DOCSLIB.ORG

R-700 MIT's ROLE in PROJECT APOLLO VOLUME I PROJECT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
R-700 MIT's ROLE in PROJECT APOLLO VOLUME I PROJECT R-700 MIT’s ROLE IN PROJECT APOLLO FINAL REPORT ON CONTRACTS NAS 9-153 AND NAS 9-4065 VOLUME I PROJECT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ABSTRACTS AND BIBLIOGRAPHY edited by James A. Hand OCTOBER 1971 CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS, 02139 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was prepared under DSR Project 55-23890, sponsored by the Manned Spacecraft Center of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The description of project management was prepared by James A. Hand and is based, in large part, upon discussions with Dr. C. Stark Draper, Ralph R. Ragan, David G. Hoag and Lewis E. Larson. Robert C. Millard and William A. Stameris also contributed to this volume. The publication of this document does not constitute approval by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the findings or conclusions contained herein. It is published for the exchange and stimulation of ideas. @ Copyright by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Published by the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Printed in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U. S. A., 1972 ii The title of these volumes, “;LJI’I”s Role in Project Apollo”, provides but a mcdest hint of the enormous range of accomplishments by the staff of this Laboratory on behalf of the Apollo program. Rlanss rush into spaceflight during the 1060s demanded fertile imagination, bold pragmatism, and creative extensions of existing tecnnologies in a myriad of fields, The achievements in guidance and control for space navigation, however, are second to none for their critical importance in the success of this nation’s manned lunar-landing program, for while powerful space vehiclesand rockets provide the environment and thrust necessary for space flight, they are intrinsicaily incapable of controlling or guiding themselves on a mission as complicated and sophisticated as Apollo. The great achievement of this Laboratory was to supply the design for the primary hardware and software necessary to solve the Apollo guidance, navigation and control problem. It is to the credit of the entire team that this hardware and software have performed so dependably throughout the Apollo program. The quantum leap in technology nurtured by the Apollo program has been and should continue to be of immensely significant benefit to this country--socially, economically and in terms of its naticnal esteem. It is the responsibility of al! those who contributed to the proud achievements of Apollo to convince their countrymenof the directions thisnation ought to follow in implementing these newly gained -and hard fought for-advances. C. Stark Draper, President Charles Stark Draper Laborator! R- 700 MIT’S ROLE IN PROJECT APOLLO Final Report on Contracts NAS 9-153 and KM 9-4065 VOLUME I PROJECT MANAGEMEKT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ABSTRACTS AND BIBLIOGR.APIIY ABSTRACT Seventy-six days after the I’resident of the United States committed the nation to a manned lunar-landing program, the Charles Stark Draper (formerly Instrumentation) Laboratory of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology received the first major contract of the APOL,LO program. The Laboratory was to design and implement the requisite hardware and software for the Guidance, Navigation and Control system of the APO1,L.O spacecraft, Chapter I of this volume of the Final Report discusses the 1,aboratory’s management of the APOLLO project. Chapter II presents salient features in the development of the guidance, navigation and control system hardware. lippendix A contains abstracts of some research and engineering reports and theses prepared under Contracts r\;&\S 9-153 and NAS g-4065, and Appendix B is a bibliography of all such reports and theses prepared through June 1969. V CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements ....................................... ii Foreword ............................................. 111 Abstract ............................................. v List of Illustrations ...................................... xv f’reface..........................................~~~ . 1 CHXPTER I: PROJECT MANAGERilES ........................ 3 1.0 OVERVIEW ....................................... 