Joint Core Strategy Revised Housing Numbers Habitats Regulations Assessment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy Revised Housing Numbers Habitats Regulations Assessment – Appropriate Assessment report July 2013 Prepared for East Hampshire District East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy – Preferred Housing Option Habitats Regulations Assessment Revision Schedule Habitat Regulations Assessment Report July 2013 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 29/07/13 Draft for JR AD JR consultation Principal Ecologist Senior ecologist Principal ecologist URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Scott House Alencon Link Basingstoke RG21 7PP Tel: 01256 310200 Fax: 01256 310201 www.urscorp.com East Hampshire District East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy – Preferred Housing Option Habitats Regulations Assessment Limitations URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of East Hampshire District Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client not relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by URS in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between January 2013 and July 2013 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. URS disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to URS’ attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. URS specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. Copyright © This Report is the copyright of URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. Habitat Regulations Assessment Report July 2013 1 East Hampshire District East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy – Preferred Housing Option Habitats Regulations Assessment Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 This report ...................................................................................................................... 4 2 Methodology.................................................................................... 6 2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 A Proportionate Assessment .......................................................................................... 6 2.3 The Process of HRA....................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Stage One: Likely Significant Effect Test (Screening)..................................................... 8 2.5 Stage Two: Appropriate Assessment.............................................................................. 9 2.6 Physical scope of the HRA ............................................................................................. 9 2.7 The ‘in combination’ scope ........................................................................................... 11 3 Pathways of Impact....................................................................... 12 3.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Urbanisation/ Urban edge impacts................................................................................ 12 3.3 Recreational pressure................................................................................................... 13 3.4 Atmospheric pollution ................................................................................................... 18 3.5 Water resources ........................................................................................................... 21 3.6 Water quality................................................................................................................. 22 4 East Hampshire Hangers SAC...................................................... 24 4.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 24 4.2 Reasons for Designation............................................................................................... 25 4.3 Historic Trends and Current Pressures......................................................................... 25 4.4 Effects of the Joint Core Strategy ................................................................................. 26 4.5 Conclusion.................................................................................................................... 30 5 Shortheath Common SAC ............................................................ 31 5.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 31 5.2 Reasons for Designation............................................................................................... 31 5.3 Historic Trends and Current Pressures......................................................................... 31 5.4 Effects of the Joint Core Strategy ................................................................................. 32 5.5 Conclusion.................................................................................................................... 35 6 Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA and Woolmer Forest SAC .......... 36 6.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 36 6.2 Reasons for Designation............................................................................................... 36 6.3 Historic Trends and Current Pressures......................................................................... 37 6.4 Effects of the Joint Core Strategy ................................................................................. 39 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report July 2013 2 East Hampshire District East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy – Preferred Housing Option Habitats Regulations Assessment 6.5 Conclusion.................................................................................................................... 48 7 Butser Hill SAC.............................................................................. 49 7.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 49 7.2 Reasons for Designation............................................................................................... 49 7.3 Historic Trends and Current Pressures......................................................................... 49 7.4 Effects of the Joint Core Strategy ................................................................................. 49 7.5 Conclusion.................................................................................................................... 52 8 Thursley, Hankley & Frensham Commons (Wealden Heaths Phase 1) SPA, Thursley, Ash, Pirbright & Chobham SAC and Thursley & Ockley Bogs Ramsar site ......... 53 8.1 Introduction................................................................................................................... 53 8.2 Reasons for Designation............................................................................................... 53 8.3 Historic Trends and Current Pressures......................................................................... 54 8.4 Effects of the Joint Core Strategy ................................................................................. 55 8.5 Conclusion.................................................................................................................... 60 9 Solent European Sites .................................................................