

Summary of Suitability Is the site There are a number of protected trees around the boundary of the site. It is abuts a Local Nature Reserve/ Site of suitable? Scientific Special Interest (SSSI) to the north, with a public right of way running along this boundary. The site is considered suitable for development subject to appropriate buffer is provided between development and the SSSI Yes to the north and existing protected trees are considered. There are important archaeological sites in the vicinity and archaeological considerations are likely. The site is within a Mineral Consultation Area.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available within the first five available? years. There is a planning application on this site which is pending consideration. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 3.7 22 82 82 0 0

153 154 Site Reference Area EA051 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Buckmore Farm Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Agricultural/grazing

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium/High Sensitivity Views from Butser Hill and high ground to the south. This could be addressed through careful design and mitigation to reduce the impact. Impacts on the public right of way. Existing tree retention and access.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is adjacent to the A3 and any development would need to ensure that development was not affected by suitable? excessive noise. A public right of way runs through the site. There are three grade II listed buildings adjacent to the south and a protected tree on the southern boundary. It is considered appropriate to focus development in the Yes north eastern field. The site is located within a Mineral Consultation Area.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available within the first ten available? years, depending on numbers being developed. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is A suitable access would need to be created from the south from Winchester Road through the adjacent development employment allocation or Beckham Lane (subject to improvements). It is suggested that this access could also serve on the site EA070. achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 2.3 28 73 30 43 0

155 156 Site Reference Area EA054 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Larcombe Road Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Agricultural/grazing

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium Sensitivity The site has valuable landscape features - the stream, woodland and public right of way, which would need to be well incorporated into development.

Summary of Suitability Is the site There are Tree Preservation Order areas and points which run through the centre of the site and within the suitable? eastern part of the site. The site is considered suitable for development on the western portion of the site which is designed to incorporate the existing landscape features of the site and connects with the potential site to the south Yes (EA074). The eastern part of the site is within flood zone 2 and 3.

Summary of Availability Is the site The owners have previously indicated the site would be available within the first five years. There is currently a pre- available? application enquiry on the site. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 3 20 60 60 0 0

157 158 Site Reference Area EA055 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land South of Durford Road Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Agricultural/grazing

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium Sensitivity Medium sensitivity due to screening function of trees for existing settlement edge. Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) priority habitat, Green Infrastructure asset and cultural heritage asset. Development brief essential.

Summary of Suitability Is the site There are protected trees on the northern boundary. There is a gas pipe line running beneath the site and some suitable? areas of surface water flood risk. The site is within a Mineral Consultation Area. The assessment in the Petersfield Neighbourhood Plan has identified that the site is ecologically sensitive and has indicated that parts of the site may Yes not be suitable for development. Therefore, given the potential constraints and the conclusions of the landscape assessment, the site is considered suitable for low density development. There are important archaeological sites in the vicinity and archaeological considerations are likely.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available within the first five available? years. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 3.2 15 48 48 0 0

159 160 Site Reference Area EA057 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land in High Street, Dragon Street and St Peter's Road Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Retail and Residential

Summary of Landscape Assessment Low landscape sensitivity but High Townscape Sensitivity

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is located within the existing settlement boundary in the town centre of Petersfield. The site is within the suitable? Conservation Area and there are two grade II listed buildings adjacent. Development on the site is subject to demonstrating that the exiting school can be relocated. The site is considered appropriate for high density Yes development, however this would need to be sensitively designed to respect the setting of the surrounding listed buildings and the character of the town centre. The site is within the historic core of the medieval town of Petersfield and it is likely that some archaeological issues will arise.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available within the first five available? years. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.27 70 19 0 0 19

161 162 Site Reference Area EA062 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at the Causeway Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Residential/garden and field

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium/High Sensitivity Medium/High Sensitivity in the western part of the site, this increases to High Sensitivity in the eastern section of the site beyond the northern edge of the mobile home park and in close proximity to the stream corridor and public right of way.

