DOCSLIB.ORG

Apollo Space Suit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APOLLO SPACE S UIT 1962–1974 Frederica, Delaware A HISTORIC MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LANDMARK SEPTEMBER 20, 2013 DelMarVa Subsection Histor y of the Apollo Space Suit This model would be used on Apollo 7 through Apollo 14 including the first lunar mission of Neil Armstrong and Buzz International Latex Corporation (ILC) was founded in Aldrin on Apollo 11. Further design improvements were made to Dover, Delaware in 1937 by Abram Nathanial Spanel. Mr. Spanel improve mobility for astronauts on Apollo 15 through 17 who was an inventor who became proficient at dipping latex material needed to sit in the lunar rovers and perform more advanced to form bathing caps and other commercial products. He became mobility exercises on the lunar surface. This suit was known as famous for ladies apparel made under the brand name of Playtex the model A7LB. A slightly modified ILC Apollo suit would also go that today is known worldwide. Throughout WWII, Spanel drove on to support the Skylab program and finally the American-Soyuz the development and manufacture of military rubberized products Test Program (ASTP) which concluded in 1975. During the entire to help our troops. In 1947, Spanel used the small group known time the Apollo suit was produced, manufacturing was performed as the Metals Division to develop military products including at both the ILC plant on Pear Street in Dover, Delaware, as well as several popular pressure helmets for the U.S. Air Force. the ILC facility in Frederica, Delaware. In 1975, the Dover facility Based upon the success of the pressure helmets, the Metals was closed and all operations were moved to the Frederica plant. Division, which became known as the Specialty Products Division The Apollo suits were used on eleven missions from 1968 until in 1955, began designing and manufacturing pressure suits when 1972 (see History Log) resulting in 158 combined hours on the they were awarded a contract to supply a prototype suit for the lunar surface. There was never a mission that had to be cut short X-15 program. This suit was identified as the model XMC-2-ILC or cancelled due to a problem with the Apollo space suits. They suit. That suit was not selected to support the X-15 program but it would go on to be the basis of iconic image of man on the moon did possess excellent mobility when pressurized. This mobility was in photos of Buzz Aldrin and the eleven others who traversed the possible because of the advanced latex-dipped joints. Seeing how lunar surface. good the mobility was, the Air Force continued to award small development contracts to ILC to further evolve this suit for other The displayed landmark Apollo suit at the ILC Dover company possible uses. At the same time, there was a general agreement museum is the Model A7L, serial number 036, delivered to NASA within ILC that a manned space program was on the horizon and in September, 1968. It was manufactured as a primary flight suit that the ILC suit stood a good chance of beating any competition. for Astronaut Edwin (Buzz) Aldrin as a member of the Apollo 8 As fortune would have it, NASA requested that bids for the Apollo backup crew. Aldrin then used it as his primary training suit for Lunar suits be submitted by December 1, 1961. This was for the the Apollo 11 mission where it played a critical role in helping engineering design, development and construction of the pressure him develop skills for lunar exploration. The same model suit suits to support the lunar missions. These would be the first was used on Apollo 11, the first successful lunar mission, during autonomous extra-vehicular activity (or EVA) space suits used on which both Aldrin and Neil Armstrong were the first humans to set an extra-terrestrial surface. Eight companies including ILC foot on the moon. This suit was later returned to ILC Dover by submitted proposals. In March, 1962, ILC was selected as the NASA so that it could be modified as a training suit to support winner of the competition with the model AX1L suit that was a Astronaut William Pogue for the Skylab Mission he flew in direct outgrowth of the XMC-2-ILC suit. November 1973. Since NASA was developing all of the Apollo systems including the capsule and the Lunar Module at the same time that the ILC Apollo suits were being developed, the suit design and performance requirements became a moving target. Following several variations of suit designs between 1962 and 1965, the nearly final version began to appear in the model A5L suit. By 1968, ILC produced the final lunar version, the model A7L suit. APOLLO SPACE SUIT INTERNATIONAL LATEX CORPORATION 1 Eng ineering place to go so that the wearer is not compressing the air and as a result, unnecessarily expending muscle energy. The solution came Significance with the convoluted, latex-dipped