The United States and German Reunification: the Stalin Note of 1952

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The United States and German Reunification: the Stalin Note of 1952 Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1989 The nitU ed States and German Reunification: The Stalin Note of 1952 Klaus P. Grillmaier Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in History at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Grillmaier, Klaus P., "The nitU ed States and German Reunification: The tS alin Note of 1952" (1989). Masters Theses. 2415. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2415 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS REPRODUCTION CERTIFICATE TO: Graduate Degree Candidates who have written formal theses. SUBJECT: Permission to reproduce theses. The University Library is receiving a number of requests from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow theses to be copied. Please sign one of the following statements: Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that institution's library or research holdings. �� 161 IJ(j Date I respectfully request Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University not allow my thesis be reproduced because Date Author m The United States and German Reunification: The Stalin Note of 1952 (l ITLE) BY Klaus P. Grillmaier THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 1989 YEAR I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS THESIS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE GRADUATE DEGREE CITED ABOVE �� ���IC��DATE s..� \\�<\ ;j_�/%1 DATE iii Abstract This thesis discusses the American and West German reaction to the Soviet note of March 10, 1952. In this so- called Stalin Note the Soviet dictator proposed the reunification of Germany on terms of neutrality and acceptance of the Oder and Neisse rivers as the German-Polish border. By launching his proposal Stalin sought to prevent the integration of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) into the Western alliance system. The paper starts out sketching the emergence of the United States and the Soviet Union as superpowers after World War II. It also analyzes the impact the . Cold War had on Europe . After this introductory section the author discusses American-West German relations during the time between the founding of the FRG and spring 1952, when the Stalin Note was presented to the Western ambassadors in Moscow. During the first• three years of the Bonn government , American policy toward Germany gradually shifted away from the objective of controlling the defeated enemy . Instead, the Truman Administration increasingly pursued a policy of cautious cooperation in order to contain Soviet expansionism. Although this change in Washington 's course was accelerated by the outbreak of the Korean War in mid-1950, the occupation iv of Germany lasted until 1955, the year in which west Germany received sovereignty and joined the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. After 1949, it was West German Chancellor Adenauer 's foremost goal to restore full independence to the German government through close cooperation with the Western Al lies , especially the United States . Adenauer was prepared to postpone the reunification of his country for the time being. Hoping to create a strong power basis for the FRG in the West European alliance, he expected to gain the necessary strength for successful negotiations with Moscow about Germany 's unity. To a large extent Bonn 's policy harmonized with that of the Truman Administration. Prior to the creation of two German states , the Soviet Union had followed a rather aggressive course in its policy toward Germany which climaxed with the Berlin Blockade of 1948 . Being confronted with the failure of its strategy and facing a tremendous We stern armament program after the invasion of South Korea , the Kremlin changed its strategy. During the second half of 1951 and spring 1952, Moscow di spatched several initiatives for German reunification of which the Stalin Note was the most conciliatory one. The United States rej ected Moscow' s proposal of March , 1952 because Washington did not want to cancel its defense plans for Western Europe in exchange for a new power constellation on that continent which Washington considered v fragile and dangerous to American security interests . The author of this paper concludes that American opposition to the Soviet plan was the major Western obstacle with respect to sincere four-power talks on German unity in 1952. French , British and West German concurrence with America's attitude considerably facilitated this policy. The author, however , questions the thesis of some historians that Adenauer 's concurrence with Washington 's course was essential to the United States' refusal of the Stalin Note. He holds that a possible west German disagreement concerning Washington 's course would not have resulted in serious four-power talks. Adenauer 's political lever was too weak as to press successfully for a constructive Western approach to Moscow's initiative. Bonn had only the chance to threaten a suspension of further talks on the FRG's integration into the Western alliance system until the Soviet plan had been thoroughly probed--a move that would have caused severe frictions among the We stern Allies and Adenauer. Such a strategy would have jeopardized if not destroyed the basis for continued cooperation between the Western powers and the Federal Republic without resulting in Germany 's reunification. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ..................................................iii Introduction ............... ................ .. ...............1 Chapter I. American Engagement in Global Politics After World War II •••••.•...••.•.....••... .•....•••.••.••.•.•5 II. The Evolution of Closer American-German Relations and the Solidification of the Division of Germany 1949-1952 .....•...........•........... .......•...•...•11 1. U.S. Policy Toward Germany and the Impact of the Korean War •••••.• •..•••••••••••••11 2. Chancellor Adenauer's Diplomatic Struggle for West German Sovereignty •••••••.•••••••...••33 3. The Social Democratic Opposition to Adenauer' s Po licy •••...••••••• •••••••.•.••••.•43 III. Stalin 's Note of March 10 , 1952 ••••••••.••.....••.•.•.56 1. Soviet Policy Toward Germany 1949-52 •••••••••••56 2. Moscow's Proposal to Create a United and Neutralized Germany •••••••••••••••••••.••••70 IV. The American Reaction and the "Battle of Notes" ••••..•79 1. American Diplomacy ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••79 2. Reactions to the Stalin note by the American Press ...............................113 3. Adenauer ' s Maneuvers •••••.•••••.•••••..•••.•.122 4. The Nationalistic Attitude of the German Social Democrats •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••141 V. West Germany 's Road to Full Sovereignty ••••••••••••••153 VI. Conclusion .... .... ...................................161 Bibliog-raphy.... .............................. ............16 7 1 Introduction The East-West conflict that emerged during World War II rendered Germany a divided country for an inde finite time . For fourty years the Germanies were separated by an iron curtain. Still today they are integrated into military alliances directed against one another. The question whether the Stalin Note of 1952 was a sincere proposal of a united, neutral Germany or a mere diplomatic trap raised a persistent dispute among po liticians , political observers , and historians . The key to this problem, however, lies in the state and party archives in Moscow which remain closed to historical research. Some historians have pointed out that in 1952 the Western occupation powers and We st German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer missed a chance for a thorough examination of the Kremlin's proposal. These scholars hold that by rejecting negotiations with the Soviets the Allies and Adenauer also missed an opportunity for Germany's democratic reunification . • The recent mass exodus from the German Democratic Republic (GDR) and the powerful demonstrations demanding freedom and democracy in that state anew indicate the importance of the decisions made in 1952. Could all this have been avoided had the western Allies agreed to the Soviet initiative for a four- power conference in that year ? 2 This thesis focuses on the policy of the Truman Administration and the Adenauer government toward Moscow 's March 195 2 proposal. Washington and Bonn's perception of the Soviet note and their reaction to it will be the center of the discussion. It goes without saying that the United States as the Western superpower was the dominant factor in German­ American relations at this time. One might raise the question , however , whether Washington could have successfully pursued its policy of integrating one part of Germany--the Federal Repub lic of Germany (FRG)--into the western alliance system if it had been opposed by the FRG ' s government. In other words: did Chancellor Adenauer possess the lever to force the United States and its allies to deal more constructively with the question of German unity ? An introductory chapter of this
