Winemaking 101 Glossary of Terms a Acetic Acid One of the Primary Volatile Acids in Wine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Concepts in Wine Chemistry
THIRD EDITION Concepts IN Wine Chemistry YAIR MARGALIT, Ph.D. The Wine Appreciation Guild San Francisco Contents Introduction ix I. Must and Wine Composition 1 A. General Background 3 B. Sugars 5 C. Acids 11 D. Alcohols 22 E. Aldehydes and Ketones 30 F. Esters 32 G. Nitrogen Compounds 34 H. Phenols 43 I. Inorganic Constituents 52 References 55 n. Fermentation 61 A. General View 63 B. Chemistry of Fermentation 64 C. Factors Affecting Fermentation 68 D. Stuck Fermentation 77 E. Heat of Fermentation 84 F. Malolactic Fermentation 89 G. Carbonic Maceration 98 References 99 v III. Phenolic Compounds 105 A. Wine Phenolic Background 107 B. Tannins 120 C. Red Wine Color 123 D. Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Grapes 139 References 143 IV. Aroma and Flavor 149 A. Taste 151 B. Floral Aroma 179 C. Vegetative Aroma 189 D. Fruity Aroma 194 E. Bitterness and Astringency 195 F. Specific Flavors 201 References 214 V. Oxidation and Wine Aging 223 A. General Aspects of Wine Oxidation 225 B. Phenolic Oxidation 227 C. Browning of White Wines 232 D. Wine Aging 238 References 253 VI. Oak Products 257 A. Cooperage 259 B. Barrel Aging 274 C. Cork 291 References 305 vi VH. Sulfur Dioxide 313 A. Sulfur-Dioxide as Food Products Preservative 315 B. Sulfur-Dioxide Uses in Wine 326 References 337 Vm. Cellar Processes 341 A. Fining 343 B. Stabilization 352 C. Acidity Adjustment 364 D. Wine Preservatives 372 References 382 IX. Wine Faults 387 A. Chemical Faults 389 B. Microbiological Faults 395 C. Summary ofFaults 402 References 409 X. -
Engineering Wine
Engineering Wine Submitted to Dr. Miguel Bagajewicz May 6, 2006 Susan L. Kerr Michael T. Frow Executive Summary A new methodology for the development of new products is applied to winemaking. A consumer preference function is developed that allows data generated by market analysis to be related to wine properties. These wine properties are easily measured throughout the winemaking process and can be manipulated by the producer at negligible cost. The manipulation of these variables affects the consumer’s satisfaction obtained from the enjoyment of wine. The most influential factor is identified to be that of toasting. Through incorporation of this consumer function, a demand model is formed that allows for the manipulation in selling price. Based on the consumer and the pricing models, a profit maximization model is formed. This function shows the characteristics of wine to target the selling price and capacity of the manufacturing plant simultaneously. Wine is evaluated by the consumer with the following characteristics: • Clarity • Color • Bouquet • Acidity • Sweetness • Bitterness • Body/Texture • Finish/Aftertaste Each of these characteristics is evaluated individually by the consumer’s level of satisfaction attained. Once the utility of the consumer is identified, these characteristics are evaluated by their relation to physical attributes that can be manipulated throughout the process at a minimal cost. Multiplied by weights pre-determined by the consumer’s ranking of priority, the summation of the products of each attribute and their corresponding weights form the consumer’s overall utility function. The value of satisfaction of the consumer is then compared to that of the competition, forming the superiority function that governs the pricing model. -
Domaine Luneau-Papin Muscadet from Domaine Luneau-Papin
Domaine Luneau-Papin Muscadet from Domaine Luneau-Papin. Pierre-Marie Luneau and Marie Chartier. Photo by Christophe Bornet. Pierre and Monique Luneau. Photo by Christophe Bornet. Profile Pierre-Marie Luneau heads this 50-hectare estate in Le Landreau, a village in the heart of Muscadet country, where small hamlets dot a landscape of vineyards on low hills. Their estate, also known as Domaine Pierre de la Grange, has been in existence since the early 18th century when it was already planted with Melon de Bourgogne, the Muscadet appellation's single varietal. After taking over from his father Pierre in 2011, Pierre-Marie became the ninth generation to make wine in the area. Muscadet is an area where, unfortunately, a lot of undistinguished bulk