joints that maintained a near constant-volume enclosure around all of the flexible body joints. For the Apollo astronauts who ventured into space Thus, when the suit was pressurized at 3.8 lb/in² (26 kPa) the outside of their pressurized capsules and Lunar Modules, the suit provided excellent mobility. Steel cables along both sides of hazards were severe. They included a hard vacuum, exposure to the convolutes as well as other key locations about the suit cosmic and solar radiation, possible impacts by micrometeoroid restrained the growth when under pressure and provided added particles traveling at high velocities and a range of surface security when astronauts were adding mechanical loads such as temperatures between +/- 300 °F (+/-150 °C). At the same time, pulling and pushing on tools or bounding about on the lunar these protective systems had to provide an excellent fit while surface. permitting as much freedom of mobility as possible so all mission plans could be carried out safely and successfully. One of the more significant challenges was to keep the profile of the pressurized suit as compact as possible so that the three astronauts could comfortably operate side-by-side in the tight Command Module. That meant that the suits served a dual- purpose: both as an intravehicular activity (IVA) suit as well as an Suit Operation extravehicular activity (EVA) suit. Although the Command and The Apollo space suits provided all of the necessities and Lunar Modules were pressurized during all phases of flight, if a life support required for autonomous operations on the problem occurred during critical stages and pressure was lost, the lunar surface. Some of the main features included: suits would keep the astronauts alive and possibly allow a safe • Pure oxygen airflow at the continuous rate of 6 ft³/min landing on Earth. They were designed to be used as a constant- (170 LPM) wear pressure garment for up to 120 hours should all pressure be lost onboard the Command Module on its trip to the moon and • Suit pressurization at 3.8 lb/in² (26 kPa) (absolute pressure) back. This required feed ports in the helmet and a pass-through fitting for urine management. Other mission requirements • A continuous flow of cooling water provided to the liquid included interfacing the suit systems with the space vehicles. cooling garment The Apollo space suit consisted of three major components as • Radio communications back to Earth as well as signal outlined in the Apollo Space Suit U.S. patent number 3,751,727, telemetry containing heart rates and suit conditions filed in August 1968. They include: In addition to the time these suits spent on the lunar surface, they 1. The inner comfort liner were also used by several astronauts who stepped outside of the Command Module into deep space as they ventured between the 2. An intermediate pressure garment assembly providing a earth and the moon so that they could retrieve science packages controlled atmosphere within the garment without and film cartridges that were placed outside the vehicle. excessively inhibiting astronaut mobility Every part of the Apollo space suits served an important purpose. 3. The outer insulating and protective layer referred to as the The following sections highlight the most significant components. thermal micrometeoroid garment (TMG) that contained several layers of aluminized Mylar® and spacer fabrics to reflect radiation as well as reduce thermal conductivity. This was encapsulated by the outer-most Beta Cloth cover-layer that provided fire protection Arguably, one of the most important challenges was to provide an encapsulating, pressurizable garment that permitted as close to a full range of body-joint motion as in the nude condition. When an elbow or knee bends, the fabric cylinder containing the pressurized gas surrounding the joint has to allow that gas some 2 APOLLO SPACE SUIT INTERNATIONAL LATEX CORPORATION the pressure closure and maintained structural integrity and Torso-limb Suit assured that the pressure closure was never structurally loaded. Assembly A tether attachment bracket was provided on each side of the waist where tethers from the floor of the Lunar Module would be The overall sketch of the pressure restraint garment with attached to secure the astronauts when standing inside the Lunar the outer cover-layers removed for clarity of the details is shown Module during the decent and assent. No seats were provided in below. This was also referred to as the Torso-Limb Suit Assembly order to keep weight to a minimum. During the periods of zero- or TLSA. It is a one-piece garment with all components integrated. gravity on descent and ascent and because of the possibility of a The gloves and helmet were removable. The externally worn lunar rough landing, the tether would secure them in place at all times.
Recommended publications
  • NEA~Ya:=~~~T?C:NA:=~~:C:Q:.,I~~;