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography I. Primary Sources A. Manuscript Collections and Government Archives Foreign Affairs Oral History Program (FAOHP), Georgetown University Washington, D.C. (copies also deposited at George C. Marshall Library) Everett Bellows (February 1989) David S. Brown (March 1989) Vincent V. Checchi (July 1990) Lincoln Gordon (January 1988) John J. Grady (August 1989) William Parks (November 1988) Melbourne Spector (December 1988) Joseph Toner (October 1989) Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. W. Averell Harriman Papers George C. Marshall Library, Lexington, Virginia Dowsley Clark Collection European Recovery Plan Commemoratives Collection William C. Foster Papers George C. Marshall Papers Marshall Plan Photograph Collection Forrest Pogue Interviews (Paul Hoffman and John McCloy) Harry B. Price Interviews (conducted 1952–54) ECA and OEEC Leland Barrows Richard M. Bissell Samuel Board Harlan Cleveland H. Van B. Cleveland John O. Coppock Glenn Craig D. A. Fitzgerald William C. Foster Theodore Geiger Lincoln Gordon W. Averell Harriman Carroll Hinman Paul Hoffman E. N. Holmgren John Lindeman Shaw Livermore Robert Marjolin Orbun V. Powell MacDonald Salter Melbourne Spector Harold Stein Donald C. Stone Allan Swim Samuel Van Hyning Greece (Americans) Michael H. B. Adler Leland Barrows Dowsley Clark John O. Coppock Helene Granby Joseph F. Heath Robert Hirschberg Paul A. Jenkins Brice M. Mace Lawrence B. Myers Walter E. Packard Paul R. Porter 163 Bibliography Greece (Americans—continued) Alan D. Strachan Edward A. Tenenbaum John O. Walker Greece (Greeks) Costa Hadjiagyras Constantin D. Tsatsos Italy (Americans) Vincent M. Barnett William E. Corfitzen Henry J. Costanzo Bartlett Harvey Thomas A. Lane Dominic J. Marcello Walter C. McAdoo Guido Nadzo Chauncey Parker Donald Simmons James Toughill Italy (Italians) Giovanni Malagodi Donato Menichella Ernesto Rossi Turkey (Americans) Clifton H.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Master's Theses (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University Recommended Citation Labinski, Nicholas, "Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin" (2011). Master's Theses (2009 -). Paper 104. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/104 EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN by Nicholas Labinski A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee, Wisconsin August 2011 ABSTRACT EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN Nicholas Labinski Marquette University, 2011 This paper examines John F. Kennedy’s rhetoric concerning the Berlin Crisis (1961-1963). Three major speeches are analyzed: Kennedy’s Radio and Television Report to the American People on the Berlin Crisis , the Address at Rudolph Wilde Platz and the Address at the Free University. The study interrogates the rhetorical strategies implemented by Kennedy in confronting Khrushchev over the explosive situation in Berlin. The paper attempts to answer the following research questions: What is the historical context that helped frame the rhetorical situation Kennedy faced? What rhetorical strategies and tactics did Kennedy employ in these speeches? How might Kennedy's speeches extend our understanding of presidential public address? What is the impact of Kennedy's speeches on U.S. German relations and the development of U.S. and German Policy? What implications might these speeches have for the study and execution of presidential power and international diplomacy? Using a historical-rhetorical methodology that incorporates the historical circumstances surrounding the crisis into the analysis, this examination of Kennedy’s rhetoric reveals his evolution concerning Berlin and his Cold War strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Our History. Germany Since 1945
