DOCSLIB.ORG

Dottorato in Scienze Storiche, Archeologiche E Storico-Artistiche

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dottorato in Scienze Storiche, Archeologiche E Storico-Artistiche DOTTORATO IN SCIENZE STORICHE, ARCHEOLOGICHE E STORICO-ARTISTICHE Coordinatore prof. Francesco Caglioti XXX ciclo Dottorando: Luigi Oscurato Tutor: prof. Alessandro Naso Tesi di dottorato: Il repertorio formale del bucchero etrusco nella Campania settentrionale (VII – V secolo a.C.) 2018 Il repertorio formale del bucchero etrusco nella Campania settentrionale (VII – V secolo a.C.) Sommario Introduzione ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Storia degli studi sul bucchero rinvenuto in Campania ...................................................................... 8 1. I siti e i contesti ............................................................................................................................ 16 1.1 Capua .................................................................................................................................... 18 1.2 Calatia ................................................................................................................................... 28 1.3 Cales ...................................................................................................................................... 31 1.4 Cuma ..................................................................................................................................... 38 1.5 Il kolpos kymaios ................................................................................................................... 49 2. Catalogo dei materiali ................................................................................................................. 53 2.1 Capua .................................................................................................................................... 55 2.2 Calatia ................................................................................................................................. 155 2.3 Cales .................................................................................................................................... 164 2.4 Cuma ................................................................................................................................... 182 2.5 Pithekoussai ........................................................................................................................ 202 2.6 Parthenope - Neapolis ......................................................................................................... 204 3. Il repertorio formale ................................................................................................................. 205 3.1 Anfora .................................................................................................................................. 207 3.2 Oinochoe ............................................................................................................................. 211 3.3 Attingitoio ............................................................................................................................ 216 3.4 Olla ...................................................................................................................................... 218 3.5 Stamnos ............................................................................................................................... 220 3.6 Situla ................................................................................................................................... 221 3.7 Cratere ................................................................................................................................ 223 3.8 Pisside ................................................................................................................................. 225 3.9 Coperchio ............................................................................................................................ 226 3.10 Aryballos ............................................................................................................................. 227 3.11 Askos ................................................................................................................................... 228 3.12 Kotyle .................................................................................................................................. 229 3.13 Calice .................................................................................................................................. 232 3.14 Kantharos ............................................................................................................................ 234 3.15 Coppa .................................................................................................................................. 236 3.16 Ciotola ................................................................................................................................. 