Hansard 33 1..154

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hansard 33 1..154 CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 137 Ï NUMBER 109 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, November 5, 2001 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 6901 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, November 5, 2001 The House met at 11 a.m. On December 9, 1997, the chair of the RCMP public complaints commission launched an investigation into these complaints. Following that investigation, a panel made up of three members Prayers was established on February 20, 1998, to hear the complaints. The hearings began on April 14, 1998 and ended in December of the same year, following the resignation of its members. PRIVATE MEMBERS BUSINESS On December 21, former justice Ted Hughes was appointed Ï (1105) interim commissioner to head an inquiry, which ended in the presentation on July 31 of an interim report of 453 pages plus [Translation] appendices. INDEPENDENCE OF THE RCMP I must criticize the fact that, three months after its release, the Ms. Pierrette Venne (Saint-BrunoSaint-Hubert, BQ) moved: report is still unavailable in French. Once again the government is That, in the opinion of this House, the government should, pursuant to failing to comply with its own laws. recommendation 31.3.1 of the interim report of the RCMP Public Complaints Commission on the events that took place during the APEC conference, set out in Since the production of the report, apart from the fact that the writing the nature and scope of the RCMP's independence in its relations with the RCMP, through Commissioner Zaccardelli, has publicly admitted its government. responsibility, the Hughes report has practically fallen into oblivion. She said: Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to begin this hour of debate on The terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11 Motion No. 391, which I presented. have certainly not helped. However they must not serve as a pretext for the government to avoid matters that might embarrass it. While the September 11 events did have a significant impact on the business of the House since the reopening of parliament, the fact Given the excessive powers that could be given to the police remains that even if certain issues have lost some of their priority, under the bill, it is all the more important to set out the nature of the they remain as important as they were before September 11. relations between the RCMP and the government, if it is to avoid finding itself in hot water once again. All the questions relating to interference by the Prime Minister's entourage in RCMP operations during the APEC conference are In addition, it is useful to point out that the RCMP's mea culpa among these issues. First, since the events that triggered the motion was expressed four years after the events in question, and the before us occurred over four years ago, I will briefly review the facts. recognition of its errors has cost the taxpayers nearly $10 million. From November 19 to November 25, 1997, the city of Vancouver The point of this motion is therefore to provide for the codification hosted the APEC conference. During that event, which was attended of police independence in order to set standards for the RCMP's by officials from various regions of Asia, the RCMP was the police relations with the government. force responsible for security. That essentially meant ensuring the security of 75 persons, including 12 who required a maximum level Despite the fact that this motion will likely never be acted on, for of protection. reasons I will explain later, we hope that it will, at least, ensure that the report does not end up forgotten on a shelf under a pile of dust, During the last day of the summit, when conference participants something that is too often the case for reports criticizing the were at a retreat at the Museum of Anthropology, located on the activities of the government. campus of the University of British Columbia, students and others voiced their opposition to the political systems of certain APEC To get right to the heart of the matter, let us start with subsection 5 members. (1) of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act, which provides, and I quote: The events that followed and involved protesters and RCMP officers resulted in the filing of 52 formal complaints against the The Governor in Council may appoint an officer, to be known as the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, who, under the direction of actions of these officers. These 52 complaints were grouped into 17 the Minister, has the control and management of the Force and all matters connected categories reflecting as many situations and events. therewith. 6902 COMMONS DEBATES November 5, 2001 Private Members Business We see immediately from this that the RCMP is not totally Conversely, the situation would be just as bad if we gave carte independent from the government. Despite the legislative power the blanche to the RCMP without requiring it to be accountable. In this solicitor general retains over the force, the RCMP in fact enjoys case, we are talking about the state exercising control, not influence, substantial independence under common law. as was the case with APEC. No matter how we look at it, it is both Ï (1110) inevitable and necessary that the state and the RCMP maintain some sort of link. At this point, what appears at first to constitute a conflict with the principle of independence does not in actual fact cause a problem. If we consider all of this as it applies specifically to the APEC On the one hand, unless it should become a private police force, events, clearly, the government's intervention, or rather, interference which is most certainly not what we want, the RCMP cannot exist according to the Hughes report, was inappropriate. Obviously the independently of a connection with the government. Hence the RCMP was not present in Vancouver as a part of its mandate to fight necessity that it be under the auspices of a department, in this case crime. Its mandate was limited to providing security for an the department of the solicitor general. international events. In order to carry out this mandate, it had to work in close co-operation with government officials. However, this As Commissioner Hughes states in his report, even if the nature co-operation should have been based on security considerations, and scope of the independence of the RCMP has no clearly