wine is produced. Because of the size of their estate, and of the privileged terroir of the villages of Le Landreau, Vallet and La Chapelle Heulin, the Luneau family has opted for producing smaller cuvées from their several plots, which are always vinified separately so as to reflect their terroir's particular character. The soil is mainly micaschist and gneiss, but some plots are a mix of silica, volcanic rocks and schist. The estate has a high proportion of old vines, 40 years old on average, up to 65 years of age. The harvest is done by hand -also a rarity in the region- to avoid any oxidation before pressing. There is an immediate light débourbage (separation of juice from gross lees), then a 4-week fermentation at 68 degrees, followed by 6 months of aging in stainless-steel vats on fine lees. -
Malolactic Fermentation in Red Wine
Fact Sheet WINEMAKING Malolactic fermentation in red wine Introduction Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is a secondary bacterial fermentation carried out in most red wines. Oenococcus oeni, a member of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) family, is the main bacterium responsible for conducting MLF, due to its ability to survive the harsh conditions of wine (high alcohol, low pH and low nutrients) and its production of desirable wine sensory attributes. One of the important roles of MLF is to confer microbiological stability towards further metabolism of L-malic acid. Specifically, MLF removes the L-malic acid in wine that can be a carbon source for yeast and bacterial growth, potentially leading to spoilage, spritz and unwanted flavours. MLF can also be conducted in some wines to influence wine style. MLF often occurs naturally after the completion of primary fermentation or can also be induced by inoculation with a selected bacterial strain. Since natural or ‘wild’ MLF can be unpredictable in both time of onset and impact on wine quality, malolactic starter cultures are commonly used. In Australia, almost all red wines undergo MLF and 74% are inoculated with bacterial starter cultures (Nordestgaard 2019). This fact sheet provides practical information for induction of MLF in red wine. A separate fact sheet provides equivalent information for white and sparkling base wine. These should also be read in conjunction with another fact sheet, Achieving successful malolactic fermentation, which gives further practical guidelines for MLF induction, monitoring and management. Updated September 2020 Fact Sheet WINEMAKING Key parameters for a successful MLF in red wine Composition of red wine/must The main wine compositional factors that determine the success of MLF are alcohol, pH, temperature and sulfur dioxide (SO2) concentration. -
Redalyc.Alternative Processing of Port-Wine Using Pectolytic Enzymes
Ciencia y Tecnología Alimentaria ISSN: 1135-8122 [email protected] Sociedad Mexicana de Nutrición y Tecnología de Alimentos México Rogerson, F.S.S; Vale, E.; Grande, H.J.; Silva, M.C.M. Alternative processing of port-wine using pectolytic enzymes Ciencia y Tecnología Alimentaria, vol. 2, núm. 5, julio, 2000, pp. 222-227 Sociedad Mexicana de Nutrición y Tecnología de Alimentos Reynosa, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=72420501 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 222-227, 2000 Copyright 2000 Asociación de Licenciados en Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos de Galicia (ALTAGA). ISSN 1135-8122 ALTERNATIVE PROCESSING OF PORT-WINE USING PECTOLYTIC ENZYMES PROCESADO ALTERNATIVO DEL VINO DE OPORTO USANDO ENZIMAS PECTOLÍTICOS PROCESADO ALTERNATIVO DO VIÑO DE OPORTO USANDO ENZIMAS PECTOLÍTICOS Rogerson, F.S.S*1; Vale, E.3; Grande, H.J.2; Silva, M.C.M.3 1* Departmento de Química, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto. Portugal. E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Licentec, Bernadottelaan 15, P.O.Box 8323, 3503 RH Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3 Escola Superior de Biotecnologia/Universidade Católica. Rua Dr.Antonio Bernardino de Almeida, 4200 Porto. Portugal. Recibido: 24 de Octubre de 1999; recibida versión revisada: 9 de Marzo de 2000; aceptado: 15 de Marzo de 2000 Received: 24 October 1999; rreceived in revised form: 9 March 2000; accepted: 15 March 2000 Abstract The objective of the present study was to investigate the application of a commercial pectolytic enzyme preparation “Ultrazym” during grape maceration for the alternative processing of 7 single varietal Port-Wines (Tinta Barroca, Mourisco Tinto, Tinta Roriz, Rufete, Tinta da Barca, Tinta Santarém and Touriga Nacional). -
