DOCSLIB.ORG

Developing Achievement Levels on the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress in Grades 8 and 12 Writing Process Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Developing Achievement Levels on the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress in Grades 8 and 12 Writing Process Report National Assessment Governing Board Developing Achievement Levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress in Writing Grades 8 and 12 in 2011 Submitted to: National Assessment Governing Board 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 825 Washington, DC 02002-4233 Phone: 202.357.6938 This study was funded by the National Assessment Governing Board under Contract ED-NAG-10-C-0003. Submitted by: Measured Progress 100 Education Way Dover, NH 03820 Phone: 603.749.9102 ALS Writing Process Report September 2012 PANELIST NAMES REDACTED BY GOVERNING BOARD Developing Achievement Levels on the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress in Grades 8 and 12 Writing Process Report Luz Bay with Chris Clough Jennifer Dunn Wonsuk Kim Leah McGuire Tia Sukin September 2012 ALS Writing Process Report Measured Progress ii National Assessment Governing Board BOARD MEMBERSHIP (2011–2012) Honorable David P. Driscoll, Chair Former Commissioner of Education Melrose, Massachusetts Mary Frances Taymans, SND, Vice Chair Sisters of Notre Dame National Education Office Bethesda, Maryland Andrés Alonso Shannon Garrison Chief Executive Officer Fourth-Grade Teacher Baltimore City Public Schools Solano Avenue Elementary School Baltimore, Maryland Los Angeles, California David J. Alukonis Doris R. Hicks Former Chairman Principal and Chief Executive Officer Hudson School Board Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Charter School Hudson, New Hampshire for Science and Technology New Orleans, Louisiana Louis M. Fabrizio Data, Research and Federal Policy Director Honorable Terry Holliday North Carolina Department of Public Commissioner of Education Instruction Kentucky Department of Education Raleigh, North Carolina Lexington, Kentucky Honorable Anitere Flores Richard Brent Houston Senator Principal Florida State Senate Shawnee Middle School Miami, Florida Shawnee, Oklahoma Alan J. Friedman Hector Ibarra Consultant Eighth-Grade Teacher Museum Development and Science Belin Blank International Center and Talent Communication Development New York, New York Iowa City, Iowa ALS Writing Process Report Measured Progress iii National Assessment Governing Board BOARD MEMBERSHIP (2011–2012) Honorable Tom Luna B. Fielding Rolston Idaho Superintendent of Public Instruction Chairman Boise, Idaho Tennessee State Board of Education Kingsport, Tennessee Honorable Jack Markell Governor of Delaware Cary Sneider Wilmington, Delaware Associate Research Professor Portland State University Tonya Miles Portland, Oregon General Public Representative Mitchellville, Maryland Blair Taylor President and Chief Executive Officer Dale Nowlin Los Angeles Urban League Twelfth-Grade Teacher Los Angeles, California Columbus North High School Columbus, Indiana Honorable Leticia Van de Putte Senator Honorable Sonny Perdue Texas State Senate Former Governor of Georgia San Antonio, Texas Atlanta, Georgia Eileen L. Weiser Susan Pimentel General Public Representative Educational Consultant Ann Arbor, Michigan Hanover, New Hampshire Ex-officio Member W. James Popham John Q. Easton Professor Emeritus Director University of California, Los Angeles Institute of Education Sciences Wilsonville, Oregon U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC Andrew C. Porter Dean Graduate School of Education University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ALS Writing Process Report Measured Progress iv Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. xii Chapter 1— Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Governing Board and the NAEP Achievement Levels for Writing ........................................... 2 1.2 Purpose of This Document .............................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Organization of This Document ...................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2— Project Overview .................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Technical Advisory Committee on Standard Setting ...................................................................... 8 2.2 Technical Assistance from the NAEP Alliance .............................................................................. 10 2.3 Project Staff .................................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Achievement Levels–Setting Staff ................................................................................................. 12 2.4.1 Process Facilitators ................................................................................................................. 13 2.4.2 Content Facilitators ................................................................................................................ 14 2.5 Panelist Nomination and Selection ................................................................................................ 14 2.5.1 Multistage Selection Process ................................................................................................... 15 2.5.1.1 Stage 1: Select Districts and Identify Nominators ......................................................... 15 2.5.1.2 Stage 2: Contact Nominators and Request Nominations ............................................ 