defined rather than political interests. Unfortunately, we now know that this basis in legislation, the existence of that independence is acknowl- was not the case. We now know that the problem with the edged. In a supreme court judgment, Regina v Campbell, it was involvement of the RCMP at the conference occurred at two levels. clearly established that, when its actions are aimed at enforcing the law or carried out within the framework of a criminal investigation, the RCMP is generally totally independent of the executive power. First, as Commissioner Hughes points out, the performance of the RCMP was noteworthy for its glaring lack of professionalism and In this connection, the following is an excerpt from Justice standards of acceptable competencies. Binnie's decision: While for certain purposes the Commissioner of the RCMP reports to the Solicitor Ï (1115) General, the Commissioner is not to be considered a servant or agent of the government while engaged in a criminal investigation. The Commissioner is not He felt that there were two reasons for this: a failure to co-ordinate subject to political direction. Like every other police officer similarly engaged, he is answerable to the law and, no doubt, to his conscience. planning and operations, and an inability to anticipate events. As far as the law is concerned, we agree with the judge. As far as In addition, in his final remarks, he mentioned that the conduct of conscience is concerned however, I prefer to abstain from an the police was inappropriate in the circumstances and completely opinion. Regardless, along the same lines, in a reference to the contrary to the charter. This alone is extremely troubling and worthy Commissioner of Police in R. v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, of attention. Worst of all is the possibility that political interference Ex parte Blackburn, in 1968, Lord Denning stated as follows: may have been one of the causes of this mess. He must decide whether or not suspected persons are to be prosecuted; and, if need be, bring the prosecution or see that it is brought; but in all these things he is not the servant of anyone, save of the law itself. No Minister of the Crown can tell him In his report, the commissioner emphasized that he did not agree that he must, or must not, keep observation on this place or that; or that he must, or with the contention of counsel for the complainants that, in ensuring must not, prosecute this man or that one. Nor can any police authority tell him so. the personal attendance of Indonesian President Suharto, the The responsibility for law enforcement lies on him. He is answerable to the law and government would have taken care to see that he was not to the law alone. embarrassed. Hence the premature takeover of the Museum of Once the premises have been established, the following holds. Anthropology, the extent of the security perimeter and the noise-free First, the government must not under any consideration exercise zone.
Recommended publications
  • Chretien Consensus
    End of the CHRÉTIEN CONSENSUS? Jason Clemens Milagros Palacios Matthew Lau Niels Veldhuis Copyright ©2017 by the Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. The authors of this publication have worked independently and opinions expressed by them are, therefore, their own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Fraser Institute or its supporters, Directors, or staff. This publication in no way implies that the Fraser Institute, its Directors, or staff are in favour of, or oppose the passage of, any bill; or that they support or oppose any particular political party or candidate. Date of issue: March 2017 Printed and bound in Canada Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data End of the Chrétien Consensus? / Jason Clemens, Matthew Lau, Milagros Palacios, and Niels Veldhuis Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-88975-437-9 Contents Introduction 1 Saskatchewan’s ‘Socialist’ NDP Begins the Journey to the Chrétien Consensus 3 Alberta Extends and Deepens the Chrétien Consensus 21 Prime Minister Chrétien Introduces the Chrétien Consensus to Ottawa 32 Myths of the Chrétien Consensus 45 Ontario and Alberta Move Away from the Chrétien Consensus 54 A New Liberal Government in Ottawa Rejects the Chrétien Consensus 66 Conclusions and Recommendations 77 Endnotes 79 www.fraserinstitute.org d Fraser Institute d i ii d Fraser Institute d www.fraserinstitute.org Executive Summary TheChrétien Consensus was an implicit agreement that transcended political party and geography regarding the soundness of balanced budgets, declining government debt, smaller and smarter government spending, and competi- tive taxes that emerged in the early 1990s and lasted through to roughly the mid-2000s.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Parliament
    Foreign Policy White Papers and the Role of Canada’s Parliament: Paradoxical But Not Without Potential Gerald J. Schmitz Principal analyst, international affairs Parliamentary Information and Research Service Library of Parliament, Ottawa Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association University of Western Ontario, London Panel on “International and Defence Policy Review” 3 June 2005 Note: This paper developed out of remarks to a conference in Quebec City in May 2004 on the subject of white-paper foreign policy management processes, and is a pre- publication draft of an article for the fall 2005 issue of Études internationales. The views expressed are the author’s alone. Please do not cite without permission. Introduction to the Paradoxical Actor on the Hill The observations that follow draw on several decades of direct experience working with that paradoxical, and sometimes overlooked, actor in the foreign policy development process, namely Canada’s Parliament. During that time concerns about the alleged weaknesses of parliamentary oversight of the executive have become a commonplace complaint. They seem also to be a staple assumption in the academic discourse on Canadian foreign policy, when the legislative role merits any mention at all. (Frequently it does not.) Yet if one believes the renewed rhetoric emanating from high places about redressing “democratic deficits” in the Canadian body politic, this was all supposed to change. At the end of 2003, a new prime minister ushering in a new management regime, or at least a different style of governing, said that he and his government were committed to changing the way things work in Ottawa.
