Analyzing the Myths of Simurgh and Angha (Phoenix) in Ferdowsi's

Archive of SID

Journal of Arabic Language & Literature, Vol. 11, No.1 Serial Number. 20 37

Analyzing the Myths of Simurgh and Angha (Phoenix) in Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh and Meydani’s Majm’a al-Amthal

Tahere Gholipoor Zibad1 PhD Candidate Department Arabic Language and Literature Islamic Azad University Kashmar Branch, Kashmar, Iran

Mohammad Shyganmehr Assistant Professor Department Arabic Language and Literature Islamic Azad University Kashmar Branch, Kashmar, Iran

Mohammad Jafari Assistant Professor Department Arabic Language and Literature Islamic Azad University Kashmar Branch, Kashmar, Iran

Received: 25 December 2017 Accepted: 12 September 2018

Extended Abstract 1. Introduction Myth is the evolved thinking activity of the primitive man. It is a set of interesting stories and anecdotes from the most ancient eras, full of miracles and surprises in which reality is intertwined with imagination. The word “mythology” has been repeated 9 times in Quran, in verses such as Infaal: 31. An’aam:25, etc. The myth of Angha is an example of cultural exchange between civilizations; in different nations, it is known as Simurgh, Samandal, Banu, etc. The present study is an attempt to analyze the symbols of Angha and Simurgh in Meydani’s Majm’a al-Amthal and Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh, respectively, in order to uncover the mutual dreams of both Persian and Arabic nations; their non-existence does not prevent one from recognizing the mental realities believed by mankind. In comparative mythology, special attention is paid to psychological and linguistic approaches. Certain researchers have stated that there are no mutual aspect between Simurgh and Angha. However, this study was conducted based upon the following hypotheses: 1. The origins of the symbols of Simurgh and Angha are in the ancient Persian culture and Semitic languages, respectively; 2. Mixed images and the transformation phenomenon are the causes behind the emergence of their good and evil forces; 3. Both symbols can be justified in scientific terms; 4. Collective and mutual archetypes, nature, and religious beliefs resulted in a number of shared features between the two; 5. And the environment and culture of each ethnicity are the reasons behind their differences. 2. Review of Literature There has been a number of extensive studies on Ferdowsi’s Simurgh; however, despite Majm’a al-Amthal being a reference in these studies, there has been no research on Angha.

1. Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

www.SID.ir Archive of SID

Journal of Arabic Language & Literature, Vol. 11, No.1 Serial Number. 20 38

The most important studies in this area are as follows: 1. In his paper, Qolinezhad (2011) conducted a comparative examination of Simurgh with other mythical birds, briefly mentioning Angha. 2. In his study, Hejazi (2010) attempted to recreate the myths of Simurgh and Phoenix, believing external and internal factors to be effective in the revival of both myths, without mentioning Meydani’s Angha; 3. Ajinah (1994) has pointed out various Arabic myths including Angha, regarding the bird as an equivalent for Simurk; however, no comparative aspect between Ferdowsi’s Simurgh and Meydani’s Angha was mentioned. 4. In his work, Asad-allah (2018) regarded the myths of Simurgh and Angha as substantially different without mentioning their historical archetypes and origins. To date, there has been no research on comparing Ferdowsi’s Simurgh and Meydani’s Angha. 3. Method The present study seeks to answer the following question: What are the similarities and differences between the myths of Simurgh and Angha? To this end, both myth were recreated in stages where Simurgh is present in Shahnameh via analyzing nearly 50-60 verses and comparing them with three Arabic proverbs along with three anecdotes on Angha. The study was conducted using library studies and the comparative-analytical method. It can serve as an introduction for researchers in the areas of culture, literature, and mysticism. 4. Results and Discussion A) Manifestation of Simurgh through Godlike and Evil Imagery; 1. The birth of Zaal with white hair; 2. The birth of Rostam and Zaal’s desperation; 3. Manifestation in the fifth Khan; 4. Appearance to rescue Rostam. B) Manifestation of Angha in Meydani’s Amthal; “Taarat bi-hem al-Angha”, “Halaqat bih Angha Muqribon”, and “Aeiz min Angha Muqrib” as well as anecdotes by Hanzilah bin Safqan, Khalid bin Senan al-Abasi, and Suleiman. C) Similarities between the Symbols of Simurgh and Angha; 1. Birth: it has been said, “al- Angha tatazavijon fa iza kaana fi vaqte beiadhiha yadh’haro bi-ha alam o osh-sadidon”; Ferdowsi says: Simurgh took flight after the children’s hunger. 2. Symbols of death and survival: Both birds are symbols of creatures’ deaths for the survival of nature, proof of survival, and immortality; 3. Physical power and strength: labels such as the ruler bird, the greatest of birds, etc. refer to the birds’ power, their scarcity and absence of any competitors with a variety of dimensions; 4. Life in the mountain: due to its sheer strength, the symbol of mountains such as Alborz and Qaaf as living places of Simurgh and Angha involve external or mythical realities; 5. The element of fire: fire involves aspects such as disappearance and manifestations of realities and burning in the fire which is the secret to freedom; 6. The element of physical description: both birds have mixed imageries and dissimilar structures, as a combination of human and animal. The cause behind the emergence of the forces of good and evil lie within changes of behavior and the integration of their earthly and heavenly origins; 7. Lifetime: both birds’ survival

