Gershom Scholem

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gershom Scholem KABBALAH GERSHOM SCHOLEM @ A MERIDIAN BOOK NEW AMERICAN LIBRARY NEW YORK AND SCARBOROUGH, ONTARIO NAL BOOKS ARE AVAILABLE AT QUANTITY DISCOUNTS WHEN USED TO PROMOTE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE WRITE TO PREMIUM MARKETING DIVISION, NEW AMERICAN LIBRARY, I633 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, NEW YORK I00I9. Copyright© I974 by Keter Publishing House Jerusalem Ltd. P.O. Box 7I45, Jerusalem, Israel All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form. For information address Times Books (The New York Times Book Company, Inc.) 3 Park Avenue, New York, New York IOOI6 This is an authorized reprint of a hardcover edition published by Times Books. MERIDIAN TRADEMARK REG. U.S. PAT. OFF. AND FOREIGN COUNTRIES REGISTERED TRADEMARK-MARCA REGISTRADA HECHO EN WESTFORD, MASS., U.S.A. SIGNET, SIGNET CLASSIC, MENTOR, PLUME, MERIDIAN and NAL BOOKS are published in the United States by New American Library, I633 Broadway, New York, New York IOOI9, in Canada by The New American Library of Canada Limited, 81 Mack Avenue, Scarborough, Ontario MIL IMS First Meridian Printing, March, I978 6 7 8 9 IO II I2 I3 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA KABBAlAH CONTENTS PART ONE: KABBALAH 1. INTRODUCTION 3 General notes 3 Terms used for Kabbalah 6 2. THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF KABBALAH 8 The Early Beginnings of Mysticism and Esotericism 8 Apocalyptic Esotericism and Merkabah Mysticism I 0 Esoteric Literature: the Heikhalot, the Ma'aseh Beres hit, and the Literature of Magic 14 Jewish Gnosis and the Sefer Yezirah 21 Mysticism in the Geonic Period 30 J:lasidic Movements in Europe and Egypt 35 The Establishment of Kabbalah in Provence 42 The Kabbalist Center of Gerona 48 Other Currents in 13th Century Spanish Kabbalah 52 The Kabbalah in the 14th Century up to the Expulsion from Spain 61 The Kabbalah after the Expulsion from Spain and the New Center in Safed 67 The Kabbalah in Later Times 79 3. THE BASIC IDEAS OF KABBALAH 87 God and Creation 88 Emanation and the Concept of the Sejirot 96 Details of the Doctrine of the Sejirot and their Symbolism I 05 Earlier Worlds, Lower Worlds, and Cosmic Cycles (the Doctrine of Shemittot) 116 The Problem of Evil 122 The Doctrine of Creation in Lurianic Kabbalah 128 The Kabbalah and Pan theism 144 Man and his Soul (Psychology and Anthropology of the Kabbalah) 152 Exile and Redemption 165 The Torah and its Significance 168 The Mystic Way 174 Practical Kabbalah 182 4. THE WIDER INFLUENCES OF AND RESEARCH ON KABBALAH 190 The Influence of Kabbalah on Judaism 190 The Christian Kabbalah 196 Scholarship and the Kabbalah 201 Bibliography 203 PART TWO: TOPICS 211 I. The Zohar 213 2. Shabbetai ?:eviand the Shabbatean Movement 244 3. Jacob Frank and the Frankists 287 4. Ba'al Shem 310 5. Sefer ha-Bahir 312 6. Chiromancy 317 7. Demonology in Kabbalah 320 8. The Doenmeh 327 9. Eschatology 333 10. Gematria 337 II. Gilgul 344 12. Go/em 351 13. Lilith 356 14. Magen David 362 IS. Meditation 369 16. Merkabah Mysticism 373 17. Metatron 377 18. Providence 382 19. Samael 385 PART THREE: PERSONALITIES 389 I. Azriel of Gerona 391 2. Naphtali Bacharach 394 3. Abraham Miguel Cardozo 396 4. Moses Cordovero (by J.B. Ben Shlomo) 40 1 5. Jonathan Eybeschuetz 405 6. Joseph Gikatilla 409 7. Nehemiah J::Iayon 412 8. Christian Knorr von Rosenroth 416 9. Isaac Luria 420 10. I:IayyimMalakh 429 II. Moses ben Shem Tov de Leon 432 12. Nathan of Gaza 435 13. Judah Leib Prossnitz 441 14. I:Iayyim Vital 443 15. Moses Zacuto 449 16. Joshua Heshel :?oref 452 Notes 455 Abbreviations 460 Glossary 463 Illustration Credits 465 General Index 467 Index of Books 484 (Dates in parentheses appearing after titles of books in the text refer to date of firstor primary'edition .] Part ()nc KABBALAH 1 INTRODUCTION GENERAL NOTES "Kabbalah" is the traditional and most commonly used term for the esoteric teachings of Judaism and fo r