Summary of Suitability Is the site There is a public right of way (Hangers Way) running through the western part of the site. The site is adjacent to a suitable? Grade II listed building and there is a conservation area to the north. There are a number of Tree Preservation Order areas and points within the site. The northern part of the site (following the Stanbridge Stream) is within Yes Flood Zone 2 and 3. The northern corner of the site is around 35 metres from the edge of the Conservation Area. Given the conclusions of the landscape assessment and constraints on the site it is considered suitable to development the western part of the site, which is less sensitive in landscape terms and more related to the existing settlement pattern.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is currently available and has been actively promoted for development, including through a recent outline available? planning application. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is a relatively narrow and single access point to the site. The Draft Petersfield Neighbourhood Plan has development identified the requirement to incorporate multiple points of access from the B2070 and possibly Sussex Road. Issues on the site of ownership and highway restrictions would need to be overcome to achieve this. achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 12.6 25 136 0 136 0

163 164 Site Reference Area EA070 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land West of Bell Hill Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Grassland

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium sensitivity Sloping topography which elevates the site. Steep slope backing onto the settlement edge. Long thin site is inefficient. Higher area to north has intervisibility with Butser Hill. Would need to be carefully assessed.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The northern edge of site is elevated by 10-15m above southern part of field. There is a Tree Preservation Order suitable? adjacent to northern part of the site. The site is within a Mineral Consultation Area. The site is considered suitable subject to creating of an appropriate access and design. Yes

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available within the first five available? years. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is a suggestion that the main access to this site would be created from the south, either from Winchester development Road through the adjacent employment site or from Beckham Lane (subject to improvements). on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 1 28 28 0 28 0

165 166 Site Reference Area EA074 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land to the west of the Causeway Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Equestrian and County Council Depot

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium/High sensitivity Due to views, access issues and impacts on the countryside setting of the town and poor relationship to settlement pattern. Would need to be considered alongside Larcombe Road scheme, particular account access and the river/stream corridor and the public right of way.

Summary of Suitability Is the site There is a grade II listed building adjacent to the site. The western half of the site is within flood zones 2 and 3. suitable? There are Tree Preservation Orders along northern boundary. The site is within a Mineral Consultation Area. Yes

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available within the first five available? years. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 2.3 28 64 64 0 0

167 168 Site Reference Area EA108 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Lower Tilmore, Tilmore Road Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Submission Residential

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium Sensitivity The site has the potential to have a significant impact on the character of this rural part of Petersfield which is locally important. The site is previously developed land and as such is less sensitive, however it is unlikely that significant numbers could be achieved without causing significant harm to local character.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is bounded by mature hedgerows and there are several large mature trees within the site. The site is not suitable? well connected to the existing settlement, but it may be suitable for small scale redevelopment of the existing property. Yes

Summary of Availability Is the site The owners have indicated that the site is available immediately. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.6 10 6 6 0 0

169 170 Site Reference Area EA112 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement HCC Depot off Paddock Way Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Other County Council depot

Summary of Landscape Assessment Low Sensitivity The site is previously developed land, is consistent with surrounding residential land and continued within the settlement pattern.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is close to the A3 and is physically adjacent to the railway line. There is potential for contamination from suitable? existing uses. Subject to these constraints the site is considered suitable for development. Yes

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available within the first five available? years. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 1.2 25 30 0 30 0

171 172 Site Reference Area EA115 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Community Centre, Love Lane Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Other Community Use

Summary of Landscape Assessment Low Sensitivity The site is PDL, consistent with surrounding residential land and contained within the settlement pattern. Alternative land needed for use to continue.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is previously developed land and is considered suitable for redevelopment. This is subject to the existing suitable? community use being provided at an alternative and appropriate location in the town. Yes

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is available for development, subject to the existing community use being provided at an alternative and available? appropriate location in the town.

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.2 50 10 0 10 0

173 174 Site Reference Area EA116 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land to North of Reservoir Lane Petersfield

Parish Petersfield

Source Current Use Other Agricultural/Grazing

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium/High Sensitivity The site is in an increasingly rural location on the Shipwrights Way, large scale development would have a significant detrimental impact on local character.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is within 250m of an Historic Landfill Site. There is a grade II listed building to the south. The site is on the suitable? northern edge of the settlement and any development of the site would need to be small scale and in keeping with the existing low density and rural character of the surrounding development. Therefore the site is only considered Yes appropriate for a small number of dwellings.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site has been actively promoted through the Petersfield Neighbourhood Plan. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 1.42 8 11 0 11 0

175 176 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Petersfield

EA047 Land to the south High sensitivity The site is partly within the No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not of 115 Sussex Road Due to intervisibility settlement policy boundary and single ownership reason to indicate relate well to the with wider countryside partly outside. Access would be and the owner why development existing settlement to south and south achieved through demolition of has previously on the site is not pattern and east. Rear garden 115 Sussex Road and relocation. indicated the site achievable. development on the development which There are protected trees in the would be available site would have a would disrupt the north eastern corner of the site. within the first potential adverse linear ribbon The site is located within 5km of a five years. impact on the development along Special Protection Area. character and Sussex Road. Setting of appearance of the Heath and new access landscape. affecting local views.