237 3.17 Coppetta su alto piede ......................................................................................................... 239 3.18 Fuseruola ............................................................................................................................ 240 4. Osservazioni conclusive ............................................................................................................ 249 Riferimenti bibliografici ................................................................................................................... 255 Indice delle figure Figura 1 Tavola conclusiva di Patroni 1902 ............................................................................................. 9 Figura 2 La Campania con indicazione dei siti esaminati (rielaborazione da Cerchiai 2017) ............... 17 Figura 3 Necropoli di Capua antica (da Melandri 2010a). .................................................................... 20 Figura 4 Capua. Aree con tracce dell'abitato arcaico ........................................................................... 25 Figura 5 Calatia. Estensione dell'abitato e aree delle necropoli (da Cerchiai 2010b ) ........................... 28 Figura 6 Cales. Area dell'abitato e necropoli ......................................................................................... 31 Figura 7 Siti del territorio caleno (da De Filippis – Passaro 2011)......................................................... 34 Figura 8 Materiali dalla fornace di Treglia (da Albore Livadie 2009): nn. 5-10 bucchero. .................... 36 Figura 9 Kolpos kymaios ........................................................................................................................ 39 Figura 10. Cuma. Pianta di E. Gabrici (1913). ....................................................................................... 41 Figura 11. Cuma. Area del Foro (rielaborazione da Tomeo 2017) ........................................................ 44 Figura 12 Capua. T. 1 Arco Felice: 1.1: Anforetta di bucchero (da Albore Livadie 1979); T. 548 Fornaci: 2.1-2.2: Oinochoe e kotyle di bucchero. ................................................................................................ 57 Figura 13 Capua. T. 271 Fuseruola di bucchero .................................................................................... 59 Figura 14 Capua. T. 271 Fornaci: bucchero ........................................................................................... 60 Figura 15 Capua. T. 615: disegno del fregio graffito dell'oinochoe 172597 ......................................... 62 Figura 16 Capua. T. 615: oinochoe 172597 ........................................................................................... 63 Figura 17 Capua. T. 615: oinochoai di bucchero ................................................................................... 64 Figura 18 Capua. T. 615: olla con decorazione sub-geometrica ........................................................... 66 Figura 19 Capua. T. 615: kotyle, calici e kantharos di bucchero ........................................................... 67 Figura 20 Capua. T. 615: oinochoai con decorazione sub-geometrica e kotyle di impasto .................. 68 Figura 21 Capua. T. 16: 1 oinochoe di bucchero; 2 olla su alto piede, 3 particolare dell'ansa dell'olla su alto piede .............................................................................................................................................. 70 Figura 22 Capua. T.16: anforetta e oinochoai di bucchero ................................................................... 71 Figura 23 Capua. T. 16: olla su alto piede, kotyle, calice e coppetta su alto piede di bucchero ........... 72 Figura 24 Capua. T. 1132: aryballos a testa di guerriero ....................................................................... 73 Figura 25 Capua. T. 1132: bucchero ...................................................................................................... 74 Figura 26 Capua. T. 43: bucchero .......................................................................................................... 76 Figura 27 Capua. T. 43: scarabeo .......................................................................................................... 76 Figura 28 Capua. T. 43: aryballoi ........................................................................................................... 76 Figura 29 Capua. T. 43: alabastra e aryballoi. ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Map 44 Latium-Campania Compiled by N