20 2.5.1.3 Stage 3: Notify Nominees and Request Acceptance of Nomination .............................21 2.5.1.4 Stage 4: Select and Recruit Panelists ............................................................................ 25 2.5.2 Recruitment for Field Trial.................................................................................................... 30 2.5.3 Recruitment for Field Trial 2 ................................................................................................. 32 2.6 Advanced Materials ....................................................................................................................... 32 2.6.1 Advanced Materials for Pilot Study ....................................................................................... 33 2.6.2 Advanced Materials for Field Trial 2 ..................................................................................... 34 2.6.3 Advanced Materials for Operational ALS Meeting ............................................................... 34 2.7 Incentives and Reimbursements ................................................................................................... 36 2.7.1 Incentives and Reimbursements for Pilot Study ................................................................... 37 2.7.2 Incentives and Reimbursements for Field Trial 2 ................................................................. 37 2.7.3 Incentives and Reimbursements for Operational ALS Meeting ........................................... 38 2.8 Registration ................................................................................................................................... 38 2.8.1 Registration for the Pilot Study ............................................................................................. 39 2.8.2 Registration for Field Trial 2 ................................................................................................. 39 2.8.3 Registration for Operational ALS Meeting ........................................................................... 39 2.9 Achievement Levels–Setting Process ............................................................................................ 40 2.9.1 Development of Achievement Levels Descriptions ............................................................... 40 2.9.2 Body of Work Method ............................................................................................................ 48 2.9.3 Body of Work Technological Integration and Enhancements .............................................. 52 2.9.4 Replicate Panels ..................................................................................................................... 56 2.9.5 Task Pool Division ................................................................................................................. 60 2.9.6 Pseudo-NAEP Scales ............................................................................................................. 63 2.9.7 Facilitator Training ................................................................................................................ 63 2.9.8 Panelist Training.................................................................................................................... 67 2.9.8.1 General Orientation ....................................................................................................... 68 2.9.8.2 Taking a NAEP Exam .................................................................................................... 68 ALS Writing Process Report Measured Progress v 2.9.8.3 Review of Writing Tasks and Scoring Rubrics ............................................................ 70 2.9.8.4 Orientation to the Method .............................................................................................. 71 2.9.8.5 Presentation of NAEP Writing Framework and Achievement Levels Descriptions .... 71 2.9.8.6 Achievement Level Training by Response Classification Exercise ...............................72
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Work Orders in Progress
    GADSDEN INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS 277 - Work Orders In Progress (Fiscal Year) Total Selected Date Range for Request Dates:7/1/2020 - 12/31/2020 Order By Location, Status Costs WOID Building Area Deferred By Until Request Date Target Comp Date Days Labor Priority Status Area Number Reason Created Date/Time Actual Comp Date Aged Hours Assigned To Description Action Taken Requester Name Location: Alta Vista ECHS 233356 7/15/2020 36 11 $649.38 Medium Work In Progress 7/15/2020 11:35:35 AM 8/20/2020 Tellez, Hector Replaced bulbs in girls restrooms and 2 fixtures did not Light fixtures need to be replaced with work needs ballast modern fixtures. T-12 light bulbs are no longer ordered or carried by warehouse. Maria Davila Please forwarded to Electrician 238220 11/19/2020 62 $0.00 Medium Work In Progress 2 11/19/2020 11:14:15 Marquez, Gerardo Part of the door mechanism fell out the door handle in P2; please reinstall. The pieces have been placed on the table in P2. Melanie Beegle 237972 11/6/2020 75 $0.00 Medium Work In Progress 12 & 14 11/6/2020 8:50:55 AM Marquez, Gerardo Teacher & Administration keys do not work on the entry door lock in P12. In P14 the locking mechanism gets jammed inside the handle and won't release to securely lock the door. Melanie Beegle 233863 7/28/2020 176 $0.00 Medium Work In Progress 11 & 13 7/28/2020 2:05:26 PM Marquez, Gerardo Classroom doors for portables 11 & 13 are hard to close.