3 2.0 LABORATORY OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ................. 5 2.1 Objectives .................................... 5 2.2 Policies ...................................... 5 3.0 LilBORATORY STAFF ................................ 7 3.1 Staffing Levels ................................. 7 3.2 Education at the Laboratory ........................ 7 4.0 FISCALBACKGROUND ............................... 11 4.1 General Fiscal Policy ............................ 11 4.2 Fiscal Background of the Apollo Project ................ 11 5.0 lIPOLL0 ORGANIZATION .............................. I. 3 5.1 Background ................................... 13 5.2 Apollo Program Organization ....................... 13 5.3 Evolutionary Changes in Project Efforts ................ 1. 7 5.3.1 Engineering Resource Allocation ................. 17 5.3.2 Hardware Development Tasks ................... 23 5.3.3 The Software Developmental Tasks ................ 25 vii CONTENTS (cont.) 5.4 Communications . , , . s s . s . , . L D r . *. 26 5.4.1 Technical Memoranda 0 . e . e 26 5.4.2 Administrative Letters and Memoranda . e . f . a . 28 5.5 Design Review Board . , e s . s . , . - . , . e 29 5.6 Change Control Board . a . , 0 . , . s , , . e . s . 30 5.7 The Role of the Industrial Residents . 0 . a , e * . 33 6.0 PROJECT AND MISSION DEVELOPMENT REORGANIZATION . , , . 37 6.1 Recognition of Need for Changes ..................... 37 6.2 Reorganization Approach .......................... 37 6.2.1 Group Definition and Tasks ..................... 38 6.2.2 Project Manager Approach Adopted ............... 38 6.3 Software Management and Organization ................. 39 7.0 CONCLUSIONS . ..=..........~......~ 41 CHAPTER II: GN&C DEVELAOPMENT (HARDWARE) . 43 1.0 APOLLO CONFIGURATION. c b s e . e e . s. 45 2.0 THE APOLL, MISSION . = . e . o . s . 0 . e . 47 3.0 FLIGHT EXPERIENCE SUMMARY . , . s s . 0.. *. s . e 51 3.1 Introduction r a . 0 . s . e . e . s D q . L e e a e e 51 3.2 Command Module System . e ( . e . s , , , . s . s . , m . s e e 51 3.3 Lunar Module System . e . e . s * . 53 3. ‘1 Inertial Measurement Unit * . e . e . s e . a e I s 55 3.4.1 Gyro or Accelerometer Failure Prediction , L . s . e . , . 55 3.4.2 Accelerometer Performance . - . e I a 57 3.4.3 Gyro Performance . , . e . e . e . , 57 3,5 Optical Subsystem . , . e . I . e 0 . 57 3.5.1 Star Visibility in Scanning Telescope . , . L1 . 60 3.5.2 Star Recognition In Sextant and IMU Alignment to Stars e 0 51 3.5.3 Particles and Deposits . a . s . L . c . 61 3.5.4 Lunar Module Alignment Optical Telescope . s . e e s 62 3.5.5 Other Features of the Optics . e . = . - . e 62 . I'll1 CONTENTS (cont.1 3.6 Computer Subsystem . ~ . ~ . s . s , . , . s . a ‘ 63 3.7 Control Systems - Digital Autopilots . m I . , . , . r . , 0 64 3.7.1 Rate Derivation for Control . s . I = . 65 3.7.2 Autopilot Gain Scheduling . a . , . , . = . 66 3.7.3 Lunar Module Descent Powered Flight Control . ( . r e 66 3.8 Rendezvous Navigation . s . e , . ‘ . 0 . * . , 67 3.8.1 Rendezvous Measurements and Calculations s . e . s . 67 3.8.2 Lunar Module Active Rendezvous in APOLLO 9 . a . 68 3.9 Midcourse Navigation . e . s . e . a 0 68 3.10 Conclusion . I~.I..~ ‘... ~..~..,...,...... 69 4.0 DESIGN OBJECTIVES AKD LIMITING FACTORS .............. 73 4.1 Background Information ........................... 73 4.1.1 Scope of the Original Project Objectives ............ 73 4.2 Technical Approach .............................. 74 4.2.1 Midcourse Guidance, Tu‘avigation and Control ......... 74 4.2.2 Lunar Landing ............................. 76 4.2.3 Lunar Launch, Transearth Injection, Atmospheric Entry Guidance .................... 77 4.3 Limiting Design Factors ........................... 77 4.3.1 GNBrC System .............................. 77 4.3.2 System Fabrication .......................... 79 4.3.2.1 Power Supply Protection . , , . ‘ . e , . B * r . e . 79 4.3.2.2 Signal Conditioning ..................... 79 4.3.3 Testing .................................. 79 4.3.3.1 Coupling Data Unit ..................... 79 4.3.3.2 Inertial Components .................... 79 4.3.3.3 Axis Offset .......................... 79 4.3.3.4 Diagnostics .......................... 80 4.3.3.5 Prototypes .......................... 80 3.3.4 Crew Displays and Controls .................... 80 4.3.4.1 interfaces ........................... 80 4.3.4.2 Repetitive Functions .................... 