    Map 44 Latium-Campania Compiled by N. Purcell, 1997 Introduction The landscape of central Italy has not been intrinsically stable. The steep slopes of the mountains have been deforested–several times in many cases–with consequent erosion; frane or avalanches remove large tracts of regolith, and doubly obliterate the archaeological record. In the valley-bottoms active streams have deposited and eroded successive layers of fill, sealing and destroying the evidence of settlement in many relatively favored niches. The more extensive lowlands have also seen substantial depositions of alluvial and colluvial material; the coasts have been exposed to erosion, aggradation and occasional tectonic deformation, or–spectacularly in the Bay of Naples– alternating collapse and re-elevation (“bradyseism”) at a staggeringly rapid pace. Earthquakes everywhere have accelerated the rate of change; vulcanicity in Campania has several times transformed substantial tracts of landscape beyond recognition–and reconstruction (thus no attempt is made here to re-create the contours of any of the sometimes very different forerunners of today’s Mt. Vesuvius). To this instability must be added the effect of intensive and continuous intervention by humanity. Episodes of depopulation in the Italian peninsula have arguably been neither prolonged nor pronounced within the timespan of the map and beyond. Even so, over the centuries the settlement pattern has been more than usually mutable, which has tended to obscure or damage the archaeological record. More archaeological evidence has emerged as modern urbanization spreads; but even more has been destroyed. What is available to the historical cartographer varies in quality from area to area in surprising ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeometric Study of Roman Pottery from Caudium Area (Southern Italy)
    De Bonis_periodico 06/09/10 10.51 Pagina 73 Period. Mineral. (2010), 79, 2, 73-89 doi: 10.2451/2010PM0011 http://go.to/permin An International Journal of PerIodICo di MInerAlogIA MINERALOGY, CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, GEOCHEMISTRY, established in 1930 ORE DEPOSITS, PETROLOGY, VOLCANOLOGY and applied topics on Environment , Archeometry and Cultural Heritage Archaeometric study of roman pottery from Caudium area (Southern Italy) Alberto De bonis 1 *, C elestino GrifA 2, A lessio lAnGellA 2, M AriAno MerCurio 2, M AriA luisA Perrone 3 and VinCenzo MorrA 1 1 Dipartimento di scienze della terra, università degli studi federico ii, Via Mezzocannone, 8, 80134 napoli, italy. 2 Dipartimento di studi Geologici ed Ambientali, università degli studi del sannio, Via dei Mulini, 59/A, 82100 benevento, italy. 3 Via r. Morghen, 61/C, 80129, napoli, italy. Submitted, April 2010 - Accepted, July 2010 AbstrACt - Aim of this work is the minero- quartzarenite clasts. Multivariate statistical analysis petrographical characterization of late antique painted (Hierarchical Clustering and Principal Component common wares from the ancient roman settlement of Analysis) confirms the already identified groups. Caudium (today Montesarchio, Campania region, Mineralogical analyses and scanning electron italy). microscope observations of the sintering degree of twenty-two samples (4 th to 6 th century AD) clayey paste enabled to evaluate the firing collected during the archaeological survey of the area, temperatures of the most representative samples (from were studied to investigate their manufacturing 800 to 1200°C). technology and to attest a possible local production. the whole data set, along with geological features Ceramics shards are represented by 16 painted of the investigated area (wide availability of raw common ware samples; furthermore, 2 bricks, 2 kiln materials) and archaeological evidences (kiln refuses, rejects and 2 fragments of cooking ware were large number of fragments of the same ceramic class), investigated for comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • Tituli Honorarii, Monumentale Eregedenktekens. Ere-Inscripties Ten Tijde Van Het Principaat Op Het Italisch Schiereiland
    Annelies De Bondt 2e licentie Geschiedenis Optie Oude Geschiedenis Stnr. 20030375 Faculteit van de Letteren en Wijsbegeerte Vakgroep Oude Geschiedenis van Europa Blandijnberg 2 9000 Gent Tituli honorarii, monumentale eregedenktekens. Ere-inscripties ten tijde van het Principaat op het Italisch schiereiland. Een statistisch-epigrafisch onderzoek. Fascis 3: Inventaris. Promotor: Prof. Dr. Robert DUTHOY Licentiaatsverhandeling voorgedragen tot Leescommissarissen: Prof. Dr. Dorothy PIKHAUS het behalen van de graad van A Dr. Koenraad VERBOVEN Licentiaat/Master in de geschiedenis. Inventaris 0. Inhoudsopgave 0. Inhoudsopgave 1 1. Inleiding 5 1.1. Verantwoording nummering 5 1.2. Diakritische tekens 6 1.3. Bibliografie en gebruikte afkortingen. 6 2. Inventaris 9 Regio I, Latium et Campania 9 Latium Adjectum 9 Aletrium 9 Fundi 17 Anagnia 9 Interamna Lirenas 18 Antium 10 Minturnae 19 Aquinum 11 Privernum 20 Ardea 11 Rocca d’Arce 20 Atina 12 Setia 21 Casinum 12 Signia 21 Cereatae Marianae 13 Sinuessa 21 Circeii 13 Suessa Aurunca 21 Cora 13 Sura 23 Fabrateria Vetus 14 Tarracina 23 Ferentinum 15 Velitrae 23 Formiae 16 Verulae 23 Latium Vetus 24 Albanum 24 Lavinium 28 Bovillae 24 Ostia Antica 30 Castel di Decima 25 Portus 37 Castrimoenium 25 Praeneste 37 Gabiae 26 Tibur 39 Labico 27 Tusculum 42 Lanuvium 27 Zagarollo 43 Campania 44 Abella 44 Neapolis 56 Abellinum 44 Nola 56 Acerrae 45 Nuceria 57 Afilae 45 Pompei 57 Allifae 45 Puteoli 58 Caiatia 46 Salernum 62 Cales 47 Stabiae 63 Capua 48 Suessula 63 Cubulteria 50 Surrentum 64 Cumae 50 Teanum Sidicinum