    [Show full text]
  • Chartbook on Women's Progress
    FUTURE OF WORK@50+ NOVEMBERMONTH 2015 Research Report Looking Back, Looking Ahead: Chartbook on Women’s Progress Ariane Hegewisch Jeff Hayes Jessica Milli Elyse Shaw Heidi Hartmann Institute for Women’s Policy Research Acknowledgments We would like to thank the following members of the AARP Public Policy Institute and AARP’s Office of Policy Integration for their contributions to this paper: Lori Trawinski, Sara Rix, Donald Redfoot, Christina Fitzpatrick, Gary Koenig, Mikki Waid, Alison Shelton, and Julia Alexis. Also, we would like to thank Allison Porter for her assistance as well as an external, anonymous peer reviewer for their time and valuable contributions. AARP’s Public Policy Institute informs and stimulates public debate on the issues we face as we age. Through research, analysis, and dialogue with the About the Future of Work@50+ nation’s leading experts, PPI promotes development of sound, creative policies This report is part of the Future of Work@50+ Initiative. to address our common need for This is a multiyear initiative that examines the challenges economic security, health care, and and opportunities facing older workers. For other reports and quality of life. information, visit: http://www.aarp.org/futureofwork. The views expressed herein are for information, debate, and discussion, and do not necessarily represent official policies of AARP. LOOKING BACK, LOOKING AHEAD: CHARTBOOK ON WOMEN’S PROGRESS i Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..............................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]
  • NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress
    Institute of Education Sciences U.S. Department of Education NCES 2009–479 NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress READING 1971–2008 MATHEMATICS 1973–2008 CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Executive Summary 6 Introduction This report presents the results of the NAEP long- 8 The Long-Term Trend Assessment term trend assessments in reading and mathemat- in Reading ics, which were most recently given in the 2007–08 28 The Long-Term Trend Assessment school year to students at ages 9, 13, and 17. Nationally representative samples of over 26,000 in Mathematics public and private school students were assessed 50 Technical Notes in each subject area. 53 Appendix Tables The long-term trend assessments make it possible to chart educational progress since the early 1970s. Results in reading are available for 12 assessments going back to the rst in 1971. The rst of 11 assess- ments in mathematics was administered in 1973. What is Throughout this report, the most recent results are compared to those from 2004 and from the rst year The Nation’s the assessment was conducted. ™ Report Card ? The original assessment format, content, and proce- dures were revised somewhat in 2004 to update content The Nation’s Report Card™ informs the public about and provide accommodations to students with disabili- the academacademicic achachievementievement ooff elementarelementaryy and ties and English language learners. The knowledge and secondary students in the United StatesStates. Report skills assessed, however, remain essentially the same cards communicate the findings of the National since the rst assessment year. Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a continuing and nationally representative measure Improvements seen in reading and of achievement in various subjects over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Progress Report Reporting Period: June 2017 – November 2017
    PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT REPORTING PERIOD: JUNE 2017 – NOVEMBER 2017 SIX-MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT REPORTING PERIOD: JUNE 2017 - NOVEMBER 2017 Report Title : Six-monthly progress report Reporting period: June 2017 to November 2017 Report Status : FINAL Project Ref : WPD/EN/NIC/02 - OpenLV Date : 08.12.2017 Document Control Name Date Prepared by: R. Potter 08.12.2017 Reviewed by: D. Hollingworth/M. 08.12.2017 Dale Recommended by: D.Roberts/ R. Hey 08.12.2017 Approved (WPD): A.Sleightholm 08.12.2017 Revision History Date Issue Status 03.11.2017 0.1 DRAFT 08.12.2017 1.0 FINAL Page 2 of 36 SIX-MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT REPORTING PERIOD: JUNE 2017 - NOVEMBER 2017 Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Overall Project Progress ............................................................................................... 6 1.2 Business Case ............................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Project Learning and Dissemination ............................................................................ 6 1.4 Risks .............................................................................................................................. 7 2 Project Manager’s Report ...................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Project Background .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Achievement Levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress for Writing Grades 8 and 12 in 2011 and Grade 4 in 2013
