DOCSLIB.ORG

Core 1..156 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Core 1..156 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 7.50) CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 112 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, June 5, 2003 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 6883 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, June 5, 2003 The House met at 10 a.m. national security. As parliamentarians, we have a duty to the people of Canada to represent, to serve and to debate. As a minister I have a responsibility to inform and that is my purpose here today. Prayers We live in a world still scarred by the events of September 11, 2001. Since then, the world and Canada have taken great strides to enhance security. Terrorist networks have been disrupted, but they ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS are still capable of striking. The attacks in Bali, Saudi Arabia and Morocco are proof of this. That is why it is more important than ever Ï (1005) to ensure we do whatever we can to protect Canadians, our countries, [English] and our friends from the threat of terrorism. That is why it is as INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS important to understand what is going on halfway around the world as it is to understand what is happening in Canada. The Speaker: I have the honour to lay upon the table the report of the Canadian parliamentary delegation concerning its visit to Morocco and Egypt from April 13 to 23, 2003. Canada is not immune from the threat of terrorism. In fact, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, whose public report I have *** tabled today, is aware of emerging terrorist threats and tactics that could have severe consequences for Canadians. The possibility that CANADIAN SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear weapons could be Hon. Wayne Easter (Solicitor General of Canada, Lib.): Mr. acquired and used by terrorist groups must be taken seriously. We Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), I have the honour to cannot be complacent and simply believe that it could not happen. table, in both official languages, copies of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service 2002 public report. In November last year, the media reported widely on a statement *** attributed to Osama bin Laden, including Canada among countries deserving, from his perspective, retribution for supporting the war on [Translation] terror. We must acknowledge that Canada is threatened by terrorism. AIR TRAVEL Simply wishing otherwise will not make it go away. That said, there Mr. Marcel Proulx (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister is a need to balance the interests of the state and the broader of Transport, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the Minister of community with the rights and freedoms of individuals. Transport, pursuant to section 85.1 of the Canada Transport Act, I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the report of the Canada has become increasingly involved in the campaign against Air Travel Complaints Commissioner for July 1, 2002 to December terror. From the listing of entities, to the freezing of assets, to the 31, 2002. signing and ratification of international agreements, our efforts to combat terrorism have been both comprehensive and balanced. We *** continue to work with our international partners, especially those in GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS the G-8. In fact, the Prime Minister just attended one such meeting in this ongoing effort. Mr. Geoff Regan (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8) I have the honour to table, in both On December 24, 2001, the Anti-Terrorism Act was brought into official languages, the government's response to 20 petitions. force. It has new and strong powers, and provides government with the ability to create a list of terrorist entities based on intelligence *** reports and information that the entity either has carried out, [English] participated in or facilitated a terrorist activity. So far, we have listed 26 entities and work continues to identify and list more. The TERRORISM consequences of dealing with a listed entity are severe. In addition to Hon. Wayne Easter (Solicitor General of Canada, Lib.): Mr. seizure and forfeiture of property, penalties include up to 10 years Speaker, it is my privilege to address the House on matters of imprisonment. 6884 COMMONS DEBATES June 5, 2003 Routine Proceedings As required under the new legislation, the government has already I welcome this opportunity to respond to the Solicitor General's reported to Parliament on the use of the new provisions in the act. As statement. I must question why the statement was made. The we have said before, we want to ensure our law enforcement and Solicitor General, other than tabling the Canadian Security security intelligence agencies have the tools they need to protect Intelligence Service public report, provided us with absolutely no Canadians, and we have done so while respecting the fundamental new information or updates on the status of security in this country. rights of Canadians to privacy. Safeguarding the public against the Repeatedly the Solicitor General stated: threat of terror remains the service's first priority, with Islamic We must acknowledge that Canada is threatened by terrorism. Recent events extremism being at the top of the list in its counterterrorism program. remind us that Canada is not immune from the threat or from acts of terrorism. The September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States clearly demonstrated the threats posed by these groups. But the global The Solicitor General and the government