80 4.3.4.3 Inputs .............................. 80 4.3.4.4 Identifiers ........................... 80 ~4.3.4.5 DSKY Pushbuttons ..................... 81 4.3.4.6 Lights ............................. 81 4.3.4.7 Data Package .......................... 81 ix CONTENTS (cont.) 4.3.5 Crew Training ............................. a1 4.3.6 Reliability ................................ 81 4.3.7 Computer Subsystem ......................... 81 4.3.7.1 Memory ............................ 81 4.3.7.2 Logic .............................. 82 4.3.7.3 InpUt-OUt-WT ......................... 83 4.3.7.4 Software ............................ 83 4.3.7.5 Power Supply ......................... 83 4.3.7.6 Logic Electrical Design .................. 83 4.3.7.7 Memory Electrical Design ................ 84 4.3.7.8 DSKY Electrical Design .................. 84 4.3.8 Optics Subsystem ........................... 84 4.3.8.1 Automatic Sensors ..................... a4 4.3.8.1 Optics Control System Design .............. 84 4.3.8.3 Optical Design .......................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Doc Draper Became the Father of Inertial Guidance
    (Preprint) AAS 18-121 HOW DOC DRAPER BECAME THE FATHER OF INERTIAL GUIDANCE Philip D. Hattis* With Missouri roots, a Stanford Psychology degree, and a variety of MIT de- grees, Charles Stark “Doc” Draper formulated the basis for reliable and accurate gyro-based sensing technology that enabled the first and many subsequent iner- tial navigation systems. Working with colleagues and students, he created an Instrumentation Laboratory that developed bombsights that changed the balance of World War II in the Pacific. His engineering teams then went on to develop ever smaller and more accurate inertial navigation for aircraft, submarines, stra- tegic missiles, and spaceflight. The resulting inertial navigation systems enable national security, took humans to the Moon, and continue to find new applica- tions. This paper discusses the history of Draper’s path to becoming known as the “Father of Inertial Guidance.” FROM DRAPER’S MISSOURI ROOTS TO MIT ENGINEERING Charles Stark Draper was born in 1901 in Windsor Missouri. His father was a dentist and his mother (nee Stark) was a school teacher. The Stark family developed the Stark apple that was popular in the Midwest and raised the family to prominence1 including a cousin, Lloyd Stark, who became governor of Missouri in 1937. Draper was known to his family and friends as Stark (Figure 1), and later in life was known by colleagues as Doc. During his teenage years, Draper enjoyed tinkering with automobiles. He also worked as an electric linesman (Figure 2), and at age 15 began a liberal arts education at the University of Mis- souri in Rolla.
    [Show full text]
  • PEANUTS and SPACE FOUNDATION Apollo and Beyond
    Reproducible Master PEANUTS and SPACE FOUNDATION Apollo and Beyond GRADE 4 – 5 OBJECTIVES PAGE 1 Students will: ö Read Snoopy, First Beagle on the Moon! and Shoot for the Moon, Snoopy! ö Learn facts about the Apollo Moon missions. ö Use this information to complete a fill-in-the-blank fact worksheet. ö Create mission objectives for a brand new mission to the moon. SUGGESTED GRADE LEVELS 4 – 5 SUBJECT AREAS Space Science, History TIMELINE 30 – 45 minutes NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS ö 5-ESS1 ESS1.B Earth and the Solar System ö 3-5-ETS1 ETS1.B Developing Possible Solutions 21st CENTURY ESSENTIAL SKILLS Collaboration and Teamwork, Communication, Information Literacy, Flexibility, Leadership, Initiative, Organizing Concepts, Obtaining/Evaluating/Communicating Ideas BACKGROUND ö According to NASA.gov, NASA has proudly shared an association with Charles M. Schulz and his American icon Snoopy since Apollo missions began in the 1960s. Schulz created comic strips depicting Snoopy on the Moon, capturing public excitement about America’s achievements in space. In May 1969, Apollo 10 astronauts traveled to the Moon for a final trial run before the lunar landings took place on later missions. Because that mission required the lunar module to skim within 50,000 feet of the Moon’s surface and “snoop around” to determine the landing site for Apollo 11, the crew named the lunar module Snoopy. The command module was named Charlie Brown, after Snoopy’s loyal owner. These books are a united effort between Peanuts Worldwide, NASA and Simon & Schuster to generate interest in space among today’s younger children.