    National Assessment Governing Board Developing Achievement Levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress for Writing Grades 8 and 12 in 2011 and Grade 4 in 2013 Submitted to: Dr. Susan Loomis National Assessment Governing Board 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 825 Washington, DC 20002-4233 Email: [email protected] Phone: 202.357.6940 This study was funded by the National Assessment Governing Board under Contract ED-NAG-10-C-0003. Submitted by: Measured Progress 100 Education Way Dover, NH 03820 Phone: 603.749.9102 NAEP Writing ALS Design Document March 10, 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 5 Purpose of This Document ................................................................................. 5 Organization of This Document ......................................................................... 6 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 7 Body of Work ...................................................................................................... 7 BoW Technological Integration and Enhancements (BoWTIE) ..................... 10 Research Studies ..................................................................................................... 13 Field Trial .......................................................................................................... 13 Hardware ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FP2020 the ARC of PROGRESS 2019–2020 Cover Photo by Jonathan Torgovnik/ Getty Images/Images of Empowerment
    FP2020 THE ARC OF PROGRESS 2019–2020 COVER PHOTO BY Jonathan Torgovnik/ Getty Images/Images of Empowerment THE FP2020 PROGRESS REPORT IS DIGITAL THIS YEAR. The full report is online at familyplanning2020.org/progress. fp2030.org This condensed print version contains only the material facebook.com/FP2030Global our partners find most useful to have in print. It includes @FP2030Global highlights, previews of the online content, the financial #FP2030Progress report, and data analysis. Everything else is digital. FP2020 THE ARC OF PROGRESS 2019–2020 Condensed Print Version TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................ 4 SECTION 03 PARTNERSHIP ......................................... 32 SECTION 01 THE ARC OF PROGRESS ..........................10 SECTION 04 FINANCE ................................................. 36 SECTION 02 FAMILY PLANNING SECTION 05 IN THE TIME OF COVID ........................... 24 MEASUREMENT ....................................... 48 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the eight years of the FP2020 partnership, the family planning community has proven that when we work together, across borders and sectors, we can truly change the course of progress on family planning. Family Planning 2020 was launched with a simple premise: that every woman and girl, no matter where she lives, should have the opportunity to use lifesaving, life-changing modern contraception. The leaders who gathered at the London Summit in 2012 agreed on an ambitious goal and a tight timeframe for achieving it: to reach an additional 120 million users of modern contraception in the world’s 69 lowest-income countries by 2020. That initial eight-year period is now drawing to a close. We didn’t reach 120 million, but we did bend the curve of progress upward. The FP2020 initiative has become a movement, with more than 130 governments, foundations, multilaterals, civil society organizations, youth-led organizations, and private sector partners all collaborating to advance rights- based family planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Date Not Set Report Created On
    MT2 Date not set Report Created On: Jun 15, 2020 Page 1 5 21 85 Goal Strategy Tactic Overall Summary % Status Pending 50.59 On Track 17.65 Upcoming 1.18 Status 35% Discontinued 1.18 Progress Completed 29.41 0 100 Report Legend No Update Overdue # Priority Page 2 Goal 1 Progress 34% Improve Customer Service through Convenient Access % # Status Pending 50.0 9 Owner: Mandy Carrico On Track 16.67 3 Upcoming 5.56 1 Discontinued 5.56 1 Strategy: 3 Tactic: 18 Completed 22.22 4 Update provided by Mandy Carrico on Jan 27, 2020 14:57:09 • Loosened access restrictions to PC cards. • Instituted unlimited PC time renewals. • Created visitor library card. Strategy 1.1 Progress 75% Assess and implement library policies and procedures through action oriented, measurable initiatives to % # ensure the support of customer convenience and access. On Track 33.33 2 Upcoming 16.67 1 Discontinued 16.67 1 Owner: Mandy Carrico Completed 