EA048 Land at Buckmore High Sensitivity The site is close to the A3 and is No The site is in Yes The existing Yes The site does not Stables Owing to access subject to noise disturbance. single ownership access is via an relate well to the problems, location There a public right of way along and the owner unmade track and existing settlement remote from town, the southern boundary. The site is has previously would require pattern and inconsistent with within 250m of a Historic Landfill indicated the site improvements. development on the existing dispersed site. The site is within a Mineral would be available site would have a settlement edge and Consultation Area. It is not within the first potential adverse proximity to A3 considered to be well related to five years. impact on the corridor. the existing pattern and character and development would change the appearance of the existing robust settlement edge. landscape. Due to this and the conclusions of the landscape assessment, the site is not considered to be suitable for development.

EA061 Land south west of High Sensitivity There are protected trees along No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not The Causeway The site is unrelated to the eastern boundary. The eastern single ownership reason to indicate relate well to the the settlement, access part of the site is within flood and the owner why development existing settlement would be detrimental zone 2 and 3. There is a public has previously on the site is not pattern and 177 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA061 Land south west of to landscape character right of way running through the No indicated the site Yes achievable. Yes development on the The Causeway and/or is dependant on site. The site is within a Mineral would be available site would have a other land being Consultation Area. Due to the within the first potential adverse developed, and the site conclusions of the landscape five years. impact on the is visible in long assessment the site is not character and distance views beyond considered suitable for appearance of the the settlement itself development. landscape. and would appear unrelated as a result.

EA063 Land West of High Sensitivity The site is poorly connected to No The site is in Yes A safe and Yes The site does not Tilmore Road Due size of site and the settlement pattern and is single ownership appropriate relate well to the dominating influence connected along a small section of and the owner access would existing settlement this would have on a the southern boundary. Tilmore has previously need to be pattern and wide area including a Brook runs along the floor of the indicated the site achieved. There development on the long section of the valley and is one of the main would be available are no other site would have a Hangers Way along streams which runs through within the first reasons to potential adverse Tilmore Road and Petersfield to the Rother. The five years. indicate why impact on the beyond up to where northern part of the site is development on character and the route crosses the adjacent to the A3. There are the site could not appearance of the A3. protected trees on the south be achieved. landscape. eastern boundary of the site. The site is within 250m of an Historic Landfill Site.

EA065 Land west of High Sensitivity The site is not physically adjacent No The site has been Yes A safe and Yes The site does not Upper Tilmore Proximity to Hangers to the settlement policy boundary jointly submitted appropriate relate well to the Road Way and poor and does not relate well to the by the owners of access would existing settlement relationship with existing settlement pattern. The the site and they need to be pattern and settlement pattern Hangers Way (public right of way) have indicated the achieved. There development on the causing significant runs through the northern part of site would be are no other site would have a landscape impact. the site and along the western available within reasons to potential adverse boundary. The site is within 250m the first five years. indicate why impact on the of an Historic Landfill Site. Due to development on character and the conclusions of the landscape the site could not appearance of the 178 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA065 Land west of assessment the site is not No Yes be achieved. Yes landscape. Upper Tilmore considered suitable for Road development.

EA067 Penns Place Medium Sensitivity The site is currently in use as Yes There is no No There is no Yes There is no evidence Existing use and access offices, located within a recreation evidence that the reason to indicate that the site is available to countryside features. ground and adjacent to a Leisure site is available or why development or being actively Large site in the centre Centre and Rugby Club. A being actively on the site is not promoted. of open sports fields. footpath runs through the site. promoted. achievable. Existing use reduces sensitivity to alternative use. Careful design required owing to isolated nature of site.

EA068 Land to the south Medium/High There is a grade II listed building No The site has two Yes A safe and suitable Yes Development on the of Sussex Road Sensitivity adjacent to the site. The site is owners. The site access point site would have a and Russell Way Intervisibility with within a Mineral Consultation has been would need to be potential adverse (Option A) wider countryside to Area. submitted jointly achieved. There impact on the south and south east. and the owners are no other character and Access close to Heath have previously reasons to appearance of the Pond & likely to require indicated that the indicate why landscape. highway improvements site would be development on (e.g. pavements). available in the the site could not Southern boundary is first 5 years. be achieved. open to surrounding landscape