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Dramatic Monuments from the Athenian Agora and Pnyx
    GREEK DRAMATIC MONUMENTS FROM THE ATHENIAN AGORA AND PNYX (PLATES 65-68) T HE excavations of the Athenian Agora and of the Pnyx have produced objects dating from the early fifth century B.C. to the fifth century after Christ which can be termed dramatic monuments because they represent actors, chorusmen, and masks of tragedy, satyr play and comedy. The purpose of the present article is to interpret the earlier part of this series from the point of view of the history of Greek drama and to compare the pieces with other monuments, particularly those which can be satisfactorily dated.' The importance of this Agora material lies in two facts: first, the vast majority of it is Athenian; second, much of it is dated by the context in which it was found. Classical tragedy and satyr play, Hellenistic tragedy and satyr play, Old, Middle and New Comedy will be treated separately. The transition from Classical to Hellenistic in tragedy or comedy is of particular interest, and the lower limit has been set in the second century B.C. by which time the transition has been completed. The monuments are listed in a catalogue at the end. TRAGEDY AND SATYR PLAY CLASSICAL: A 1-A5 HELLENISTIC: A6-A12 One of the earliest, if not the earliest, representations of Greek tragedy is found on the fragmentary Attic oinochoe (A 1; P1. 65) dated about 470 and painted by an artist closely related to Hermonax. Little can be added to Miss Talcott's interpre- tation. The order of the fragments is A, B, C as given in Figure 1 of Miss T'alcott's article.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 16 Winter 2014
    Volume 16 Winter 2014 Tomb 6423 At right, the Below is the A Digger’s View: lastra sealing chamber as The Tomb of the Hanging the chamber found at the The perspective of a field Aryballos, Tarquinia shown in situ. moment of archaeologist by Alessandro Mandolesi Above it is the opening, by Maria Rosa Lucidi another lastra on the back The University of Turin and the possibly reut- wall a little The discovery of the tomb of the Superintendency for the Archaeological ilzed spolia aryballos still “hanging aryballos" has aroused great Heritage of Southern Etruria have been interest among the public in both Italy taken from hangs on its investigating the Tumulus of the Queen and internationally. The integrity of the original nail. and the necropolis surrounding it, the the tumulus unviolated tomb is definitely one of the Doganaccia, since 2008. The excava- of the queen, (photographs reasons for the attention it has received. tions have brought forth many important which stands by Massimo The uniqueness is even more pro- and unexpected results, thanks to subse- nearby. Legni). nounced when one considers that since quent research, and the infor- the second half of the nine- mation relating to the differ- teenth century the English ent phases of its use has made traveler George Dennis it possible to clarify many blamed the inability to recov- obscure points about the great er the contexts from intact era of the monumental tumuli chamber tombs in Etruscan at Tarquinia. Tarquinia on repeated looting Archaeologists working since ancient times. The
    [Show full text]
  • Soprintendenza Per I Beni Archeologici Di Salerno, Avellino, Benevento E Caserta
    Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici di Salerno, Avellino, Benevento e Caserta Giornata nazionale dell’archeologia, del patrimonio artistico e del restauro Domenica 7 dicembre 2014 Provincia di Avellino Avellino - Ex Carcere Borbonico Tutela, salvaguardia, recupero e restauro del patrimonio archeologico. Apertura del laboratorio di restauro e presentazione delle tecniche di restauro utilizzate per il primo intervento sui materiali provenienti dagli scavi. Contestualmente verranno illustrati i procedimenti amministrativi che normalmente vengono elaborati prima del decreto di vincolo dal personale del settore Tutela e dal personale del Settore Disegni, e saranno illustrati dei grafici e i giornali di scavo. Orario: dalle 16.00 alle 20.00 “Avellino in posa. Esplorazioni archeologiche in città” Si effettueranno visite guidate con il personale di questa Amministrazione alla mostra archeologica “Avellino in posa. Esplorazioni archeologiche in città” che esporrà reperti archeologici venuti alla luce durante le campagne di scavi degli anni ’80 del secolo scorso. Si illustrerà l’iter a cui un reperto è sottoposto, dalla sua scoperta alla musealizzazione. Orario: dalle 16.00 alle 20.00 Contatti: Tel. 0825/784265 – Fax 0825/793728; e-mail: [email protected] Ariano Irpino – Antiquarium Inaugurazione mostra fotografica “La Regina Viarum e la via Traiana”, con presentazione del catalogo patrocinato dall’Università del Salento e dalla British School at Rome Archive. Ariano Irpino si configura come luogo ideale per la presentazione di questa mostra, dal momento che la via Traiana attraversa il centro di Aequum Tuticum e che proprio a Sant’Eleuterio, nel corso di ricognizioni effettuate con il Prof. Ceraudo, è stato riconosciuto il tracciato alternativo a quello proposto da Ashby.