    Our History. Germany since 1945 Guide through the exkhibition k k A Cordial Welcome to the Museum of Contemporary History of the Federal Republic p Our History. of Germany Germany since 1945 We invite you to tour the Permanent Exhibition – “Our History. Germany since 1945”. Spread over 4,000-plus square metres, it is a lively and up-to-date panorama of contemporary German history, with individual perspectives set in an inkternational context. It showcases original artefacts. There are many inter- active stations plus interviews with contemporary witnesses to escort you on your way from the end of the Second World War to the present. 1945 – 1949 Burden of the Past and Germany’s Division World War II, unleashed by Germany, ends with the surrender of the German armed forces on 8 May 1945. What remains is largely a traumatized and devastated country. The Allies occupy Germany and divide it into four zones. Many people are dead or missing; families are torn apart. The enormity of the Nazi crimes raises questions about accountability: Who knew, who shared the blame? But widespread public discussion doesn’t get started in Germany until the 1960s. The ravages of war and the country’s division have devastated the economy. Rationing is supposed to assure the distribution of basic supplies, but the black market is booming. In 1948 the deutschmark is introduced in the western zones, laying the groundwork for an economic upturn. The occupied zones grow apart politically and economically: In the west is born the Federal Republic of Germany, a parliamen - tary democracy; in the east the GDR, a coercive communist state modelled on the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • More Than a Dream? Obama's Vision of A
    LÄNDERBERICHT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. USA OLIVER STUENKEL More than a dream? Juni 2009 Obama’s vision of a nuclear arms-free world www.kas.de www.kas.de/usa “Our age has stolen the fire from the plement his strategy? Most importantly, will Gods. Can we confine it to peaceful means it work? before it consumes us?” Henry Kissinger In fact, Mr. Obama's plan is not only timely, In Prague on April 5th, Barack Obama an- but also increasingly persuasive for main- nounced a drastic change in U.S. nuclear stream thinkers. Whether it will work, how- policy. It would be his goal to eliminate all ever, is another matter entirely. nuclear weapons, calling it “America’s moral responsibility” to eventually “get to zero”. OBAMA’S NUCLEAR PROBLEM His initiative received mixed reactions from President Obama's vision of a world without analysts around the world. On the one nuclear arms is not as revolutionary as it hand, optimists praised his efforts and may seem. Days after the first nuclear de- hailed Obama’s vision as a new beginning. vices were tested in New Mexico in 1945, On the other hand, pessimists called his several members of the Manhattan Project plan inadequate for a world as dangerous as formulated their desire to put the nuclear ever. genie back in the bottle. Every American President since Dwight Eisenhower has pro- The timing could not have been worse. Only claimed the objective of a world without nu- hours before the speech, North Korea’s Kim clear weapons. In 1986, Ronald Reagan and Jong Il had provided critics with ammunition Mikhail Gorbachev discussed eliminating nu- by launching a nuclear capable missile that clear weapons altogether during a meeting flew 3200 km, including over Japanese ter- in Reykjavik, causing outrage among ritory, before falling into the Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Kennedy at the Line in the Sand', from Süddeutsche Zeitung
    ‘Kennedy at the line in the sand’, from Süddeutsche Zeitung Caption: On 27 June 1963, commenting on the visit of US President, John F. Kennedy, to West Berlin the previous day, the German daily newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung considers the German question and the division of Berlin. Source: Süddeutsche Zeitung. Münchner Neueste Nachrichten aus Politik, Kultur, Wirtschaft und Sport. Hrsg. Dürrmeier, Hans ; Herausgeber Proebst, Hermann. 27.06.1963, Nr. 153; 19. Jg. München: Süddeutscher Verlag. "Kennedy am Kreidestrich", auteur:Schuster, Hans , p. 1; 2. Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/kennedy_at_the_line_in_the_sand_from_suddeutsche_zeitu ng-en-2f8118c6-c6fe-4950-8531-00285d57dcb8.html Last updated: 06/07/2016 1/3 Kennedy at the line in the sand By Hans Schuster Millions of eyewitnesses from far and near will never forget the image: the President of the United States at the Wall which has become a symbol of sorrow throughout the world — opposite him the Brandenburg Gate, draped with red flags by nervous guards. The inherent qualities of the two worlds which abut one another here in the heart of Germany could not be demonstrated more clearly. On one side: confidence — newly won after many vicissitudes — in the moral and ultimately also political superiority of freedom; on the other: fear of the ungovernable freedom virus which, amongst other things, also has the ability to pass unchecked through prohibited zones, walls and barriers.