EA069 Land at Causeway Medium/High Sensitivity This site covers the site area No The site is Yes There is a Yes Development on the Farm (extended Medium/high sensitivity submitted under site reference currently available relatively narrow site would have a site boundary) in the western part of EA062, with an extended area to and has been and single access potential adverse the site, this increases the east. Given the conclusions of actively promoted point to the site. impact on the to high sensitivity in the the landscape assessment, for development, The Draft character and eastern section of the development on this part of the including through Petersfield appearance of the site beyond the site is not considered to suitable. a recent outline Neighbourhood landscape. 179 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA069 Land at Causeway northern edge of the No planning Yes Plan has identified Yes Farm (extended mobile home park and application. the requirement See EA062 site boundary) in close proximity to to incorporate the stream corridor multiple points of and public right of way. access from the B2070 and possibly Sussex Road. Issues of ownership and highway restrictions would need to be overcome to achieve this.

EA071 Land South of High Sensitivity Due to the conclusions of the No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not Paddock Way Due to exposure and landscape assessment the site is single ownership reason to indicate relate well to the intervisibility with not considered suitable for and the owner why development existing settlement Butser Hill to the south. development. Adjacent to the has previously on the site is not pattern and railway line and A3. There is a indicated the site achievable. development on the footpath running along the eastern would be available site would have a boundary. The south eastern within the first potential adverse corner of the site is within flood five years. impact on the zone 2 and 3. The site is within a character and Mineral Consultation Area. appearance of the landscape.

EA072 Land South of the Medium/High sensitivity There is a footpath running No The site is being Yes There is no Yes The site does not Causeway Due to views, impact of through the site. There are Tree promoted by reason to indicate relate well to the access and prominence Preservation Orders around the prospective why development existing settlement of site. Impacts on the boundary of the site. The purchasers and on the site is not pattern and countryside setting of northern edge of the site is within they have achievable. development on the the town and poor flood zone 2 and 3. The site is indicated that the site would have a relationship to within a Mineral Consultation site would be potential adverse 180 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA072 Land South of the settlement pattern. Area. No available in the Yes Yes impact on the Causeway first five years. character and appearance of the landscape.

EA073 Land to the rear of High Sensitivity The majority of the site is within No The site is being Yes There is no Yes The site does not the Causeway Due to intervisibility flood zone 2 and 3. There is a promoted by reason to indicate relate well to the with Butser Hill to the grade II listed building adjacent. prospective why development existing settlement south and poor There is a footpath running purchasers and on the site is not pattern and relationship with through the site. The site is within they have achievable. development on the settlement pattern. a Mineral Consultation Area. indicated that the site would have a Proximity to A3 site would be potential adverse corridor. available in the impact on the first five years. character and appearance of the landscape.

EA075 Tews Engineering Low landscape The northern part of the site is No The site is in Yes There is no Yes Loss of employment sensitivity but high within the conservation area. The single ownership reason to indicate land. townscape sensitivity site is currently safeguarded for and the owner why development employment use by the East has previously on the site is not Hampshire Joint Core Strategy indicated the site achievable. and any alternative use will only would be available be permitted where it can be within the first demonstrated that it is no longer five years. suitable for employment use. The site has also been identified as an employment allocation in the draft Petersfield Neighbourhood Plan.

181 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA076 Buckmore Stables High Sensitivity The site is close to the A3 and is No The site is in Yes The existing Yes The site does not High sensitivity owing subject to noise disturbance. single ownership access is via an relate well to the to access problems, There is a public right of way and the owner unmade track and existing settlement location remote from along the western boundary. The has previously would require pattern and town, inconsistent with site is within 250m of an Historic indicated the site improvements. development on the existing dispersed Landfill Site. It is not considered would be available site would have a settlement edge and to be well related to the existing within the first potential adverse proximity to A3 pattern and development would five years. impact on the corridor. change the existing robust character and settlement edge. Due to this and appearance of the the conclusions of the landscape landscape. assessment, the site is not considered to be suitable for development.

EA077 Land East of Medium/High Sensitivity There are Tree Preservation No The site is in Yes There is no Yes Development on the Tilmore Road Due to the importance Orders along the north-eastern single ownership reason to indicate site would have a of the Tilmore Brook boundary and in centre of site. and the owner why development potential adverse as a GI corridor into The Hangers Way (public right of has previously on the site is not impact on the Petersfield. Land is used way) runs along south western indicated the site achievable. character and for smallholding. boundary. Tilmore Brook runs would be available appearance of the through the site and is one of the within the first landscape. main streams which runs through five years. Petersfield to the Rother. Improvements to access are likely to be detrimental to rural character of Tilmore Road. Given this and the conclusions of the landscape assessment the site is not considered suitable for development.