should have recognized security environment constantly changes and we must be aware of this long before September 11. Canada is not immune and was not that. We must stand on guard against these dangers and adapt to the immune from terrorism. challenges they pose. I stood in the House together with many of my Canadian Alliance Ï (1010) colleagues months prior to September 11 condemning the govern- We must ensure we have the best people, the best information, and ment and questioning it for its failure to take the threat of terrorism the most up to date technology and legislation to fight these threats. and the threat of organized crime in this country seriously. Since 9/11 We have been active on all these fronts. Advances in communication we have repeatedly demanded that the government improve the and transportation as well as increased trade and migration have intelligence capability of our security forces by providing them with affected every part of our lives. They have also affected how we the much needed resources to do their job effectively. must protect ourselves against terror. We have repeatedly condemned the government for the inordinate It is increasingly clear that no one agency or single government amount of time it took to compile the initial listing of terrorist can fight this threat alone. Partnerships and cooperation are at the entities and the snail's pace at which it brought other names forward heart of our efforts to maintain safety and security. As far as CSIS is to be added to that list. Bill C-36, the anti-terrorism act, received concerned, I am pleased to confirm that this cooperation already royal assent in December 2001. It is a year and a half later and only existed before, but has been solidified since, especially with agencies 26 entities are listed as terrorist organizations, while the United in the United States, our neighbour and friend. CSIS maintains Nations' list includes and identifies some 200. relationships with departments and agencies at all levels of government in Canada and with more than 230 foreign agencies in Once again I take great exception to the Solicitor General's over 130 countries. contention that the government's efforts to combat terrorism have “been both comprehensive and balanced”. Since September 11, 2001, CSIS has significantly increased its information exchange with its partners, but it has not changed the If, as we have said repeatedly, the government is truly committed fundamental way it works. Security intelligence is still collected, to the global war on terrorism, the Solicitor General should be doing analyzed, and reported to government according to the same much more, such as identifying and listing the entities at a much methods and procedures laid down in the legislation that created faster rate and significantly increasing the resources to both CSIS the service as a separate, civilian, security intelligence organization and the RCMP. The government should be tightening airport and nearly 20 years ago. However, the war on terror has intensified the port security. It should be providing CSIS with the power and the pressures and demands on the service, and it has focused the authority to operate abroad rather than relying and piggybacking on attention of the world. We are part of a global effort to keep our other foreign countries for intelligence information. countries and our communities safe, free, and free from fear. As a member of the Subcommittee on National Security, I have Our war on terrorism is a war against those who create fear by repeatedly questioned witnesses regarding whether or not the powers murderous means, those who would indiscriminately inflict harm on of CSIS should be expanded, or whether a new and separate agency our people, and those who seek to attack our way of life through should be established based on differing opinions and different violent means and hide in the very freedoms that our society individuals coming forward with different ideas regarding this. provides. Let me be perfectly clear. The war on terrorism will continue and In 2002 Richard Fadden, the former deputy clerk of the Privy undergo even more changes in the future.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
    ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..170 Hansard
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 137 Ï NUMBER 182 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 3, 2002 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 11161 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 3, 2002 The House met at 10 a.m. We must, however, take care not to go to the opposite extreme and enact legislation with potential negative impact on the rights and freedoms of those we wish to protect, under the guise of fighting Prayers terrorism. We do not have to go far back in time to recall the late unlamented Bill C-42, so criticized for its negative effects on Ï (1010) fundamental rights and freedoms. [English] At the time, the government was busy boasting right and left of BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE what an ardent promoter of public security it was, rejecting the criticisms that were being made from this side of the House. Now The Deputy Speaker: It is my duty pursuant to Standing Order here we are again, starting off a new debate on a similar bill, 81 to inform the House that the motion to be considered Monday although a few changes have been made. during consideration of the business of supply is as follows: That, in the opinion of this House, the government should cease and desist its Why are we having this new debate? Simply because the public, sustained legislative and political attacks on the lives and livelihoods of rural Canadians and the communities where they live.
