The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Taxable Bonds, Series 2018
This is a Preliminary Offering Memorandum subject to completion and amendment or supplement and is not yet fully adopted. Under no circumstances will the Preliminary Offering Memorandum constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the Bonds, nor will there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. expected thattheBondswillbeavailablefordelivery toDTCinNewYork,YorkonoraboutMarch27,2018. is It Massachusetts. Boston, LLP, English, & McCarter counsel, their by Underwriters the for upon passed be Procter LLP,Boston,Massachusetts,counseltothe Institution.Inaddition,certainotherlegalmatterswill Goodwin by legality of approval the conditions, closing customary other among to, subject Underwriters, the information essentialtothemakingofaninformed investmentdecision. to beasummaryofthisissue.Investorsmust readtheentireOfferingMemorandumtoobtain payment ontheBonds.See“SECURITYFOR THE BONDS”herein. indebtedness, ifissued,maybeeithersecuredorunsecuredandentitledtopayment prior to restricted bytheIndentureorotherwisefromincurringadditionalindebtedness.Such gross incomeforfederalorstatetaxpurposes.See“TAXMATTERS”herein. maturity asdescribedherein.See“THEBONDS–Redemption” “BOOK-ENTRY in ONLY SYSTEM”herein. described fully more as Bonds, the of Owners Beneficial the to disbursement subsequent defined is requiredtoremitsuchprincipalorapplicableRedemptionPriceandinteresttheDTCParticipants for (as Price Redemption or principal the DTC, by held herein) of,ifapplicable,andinterestontheBondswillbepayablebywiretransfertoDTC,which inturn are Bonds the as long So 2018. 1, September purchased. under certaincircumstancesdescribedintheIndenture)representingtheirownershipinterests Bonds $1,000 and any integral multiple thereof. Purchasers of the Bonds will not receive physical certificates (except depository fortheBonds.Individualpurchaseswillbemadeinbook-entryformonly,principalamounts of as nomineeofTheDepositoryTrustCompany,NewYork,York(“DTC”).DTCwillactsecurities thereof and,whenissued,willberegisteredunderaglobalbook-entrysysteminthenameofCede&Co., general corporatepurposesandtopaycertaincostsofissuance. other for and Institution the of projects capital certain refinance and finance to Institution the by used be will N.A., astrustee(the“Trustee”).TheproceedsfromthesaleofBonds,togetherwithotheravailablefunds, Charles StarkDraperLaboratory,Inc.(the“Institution”)andTheBankofNewYorkMellonTrustCompany, pursuant tothetermsofanIndentureTrust,datedasMarch1,2018(the“Indenture”),byandbetweenThe * † ______, 2018 Dated: DateofDelivery NEW ISSUE–BOOK-ENTRYONLY
scrte rtn i nt rcmedto t by sl o hl scrte ad a b sbet o eiin or revision Preliminary, subject tochange. to subject be may and securities hold or sell withdrawal at anytime. buy, to recommendation a not is rating securities A The BondsareofferedbytheUnderwriters,when, asandifissuedbytheInstitutionaccepted This coverpagecontainscertaininformation forquickreferenceonly.Itisnotintended The BondsconstituteunsecuredgeneralobligationsoftheInstitution.Institutionisnot Interest, Redemption Price and profit, if any, on the sale of the Bonds, are not excludable from The Bondsaresubjecttooptionalandmandatorysinkingfundredemptionpriortheirstated Interest ontheBondswillbepayableMarch1andSeptemberofeachyear,commencing on The Bondswillbeissuedinfullyregisteredformdenominationsof$1,000andanyintegralmultiple The CharlesStarkDraperLaboratory,Inc.TaxableBonds,Series2018(the“Bonds”),willbeissued PRELIMINARY OFFERING MEMORANDUM DATED MARCH 15, 2018 J.P. Morgan T he
C harles
Taxable Bonds,Series2018
S tark $65,000,000* D raper
L aboratory Due: Asshownontheinsidecoverhereof BofA MerrillLynch , I nc Rating: Moody’s:Aa3 . †
$65,000,000* The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Taxable Bonds, Series 2018
MATURITIES, AMOUNTS, RATES AND YIELDS/PRICES
Dated: Date of Delivery Due: September 1, in the years shown below
Maturity Principal Amount Interest Rate Yield or Price CUSIP No.†
20__ $ % % 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__ 20__
* Preliminary, subject to change. † CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association (“ABA”). CUSIP-based identifiers are assigned by CUSIP Global Services. CUSIP Global Services is managed on behalf of the ABA by Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. The CUSIP numbers have been assigned by an organization not affiliated with the Institution, the Underwriters or the Trustee, and such parties are not responsible for the selection or use of the CUSIP numbers. The CUSIP numbers are included solely for the convenience of holders and no representation is made as to the correctness of the CUSIP numbers printed on the cover hereof. CUSIP numbers assigned to securities may be changed during the term of such securities based on a number of factors including but not limited to the refunding or defeasance of such issue or the use of secondary market financial products. None of the Institution, the Underwriters or the Trustee has agreed to, nor is there any duty or obligation to, update this Offering Memorandum to reflect any change or correction in the CUSIP numbers printed on the inside cover hereof.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page GENERAL INFORMATION ...... iii SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING ...... v INTRODUCTION ...... 1 Purpose of the Bonds and the Plan of Finance ...... 1 The Institution ...... 1 The Bonds ...... 1 Security for the Bonds ...... 1 Additional Bonds ...... 1 Outstanding Indebtedness ...... 2 Redemption ...... 2 Certain Information Related to this Offering Memorandum ...... 2 PLAN OF FINANCE ...... 2 THE BONDS ...... 3 Description of the Bonds ...... 3 Book-Entry Only System ...... 3 Optional Redemption ...... 4 Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption...... 5 Partial Redemption of Bonds ...... 5 Notice of Redemption ...... 5 Effect of Redemption ...... 6 Selection of Bonds for Redemption ...... 6 Purchase of Bonds in Lieu of Redemption ...... 6 SECURITY FOR THE BONDS ...... 7 General ...... 7 Certain Funds and Accounts Established by the Indenture ...... 7 CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS ...... 8 General ...... 8 U.S. Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders ...... 9 U.S. Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders ...... 10 RISK FACTORS ...... 12 UNDERWRITING ...... 13 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE ...... 14 APPROVAL OF LEGALITY ...... 14 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ...... 15 INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ...... 15 RATING ...... 15 MISCELLANEOUS ...... 15
Appendix A – Certain Information Regarding the Institution ...... A-1 Appendix B – Financial Statements of the Institution ...... B-1 Appendix C – Summary of Certain Provisions of the Indenture ...... C-1 Appendix D – Form of Opinion of Counsel to the Institution ...... D-1 Appendix E – DTC Book-Entry Only System and Global Clearance Procedures ...... E-1
ii
GENERAL INFORMATION
This Offering Memorandum does not constitute an offer to sell the Bonds in any jurisdiction in which or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer. No dealer, salesperson or other person has been authorized by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC or Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (the “Underwriters”) or the Institution to give any information or to make any representations, other than those contained herein, in connection with the offering of the Bonds and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the Bonds, or determined that this Offering Memorandum is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. The Bonds have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and are being issued in reliance on an exemption under Section 3(a)(4) of the Securities Act. The Bonds are not exempt in every jurisdiction in the United States.
The distribution of this Offering Memorandum and the offer or sale of Bonds may be restricted by law in certain jurisdictions. Neither the Institution nor the Underwriters represent that this Offering Memorandum may be lawfully distributed, or that any Bonds may be lawfully offered, in compliance with any applicable registration or other requirements in any such jurisdiction, or pursuant to an exemption available thereunder, or assume any responsibility for facilitating any such distribution or offering. In particular, no action has been taken by the Institution or the Underwriters which would permit a public offering of any of the Bonds or distribution of this Offering Memorandum in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. To be clear, action may be required to secure exemptions from the blue sky registration requirements either for the primary distributions or any secondary sales that may occur. Accordingly, none of the Bonds may be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, and neither this Offering Memorandum nor any advertisement or other offering material may be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except under circumstances that will result in compliance with any applicable laws and regulations.
All information set forth herein has been obtained from the Institution and other sources. Estimates and opinions included herein should not be interpreted as statements of fact. Summaries of documents do not purport to be complete statements of their provisions. The information and expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice, and neither the delivery of this Offering Memorandum nor any sale made hereunder will, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Institution since the date hereof.
Certain statements included in this Offering Memorandum constitute “forward-looking statements.” Such statements are generally identifiable by the terminology used such as “plan,” “expect,” “estimate,” “budget,” “intend,” “projection” or other similar words. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, certain statements contained in the information in APPENDIX A – “Certain Information Regarding the Institution.” A number of important factors, including factors affecting the Institution’s financial condition and factors which are otherwise unrelated thereto, could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated in such forward-looking statements. THE INSTITUTION DOES NOT PLAN TO ISSUE ANY UPDATES OR REVISIONS TO THOSE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS IF OR WHEN ITS EXPECTATIONS CHANGE, OR EVENTS, CONDITIONS OR CIRCUMSTANCES ON WHICH SUCH STATEMENTS ARE BASED OCCUR.
The Underwriters have provided the following sentence for inclusion in this Offering Memorandum. The Underwriters have reviewed the information in this Offering Memorandum in accordance with, and as part of, their responsibility to investors under the federal securities laws as applied to the facts and circumstances of this transaction, but the Underwriters do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.
IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING, THE UNDERWRITERS MAY OVERALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS THAT STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE BONDS AT LEVELS ABOVE THOSE WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME.
iii
Each purchaser of the Bonds, by its acceptance thereof, will be deemed to have acknowledged, represented and warranted to, and agreed with, each Underwriter and the Institution as follows:
(1) It understands and acknowledges that the Bonds have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act or any other applicable securities laws, are being offered for resale in transactions not requiring registration under the Securities Act or any other applicable securities laws and may not be offered, sold or otherwise transferred except in compliance with the registration requirements of the Securities Act and any other applicable securities laws or pursuant to an exemption therefrom.
(2) It acknowledges that neither the Institution nor any Underwriter, nor any person representing the Institution or any Underwriter, has made any representations to it with respect to the Institution or the offer or sale of any Bonds, other than in this Offering Memorandum, which has been delivered to it and upon which it is relying in making its investment decision with respect to the Bonds. Accordingly, it acknowledges that neither the Institution nor any Underwriter makes any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any materials other than this Offering Memorandum. It also acknowledges that it has had access to such financial and other information concerning the Institution and the Bonds as it has deemed necessary in connection with its decision to purchase Bonds, including an opportunity to ask questions of and request information from each Underwriter and the Institution.
(3) Either (i) it is not acquiring or holding such note or an interest therein with the assets of (A) an ‘‘employee benefit plan’’ (as defined in Section 3(3) of The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”)) that is subject to ERISA, (B) a ‘‘plan’’ described in Section 4975 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), (C) any entity deemed to hold ‘‘plan assets’’ of any of the foregoing by reason of an employee benefit plan’s or plan’s investment in such entity or (D) a governmental plan or church plan subject to such provisions that are similar to such provisions of ERISA or the Code (collectively, ‘‘Similar Laws’’); or (ii) the acquisition and holding of such Bonds by it, throughout the period that it holds such Bonds and the disposition of such Bonds or an interest therein will not constitute or result in a non-exempt prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code, a breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA, or a violation of any provisions of any applicable Similar Laws.
It acknowledges that the Institution, the Underwriters and others will rely upon the truth and accuracy of the foregoing acknowledgements, representations, warranties and agreements and agrees that, if any acknowledgements, representations, warranties and agreements deemed to have been made by it are no longer accurate, it shall promptly notify the Institution and each Underwriter. If it is acquiring any of the Bonds as a fiduciary or agent for one or more investor accounts, it represents that it has sole investment discretion with respect to each such account and that it has full power to make the foregoing acknowledgements, representations, warranties and agreements on behalf of each such account.
iv
SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING
Issuer The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.
Securities Offered $65,000,000* Taxable Bonds, Series 2018, due September __, 20__ through September __, 20__; price ___%.
Interest Accrual Dates Interest will accrue from Date of Issuance
Interest Payment Dates September 1 and March 1 of each year, commencing September 1, 2018
Redemption The Bonds are subject to optional redemption and mandatory sinking fund redemption as discussed more fully herein. See “THE BONDS – Redemption”.
Date of Issuance March __, 2018
Authorized Denominations $1,000 and any integral multiple thereof
Form and Depository The Bonds will be delivered solely in registered form under a global book- entry system through the facilities of DTC.
Use of Proceeds The Institution will use the net proceeds from the sale of the Bonds to finance and refinance certain capital projects of the Institution and for other general corporate purposes and to pay ceratin costs of issuance. See “PLAN OF FINANCE” herein.
Rating Moody’s: Aa3†
* Preliminary, subject to change. † A securities rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time.
v
OFFERING MEMORANDUM
Relating to
$65,000,000* THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC. TAXABLE BONDS, SERIES 2018
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this Offering Memorandum, which includes the cover page, the table of contents and appendices, is to provide certain information concerning the sale and delivery by The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. (the “Institution”) of $65,000,000* aggregate principal amount of its The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Taxable Bonds, Series 2018 (the “Bonds”). This Introduction contains only a brief summary of certain of the terms of the Bonds being offered and a brief description of the Offering Memorandum. All statements contained in this Introduction are qualified in their entirety by reference to the entire Offering Memorandum.
Purpose of the Bonds and the Plan of Finance
The Institution will use the proceeds from the sale of the Bonds to finance and refinance certain capital projects of the Institution and for other general corporate purposes (the “Project”) and to pay certain costs of issuance of the Bonds. See “PLAN OF FINANCE” herein.