    NEA~Ya:=~~~T?C:NA:=~~:C:Q:.,I~~;

    3 f~ ~:~~NEA~yA:=~~~T?c:NA:=~~:c:Q:.,I~~; . }RS:~cN ------------------------RELEASE NO, I FOR RELEASE' January 4, 1971 [ \_ ('. '~ '· APOLLO 14 STATUS REPORT Apollo 14 astronaut crew activities include physical examination at MSC, guidance and navigation system briefing, contingency (one-man) EVA simulation on January 5; lunar descent flight simulations with flight controller participation on January 6; lunar orbit and descent orbit insertion simulations with the flight controllers on January 7; EVA simulation with the flight controllers on January 8; and press interviews on January 9 at MSC Hypergolic propellants-- those which ignite spontaneously when the fuel and oxydizer meet-- will be loaded in the Apollo 14 spacecraft and in the auxiliary propulsion system of the Saturn third stage from January 4 to 8. Then RP-1 fuel will be loaded aboard the Saturn V first stage on January 9. Also during the week, spacecraft pyrotechnics will be installed, Saturn first stage engines will be leak-checked. and flight stowage of the modularized equipment stowage assembly in the lunar module descent stage will be accomplished. Preparations of the Apollo 14 space vehicle continue to proceed satisfactorily for a scheduled launching January 31 from Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39. Fifteen potential Skylab astronauts are scheduled to visit Sacramento Peak Observatory, Sunspot. New Mexico for solar telescope training on January ' and 7. The second stage for the 13th Saturn V rocket departed the NASA Mississippi Test Facility December 30 aboard the barge Poseidon for the Kennedy Space Center. The stage is scheduled to arrive January 5 and go into temporary storage in the VAB The stage is planned for use in the Skylab program as part of the Saturn V rocket to place the orbital workshop into Earth orbit in late 1972.
  • Breaking the Pressure Barrier: a History of the Spacesuit Injection Patch

    Breaking the Pressure Barrier: a History of the Spacesuit Injection Patch

    Breaking the Pressure Barrier: A History of the Spacesuit Injection Patch Shane M. McFarland1 Wyle/NASA-Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX Aaron S. Weaver2 NASA-Glenn Research Center, Columbus, OH The spacesuit assembly has a fascinating and complicated history dating back to the early 1930s. Much has been written on this history from an assembly perspective and, to a lesser extent, a component perspective. However, little has been written or preserved specifically on smaller, lesser-known aspects of pressure suit design. One example of this is the injection patch—a small 2–in.-diameter disk on the leg of the Apollo suit that facilitated a medical injection when pressurized, and the only known implementation of such a feature on a flight suit. Whereas many people are aware this feature existed, very little is known of its origin, design, and use, and the fact that the Apollo flight suit was not the only instance in which such a feature was implemented. This paper serves to tell the story of this seeming “afterthought” of a feature, as well as the design considerations heeded during the initial development of subsequent suits. Nomenclature EMU = Extravehicular Mobility Unit ETFE = ethylene tetrafluoroethylene EVA = extravehicular activity FEP = fluorinated ethylene propylene ILC = International Latex Corporation IM = intramuscular (injection) IO = intraosseal (injection) IV = intravascular (injection) LCG = liquid cooling garment NASA = National Aeronautics and Space Administration PGS = pressure garment subsystem TMG = thermal micromediorite garment UTC = urine transfer connector I. Introduction he earliest efforts in pressure suit design were driven by the need to survive high altitudes during attempts to T break speed or height flight records.
  • America's First Moon Landing

    America's First Moon Landing

    America’s First Moon Landing (July 21, 1969) Apollo 11, which was launched into his oval mural commemorating America’s Moon landing space from the Kennedy Space Center, embellishes the Brumidi Corridors in the Senate wing of the Florida, began its epic voyage to the Moon on July 16, 1969. On board were Capitol. The mural’s three main elements are: the rocket that Commander Neil A. Armstrong, Lunar propelled the astronauts into orbit; astronauts Neil Armstrong Module Pilot Edwin E. ”Buzz“ Aldrin, Jr., and Buzz Aldrin planting the United States flag on the Moon, and Command Module Pilot Michael with the lunar module Eagle in the background and the space capsule Collins. After 24 hours in lunar orbit, the T command/service module, Columbia, Columbia circling the Moon; and a view of Earth as seen from the Moon. separated from the lunar module, Eagle. Although the Eagle landed on the Moon in the afternoon of July 20, Armstrong and Aldrin began their descent to the lunar surface in the Eagle while Armstrong and Aldrin did not erect the flag until the next morning, which Collins stayed behind to pilot the explains why the scene is dated July 21, 1969. Columbia. The lunar module touched Muralist Allyn Cox painted the work. The son of artists Kenyon down on the Moon at Tranquility Base on July 20, 1969, at 4:17 P.M. EDT.Arm­ and Louise King Cox, Allyn Cox was born in New York City. He was strong reported, “The Eagle has landed.” educated at the National Academy of Design and the Art Students League At 10:56 P.M., Armstrong stepped in New York, and the American Academy in Rome.
  • Student Worksheets, Assessments, and Answer Keys