    [Show full text]
  • Monti Tifatini Monte Tifata (603 M) Da Sant'angelo in Formis 5 Maggio 2019
    Monti Tifatini Monte Tifata (603 m) da Sant’Angelo in Formis In occasione della 12ima Passeggiata sul Tifata Intersezionale con sezione CAI di Caserta 5 maggio 2019 Direttori: ONC Pasquale Sgambato - CAI Benevento (349.8483016); Giuseppe Spina – CAI Caserta (333.3838602) Tipo di percorso: anello Difficoltà: E – (difficoltà escursionistica) Durata: 5 (escluse le soste) Dislivello: 570 m circa Lunghezza: 11,3 km Attrezzatura: Calzature e abbigliamento adeguati; k-way, ma anche cappellini ed occhiali per il sole; più che consigliati i bastoncini; almeno litri 1,5 di acqua; leggero pranzo al sacco, che verrà integrato dall’accoglienza dell’ “Associazione Storia Locale San Prisco”, nell’ambito della “12sima Passeggiata sul Tifata”. Appuntamenti ore 7.00 Appuntamento a Piazza Risorgimento e partenza per Sant’Angelo in Formis con auto proprie entro le ore 7.15. ore 8.30 Raduno a Sant’Angelo in Formis nella piazzetta antistante la Basilica e visita della Basilica. ore 9.00 Inizio escursione. ore 18.00 Orario presunto di termine dell’escursione. A V V E R T E N Z E La partecipazione all’escursione, per il tramite del CAI, richiede il rispetto delle disposizioni relative alla prenotazione ed alla copertura assicurativa. Solo per questi, il CAI assume responsabilità per eventuali eventi dannosi, che si dovessero verificare. PER INFORMAZIONI E ADESIONI Pasquale Sgambato (349.8483016) Descrizione del percorso Dalla piazzetta, appena prima della Basilica, ci si incammina, tra il bar ed il ristorante “BorgAntico”, sulla strada cementata in decisa salita, da seguire fino all'azienda De Angelis; da qui, si prosegue su sentiero fino al limite posteriore della suddetta azienda.
