DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyright © and Moral Rights For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyright © and Moral Rights For Gibson, Hannah Cameron (2012) Auxiliary placement in Rangi: a dynamic syntax perspective. PhD Thesis. SOAS, University of London http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/16637 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. Auxiliary placement in Rangi: A Dynamic Syntax perspective A dissertation submitted to the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics Hannah Cameron Gibson 2012 Declaration I hereby certify that this thesis is the result of my own research and that none of the chapters included have been submitted to any other institution for the fulfillment of a degree. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated. Signed:____________________________ Date:__________________ 2 Abstract The Tanzanian Bantu language Rangi is unusual in that it exhibits a construction in which an infinitival verb form precedes an inflected auxiliary. This ordering of the infinitive with respect to the auxiliary is marked within the context of East African Bantu. It also contradicts Greenberg’s (1963) proposed linguistic universal that Subject Verb Object languages exhibit auxiliary-infinitive order. Whilst the infinitive precedes the auxiliary in main declarative clauses, auxiliary- infinitive order is found in negative, interrogative and cleft constructions, as well as in relative and subordinate clauses. This thesis examines infinitive-auxiliary order in Rangi, providing a detailed description of the structure and contexts in which the construction is used. Based on this, a formal analysis is developed from the perspective of Dynamic Syntax (Kempson et al. 2001; Cann et al. 2005b) – a framework which models the establishment of propositional structure by focusing on the dynamics of the parsing/production process in a time-linear manner. The infinitive-auxiliary order is captured by adopting an analysis in which infinitival verb forms are projected onto an unfixed predicate node. In contrast, auxiliaries project fixed minimal predicate-argument structure and introduce temporal information. The alternation auxiliary-infinitive order is subsequently analysed as resulting from the presence of an unfixed node. The analysis presented depends on the independent restriction operative in the Dynamic Syntax framework under which two unfixed nodes of the same modality cannot co-exist. This restriction is the result of the two nodes being defined identically in terms of tree logic. The presence of an unfixed node is taken as a trigger for the auxiliary-infinitive order, whilst the infinitive-auxiliary order is found in the absence of this trigger. A formal definition of the rule of PREDICATE ADJUNCTION is presented. The analysis provides further support for the availability of the building and re-building of the same structure within a semantic tree which is permissible in Dynamic Syntax. The thesis interrogates the extent to which similar syntactic contexts can be seen to motivate, and inform, distributional properties of similar (and distinct) elements in languages in unrelated language families. 3 Acknowledgements I gratefully acknowledge the support of the Arts and Humanities Research Council Doctoral Award which made this research possible. I also acknowledge the Central Research Fund of the University of London and the Additional Award for Fieldwork granted by the School of Oriental and African Studies, both of which contributed towards the cost of field research I conducted in Tanzania. I am grateful for the support of the Conference Allowance for Research Students awarded by the Faculty of Arts and Humanities, which contributed towards the cost of presenting the findings of my research at conferences. My thanks go to all of those who made this possible, either by helping with the thesis or by helping with me. Many thanks to Phil Jaggar for getting me into linguistics in the first place. To Kirsty Rowan and Monik Charette who held my interest. To Yuhki King and Maryam De Groef who held me together. To Peter Sells and Irina Nikolaeva whose comments and insights were invaluable throughout the MA and PhD process. To Martin Orwin – the reason I came to SOAS – for reminding me what it was all really about. To my fellow PhD-ers, who know what this is like. My heartfelt thanks to Lutz Marten without whom I would be somewhere else and only dreaming of doing this. Your enthusiasm and creativity are infectious, your attention to detail quite extraordinary and your moments of genius, just that. Thank you for your faith. In Dodoma, my thanks go to Margaret Beckett for giving me a roof over my head and electricity when I needed it. To Paulo Kijuu and Yovini Maingu for invaluable insights into their language. To Amelia Issaka for always assuming I would understand. To the Dodoma SIL team with whom I drank numerous cups of tea. In Kondoa, my thanks go to Mzee Gervais Vita and Mzee Michael Andrew, who know everyone. To Fransisca Dossa and Angela Aloisi Kitula who have sharp ears and even sharper tongues. To Beth Lewis for always having an open door. 4 In Haubi, I