    [Show full text]
  • The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally
    Constitutional Confusion on the Left: The NDP’s Position in Canada’s Constitutional Debates Murray Cooke [email protected] First Draft: Please do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 2004, Winnipeg The federal New Democratic Party experienced a dramatic electoral decline in the 1990s from which it has not yet recovered. Along with difficulties managing provincial economies, the NDP was wounded by Canada’s constitutional debates. The NDP has historically struggled to present a distinctive social democratic approach to Canada’s constitution. Like its forerunner, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the NDP has supported a liberal, (English-Canadian) nation-building approach that fits comfortably within the mainstream of Canadian political thought. At the same time, the party has prioritized economic and social polices rather than seriously addressing issues such as the deepening of democracy or the recognition of national or regional identities. Travelling without a roadmap, the constitutional debates of the 80s and 90s proved to be a veritable minefield for the NDP. Through three rounds of mega- constitutional debate (1980-82, 1987-1990, 1991-1992), the federal party leadership supported the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day, only to be torn by disagreements from within. This paper will argue that the NDP’s division, lack of direction and confusion over constitution issues can be traced back to longstanding weaknesses in the party’s social democratic theory and strategy. First of all, the CCF- NDP embraced rather than challenged the parameters and institutions of liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan September 2001 to December 2002
    FIRST DRAFT - FOR REVIEW ACTION PLAN SEPTEMBER 2001 TO DECEMBER 2002 PRESENTED TO THE COALITION TO RENEW CANADA'S INFRASTRUCTURE (CRCI) Montréal, February 7, 2004 CURRENT GGA CONTRACT The stated current objective by the Coalition to Renew Canada's Infrastructure (CRCI) (TRIP/CANADA) to GGA Communications Inc. (GGA) is to secure federal investment into Canada's National Highway System by way of a National Highway Program. The current contract pays GGA a $7,500/month retainer fee, and runs from June to September 2001. All related expenses are included in this monthly retainer. The contract can be terminated by either party providing a one month notice of termination. For this retainer fee, the CRCI receives the following services: ! General government relations assistance. ! Access to Québec-based cabinet ministers, members of Parliament (MPs) and Senator not contacted or easily accessed before. ! Coordination and execution of a MPs meeting blitz. This blitz will target Québec based MPs at first, followed by MPs in Ontario. GGA will coordinate the attendance of local contractors, issue a news release and coordinate any other necessary details with CRCI and member associations. The CRCI has experienced success with cabinet ministers and MPs outside Québec. However, when appropriate, GGA will assist in making contact with MPs and ministers outside of Québec. ! Access to key political staff and people of influence in both circle of friends of the Prime Minister as well as the Federal Minister of Finance. ! Media relations assistance. GGA has provided the resources of Mr. Jean-René Gagnon, Senior Vice-President & Partner, Mr. Pablo Rodriguez, Vice-President & Partner and Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 139 Ï NUMBER 020 Ï 3rd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, February 27, 2004 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1145 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, February 27, 2004 The House met at 10 a.m. Equalization, as hon. members know, is the federal government's most important program for reducing fiscal disparities among Prayers provinces. It ensures that the less prosperous provinces have the capacity to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation. GOVERNMENT ORDERS This is not about the level of equalization. This is about the payment of equalization and extending legislative authority to carry Ï (1000) on with payments of equalization. [English] [Translation] FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL FISCAL ARRANGEMENTS ACT Bill C-18 supports these two important programs and makes it Hon. Judy Sgro (for the Minister of Finance) moved that Bill possible to reach two goals. C-18, an act respecting equalization and authorizing the Minister of Finance to make certain payments related to health, be read the third [English] time and passed. First, it provides the Minister of Finance with the authority to continue to make equalization payments according to the current Ï (1005) formula for up to a year in the event that the renewal legislation is not in place by April 1, 2004. Hon. John McKay (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance, Lib.): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..158 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.55.