    [Show full text]
  • Go for Lunar Landing Conference Report
    CONFERENCE REPORT Sponsored by: REPORT OF THE GO FOR LUNAR LANDING: FROM TERMINAL DESCENT TO TOUCHDOWN CONFERENCE March 4-5, 2008 Fiesta Inn, Tempe, AZ Sponsors: Arizona State University Lunar and Planetary Institute University of Arizona Report Editors: William Gregory Wayne Ottinger Mark Robinson Harrison Schmitt Samuel J. Lawrence, Executive Editor Organizing Committee: William Gregory, Co-Chair, Honeywell International Wayne Ottinger, Co-Chair, NASA and Bell Aerosystems, retired Roberto Fufaro, University of Arizona Kip Hodges, Arizona State University Samuel J. Lawrence, Arizona State University Wendell Mendell, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Clive Neal, University of Notre Dame Charles Oman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Rice, Arizona State University Mark Robinson, Arizona State University Cindy Ryan, Arizona State University Harrison H. Schmitt, NASA, retired Rick Shangraw, Arizona State University Camelia Skiba, Arizona State University Nicolé A. Staab, Arizona State University i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................2 Notes...............................................................................................................................3 THE APOLLO EXPERIENCE............................................................................................4 Panelists...........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • By September 1976 the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Cambridge
    P-357 THE HISTORY OF APOLLO ON-BOARD GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL by David G. Hoag September 1976 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 @ The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. , 1976. the solar pressure force on adjustable sun vanes to drive the average speed of these wheels toward zero. Overall autonomous operation was managed on-board by a small general purpose digital computer configured by its designer, Dr. Raymond Alonso, for very low power drain except at the occasional times needing fast computation speed. A special feature of this computer was the pre-wired, read-only memory called a core rope, a configuration of particularly high storage density requiring only one magnetic core per word of memory. A four volume report of this work was published in July, 1959, and presented to the Air Force Sponsors. However, since the Air Force was disengaging from civilian space development, endeavors to interest NASA were undertaken. Dr. H. Guyford Stever, then an MIT professor, arranged a presentation with Dr. Hugh Dryden, NASA Deputy Administrator, which took place on September 15.* On November 10, NASA sent a letter of in- tent to contract the Instrumentation Laboratory for a $50,000 study to start immediately. The stated purpose was that this study would con- c tribute to the efforts of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in conducting unmanned space missions to Mars, Venus, and the Earth's moon scheduled in Vega and Centaur missions in the next few years. A relationship be- tween MIT and JPL did not evolve. JPL's approach to these deep space missions involved close ground base control with their large antenna tracking and telemetry systems, considerably different from the on- board self sufficiency method which the MIT group advocated and could best support.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon John M
    Chapter Two Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon John M. Logsdon Project Apollo, the remarkable U.S. space effort that sent 12 astronauts to the surface of Earth’s Moon between July 1969 and December 1972, has been extensively chronicled and analyzed.1 This essay will not attempt to add to this extensive body of literature. Its ambition is much more modest: to provide a coherent narrative within which to place the various documents included in this compendium. In this narrative, key decisions along the path to the Moon will be given particular attention. 1. Roger Launius, in his essay “Interpreting the Moon Landings: Project Apollo and the Historians,” History and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 3 (September 2006): 225–55, has provided a com­ prehensive and thoughtful overview of many of the books written about Apollo. The bibliography accompanying this essay includes almost every book-length study of Apollo and also lists a number of articles and essays interpreting the feat. Among the books Launius singles out for particular attention are: John M. Logsdon, The Decision to Go to the Moon: Project Apollo and the National Interest (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1970); Walter A. McDougall, . the Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age (New York: Basic Books, 1985); Vernon Van Dyke, Pride and Power: the Rationale of the Space Program (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1964); W. Henry Lambright, Powering Apollo: James E. Webb of NASA (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995); Roger E. Bilstein, Stages to Saturn: A Technological History of the Apollo/Saturn Launch Vehicles, NASA SP-4206 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1980); Edgar M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authority: Earth Inferno and Other Stories V. 3 Free