am indebted to Padre Sha Kijuu, Padre Sokoi and all the masista. I cannot thank you enough for putting me up and for putting up with me. To Marta, Maria, Esta and Mama Marselina – the hours spent talking in the dark and digging in the fields will not be easily forgotten. To Marselina, ever joyous, for songs with actions at times of uncertainty. To Mzee Leo who was patient and tireless when I asked him the same question over and over again. And then once again, just to check. To Mama Seba for showing me what it really means kunyuntera and for cooking pancakes, just when they were needed. Thanks to Vanessa Nyere who was my mulaangi in Preston – who would have thought?! Many thanks also go to Oliver Stegen whose research piqued my interest in the first place. Thank you for being so generous with your data and for steering me in the right direction. I’m sure we’ll meet in person one day! To Margret Dunham for sharing her Rangi corpus with me and for paving the way. To Vera Wilhelmsen for invaluable thoughts on Mbugwe. Numerous people have housed me and fed me and reminded me I was not in it alone over the last few years. My thanks go to my brother Serge Sagna, who I met on my first day at SOAS and who has been my rock ever since. To Naira Antoun for too many late nights, never enough time and friendship like this. To Faiza Bashe for unconditional. To Kamariyah Mbamba and Sami Said for being themselves. To the goats, you know how you are, and you know why. To Abubakar ‘Babu’ Musa, for raha! To the Doubts (the whole clan), who followed. To my brother Richard Bowen, who tuned in at just the right time. To Jenny Doubt, my home from home. To my mother Jill Gibson, who thought nothing of taking my eight-year-old self to Chinese School every Sunday. Some things never change. This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my grandparents – Dorothy Gibson, who loved us all from the very start and John Cameron Gibson, who was with me every step of the way. 5 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................12 1.1 The Rangi language........................................................................................... 12 1.2 Previous studies ................................................................................................. 15 1.3 Auxiliary placement in Rangi............................................................................ 16 1.4 Objectives of the thesis...................................................................................... 18 1.5 Methodology and corpus ................................................................................... 19 1.6 Structure of the thesis ........................................................................................ 20 2 A grammatical sketch of Rangi...................................................................22 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Phonology.......................................................................................................... 22 2.2.1 Consonants ................................................................................................. 22 2.2.2 Vowels........................................................................................................ 23 2.2.3 Tone............................................................................................................ 26 2.2.4 Syllable structure........................................................................................ 27 2.3 Nominal morphology........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Here Referred to As Class 18A (See Hyman 1980:187)
    WS1 Remarks on the nasal classes in Mungbam and Naki Mungbam and Naki are two non-Grassfields Bantoid languages spoken along the northwest frontier of the Grassfields area to the north of the Ring languages. Until recently, they were poorly described, but new data reveals them to show significant nasal noun class patterns, some of which do not appear to have been previously noted for Bantoid. The key patterns are: 1. Like many other languages of their region (see Good et al. 2011), they make productive use of a mysterious diminutive plural prefix with a form like mu-, with associated concords in m, here referred to as Class 18a (see Hyman 1980:187). 2. The five dialects of Mungbam show a level of variation in their nasal classes that one might normally expect of distinct languages. a. Two dialects show no evidence for nasals in Class 6. Two other dialects, Munken and Ngun, show a Class 6 prefix on nouns of form a- but nasal concords. In Munken Class 6, this nasal is n, clearly distinct from an m associated with 6a; in Ngun, both 6 and 6a are associated with m concords. The Abar dialect shows a different pattern, with Class 6 nasal concords in m and nasal prefixes on some Class 6 nouns. b. The Abar, Biya, and Ngun dialects show a Class 18a prefix with form mN-, rather than the more regionally common mu-. This reduction is presumably connected to perseveratory nasalization attested throughout the languages of the region with a diachronic pathway along the lines of mu- > mũ- > mN- perhaps providing a partial example for the development of Bantu Class 9/10.