The Institution
The Institution is an independent research and development organization that serves government and commercial clients in applied research, engineering development, education and technology transfer, and is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Important information on the financial condition of the Institution is set forth in APPENDIX A –“Certain Information Regarding the Institution” and APPENDIX B -”Financial Statements of the Institution” attached hereto, both of which should be read in their entirety.
The Bonds
The Bonds will be issued pursuant to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of March 1, 2018 (the “Indenture”), by and between the Institution and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N .A., as trustee (the “Trustee”). Pursuant to the Indenture, on each Payment Date, until the principal of and interest on the Bonds shall have been paid or provision for such payment shall have been made as provided in the Indenture, the Institution will pay the Trustee a sum equal to the amount payable on such Payment Date as principal of or interest on the Bonds. See “THE BONDS” herein.
Security for the Bonds
The Bonds will constitute unsecured general obligations of the Institution. The Institution will not be restricted by the Indenture from incurring additional indebtedness. Such additional indebtedness, if issued, may be either secured or unsecured and may be entitled to payment prior to payment on the Bonds. See “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS” herein.
Additional Bonds
The Institution may, from time to time, without the consent of the holders of the Bonds, issue additional bonds under the Indenture in addition to the Bonds (the “Additional Bonds”). If issued, the Additional Bonds will become part of the same series as the Bonds being offered by this Offering Memorandum and will have the same interest rate, redemption provisions and maturity date, but may have a different CUSIP number from the Bonds.
* Preliminary, subject to change.
1
Outstanding Indebtedness
Substantially concurrent with the issuance of the Bonds, the Institution expects to enter into a medium-term capital financing with an affiliate of Bank of America to finance certain equipment in an amount not to exceed $15,000,000. See APPENDIX A – “Certain Information Regarding the Institution – OTHER MATTERS – Future Financing Plans” for more information.
As of June 30, 2017, the outstanding par amount of long-term indebtedness of the Institution totaled $45,600,000. In addition, the Institution has a line of credit, dated January 31, 2014, with Bank of America, N.A. (the “Bank of America Line of Credit”). The Institution has drawn $22.0 million from its $25.0 million Bank of America Line of Credit. A portion of the Bond proceeds will be used to payoff the Bank of America Line of Credit. The Bank of America Line of Credit is scheduled to expire on January 30, 2019, subject to indefinite one year renewals at Bank of America, N.A.’s option. The Institution also has $15.0 million of availability under its $15.0 million secured business demand line of credit note, dated February 1, 2011, with BNY Mellon, National Association (the “BNY Line of Credit”). The BNY Line of Credit may be closed at any time by either the Institution or BNY Mellon. Future borrowings, if any, under the BNY Line of Credit will be secured by a significant portion of the Institution’s investment portfolio.
For additional information regarding the outstanding indebtedness of the Institution, see APPENDIX B – “Financial Statements of the Institution” attached hereto. For additional information about the Project, see “PLAN OF FINANCE.”
Redemption
The Bonds are subject to optional redemption by the Institution prior to maturity as described herein. The Bonds are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption as described herein. See “THE BONDS–Redemption” herein.
Certain Information Related to this Offering Memorandum
The descriptions herein of the Indenture and other documents relating to the Bonds do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such documents, and the description herein of the Bonds is qualified in its entirety by the form thereof and the information with respect thereto included in such documents. See APPENDIX C –“Summary of Certain Provisions of the Indenture” attached hereto for a brief summary of the Indenture, including descriptions of certain duties of the Trustee, rights and remedies of the Trustee and the Bondholders upon an Event of Default, and provisions relating to amendments of the Indenture and procedures for defeasance of the Bonds.
All capitalized terms used in this Offering Memorandum and not otherwise defined herein have the same meanings as in the Indenture. See APPENDIX C –“Summary of Certain Provisions of the Indenture” attached hereto for definitions of certain words and terms used but not otherwise defined herein.
The information and expressions of opinion herein speak only as of their date and are subject to change without notice. Neither delivery of this Offering Memorandum nor any sale made hereunder nor any future use of this Offering Memorandum will, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Institution.
PLAN OF FINANCE
The proceeds from the sale of the Bonds will be: (i) transferred to the Institution and used to pay the costs of the Project; and (ii) applied to pay certain costs of issuance of the Bonds.
2
THE BONDS
Description of the Bonds
The Bonds will be dated as of the date of their original issuance and will bear interest and mature (subject to prior redemption) as shown on the inside front cover page hereof.
Interest on the Bonds will be payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year (each, an “Interest Payment Date”), commencing on September 1, 2018, and will be calculated on the basis of a three hundred sixty (360) day year consisting of twelve (12) thirty (30) day months.
The principal and Redemption Price of the Bonds, if applicable, will be payable by check or by wire transfer of immediately available funds in lawful money of the United States of America at the Designated Office of the Trustee.
Interest on the Bonds will be payable from the later of (i) the date of issuance and (ii) the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for. Payment of the interest on each Interest Payment Date will be made to the Person whose name appears on the bond registration books of the Trustee as the Holder thereof as of the close of business on the Record Date for each Interest Payment Date, such interest to be paid by check mailed by first class mail to such Holder at its address as it appears on such registration books, or, upon the written request of any Holder of at least $1,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of Bonds, submitted to the Trustee at least one (1) Business Day prior to the Record Date, by wire transfer in immediately available funds to an account within the United States designated by such Holder. The Record Date is the fifteenth day of the month immediately preceding each Interest Payment Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, as long as Cede & Co. is the Holder of all or part of the Bonds in Book-Entry Form, said principal, Redemption Price, if applicable, and interest payments will be made to Cede & Co. by wire transfer in immediately available funds.
Book-Entry Only System
The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and, when issued, will be held by DTC through Cede & Co., as its nominee, as securities depository with respect to the Bonds. Individual purchases of interests in the Bonds will be made in book-entry form only, in the principal amount of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof. Individual purchasers will not receive physical delivery of bond certificates. So long as Cede & Co. is the registered owner of the Bonds as nominee of DTC, references herein to the holders or registered owners of the Bonds will mean Cede & Co. and will not mean the beneficial owners of the Bonds. Beneficial interests in the Bonds will be held through DTC directly as a participant in such system. See APPENDIX E –“DTC Book-Entry Only System and Global Clearance Procedures.”
As long as the Bonds are held by DTC or its nominee, interest will be paid to Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, in same-day funds on each Interest Payment Date. If the book-entry only system is discontinued, bond certificates will be delivered as described in the Bond Indenture, and Beneficial Owners (as defined herein) will become registered owners of the Bonds (the “Bondholders”). If the book-entry only system is discontinued, interest on the Bonds will be payable on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the registered owner at the address that appears on the Bond Register as of the 15th day of the month preceding an Interest Payment Date.
None of the Institution, the Trustee or the Underwriters will have any responsibility or obligation to the Participants, DTC or the persons for whom they act with respect to (i) the accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or by any Direct or Indirect Participant of DTC, (ii) payments or the providing of notice to Direct Participants, the Indirect Participants or the beneficial owners, (iii) the selection by DTC or by any Direct or Indirect Participant of any beneficial owner to receive payment in the event of a partial redemption of the Bonds or the manner in which DTC will administer a partial redemption of the Bonds or (iv) any other action taken by DTC or its nominee as owner of the Bonds. For more information on DTC and the book entry only system. See APPENDIX E –“DTC Book-Entry Only System and Global Clearance Procedures.”
3
Optional Redemption
The Bonds are subject to optional redemption at any time, in whole or in part, on any Redemption Date, at the Redemption Price, which includes interest accrued to, but not including, the applicable Redemption Date, on the Bonds, or portions thereof, being redeemed.
“Make-Whole Redemption Price” means an amount equal to the greater of:
(1) 100% of the principal amount of any Bonds, or portion thereof, being redeemed; and
(2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal of and interest on the Bonds, or portion thereof, being redeemed (exclusive of interest accrued and unpaid as of the Redemption Date), discounted to the Redemption Date on a semiannual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at the Treasury Rate plus (a) 10 basis points for the Bonds due September 1, 20__ through September 1, 20__; (b) 20 basis points for the Bonds due September 1, 20__ through September 1, 20__; and (c) 25 basis points for the Bonds due September 1, 20__ through September 1, 20__, inclusive,
plus, in each case accrued and unpaid interest on such Bonds to be redeemed on the Redemption Date.
“Business Day” means any day other than (A) a Saturday or Sunday or legal holiday or a day on which banking institutions in the city or cities in which the Designated Office of the Trustee is located are authorized by law or executive order to close or (B) a day on which the New York Stock Exchange is closed.
“Comparable Treasury Issue” means, with respect to the Bonds of a particular maturity, the United States Treasury security selected by a Designated Investment Banker as having an actual maturity comparable to the remaining average life of the Bonds of such maturity to be optionally redeemed that would be utilized, at the time of selection and in accordance with customary financial practice, in pricing new issues of corporate debt securities of comparable remaining average life of such Bond to be redeemed.
“Comparable Treasury Price” means, with respect to any such Redemption Date, with respect to the Bonds of a particular maturity, (A) the average of Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations for such Redemption Date, after excluding the highest and lowest of such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations, or (B) if the Designated Investment Banker obtains fewer than four such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations, the average of all such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations.
“Designated Investment Banker” means one of the Reference Treasury Dealers appointed by the Institution.
“Redemption Date” means with respect to any optional redemption of Bonds, any Business Day selected as the date of redemption for such Bonds as set forth in the notice of redemption.
“Redemption Price” means with respect to the Bonds that are begin optionally redeemed (a) prior to March __, 2028, the Make-Whole Redemption Price, and (b) on or after March __, 2028, the principal amount thereof.
“Reference Treasury Dealer” means J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and three additional firms, as designated by the Institution, and the respective affiliates of each that are primary U.S. Government securities dealers (each a “Primary Treasury Dealer”), together with the respective successors of each of the foregoing; provided that, if any of them ceases to be a Primary Treasury Dealer, the Institution shall substitute therefore another Primary Treasury Dealer.
“Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations” means, with respect to each Reference Treasury Dealer and any Redemption Date, the average, as determined by the Designated Investment Banker, of the bid and asked prices for the applicable Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed in each case as a percentage of its principal amount) quoted in writing to the Designated Investment Banker and communicated to the Trustee by such Reference Treasury Dealer at 3:30 p.m., New York City time, on the third Business Day preceding such Redemption Date.
4
“Treasury Rate” means, with respect to any Redemption Date, with respect to the Bonds of a particular maturity, the rate per annum equal to the semiannual equivalent yield to maturity (on a day count basis) of the Comparable Treasury Issue, assuming a price for the Comparable Treasury Issue (expressed as a percentage of its principal amount) equal to the Comparable Treasury Price for such Redemption Date.
Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption.
The Bonds maturing on September 1, 20__ are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption at their principal amounts without premium on September 1 of each of the years and in the amounts as follows:
Year Principal Amount
†Maturity
There will be credited against and in satisfaction of the sinking fund installment payable on any date the principal amount of Bonds entitled to such sinking fund installment purchased by the Trustee with money in the Bond Fund and the principal amount of Bonds so purchased will be applied against and in fulfillment of the sinking fund installment due on the succeeding September 1. In addition, there will be credited against and in satisfaction of the Bonds maturing ____, Bonds scheduled to mature on such date that are (i) redeemed by the Institution pursuant to the Indenture, (ii) purchased by the Institution and delivered to the Trustee for cancellation or (iii) defeased in accordance with the Indenture, and the principal amount of such Bonds redeemed, purchased or defeased will be applied against and in fulfillment of the required sinking fund installments thereafter payable, as nearly as practicable pro rata, taking into consideration the Authorized Denominations. For the purpose of clarity, accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount of Bonds redeemed on a Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption Date shall be paid to the Holders of such Bonds as of the close of business on the Record Date immediately preceding such Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption Date. Registration of Bonds in the Book-Entry System.
Partial Redemption of Bonds
Upon surrender of any Bond redeemed in part only, the Institution will execute (but need not prepare) and the Trustee will prepare or cause to be prepared, authenticate and deliver to the Holder thereof, at the expense of the Institution, a new Bond or Bonds of Authorized Denominations, equal in aggregate principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond surrendered.
Notice of Redemption
Notice of redemption shall be mailed by the Trustee by first class mail, not less than twenty (20) days, nor more than sixty (60) days prior to the redemption date, to the respective Holders of any Bonds designated for redemption at their addresses appearing on the bond registration books of the Trustee. If the Bonds are no longer held by the Securities Depository or its successor or substitute, the Trustee shall also give notice of redemption by overnight mail to such securities depositories and/or securities information services as shall be designated in a certificate of the Institution. Each notice of redemption shall state the date of such notice, the date of issue of the Bonds, the redemption date, the Redemption Price, the place or places of redemption (including the name and appropriate address or addresses of the Trustee), the maturity (including CUSIP number, if any), and, in the case of Bonds to be redeemed in part only, the portion of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed. Each such notice shall also state that on the Redemption Date there will become due and payable on each of said Bonds the redemption price thereof or of said specified portion of the principal amount thereof in the case of a Bond to be redeemed in part only and that from and after such redemption date interest thereon shall cease to accrue on the Bonds subject to redemption, and shall require that such Bonds be then surrendered.
5
Failure by the Trustee to give notice as described above to anyone or more of the securities information services or depositories designated by the Institution, or the insufficiency of any such notice will not affect the sufficiency of the proceedings for redemption. Failure by the Trustee to mail notice of redemption to anyone or more of the respective Holders of any Bonds designated for redemption will not affect the sufficiency of the proceedings for redemption with respect to the Holders to whom such notice was mailed.