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 015 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, October 25, 2002 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 899 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, October 25, 2002 La séance est ouverte à 10 heures. Allow me to describe this system. The Lobbyists Registration Act is based on four major principles. Prière Ï (1005) First, freedom of access to crown institutions is in the public GOVERNMENT ORDERS interest. Ï (1000) Second, lobbying public office holders is a legitimate activity. [Translation] LOBBYISTS REGISTRATION ACT Third, it is advisable to give public office holders and the public the opportunity to know who is trying to influence crown Minister of Industry—Second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on institutions. Industry, Science and Technology. Hon. Don Boudria (on behalf of the Minister of Industry): Mr. Fourth, a registration system for hired lobbyists should not impede Speaker, I move that Bill C-15, An Act to amend the Lobbyists freedom of access to crown institutions. Registration Act, be referred forthwith to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology. The act currently defines three categories of lobbyists. I want to point out that, in all cases, these are people who are paid to perform Mr. Serge Marcil (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of lobbying activities. They are not volunteers or people whose civic Industry, Lib.): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, June 8, 1999
    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 240 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, June 8, 1999 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 15957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, June 8, 1999 The House met at 10 a.m. International Space Station and to make related amendments to other Acts. _______________ (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) Prayers * * * _______________ PETITIONS ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS CHILD PORNOGRAPHY Mr. Werner Schmidt (Kelowna, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, it is D (1005) indeed an honour and a privilege to present some 3,000-plus [Translation] petitioners who have come to the House with a petition. They would request that parliament take all measures necessary to GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS ensure that possession of child pornography remains a serious criminal offence, and that federal police forces be directed to give Mr. Peter Adams (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the priority to enforcing this law for the protection of our children. Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in This is a wonderful petition and I endorse it 100%. both official languages, the government’s response to 10 petitions. THE CONSTITUTION * * * Mr. Svend J. Robinson (Burnaby—Douglas, NDP): Mr. [English] Speaker, I am presenting two petitions this morning. The first petition has been signed by residents of my constituency of COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE Burnaby—Douglas as well as communities across Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Court File No.: CV-18-00605134-00CP ONTARIO
    Court File No.: CV-18-00605134-00CP ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: MICKY GRANGER Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO Defendant Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 MOTION RECORD OF THE PLAINTIFF (CERTIFICATION) (Returnable November 27 & 28, 2019) VOLUME II of II March 18, 2019 GOLDBLATT PARTNERS LLP 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1039 Toronto ON M5G 2C2 Jody Brown LS# 58844D Tel: 416-979-4251 / Fax: 416-591-7333 Email: [email protected] Geetha Philipupillai LS# 74741S Tel.: 416-979-4252 / Fax: 416-591-7333 Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Plaintiff - 2 TO: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT - OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO Crown Law Office – Civil Law 720 Bay Street, 8th Floor Toronto, ON, M5G 2K1 Amy Leamen LS#: 49351R Tel: 416.326.4153 / Fax: 416.326.4181 Lawyers for the Defendant TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB DESCRIPTION PG # 1. Notice of Motion (Returnable November 27 and 28, 2019) 1 A. Appendix “A” – List of Common Issues 6 2. Affidavit of Micky Granger (Unsworn) 8 3. Affidavit of Tanya Atherfold-Desilva sworn March 18, 2019 12 A. Exhibit “A”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director – 20 Systemic Review Report dated July 2016 B. Exhibit “B”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director - 126 Executive Summary and Recommendations dated July 2016 C. Exhibit “C”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director – Terms of 142 Reference as of March 2019 D. Exhibit “D”: Affidavit of David D.J. Truax sworn August 30, 2016 146 E. Exhibit “E”: Centre of Forensic Investigators & Submitters Technical 155 Information Sheets effective April 2, 2015 F.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004-05-12 Pre-Election Spending
    Federal Announcements Since April 1, 2004 Date Department Program Amount Time Span Location Recipeint MP Present Tally All Government 6,830,827,550 Per Day 151,796,168 1-Apr-04 Industry TPC 7,200,000 Burnaby, BC Xantrex Technologies Hon. David Anderson 1-Apr-04 Industry TPC 9,500,000 Richmond, BC Sierra Wireless Hon. David Anderson 2-Apr-04 Industry TPC 9,360,000 London, ON Trojona Technologies Pat O'Brien 5-Apr-04 Industry Canada Research Chairs 121,600,000 Calgary, AB Hon. Lucienne Robillard 7-Apr-04 Industry TPC 3,900,000 Drumondville, PQ VisuAide Hon. Lucienne Robillard 7-Apr-04 Industry TPC 5,600,000 Montreal, PQ Fermag Hon. Lucienne Robillard 13-Apr-04 Industry 75,000,000 Quebec, PQ Genome Canada Hon. Lucienne Robillard 26-Apr-04 Industry TPC 3,760,000 Vancouver, BC Offshore Systems Hon. David Anderson 28-Apr-04 Industry TPC 8,700,000 Vancouver, BC Honeywell ASCa Hon. David Anderson 3-May-04 Industry TPC 7,700,000 Ottawa, ON MetroPhotonics Eugene Bellemare 4-May-04 Industry TPC 7,500,000 Port Coquitlam, BC OMNEX Control; Systems Hon. David Anderson 6-May-04 Industry TPC 4,600,000 Kanata, ON Cloakware Corporation Hon. David Pratt 7-May-04 Industry TPC 4,000,000 Waterloo, ON Raytheon Canada Limited Hon. Andrew Telegdi 7-May-04 Industry TPC 6,000,000 Ottawa, ON Edgeware Computer Systems Hon. David Pratt 13-May-04 Industry Bill C-9 170,000,000 Ottawa, ON Hon. Pierre Pettigrew 14-May-04 Industry TPC 4,000,000 Brossard, PQ Adacel Ltd Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Mercredi 1Er Avril 1992 Vol. 32 - No 6 Table Des Matières