    [Show full text]
  • Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.3
    Griscom, Richard, Andrew Harvey, and Anne Kruijt (eds.). 2020. Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4300224 Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.3 December 1st, 2020 1 Introduction This document is a bibliography of the languages of the Rift Valley Area of Tanzania, which is home to dozens of distinctive ethnic groups and languages. Uniquely, it is the meeting place of languages from three of the largest language families in Africa—Nilo-Saharan, Niger-Congo, and Afro-Asiatic—as well as Sandawe, a language with possible affinity with the so-called 'Khoisan' group, and Hadza, a language isolate, which means that it is not known to be related to any other languages currently spoken. The Rift Valley Bibliography is compiled by members of the Rift Valley Network and is hosted on the network website at the Rift Valley Bibliography page. This is a text version of the bibliography, but other formats of the bibliography are available on the website for those who use reference manager software (e.g. Zotero, EndNote, or Mendeley), and a Zotero Group is used to make additions and changes to the bibliography. A PDF Collection of selected entries is available for members of the Rift Valley Network only, and release notes are made available for each release. For comments or questions related to this bibliography, please send an email to [email protected]. 1 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in African Linguistics Volume 31, Numbers 1/2,2002
    Studies in African Linguistics Volume 31, Numbers 1/2,2002 DERIVATIONAL PROCESSES IN RANGI Oliver Stegen SIL The main object of research described in this paper is Rangi, a scarcely investi­ gated Bantu language of Northern Central Tanzania. Rangi phonology and morphonology are briefly sketched, including a classification with regard to both Vowel Height Harmony and Advanced Tongue Root activity. The main body of the paper consists of a detailed description of Rangi derivational processes, which follows the pattern established in Maganga and Schadeberg's description of Nyamwezi, a closely related language. Both verbal derivation, which exclusively uses the extensional slot of the verb structure, and nominal derivation, which employs noun class prefixes and a few suffixes, are covered. 1. Introduction It is no secret that despite decades of thorough linguistic work on Bantu languages, there are still a great many descriptive gaps. The aim of this paper is to address one such gap explicitly mentioned in the literature: "little public information is available on Langi" [Nurse 1999:11]. Rangi1 is a North-Eastern Bantu language, classified as F.33 [Guthrie 1967-7111:48], spoken by 310,000 people [Grimes 2000] in the Kondoa District of Northern Central Tanzania. The data on which the observations reported herein are based was collected during the 1 While the self-referent of the language is KIla:I]gi, it is usually called Rangi in both English and Swahili. As this paper is written in English, the language will be refered to as Rangi throughout. 130 Studies in African Linguistics 31 (112), 2002 author's stay in Rangi-speaking country.2 Of course, any language description has to be selective, and this one is no exception.
    [Show full text]
  • Vidunda (G38) As an Endangered Language?
    Vidunda (G38) as an Endangered Language? Karsten Legère University of Gothenburg 1. The position of Swahili and other Tanzanian languages Tanzania is a multi-ethnic and, as a consequence, multi-lingual country. This fact is reflected in the existence of approximately 120 ethnonyms according to the 1967 population census (Tanzania 1971). The most recent edition of Ethnologue (Gordon 2005) lists 128 languages (of which one is extinct) and glossonyms accordingly. This number recently grew even bigger when the results of a country-wide survey under the auspices of LoT1 were released (LoT 2006). Thus, the survey added approximately 80 more glossonyms to the existing lists published by, for example, Polomé & Hill (1980) and Ethnologue. As known, many glossonyms refer to language varieties which are mutually intelligible with those spoken mainly by neighboring ethnic groups or nationalities. People who claim to speak a language of their own frequently understand that of their neighbors, although the latter’s variety is terminologically distinct from the former.2 Hence, the high number of glossonyms is linguistically not relevant for adequately describing the factual situation, which is often characterized by a dialect continuum. In other words, dialect clusters which are comprised of “languages” (as expressed by particular glossonyms) may definitely reduce the number of Tanzanian languages. However, to which number a necessary linguistic and terminological recategorization may ultimately lead is still an open question. The informal and formal spread of Swahili (henceforth called L2) as a language of wider distribution/lingua franca (the national and co-official3 language; see Legère 2006b for discussion) has increasingly limited the use of all other Tanzanian languages (henceforth referred to as L1s).