www.SID.ir Archive of SID

Journal of Arabic Language & Literature, Vol. 11, No.1 Serial Number. 20 39

and immortality are manifested in three stages for Simurgh and the Arabic proverb, “Aezzon min Angha muqrib” for Angha; 8. Flight and ascension through heavens: Angha and Simurgh’s flights involve both mutual and different secrets and motifs; 9. Type of existence: real and imaginary existence can be considered for both. According to the scientific principles of evolution and discovered fossils, these fantastic birds were considered as real in historical foundations of ethnicities; through imagination, different ethnic groups have regarded the birds to be real; 10. Vengeance; the purpose behind vengeance is the survival of nature or the influence of spiritual and mental states. D) Differences between the Symbols of Simurgh and Angha; 1. Purpose: As the totem of Zaal household and its presence in an epic, the purpose behind Simurgh is to support and give life to Zaal family. Its purpose was to show the godlike dimension of the gods. However, the bird’s face of evil has specific reasons as well: it is the manifestation of the power of death via evil forces; 2. Language element: the conversation between Simurgh and Zaal is the very commonality between nature and culture which was not seen in Angha; 3. Form of texts: Simurgh is manifested in an epic, poetic text behind masks such as the mother, the key to secrets of the unknown, etc., while each mask made the epic process more beautiful and attractive. However, Angha is manifested in prose behind the mask of a hunting bird, the character of which became more frightening throughout the story. Subsequently, symbols of death and hope, magic, wisdom, and fury were dominant in both cultures; 4. Content: in the epic, Simurgh has a magical character and incredible powers and became the hero of an exciting body of contents. Yet, Angha in Arabic Amthal was the descriptive aspect and the hero of wisdom and edification. 5. Insights and type of action: firstly, affection, thoughts and awareness are dominant in Simurgh’s character. Nevertheless, Angha is a bird devoid of any emotions and any signs regarding the search for justice and reform. Secondly, Simurgh showed humanlike behavior and characteristics while Angha had features only in the form of a human. Third, is the awareness over the unknown; expressing Esfandiar’s vulnerability showed Simurgh’s knowledge of the unknown, holiness, and connections to the undead plant, with godlike origins. Meanwhile, Angha’s actions are driven by instincts. Fourth is the result of actions: Simurgh returns a grown child while Angha did not. 5. Conclusion Themes such as flying through skies, i.e. the ancient dream of humans, along with disappearing into horizons and bringing unknown information and the secrets to immortality are manifested in birds. The origins of symbols of Simurgh and Angha come from the ancient Persian culture (Avesta) and Semitic anecdotes in Hebrew, respectively. Ibn Muqafa’, Tabari, etc. have translated the Pahlavi Simurgh as “Angha”. Today, both words are used as synonyms in translations. Despite their different origins, there are many similarities between the two myths. Sometimes, certain symbols such as Angha appear to be secondary and insignificant; however, detailed examinations into texts show that they are used as contexts and tools to draw upon the main events. As a result, despite their individual characteristics, all humans have similar beliefs and intentions which has led to the creation of similar symbols such as