Jewish mysticism, especially the forms which it assumed in the Middle Ages from the 12th century onward. In its wider sense it signifies all the successive esoteric movements in Judaism that evolved from the end of the period of the Second Temple and became active factors in Jewish history. Kabbalah is a unique phenomenon, and should not be considered to be ident­ ical with what is known in the history of religion as "mysticism." It is mysticism in fact; but at the same time it is both esotericism and theosophy. In what sense it may be called mysticism depends on the definition of the term, a matter of dispute among scholars. If the term is restricted to the profound yearning for direct human communion with God through annihilation of individuality (bittul ha-yesh in I:tasidic terminology), then only a fe w manifestations of Kabbalah can be designated as such, because few kabbalists sought this goal, let alone formu­ lated it openly as their final aim. However, Kabbalah may be considered mysti­ cism insofar as it seeks an apprehension of God and creation whose intrinsic elements are beyond the grasp of the intellect, although this is seldom explicitly belittled or rejected by the kabbalists. Essentially these elements were perceived through contemplation and illumir.ation, which is often presented in the Kabba­ lah as the transmission of a primeval revelation concerning the nature of the Torah and other religious matters. In essence, however, the Kabbalah is far removed from the rational and intellectual approach to religion. This was the case even among those kabbalists who thought that basically religion was subject to rational enquiry, or that, at least, there was some accord between the path of intellectual perception and the development of the mystical approach to the subject of creation. For some kabbalists the intellect itself became a mystical phenomenon_ So we find in Kabbalah a paradoxical emphasis on the congruence between intuition and tradition. It is this emphasis, together with the historical association already hinted at in the term "kabbalah" (something handed down by tradition), that points to the basic differences between the Kabbalah and other kinds of religious mysticism which are less closely identified with a 3 4 KABBALAH people'shistory. Nevertheless, there are elements common to Kabbalah and both Greek and Christianmysticism, and even historical links between them. Like other kinds of mysticism, Kabbalah too draws upon the mystic's aware­ ness of both the transcendence of God and His immanence within the true religious life, every facet of which is a revelation of God, although God Himself is most clearly perceived through man's introspection. This dual and apparently contradictory experience of the self-concealing and self-revealing God deter­ mines the essential sphere of mysticism, while at the same time it obstructs other religious conceptions. The second element in Kabbalah is that of theosophy, which seeks to reveal the mysteries of the hidden life of God and the relation­ ships between the divine life on the one hand and the life of man and creation on the other. Speculations of this type occupy a large and conspicuous area in kabbalistic teaching. Sometimes their connection with the mystical plane be­ comes rather tenuous and is superseded by an interpretative and homiletical vein which occasionally even results in a kind of kabbalistic pilpul (casuistry). In its form the Kabbalah became to a large extent an esoteric doctrine. Mystical and esotericelements coexist in Kabbalah in a highly confusing fashion. By its very nature, mysticism is knowledge that cannot be communicated direct­ ly but may be expressed only through symbol and metaphor. Esoteric know­ ledge, however, in theory can be transmitted, but those who possess it are either forbidden to pass it on or do not wish to do so. The kabbalists stressed this esoteric aspect by imposing all kinds of limitations on the propagation of their teachings, either with regard to the