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. In quest of a vernacular writing style for the Rangi of Tanzania: Assumptions, processes, challenges Oliver Stegen For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2011 Abstract Despite increased efforts by linguists and educationalists to facilitate literacy and literature development in minority languages, there are still many languages worldwide which do not have a written form. One area that needs attention in literature production for a newly written language is the question of writing style. As the features of good style are language-specific, writing style guidelines have to be developed for each language anew. It has been assumed that such vernacular writing style develops predominantly by mother tongue speaker intuition. However, very few studies have been carried out to verify this. This research is set within the confines of the literacy project in the Rangi language of Northern Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section K
    K., Rupert (Fictitious character) K-TEA (Achievement test) Kʻa-la-kʻun-lun kung lu (China and Pakistan) USE Rupert (Fictitious character : Laporte) USE Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement USE Karakoram Highway (China and Pakistan) K-4 PRR 1361 (Steam locomotive) K-theory Ka Lae o Kilauea (Hawaii) USE 1361 K4 (Steam locomotive) [QA612.33] USE Kilauea Point (Hawaii) K-9 (Fictitious character) (Not Subd Geog) BT Algebraic topology Ka Lang (Vietnamese people) UF K-Nine (Fictitious character) Homology theory USE Giẻ Triêng (Vietnamese people) K9 (Fictitious character) NT Whitehead groups Ka nanʻʺ (Burmese people) (May Subd Geog) K 37 (Military aircraft) K. Tzetnik Award in Holocaust Literature [DS528.2.K2] USE Junkers K 37 (Military aircraft) UF Ka-Tzetnik Award UF Ka tūʺ (Burmese people) K 98 k (Rifle) Peras Ḳ. Tseṭniḳ BT Ethnology—Burma USE Mauser K98k rifle Peras Ḳatseṭniḳ ʾKa nao dialect (May Subd Geog) K.A.L. Flight 007 Incident, 1983 BT Literary prizes—Israel BT China—Languages USE Korean Air Lines Incident, 1983 K2 (Pakistan : Mountain) Hmong language K.A. Lind Honorary Award UF Dapsang (Pakistan) Ka nō (Burmese people) USE Moderna museets vänners skulpturpris Godwin Austen, Mount (Pakistan) USE Tha noʹ (Burmese people) K.A. Linds hederspris Gogir Feng (Pakistan) Ka Rang (Southeast Asian people) USE Moderna museets vänners skulpturpris Mount Godwin Austen (Pakistan) USE Sedang (Southeast Asian people) K-ABC (Intelligence test) BT Mountains—Pakistan Kā Roimata o Hine Hukatere (N.Z.) USE Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children Karakoram Range USE Franz Josef Glacier/Kā Roimata o Hine K-B Bridge (Palau) K2 (Drug) Hukatere (N.Z.) USE Koro-Babeldaod Bridge (Palau) USE Synthetic marijuana Ka-taw K-BIT (Intelligence test) K3 (Pakistan and China : Mountain) USE Takraw USE Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test USE Broad Peak (Pakistan and China) Ka Tawng Luang (Southeast Asian people) K.