EA079 Unit 1 and 2 the Low/Medium Sensitivity The site has an existing business No The site is in Yes There is no Yes Loss of employment Domes, Durford Due to surrounding use. There are Tree Preservation single ownership reason to indicate land. Road, trees and brownfield Order areas along the northern and the owner why development condition. Good and southern boundaries of the has previously on the site is not

relationship with site and a TPO on the western 182 indicated the site achievable. Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA079 Unit 1 and 2 the Durford Road. Careful edge. The site is within a Mineral No would be available Yes Yes Domes, Durford impact assessment of Consultation Area. The site is within the first Road, any tree removal currently safeguarded for five years. required. Green employment use by the East Infrastructure Hampshire Joint Core Strategy opportunities for and any alternative use will only connectivity via Serpent be permitted where it can be Trail demonstrated that it is no longer suitable for employment use. The site has also been identified as an employment allocation in the draft Petersfield Neighbourhood Plan.

EA080 Land South of High Sensitivity There is a Tree Preservation No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not Sussex Road Key views of chalk Order area on the northern single ownership reason to indicate relate well to the ridge from Sussex boundary of the site. The site is and the owner why development existing settlement Road. Historic physically adjacent to the has previously on the site is not pattern and relationship with Heath conservation area and in close indicated the site achievable. development on the Common and proximity to a Site of Special would be available site would have a surrounding field Scientific Interest (SSSI). The site within the first potential adverse pattern. is within a Mineral Consultation five years. There impact on the Area. Based on the conclusions of have been recent character and the landscape assessment, the site planning appearance of the is not considered suitable for application for landscape. development. residential development on the site.

EA081 Land East of High Sensitivity There are Tree Preservation No The site is in Yes There is no Yes The site does not Russell Way Prominent site, edge of Orders on the boundary and single ownership reason to indicate relate well to the town, setting of listed within the site. There is a grade II and the owner why development existing settlement building and key listed building adjacent. The site is has previously on the site is not pattern and historic/cultural open within a Mineral Consultation indicated the site achievable. development on the space. Visually sensitive. Area. There is a Site of Nature would be available site would have a Conservation Interest (SINC) within the first potential adverse adjacent to the site (to the north). five years. impact on the 183 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA081 Land East of Due to the conclusions of the No Yes Yes character and Russell Way landscape assessment, the site is appearance of the not considered suitable for landscape. development.

EA082 Land South of High Sensitivity There is a grade II listed building No The site has two Yes A safe and suitable Yes The site does not Russell Way Due to poor adjacent to the site. The site is owners. The site access point relate well to the relationship with within a Mineral Consultation has been would need to be existing settlement settlement pattern in a Area. submitted jointly achieved. There pattern and sensitive assart and the owners are no other development on the fieldscape on the rural have previously reasons to site would have a edge of Petersfield. indicated that the indicate why potential adverse site would be development on impact on the available in the the site could not character and first 5 years. be achieved. appearance of the landscape.

EA083 Paris House, Low landscape The site has an existing business No The site is in Yes There is no Yes Loss of employment Frenchmans Road sensitivity but high use. A large proportion of the site single ownership reason to indicate land. townscape sensitivity is within flood zone 2 and parts to and the owner why development the north and east within flood has previously on the site is not zone 3. The site is currently indicated the site achievable. safeguarded for employment use would be available by the East Hampshire Joint Core within the first Strategy and any alternative use five years. There will only be permitted where it has been a recent can be demonstrated that it is no planning longer suitable for employment application for use. The site has also been residential identified as an employment development. allocation in the draft Petersfield 184 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA083 Paris House, Frenc Neighbourhood Plan. No Yes Yes

EA107 Land south of Medium/High Sensitivity There is a grade II listed building No The site has two Yes A safe and suitable Yes The site does not Sussex Road and Medium/high sensitivity adjacent to the site. The site is owners. The site access point relate well to the Russell Way due to poor within a Mineral Consultation has been would need to be existing settlement (Option B) relationship with Area. submitted jointly achieved. There pattern and settlement pattern in a and the owners are no other development on the sensitive assart have previously reasons to site would have a fieldscape on the rural indicated that the indicate why potential adverse edge of Petersfield. site would be development on impact on the available in the the site could not character and first 5 years. be achieved. appearance of the landscape.