age of the initiates, the ethical qualities required of them, or the number of students before whom these teachings could be expounded. Typical of this is the account of the conditions fo r initiates in Kabbalah found in Moses Cordovero's Or Ne 'erav. Often these limitations were disregarded in practice, despite the protests of many kabbalists. The printing of kabbalistic books and the influence of Kabbalah on widening circles broke down such restrictions, especially as far as the teachings on God and man were con­ cerned. Nevertheless, there remained areas where these limitations were still more or less adhered to; for example, in the meditations on the letter­ combinations (l:zokhmatha-?eruf) and practical Kabbalah. Many kabbalists denied the existence of any kind of historical development in the Kabbalah. They saw it as a kind of primordial revelation that was accorded · to Adam or the early generations and that endured, although new revelations were made from time to time, particularly wheh the tradition had been either forgotten or interrupted. This notion of the nature of esoteric wisdom was expressed in apocryphal works like the Book of Enoch, was again stressed in the Zohar, and served as the basis fo r the dissemination of kabbalistic teaching in Sefer ha-Emunot by Shem Tov b. Shem Tov (c. 1400) and in Avodat ha-Kodesh INTRODUCTION 5 by Meir b. Gabbai (1567). It became widely accepted that the Kabbalah was the esoteric part of the Oral Law given to Moses at Sinai. Several of the genealogies of the tradition appearing in kabbalistic literature, which were intended to sup­ port the idea of the continuity of the secret tradition, are themselves faulty and misconceived, lacking in any historical value.
Recommended publications
  • Freeze” Their Faith Into an Unchanging Solid
    KosherTorah School for Biblical, Judaic & Spiritual Studies www.koshertorah.com email. [email protected] Ariel Bar Tzadok, Director, Rabbi Shalom, Welcome to the KosherTorah School of R. Ariel B. Tzadok. Here is a selection of my writings which outline the foundations, and teachings of our School. If you find yourself in agreement with our beliefs, and principles, please consider joining us, and become a contributing member of our School. Your support is always welcome, and needed. Here now is our 1. Statement of 42 Princples. 2. Introduction into KosherTorah Kabbalah, and 3. The Book of Analysis, an in-depth series of lessons about faith, and Kabbalah. Enjoy your time here at the KosherTorah School. Learn well! Blessings, Ariel Bar Tzadok ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Statement of 42 Principles of the KosherTorah School for Biblical, Judaic & Spiritual Studies by Ariel Bar Tzadok Let it be known by the following statements the principles, beliefs and truths that I hold sacred and upon which I have built the KosherTorah School. 1. I believe in God. 2. It is because that I believe in God that I am also able to believe in my fellow man. 3. I believe that God created us all, and in spite of our differences, be they those made by God, or those made by us, we are all children of God, created in the Divine Image. 1 Copyright © 1993-2019 by Ariel Bar Tzadok. All rights reserved. KosherTorah School for Biblical, Judaic & Spiritual Studies www.koshertorah.com email. [email protected] Ariel Bar Tzadok, Director, Rabbi 4. I believe that being created in the Divine Image gives each of us a responsibility and obligation, to respect one another, and to care for one another, that this, above all else, is our human calling, and what defines for us our humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft Dissertation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Arbiters of the Afterlife: Olam Haba, Torah and Rabbinic Authority A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures by Candice Liliane Levy 2013 © Copyright by Candice Liliane Levy 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Arbiters of the Afterlife: Olam Haba, Torah and Rabbinic