Kvinder I Danmarkshistorien
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Historiens demokratisering– Kvinder i Danmarkshistorien Anne Heide Mogensen Studienummer: 20 15 33 39 Aalborg Universitet Historiestudiet, 10. semester Specialevejleder: Poul Duedahl Afleveringsdato: 2. juni 2020 Antal anslag: 191.617 Anne Heide Mogensen Speciale – Historiens demokratisering 02/06/2020 Studienummer: 20 15 33 39 Aalborg Universitet Vejleder: Poul Duedahl Forord Jeg er vokset op i en familie med stærke og selvstændige kvinder, men jeg har aldrig fundet deres plads i den historieundervisning jeg har modtaget – et sted, hvor de passede ind og hvor deres historier blev fortalt. Gennem arbejdet med dette speciale har jeg fået håb for, at de i fremtiden ikke længere er glemte og gemte. Det kommer ikke til at ske fra den ene dag til den anden, men tiden er med kvinders historie og vi har målet for øje! Jeg vil gerne sige tak til min vejleder, Poul Duedahl, for god og kyndig vejledning gennem hele processen. Også en stor tak til historikerne Dorthe Chakravarty og Gry Jexen for at stille op til interview og give mig et indblik i deres arbejde med kvinders historie. // Anne Heide Mogensen Side 1 af 123 Anne Heide Mogensen Speciale – Historiens demokratisering 02/06/2020 Studienummer: 20 15 33 39 Aalborg Universitet Vejleder: Poul Duedahl Abstract In this thesis I set out to examine how Danish historians in the years between 2010-2020 convey Danish women´s history, which channels they use and what potential the combination of historians and social media have. I use Lasswells´ communication model as the method throughout and frame for the thesis since it´s a communication model that considers all parts of a communication situation. Lasswells´ communication model is as follows: Who says what in which channel to whom with what effect. A later addition was made with feedback. To find out what research there has been made about women´s history – not only in Denmark – I have looked towards American historians. More specifically I have implemented the theories of Nancy F. Cott, Elisabeth Fox-Genovese, Joan W. Scott and Joan Kelly-Gadol who all centers around women´s history. I have applied their theory upon the works of the Danish historians in the years between 2010-2020. The main thesis the American historians have in common is that they believe America is further ahead with conferences solely on women´s history for an example and that the history of European women is still incoherent and unstructured. Through my work with this thesis I have found this to be true in the case of the history of Danish women. Even though there are several good works on Danish women´s history done by brilliant historians, these stand isolated and doesn´t create a coherent and structured history that one could hope for. I have also applied theory about remembrance from The Collective Memory Reader. I have found that all of the Danish historians have in common that they include men, when they´re relevant and they all, except historian Birgitte Possing, more or less use social media to convey their work with Danish women´s history. However, their work also differs in a lot of ways. For an example Dorthe Chakravarty has a norm-critical approach, Possing uses anthropology to do a cultural history scan, Gry Jexen conveys through small portraits of women in history without including women´s private life and the Women´s museum focuses on sex and gender instead of women. I find that the potential of the combination of historians and social media can change the narrative in Danish women´s history. It has the potential to do so through a three-step rocket, where conveying history on social media can 1) activate history awareness, 2) create demands on history and 3) result in restructuring of the history teaching. Side 2 af 123 Anne Heide Mogensen Speciale – Historiens demokratisering 02/06/2020 Studienummer: 20 15 33 39 Aalborg Universitet Vejleder: Poul Duedahl Indholdsfortegnelse 1. Indledning ................................................................................................................................. 6 2. Problemfelt ................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Problemstillingens relevans ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Afgrænsning ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Forskellige former for historieformidling .................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Problemformulering ...................................................................................................................... 11 3. Begrebsafklaring og teori........................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Historiens demokratisering – kvinders historie ............................................................................ 11 3.1.1 Erindring.................................................................................................................................................. 12 3.2 Sociale medier og bred formidling................................................................................................. 14 4. Forskning................................................................................................................................. 15 4.1 Forskningsoversigt ......................................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Forskningsdiskussion ..................................................................................................................... 19 4.3 Sociale medier og historiens demokratisering ............................................................................... 21 5. Metode ..................................................................................................................................... 22 5.1 Lasswells kommunikationsmodel .................................................................................................. 22 6. Præsentation af kildemateriale/-typer .................................................................................... 24 6.1 Kildemateriale ................................................................................................................................ 24 6.1.1 Pia Fris Laneth ......................................................................................................................................... 24 6.1.2 Dorthe Chakravarty .................................................................................................................................. 25 6.1.3 Birgitte Possing ........................................................................................................................................ 26 6.1.4 Gry Jexen................................................................................................................................................. 26 6.1.5 Kvindemuseet i Aarhus ............................................................................................................................ 27 6.2 Kildetyper....................................................................................................................................... 27 6.2.1 Hjemmeside ............................................................................................................................................. 28 6.2.2 Facebook ................................................................................................................................................. 28 6.2.3 Instagram ................................................................................................................................................. 29 6.2.4 Twitter ..................................................................................................................................................... 29 6.2.5 YouTube .................................................................................................................................................. 29 6.2.6 Afrunding ................................................................................................................................................ 30 7. Første analysedel ..................................................................................................................... 30 7.1 Kontekst ......................................................................................................................................... 30 7.1.1 1980´erne ................................................................................................................................................. 32 7.1.2 1990´erne ................................................................................................................................................. 34 7.1.3 2000´erne ................................................................................................................................................. 35 7.1.4 Delkonklusion .......................................................................................................................................... 37 7.2 Pia Fris Laneth ............................................................................................................................... 37 Side 3 af 123 Anne Heide Mogensen Speciale