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday, February 1, 2001
    CANADA VOLUME 137 S NUMBER 004 S 1st SESSION S 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, February 1, 2001 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 67 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, February 1, 2001 The House met at 10 a.m. protection of employees in the public service who make allega- tions in good faith respecting wrongdoing in the public service. _______________ He said: Mr. Speaker, the purpose of the bill is to protect the Prayers members of the Public Service of Canada who blow the whistle in _______________ good faith for wrongdoing in the public service, such as reports of waste, fraud, corruption, abuse of authority, violation of law or D (1005 ) threats to public health or safety. The public interest is served when employees are free to make such reports without fear of retaliation [English] and discrimination. MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE Therefore, I am very pleased to introduce my private member’s The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a bill, entitled an act respecting the protection of employees in the message has been received from the Senate informing this House public service who make allegations in good faith respecting that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of wrongdoing in the public service. this House is desired. (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) _____________________________________________ * * * ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS ACT [Translation] Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Requisites of Leadership in the Modern House of Commons 1
    Number 4 November 2001 CANADIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP HE EQUISITES OF EADERSHIP THE REQUISITES OF LEADERSHIP IN THE MODERN HOUSE OF COMMONS Paper by: Cristine de Clercy Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan Canadian Members of the Study of Parliament Executive Committee Group 2000-2001 The Canadian Study of President Parliament Group (CSPG) was created Leo Doyle with the object of bringing together all those with an interest in parliamentary Vice-President institutions and the legislative F. Leslie Seidle process, to promote understanding and to contribute to their reform and Past President improvement. Judy Cedar-Wilson The constitution of the Canadian Treasurer Study of Parliament Group makes Antonine Campbell provision for various activities, including the organization of conferences and Secretary seminars in Ottawa and elsewhere in James R. Robertson Canada, the preparation of articles and various publications, the Counsellors establishment of workshops, the Dianne Brydon promotion and organization of public William Cross discussions on parliamentary affairs, David Docherty participation in public affairs programs Jeff Heynen on radio and television, and the Tranquillo Marrocco sponsorship of other educational Louis Massicotte activities. Charles Robert Jennifer Smith Membership is open to all those interested in Canadian legislative institutions. Applications for membership and additional information concerning the Group should be addressed to the Secretariat, Canadian Study of Parliament Group, Box 660, West Block, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6. Tel: (613) 943-1228, Fax: (613) 995- 5357. INTRODUCTION This is the fourth paper in the Canadian Study of Parliament Groups Parliamentary Perspectives. First launched in 1998, the perspective series is intended as a vehicle for distributing both studies prepared by academics and the reflections of others who have a particular interest in these themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..170 Hansard
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 137 Ï NUMBER 182 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 3, 2002 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 11161 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 3, 2002 The House met at 10 a.m. We must, however, take care not to go to the opposite extreme and enact legislation with potential negative impact on the rights and freedoms of those we wish to protect, under the guise of fighting Prayers terrorism. We do not have to go far back in time to recall the late unlamented Bill C-42, so criticized for its negative effects on Ï (1010) fundamental rights and freedoms. [English] At the time, the government was busy boasting right and left of BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE what an ardent promoter of public security it was, rejecting the criticisms that were being made from this side of the House. Now The Deputy Speaker: It is my duty pursuant to Standing Order here we are again, starting off a new debate on a similar bill, 81 to inform the House that the motion to be considered Monday although a few changes have been made. during consideration of the business of supply is as follows: That, in the opinion of this House, the government should cease and desist its Why are we having this new debate? Simply because the public, sustained legislative and political attacks on the lives and livelihoods of rural Canadians and the communities where they live.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits to Influence: the Club of Rome and Canada