With respect to the optional redemption of some or all of the Bonds, the Institution may instruct the Trustee to provide conditional notice of redemption, which may be conditioned upon the receipt of moneys or any other event. Additionally, any such notice may be rescinded by written notice given to the Trustee by the Institution no later than five (5) Business Days prior to the Redemption Date. The Trustee will give notice of such rescission, as soon thereafter as practicable, in the same manner, to the same Persons, as notice of such redemption was given.
Effect of Redemption
Notice of redemption having been duly given as provided in the Indenture and as described above, and moneys for payment of the Redemption Price of the Bonds (or portion thereof) so called for redemption being held by the Trustee, on the date fixed for redemption designated in such notice, the Bonds (or portion thereof) so called for redemption shall become due and payable at the applicable Redemption Price described in such notice, interest on the Bonds so called for redemption shall cease to accrue, said Bonds (or portion thereof) will cease to be entitled to any benefit or security under the Indenture, and the Holders of said Bonds will have no rights in respect thereof except to receive payment of the applicable Redemption Price from funds held by the Trustee for such payment.
Selection of Bonds for Redemption
Subject to the provisions of the two immediately succeeding paragraphs, whenever provision is made in the Indenture for the redemption of less than all of the Bonds of any maturity or any given portion thereof, the Trustee shall select the Bonds of such maturity to be redeemed, from all Bonds of such maturity subject to redemption or such given portion thereof not previously called for redemption, by lot or in any other manner which the Trustee in its sole discretion shall deem appropriate.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to Bonds Outstanding that are registered in book-entry only form and so long as DTC or a successor securities depository is the sole registered owner of the Bonds, if less than all of such Bonds of any maturity are to be redeemed upon any redemption of Bonds hereunder, the particular Bonds of such maturity or portions of Bonds such maturity to be redeemed shall be selected on a pro rata pass through distribution of principal basis in accordance with the applicable securities depository procedures; provided that, so long as the Bonds are held in book-entry form, the selection for redemption of Bonds of such maturity shall be made in accordance with the operational arrangements of the securities depository then in effect.
It is the Institution’s intent that redemption allocations made by the securities depository be made on a pro rata pass through distribution of principal basis as described above. However, neither the Institution nor the Underwriters can provide any assurance that the securities depository, the securities depository’s direct and indirect participants or any other intermediary will allocate the redemption of Bonds on such basis. If the securities depository operational arrangements do not allow for the redemption of the Bonds of any maturity on a pro rata pass through distribution of principal basis as discussed above, then the Bonds will be selected for redemption, in accordance with the securities depository procedures, which may be by lot.
If DTC or its nominee or a successor securities depository is no longer the sole registered owner of the Bonds, if less than all of the Bonds are called for redemption, the Trustee shall select the Bonds of such maturity to be redeemed, from all Bonds of such maturity subject to redemption or such given portion thereof not previously called for redemption, by lot or in any other manner which the Trustee in its sole discretion shall deem appropriate.
Purchase of Bonds in Lieu of Redemption
When Bonds are called for optional redemption pursuant to the Indenture, the Institution may purchase some or all of the Bonds called for redemption if it gives written notice to the Trustee not later than the close of
6
business on the Business Day immediately preceding a Redemption Date that it wishes to purchase the principal amount of Bonds specified in the notice, at a purchase price no greater than the Redemption Price. On the date specified as the Redemption Date under the Indenture, the Institution is required to furnish the Trustee sufficient funds in sufficient time for the Trustee to make the purchase on the Redemption Date.
SECURITY FOR THE BONDS
General
The Indenture provides that, on or before each Payment Date, the Institution will pay the Trustee a sum equal to the amount payable on such Payment Date as principal of and interest on the Bonds. In addition, the Indenture provides that each such payment made will at all times be sufficient to pay the total amount of interest and principal (whether at maturity or upon acceleration) becoming due and payable on the Bonds on such Payment Date. If on any Payment Date, the amounts held by the Trustee in the accounts within the Bond Fund (as described below) are insufficient to make any required payments of principal of (whether at maturity or upon acceleration) and interest on the Bonds as such payments become due, the Institution is required to pay such deficiency to the Trustee. Upon the receipt thereof, the Trustee will deposit all payments received from the Institution into certain funds and accounts established pursuant to the Indenture. See “Certain Funds and Accounts Established by the Indenture” below.
The Bonds constitute unsecured general obligations of the Institution. The Bonds are not secured by a reserve fund, mortgage lien or security interest on or in any funds or other assets of the Institution, except for funds held from time to time by the Trustee for the benefit of the Holders of the Bonds under the Indenture. Pursuant to the Indenture and as described above, the Institution is not required to deposit with the Trustee amounts necessary to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds until the Payment Date on which such amounts become due and payable; therefore, the funds held from time to time by the Trustee for the benefit of the Holders of the Bonds under the Indenture are expected to be minimal.
The Indenture does not contain any financial or other covenants limiting the ability of the Institution to incur indebtedness, encumber or dispose of its property or merge with any other entity, or any other restrictive covenants. Further, the Institution is not required by the Indenture to produce revenues at any specified level or to obtain any insurance with respect to its property or operations. The Institution is not restricted by the Indenture from incurring additional indebtedness or creating any liens on its assets. Such additional indebtedness, if issued, may be either secured or unsecured and may be entitled to payment prior to payment on the Bonds.
Certain Funds and Accounts Established by the Indenture
Under the Indenture, the Trustee has established for the sole benefit of the Bondholders, a master fund referred to as the “Indenture Fund,” containing the Bond Fund and the Redemption Fund and each of the funds and accounts contained therein. The Institution has pledged, assigned and transferred the Indenture Fund and all amounts held therein to the Trustee for the benefit of the Bondholders to secure the full payment of the principal or applicable Redemption Price of and interest on the Bonds in accordance with their terms and the provisions of the Indenture. The Indenture Fund and all amounts on deposit therein constitute collateral security to secure the full payment of the principal or applicable Redemption Price of and interest on the Bonds in accordance with their terms and provisions of the Indenture. Due to the timing of payments by the Institution to the Trustee, in general there is not expected to be any money in the Indenture Fund.
For information on other funds and accounts established by the Indenture, see APPENDIX C –“Summary of Certain Provisions of the Indenture” attached hereto.
7
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
General
The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations with respect to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the Bonds by U.S. Holders (as defined below) and Non-U.S. Holders (as defined below), but does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax considerations. This summary is based upon the Code, the Treasury Regulations (the “Regulations”) promulgated thereunder, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as of the date hereof and all of which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis, and to differing interpretations, which could result in U.S. federal income tax considerations different from those described below. This summary is limited to the tax considerations with respect to Bonds that are purchased by an initial holder at their original issue price for cash and that are held as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment). This summary does not address the tax consequences to subsequent purchasers of the Bonds.
This summary does not purport to deal with all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that might be relevant to particular holders in light of their circumstances or status, nor does it address specific tax consequences that may be relevant to particular holders that may be subject to special tax rules, such as, for example:
• banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions;
• brokers and dealers in securities;
• traders in securities that elect mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities;
• insurance companies;
• partnerships or other pass-through entities;
• persons who are investors in a pass-through entity holding Bonds;
• tax-exempt organizations;
• regulated investment companies;
• real estate investment trusts;
• “controlled foreign corporations”;
• “passive foreign investment companies”;
• certain U.S. expatriates;
• U.S. Holders that have a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar; or
• persons who hold Bonds as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion or other integrated financial transaction or are deemed to sell Bonds under the constructive sale provisions of the Code.
In addition, this summary does not address U.S. federal alternative minimum, estate and gift tax consequences or consequences under the tax laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction. The Institution has not sought, and will not seek, any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) with respect to the statements made and the conclusions reached in this summary, and there is no assurance that the IRS will agree with such statements and conclusions.
8
THIS SUMMARY IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE BONDS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS CONCERNING THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF ACQUIRING, OWNING AND DISPOSING OF THE BONDS, AS WELL AS THE APPLICATION OF STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN INCOME AND OTHER TAX LAWS.
For purposes of the following summary, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of Bonds that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) a citizen or individual resident of the United States; (ii) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia; (iii) an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or (iv) a trust, if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions or if a valid election to be treated as a U.S. person is in effect with respect to such trust. A “Non-U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of Bonds that is (i) a foreign corporation, (ii) a nonresident alien individual, or (iii) a foreign estate or trust that in either case is not subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net- income basis on income or gain from a Bond.
If a partnership (or other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds Bonds, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partner in a partnership holding Bonds should consult its tax advisor.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders
Payments of Stated Interest
Stated interest on a Bond will generally be taxable to a U.S. Holder as ordinary income at the time such interest is received or accrued, depending on the U.S. Holder’s regular method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Sale, Exchange, Redemption, Retirement or Other Taxable Disposition of Bonds
Upon the sale, exchange, redemption, retirement or other taxable disposition of a Bond, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the sale, exchange, redemption, retirement or other disposition (less an amount equal to any accrued but unpaid interest, which will be taxable as interest income as discussed above to the extent not previously included in income by the U.S. Holder) and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted U.S. federal income tax basis in the Bond. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted U.S. federal income tax basis in a Bond generally will be its cost for the Bond. Any such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss. Capital gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders (including individuals) derived in respect of capital assets held for more than one year currently are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Tax on Net Investment Income
In addition any payments of interest on or capital gains earned from the sale, exchange, or other taxable disposition of the Bonds may be subject to the 3.8% tax on net investment income for certain U.S. Holders who are individuals, estates, or trusts. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the implications of the net investment income tax in their particular circumstances.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
For each calendar year in which the Bonds are outstanding, the IRS must be provided with certain information, including the beneficial owner’s name, address and taxpayer identification number, the aggregate amount of interest paid to that beneficial owner during the calendar year and the amount of tax withheld, if any. This obligation, however, does not apply with respect to payments to certain types of U.S. Holders, including corporations and tax-exempt organizations, provided that they establish entitlement to an exemption.
9
In the event that a U.S. Holder subject to the reporting requirements described above fails to provide its correct taxpayer identification number in the manner required by applicable law, or underreports its tax liability, the Institution, its agent or paying agents, or a broker may be required to “backup” withhold at the applicable statutory rate on each payment on the Bonds and on the proceeds from a sale of the Bonds. The backup withholding obligation, however, does not apply with respect to payments to certain types of U.S. Holders, including corporations and tax-exempt organizations, provided that they establish entitlement to an exemption.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax and may generally be refunded or credited against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding their qualifications for an exemption from backup withholding, and the procedure for establishing such exemption, if applicable.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders
Payments of Interest
The gross amount of interest payments to a Non-U.S. Holder of interest that does not qualify for the portfolio interest exemption and that is not effectively connected with the conduct by such Non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business within the U.S. (or, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is not attributable to a permanent establishment of such Non-U.S. Holder in the United States) will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at the rate of 30% unless a U.S. income tax treaty applies to reduce or eliminate such withholding tax. The 30% U.S. federal withholding tax will not apply to any payment to a Non-U.S. Holder of interest on a Bond under the “portfolio interest exemption” provided that:
• the Non-U.S. Holder does not actually or constructively own 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Institution entitled to vote;
• the Non-U.S. Holder is not a “controlled foreign corporation” that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is related (within the meaning of Section 864(d)(4) of the Code) to the Institution; and
• either (a) the beneficial owner of the Bonds certifies on IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E, as applicable (or other applicable or successor form), under penalties of perjury, that it is not a “U.S. person” (as defined in the Code) and provides its name and address, or (b) a securities clearing organization, bank or other financial institution that holds customers’ securities in the ordinary course of its trade or business (a “financial institution”) and holds the Bonds on behalf of the beneficial owner certifies to the Institution or its agent, under penalties of perjury, that a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN or IRS Form W-8BEN-E, as applicable (or other applicable or successor form) has been received from the beneficial owner by it or by a financial institution between it and the beneficial owner and furnishes the Institution with a copy thereof.
If a Non-U.S. Holder is engaged in a trade or business in the United States and interest paid on the Bond constitutes income that is effectively connected with the conduct of that trade or business (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a permanent establishment of that Non-U.S. Holder), or U.S. trade or business income, such interest will be taxed on a net basis at regular graduated U.S. income tax rates rather than 30% gross rate. In the case of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation, such U.S. trade or business Income may also be subject to the branch profits tax at a 30% rate (or lower applicable income tax treaty rate).
To claim the benefit of a tax treaty exemption from or reduction in withholding, or to claim exemption from withholding because the income is U.S. trade or business Income, a Non-U.S. Holder must provide a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E or W-8ECI (or such successor forms as the IRS designates), as applicable. The Non-U.S. Holder must provide the form to its withholding agent. These forms must be periodically updated. A Non-U.S. Holder who is claiming the benefits of an income tax treaty may be required in certain instances to obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and to provide certain documentary evidence issued by foreign governmental authorities to prove residence in the foreign country.
10
Sale, Exchange, Redemption, Retirement or Other Taxable Disposition of Bonds
No withholding of U.S. federal income tax will generally be required with respect to any gain or income realized by a Non-U.S. Holder upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of a Bond (except to the extent such income is attributable to accrued but unpaid interest, which will be treated as interest as described above under “— U.S. federal income taxation of Non-U.S. Holders—Payments of interest”).