    FREE THE AUTHORITY: EARTH INFERNO AND OTHER STORIES V. 3 PDF Mark Millar,Frank Quitely,Chris Weston | 160 pages | 01 Aug 2002 | DC Comics | 9781563898549 | English | United States Earth Inferno for sale online | eBay This article is a list of story arcs for the Wildstorm comic book The Authority presented in chronological order of release. The Authority make their first public appearance to stop Kaizen Gamorraan old enemy of Stormwatchwho wants to take advantage of Stormwatch's breakup to take revenge upon the world. To do this he uses engineered supersoldiers to destroy first Moscow and then part of London. The Authority does not manage to stop the attack on London, then predicts the third and final attack in Los Angeles which is averted with heavy civilian casualties. Midnighter uses the Carrier to destroy the superhuman clone factory on Gamorra's island. The Authority have to stop an invasion by a parallel Earth, specifically a parallel Britain called Sliding Albion. As it turns out, Jenny Sparks has met them before when their The Authority: Earth Inferno and Other Stories v. 3 first appeared in Sliding Albion is a world where open contact between aliens the blues and humans during the 16th century led to interbreeding and an imperialist culture similar to the Victorian British Empire. After the Authority repel the initial wave of attacks, Jenny takes the Carrier to the Sliding Albion universe where they destroy London and Italy and what's left of the blues' regime along with it. In an all-frequencies message, she tells the people to take advantage of the second chance and "We are the Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Investment Corporation (“AINV” Or the “Company”) for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2020
    2020 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Fellow Shareholders, We are pleased to present you with the annual report for Apollo Investment Corporation (“AINV” or the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. As we write this year's letter, the world is facing both a significant health and economic crisis due to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”, “coronavirus”, or “pandemic”). We hope this letter finds you safe and in good health. In our annual shareholder letters, we typically review our results for the year and provide our outlook for the next fiscal year. In this year’s letter, we will also focus on how AINV was positioned entering this challenging period, and how we are navigating the current environment. First and foremost, on behalf of everyone at AINV, we want to express our appreciation to all those who are working tirelessly to keep us safe and maintain essential services. We offer our deepest sympathy to all those who have been affected by the coronavirus. Our priority continues to be the health and well-being of our stakeholders and the employees of the Company’s Investment Adviser, Apollo Investment Management, L.P., an affiliate of Apollo Global Management, Inc., (together with its affiliates, “Apollo Global”). Apollo has fully transitioned to a remote work environment while ensuring full business continuity. A Review of Fiscal Year 2020 Looking back at fiscal year 2020, we continued to make significant progress executing our de-risking investment strategy to prepare for potential headwinds, if not an economic downturn such as the one we are currently experiencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Chenangoforks2.Pdf
    • Rilles – Lunar Rilles are long, narrow, depressions formed by lava flows, resembling channels. • Rugged Terra – Rugged terra are mountainous regions of the moon. • Wrinkle Ridges – Wrinkle Ridges are created through compression of tectonic plates within the maria. • Graben – Graben are formed from the stress of two fault lines. • Scarps – A displacement of land beside a fault. • Fault – A fault is a fracture on the surface. Grabens Rilles Scarps Fault Rugged Terra Wrinkle Ridge •Scarp‐ A type of fault. It is the displacement of land alongside a fault. • Mare Ridge‐ The raised edges of a mare impact basin. •Trough‐ A depression that is characterized by its shallow ridges • Lineament‐ A linear expression used to characterize a fault lined valley •The wrinkle ridge structures that deform and interrupt the mare basalts are commonly asymmetrical, with the steeper side bounded by a complex scarp composed of multiple overlapping lobate scarp segments that may have rounded crests that make them resemble mare ridges. •Lobate scarps are thrust faults that occur primarily in the Moon's lunar highlands. •a graben is a depressed block of land bordered by parallel faults. •Graben is German for ditch. •A graben is the result of a block of land being downthrown producing a valley with a distinct scarp on each side. •Graben often occur side-by-side with horsts. Horst and graben structures are indicative of tensional forces and crustal stretching. •Horsts are parallel blocks that remain between graben, the bounding faults of a horst typically dip away from the center line of the horst. •Also known as a Dark halo craterlets •Dark-halo craters are formed when an impact unearths lower albedo material from below the surface, then deposits this darker ejecta around the main crater.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moon After Apollo