    THE LIMITS TO INFLUENCE: THE CLUB OF ROME AND CANADA, 1968 TO 1988 by JASON LEMOINE CHURCHILL A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2006 © Jason Lemoine Churchill, 2006 Declaration AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A THESIS I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This dissertation is about influence which is defined as the ability to move ideas forward within, and in some cases across, organizations. More specifically it is about an extraordinary organization called the Club of Rome (COR), who became advocates of the idea of greater use of systems analysis in the development of policy. The systems approach to policy required rational, holistic and long-range thinking. It was an approach that attracted the attention of Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. Commonality of interests and concerns united the disparate members of the COR and allowed that organization to develop an influential presence within Canada during Trudeau’s time in office from 1968 to 1984. The story of the COR in Canada is extended beyond the end of the Trudeau era to explain how the key elements that had allowed the organization and its Canadian Association (CACOR) to develop an influential presence quickly dissipated in the post- 1984 era. The key reasons for decline were time and circumstance as the COR/CACOR membership aged, contacts were lost, and there was a political paradigm shift that was antithetical to COR/CACOR ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..156 Hansard
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 137 Ï NUMBER 184 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, May 7, 2002 (Part A) Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 11263 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, May 7, 2002 The House met at 10 a.m. [Translation] Prayers CANADA POST Mr. Pierre Paquette (Joliette, BQ): Mr. Speaker, I would like to ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS present a petition signed by citizens of my riding. Ï (1000) The petitioners are asking the government to repeal subsection 13 [English] (5) of the Canada Post Corporation Act, which prohibits rural mail GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS couriers from bargaining collectively to improve their working conditions. Mr. Geoff Regan (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8) I have the honour to table, in both Ms. Galarneau, a constituent from my riding who worked as rural official languages, the government's response to three petitions. mail courier for ten years, arbitrarily lost her contract and has no recourse. *** Ï (1005) If subsection 13(5) were repealed, as requested in the petition, CANADIAN SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT Ms. Galarneau could have participated in a class action. I therefore Mr. John Herron (Fundy—Royal, PC) moved for leave to submit this petition. introduce Bill C-462, an act to ensure safe drinking water throughout Canada. Mr. Bernard Patry (Pierrefonds—Dollard, Lib.): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..156 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 112 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, June 5, 2003 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 6883 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, June 5, 2003 The House met at 10 a.m. national security. As parliamentarians, we have a duty to the people of Canada to represent, to serve and to debate. As a minister I have a responsibility to inform and that is my purpose here today. Prayers We live in a world still scarred by the events of September 11, 2001. Since then, the world and Canada have taken great strides to enhance security. Terrorist networks have been disrupted, but they ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS are still capable of striking. The attacks in Bali, Saudi Arabia and Morocco are proof of this. That is why it is more important than ever Ï (1005) to ensure we do whatever we can to protect Canadians, our countries, [English] and our friends from the threat of terrorism. That is why it is as INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS important to understand what is going on halfway around the world as it is to understand what is happening in Canada. The Speaker: I have the honour to lay upon the table the report of the Canadian parliamentary delegation concerning its visit to Morocco and Egypt from April 13 to 23, 2003. Canada is not immune from the threat of terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday, June 4, 1998
    CANADA 1st SESSION 36th PARLIAMENT VOLUME 137 NUMBER 68 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, June 4, 1998 THE HONOURABLE GILDAS L. MOLGAT SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue.) Debates: Victoria Building, Room 407, Tel. 996-0397 Published by the Senate Available from Canada Communication Group — Publishing, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa K1A 0S9, at $1.75 per copy or $158 per year. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1635 THE SENATE Thursday, June 4, 1998 The Senate met at 2:00 p.m., the Hon. the Acting Speaker and extended parents, in recognition of his outstanding work in Eymard G. Corbin in the Chair. the promotion of human equality, family law and social policy. He has also come out in favour of the decriminalization of Prayers. marijuana, and has taken a special interest in the use of drugs in this country and the need to develop a more realistic policy regarding them. THE HONOURABLE DUNCAN J. JESSIMAN Hon. Senators: Hear, hear! TRIBUTES ON RETIREMENT Senator Lynch-Staunton: His passionate interest in the Hon. John Lynch-Staunton (Leader of the Opposition): welfare of veterans derives in large part from the fact that he Honourable senators, I rise to pay tribute to our colleague himself is one, having served with distinction in the Royal Duncan Jessiman, who sits here today for the last time, since Canadian Navy, which he joined in 1942 and left at the end of the tomorrow, June 5, he will reach the mandatory retirement age. war with the rank of lieutenant.