www.SID.ir Archive of SID

Journal of Arabic Language & Literature, Vol. 11, No.1 Serial Number. 20 40

Simurgh and Angha. Regardless of their non-Islamic origins, both Simurgh and Angha have influenced the culture and literature of the nations throughout history; later, religious and political affairs resulted in the mutation of their meanings, characters and increased similarities. Due to their relevance to today’s man, they are also reflected in works of contemporary poets such as Mousavi Garmaroudi, Iylia abu Madhi, etc.

Keywords: Myth, Symbol, Angha, Simurgh, Ferdowsi References (In Persian) .Mantegh al-Teir]. Corrected by M. Shafie Kadkani] ﻣ ﻨ ﻄﻖ ا ﻟ ﻄ ﻴﺮ .(Attar, F. (2009 Tehran, Iran: Sokhan. .(Bundahishn] (Translated and corrected by F. Paknejad] ﺑﻨﺪﻫ ﺸﻦ .(Bayer, M. (2005 Tehran, Iran: Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia. .Dehkhoda dictionary]. Tehran: Rozaneh]ﻟﻐﺖ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ .(Dehkhoda, A. (1994 Pictorial] رواﺑﻂ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮي ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻬﺎي ﺳﻴﻤﺮغ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎم ادﺑﻲ آن در ﻣﻨﻄﻖ اﻟﻄﻴﺮ ﻋﻄﺎر .(Doosti, M. (2015 insightful relationship of Simorgh and its literary system with the conference of birds]. Negarineh Islamic Art, 2(6), 71-83. :Aspects of myth] (J. Sattari, Trans.). Tehran]ﭼ ﺸﻢ اﻧﺪازﻫﺎي اﺳﻄﻮره .(Eliade, M. (1993 Toos. .Shahnameh]. Vol. 5&9. Tehran, Iran: Ghatreh]ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ .(Ferdowsi, A. (1996 ﺑﺮر ﺳﻲ ﻛﻬﻦ اﻟﮕﻮي اﻧ ﺴﺎن ﻧﺨ ﺴﺘﻴﻦ و ﻧﻤﻮدﻫﺎي آن در ﺑﺨﺶ ﭘﻴ ﺸﺪادي ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺮ .(Ghaemi, F. (2013 Investigating the early human archeology and its] ﻣﺒ ﻨﺎي اﺳـــﻄﻮره ﺷـــ ﻨﺎﺳـــﻲ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ representative in Pishdadi part of Shahnameh based on analytical mythology]. The Journal of Mytho-Mystic Literature, 9(31), 1105-131. ,Persian mythology] (M. H. Bajelan Farrokhi] ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ا ﺳﺎﻃﻴﺮ اﻳﺮان .(Hinnells, J. (2006 Trans.). Tehran., Iran: Asatir. ﻣﺮغ ﺷُﻮ در ﺑﺎورﻫﺎي ﻛﻬﻦ ﻣﺮدم ﺟﻨﻮب .(Jafari Qariyeh, O., & Amadi Zādehkohan, F. (2017 -Morqe-Sho in the beliefs of south Kerman’s people]. The Journal of Mytho] ﻛﺮﻣﺎن Mystic Literature, 13(46), 11-46. Kazazi, M. J. (2001). []. Tehran, Iran: Nashr Markaz. ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ ﻧﻤﺎد ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺳﻴﻤﺮغ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺷﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺮدوﺳﻲ و ﻣﻨﻄﻖ .(Khazaie, M., & Farpour, F. (2004 The symbol of Simorgh with emphasis on Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh and] اﻟﻄﻴﺮ ﻋﻄﺎر Attar’s Mantegh Tair]. Honar va Mardom (Art and People), 20, 4-14. [Le symbolisme des legendes]زﺑﺎن رﻣﺰي ﻗ ﺼﻪ ﻫﺎي ﭘﺮﻳﻮار .(Loffler-Delachaus, M. (1977 (J. Sattari, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Toos. Madan, D. M. (1911). Pahlavi Dinkard. Bombay, India: Mcnasce.