Authority by Candice Liliane Levy Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Languages and Cultures University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Carol Bakhos, Chair As the primary stratum of the rabbinic corpus, the Mishna establishes a dynamic between rabbinic authority and olam haba that sets the course for all subsequent rabbinic discussions of the idea. The Mishna Sanhedrin presents the rabbis as arbiters of the afterlife, who regulate its access by excluding a set of individuals whose beliefs or practices undermine the nature of rabbinic authority and their tradition. In doing so, the Mishna evinces the foundational tenets of rabbinic Judaism and delineates the boundaries of ‘Israel’ according to the rabbis. Consequently, as arbiters of the afterlife, the rabbis constitute Israel and establish normative thought and practice in this world by means of the world to come. ii There have been surprisingly few studies on the afterlife in rabbinic literature. Many of the scholars who have undertaken to explore the afterlife in Judaism have themselves remarked upon the dearth of attention this subject has received. For the most part, scholars have sought to identify what the rabbis believed with regard to the afterlife and how they envisioned its experience, rather than why they held such beliefs or how the afterlife functioned within the rabbinic tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Samaritan Attitude As Reflected in Rabbinic Midrashim
    religions Article The Anti‑Samaritan Attitude as Reflected in Rabbinic Midrashim Andreas Lehnardt Faculty of Protestant Theology, Johannes Gutenberg‑University Mainz, 55122 Mainz, Germany; lehnardt@uni‑mainz.de Abstract: Samaritans, as a group within the ranges of ancient ‘Judaisms’, are often mentioned in Talmud and Midrash. As comparable social–religious entities, they are regarded ambivalently by the rabbis. First, they were viewed as Jews, but from the end of the Tannaitic times, and especially after the Bar Kokhba revolt, they were perceived as non‑Jews, not reliable about different fields of Halakhic concern. Rabbinic writings reflect on this change in attitude and describe a long ongoing conflict and a growing anti‑Samaritan attitude. This article analyzes several dialogues betweenrab‑ bis and Samaritans transmitted in the Midrash on the book of Genesis, Bereshit Rabbah. In four larger sections, the famous Rabbi Me’ir is depicted as the counterpart of certain Samaritans. The analyses of these discussions try to show how rabbinic texts avoid any direct exegetical dispute over particular verses of the Torah, but point to other hermeneutical levels of discourse and the rejection of Samari‑ tan claims. These texts thus reflect a remarkable understanding of some Samaritan convictions, and they demonstrate how rabbis denounced Samaritanism and refuted their counterparts. The Rabbi Me’ir dialogues thus are an impressive literary witness to the final stages of the parting of ways of these diverging religious streams. Keywords: Samaritans; ancient Judaism; rabbinic literature; Talmud; Midrash Citation: Lehnardt, Andreas. 2021. The Anti‑Samaritan Attitude as 1 Reflected in Rabbinic Midrashim. The attitudes towards the Samaritans (or Kutim ) documented in rabbinical literature 2 Religions 12: 584.
    [Show full text]
  • ALTERNATIVE KEVURA METHODS Jeremy Kalmanofsky
    Kalmanofsky, Spring 2017 Alternative Kevura Methods ALTERNATIVE KEVURA METHODS Jeremy Kalmanofsky This teshuvah was adopted by the CJLS on June 7, 2017, by a vote of 10 in favor, 7 opposed, and 3 abstaining. Members voting in favor: Rabbis Aaron Alexander, Pamela Barmash, Noah Bickart, Elliot Dorff, Joshua Heller, Jeremy Kalmanofsky, Amy Levin, Daniel Nevins, Micah Peltz, Avram Reisner and David Schuck. Members opposed: Rabbis Baruch Frydman-Kohl, Reuven Hammer, David Hoffman, Gail Labovitz, Jonathan Lubliner, and Paul Plotkin. Members abstaining: Rabbis Susan Grossman, Jan Kaufman, and Iscah Waldman, Question: Contemporary