    [Show full text]
  • 13542 DIP MAG May/June.V4
    Christina Spencer on 15 Years of Canadian Diplomacy November–December 2004 Mexican Evolution Ten Years of Free Trade Maria Teresa Garcia de Madero, Ambassador of Mexico Allan Thompson critiques the Foreign Policy Review process The trouble with Jeremy Rifkin Democracy for export: To impose or lead by example? And introducing Margaret Dickensen, gourmet goddess Nov/Dec 2004 CDN $5.95 PM 40957514 Volume 15, Number 6 PUBLISHER Our 15th anniversary issue Lezlee Cribb EDITOR Jennifer Campbell CONTRIBUTING EDITOR Table of Daniel Drolet CULTURE EDITOR Margo Roston CONTENTS COPY EDITOR Roger Bird EDITOR EMERITUS DIPLOMATICA| Bhupinder S. Liddar Happy birthday to us . .4 CONTRIBUTING WRITERS News and Culture . .5 George Abraham Roger Bird Envoy’s Photo Album . 8 Laura Bonikowsky Cleaning up the Carribean . .10 Thomas D’Aquino Diplo-dates . .11 Margaret Dickensen Recent Arrivals . .12 Joe Geurts Canadian Appointments . .14 Gurprit Kindra David Long Carlos Miranda DISPATCHES| Christina Spencer Diplomacy over this magazine’s lifespan Allan Thompson Christina Spencer looks back on 15 years . .15 Philémon Yang Dating diplomacy: A chronological countdown . 19 COVER PHOTOGRAPHY Jana Chytilova Democracy to go CONTRIBUTING ARTIST Differing diplomatic approaches to freedom . .20 Hilary Ashby The Canadian Parliamentary Centre advocates the subtle approach . .24 CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHER Sam Garcia After NAFTA OFFICE ASSISTANT Trade Winds: Mexico’s ambassador talks trade . .25 Colin Anderson NAFTA by the numbers . .27 OTTAWA ADVERTISING SALES Lezlee Cribb (613) 789-6890 DELIGHTS| NATIONAL ADVERTISING SALES Entertaining: Margaret Dickensen’s memories of the Soviet Union . .29 On the Go: Margo Roston on the sounds of a Russian symphony . .32 (613) 234-8468, ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, June 20, 1995
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 222 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, June 20, 1995 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, June 20, 1995 The House met at 10 a.m. (1005) _______________ [Translation] COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE Prayers ENVIRONMENT _______________ Hon. Charles Caccia (Davenport, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the fifth report ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS of the Standing Committee on the Environment and Sustainable Development, on the statutory review of the Canadian Environ- mental Protection Act. [English] The report, entitled It’s About Our Health! Towards Pollution GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS Prevention in English and Notre santé en dépend! Vers la prévention de la pollution in French, contains 141 recommenda- Hon. Alfonso Gagliano (Secretary of State (Parliamentary tions and is the result of 12 months of lengthy hearings held in Affairs) and Deputy Leader of the Government in the House Ottawa and all parts of the country. of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the [English] government’s response to 10 petitions. The report perhaps could be summarized as urging Parliament and the government to adhere to the fact that the protection of * * * humans and ecosystems requires strong federal leadership, [Translation] including national standards and mirror legislation in close co–operation with provinces and territories. INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS I thank the members of all parties for their co–operation and Mr. Don Boudria (Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, Lib.): full commitment in the production of this report. I thank the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 119 Synthesis Iof Comments on the Review.Pdf
    i ii Synthesis of Public Comment on the Forthcoming Review by the Federal Governments of Canada and the United States of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement A Report to the Governments of the United States and Canada January 2006 The views expressed in this synthesis are those of the individuals and organizations who participated in the public comment process. They are not the views of the International Joint Commission. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis Herb Gray Dennis Schornack Chair, Canadian Section Chair, United States Section Robert Gourd Irene Brooks Commissioner Commissioner Jack Blaney Allen Olson Commissioner Commissioner International Joint Commission Offices Canadian Section United States Section 234 Laurier Ave. West, 22nd Floor 1250 23rd Street, NW, Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1P 6K6 Washington, D.C. 20440 Phone: (613) 995-2984 Phone: (202) 736-9000 Fax: (613) 993-5583 Fax: (202) 467-0746 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Great Lakes Regional Office 100 Ouellette Avenue, 8th Floor Windsor, ON N9A 6T3 or P.O. Box 32869, Detroit, MI 48232 Phone: (519) 257-6700 or (313) 226-2170 Fax: (519) 257-6740 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements The International Joint Commission thanks the people from the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence River and beyond who took part in the public comment process and whose voices are echoed in this report. ISBN 1-894280-60-1 This report is available online at www.ijc.org.
    [Show full text]