EA118 Land adjacent to Medium Sensitivity There is a Tree Preservation No The site is Yes There is no Yes Development on the railway, off Medium Landscape Order Area and a protected tree considered to be reason to indicate site would have a Borough Road, Sensitivity due to within the site. The site is within a available for why development potential adverse access problems and Mineral Consultation Area. Due development and on the site is not impact on the relationship with to the conclusions of the has recently been achievable. character and adjacent recreational landscape assessment the site is submitted appearance of the ground - Medium -High not considered suitable for townscape. townscape sensitivity development. due to access issues and potential to detrimentally affect the Borough Hill recreation ground.

185 186 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Selborne

187 188 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Selborne

EA085 Land to the rear of Ketchers Field, Selborne Selborne Has Potential 8 8 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA087 Land at Burlands, Selborne Road Selborne Selborne Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on heritage assets.

EA088 Land under the Hill Selborne Selborne Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on heritage assets.

EA089 Land South of Everly Corner, Firgrove Selborne Selborne Excluded 0 0 0 0 Within 400m SPA - biodiversity Road impact.

189 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA111 Land at Honey Lane, Selborne Selborne Rejected 0 0 0 0 Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. Development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on heritage assets.

Total by Settlement 8 8 0 0

190 191 192 Site Reference Area EA085 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land to the rear of Ketchers Field, Selborne

Parish Selborne

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Agricultural

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium/High sensitivity The site is located on an existing public right of way within the National Park. The site is not large scale and has buildings on it. It is located on the outer edge of existing development in a highly sensitive location. Existing screening may not be adequate to mitigate for potential effect.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site is within 5km of Special Protection Area. Due to the conclusions of the landscape assessment, the site is suitable? considered suitable for a small number of units. Yes

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available within the first five available? years. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is Improvements would be required to the access. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.2 40 8 8 0 0

193 194 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Selborne

EA087 Land at Burlands, High Sensitivity The site abuts the conservation No The site is in Yes There is no Yes Development on the Selborne Road High sensitivity due to area on the southern and south single ownership reason to indicate site would have a access, existing views western boundaries and there is a and the owner why development potential adverse and impacts on public grade II listed building adjacent to has previously on the site is not impact on the right of way network the south west (The Grange). indicated the site achievable. character and There are power lines crossing would be available appearance of the the site. There is a public right of within the first landscape. way through the southern part of five years. Development on the the site. The site is within 5km of site would have a a Special Protection Area. Due to potential adverse the conclusions of the landscape impact on heritage assessment, the site is not assets. considered suitable for development.

EA088 Land under the High Sensitivity The site is located within the No The site is in Yes An appropriate Yes Development on the Hill High sensitivity due to Selborne Conservation Area, is single ownership and safe access to site would have a access, existing views physically adjacent to a grade II and the owner site would need potential adverse and impacts on public listed building and in close has previously to be achieved. impact on the right of way network proximity to a grade II* registered indicated the site There are no character and parkscape. The Hanger Way would be available other reasons appearance of the (public right of way) passes along within the first why development landscape. the northern boundary of the site. five years. on the site could Development on the Due to the potential impact on not be achieved. site would have a the historic character of potential adverse Selbourne and the conclusions of impact on heritage the landscape assessment (above), assets. the site is not considered suitable for development. The site is within 5km of a Special Protection Area.

EA111 Land at Honey High Sensitivity There is a small part of the site No The site is in Yes A safe and Yes Development on the Lane, Due to access, size, within the Conservation Area. single ownership appropriate site would have a 195 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA111 Land at Honey scale and location of The site is a large field which rises No and the owner Yes access point from Yes potential adverse Lane, site, existing views and opposite side of the village to the has previously Honey Lane impact on the impacts on public right Hanger. The site is within 5km of indicated the site would need to be character and of way network the Special Protection Area. Due would be available achieved. There appearance of the to the potential impact on the within the first are potential landscape. setting of the Conservation Area five years. issues associate Development on the and the settlement, the impact of with this access site would have a creating an access and conclusions point and potential adverse of the landscape assessment, the increased use of impact on heritage site is not considered to be junction onto assets. suitable for development. High Street.

196 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Sheet

197 198 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Sheet

EA052 Land at Broadlands Meadow, Town Lane Sheet Sheet Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. Development on the site is not currently considered to be achievable.

EA053 Land at Kingsfernsden Lane, Sheet Sheet Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. Development on the site is not currently considered to be achievable.