    Le mercredi 1er avril 1992 Vol. 32 - No 6 Table des matières Affaires du jour Affaires prioritaires 249 Reprise du débat sur le discours d'ouverture et sur les motions de censure M. Yvon Picotte 249 Mme Pauline Marais 252 Motion de censure 255 M. Albert Khelfa 256 M. Jacques Brassard 259 Motion de censure 262 M. Réjean Doyon 262 M. André Boulerice 264 M. André Vallerand 267 Affaires courantes 270 Dépôt de documents Projets de loi de l'État du Massachusetts 270 Rapport annuel du Conseil de la recherche et du développement en transport 270 Prévisions budgétaires et rapport financier préliminaire du Directeur général des élections 270 Prévisions budgétaires et rapport financier préliminaire de la Commission de la représentation électorale 270 Questions et réponses orales Position du gouvernement sur la tenue d'un référendum pancanadien sur la Constitution 270 Accès aux études des ministères sur l'intégration des fonctionnaires fédéraux à la fonction publique québécoise 271 Nomination de M. Billy Diamond à titre de représentant du gouvernement au comité d'évaluation environnementale de Grande-Baleine 274 Changements dans les formulaires d'impôt du Québec 275 Reconduction du décret des travailleurs de l'industrie du verre plat 276 Position du ministre de l'Éducation face aux recommandations du rapport Chambers 277 Subvention à l'institut Nazareth et Louis-Braille 277 Accessibilité aux concours de l'Office des ressources humaines 278 Réponse différée Projet de loi américain pour empêcher des obligations d'Hydro-Québec 279 Motions sans préavis Souligner la victoire du président Frederik De Klerk pour mettre fin à l'apartheid en Afrique du Sud 280 M.
    [Show full text]
  • FEBRUARY 2003 Graham Fraser
    THE NDP LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE—RE-CONNECTING THE LEFT TO THE MIDDLE In the run-up to the NDP leadership vote on January 25, party activists faced a difficult choice between two apparent front runners, the well known face of NDP House Leader Bill Blaikie of Manitoba, and Toronto city councillor Jack Layton, an interesting new face with national credentials as president of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. While Blaikie represents the party’s deep roots in the West and the co-operative movement, Layton represents the possibility of taking the NDP back into the cities and union towns of southern Ontario, where it was strong during the era of Ed Broadbent from 1975-1988, a highwater mark in NDP history. Toronto Star columnist Graham Fraser, widely acclaimed for his books on Canadian politics, offers this situational update on a party confronting an agonizing choice. Graham Fraser En prévision du scrutin à la direction du Nouveau Parti Démocratique du 25 janvier, les militants font face à un choix difficile entre les deux candidats les plus en vue : le Manitobain Bill Blaikie, leader du NPD à la Chambre des communes, et Jack Layton, conseiller municipal de la ville de Toronto et un temps président de la Fédération canadienne des municipalités. Un premier visage très connu, donc, et un second qui gagne à l’être. Si Blaikie représente le profond enracinement du parti dans l’Ouest du pays et le mouvement coopératif, Layton incarne pour sa part l’espoir de lui rendre la popularité dont il jouissait dans les grands centres et les villes ouvrières du sud de l’Ontario, où le NPD a connu une période historiquement fastueuse sous le règne d’Ed Broadbent, de 1975 à 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • The Waffle, the New Democratic Party, and Canada's New Left During the Long Sixties
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-13-2019 1:00 PM 'To Waffleo t the Left:' The Waffle, the New Democratic Party, and Canada's New Left during the Long Sixties David G. Blocker The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Fleming, Keith The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in History A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © David G. Blocker 2019 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons Recommended Citation Blocker, David G., "'To Waffleo t the Left:' The Waffle, the New Democratic Party, and Canada's New Left during the Long Sixties" (2019). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 6554. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/6554 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i Abstract The Sixties were time of conflict and change in Canada and beyond. Radical social movements and countercultures challenged the conservatism of the preceding decade, rejected traditional forms of politics, and demanded an alternative based on the principles of social justice, individual freedom and an end to oppression on all fronts. Yet in Canada a unique political movement emerged which embraced these principles but proposed that New Left social movements – the student and anti-war movements, the women’s liberation movement and Canadian nationalists – could bring about radical political change not only through street protests and sit-ins, but also through participation in electoral politics.
    [Show full text]