www.SID.ir Archive of SID

Journal of Arabic Language & Literature, Vol. 11, No.1 Serial Number. 20 41

Simorgh and its role in Iran’s] ﺳــﻴﻤﺮغ و ﻧﻘﺶ آن در ﻋﺮﻓﺎن اﻳﺮان .(Mashkour, M. J. (1986 mysticism]. Honar va Mardom (Art and People), 15(177&178). Retrieved from https://www.cgie.org.ir/fa/news/115661 ;The myth of Zal]اﺳـــﻄﻮره زال ﺗﺒﻠﻮر ﺗﻀـــﺎد و وﺣﺪت در ﺣﻤﺎﺳـــﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ .(Mokhtari, M. (2000 contradiction and unity in the national epic]. Tehran, Iran: Toos. Remarkable myths in] اﺳﻄﻮره ﻫﺎي ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ در ﺷﻌﺮ ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﻮﻫﺎب اﻟﺒﻴﺎﺗﻲ .(Najafi Ivaki, A. (2010 the poems of Abd al Wahab al-Bayati]. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 2, 1-26. .Four theses] (M. Sanaie, Trans.). Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi]ﭼﻬﺎر رﺳﺎﻟﻪ .(Plato. (1983 ,Configuration in Mythology]. Tehran]ﭘﻴﻜﺮﮔﺮداﻧﻲ در اﺳﺎﻃﻴﺮ .(Rastgar Fasaie, M. (2004 Iran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. :Gradualism] (M. Behzad, Trans.). Tehran, Iran]ﺗﻜــﺎﻣــﻞ .(Rhodes, F. H. T. (1997 National Association of Protecting Natural Resources and Environment. Translating the]ﺑﺮﮔﺮدان رواﻳﺖ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ داﺳـــﺘﺎﻧﻬﺎ و ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻬﺎي ﺷـــﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺮدوﺳـــﻲ .(Riazi, M. (2004 narrative of Ferdowsi's Shahnameh stories and messages]. Tehran, Iran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. Comparative mythology in] اﺳﻄﻮره ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻲ درﺳﻨﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻏﺮب .(Sanepour, m. (2011 the western cultural tradition]. Qarbshenasi-Ye Bonyadi (Occidental Studies), 2(1), 25-38. .[An entry on mystical rheumatology]ﻣﺪﺧﻠﻲ ﺑﺮ رﻣﺰﺷـــﻨﺎﺳـــﻲ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻲ .(Sattari, J. (1972 Tehran, Iran: Markaz. .Dictionary of signs]. Tehran, Iran: Mitra]ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ اﺷﺎرات .(Shamisa, A. (2009 :Dictionary of signs]. Tehran, Iran]ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻧﻤﺎدﻫﺎ .(Showalieh, J., & Gariran, A. (2006 Jeihoun. Encyclopedia of myths and]ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ا ﺳﺎﻃﻴﺮ و ا ﺷﺎرات در ادﺑﻴﺎت ﻓﺎر ﺳﻲ .(Yahaghi, J. (1996 signs in Persian literature]. Tehran, Iran: Soroush. References (In Arabic) Arab myths of Jahili Arabs and its] اﻻﺳـــــﺎﻃﲑ اﻟﻌﺮب ﻋﻠﯽ اﳉﺎﻫﻠﻴﻪ و دﻻﻟﺘﻬﺎ .(Ajineh, M. (1994 significance]. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Farabi. ,Interpretation of Diwan of Motanabi]. Beirut] ﺷـــــــﺮح دﻳﻮان اﳌﺘﻨﺒﯽ .(Al-Akbari, A. (2010 Lebanon: Dar al- Marifa. .[Myth in modern Arabic poems] ا ﻻ ﺳﻄ ﻮرة ﻓﯽ اﻟﺸﻌﺮ اﻟﻌﺮﺑﯽ اﳊﺪﻳﺚ .(Al-Davoud, A. A. (1992 Cairo, Egypt: Dar al-Maref. The end of creativity in the tecjniques] ﺎﻳﺖ اﻻرب ﻓﯽ اﻟﻔﻨﻮن اﻻدب .(Al-Nowairi, Sh. (1985 of literature]. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Torath Research Center.