Chardonnay Lees Management with Extralyse (ARC) Blenheim Vineyards Submitted by Kirsty Harmon Summary This Study Examined the Im
Chardonnay Lees Management with Extralyse (ARC) Blenheim Vineyards Submitted by Kirsty Harmon Summary This study examined the impact of lees stirring and batonnage enzyme addition during Chardonnay aging on the chemical and sensory qualities of the wine. It is a companion study to Blenheim’s Chardonnay Lees Management (2016), which compared the effects of not stirring Chardonnay to stirring Chardonnay. Chardonnay juice was fermented in barrels, and afterwards two different treatments were imposed: stirred, and stirred with Extralyse (Laffort). Stirring occurred once per week for 8 weeks. No major chemical differences could be observed between the finished wines. Wine tended to become more cold stable over time. Additionally, increased bentonite additions to become heat stable were necessary after aging. In general, people often could not distinguish between stirring and stirring with Extralyse. When people could distinguish, there appeared to be a slight preference for wine made with Extralyse. The descriptors used generally did not help elucidate which qualities in wine were affected by stirring. There may be a small tendency for Extralyse to enhance Fruit Intensity and Depth of Flavor, but these tendencies were weak. However, the stirring regime for this study was relatively short (8 weeks). In the future, more realistic stirring regimes should be implemented to see whether differences tend to increase over time. Introduction Marchal et al. (2011) provide an excellent brief review of yeast autolysis in their introduction. Lees are mainly composed of yeast, bacteria, tartaric acid, polysaccharides, and protein-tannin complexes (Zoecklein 2013). Heavy lees generally refers to lees which precipitate 24 hours after fermentation (generally grape particles and large complexes of other lees particulates), and can often lead to off- aromas in wine. -
Yeast Strains Recommended for Chardonnay Dynamics Fermentation Products Fermentation For
Yeast & Chardonnay Recommended Fermentation as primary Yeast Strains Recommended for Chardonnay Dynamics Fermentation Products fermentation for: ) 2 -tolerant 2 Manufacturer Vendor(s) Brand Strain Vigorous Ethanol-tolerant (>16%) Cold-tolerant (<10C) SO (up to 50 mg/lfSO Esters Glycerol Polysaccharides Mannoproteins Release Terpenes gucosidase(beta- activity) Degrade Malic Acid Barrel Ferment (sur lees) Style Malolactic style Fruit-forward style Restarting fermentation AB Mauri GW Kent, Maurivin AWRI 796 •• ••• Pacific Coast Chemicals AWRI R2 ••• • Cru-Blanc •• • • Elegance ••• Primeur •••• AEB Group American Tartaric Products Fermol® Associees ••• •• Blanc •• Chardonnay •••• Anchor Scott Laboratories Anchor VIN 13 •• •• Chr. Hansen Gusmer Enterprises Viniflora Symphony.nsac • DSM Gusmer Enterprises Collection Chardonnay •••• Cépage Fermicru LVCB •• •• Enartis Winetech LLC Challenge Vintage White •• • •• Aroma White • Laffort Scott Laboratories Actiflore C (F33) •• • • •• RMS2 •••• Zymaflore ST VL2 ••• Lallemand Vinquiry Enoferm ICV-D47 •••••• M05 • M1 •• M2 •• QA23 ••• Simi White • T306 • VQ11 ••• W46 •• Scott Laboratories, Vinquiry Lalvin EC1118 ••• •• ICV-K1 (V1116) ••• • •• BA11 •• CY3079 ICV-D254 •••••• S6U •••• ••• Lesaffre American Tartaric Products Bio-Springer BC S-103 (PdM)** • • • • • UCLM S-325 •• Red Star Côte de Blancs • (Epernay-2)** Red Star Champagne •• • • (UCD-595)*** Oenofrance Oenofrance Levuline C19 •• • • Vi-A-Dry Scott Laboratories Vi-A-Dry Montrachet (UCD-522)**** * Chart only includes yeast strains discussed in -
Conducting a Successful Malolactic Fermentation
CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL MALOLACTIC FERMENTATION PARAMETERPA RECOMMENDATION ACTION Grapes pH Between 3.20 and 3.50 Acid addition after cold soak FruitFru condition Visible rot, off odors Sorting Crush/Destem SO2SO < 40 mg/L total for white Minimize SO2 by using sound grapes Maceration < 70 mg/L total for red PotentialPPot alcohol < 13.5 % Harvest parameters Alcoholic YeastYeY a strain Use yeast strain that is compatible with ML bacteria Check with yeast supplier Fermentation InoculationIno strategy Inoculate with starter culture Direct, Step 1, or Build up: follow manufacturer Timing Post-alcoholic fermentation recommendation Strain Consider strains recommended for certain Strains available with low pH tolerance, high SO2 tolerance difficult wine conditions and high alcohol tolerance Malolactic TemperatureTem 64-71°F (18-22°C) Inoculate while wine still warm from primary ferment Fermentation Temp-controlled cellar/tanks SO2SO < 5 mg/L free NO SO2 additions until MLF complete AlcoholAlc < 13.5% Consider higher alcohol tolerant ML strain Use acclimatization steps for culture prior to inoculation pH 3.20 to 3.50 Acid adjustment if necessary (not recommended during MLF) Be alert to microbial spoilage issues if you have a high pH NNutrientsu Consider ML nutrients if vineyard lots have been Follow manufacturer recommendation problematic in the past or you used high nutrient demand yeast strain Conduct MLF on yeast lees Keep wine on light lees during MLF MMLFL progress Regular monitoring Paper chromatography, enzymatic analysis, external lab analysis Microscopic examination for Lactobacillus, If presence of spoilage bacteria consider lysozyme and Pediococcus re-inoculation after 2-3 weeks Monitor VA as indicator of spoilage bacteria PCR analysis Post Fermentation MLFML completion Malic acid < 30-50 mg/L Confirm with enzymatic assay or external lab analysis before & Aging making SO2 addition. -
Effect of Temperature and Duration of Maceration on Colour and Sensory Properties of Red Wine: a Review
Effect of Temperature and Duration of Maceration on Colour and Sensory Properties of Red Wine: A Review Hasan Şener Biotechnology Branch, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ege University, Turkey Submitted for publication: December 2017 Accepted for publication: March 2018 Key words: Cold maceration, skin contact, total phenols, aroma, colour, wine The maceration process plays an important role in the composition of the colour and sensory properties of red wine by facilitating the extraction of phenolic and aromatic compounds found in grapes. This review summarises the key findings from a study of the literature associated with research on the effects of the temperature and duration of maceration on the phenolic content, colour and sensory properties of red wine. In the past, many researchers have reported that higher maceration temperatures increase the extraction of phenolic compounds and enhance red wine colour, but low-temperature pre-fermentative techniques have become more popular in recent years due to their positive effects on wine composition, including lower oxidation of anthocyanin pigments and aroma compounds, inhibition of undesirable enzymatic activities, and an environment that is less conductive to microbial growth. Macerations carried out at low temperature ranges (10°C to 15°C) result in red wines with the highest levels of total phenolic content, anthocyanin and colour intensity, and richer fruity, flowery and spicy aroma. The duration of maceration has also been shown to have significant effects on red wine phenolic compounds, colour properties and the relevant sensory attributes. Studies show that prolonged maceration leads to a stable red colour, as well as richer tannin content, polymeric pigments and astringency. -
First Steps in Winemaking
FIRST STEPS IN WINEMAKING A complete month-by-month guide to winemaking (including the production of cider, perry and mead) and beer brewing at home, with over 130 tried and tested recipes 3rd EDITION 6th IMPRESSION By C. J. J. BERRY (Editor, The Amateur Winemaker) "The Amateur Winemaker," North Croye, The Avenue, Andover, Hants About this book THIS little book really started as a collection of recipes, reliable recipes which had appeared in the monthly magazine, "The Amateur Winemaker." First published in January 1960, it was an instant and phenomenal success, for a quarter of a million copies have been sold, and it is now recognised as the best "rapid course" in winemaking available to the beginner. This new edition has the advantage of modern format, and better illustrations, and