33.33 2 Tactic: 6 Tactic 1.1.1 Update provided by Amy Herring on May 12, 2020 20:23:12 Ongoing - Mar 30, 2020 Completed Progress 100% Active on-line April 2020 • Implement on-line library card renewal. (FY 19/20) Owner: Mandy Carrico Tactic 1.1.2 Update provided by Amy Herring on May 12, 2020 20:23:56 Ongoing - Jun 30, 2022 Completed Progress 100% Library Card renewals are now available online April 2020 • Explore library card policies and incorporate changes to achieve convenience while abiding by City guidelines. Owner: Mandy Carrico Page 3 Tactic 1.1.3 Update provided by Amy Herring on May 12, 2020 20:39:18 Jul 01, 2019 - Jun 30, 2022 Discontinued Status updated to "Discontinued" Evaluate auto renewal implications to decide on implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Almaz, Salyut, And
    Part 2 Almaz/Salyut/Mir largely concerned with assembly in 12, 1964, Chelomei called upon his Part 2 Earth orbit of a vehicle for circumlu- staff to develop a military station for Almaz, Salyut, nar flight, but also described a small two to three cosmonauts, with a station made up of independently design life of 1 to 2 years. They and Mir launched modules. Three cosmo- designed an integrated system: a nauts were to reach the station single-launch space station dubbed aboard a manned transport spacecraft Almaz (“diamond”) and a Transport called Siber (or Sever) (“north”), Logistics Spacecraft (Russian 2.1 Overview shown in figure 2-2. They would acronym TKS) for reaching it (see live in a habitation module and section 3.3). Chelomei’s three-stage Figure 2-1 is a space station family observe Earth from a “science- Proton booster would launch them tree depicting the evolutionary package” module. Korolev’s Vostok both. Almaz was to be equipped relationships described in this rocket (a converted ICBM) was with a crew capsule, radar remote- section. tapped to launch both Siber and the sensing apparatus for imaging the station modules. In 1965, Korolev Earth’s surface, cameras, two reentry 2.1.1 Early Concepts (1903, proposed a 90-ton space station to be capsules for returning data to Earth, 1962) launched by the N-1 rocket. It was and an antiaircraft cannon to defend to have had a docking module with against American attack.5 An ports for four Soyuz spacecraft.2, 3 interdepartmental commission The space station concept is very old approved the system in 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 3 Slide Handouts
    Pathways of Progress­­™ Module 3: The Logic Behind Pathways of Progress TM Three Guiding Principles in Establishing Pathways of Progress Matter Individual Student Learning Goals • We know that the level of skills for a student at the Meaningful. beginning of the year is an important predictor of their – Goals should support students to achieve meaningful outcomes or increase the likelihood of achieving meaningful and important end of year outcome (partial eta squared = 71%). outcomes. • Pathways of Progress contributes to initial skills in Ambitious. predicting later outcomes (partial eta squared = 17%). – Above typical or well above typical progress are ambitious goals. – Typical progress may be sufficient for students who are at or above benchmark – Typical progress may not be adequate for students who are likely to need additional support to achieve benchmark goals. – Below typical or well below typical progress are just not very ambitious. Attainable. – High in the well above typical range is probably not attainable. – Typical and above typical progress is readily attainable. – Well below typical and below typical progress may be attainable, but are not ambitious or meaningful. Pathways of ProgressTM ©2015 Dynamic Measurement Group 33 Pathways of ProgressTM ©2015 Dynamic Measurement Group 34 Considerations in Establishing Considerations in Establishing Student Learning Goals Student Learning Goals DIBELS Next informed considerations: Other considerations: What rate of progress is above typical progress What rate of progress is possible with a very compared to other students with similar initial skills? effective, research based intervention? What rate of progress is necessary to narrow the What resources are available to support instruction achievement gap with students making adequate and intervention? progress? What is the student attendance pattern? What rate of progress is necessary to achieve important benchmark goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Progress Index 2017
    SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX 2017 BY MICHAEL E. PORTER AND SCOTT STERN SOCIAL WITH MICHAEL GREEN PROGRESS IMPERATIVE SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX 2017 CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 / Why We Measure Social Progress 10 Chapter 2 / How We Measure Social Progress 14 Chapter 3 / 2017 Social Progress Index Results 22 Chapter 4 / Global Trends in Social Progress, 2014–2017 39 Supplemental Section / From Index to Action to Impact 55 Appendix A / Definitions and Data Sources 68 Appendix B / 2017 Social Progress Index Full Results 74 Appendix C / Social Progress Index vs Log of GDP Per Capita 79 Appendix D / Country Scorecard Summary 80 Acknowledgments 84 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2017 SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX Social progress has become an increasingly critical on average, personal security is no better in middle- agenda for leaders in government, business, and income countries than low-income ones, and is often civil society. Citizens’ demands for better lives are worse. Too many people — regardless of income — evident in uprisings such as the Arab Spring and the live without full rights and experience discrimination emergence of new political movements in even the or even violence based on gender, religion, ethnicity, most prosperous countries, such as the United States or sexual orientation. and France. Since the financial crisis of 2008, citizens are increasingly expecting that business play its role Traditional measures of national income, such as in delivering improvements in the lives of customers GDP per capita, fail to capture the overall progress of and employees, and protecting the environment for societies. us all. This is the social progress imperative.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress 6 Spaces Progress 6 Spaces. Progress 4 Spaces
    ds You did not reduce your cholesterol by There it is — you’re smoking cigarettes 30%, now the doctor is getting stern: again and the pain in your chest she gave you a prescription for 2 indicates you have damaged your ocar medications but you never filled the coronary arteries! her prescription. t 2 2 A 2 Progress 6 spaces. 1. Progress 6 spaces 2. ® ® ZONE Positively Aging /M. O. R. E. ZONE Positively Aging /M. O. R. E. 2006©The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 2006©The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio ZONE You quit smoking. Your doctor is concerned because C-reactive protein in your blood is too high, indicating that inflammation is happening somewhere in your body. In your case, it’s in the arteries leading to 2 2 your heart! 3. 4. Regress 1 space. Progress 4 spaces. ® ® ZONE Positively Aging /M. O. R. E. ZONE Positively Aging /M. O. R. E. 2006©The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 2006©The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio You like to eat fries and burgers in If you are male, spite of the high sodium and cholesterol; so again, you abandon Progress 6 spaces. your healthy eating plan. If you are female, 2 2 5. Do Not Progress 6. Progress 3 spaces or Regress. ® ® ZONE Positively Aging /M. O. R. E. ZONE Positively Aging /M. O. R. E. 2006©The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 2006©The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Instead of taking the escalator to the Your doctor just told you your blood second floor, you decide to take the sugar is too high (again).
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Progress Report
    Quarterly Progress Report Award Information Title Award # Awardee Smart City Challenge DTFH6116H00013 City of Columbus Demonstration Report Information Date Submitted Submitted To Period Covered by Report May 18, 2017 Kate Hartman January 2017 - March 2017 Project Scope Scope Statement Implementation of the Smart Columbus Smart City Demonstration consisting of 15 projects spread across 2 enabling Technologies and 4 Districts: 1. Columbus Connected Transportation Network (CCTN) 1. Connected Vehicle Environment 2. Smart Street Lighting 3. Transit Pedestrian Collision Avoidance System 2. Integrated Data Exchange (IDE) 4. IDE 3. Residential District 5. Common Payment System 6. Multi-Modal Trip Planning Application 7. Smart Mobility Hubs 8. Mobility Assistance for People with Cognitive Disabilities 4. Commercial District 9. Connected Electric Automated Vehicles 5. Downtown District 10. Delivery Zone Availability 11. Enhanced Permit Parking 12. Event Parking Management 6. Logistics District 13. Truck Platooning 14. Oversize Vehicle Routing 15. Interstate Truck Parking Availability 1 Financial Status Task Financial Summary (See Note 1) Note 1: After last quarter’s report we agreed the City’s labor cost would all stay within Program Management. Task 3 was to be broken down by its two components and Task 4 was to be broken down by its four components. We are still working on breaking task 3 and 4 into the components and anticipate reporting expenses that way on the next quarterly report. Costs Incurred vs Budgeted Costs Costs Incurred vs Obligated Federal Funding Direct Labor Hours Worked (See Note 2) 2 Note 2: Some hours were estimated on the last quarterly report. There are no estimated hours on this report.
    [Show full text]