Jews sometimes seek alternative mortuary methods in order to be more ecologically sustainable and economical. Can Jews utilize alternative methods or is burial required? What does Halakhic tradition demand for how Jews treat dead bodies? Answer: The Torah’s very first chapters assert that human remains should decompose in the earth. Describing human mortality, God tells Adam [Genesis 3.19]: “You are dust and to dust you will return.” -Jewish treatment for human remains has always been in [לכתחילה] In this spirit, the optimal ground burial. The Torah legislates this norm at Deuteronomy 21:22-23:1 לֹא-תָלִין נִבְ לָתֹו עַל-הָעֵץ, כִ י-קָ בֹור תִ קְבְרֶ ּנּו בַּיֹום הַהּוא The Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly provides guidance in matters of halkhhah for the Conservative movement. The individual rabbi, however, is the authority for the interpretation and application of all matters of halakhah. 1 This commandment comes in the context of the rules for executing criminals. It might seem off-putting to base the treatment of all bodies upon this unfortunate paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • Sefer Otzrot Hayim the Treasury of Life by R
    KosherTorah School for Spiritual Studies KosherTorah School for Biblical, Judaic & Spiritual Studies P.O. Box 628 Tellico Plains, TN. 37385 tel. 423-253-3555 email. [email protected] www.KosherTorah.com Ariel Bar Tzadok, Director, Rabbi The Evolution of Collective Consciousness and Psychological Individuation. Sefer Otzrot Hayim the Treasury of Life by R. Hayim Vital Introduction into the Kabbalah of the Ari'zal (Lurianic System) Semester 1, Spring 2017 An audio course in 12 lessons, taught by Ariel Bar Tzadok Lesson 1 – The Creation of Consciousness. The primordial act of will, the beginning of individuation. An overall introduction into the Lurianic Kabbalah and the different schools that evolved within it. Why this system must be understood within the realm of psychology, and not in the realm of cosmology. All Lurianic terms, and concepts need to be understood within the context of the psychological. Reading from Sefer Ba'al Shem Tov (V'et'hanan 69). Tzimtzum. What exactly is a contraction of God? How must such concept be understood. How does our understanding of the primordial Tzimzum have any meaning, and value to our lives today. Reading from “The Psychology of Tzimtzum” by Mordechai Rotenberg. A deeper understanding from R. Vital's book, Mevo She'arim. Lesson 2 – Igulim and Yosher Why the Light of the Ayn Sof had to reemerge into the halal (Mevo Shearim). The two forms of primordial Light emanated into the Halal (vacuum) left after the Tzimtzum. Spheres and columns represent two different manifestations of the Will or Evolving Mind of the Ayn Sof. These two expressions are the original materialization of the two concepts that will later be known as external, and internal reality, force and form, soul, and body, mercy and severity, fluidity and rigidity.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Jews
    TH E H I STO RY O F TH E JEWS B Y fid t t at h menta l J B E 39 . b ) , iBb PROFES S OR WI H I T RY AND LI T RAT RE OF J E S H S O E U , B RE I LL G I I ATI W C C C o. HE UN ON O E E, N NN , S ECOND EDI TI ON Revised a nd E n la rged NEW YORK BLOCH PUBLI SHING COMPANY “ ” TH E J EWI SH B OOK CONCERN PYRI G T 1 1 0 1 2 1 CO H , 9 , 9 , B LOCH PUBLISHI NG COM PANY P re ss o f % i J . J L t t l e I m . 86 ve s Co p a n y w rk Y U . S . Ne . o , A TAB LE OF CONTENTS CH APTE R PAGE R M TH E AB YL I A APTI VI TY 86 B C To I . F O B ON N C , 5 , TH E TR CTI TH E EC D M PL DES U ON OF S ON TE E, 0 7 C E . R M TH E TR CTI R AL M 0 TO II . F O DES U ON OF JE US E , 7 , TH E MPL TI TH E I A CO E ON OF M SH N H , II - I . ERA TH E ALM D 200 600 OF T U , Religiou s Histo ry o f t h e Era IV. R M TH E I LA M 622 TO TH E ERA F O R SE OF IS , , OF TH E R AD 1 0 6 C US ES , 9 Literary Activity o f t h e P erio d - V.
    [Show full text]
  • Did the Rabbis Reject the Roman Public Latrine?