    ICARUS 25, 495-537 (1975) The Moon after Apollo PAROUK EL-BAZ National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.G- 20560 Received September 17, 1974 The Apollo missions have gradually increased our knowledge of the Moon's chemistry, age, and mode of formation of its surface features and materials. Apollo 11 and 12 landings proved that mare materials are volcanic rocks that were derived from deep-seated basaltic melts about 3.7 and 3.2 billion years ago, respec- tively. Later missions provided additional information on lunar mare basalts as well as the older, anorthositic, highland rocks. Data on the chemical make-up of returned samples were extended to larger areas of the Moon by orbiting geo- chemical experiments. These have also mapped inhomogeneities in lunar surface chemistry, including radioactive anomalies on both the near and far sides. Lunar samples and photographs indicate that the moon is a well-preserved museum of ancient impact scars. The crust of the Moon, which was formed about 4.6 billion years ago, was subjected to intensive metamorphism by large impacts. Although bombardment continues to the present day, the rate and size of impact- ing bodies were much greater in the first 0.7 billion years of the Moon's history. The last of the large, circular, multiringed basins occurred about 3.9 billion years ago. These basins, many of which show positive gravity anomalies (mascons), were flooded by volcanic basalts during a period of at least 600 million years. In addition to filling the circular basins, more so on the near side than on the far side, the basalts also covered lowlands and circum-basin troughs.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Apollo 15: “The Problem We Brought Back from the Moon”
    Appendix A Apollo 15: “The Problem We Brought Back From the Moon” Postal Covers Carried on Apollo 151 Among the best known collectables from the Apollo Era are the covers flown onboard the Apollo 15 mission in 1971, mainly because of what the mission’s Lunar Module Pilot, Jim Irwin, called “the problem we brought back from the Moon.” [1] The crew of Apollo 15 carried out one of the most complete scientific explorations of the Moon and accomplished several firsts, including the first lunar roving vehicle that was operated on the Moon to extend the range of exploration. Some 81 kilograms (180 pounds) of lunar surface samples were returned for anal- ysis, and a battery of very productive lunar surface and orbital experiments were conducted, including the first EVA in deep space. [2] Yet the Apollo 15 crew are best remembered for carrying envelopes to the Moon, and the mission is remem- bered for the “great postal caper.” [3] As noted in Chapter 7, Apollo 15 was not the first mission to carry covers. Dozens were carried on each flight from Apollo 11 onwards (see Table 1 for the complete list) and, as Apollo 15 Commander Dave Scott recalled in his book, the whole business had probably been building since Mercury, through Gemini and into Apollo. [4] People had a fascination with objects that had been carried into space, and that became more and more popular – and valuable – as the programs progressed. Right from the start of the Mercury program, each astronaut had been allowed to carry a certain number of personal items onboard, with NASA’s permission, in 1 A first version of this material was issued as Apollo 15 Cover Scandal in Orbit No.
    [Show full text]
  • First International Conference on Mars Polar Science and Exploration
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MARS POLAR SCIENCE AND EXPLORATION Held at The Episcopal Conference Center at Carnp Allen, Texas Sponsored by Geological Survey of Canada International Glaciological Society Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration Organizers Stephen Clifford, Lunar and Planetary Institute David Fisher, Geological Survey of Canada James Rice, NASA Ames Research Center LPI Contribution No. 953 Compiled in 1998 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under Contract No. NASW-4574 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. Abstracts in this volume may be cited as Author A. B. (1998) Title of abstract. In First International Conference on Mars Polar Science and Exploration, p. xx. LPI Contribution No. 953, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. This report is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1 113 Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost of shipping and handling. LPI Contribution No. 953 iii Preface This volume contains abstracts that have been accepted for presentation at the First International Conference on Mars Polar Science and Exploration, October 18-22? 1998. The Scientific Organizing Committee consisted of Terrestrial Members E. Blake (Icefield Instruments), G. Clow (U.S. Geologi- cal Survey, Denver), D. Dahl-Jensen (University of Copenhagen), K. Kuivinen (University of Nebraska), J.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrate Apollo
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Celebrate Apollo Exploring The Moon, Discovering Earth “…We go into space because whatever mankind must undertake, free men must fully share. … I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to Earth. No single space project in this period will be more exciting, or more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish …” President John F. Kennedy May 25, 1961 Celebrate Apollo Exploring The Moon, Discovering Earth Less than five months into his new administration, on May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy, announced the dramatic and ambitious goal of sending an American safely to the moon before the end of the decade. Coming just three weeks after Mercury astronaut Alan Shepard became the first American in space, Kennedy’s bold challenge that historic spring day set the nation on a journey unparalleled in human history. Just eight years later, on July 20, 1969, Apollo 11 commander Neil Armstrong stepped out of the lunar module, taking “one small step” in the Sea of Tranquility, thus achieving “one giant leap for mankind,” and demonstrating to the world that the collective will of the nation was strong enough to overcome any obstacle. It was an achievement that would be repeated five other times between 1969 and 1972. By the time the Apollo 17 mission ended, 12 astronauts had explored the surface of the moon, and the collective contributions of hundreds of thousands of engineers, scientists, astronauts and employees of NASA served to inspire our nation and the world.
    [Show full text]