www.SID.ir Archive of SID

Journal of Arabic Language & Literature, Vol. 11, No.1 Serial Number. 20 42

,The story of prophets]. Beirut] ﻗﺼـــــــــﺺ اﻻﻧﺒﻴﺎء .(Al-Salabi al-Neisabouri, A. A. (2006 Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiya. The mirror of heaven and the lesson of] ﻣﺮآة اﳉﻨﺎن و ﻋﱪة اﻟﻴﻘﻈﺎن .(Al-Yafeie, A. A. (1970 wachfulness]. Beirut, Lebanon: Mo’asisa al-Alami lil-Matbu’at. :The life of the Great animal]. Beirut, Lebanon] ﺣﻴﺎة اﳊﻴﻮان اﻟﮑﱪی .(Damiri, A. A. (2006 Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiya. Mythological heritage] اﳌﻮروث ا ﻻ ﺳ ﻄ ﻮری ﻓﯽ اﻻدب اﻟﻌﺮﺑﯽ اﳊﺪﻳﺚ واﻻدب اﳌﻘﺎرن .(Hanun, A. (2017 in modern Arabic literature and comparative literature]. 11, 180-209. Injury in distinguishing] اﻹﺻـــــــــــــــــــﺎﺑـــــﺔ ﰲ ﲤﻴﻴﺰ اﻟﺼـــــــــــــــﺤـــــﺎﺑـــــﺔ .(Ibn Hajar Asghalani, A. (1995 companions]. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiya. .Vafayat al-Ayan]. Beirut: Da al-Sadir] وﻓﻴﺎت اﻷﻋﻴﺎن .(Ibn Khollakan, (2000 .Arab’s lnguage]. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Toras al-Arabi] ﻟﺴﺎن اﻟﻌﺮب .(Ibn Manzur. (1990 ,The collection of examples]. Beirut] ﳎﻤﻊ اﻻﻣﺜــــــﺎل .(Meidani Neishabouri, A. (1996 Lebanon: Dar al-Jil. .(.Unique of literature] (A. Shahed, Trans] ﻓﺮاﺋﺪ اﻻدب .(Meidani Neishabouri, A. (2000 Esfahan, Iran: Jahad Daneshgahi. Legendary tendency in] ا ﻟ ﻨ ﺰوع اﻻﺳــــــــــــــــﻄﻮری ﻓﯽ اﻟﺮواﻳــــــــﺔ اﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴــــــــﻪ اﳌﻌــــــــﺎﺻــــــــــــــــﺮ .(Nazzal, S. (2001 contemporary Arabic narration]. Damascus, Iran: Etehad al-Ketab al-Arab. Aphorisms of the biographies of] ﻏﺮر اﻟﺴـــــــﲑ اﺧﺒﺎر اﳌﻠﻮک اﻟﻔﺮس و ﺳـــــــﲑﻫﻢ .(Saalebi, A. (1989 the Persian kings and their trajectories] (M. Fazaeli, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Noghreh. .[Simorgh in Iranian culture] ﺳ ﻴ ﻤ ﺮغ در ﻗﻠﻤﺮو ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ اﻳﺮان .(Soltani Gardfaramarzi, A. (1993 Tehran, Iran: Mobtakeran. The comprehensive commentary on] ﺟـــﺎﻣﻊ اﻟﺒﻴـــﺎن ﻓﯽ اﻟﺘﻔﺴـــــــــــــــﲑاﻟﻘﺮآن .(Tabari, A. J. (1992 Quran]. The investigative in the examples] اﳌﺴـــــﺘﻘﺼـــــﻰ ﰲ أﻣﺜﺎل اﻟﻌﺮب .(Zamakhshari, A. M. (1987 of Arabs].Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Maktaba al-Ilmia. The spring of the righteous and] رﺑﻴﻊ اﻷﺑﺮار و ﻧﺼـــــﻮص اﻷﺧﺒﺎر .(Zamakhshari, A. M. (1992 the news texts]. Beirut, Lebanon: Mo’asisa al-Alami lil-Matbu’at.