    1980-09_Babesch_13_Wilfand 24-08-2009 11:38 Pagina 183 BABESCH 84 (2009), 183-196. doi: 10.2143/BAB.84.0.2041644. Did the Rabbis Reject the Roman Public Latrine? Yael Wilfand Abstract This study examines archaeological evidence and rabbinic texts in order to challenge recent scholarly claims that the rabbis in Palestine rejected the Roman public latrine because of the lack of privacy during ‘bodily exertion’. By reevaluating both the written and material evidence within the appropriate geographical context (differenti- ating between Babylonian and Palestinian), I argue that there is no evidence that suggests rabbis living in Palestine rejected Roman public latrines. However, the evidence does suggest that in Babylonia, where Roman public latrines were not used, such a rejection did exist. In order to explain the different attitudes towards public latrines, I sug- gest that the Zoroastrian cultural environment may have influenced the Babylonian rabbis to develop their rejection.* INTRODUCTION modesty in the toilet in order to deter the Jewish population from using these facilities.4 They imply In his article ‘Slums, Sanitation, and Mortality in that for this reason, Roman public latrines were the Roman World’, Alex Scobie pointed out the found mainly in cities with a majority of gentiles, relation between privacy concerns and the design while in areas with a majority of Jews different of latrines: latrines were used.5 Privacy is ... felt to be a normal necessity in If such a rejection of the Roman latrine pre- modern Western societies, both for defecation vailed among the rabbis in Palestine, it may affect and sexual intercourse….
    [Show full text]
  • "El Misterio De La Creación Y El Árbol De La Vida En La Mística Judía: Una Interpretación Del Maasé Bereshit"
    "EL MISTERIO DE LA CREACIÓN Y EL ÁRBOL DE LA VIDA EN LA MÍSTICA JUDÍA: UNA INTERPRETACIÓN DEL MAASÉ BERESHIT" Mario Javier Saban Dipòsit Legal: T.1423-2012 ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs. ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis doctoral y su utilización debe respetar los derechos de la persona autora. Puede ser utilizada para consulta o estudio personal, así como en actividades o materiales de investigación y docencia en los términos establecidos en el art. 32 del Texto Refundido de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual (RDL 1/1996). Para otros usos se requiere la autorización previa y expresa de la persona autora.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbinic Judaism “Moses Received Torah F
    Feminist Sexual Ethics Project Introduction – Rabbinic Judaism “Moses received Torah from Sinai and handed it down to Joshua; and Joshua to the Elders; and the Elders to the Prophets; and the Prophets handed it down to the Men of the Great Assembly…” Mishnah Avot 1:1 Judaism is often believed to be a religion based primarily in the Hebrew Bible, or even more specifically, the first five books of the Bible, known in Jewish tradition as the Torah. These five books, in the form of a Torah scroll, are found in nearly every Jewish house of worship. “Torah,” however, is a term whose meaning can encompass far more than particular books; for Jews, “Torah” often also means the full scope of Jewish learning, law, practice, and tradition. This conception of Torah derives from the rabbis of late antiquity, who developed the belief that the written Torah was accompanied from its earliest transmission by an equally Divine “Oral Torah,” a body of law and explanations of the written Torah that was passed down by religious leaders and scholars through the ages of Jewish history. Thus, Jewish law and religious practices are based in far more than the biblical text. The rabbis considered themselves an integral link in this chain of transmission, and its heirs. In particular, the works produced by the rabbis of late antiquity, from the beginning of the Common Era to the time of the Muslim Conquest, in Roman Palestine and Sassanian Babylonia (modern day Iran/Iraq), have influenced the shape of Judaism to this day. The Talmud (defined below), for example, is considered the essential starting point for any discussion of Jewish law, even more so than the bible.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaism and the Ethics of War