    [Show full text]
  • V2017-Sinuessa.Pdf
    SINUESSA, UN APPRODO SOMMERSO DI EPOCA ROMANA Archeologia, geomorfologia costiera, strategie sostenibili di valorizzazione Monografia a cura di Micla Pennetta e Alfredo Trocciola 2017 ENEA Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile ISBN: 978-88-8286-340-1 Revisione editoriale: Giuliano Ghisu Copertina: Flavio Miglietta Foto in copertina: immagine del fondo marino, acquisita con indagini side-scan sonar, che mostra le “Pilae di Sinuessa” collocate in una vasta depressione di un banco tufaceo caratterizzato da una morfologia articolata SINUESSA, UN APPRODO SOMMERSO DI EPOCA ROMANA Archeologia, geomorfologia costiera, strategie sostenibili di valorizzazione A cura di Micla Pennetta e Alfredo Trocciola La monografia raccoglie i contribuiti di studi e ricerche condotti negli ultimi anni nell’area archeologica marina di Sinuessa nel golfo di Gaeta in Campania. Alla realizzazione del volume hanno contribuito diversi autori, specialisti in differenti discipline quali la geo- morfologia costiera, archeologia e beni culturali con la finalità di suggerire agli amministratori e stakeholder del litorale domitio strategie sostenibili per la valorizzazione dell’approdo sommerso di epoca romana. Presentazione di: Claudio Zucchelli Contributi di: Paolo Caputo, Sergio Cascella, Vera Corbelli, Veronica D’Ambrosio, Alberto De Bonis, Tiziana Di Luccio, Carlo Donadio, Carmine Minopoli, Angela Mormone, Vincenzo Morra, Raffaella Nappi, Micla Pennetta, Raffaele Pica, Monica Piochi, Maria Grazia Ruggi d’Aragona, Rosario
    [Show full text]
  • China and Italy: Routes of Culture, Valorisation and Management
    N° 3 CHINA AND ITALY: ROUTES OF CULTURE, VALORISATION AND MANAGEMENT Edited by Heleni Porfyriou and Bing Yu Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CHINA AND ITALY: ROUTES OF CULTURE, VALORISATION AND MANAGEMENT Edited by Heleni Porfyriou And Bing Yu This series of volumes comprises research outputs that have been achieved due to the financial contribution of the National Research Council of Italy (CNR) and the the Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage (CACH) within the context of a Bilateral Agreement of Scientific and Technological Cooperation between these two Institutions. SCIENTIFIC EDITORIAL BOARD: Chai Xiaoming, Director of the Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage - CACH Gilberto Corbellini, Director of the Department of Social and Human Sciences, Cultural Heritage of the National Research Council of Italy – CNR Dora Di Francesco, Italian Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activities – MiBACT, General Secretariat, Service II Luigi Scaroina, MiBACT, General Secretariat, Service II Maria Grazia Filetici, MiBACT, Colosseum Archaelogical Park Bing Yu, CACH Heleni Porfyriou, CNR ICVBC (Institute for the Conservation and Valorization of the Cultural Heritage) © Cnr Edizioni, 2018 P.le Aldo Moro 7 00185 Roma ISBN versione cartacea 978 88 8080 321 8 ISBN versione elettronica 978 88 8080 322 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 5 Gilberto Corbellini ........................................................................................................................ 5 Chai Xiaoming .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Attic Pottery of the Later Fifth Century from the Athenian Agora
    ATTIC POTTERY OF THE LATER FIFTH CENTURY FROM THE ATHENIAN AGORA (PLATES 73-103) THE 1937 campaign of the American excavations in the Athenian Agora included work on the Kolonos Agoraios. One of the most interesting results was the discovery and clearing of a well 1 whose contents proved to be of considerable value for the study of Attic pottery. For this reason it has seemed desirable to present the material as a whole.2 The well is situated on the southern slopes of the Kolonos. The diameter of the shaft at the mouth is 1.14 metres; it was cleared to the bottom, 17.80 metres below the surface. The modern water-level is 11 metres down. I quote the description from the excavator's notebook: The well-shaft, unusually wide and rather well cut widens towards the bottom to a diameter of ca. 1.50 m. There were great quantities of pot- tery, mostly coarse; this pottery seems to be all of the same period . and joins In addition to the normal abbreviations for periodicals the following are used: A.B.C. A n tiquites du Bosphore Cimmerien. Anz. ArchaiologischerAnzeiger. Deubner Deubner, Attische Feste. FR. Furtwangler-Reichhold, Griechische Vasenmxlerei. Kekule Kekule, Die Reliefs an der Balustrade der Athena Nike. Kraiker Kraiker,Die rotfigurigenattischen Vasen (Collectionof the ArchaeologicalIn- stitute of Heidelberg). Langlotz Langlotz, Griechische Vasen in Wiirzburg. ML. Monumenti Antichi Pu'bblicatiper Cura della Reale Accadenia dei Lincei. Rendiconti Rendiconti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei. Richter and Hall Richter and Hall, Red-Figured Athenian Vases in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Felice Senatore