the opportunity has been taken to introduce new material and bring the book right up to date. Those who are in need of recipes, and who have probably just fallen under the spell of this fascinating hobby of ours, will also want to know more of its technicalities, so this book includes a wealth of practical tips and certain factual information that any winemaker would find useful. In particular, the hydrometer, ignored in many books on winemaking, has been dealt with simply but adequately, and there is a really practical section on "home-brew" beers and ales . you will find this small book a mine of useful knowledge. The original recipes are there, over 130 of them, with quite a few others, and they are all arranged in the months of their making, so that you can pursue your winemaking all the year round with this veritable Winemakers' Almanac. -
Wine Listopens PDF File
Reservations Accepted | 10/1/2021 1 Welcome to Virginia’s First Urban Winery! What’s an Urban Winery, you ask? Well, we are. Take a look around, and you’ll see a pretty unique blend of concepts. First and foremost, you’ll see wine made here under our Mermaid label, highlighting the potential of Virginia’s grapes and wine production. Virginia has a rich history of grape growing and winemaking, and we’ve selected the best grapes we can get our hands on for our Mermaid Wines. We primarily work with fruit from our Charlottesville vineyard, with occasional sourcing from other locations if we see the opportunity to make something special. We’ve put together some really enjoyable wines for you to try – some classic, some fun, all delicious. Secondly, you’ll see wines from all around the world. Some you’ll recognize, others you might not. These selections lend to our wine bar-style atmosphere and really enrich the experience by offering a wide range of wines to be tried. They’re all available by the bottle, and most by the glass and flight as well, right alongside our Mermaid Wines. The staff can tell you all about any of them, so rest assured that you’ll never be drinking blind. These wines also rotate with the season, and there’s always something new to try. We have a full kitchen too, with a diverse menu that can carry you through lunch, brunch and dinner from the lightest snack to a full-on meal. With dishes that can be easily paired with a variety of our wines, make sure you try anything that catches your eye. -
Evaluation of the Oenological Suitability of Grapes Grown Using Biodynamic Agriculture: the Case of a Bad Vintage R
Journal of Applied Microbiology ISSN 1364-5072 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Evaluation of the oenological suitability of grapes grown using biodynamic agriculture: the case of a bad vintage R. Guzzon1, S. Gugole1, R. Zanzotti1, M. Malacarne1, R. Larcher1, C. von Wallbrunn2 and E. Mescalchin1 1 Edmund Mach Foundation, San Michele all’Adige, Italy 2 Institute for Microbiology and Biochemistry, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany Keywords Abstract biodynamic agriculture, FT-IR, grapevine, wine microbiota, yeast. Aims: We compare the evolution of the microbiota of grapes grown following conventional or biodynamic protocols during the final stage of ripening and Correspondence wine fermentation in a year characterized by adverse climatic conditions. Raffaele Guzzon, Edmund Mach Foundation, Methods and Results: The observations were made in a vineyard subdivided Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all’Adige, Italy. into two parts, cultivated using a biodynamic and traditional approach in a E-mail: [email protected] year which saw a combination of adverse events in terms of weather, creating 2015/1999: received 11 June 2015, revised the conditions for extensive proliferation of vine pests. The biodynamic 12 November 2015 and accepted approach was severely tested, as agrochemicals were not used and vine pests were 14 November 2015 counteracted with moderate use of copper, sulphur and plant extracts and with intensive use of agronomical practices aimed at improving the health of the doi:10.1111/jam.13004 vines. Agronomic, microbiological and chemical testing showed that the response of the vineyard cultivated using a biodynamic approach was comparable or better to that of vines cultivated using the conventional method.