Except with respect to accrued and unpaid interest, a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on gain realized on the sale, exchange, redemption, retirement or other disposition of a Bond unless the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for a period or periods aggregating 183 or more days in the taxable year of the disposition and certain other conditions are met, or such gain or income is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base of the beneficial owner maintained in the United States). Accrued and unpaid interest realized on a sale, exchange or other disposition of a Bond will be treated as discussed under “—U.S. federal income taxation of Non-U.S. Holders—Payments of interest.”
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
U.S. backup withholding will not apply to payments of interest on a Bond or proceeds from the sale or other disposition of a Bond payable to a Non-U.S. Holder if the certification described in “—U.S. federal income taxation of Non-U.S. Holders—Payments of interest” is duly provided by such Non-U.S. Holder or the Non-U.S. Holder otherwise establishes an exemption, provided that the payor does not have actual knowledge that such holder is a U.S. person or that the conditions of any claimed exemption are not satisfied. Certain information reporting still may apply to interest payments even if an exemption from backup withholding is established. Copies of any information returns reporting interest payments and any withholding also may be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which a Non-U.S. Holder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding tax rules from a payment to a Non-U.S. Holder will be allowed as a refund or a credit against such Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Non-U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding their particular circumstances and the availability of and procedure for establishing an exemption from backup withholding.
Withholding on Foreign Accounts
Legislation known as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”) and guidance issued thereunder imposes a withholding tax at a rate of 30% on U.S.-source interest and on sales or redemption proceeds paid to (i) “foreign financial institutions” (as defined for this purpose) unless the institution (a) is located in a jurisdiction that has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the United States, (b) enters into an agreement with the U.S. government to collect and provide to the U.S. tax authorities information regarding U.S. account holders of such institution (which would include certain equity and debt holders of such institution, as well as certain account holders that are foreign entities with U.S. owners) or (c) meets other exemptions or (ii) a foreign entity that is not a financial institution, unless the entity (x) is located in a jurisdiction that has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the United States, (y) provides the withholding agent with a certification identifying the substantial U.S. owners of the entity (as defined for this purpose) or (z) meets other exemptions. If FATCA withholding is imposed, a beneficial owner that is not a foreign financial institution may under certain circumstances be eligible for a refund or credit of any amounts withheld by filing a U.S. federal income tax return (which may entail significant administrative burden). Prospective investors should consult their tax advisers regarding the effects of FATCA on their investment in the Bonds.
11
RISK FACTORS
Purchase of the Bonds involves a degree of risk. In order to identify risk factors and make an informed investment decision, potential investors should be thoroughly familiar with this entire Offering Memorandum (including the Appendices hereto) in order to make a judgment as to whether the Bonds are an appropriate investment. Certain of the risks associated with the purchase of the Bonds are described below. The following list of possible factors, while not setting forth all the factors which must be considered, contains some of the factors which should be considered prior to purchasing the Bonds. This discussion of risk factors is not, and is not intended to be, comprehensive or exhaustive. Prospective purchasers of the Bonds should give careful consideration to the matters referred to in the following summary. Such summary should not be considered exhaustive, but rather informational only.
Decrease in Contracts
The Institution’s ability to retain research staff and meet budgetary forecasts is substantially dependent on receiving contracts from the Department of Defense and other U.S. government and commercial sponsors. There are also other organizations that compete with the Institution for these contracts. There can be no assurance that the Institution will continue to receive such contracts in the future.
Termination Rights
The Institution’s contracts with the Department of Defense and other U.S. government sponsors contain termination and change provisions that give the counterparties rights and remedies not typically found in commercial contracts, including rights that empower such counterparties to terminate existing contracts for convenience (i.e. without cause), reduce or modify contracts or subcontracts if requirements or budgetary constraints change, and terminate multi-year contracts and related orders if funds for performance for any subsequent year are not available.
Adequacy of Revenues
No representation or assurance can be given that the Institution will generate sufficient revenue to pay the Bonds and to make other payments required by the Indenture. The ability of the Institution to make payments under the Indenture depends, among other things, upon the capabilities of management of the Institution, economic conditions including the demand for the services offered by the Institution, changes in federal funding, the ability of the Institution to realize an adequate return on its investments and other factors. In addition, funding of contracts by the Department of Defense and other U.S. government sponsors can be subject to significant delays. No assurances can be given that the revenues available to the Institution from its operations will be available in amounts sufficient to make the required payments under the Indenture. For a discussion of the financial condition of the Institution, see APPENDIX A – “Certain Information Regarding the Institution” and also see the audited financial statements of the Institution as of June 30, 2017 and July 1, 2016 included in APPENDIX B hereto.
Default by the Institution
No representations or assurances can be given that the Institution will not default in performing its obligations under the Indenture. If an Event of Default occurs under the Indenture, the Trustee may accelerate the maturity of the Bonds. In addition, no premium will be received upon an acceleration of the Bonds due to a default. No assurance can be given that the Institution will have the funds necessary to pay the principal and interest due on the Bonds in connection with any acceleration thereof.
12
No Mortgage or Other Security Interest
The Bonds are not secured by a mortgage, lien or security interest in any real or personal property of the Institution except for a pledge by the Institution of its interest in any funds established under the Indenture. Due to the timing of payments by the Institution to the Trustee, in general there is not expected to be any money in the funds established under the Indenture.
Economic Factors Beyond the Institution’s Control
Apart from competition and other business risks facing the Institution, the financial performance of the Institution will depend to some degree upon factors beyond the control of its management, including general national and local economic conditions (e.g., inflation, unemployment, population growth and distribution trends) and federal, state and local taxation and laws and regulations affecting the Institution.
Enforceability of Remedies
The remedies available to the Trustee and the Bondholders upon an Event of Default under the Indenture are in many respects dependent upon judicial actions which are, in turn, often subject to discretion and delay. Under existing constitutional and statutory laws and judicial decisions, including specifically the Federal Bankruptcy Code, a particular remedy specified by the Indenture may not be readily available or, if available, may be limited or subject to substantial delay. The various legal opinions to be delivered concurrently with the issuance and delivery of the Bonds will be qualified as to the enforceability of the various legal instruments by limitations imposed by principles of equity and by bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, moratorium and similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally.
Market Factors
The financial condition of the Institution as well as the market for the Bonds could be affected by a variety of factors, some of which are beyond the Institution’s control. There can be no assurance that an adverse event will not occur which might affect the market price of and the market for the Bonds. If a significant event should occur in the affairs of the Institution, the market for and market value of the Bonds could be adversely affected.
Miscellaneous
The Institution may be impacted by the cost and the limited availability and sufficiency of insurance for risks such as property damage and general liability.
The occurrence of natural disasters, including earthquakes and hurricanes, may damage the facilities of the Institution, interrupt utility service to the facilities, or otherwise impair the operations of the Institution and the generation of revenues from its facilities. The facilities of the Institution are covered by general property insurance in an amount which its management considers to be sufficient to provide for the replacement of such facilities in the event of a natural disaster.
UNDERWRITING
The Institution has entered into a purchase contract with the Underwriters listed on the cover hereof for whom J.P. Morgan Securities LLC is acting as representative, and the Underwriters have agreed to purchase the Bonds from the Institution at an aggregate discount of $______from the public offering price set forth on the cover page hereof.
The purchase contract pursuant to which the Bonds are being sold provides that the Underwriters will purchase not less than all of the Bonds. The Underwriters’ obligation to make such purchase is subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the purchase contract, the approval of certain legal matters by counsel and certain other conditions.
13
The Underwriters may offer and sell the Bonds to certain dealers and others at a price lower than the initial offering price. The offering price of Bonds may be changed from time to time by the Underwriters.
The Underwriters and their respective affiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in various activities, which may include securities trading, commercial and investment banking, financial advisory, investment management, principal investment, hedging, financing and brokerage activities. Such activities may involve or relate to assets, securities and/or instruments of the Institution (whether directly, as collateral securing other obligations or otherwise) and/or persons and entities with relationships with the Institution. Certain of the Underwriters and their respective affiliates have, from time to time, performed, and may in the future perform, various investment banking services for the Institution, for which they received or will receive customary fees and expenses. Under certain circumstances, certain of the Underwriters and their respective affiliates may have certain creditor and/or other rights against the Institution and any affiliates thereof in connection with such transactions and/or services. In addition, certain of the Underwriters and their respective affiliates may currently have and may in the future have investment and commercial banking, trust and other relationships with parties that may relate to assets of, or be involved in the issuance of securities and/or instruments by the Institution or any affiliates thereof. The Underwriters and their respective affiliates also may communicate independent research views in respect of such assets, securities or instruments and at any time may hold, or recommend to clients that they should acquire, long and/or short positions in such assets, securities and instruments.
In the ordinary course of their various business activities, the Underwriters and their respective affiliates may make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt and equity securities (or related derivative securities) and financial instruments (which may include bank loans and/or credit default swaps) for their own account and for the accounts of their customers and may at any time hold long and short positions in such securities and instruments. Such investment and securities activities may involve securities and instruments of the Institution.
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC has entered into negotiated dealer agreements (each a “Dealer Agreement”) with each of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (“CS&Co.”) and LPL Financial LLC (“LPL”) for the retail distribution of certain securities offerings at the original issue prices. Pursuant to each Dealer Agreement, each of CS&Co. and LPL may purchase Bonds from J.P. Morgan Securities LLC at the original issue price less a negotiated portion of the selling concession applicable to any Bonds that such firm sells.
In addition, certain of the Underwriters have entered into distribution agreements with other broker-dealers (that have not been designated by the Institution as Underwriters) for the distribution of the Bonds at the original issue prices. Such agreements generally provide that the relevant Underwriter will share a portion of its underwriting compensation or selling concession with such broker-dealers.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
The Institution covenants in the Indenture that unless otherwise available on the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s Electronic Municipal Market Access system (“EMMA”) or any successor thereto or to functions thereof, copies of the Institution’s audited financial statements will be posted on the Institution’s website at http://www.draper.com/Series_2018_Bonds.html (or such other website as the Institution shall direct the Bondholders) no later than 180 days after the end of the fiscal year.
APPROVAL OF LEGALITY
Legal matters incident to validity of the Bonds and certain other matters are subject to the approving opinion of Goodwin Procter LLP, counsel to the Institution. The proposed form of opinion of counsel to the Institution relating to the validity of the issuance of the Bonds and certain other matters is attached hereto as APPENDIX D. In addition, certain other legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriters by their counsel, McCarter & English, LLP.
14
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The financial statements of the Institution presented in APPENDIX B present the financial position, changes in net assets and cash flows as of June 30, 2017. These financial statements should be read in their entirety.
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The financial statements of the Institution as of June 30, 2017 and July 1, 2016 and for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2017, included in APPENDIX B of this Offering Memorandum, have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent accountants, as stated in their report appearing herein.
RATING
Moody’s has assigned a rating of “Aa3” with a stable outlook on the Bonds. Any explanation of the significance of such rating may only be obtained from Moody’s. Generally, rating agencies base their ratings on information and materials furnished and on investigation, studies, and assumptions by the rating agencies. There is no assurance that the rating mentioned above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating might not be lowered or withdrawn entirely, if in the judgment of the rating agency originally establishing the rating, circumstances so warrant. Any such downward change in or withdrawal of a rating might have an adverse effect on the market price or marketability of the Bonds. A securities rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities.
MISCELLANEOUS
All quotations from and summaries and explanations of the Indenture and of other statutes and documents contained herein do not purport to be complete, and reference is made to said documents and statutes for full and complete statements of their provisions. Copies in reasonable quantity of the Indenture may be obtained upon request directed to the Underwriters or the Institution.
Any statements in this Offering Memorandum involving matters of opinion are intended as such and not as representations of fact. This Offering Memorandum is not to be construed as a contract or agreement between the Institution and Holders of any of the Bonds.
15
The execution and delivery of this Offering Memorandum has been duly authorized by the Institution.
THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC.
By: Kaigham J. Gabriel President and Chief Executive Officer
By: Elizabeth Mora Chief Administrative Officer and Treasurer
16 16 ME1 26584356v.5
APPENDIX A
March xx, 2018
In connection with issuance of its Taxable Bonds, Series 2018 (the “Bonds”), we are pleased to present information pertaining to The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. (“Draper” or the “Company”) for inclusion in the Offering Memorandum.
Introduction
At Draper, we believe exciting things happen when new capabilities are not just imagined — but actually created.
Draper is a Massachusetts not-for-profit engineering solutions company, focused on the design, development and deployment of advanced technological solutions for the most challenging and important problems facing the nation and the world. Whether formulating a system concept and developing each component to achieve a field-ready prototype or combining existing technologies in new ways, Draper’s multidisciplinary science and engineering teams deliver new capabilities to government and commercial customers.
Draper’s roots date to the 1930s, when Dr. Charles Stark Draper created a teaching laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) to develop the instrumentation needed to make precise measurements of angular and linear motion to improve airplane navigation. Draper was known for most of its first 40 years as the MIT Instrumentation Laboratory. It was renamed for its founder in 1970 and remained a part of MIT until 1973 when it became an independent, not-for-profit engineering research and development corporation.
From its early days, Draper established itself as a global leader in the development and early application of advanced guidance, navigation and control (“GN&C”) technologies to meet the needs of the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”). Draper’s record of achievements for the DoD and NASA include the design and development of the world’s most accurate and reliable guidance systems for undersea-launched ballistic missiles, intercontinental ballistic missiles, and the GN&C systems developed for the Apollo Space Program.
Draper technology guided U.S. astronauts during the Apollo program for all 17 missions, including nine missions to the moon and back. Since then, Draper technology has been a part of every crewed U.S. space mission. Draper’s pioneering work contributed substantially to the development of today’s complement of precise inertial sensors, software, and ultra-reliable systems —including digital fly by wire technology—that are critical for precision GN&C of commercial and military aircraft, submarines, strategic and tactical missiles, spacecraft, and un-crewed vehicles.