    [Show full text]
  • Swahili-English Dictionary, the First New Lexical Work for English Speakers
    S W AHILI-E N GLISH DICTIONARY Charles W. Rechenbach Assisted by Angelica Wanjinu Gesuga Leslie R. Leinone Harold M. Onyango Josiah Florence G. Kuipers Bureau of Special Research in Modern Languages The Catholic University of Americ a Prei Washington. B. C. 20017 1967 INTRODUCTION The compilers of this Swahili-English dictionary, the first new lexical work for English speakers in many years, hope that they are offering to students and translators a more reliable and certainly a more up-to-date working tool than any previously available. They trust that it will prove to be of value to libraries, researchers, scholars, and governmental and commercial agencies alike, whose in- terests and concerns will benefit from a better understanding and closer communication with peoples of Africa. The Swahili language (Kisuiahili) is a Bantu language spoken by perhaps as many as forty mil- lion people throughout a large part of East and Central Africa. It is, however, a native or 'first' lan- guage only in a nnitp restricted area consisting of the islands of Zanzibar and Pemba and the oppo- site coast, roughly from Dar es Salaam to Mombasa, Outside this relatively small territory, elsewhere in Kenya, in Tanzania (formerly Tanganyika), Copyright © 1968 and to a lesser degree in Uganda, in the Republic of the Congo, and in other fringe regions hard to delimit, Swahili is a lingua franca of long standing, a 'second' (or 'third' or 'fourth') language enjoy- ing a reasonably well accepted status as a supra-tribal or supra-regional medium of communication. THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.1
    Griscom, Richard, and Andrew Harvey. 2019. Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.1. Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.1 November 1st, 2019 1 Introduction This document is a bibliography of the languages of the Rift Valley Area of Tanzania, which is home to dozens of distinctive ethnic groups and languages. Uniquely, it is the meeting place of languages from three of the largest language families in Africa—Nilo-Saharan, Niger-Congo, and Afro-Asiatic—as well as Sandawe, a language with possible affinity with the so-called 'Khoisan' group, and Hadza, a language isolate, which means that it is not known to be related to any other languages currently spoken. The Rift Valley Bibliography is compiled by members of the Rift Valley Network and is hosted on the network website at the Rift Valley Bibliography page. This is a text version of the bibliography, but other formats of the bibliography are available on the website for those who use reference manager software (e.g. Zotero, EndNote, or Mendeley), and a Zotero Group is used to make additions and changes to the bibliography. A PDF Collection of selected entries is available for members of the Rift Valley Network only. For comments or questions related to this bibliography, please send an email to [email protected]. 1 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................1 2 Table of Contents....................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.1
    Griscom, Richard, and Andrew Harvey (eds.). 2019. Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.1. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3524860 Rift Valley Bibliography Version 1.1 November 1st, 2019 1 Introduction This document is a bibliography of the languages of the Rift Valley Area of Tanzania, which is home to dozens of distinctive ethnic groups and languages. Uniquely, it is the meeting place of languages from three of the largest language families in Africa—Nilo-Saharan, Niger-Congo, and Afro-Asiatic—as well as Sandawe, a language with possible affinity with the so-called 'Khoisan' group, and Hadza, a language isolate, which means that it is not known to be related to any other languages currently spoken. The Rift Valley Bibliography is compiled by members of the Rift Valley Network and is hosted on the network website at the Rift Valley Bibliography page. This is a text version of the bibliography, but other formats of the bibliography are available on the website for those who use reference manager software (e.g. Zotero, EndNote, or Mendeley), and a Zotero Group is used to make additions and changes to the bibliography. A PDF Collection of selected entries is available for members of the Rift Valley Network only. For comments or questions related to this bibliography, please send an email to [email protected]. 1 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................1 2 Table of Contents....................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Why Rangi Christians Continue to Practice African Traditional Religion