    Student Worksheets, Assessments, and Answer Keys

    Apollo Mission Worksheet Team Names _________________________ Your team has been assigned Apollo Mission _______ Color _________________ 1. Go to google.com/moon and find your mission, click on it and then zoom in. 2. Find # 1, this will give you information to answer the questions below. 3. On your moon map, find the location of the mission landing site and locate this spot on your map. Choose a symbol and the correct color for your mission (each mission has a specific symbol and you can use this if you like or make up your own). In the legend area put your symbol and mission number. 4. Who were the astronauts on the mission? The astronauts on the mission were ______________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 5. When did the mission take place? The mission took place from _______________________________________________ 6. How many days did the mission last? The mission lasted ______________________________________________________ 7. Where did the mission land? The mission landed at____________________________________________________ 8. Why did the mission land here? They landed at this location because ________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ 9. What was the goal of the mission? The goal of the mission was_______________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________
  • Apollo Program 1 Apollo Program

    Apollo Program 1 Apollo Program

    Apollo program 1 Apollo program The Apollo program was the third human spaceflight program carried out by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the United States' civilian space agency. First conceived during the Presidency of Dwight D. Eisenhower as a three-man spacecraft to follow the one-man Project Mercury which put the first Americans in space, Apollo was later dedicated to President John F. Kennedy's national goal of "landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth" by the end of the 1960s, which he proposed in a May 25, 1961 address to Congress. Project Mercury was followed by the two-man Project Gemini (1962–66). The first manned flight of Apollo was in 1968 and it succeeded in landing the first humans on Earth's Moon from 1969 through 1972. Kennedy's goal was accomplished on the Apollo 11 mission when astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed their Lunar Module (LM) on the Moon on July 20, 1969 and walked on its surface while Michael Collins remained in lunar orbit in the command spacecraft, and all three landed safely on Earth on July 24. Five subsequent Apollo missions also landed astronauts on the Moon, the last in December 1972. In these six spaceflights, 12 men walked on the Moon. Apollo ran from 1961 to 1972, and was supported by the two-man Gemini program which ran concurrently with it from 1962 to 1966. Gemini missions developed some of the space travel techniques that were necessary for the success of the Apollo missions.
  • AIAA Fellows

    AIAA Fellows

    AIAA Fellows The first 23 Fellows of the Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences (I) were elected on 31 January 1934. They were: Joseph S. Ames, Karl Arnstein, Lyman J. Briggs, Charles H. Chatfield, Walter S. Diehl, Donald W. Douglas, Hugh L. Dryden, C.L. Egtvedt, Alexander Klemin, Isaac Laddon, George Lewis, Glenn L. Martin, Lessiter C. Milburn, Max Munk, John K. Northrop, Arthur Nutt, Sylvanus Albert Reed, Holden C. Richardson, Igor I. Sikorsky, Charles F. Taylor, Theodore von Kármán, Fred Weick, Albert Zahm. Dr. von Kármán also had the distinction of being the first Fellow of the American Rocket Society (A) when it instituted the grade of Fellow member in 1949. The following year the ARS elected as Fellows: C.M. Bolster, Louis Dunn, G. Edward Pendray, Maurice J. Zucrow, and Fritz Zwicky. Fellows are persons of distinction in aeronautics or astronautics who have made notable and valuable contributions to the arts, sciences, or technology thereof. A special Fellow Grade Committee reviews Associate Fellow nominees from the membership and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors, which makes the final selections. One Fellow for every 1000 voting members is elected each year. There have been 1980 distinguished persons elected since the inception of this Honor. AIAA Fellows include: A Arnold D. Aldrich 1990 A.L. Antonio 1959 (A) James A. Abrahamson 1997 E.C. “Pete” Aldridge, Jr. 1991 Winfield H. Arata, Jr. 1991 H. Norman Abramson 1970 Buzz Aldrin 1968 Johann Arbocz 2002 Frederick Abbink 2007 Kyle T. Alfriend 1988 Mark Ardema 2006 Ira H. Abbott 1947 (I) Douglas Allen 2010 Brian Argrow 2016 Malcolm J.
  • In Memory of Astronaut Michael Collins Photo Credit