A-1
Autonomous systems are another area of expertise at Draper. The Company has more than 60 years of experience in designing, testing and delivering fault-tolerant autonomy in high- stakes arenas, from space to undersea. For example, the Draper-developed Timeliner™ automation software is used aboard the International Space Station and the Company’s autonomous mission management software demonstrations have included a number of autonomy firsts.
Draper has made numerous contributions to the Microelectromechanical System (“MEMS”) field and has developed applications for both military and commercial needs. Draper’s pioneering work and contributions to MEMS technology began in 1984. Draper engineers were the first to demonstrate measurement of angular rate with a silicon MEMS double-gimbal gyro. MEMS-based guidance systems designed subsequently by Draper have been demonstrated successfully in a number of guided munitions programs and onboard an Air Force spacecraft, which represented the first practical application of a MEMS gyro in space.
Draper Today
In 2015, then new President and CEO of Draper, Dr. Kaigham J. Gabriel, realigned the Company’s strategy to broaden the impact of Draper’s people, resources and work by: (i) investing in the organization to support changes in DoD and national security funding and needs; (ii) leveraging the Company’s non-profit mission to find new sponsorship to solve global challenges; and (iii) increasing engagement with commercial innovation.
Draper continues to expand its capabilities to solve problems of national importance in the areas of defense, space, biomedical, energy and transport systems. Draper’s success in adapting to the evolving needs of its customers has been foundational to the pioneering achievements of its past. This approach continues to enable Draper to contribute to and envision new solutions for its customers, including in its work:
applying sensors, modeling and simulation, radiation hardening, and survivability to precision targeting and missile avionics development for the Missile Defense Agency; designing flight control hardware and software for the Dream Chaser® Cargo System spacecraft; increasing perception and dexterous functionality for robots; developing Human Organ Systems platforms for testing drugs safely on a proxy for female reproductive system that uses human organ tissue for accurate results; enabling faster and less costly biomanufacturing of CAR-T cell therapies and a breath-analysis tool to detect invasive aspergillosis rapidly (now in human testing); and creating a chip-scale LiDAR sensor that can image obstacles at a greater distance with higher resolution than existing commercial LiDARs—a capability critical to improving the safety and performance of autonomous motor vehicles.
A-2
Draper employs approximately 1,100 technical staff; more than half of whom possess graduate degrees in engineering and science and more than 90% of whom work at the Company’s principal facility in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Key to Draper's innovation culture are the multidisciplinary engineering and scientific teams executing on customer and internal projects; the extensive and diverse laboratory facilities and equipment; and the breadth of experience and expertise within one organization.
In fiscal year 2017, Draper had $571.8 million in total revenue across three major program areas: Strategic Systems; National Security & Space (“NS&S”); and Commercial Programs. Internal revenue, which excludes subcontractor pass-through amounts, was $381.7 million:
Strategic Systems accounted for approximately 48% of internal revenue, with the bulk from work Draper delivers as the prime contractor on guidance, navigation and control for the Navy’s Fleet Ballistic Missile Program (a program Draper has supported on a sole-source basis since 1963). Another 48% of internal revenue was from NS&S programs, representing a mix of contracts from DoD, NASA, the intelligence community, the defense industry and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (“DARPA”). As space exploration and operation has become commercialized, NS&S also supports start- up space companies, such as BridgeSat, with its system architecture optimization, and more established companies, such as Sierra Nevada Corporation, with large- mission activities including Cargo ReSupply (“CRS”) to the International Space Station. The final 4% of revenue is from Commercial programs, primarily from research and development contract work from private-sector companies (such as Colgate- Palmolive, Pfizer, and Autoliv) focused in two major areas: (i) biomedical solutions and pharmaceuticals research and testing; and (ii) transport systems and energy infrastructure.
GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT
Board of Directors and Members
Draper is governed by a Board of 12 Directors (the “Board”). The Members of the Corporation elect the Directors at the annual meeting of the Company. The Board of Directors, in turn, elects its Chairman and the Officers. New Members are elected for up to three-year terms by existing Members at an annual meeting. Membership in the Company consisted of 45 persons as of October 3, 2017. A maximum age limit of 72 applies to both Members and Directors. Director terms are limited to nine consecutive one- year terms, however, a Director may be reelected following a hiatus of at least one year. The only Director who is also an employee is Draper’s President and CEO. The Company’s Officers manage its day-to-day operations.
A-3
The Board holds regular meetings four times per fiscal year, provides compliance oversight of Draper’s programs and services, sets broad governance policies and objectives, and formally evaluates Draper’s overall performance each year through functional committees. This governance helps ensure that resources are managed effectively and in a fiscally responsible way.
Draper’s Directors and their principal business or professional affiliations as of January 31, 2018 are as follows: DIRECTOR DIRECTOR SINCE PRINCIPAL AFFILIATION
Franklin C. Miller, Chairman 2009 Independent Consultant and Principal, the Scowcroft of the Board Group; Former Special Assistant to the President
Kaigham (Ken) J. Gabriel 2014 President & CEO, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.
David B. Aronoff 2015 General Partner, Flybridge Capital Partners
Lena G. Goldberg 2013 James M. Collins Senior Lecturer, Harvard Business School; Retired, Executive Vice President & General Counsel, Fidelity Investments
Daniel E. Hastings 2010 CEO and Director, Singapore MIT Alliance for Research & Technology; Cecil and Ida Green Education Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems, MIT
Francis H. Kearney 2015 Lieutenant General, United States Army (Retired); President, Inside-Solution-LLC; Senior Advisor, Faculty and Board Member, Thayer Leader Development Group
Joanne M. Maguire 2013 Retired Executive Vice President, Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company
Gary S. May 2017 Chancellor, University of California – Davis; Former Dean, College of Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
John T. Mitchell 2017 Rear Admiral, United States Navy (Retired)
David R. Shedd 2015 Former Acting Director of the National Intelligence Agency; Consultant, Faith Without Borders
D. Richard Williams 2017 Chairman, Primerica, Inc.
M. Elizabeth Young 2017 Rear Admiral, United States Navy (Retired)
The Board of Directors has five committees: Audit, Budget, Finance, Human Resources and Compensation Policy (each consisting of five Directors); and Nominating and Governance (consisting of four Directors). Draper’s President and CEO serves on the Nominating and Governance Committee (ex officio).
A-4
Executive Management
The day-to-day operations of Draper are the responsibility of the President and CEO and his or her staff. The staff includes the corporate officers who are responsible for developing and executing Draper’s business and strategic plans and fulfilling programs for their respective business areas.
Draper’s principal officers are:
Dr. Kaigham (Ken) J. Gabriel, President and CEO. Since October 2014, Dr. Gabriel has been the President and CEO of The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. and has served since October 2017 as Interim Vice President of NS&S following the retirement of the prior VP.
The President’s staff also includes the General Counsel, the Principal Director of Strategic Communication & Government Affairs and the Director of Strategic Technical Opportunities.
Dr. Gabriel was most recently co-founder of the Advanced Technology and Projects group at Google, after he joined the organization in 2012 as Corporate Vice President of Google/Motorola Mobility. From 2009 to 2012, Dr. Gabriel was Deputy and Acting Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (“DARPA”) of DoD where he led an agency with an annual budget of $3 billion charged with managing the DoD’s most cutting-edge projects.
Between 2002 and 2009, Dr. Gabriel, widely regarded as the architect of the MEMS industry, was the Co-Founder, Chairman and Chief Technology Officer of Akustica, a semiconductor company that commercialized MEMS audio devices and sensors. Akustica pioneered the use of digital silicon microphones and shipped more than six million units to the consumer electronics industry prior to being acquired in 2009.
Dr. Gabriel was a tenured professor in both the Robotics Institute and the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. He also served as a program manager and office director at DARPA, where he conceived and led projects that took MEMS into practical applications. Earlier in his career, he was a visiting professor at the University of Tokyo, a research scientist at the Naval Research Laboratory, and a Research Principal Investigator at AT&T Bell Laboratories. Dr. Gabriel’s honors include being named a Technology Pioneer by the World Economic Forum at Davos, named to the Senior Executive Service, a position classification in the United States government civil service, and awarded the Carlton Tucker Prize for Excellence in Teaching from MIT.
Dr. Gabriel holds SM and ScD degrees in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from MIT.
A-5
Steven J. DiTullio, Vice President, Strategic Systems. Mr. DiTullio became Vice President for Strategic Systems at Draper in October 2012. In this capacity, Mr. DiTullio has responsibility for life-cycle support for the U.S. Navy’s Trident Missile guidance and reentry systems, Air Force Minuteman III instrument sustainment, and strategic IR&D programs. Mr. DiTullio was previously promoted to Principal Director for Strategic Systems in 2008 where he was responsible for all technical and programmatic oversight of the Trident II Life Extension Program.
Mr. DiTullio joined Draper following a five-year career with the U.S. Navy. In 1979, he was assigned to the U.S. Navy’s Nuclear Power program. While assigned to the USS George Bancroft SSBN 643 (G), Mr. DiTullio served in several Division Officer billets as well as being the Ship’s Communicator and Damage Control Assistant. Mr. DiTullio qualified as an Engineering Officer and retired from the Naval Reserves in 1992 as a Commander.
Upon joining Draper in 1984, Mr. DiTullio was assigned as a Systems Engineer working on the design of the Navy’s MK6 Mod 0 guidance system for the Trident II missile. In this role, Mr. DiTullio was responsible for coordination and checkout of the guidance system with the other Strategic Weapon System subsystems as well as the integration of the Trident II into the UK fleet. Mr. DiTullio was promoted to Program Manager in 1988 responsible for the planning and execution of the Technical Engineering Support for the MK6 Mod 0 guidance system. Upon being promoted to Associate Director for Strategic Programs in 2001, Mr. DiTullio lead Draper’s transition to becoming the prime contractor to Strategic Systems Programs for all aspects of the Guidance program.
Mr. DiTullio earned an MBA from Northeastern University and has a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from The Citadel.
Tara Clark, Vice President, Commercial Programs. Ms. Clark joined Draper in January 2016, bringing to Draper more than 25 years of experience in the commercialization of biomedical products. Prior to joining Draper, she was the North American General Manager for Miltenyi Biotec where she initiated and secured FDA approval for various medical devices, and established commercial launch strategies. Her successful navigation of the clinical and regulatory landscape enabled the advancement of one medical device from concept to FDA approval and drove double-digit revenue growth for each of 12 years.
Over the course of her career, she has served as a Director with Baxter Healthcare Corporation, where she launched novel medical devices and immune-therapeutics within the field of hematology/oncology. She was elected as the first Industry Representative to the International Society for Cellular Therapy Advisory Board, and is an active Member of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Recently, she was recognized by the Boston Business Journal as a “Woman to Watch in Science and Technology, 2017.”
Ms. Clark holds a degree in Microbiology from the University of Missouri-Columbia.
A-6
Richard J. Russell, Vice President of Engineering. Mr. Russell became Vice President of Engineering at Draper in February 2018. His appointment as a corporate officer is pending approval at the March 20, 2018 board meeting. His primary responsibilities include maintaining a world-class staff of engineers and scientists, developing technology and business strategies for advancing Draper’s capabilities and ensuring exemplary performance of customer projects. Prior to his present position, he held the position of Director of Materials Science and Microfabrication, a division which he founded. Mr. Russell was responsible for strategic and operational plan development, program execution oversight, technology investment and supervision of the Materials Science and Microfabrication organization at Draper. Prior to that, Mr. Russell was Director of Special Technology Solutions, which is responsible for advancing Draper’s Intelligence Community activities in sensors and communication systems, navigation, and advanced technical solutions.
Mr. Russell has been at Draper for more than 30 years, where he has held line management positions in Engineering and Program Management. His positions covered a variety of technical domains including all aspects of hardware design including Radio Frequency Communication Systems and Tags, Autonomous Undersea Mapping and Mine Hunting, Unattended Ground Sensors, Advanced Packaging Techniques and Fault Tolerant Computing. He was the former Director of Draper IR&D which gives him a view of all of Draper’s technology. He has worked in many domains from undersea manned and unmanned vehicles, space craft main computer control to tracking, tagging and locating devices for harsh environments.
Mr. Russell holds a MBA from Boston University and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from Tufts University.
Elizabeth Mora, Chief Administrative Officer (CAO), Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Ms. Mora manages Draper’s investment portfolio, currently more than $240 million, with an outside investment advisor. She also manages Draper’s real estate portfolio in Kendall Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts with multiple tenants. She oversees the administrative and financial functions of the Company including Finance, Human Resources, Contracts, Facilities, Real Estate, Information Technology and Internal Audit. Along with the CEO, she initiated a diversity effort at Draper and is responsible for spearheading a number of the Draper’s Employee Resource Groups that foster diversity and inclusion as a key element of recruitment and retention.
Ms. Mora is the former CFO of Harvard University where she was responsible for its large endowment, annual operating budget, and 15,000 employees. As CFO of Harvard University, she was responsible for overseeing risk management for the University, leading the financial analysis supporting Harvard’s development of its Allston, Massachusetts property, and serving on the University’s Management Company Board. She led the search for a new CEO of the Harvard Management Company in 2008. Prior to that, Ms. Mora spent nine years in public accounting and consulting at PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”), serving over 40 different university, research institute, and nonprofit clients as a manager in PwC’s National Regulatory Consulting Practice. In addition, she has extensive
A-7
experience serving on boards of directors. Currently she serves as Compensation Committee Chair and as an Audit Committee member for MKS Instruments (NASDAQ: MKSI). She has been a director of MKS since 2012. She also serves as Corporate Responsibility Chair for GCP Applied Technologies (NYSE: GCP) where she has been a director since 2016.