EA056 Land adjacent to Wymering, Midhurst Sheet Sheet Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be Road previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

199 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

EA060 Land South of Sanlea, Midhurst Road Sheet Sheet Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

EA064 Land off Waterworks Road Sheet Sheet Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

EA066 Land East of Mill Lane Sheet Sheet Excluded 0 0 0 0 Flood risk

EA078 Land East of Pullens Lane Sheet Sheet Has Potential 6 6 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA091 Land at Farnham Road, Sheet Sheet Has Potential 15 15 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA095 Twenty Acres, Westmark Sheet Steep Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

Total by Settlement 21 21 0 0

200 201 202 Site Reference Area EA078 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land East of Pullens Lane Sheet

Parish Sheet

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Agricultural buildings and paddock

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium/High sensitivity High sensitivity to development (depending on scale owing to location on the valley floor adjacent to the river). Brownfield condition reduces this to medium sensitivity, although suggest that the site could support only limited and sensitively designed development. Some associated green infrastructure improvements could be very beneficial for connectivity along the river.

Summary of Suitability Is the site Part of the site is previously developed land. The eastern edge of the site is within flood zone 2 and 3 and the site is suitable? adjacent to a Site of Nature Conservation Interest (SINC). The site is within a Mineral Consultation Area. Given the conclusions of the landscape assessment, the site is considered suitable for a small number of dwellings focused on Yes the redevelopment of the existing buildings on the site, sensitively designed and subject to improvements to the existing access.

Summary of Availability Is the site The owners of the site have previously indicated the site would be available within the first five years. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is The existing access is via a narrow unmade track and would require improvements. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 1 6 6 6 0 0

203 204 Site Reference Area EA091 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Farnham Road, Sheet

Parish Sheet

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council Agricultural/grazing

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium Sensitivity The site has medium landscape sensitivity due to its enclosed nature. The existing stream and existing trees are notable character features which are sensitive to development particularly on the sloping topography where gradients would need to be altered. Views from adjoining residential properties. Site capacity may be limited.

Summary of Suitability Is the site The site slopes downward from north to south. It is adjacent to the railway line and potential noise disturbance suitable? would need to be considered. There are a number of trees protected by Tree Preservation Orders around the edge of the site. A small part of site, along the north eastern boundary, is within flood zone 2 and 3. Yes

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and is being actively promoted. available? Yes

Summary of Achievability Is The changing land levels will need to be taken into account. There are no other reasons to indicate why development development on the site is not achievable. on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 0.75 15 15 0 0

205 206 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Sheet

EA052 Land at Broadlands High Sensitivity The site is surrounded by mature No The site is in Yes It is expected that No The site does not Meadow, Town Due to levels, existing tree belts and hedgerows around single ownership significant works relate well to the Lane trees, sensitivity of the its boundaries. Due to its raised and the owner would be required existing settlement settlement pattern and position it is a prominent site and has previously to achieve access. pattern and intact field pattern. does not relate well to the indicated the site development on the surrounding settlement pattern. would be available site would have a Therefore, it is not considered within the first potential adverse suitable for development. five years. impact on the character and appearance of the landscape. Development on the site is not currently considered to be achievable.

EA053 Land at Medium/High sensitivity There are a number of protected No The site is in Yes Access would No The site does not Kingsfernsden Due to access issues trees along the southern single ownership need to be relate well to the Lane, and impacts on rural boundary and within the site. The and the owner created from existing settlement hinterland of Petersfield north eastern corner of the site is has previously Kingsfersden pattern and at an important covered by a Tree Preservation indicated the site Lane, which is a development on the gateway location. Order area. The site is rural in would be available narrow and rural site would have a character and given the within the first lane. This is likely potential adverse conclusions of the landscape five years. to impact on the impact on the assessment, the site is not rural and narrow character and considered suitable for character of appearance of the development. Kingsfersden Lane. landscape. Development on the site is not currently considered to be achievable. 207 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability EA053 Land at No Yes No Kingsfernsden Lane,

208 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Steep

209 210 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Steep

EA094 Land east of Hays Cottages Steep Steep Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

211 212 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Steep

EA094 Land east of Hays High Sensitivity The site sits on the head of a dry No The site is in Yes The proposed Yes The site does not Cottages Exposed to views in valley on land which slopes away single ownership access point is relate well to the local beauty spot and from the settlement and is highly and the owner onto a narrow existing settlement poorly related to visible. It is not well related to the has previously lane. It would pattern and settlement pattern existing settlement. Given this and indicated the site need to be development on the sensitive historic the conclusions of the landscape would be available demonstrated site would have a fieldscape pattern. assessment, the site is not within the first that a safe access potential adverse considered suitable for five years. point could be impact on the development. The site is located created. character and within a Mineral Consultation appearance of the Area. landscape.