    In Memory of Astronaut Michael Collins Photo Credit

    Gemini & Apollo Astronaut, BGEN, USAF, Ret, Test Pilot, and Author Dies at 90 The Astronaut Scholarship Foundation (ASF) is saddened to report the loss of space man Michael Collins BGEN, USAF, Ret., and NASA astronaut who has passed away on April 28, 2021 at the age of 90; he was predeceased by his wife of 56 years, Pat and his son Michael and is survived by their daughters Kate and Ann and many grandchildren. Collins is best known for being one of the crew of Apollo 11, the first manned mission to land humans on the moon. Michael Collins was born in Rome, Italy on October 31, 1930. In 1952 he graduated from West Point (same class as future fellow astronaut, Ed White) with a Bachelor of Science Degree. He joined the U.S. Air Force and was assigned to the 21st Fighter-Bomber Wing at George AFB in California. He subsequently moved to Europe when they relocated to Chaumont-Semoutiers AFB in France. Once during a test flight, he was forced to eject from an F-86 after a fire started behind the cockpit; he was safely rescued and returned to Chaumont. He was accepted into the USAF Experimental Flight Test Pilot School at Edwards Air Force Base in California. In 1960 he became a member of Class 60C which included future astronauts Frank Borman, Jim Irwin, and Tom Stafford. His inspiration to become an astronaut was the Mercury Atlas 6 flight of John Glenn and with this inspiration, he applied to NASA. In 1963 he was selected in the third group of NASA astronauts.
  • PEANUTS and SPACE FOUNDATION Apollo and Beyond

    PEANUTS and SPACE FOUNDATION Apollo and Beyond

    Reproducible Master PEANUTS and SPACE FOUNDATION Apollo and Beyond GRADE 4 – 5 OBJECTIVES PAGE 1 Students will: ö Read Snoopy, First Beagle on the Moon! and Shoot for the Moon, Snoopy! ö Learn facts about the Apollo Moon missions. ö Use this information to complete a fill-in-the-blank fact worksheet. ö Create mission objectives for a brand new mission to the moon. SUGGESTED GRADE LEVELS 4 – 5 SUBJECT AREAS Space Science, History TIMELINE 30 – 45 minutes NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS ö 5-ESS1 ESS1.B Earth and the Solar System ö 3-5-ETS1 ETS1.B Developing Possible Solutions 21st CENTURY ESSENTIAL SKILLS Collaboration and Teamwork, Communication, Information Literacy, Flexibility, Leadership, Initiative, Organizing Concepts, Obtaining/Evaluating/Communicating Ideas BACKGROUND ö According to NASA.gov, NASA has proudly shared an association with Charles M. Schulz and his American icon Snoopy since Apollo missions began in the 1960s. Schulz created comic strips depicting Snoopy on the Moon, capturing public excitement about America’s achievements in space. In May 1969, Apollo 10 astronauts traveled to the Moon for a final trial run before the lunar landings took place on later missions. Because that mission required the lunar module to skim within 50,000 feet of the Moon’s surface and “snoop around” to determine the landing site for Apollo 11, the crew named the lunar module Snoopy. The command module was named Charlie Brown, after Snoopy’s loyal owner. These books are a united effort between Peanuts Worldwide, NASA and Simon & Schuster to generate interest in space among today’s younger children.
  • Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress

    Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress

    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 6-2013 The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress Andrew Follett College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Follett, Andrew, "The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress" (2013). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 584. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/584 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Right Stuff: Why NASA Consistently Fails at Congress A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelors of Arts in Government from The College of William and Mary by Andrew Follett Accepted for . John Gilmour, Director . Sophia Hart . Rowan Lockwood Williamsburg, VA May 3, 2013 1 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 3 Part 1: Introduction and Background 4 Pre Soviet Collapse: Early American Failures in Space 13 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Successful Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo Programs 17 Pre Soviet Collapse: The Quasi-Successful Shuttle Program 22 Part 2: The Thin Years, Repeated Failure in NASA in the Post-Soviet Era 27 The Failure of the Space Exploration Initiative 28 The Failed Vision for Space Exploration 30 The Success of Unmanned Space Flight 32 Part 3: Why NASA Fails 37 Part 4: Putting this to the Test 87 Part 5: Changing the Method.
  • Dry Lubricant Coating Plays a Hand in Man Reaching for Mars