Ms. Mora holds a Bachelor of Arts from the University of California, Berkeley and an MBA from the Simmons Graduate School of Management. She is also a CPA in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
STAFF
As of June 30, 2017, Draper had a total of 1,673 employees, including 1,096 technical staff and 223 technical support staff that predominantly charge their time directly to customer programs, and 354 finance and administration staff that are typically charged to projects through an overhead rate.
As of June 30, 2017, there were 157 members of The Research, Development and Technical Employees' Union (RDTEU) employed by Draper. The current contract with the union commenced June 24, 2017 and will end on June 26, 2020. Draper considers its relationship with its employees to be good.
To meet its staffing needs, Draper competes effectively within the regional labor market and uses third-party compensation experts to develop a competitive compensation structure. In addition to competitive salaries, the Company also maintains a generous benefits program including a defined contribution retirement plan in which Draper contributes 10% of base pay and the employee is required to contribute 5% of base pay. Effective December 31, 2017, Draper froze its defined benefit plan which exclusively served the non-exempt, union population. These employees were moved into the defined contribution plan, achieving a uniform retirement benefit offering for all non-officer employees.
Draper reports a defined benefit obligation on its annual financial statement on three separate plans: Retirement Plan for Employees (frozen as of 12/31/2017), Retirement Plan for Staff Members (frozen as of 12/31/2008) and the Supplemental Retirement Plan for Corporate Officers (open). As of June 30, 2017, the benefit obligations owed under the three defined benefit pension plans, calculated under generally accepted accounting
A-8
principles, was approximately $135.1 million, with $107.5 million funded. There were no pension funding requirements for the 2016 and 2017 fiscal years. While the amount of any future contributions cannot yet be determined, management does not anticipate a material adverse effect on Draper’s financial position or results of operations from any future funding requirements.
Retiree medical benefit obligations totaled, as of June 30, 2017, approximately $24.3 million, of which approximately $19.0 million was funded. The funding of the medical plan is expected to continue on an as-incurred basis.
BUSINESS AREAS
To capitalize on Draper’s diversified wealth of multidisciplinary engineering and scientific expertise, the following business areas have been created to best steward the Company’s more than 80-year relationship with government sponsors and to promote new business opportunities by aligning Draper’s technology solutions with its customer’s ever shifting problem-solving needs.
Strategic Systems
Draper is the prime contractor for the guidance systems used on the U.S Navy’s submarine- launched ballistic missiles (“SLBM”). Draper is also responsible for the sustainment of the inertial accelerometers used in the guidance system in the Air Force’s Minuteman III (“MMIII”) intercontinental ballistic missiles (“ICBM”). Additional programs related to missile GN&C, submarine navigation, nuclear weapon security, miniature inertial measuring units, and radiation-hard technologies are outgrowths of the Company’s long history with these sponsors. Strategic Systems generated approximately 48% of Draper’s internal revenue (total revenue less subcontracted expenses) in fiscal 2017.
Modernizing the Nation’s Strategic Missile Guidance Systems. Draper has been the U.S. Air Force’s and U.S. Navy’s design agent for land-based and SLBM guidance since the
A-9
1950s. As the prime contractor for the Navy’s current Trident D5 missile guidance system, Draper manages the MK6 (Mark 6) guidance system Life Extension, or MK6 MOD1, development and production team of more than 650 engineers from Draper and its major subcontractors as it modernizes the missile’s inertial guidance system. The goal is to upgrade 575 systems through 2024, which will extend the guidance system service life to 2042 while lowering the Navy’s future maintenance and support costs. Production work for this contract is completed at a Government Owned, Contractor Operated (“GOCO”) facility in Pittsfield, MA, in which Draper is the sole Contractor-operator. The MK6 MOD1 utilizes a modular architecture that will allow for future modifications required to support the Ohio Replacement Submarine service life of 2080. Draper continues to maintain the MK6 guidance system currently deployed in the Trident submarine fleet.
Advancing GN&C: Technology for Reentry Vehicles and Interceptors. In addition to maintaining deployed strategic systems and modernizing existing systems, Draper is expanding into other government needs by developing the GN&C technology needed for shipboard navigation and to enable Conventional Prompt Strike (“CPS”) capability to deliver non-nuclear payloads with high accuracy to virtually anywhere on the globe in less than one hour. Draper is also supporting several Missile Defense Agency (“MDA”) initiatives, developing another major customer area for the Strategic Systems directorate, primarily in the area of radiation hardened GN&C to enable advanced interceptors.
Defense Systems
The Defense Systems program office develops new solutions and builds on emerging commercial products and technology to develop, and ensure operational deployment, of next generation solutions that provide military advantage. The emphasis is to address the national security needs of U.S. military forces in the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps. Defense Systems is a portfolio of four businesses; three sponsor-focused businesses and an Advanced Technology business centered on DoD Science and Technology markets. Revenues generated by the Defense Systems business area were approximately 20% of internal revenue (total revenue less subcontracted expense) in fiscal year 2017.
Defense Systems’ multi-domain areas address critical shortfalls of capability within defense acquisition markets:
Combat Solutions: advances the combat effectiveness of land forces in overmatch situations, addressing physical and cognitive resources of the small military unit; Mission Systems: develops sensors, processing, and electronics solutions to counter an adversary’s air, sea, and spectrum anti-access, area-denial strategy; Secure Systems: protects the critical technology in the embedded processing of military systems from compromise and exploitation. Draper’s solutions in these areas help meet the urgent needs of U.S. national security and defense; and Advanced Technology: develops promising capabilities to enable generation-after- next solutions. Advanced technologies are being developed in the areas of atomic
A-10
physics enabled instrumentation, sensing and robotics, GPS-denied navigation, air vehicle autonomy, cybersecurity, and secure processing.
Space Systems
Draper’s space programs focus on the need for advanced development of high-performance and highly reliable flight systems. Draper Space Systems business area leverages expertise in GN&C to address the future needs of human space exploration, space science, and commercial space applications. Future vehicles and missions will require combinations of advanced GN&C technologies, including high performance, high reliability, significant autonomy, and low-weight, low-power avionics. Revenues generated by the Space Systems business area were approximately 9% of total internal revenue (total revenue less subcontracted expenses) in fiscal year 2017.
Human Space Exploration and Operations. Continuing its long history with the U.S. human space program, Draper plays a key role in the operation of the International Space Station (“ISS”). The Company’s Timeliner™ automation software operates on the ISS. Additionally, as part of NASA’s developing human space program that will return humans to the Moon, and eventually to send them to Mars, Draper is supporting the development of the next generation of human exploration vehicles and programs aimed at developing technology to support deep space missions (biomedical, extravehicular activity, and advanced GN&C). Space Science. Draper works with scientists to develop advanced systems for astrophysics, Earth, planetary and helio-physics missions. Draper is a key member of the Osiris REX, Parker Solar Probe, and CYGNSS funded programs. Commercial Space. Draper is developing critical technology to enable new commercial space systems. The Robotic Servicing of GEO Spacecraft is a public/private partnership with DARPA that will establish a first of a kind repair capability of GEO spacecraft. Draper is leveraging technology developed from previous government and Draper IR&D funding to provide rendezvous and proximity operations GN&C as well as autonomous mission management.
Special Programs
Draper’s Special Programs Directorate develops new technology and prototype systems for U.S. Government Intelligence, Counter Terrorism, and Homeland Security customers. Draper provides early stage concept development, proof-of-principal demonstration prototypes, first manufacturing articles, and manufacturing documentation for transitioning these systems to full operation. Draper also provides low-rate production and field support for systems whose quantity, technology, or security restrictions are not amenable to large volume production. The Company’s systems address its customers’ most difficult operational needs in communications, navigation, miniature electronics, precision sensors, robotics, cyber security, and data analytics. Revenues generated by the Special Programs
A-11
business area were approximately 19% of internal revenue (total revenue less subcontracted expenses) in fiscal year 2017.
Communications, Navigation, and Miniaturization. Draper’s radio frequency, vision-based, and inertial navigation systems push the limits of small size and operational capability in highly challenging environments. The Company’s advanced packaging and efficient algorithm technologies and its end-to-end system-level approach to miniaturization enable these ultra-dense systems to provide ever increasingly complex functionality without burdening users with increased size, power, and weight. The special purpose communications protocols developed by Draper enable new modes of operation for customers, and significantly extend the limits of current state of technology in this area. Sensor Systems. Draper researches, develops, and produces low-rate quantities of compact sensors and sensitive instrumentation systems to provide superior capabilities for military operations. The Company’s advanced technology portfolio results in system capabilities that are superior in size, weight, power, and performance to capabilities developed using commercially-available technologies. Draper also develops robotic systems to precisely deliver sensors to dangerous environments. Using autonomous, multimodal navigation technologies and precision guidance algorithms, these systems extend the reach of Draper’s sensors while keeping operators at a safe distance. Small Electronics and Mechanisms. Draper maintains a leading role in developing ultra-miniature electronics, electro-mechanical and mechanical systems with a broad range of applications. Draper continues to pioneer multichip module technology for compact electronics packaging, including developing novel methods for employing heterogeneous technology components and demonstrating unprecedented levels of system integration. These technologies provide performance advantages for Draper’s larger scale integrated systems. Data Analytics. Draper develops advanced technology capabilities for intelligence personnel to make decisions quickly and effectively in situations where the quantity and complexity of the data to be analyzed is overwhelming for human operators. Combining big-data analytic tools with machine learning algorithms and human- centered engineering, these innovative methods are approaching technology readiness levels for operational transition and deployment. Cyber Vulnerability Assessment. Special Programs is developing next-generation analysis tools that help to ensure the security of embedded systems by finding and fixing subtle software defects, safeguarding personal electronics and infrastructure from attack. Draper is also developing fundamentally new approaches to cyber protection for the Internet of Things (systems that are connected to the internet other than through networked computers, such as wireless sensors). Draper’s technology, called the Inherently Secure Processor, protects systems from entire classes of exploits at the hardware processer level. Draper recently licensed this technology to a start-up entity that had been incubated at Draper.
A-12
Biomedical Systems
Draper’s Biomedical Systems Office (“BSO”) exploits the synergy between engineering and the life sciences to design, develop and test innovative solutions to many pressing healthcare issues. Draper partners with leading medical research, device and pharmaceutical organizations such as Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Pfizer to develop innovative microfluidic platforms and medical devices for both medical research and clinical markets. The BSO leverages Draper’s nearly 90 years of experience in instrumentation, sensors and microfluidics to develop devices that are ideally suited for the manufacture of emerging therapies, including those targeted at the cellular and molecular level. The goal of Draper’s work is to reduce the cost of health care and improve patient outcomes through providing better drug discovery R&D tools, faster, less costly, and safer personalized medicine and more rapid diagnostics and treatments. Revenues generated by the Biomedical Systems business area were approximately 3% of total internal revenue (total revenue less subcontracted expenses) in fiscal year 2017.
Draper is a device, or technology “enabler” for researchers within the academic research institutions, hospitals and commercial ecosystems. Draper’s approach is to identify emerging market needs, and apply its broad engineering expertise to translate ideas to working proof-of-concept prototypes that can be tested by collaborators. Draper has developed deep expertise in novel:
engineered biological systems including human organ systems, and gene editing platforms; fluidics and micro fluidics, including blood perfusion systems; specialized physical and biological sensors; real-time data acquisition, processing, and data fusion into decisions; design and fabrication of clinical-grade medical device prototypes; and hermetic packaging methods, including those that enable implantable bioelectronics.
Under contract with Pfizer and other leading commercial companies, Draper is developing technologies to address rapid diagnosis of infectious pathogens, human organ systems, cell processing and gene editing systems for precision medicine, medical devices for dialysis and lung assist, and implantable devices to treat brain injury and other neurological disorders.
Transport and Energy Systems
Draper’s Transport and Energy Office leverages Draper’s capability in sensors, position, navigation and timing controls and highly reliable systems to develop innovative solutions. Draper is heavily involved with key automotive stakeholders. Using its heritage and expertise in autonomous navigation in the advancement of self-driving cars, Draper works side-by-side with its customers’ engineers and scientists to design and prototype
A-13
autonomous components and systems that are then integrated into commercially marketed vehicles for its customer’s evaluation. Often, Draper engineers take these solutions to the field for further integration and testing. Draper’s success is measured by the advancement of innovative technology toward commercialization.
Within the Energy sector, Draper has worked with leading utility and oil and gas companies to design and deploy a system for measuring corrosion in the miles of distribution pipelines in the United States. The first commercial product to be deployed within the industry is Draper’s WiSense Magnetometry System, which continually monitors the erosion of iron- based pipes in regions that are known to be at high risk, without shutting down the pipeline as is required with other systems. This product is expected to be deployed worldwide in 2019 by a leading oil and gas service provider. Draper is also working with these customers to develop protective devices to prevent blow-outs within refinery operations. Revenues generated by the Transport and Energy business areas were approximately 1% of Draper’s total internal revenue (total revenue less subcontracted expenses) in fiscal year 2017.
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
A distinguishing feature of Draper is its ability to bring the full-spectrum of engineering resources to solve customer problems. The Company can take a problem from concept to development and oversee the technology transfer and license the technology, if appropriate. Draper has nurtured a highly skilled and motivated work force supported by a network of exceptional design, fabrication, and test facilities. This combination of highly trained technical talent and state-of-the-art facilities enables Draper not only to deliver the design and development of first-of-a-kind systems incorporating innovative technology, but also to offer high-value-added engineering services to a broad range of government and commercial customers. Draper transfers its technology developments to both government and commercial customers, depending on the source, purpose, and contractual agreements governing the original development.