    GIALens. (2008):3. <http://www.gial.edu/GIALens/issues.htm> Why Rangi Christians Continue to Practice African Traditional Religion BY RICHARD COX, M.A. SIL Uganda/Tanzania Introduction The Uganda/Tanzania Branch of SIL conducts an orientation course for new members coming to work in East Africa. One of the components of the course is a scheduled lecture about African Traditional Religion (ATR). In 2006, ten expatriates attended the course. There were also five Tanzanian nationals present. The Tanzanians fulfilled various roles such as interpreters, Swahili language teachers and cultural guides. I was asked by the branch administrators to present a lecture concerning ATR. During the course of the lecture, I emphasized the fact that most Tanzanian Christians were still involved at some level in ATR. After mentioning some of the ATR practices I was aware of, I asked the Tanzanians if they could verify my assertions. One of the Swahili language teachers, a man in is mid-thirties, stated that my assertions were true. Then to everyone’s surprise, he stated that after returning to his home village the previous year for the first time after being in the capital city for more than ten years, he and his relatives sacrificed a goat to the ancestral spirits. Why did the young man admit this and feel that, even though he was a Christian, it was necessary to make such a sacrifice? Likewise, such practices are conducted in the Tanzanian village of Haubi. Haubi is a Rangi village comprised of more than 90% Roman Catholic Christians. In the Haubi highlands, there is a forest of very large trees which can not be cut down and within which no one is permitted to live.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Grammar of the South African Bantu Language, Comprising Those of Zanzibar, Mozambique, the Zambesi, Kafirland
    A COMPARATIYE GRAMMAR OF THE SOUIH-AfRICAN BANIU LANGUAGES f^SlOBi-o.-Klway BOUGHT WITH THE INCO FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT THE GIFT OF m^nv^ M. Sage r89i f 1924 077 077 612 -3j 3^. no paDE^d ajtsJ iHQ\f nosjad ana hbih ajoin :o /907 ;Cq papaan sapog pa^tiEM jfx'aanasqB s,j3 -iiojjoq Snunp njn;aj nam joj apem s^nam -a3uBJiB JO 'X!jBaq;i aqi 0} paujtuaj aq Pinoqs . - spouad ssaaaj Saunp/U t\ I' jT^HjiHr*''* ^on sifoog papaan ^ •sjaqio jCq papaan ^on, sj 3iooq B H3IIM. 'saSaj .-TAud iBMauaj q^M*. 's>[aaM. oM% zo} samn -^6a 3Ag paMojiB aJB BJaMojjoq pajirajl •a^Bin aq ' • pin6qs ^sanbaj lEiaads , B s3[aaM OAv; pno/Caq papaan naqM '. a^qtssod _ SB igoos SB panan^aj aq pjnoqs japBJBqo x^-ia -naS B JO siBOipouad; ' -sja^oj -joq lie o| S5[aa4i jnoj 01 paiimii ajB qajBas .31 JO nofionjisni joj asn nt ^on sqooq nv 'U3>|e^sGAiaiun|0A sm:^ u9i(Afi sm.oi|s ovep am. Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924077077612 A COMPARATIVE GRAMMAR OF THE SOUTH-AFRICAN BANTU LANGUAGES. ST-AUSTIN'S PRESS, DESCLfiE, DE BROUWER AND CO., BRUGKS. SOUTH-AFRICA REFERENCE MAP TO ACCOMPANY THE Comparative Grammar OF THE South -African Bantu Languages BT J.TORREND, S.J. N. B. The names -printed in red are those of the languages more particularly dealt with in this work .Non-Bantu Lan§ua§es; Wi Bantu intermixed with non- Bantu Lan^ua^es., aoi,ie[» S* -^u^ti.'ti A comparative" GRAMMAR OF THE SOUTH-AFRICAN BANTU LANGUAGES COMPRISING THOSE OF ZANZIBAR, MOZAMBIQUE, THE ZAMBEZI, KAFIRLAND, BENGUELA, ANGOLA, THE CONGO, THE OGOWE, THE CAMEROONS, THE LAKE REGION, ETC.
    [Show full text]
  • A Linguistic Description of Mbugwe with Focus on Tone and Verbal Morphology
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Linguistica Upsaliensia 20 A Linguistic Description of Mbugwe with Focus on Tone and Verbal Morphology Vera Wilhelmsen Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Ihresalen, Engelska parken Thunbergsv. 3H, Uppsala, Saturday, 2 June 2018 at 10:00 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor Maarten Mous (Leiden University). Abstract Wilhelmsen, V. 2018. A Linguistic Description of Mbugwe with Focus on Tone and Verbal Morphology. Studia Linguistica Upsaliensia 20. 262 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-513-0318-5. Mbugwe is an endangered Bantu language spoken in north central Tanzania. This PhD dissertation is a description of the Mbugwe language with a focus on tone and verbal morphology, based on the author’s fieldwork. This is the first detailed description of the language. Thus far, only a short grammatical sketch of Mbugwe has been available. Mbugwe is a tonal language with a rich verbal system. Therefore, the focus of this dissertation is on tone and verbal morphology. The dissertation also contains a brief description of the phonology of Mbugwe as well as a description of the nominal system. Mbugwe has 7 vowels; length is distinctive. There are 21 consonant phonemes, not counting the NC sequences, which are analysed as clusters in this study. Mbugwe has 17 noun classes and the adnominals that agree with the noun are described and exemplified. The tones of the language are presented in detail. Mbugwe has two tones, high and low, and the low tone is considered the default tone.
    [Show full text]