    Felice Senatore La cosiddetta ‘lega campana’. Karl Julius Beloch e la ‘nascita storiografica’ di un Gauverband* Tre Gauverbände sarebbero esistiti in Campania, secondo Karl Julius Beloch1 , e se la ‘federazione cantonale’ relativa a Nuceria può considerarsi, in fin dei conti, ‘il frutto’ della prima attività di ricerca del giovane studioso tedesco2 , quella relativa a Capua ha invece avuto origine da un’osservazione di Theodor Mommsen («das Bestehen dieses Bundes hat zuerst Mommsen erkannt»)3 , ripresa e rafforzata dal Beloch nel suo Campanien. Il Mommsen, infatti, aveva rilevato la subordinazione a Capua delle comunità limitrofe più piccole4 , e si era chiesto se la circostanza per cui Atella, Calatia e Velecha avevano coniato solo i nominali più piccoli, in bronzo, non potesse essere * Dedico questo saggio all’amico Antonino Cafiero, la cui sensibilità e gentilezza ci mancherà. 1 «Ein politisches Band hat alle Campaner niemals vereint; wohl aber schlossen sich die Nachbarstädte zu kleinerem Gauverbände zusammen. So Nuceria und die anderen Städte des Sarnusthals: Stabiae, Surrentum, Pompei, Herculaneum; Nola mit Abella und später vielleicht mit Hyria; Capua mit Atella, Calatia, Casilinum und anderen» (Beloch 1879, p. 11). Della ‘lega nucerina’ mi sono occupato alcuni anni fa, cercando di mettere in luce la debolezza degli argomenti portati dal Beloch a sostegno della sua tesi e l’impossibilità, pertanto, di dimostrare l’esistenza di un Gauverband incentrato su Nuceria (vd. Senatore 2001, e ora l’articolo di L. Cerchiai, in questo volume, p. 226). Per quanto riguarda la presunta ‘federazione’ nolano-abellana («Bundesverhältniss», in Beloch 1890, p. 394), è evidente che la sua esistenza sia stata suggerita dal trattato tra Nola e Abella riportato nel cippo abellano: tuttavia, al di là dell’affermarne l’esistenza, non mi pare che finora ne siano state fornite prove, né che si sia cercato di darne una definizione costituzionale precisa: oltre al Beloch, vd.
    [Show full text]
  • Dionysiac Imagery in Archaic Etruria Dimitris Paleothodoros University of Thessaly
    Etruscan Studies Journal of the Etruscan Foundation Volume 10 Article 15 2007 Dionysiac Imagery in Archaic Etruria Dimitris Paleothodoros University of Thessaly Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies Recommended Citation Paleothodoros, Dimitris (2007) "Dionysiac Imagery in Archaic Etruria," Etruscan Studies: Vol. 10 , Article 15. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies/vol10/iss1/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Etruscan Studies by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dionysiac Imagery in Archaic Etruria by Dimitris Paleothodoros he emergence of Etruscan Dionysiac iconography was made possibLe by the adop - tion and imitation of prototypes found on imported Attic vases 1. The first TDionysiac images produced by Etruscan craftsmen date to 550 BC and are found on bLacK-figured vases by the Paris Painter, and the painters of the Ivy-Leaf and the La ToLfa Groups. Between the mid 6th and mid 5th centuries BC, Etruscan artists decorate aLmost 170 bLacK-figured and added-red vases with Dionysiac images, 13% of the totaL pro - duction of figured vases. 2 This group of images, suppLemented by other pieces of evidence, such as mirror engravings and bronze statuettes, forms the basis of the present study, which is the preLiminary report of a thorough investigation of Dionysus in archaic Etruria. In the recent past, schoLars have deveLoped the concept of “Dionysism without Dionysus,” to account for the paradox of the scarcity of Dionysus’ images in archaic Etruria, in contrast to the great popuLarity of images of his foLLowers, i.e.
    [Show full text]