Typically for a government customer, Draper assists the customer in transferring its technology to industry for production. In the case of its work as the design agent for the U.S. Navy’s strategic missile guidance, for example, Draper, with active participation from partners, transitions a proven design package to an industrial team and oversees the successful manufacturing, deployment, and fleet support of the systems. In other cases, Draper licenses its designs to a partner.
Draper also enables the public to benefit from its intellectual property (“IP”) by licensing it to companies that commit to make products incorporating that IP available to the public. Draper has successfully licensed its IP to both large, established companies and startups.
Another way Draper contributes to the innovation economy is by spinning out technologies when they mature to a point where their continued development and sustainment can be funded commercially. Last August, Draper assisted with the formation of, and licensed
A-14
technology to, Dover Microsystems, Inc. Dover had been incubated at Draper and will provide the commercial sector with access to novel hardware-based cyber security, while Draper continues to focus on the defense and national security market.
INTERNAL RESEARCH, EDUCATION AND OTHER ACTIVITIES
Draper's internal research and development (“IR&D”) philosophy is to approach big problems in which radically different approaches from the mainstream can produce exponential improvements over current technology, or even solutions where none existed previously. In each of the last three fiscal years, the Company has spent $20-25 million on IR&D at Draper and through an active collaboration philosophy to bring in expertise in areas outside of the Company’s own focus. More broadly, Draper regularly teams with academic researchers around the country, having worked with more than 40 colleges and universities in lead and subcontractor roles over this time period. Draper’s IR&D program is committed to accelerating the growth of critical technologies that management anticipates will meet the near- and long-term requirements of Draper’s customers while allowing the Company to continuously refresh its core competencies.
As a not-for-profit, one of Draper's core commitments is giving back, through a variety of mechanisms. Draper’s investment in IR&D is but one example of this. In another, Draper's Sembler initiative supports regional technology start-ups by providing access to a variety of resources, including fabrication and prototyping, testing and characterization, and mentoring and guidance from advanced technical experts. These partnerships position Draper and the technology startups to take on larger challenges together than either company could take on alone.
Advanced technical education has remained a key component of Draper's mission since Draper became independent from MIT in 1973. In the last 44 years, the flagship Draper Fellow Program has supported over 1,000 graduate students pursuing advanced degrees in technical areas of interest to Draper. Draper Fellows work closely with Draper technical staff to develop state-of-the-art technologies in world-class laboratories, and their scholarly outputs often go beyond top-tier journal papers and conference presentations to include prototypes, testbeds, and field implementations.
In the 2017-2018 academic year, Draper is supporting more than 60 Fellows in graduate programs at multiple universities in the Draper Fellow Program and two graduate students in the inaugural joint Hertz-Draper Fellowship, part of the prestigious Hertz Foundation Fellowship Program, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to empowering America’s most brilliant scientific minds. Draper also supports undergraduate and high school students through various internship and co-op programs.
A-15
The Draper Prize for Engineering
The Charles Stark Draper Prize for Engineering was established and endowed by Draper Laboratory in 1988 in tribute to its founder, Dr. Charles Stark Draper, who pioneered the development of inertial navigation and was the founder of Draper (as the MIT Instrumentation Laboratory). The Prize is intended to honor those who have contributed to the advancement of engineering and to improve public understanding of the importance of engineering and technology.
Administered by the National Academy of Engineering, the international prize, one of the world’s preeminent awards for engineering achievement, honors an engineer whose accomplishment has “significantly impacted society by improving the quality of life, providing the ability to live freely and comfortably, and/or permitting the access to information.” The $500,000 prize is awarded biennially and recognizes achievements in all engineering disciplines.
Fifty-four engineers have been honored with the prize over the 29 years since its founding. Collectively, they have contributed to the invention and application of 22 technologies, including the development of the integrated circuit, world-wide web, the internet, satellite communications, drug-delivery systems, cellular telephone systems and networks.
Engineering Impact
Draper’s Engineering Impact is the Company’s newest undertaking to expand its history of service, by applying its substantial engineering capabilities to the world’s pressing social and humanitarian challenges. As an example, through Engineering Impact, The Canary Foundation has enabled Draper to apply its expertise in computer vision techniques, developed for intelligence gathering from satellite imaging, to address fundamental limitations of today’s cancer detection tools.
Engineering Impact’s approach is to identify, develop, and execute projects in conjunction with partners working in specific challenge domains, ensuring that the Company is providing solutions with impact to meaningful problems. Draper and its partners work together from project ideation through implementation and release to ensure that the ultimate solution will be both deployable and sustainable. Approaches to sustainability range from including impacted populations as end users during development to open- source release of system designs. Areas in which the Company’s expertise is exceptionally well suited include measurement, evaluation, and decision systems supporting challenges in the environment and in education. Draper’s biotechnology capabilities enable both innovative medical devices and public and population health initiatives. The Company has a long history of innovative uses of big data analytics which is applicable across a wide range of problem spaces. Working in conjunction with its partners, Draper forms a unique resource to positively impact social and humanitarian challenges.
A-16
Outreach Programming
Draper Sponsorships. As Draper continues to grow its offerings within the commercial market, it has honed its corporate sponsorships over the past year to achieve two national goals: (i) to raise visibility of Draper and its offerings among potential partners and customers; and (ii) to increase Draper’s visibility among premier scientists and engineers who could contribute to advancing the development of capabilities in the national interest by joining Draper.
To that end, Draper entered sponsorship, or underwriting, agreements with PBS/NOVA and National Public Radio/Science Friday. These corporate sponsorships have been referenced by multiple recruits and new hires as well as new and potential customers, business partners, and potential major donors.
Draper Volunteers. Draper employees have a long history of service to the communities in which they work and live, and participate in group and individual volunteer opportunities in both community and civic organizations. The Company grants each employee eight hours of paid leave for volunteer activities each calendar year, and contributed almost 700 hours to local charitable organizations through this program in 2017.
Employee Giving. Draper’s charitable giving portal provides its employees with information and tools to make informed decisions to donate to the causes they care about. Employees receive a company match of up to $1,000 per calendar year and the Company runs an annual competition to bring attention to the program. Employees contributed $287,000 across 500 charitable organizations and disaster relief funds in 2017, to which Draper added $230,000 in matching funds.
Community Collaborations. Draper is a founding member of the Kendall Community Group, a collaboration of businesses and human services agencies designed to support local youth programs. A member of the Cambridge Chamber of Commerce, Draper was also a founding member of the Chamber’s Community Outreach Committee.
FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
Facilities
Draper owns and occupies 555 Technology Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts (the Duffy Building), which is a concrete and glass structure with varying heights of four, six and eight floors, constituting 18 cores of engineering laboratories and office space. This approximately 493,000 square foot building and adjacent 950-car garage are situated on approximately five acres and were constructed in the mid-1970s. The building and a portion of the garage were acquired by Draper in 2000. The building is located in the Kendall Square area of Cambridge, Massachusetts, which is an international center of
A-17
engineering, biomedical and pharmaceutical research, and is within walking distance of the MIT campus.
Over the last two years, Draper built a 32,000 square foot atrium and renovated approximately 104,000 square feet of office and laboratory spaces in the Duffy building, increasing employee capacity and improving workflows in the renovated spaces. The sleek architecture, ergo-dynamic furniture, visually appealing design and collaborative workspace configuration have greatly impacted the work environment in a positive way.
Draper also owns seven condominium units at One Hampshire at Kendall Square, a 371,000 square foot, seven story, concrete and glass laboratory and office complex on approximately 2.5 acres in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This building is connected to the Duffy Building via an enclosed pedestrian bridge. Currently, Draper-owned units constitute approximately 172,000 square feet of this complex, of which 94,000 square feet is leased to third parties and the remaining area is occupied by Draper. The south wing of this complex was constructed by Draper in 1984 and the addition of a north wing was completed in 2007. The entire building was converted to a condominium in conjunction with the north wing addition.
In St. Petersburg, Florida, Draper owns a 41,000 square foot laboratory facility for microelectronic fabrication. This free standing concrete and steel facility is a 50/50 mix of state-of-the-art Class 100 clean rooms and office space that were constructed in 2002 and purchased by Draper in 2008. This facility, and the equipment therein, is currently leased, in a lease-to-own arrangement, to a subcontractor engaged in manufacturing for Draper’s defense systems business.
Committed to providing best-in-class service to its customers across the country, Draper leases office space, or is granted space in close proximity to strategic customers. Current satellite offices include, but are not limited to: a Government Owned/Contractor Operated facility in Pittsfield, MA (Navy), St. Petersburg, FL (Special Operation Forces), Houston, TX (NASA), Huntsville, AL (MDA/NASA) and offices in the Washington D.C. area to foster and grow many partnerships serving the national interest. As of January 2018, Draper maintained a total of thirteen leased office spaces with a combined office space of approximately 211,000 square feet. Draper satellite offices are staffed with approximately 130 employees in both technical and administrative capacities.
Equipment
Draper is a full-spectrum engineering solutions company and therefore requires dedicated facilities and equipment to support activities encompassing basic research through prototype development and small batch production. The four components of this capability are: (i) systems engineering; (ii) hardware design and development; (iii) materials science; and (iv) algorithms and software. These capabilities are supported by state-of-the-art tools to maintain the Company’s position at the cutting edge of innovation.
A-18
FINANCIAL OPERATIONS
Contracts with government sponsors are Draper’s primary source of revenues. Draper also derives revenue from rent from real estate assets and IP licensing income. Unlike many research institutions in the higher education field, Draper does not generally rely on its entirely unrestricted investment portfolio to support operations.
Contracts
In fiscal 2017, Draper executed on approximately 337 active contracts totaling more than $3 billion in cumulative contract value. Committed, unexpended funding remaining on these contracts totaled $564 million as of June 30, 2017. This number represents remaining funds committed by sponsors to Draper for work on specific programs that will be performed in future periods.
Draper primarily performs research and development efforts under cost-type contracts for its various sponsors. Under these contracts, reimbursement is received for direct and indirect contract costs plus a fixed or incentive fee. Cost plus fixed fee contracts remained consistent on average from previous years, as a percentage of internal revenue, at approximately 50%, and cost plus incentive fee contracts at approximately 26% in fiscal 2017. Contract fees have averaged 5% - 6% of total revenue. Other contract types, such as cost reimbursable, cost plus award fee, fixed price, and time and material contracts comprise the remaining contract awards over the past five years. Draper’s fixed price contracts are predominately funded by long-standing customers, the Navy Strategic Systems Programs Office and NASA, and represent production efforts for technology developed over decades of research and development efforts. Other fixed price contracts and time and material contracts generally represent low risk programs requiring delivery of a final report, prototype demonstration, or hours of work, respectively. In fiscal 2017, fixed price and time and materials contracts represented approximately 22% of internal revenue.
Internal revenue by sponsor, as of the dates specified, is as follows:
Total Internal Revenue (excludes subcontracts) June 28, June 27, June 26, July 1, June 30, 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Navy 49% 47% 49% 54% 50% Air Force / Army 12% 11% 21% 15% 13% Other National Security 23% 24% 12% 11% 10% NASA 5% 4% 4% 4% 7% Other DOD 6%4%6%9%12% Other Non-DOD 5% 10% 8% 8% 9% Total: 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Note: numbers presented in the above table may not add precisely to 100% due to rounding.
A-19
The period of performance on any given contract can vary depending on the customer and work being performed. Average contract tenor as of June 30, 2017 was 2.2 years. Additionally, contract option years can be utilized to streamline the renewal of multi-year programs. This is especially prevalent with the Navy Strategic Systems Program.
Due to the specialized nature of Draper’s work, approximately half of the Company’s total revenue is sole source, that is, awarded without competition. Pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulations 6.302, government sponsors are permitted to source suppliers without full and open competition in certain circumstances. Such circumstances applicable to Draper include when only one responsible source, and no other supplies or services, will satisfy agency requirements, or when disclosure of an agency’s needs would compromise national security unless the agency is permitted to limit the number of sources from which it solicits bids or proposals. Draper also benefits, as a non-profit, from the exemption that allows contracting without competition to establish or maintain an essential engineering, research or development capability provided by an educational or other non-profit institution.
Draper’s focus in a number of its programs is on high-impact, one-of-a-kind systems that are nationally important. Most of Draper’s sole source work has been granted on a non- competitive basis since the 1960s. Any follow-on work to sole-source contracts may also be granted without competition.
All payments to Draper for work performed on contracts with agencies of the U.S. Government are provisional payments which are subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”). Draper has final audited rates through its fiscal year 2015. Draper’s fiscal year 2016 rates are not yet finalized and for fiscal year 2016, DCAA questioned costs of $9.5 million with penalties of $6.5 million for a maximum exposure of $16.0 million. Draper has provided additional support for the claimed costs, which Management believes are reimbursable in accordance with Federal acquisition regulations. The Defense Contract Management Agency has conducted fact finding diligence on the results of DCAA’s audit and has a five-year statute of limitations to conclude this matter.
Draper’s subcontract revenue results from work performed by third parties in support of Draper’s contracts with its sponsors. Over 90% of subcontracts are associated with Draper’s Fleet Ballistic Missile Program for the U.S. Navy, which includes the MK6 MOD1 program and ongoing maintenance of the deployed fleet, where the production activities are performed by other entities under subcontracts from Draper. Fees attributable to subcontracting activity are reflected in Draper’s internal revenue.