    Dry Lubricant Coating Plays a Hand in Man Reaching for Mars

    CASE STUDY Dry Lubricant Coating Plays A Hand In Man Reaching For Mars By Corey Wesnitzer, General Magnaplate Corp. Following the recent successful landings as the severe dust storms experienced on of the ‘Opportunity’ and ‘Spirit’ Rovers on MARS. In response to the growing likelihood Mars, NASA has become more open about its of manned planetary expeditions, ILC Dover investigations into a potential manned lunar of Dover, Delaware, has developed a new mission and a manned planetary expedition generation of spacesuit called the ‘I-Suit’. on Mars itself. In fact, NASA recently set up a new exploration office at its headquarters. Since project Apollo, ILC has been the designer and producer of the space suits Scientists and researchers involved in the for NASA (sub-contracted by Hamilton study, realizing that a hostile environment will Sundstrand), and the Company has leveraged confront long-distance space travelers, have its expertise in material fabrication to noted the requirement of highly specialized manufacture most of the blimps we see technologies and systems, e.g., durable type floating above sporting events, and even the suits for protection against events such inflatable ‘balloons’ that were responsible for the safe landing of both Mars Rovers. A total of 400 humans have been sent to explore space in ILC Dover suits since the mid-1960s and the next manned mission (slated for April 2005) is Expedition-9, a trip to the International Space Station. Space suits are largely modular in design and manufacturing them is a two-part process. ILC Dover is responsible for developing and manufacturing the arms, gloves, legs, torso, waist etc and the liquid cooling ventilation garment (LCVG) that removes most of the body heat from the suit.
  • Go for Lunar Landing Conference Report

    Go for Lunar Landing Conference Report

    CONFERENCE REPORT Sponsored by: REPORT OF THE GO FOR LUNAR LANDING: FROM TERMINAL DESCENT TO TOUCHDOWN CONFERENCE March 4-5, 2008 Fiesta Inn, Tempe, AZ Sponsors: Arizona State University Lunar and Planetary Institute University of Arizona Report Editors: William Gregory Wayne Ottinger Mark Robinson Harrison Schmitt Samuel J. Lawrence, Executive Editor Organizing Committee: William Gregory, Co-Chair, Honeywell International Wayne Ottinger, Co-Chair, NASA and Bell Aerosystems, retired Roberto Fufaro, University of Arizona Kip Hodges, Arizona State University Samuel J. Lawrence, Arizona State University Wendell Mendell, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Clive Neal, University of Notre Dame Charles Oman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Rice, Arizona State University Mark Robinson, Arizona State University Cindy Ryan, Arizona State University Harrison H. Schmitt, NASA, retired Rick Shangraw, Arizona State University Camelia Skiba, Arizona State University Nicolé A. Staab, Arizona State University i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................2 Notes...............................................................................................................................3 THE APOLLO EXPERIENCE............................................................................................4 Panelists...........................................................................................................................4
  • Analysis of Lunar Sample Mass Capability for the Lunar Exploration Architecture

    Analysis of Lunar Sample Mass Capability for the Lunar Exploration Architecture

    “Dedicated to Maximizing Planetary Sample Science While Protecting the Integrity of NASA Collected Extraterrestrial Materials” CAPTEM ANALYSIS DOCUMENT Analysis of Lunar Sample Mass Capability for the Lunar Exploration Architecture May 7, 2007 CAPTEM Document 2007-01 This report was prepared by the CAPTEM Lunar Subcommittee Charles Shearer, University of New Mexico, Chair CAPTEM Clive Neal, Notre Dame University, Chair, CAPTEM Lunar Subcommittee Lars Borg, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Brad Jolliff, Washington University Dimitri Papanastassiou, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Allan Treiman, Lunar and Planetary Institute Christine Floss, Washington University Malcolm Rutherford, Brown University Marc Norman, Australian National University James Farquhar, University of Maryland Recommended bibliographic citation: Shearer, C., Neal, C., Borg, L., Jolliff, B., Papanastassiou, D., Treiman, A., Floss, C., Rutherford, M., Norman, M., Farquhar, J. (2007) Analysis of Lunar Sample Mass Capability for the Lunar Exploration Architecture Unpublished white paper, 14 p, posted May 2007 by the Curation and Analysis Planning Team for Extraterrestrial Materials (CAPTEM) at http://www.lpi.usra.edu/captem/. Executive Summary The Curation and Analysis Planning Team for Extraterrestrial Materials (CAPTEM) was requested by the NASA Advisory Council (NAC) to conduct an analysis of the mass of returned lunar samples that must be accommodated within the Lunar Exploration Architecture to fulfill lunar science goals. This analysis was conducted in three manners that evaluated sample mass with regards to previous Apollo Program surface activity, scientific productivity, present-day scientific rationale as defined by the LAT, and samples (mass, diversity) required to fulfill the scientific objectives. The findings of this study are (1) lunar exploration architecture should accommodate 150 kg of traditional geological samples for return to Earth, not including sample containers and environmentally sensitive samples.