213 214 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Stroud

215 216 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Stroud

EA096 Land at 44a Winchester Road Stroud Stroud Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more additional homes.

EA097 Land at Ramsdean Road, Stroud Stroud Has Potential 30 30 0 0 Not Applicable. (Deliverable)

EA098 Land at Myrtle Farm, Stroud Stroud Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered suitable to yield 5 or more homes.

EA099 Land adjacent no 1 Springvale ridge. Stroud Steep Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

EA103 Land adjacent to Holmwood Lane Stroud Stroud Rejected 0 0 0 0 The site does not relate well to the existing settlement pattern and development on the site would have a potential adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape.

EA105 5 Ramsdean Road Stroud Stroud Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered suitable to yield or more additional homes.

Total217 by Settlement 30 30 0 0 218 Site Reference Area EA097 East Hampshire

Site Address Settlement Land at Ramsdean Road, Stroud

Parish Stroud

Source Current Use Previously assessed by Borough/District Council

Summary of Landscape Assessment Medium sensitivity The site is in a prominent location within the settlement and is adjacent to an SINC and existing watercourse.

Summary of Suitability Is the site There are areas to the north of the site where there is risk of surface water flooding. There is a Site of Importance suitable? for Nature Conservation (SINC) to the east of the site. The site relates well to the existing settlement pattern, but as the landscape assessment concludes it is in a prominent location. It is considered suitable to focus development Yes along the Ramsdean Road and towards the south of the site, relating to the residential properties to the south, avoiding the existing watercourse and area of the site susceptible to surface water flooding and providing a buffer to the adjacent SINC. The site is close to a Schedule Ancient Monument.

Summary of Availability Is the site The site is in single ownership and the owner has previously indicated the site would be available within the first five available? years. Yes

Summary of Achievability Is There is no reason to indicate why development on the site is not achievable. development on the site achievable? Yes

Assessment Recommendation Has Potential (Deliverable)

Reason for Rejection Not Applicable.

Site Area (Ha) Site Density (dph) Estimated Yield 0-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 1 30 30 30 0 0

219 220 Site Site Address Summary of Landscape Summary of Suitability Suitable Summary of Available Summary of Achievable Reason for Rejection Ref Assessment Availability Acheivability Settlement Stroud

EA096 Land at 44a Medium Sensitivity The site is adjacent to a Scheduled No The site is in Yes There are Yes The site is not Winchester Road The site is sensitive to Ancient Monument to south of single ownership concerns considered suitable to change owing to its site. It currently consists of a and the owner regarding the yield 5 or more wooded character and residential property which fronts has previously access onto the additional homes. exposed location. onto Winchester Road (A272) indicated the site A272. There are Access likely to be and residential gardens to the would be available no other reasons problematic. south. The gardens are heavily within the first to indicate why Settlement expansion wooded and the loss of trees is five years. development onto the A272 is not considered acceptable. could not be undesirable. Proximity Therefore, the site is not achieved. to Scheduled Ancient considered suitable for more than Monument. 5 dwellings. The site is located within a Mineral Consultation Area.

EA103 Land adjacent to High Sensitivity The site is on the southern edge No The site is in Yes It would need to Yes The site does not Holmwood Lane Due to location outside of the village, slopes towards the single ownership be demonstrated relate well to the settlement and south and the chalk ridge, and the owner that at safe and existing settlement sensitive to changes in exposing it to views and visibility has previously reasonable access pattern and the views to and from towards the south. It is not well indicated the site could be achieved. development on the the site. related to the existing settlement would be available There are no site would have a pattern. Improvements to access within the first other reasons to potential adverse along the unmade track to the five years indicate why impact on the north are likely to be detrimental development on character and to users of the public right of way the site could not appearance of the and the character of the area. be achieved. landscape. Therefore, the site is not considered suitable for development.

221 222 South Downs National Park

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2014

Appendix D(v) - East Hampshire

Site Assessments by Settlement

Upper Farringdon

223 224 Site Ref Site Address Settlement Parish Recommendation Total 0-5 6-10 11-15 Rejected/Excluded Reason Yield Years Years Years

Settlement Upper Farringdon

EA122 Field adjoining Maplecombe, The Street Upper Farringdon Farringdon Excluded 0 0 0 0 The site is not considered to be previously developed land, is outside a settlement and is detached and unrelated to that settlement.

Total by Settlement 0 0 0 0

225