The production phase of the MK MOD1 program caps a 10-year development program and is expected to extend beyond 2024. Draper is the prime contractor for this program and the ongoing repair and maintenance of the deployed guidance systems, which represent the largest sources of annual revenue for the program. Although the program is funded through annual contracts, which include one-to-two option years for certain elements of the work,
A-20
management expects it to continue as a sole-source program for the foreseeable future. Mandatory mission success, plus unique skills and facilities offered by Draper, create a high market entry barrier to other potential competitors.
Other Income
Draper’s other sources of income include IP licensing and leases of laboratory and office space in its One Hampshire Street condominium in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Approximately 70,300 square feet of the One Hampshire Street facility is leased to a single entity through 2019, excluding renewal options. In addition, approximately 23,400 square feet is leased to another tenant under terms expiring in September 2019. The terms of these arrangements are planned out by Draper in anticipation of future space needs of its own.
A-21
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following summary of financial information for Draper is derived from its financial statements for the fiscal years ended 2013 through 2017, inclusive.
Statement of Activities The following table is a summary statement of activities for each of the fiscal years in the five year period ended June 30, 2017.
Fiscal Years Ended (in thousands) June 28, June 27, June 26, July 1, June 30, 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Operating revenues Reimbursement of contract costs $ 504,046 502,644$ 543,518$ 598,546$ $ 546,459 Contract fees and capital facilities allowances 22,124 17,865 21,129 24,004 25,027 Other income 1,469 1,540 1,212 646 340 Total operating revenues 527,639 522,049 565,859 623,196 571,826
Operating expenses Direct costs Subcontracts 216,792 220,849 260,477 280,445 190,119 Salaries and wages 95,527 93,640 94,138 104,610 113,973 Employee benefits 27,545 27,340 27,808 28,977 33,774 Materials, services and rentals 21,474 18,136 21,928 29,441 31,459 Other, principally travel and equipment 29,205 28,896 26,828 34,611 43,807 Total direct costs 390,543 388,861 431,179 478,084 413,132
Indirect costs Salaries and wages 58,538 62,917 65,941 73,977 84,508 Employee benefits and vacations 29,420 31,515 31,892 32,845 37,097 Materials, services and rentals 16,662 16,662 21,014 28,947 28,928 Depreciation and amortization 18,480 18,565 17,398 15,195 15,346 Facilities, communications, unallowables, and other 9,498 11,781 24,626 9,070 29,988 Total indirect costs 132,598 141,440 160,871 160,034 195,867 Interest expense and fees 4,473 4,476 3,179 1,356 1,333 Total operating expenses 527,614 534,777 595,229 639,474 610,332 Increase (decrease) in unrestricted net assets from operations 25 (12,728) (29,370) (16,278) (38,506)
Non-operating gains (losses) Investment income, realized and unrealized gains (losses) 22,579 34,793 13,504 (5,597) 35,194 Gain on sale of building, net - - - 58,224 - Other non-operating income, net 7,706 7,236 6,072 1,118 (609) Other changes in pension and post retirement benefits 21,405 (1,028) 12,599 (23,191) 27,450 Total non-operating gains (losses), net 51,690 41,001 32,175 30,554 62,035 Increase (decrease) in unrestricted net assets 51,715 28,273 2,805 14,276 23,529 Unrestricted net assets, beginning of year 282,069 333,784 362,057 364,862 379,138 Unrestricted net assets, end of year 333,784$ 362,057$ 364,862$ 379,138$ $ 402,667
Note: Internal revenue (total revenue, less subcontractor costs) $ 310,847 $ 301,200 $ 305,382 $ 342,751 $ 381,707 Internal revenue growth 3.1% -3.1% 1.4% 12.2% 11.4%
A-22
Balance Sheet
The following table shows the balance sheet as of year-end for each of the fiscal years in the five-year period ended June 30, 2017.
Fiscal Years Ended (in thousands) June 28, June 27, June 26, July 1, June 30, 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents 52,111$ $ 74,476 56,203$ 51,678$ 21,398$ Accounts receivable, net 39,572 29,867 38,222 33,807 52,840 Unbilled contract costs and fees, net 47,147 48,415 57,279 69,554 56,018 Other current assets 6,775 9,543 9,343 9,766 11,350 Total current assets 145,605 162,301 161,047 164,805 141,606
Long-term investments 202,173 236,694 216,679 270,628 248,708 Long-term accounts receivable ----4,538 Note receivable - - - 2,014 455 Capital Leases (net of allowance) - - - 12,167 3,500 Deferred charges and other assets 8,381 7,944 8,182 2,874 2,037 Deferred financing costs, net 539 508 481 - - Prepaid pension benefits 5,406 6,857 7,409 7,641 9,328 Property and equipment, net 185,751 181,363 176,738 152,207 203,003 Total Assets $ 547,855 595,667$ 570,536$ 612,336$ 613,175$
Liabilities and Unrestricted Net Assets Current liabilities Accounts payable and accrued contract costs $ 35,775 $ 31,120 43,217$ 54,606$ 38,777$ Accrued compensation and related expenses 23,851 25,697 25,455 26,268 30,883 Current portion of bond payable - - - 2,770 2,790 Other accrued expenses 9,335 9,976 9,687 9,283 9,873 Total current liabilities 68,961 66,793 78,359 92,927 82,323
Accrued post retirement benefits 38,944 43,012 35,850 61,468 42,248 Bonds payable, net 79,240 79,301 48,370 45,150 42,392 Deferred revenue and other long term liabilities 26,926 44,504 43,095 33,653 43,545 Total Liabilities 214,071 233,610 205,674 233,198 210,508
Unrestricted Net Assets 333,784 362,057 364,862 379,138 402,667 Total Liabilities and Unrestricted Net Assets $ 547,855 595,667$ 570,536$ 612,336$ 613,175$
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Statement of Activities
Fiscal Year 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year 2016 – Total operating revenues ended FY17 at $571.8 million, a $51.4 million, or 8.2%, decrease from FY16. This decrease was driven by an anticipated decline in subcontractor cost on Navy support and production work, partially offset by an increase in internal revenue, calculated by taking gross revenue less subcontractor cost, of $39.0 million, or 11.4%. The increase in internal revenue was primarily driven by NS&S’ growth in space and defense systems.
A-23
An increase in other indirect cost of $20.9 million, compared to prior year, was due, in part, to a one-time capital lease impairment, incremental advertising expenses, and higher legal expenses.
Investment income, realized and unrealized gains, as reported in the financial statements, showed a significant increase of $40.8 million from FY16 due to market gains. Other non- operating income, net, includes tenant income, corpus advisory fees paid and gain/loss on sale of assets.
Non-operating income gains from change in pension and post-retirement benefits, increased by $50.6 million driven by an increase in the actuarial discount rate and greater- than-expected asset growth.
Fiscal Year 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year 2015 – In FY16, Draper recognized total revenue of $623.2 million, an increase of $57.3 million, or 10.1%, over FY15. This increase was primarily driven by subcontractor activity on Navy support and production work increasing revenue $20.0 million from FY15. Internal revenue, calculated by taking gross revenue less subcontractor cost, was $342.8 million at fiscal year-end, a $37.4 million, or 12.2% increase from FY15. An increase in headcount produced chargeable cost in salaries and wages, employee benefits, and other direct cost. The increase was attributed to the NS&S area with work on several programs for the Air Force and Army and work for Strategic Systems with DARPA. In addition, Draper’s Commercial programs achieved revenue of $18.2 million for the year. This work was with customers such as Shell, DARPA and AutoLiv and some mid-sized commercial pharmaceutical companies.
At the beginning of FY16, Draper recognized a $58.2 million net gain on sale of an ownership position in condominium units at its One Hampshire Street facility in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Total sale price was $89.5 million. This transaction also contributed to a reduction in rental income affecting other non-operating income, net.
The non-operating gains driven by the change in pension and post-retirement benefits decreased $35.8 million, driven by a decrease in the discount rate partially offset by net asset growth.
Balance Sheet
Fiscal Year 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year 2016 – Cash decreased $30.3 million in FY17 due to investment in capital projects. The related investment is shown in the $50.8 million increase in property and equipment, net. Long-term investments decreased $21.9 million compared to FY16 due, in part, to $55.9 million utilized to pay for the capital projects. Accounts payable decreased $15.8 million due, in part, to a reduction in subcontractor volume. Accrued post-retirement benefits decreased $19.2 million driven by an increase in the discount rate, growth of the plan assets, and settlement of the Retirement Plan for Employees (“RPE”) plan freeze. Capital leases (net of allowance) decreased by $8.7
A-24
million due to impairment of a contractual obligation with the former subcontractor who leased the St. Petersburg, FL manufacturing facility.
Fiscal Year 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year 2015 – Long-term investments increased $53.9 million in FY16 from reinvestment of a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the One Hampshire Street condominium units. The reduction to property and equipment, net, of $24.5 million also reflects the impact of the condominium sale. In FY16, capital leases (net of allowance) increased by $12.2 million due, in part, to the recognition of Draper’s contractual obligation with the former subcontractor leasing the Company’s Florida facility. Accounts payable increased $11.4 million driven by increased subcontractor volumes. Accrued post-retirement benefits increased $25.6 million due to a decrease in the discount rate and net growth in the plan assets.
Corpus: Investment in Securities
Draper’s Investment Portfolio (the “Corpus”) was established to effectively manage any surplus Draper experienced in operating income and proceeds of rental income into a consolidated investment portfolio whose purpose was primarily to provide financial flexibility to the Company.
In 2015, the purpose of the Corpus was expanded as Draper began to use part of the proceeds from returns for the initial funding of strategic investment programs. Draper does not have a formal spending policy but determines its discretionary withdrawals from the Corpus based on the strength of the annual returns. In 2015, management also undertook an investment advisor search with the intension of building a more sophisticated portfolio beyond the equities and fixed income allocation then provided by the Company’s manager. Draper hired Perella Weinberg Partners Agility (“PWP Agility”) in May 2015 as its outsourced chief investment officer. Over the next year Draper: (i) rewrote its Investment Policy Statement to encompass a fully diversified portfolio among several asset classes and (ii) used comingled vehicles provided by PWP Agility to establish positions in hedge funds, real assets and private capital with over 30 asset managers, significantly reducing the expected volatility of the portfolio.
Draper’s Board of Directors, the ultimate fiduciary of the Corpus, has delegated responsibility for the investment management process to the Company’s senior staff and the Finance Committee, who are charged with taking appropriate action if investment objectives are not met or if policy and guidelines are not followed. The Finance Committee generally meets three times per fiscal year.
A-25
Market Value of Investments Held in the Corpus as of June 30, 2017 ($ in thousands) Asset Class Market Value % of Total Portfolio Global Equities $ 129,351 52.7% Global Fixed Income 43,438 17.7% Hedge Funds (Absolute Returns) 43,788 17.8% Real Assets 24,614 10.0% Private Capital 2,419 1.0% Cash 1,867 0.8% Total Corpus $ 245,477 100.0% Other miscellaneous investments 3,231 Total Investments $ 248,708
Annual Performance of Corpus By Fiscal Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 14.36% 19.18% 4.39% -4.31% 13.71%
OTHER MATTERS
Liquidity
As detailed above, Draper’s Corpus, which has been generated by cumulative profits and investment return and is, therefore, not subject to any third-party restrictions reflected a significant source of liquidity for the Company. Of the $245 million balance at June 30, 2017, $121 million was convertible to cash within one week, $41 million was convertible to cash within one quarter, $51 million was convertible to cash within one year and $32 million was not convertible to cash within one year. In addition to the substantially liquid Corpus, Draper has short term lines of credit which are renewed annually. Draper has a line of credit for $15 million with Bank of New York Mellon, secured by the investments in the Corpus, and an unsecured line of credit for $25 million with Bank of America. Additionally, Draper has substantial value in its real estate holdings that could be monetized through additional condominium sales or other financial transactions.
Future Financing Plans
Substantially concurrent with the issuance of the Bonds, Draper expects to enter into a medium-term capital financing arrangement, in an amount not to exceed $15 million, with an affiliate of Bank of America. The facility, or facilities, will provide financing for certain fixed asset purchases of the Company for tenors of three-to-ten years, depending on the nature of each asset financed, and will be secured by liens in the underlying assets. Otherwise, Draper has no current plans to borrow additional funds for facilities or other capital expenditures after the issuance of the Bonds. Management believes that capital
A-26
requirements will be satisfied through annual cash flow and periodic use of investment balances to support facility improvements and other corporate purposes.
Litigation
Draper is a party to certain administrative actions, claims and litigation arising from the ordinary course of its business activities. In the opinion of management, if any such action were to be decided adversely to Draper’s interests, any liability that might result would not have a material adverse effect on Draper and would not affect the ability of Draper to meet its obligations with respect to the Bonds.
Very truly yours,
THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC.
By: Kaigham J. Gabriel President and CEO
By: Elizabeth Mora Chief Administrative Officer and Treasurer
A-27 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] APPENDIX B
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Financial Statements June 30, 2017 and July 1, 2016 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Index June 30, 2017 and July 1, 2016
Page(s)
Report of Independent Auditors...... 1
Financial Statements
Statements of Financial Position...... 2
Statement of Activities...... 3
Statements of Cash Flows...... 4
Notes to Financial Statements...... 5-32
Report of Independent Auditors
To the Board of Directors of The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc., which comprise the statements of financial position as of June 30, 2017 and July 1, 2016, and the related statements of activities and changes in net assets and of cash flows for the years then ended.
Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the Company's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. as of June 30, 2017 and July 1, 2016, and the results of their operations and there cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.