    Volume 87 Number 858 June 2005 Judaism and the ethics of war Norman Solomon* Norman Solomon served as rabbi to Orthodox congregations in Britain, and since 1983 has been engaged in interfaith relations and in academic work, most recently at the University of Oxford. He has published several books on Judaism. Abstract The article surveys Jewish sources relating to the justification and conduct of war, from the Bible and rabbinic interpretation to recent times, including special problems of the State of Israel. It concludes with the suggestion that there is convergence between contemporary Jewish teaching, modern human rights doctrine and international law. : : : : : : : The sources and how to read them Judaism, like Christianity, has deep roots in the Hebrew scriptures (“Old Testament”), but it interprets those scriptures along lines classically formulated by the rabbis of the Babylonian Talmud, completed shortly before the rise of Islam. The Talmud is a reference point rather than a definitive statement; Judaism has continued to develop right up to the present day. To get some idea of how Judaism handles the ethics of war, we will review a selection of sources from the earliest scriptures to rabbinic discussion in contemporary Israel, thus over a period of three thousand years. The starting point for rabbinic thinking about war is the biblical legisla- tion set out in Deuteronomy 20. In form this is a military oration, concerned with jus in bello rather than jus ad bellum; it regulates conduct in war, but does not specify conditions under which it is appropriate to engage in war. It distin- guishes between (a) the war directly mandated by God against the Canaanites * For a fuller examination of this subject with bibliography see Norman Solomon, “Th e ethics of war in the Jewish tradition”, in Th e Ethics of War, Rochard Sorabji, David Robin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Narratology, Hermeneutics, and Midrash
    Poetik, Exegese und Narrative Studien zur jüdischen Literatur und Kunst Poetics, Exegesis and Narrative Studies in Jewish Literature and Art Band 2 / Volume 2 Herausgegeben von / edited by Gerhard Langer, Carol Bakhos, Klaus Davidowicz, Constanza Cordoni Constanza Cordoni / Gerhard Langer (eds.) Narratology, Hermeneutics, and Midrash Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Narratives from the Late Antique Period through to Modern Times With one figure V&R unipress Vienna University Press Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. ISBN 978-3-8471-0308-0 ISBN 978-3-8470-0308-3 (E-Book) Veröffentlichungen der Vienna University Press erscheineN im Verlag V&R unipress GmbH. Gedruckt mit freundlicher Unterstützung des Rektorats der Universität Wien. © 2014, V&R unipress in Göttingen / www.vr-unipress.de Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk und seine Teile sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung in anderen als den gesetzlich zugelassenen Fällen bedarf der vorherigen schriftlichen Einwilligung des Verlages. Printed in Germany. Titelbild: „splatch yellow“ © Hazel Karr, Tochter der Malerin Lola Fuchs-Carr und des Journalisten und Schriftstellers Maurice Carr (Pseudonym von Maurice Kreitman); Enkelin der bekannten jiddischen Schriftstellerin Hinde-Esther Singer-Kreitman (Schwester von Israel Joshua Singer und Nobelpreisträger Isaac Bashevis Singer) und Abraham Mosche Fuchs. Druck und Bindung: CPI Buch Bücher.de GmbH, Birkach Gedruckt auf alterungsbeständigem Papier. Contents Constanza Cordoni / Gerhard Langer Introduction .................................. 7 Irmtraud Fischer Reception of Biblical texts within the Bible: A starting point of midrash? . 15 Ilse Muellner Celebration and Narration. Metaleptic features in Ex 12:1 – 13,16 .
    [Show full text]
  • Oral and Written Communication and Transmission of Knowledge in Ancient Judaism and Christianity
    Oral Tradition, 25/1 (2010): 75-92 Oral and Written Communication and Transmission of Knowledge in Ancient Judaism and Christianity Catherine Hezser In antiquity, when no telephones, postal services, and internet connections existed, the transfer of information and knowledge depended on direct or indirect contacts and personal mediation.1 If one wanted to ask someone’s advice or tell him or her something, one would either have to go and visit that person oneself or send an oral or written message through an intermediary.2 Only face-to-face communications would guarantee the reliable transmission of the words and opinions of one person to another, whereas mediated messages would always be suspected of misrepresentation or even forgery. Face-to-face communication could easily be conducted with one’s immediate neighbors and fellow villagers or townspeople. In the case of more distant communication partners, a larger effort would have to be made to reach them. In such cases, communication would be intrinsically linked to mobility, either one’s own or that of one’s messengers.3 Only the most mobile members of a particular social group, and those who had the greatest access to mobile intermediaries, would be able to establish and maintain contacts over longer distances. One may assume that those who sat at the nodal points of the local, country-wide, or international communication system would be the most powerful members of their respective social circles. In the following we shall investigate the forms and modes of communication reflected in Jewish and early Christian literary sources from the Roman period.
    [Show full text]