<<

Purdue Extension FS-56-W Commercial Production Series Preventing Refermentation Residual sugar and malic can cause of bottled

By Christian Butzke How much residual sugar assure that the wine is safe from noticeable refermentation, i.e. cell Enology Professor will cause visible yeast growth and carbonation by Saccharomyces Department of Food Science growth or carbonation in yeast strains. Nonetheless, any R.S., even Purdue University the bottle? down to 0.2 g/L, can still serve as a substrate for wine microbes such as [email protected] Residual sugar yeast or bacteria. The recognition threshold for sweetness from residual sugar (R.S.) in a dry wine Gas production of average acidity is about 5 g/L (0.5 and are converted into percent), while concentrations of 1 to roughly half and half 4 g/L can smoothen a wine without dioxide, i.e., 1,000 mg/L residual making it off-dry. In very acidic fructose can produce almost 500 mg/L wine styles these numbers are CO2 gas. The solubility of CO2 in wine is significantly higher, and a méthode very high compared to other gases such traditionelle may taste as nitrogen or . A carbonation brut even at 15 g/L R.S. that is strong enough to push corks Microbial stability would occur beyond the saturation concentration of about 1,400 mg/L at Sensory perception of dryness is quite room/bottling temperature (20˚C). different from microbial stability of a Whether the carbonation is sufficient particular wine, and it cannot be used as a gauge for refermentation potential. After fermentation, a wine is commercially considered dry when its combined Saccharomyces- fermentable sugars (glucose and fructose) are below 1 g/L (0.1%). If the winery laboratory tests for R.S. by measuring all reducing sugars, including , then 2 g/L (0.2%) is the common upper limit for a dry wine. Those numbers practically Gas bubbles on fermenting wine

The information in this publication is based on material from Winemaking Problems Solved, edited by Christian Butzke, Woodhead Publishing Ltd. to push out a is strongly influenced by bottle Gas production headspace volume and closure type. A perceivable is stoichiometrically converted into two- spritz may be tasted at 800 mg/L CO , which would 2 thirds lactic acid and one-third CO2, i.e., 300 mg/L require 1.6 g/L refermentable fructose or glucose. residual acid could produce 100 mg/L gas. The Haze formation solubility of CO2 in wine is relatively high, and cork- Saccharomyces may grow if the recommended doses pushing carbonation would occur only beyond the of sorbate and are not met, or the saturation concentration of about 1,400 mg/L at sterile filtration prior to bottling was compromised. room/bottling temperature (20˚C). A perceivable spritz It has been reported that even 100 mg/L residual may be tasted at 800 mg/L CO2, which would require pentoses can lead to a visible Brettanomyces yeast the of 2.4 g/L malic acid. haze if proper SO2 management and filter integrity Haze formation tests are not implemented. A visible haze due to the MLF bacteria will grow based on residual nutrients in growth of Saccharomyces must certainly be expected the wine if malic acid is present, and a visible haze in a above 1,000 mg/L R.S. due to the growth of can be expected above 300 mg/L (0.3 g/L). How much residual malic acid will cause visible malolactic bacteria References growth or carbonation in the bottle? www.vinquiry.com/pdf/05FallNwsltr.pdf — The Vinquiry Report, September 2005 Malic acid Wine Analysis and Production. Zoecklein, B., et al., at contain between 0.6 and 6 g/L of p. 91-92, Springer, New York, 1995. malic acid, depending on the growing climate. Malic acid and are the main in grapes Winemaking Basics. C. Ough., p. 85, Haworth Press, and wine, but wine bacteria cannot metabolize New York, 1992. tartaric acid during the malolactic fermentation (MLF). Wine Analysis and Production. Zoecklein, B., et al., Malolactic bacteria can turn malic acid into lactic acid p. 296, Springer, New York, 1995. and carbonic acid, which leaves the fermentor as , thereby reducing the acidity of the wine. Traditionally, the conversion of malic to lactic acid is Reviewed by: Richard Linton monitored in the winery lab via paper chromatography. Professor of Food Science and This method is semi-quantitative, and the absence of Director of the Center for Food Safety Engineering a malic acid spot on the chromatogram indicates a Department of Food Science, Purdue University concentration of less than 30 mg/L, a barely visible Bruce Bordelon one about 200 mg/L. It is commercially assumed that Professor if a wine completes MLF, the residual malic acid is less Department of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, Purdue University than 300 mg/L or 0.3 g/L.

Purdue Agriculture New 03/10

It is the policy of the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service that all persons have equal opportunity and access to its educational programs, services, activities, and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, disability or status as a veteran. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action institution. This material may be available in alternative formats. Order or download materials from Purdue Extension • The Education Store www.extension.purdue.edu/store