    [Show full text]
  • GERMAN LANGUAGE GUIDE 1. KONRAD ADENAUER A. Dwight D
    GERMAN LANGUAGE GUIDE 1. KONRAD ADENAUER A. Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Papers as President (Ann Whitman File), International Series, Boxes 14-16 Consists of some 30 file folders. Includes social and official correspondence between Eisenhower and Adenauer, background documentation surrounding Adenauer’s visit to the United States in 1960, and memos discussing issues of joint U.S.-FRG concern. Some of Adenauer’s letters are in German with State Department translations provided. The student can report to the class on German “diplomatic language” found in Adenauer’s letters and not normally learned in the classroom and can also describe important issues facing the United States and Federal Republic of Germany during this period. B. Papers of John Foster Dulles, General Correspondence and Memoranda Series Box 1, File Folder: “Memos of Conversations General A Through D (1).” Contains memoranda of Secretary Dulles’ conversations with Adenauer on various European matters. Box 2, File Folder: “Strictly Confidential - A-B (1).” This file includes letters exchanged between Adenauer and Dulles, including letters in German plus translations. These cover relations with the Soviet Union, Germany, and other matters and reflect the close relationship between Secretary Dulles and Chancellor Adenauer. C. Papers of Eleanor Lansing Dulles, Box 13, File Folders: “Adenauer Funeral (1)-(3).” These three folders include material on the state funeral for German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, which Ms. Dulles attended. The folders contain some material in German, various schedules and itineraries of President Lyndon Johnson who attended, and newspaper clippings of the event. The student can report on religious terminology found in the funeral program and not normally studied in the classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Findbuch Als
    STAATSARCHIV BREMEN Bestand 7,97 Kaisen, Helene und Wilhelm Findbuch bearbeitet von Eva Determann und Hartmut Müller Bremen 2001/2015 - II - Hinweise für die Benutzung: Zum Bestellen und Zitieren von Akten sind die Signaturen zu verwenden, die sich aus der Teilbestandsnummer und – durch einen Bindestrich angehängt – der laufenden Nummer der Akte zusammensetzen. Beispiel: 7,97/5 – 111 Die Benutzung richtet sich nach den Bestimmungen des Bremischen Archivgesetzes. Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort II 1. Wilhelm Kaisen 1 1.1. Persönliche Unterlagen 1 1.1.1. Personenstand und Biographisches 1 1.1.2. Rechnungsunterlagen 3 1.2. Unterlagen aus Politik und gesellschaftlicher Tätigkeit 4 1.2.1. Senat, Bürgerschaft, Land Bremen, Tätigkeit als Präsident des Senats 4 1.2.2. Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands 11 1.2.3. Veröffentlichungen, Reden, Presse- und Rundfunkbeiträge 13 1.2.4. Reisen 14 1.2.5. Auszeichnungen, Ehrungen 15 1.3. Korrespondenz 16 1.3.1. Briefe von Wilhelm Kaisen an Helene Kaisen 16 1.3.2. Briefe von Helene Kaisen an Wilhelm Kaisen 17 1.3.3. Briefe an/von Familie 17 1.3.4. Briefe an Wilhelm und Helene Kaisen, privat 18 1.3.5. Briefwechsel mit Wilhelm Kaisen (Korrespondenzmappen) 19 1.3.6. Glückwünsche 23 1.4. Unterlagen zur Person 24 1.5. Verschiedenes 25 1.6. Fotos und Fotoalben 26 2. Helene Kaisen 45 2.1. Persönliche Unterlagen 45 2.2. Unterlagen aus politischer und gesellschaftlicher Tätigkeit 46 2.3. Nachbarschaftshaus Ohlenhof 48 2.4. Korrespondenz 53 2.5. Unterlagen zur Person 54 2.6. Fotoalben 55 3. Weitere Personen 55 3.1. Hans Henrik Kaisen 55 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund Spevack German Drafts for a Postwar Federal Constitution Versus Allied Decisions of the London Six-Power Conference
    The American Impact on Western Europe: Americanization and Westernization in Transatlantic Perspective Conference at the German Historical Institute Washington, D.C., March 25–27, 1999 Edmund Spevack German Drafts for a Postwar Federal Constitution versus Allied Decisions of the London Six-Power Conference www.ghi-dc.org/conpotweb/westernpapers/spevack.pdf ©Edmund Spevack German Drafts for a Postwar Federal Constitution versus Allied Decisions of the London Six-Power Conference Edmund Spevack American opinion polls conducted in Germany at the time support the conclusion that in 1945-1949 most ordinary Germans were preoccupied with issues of basic material and physical survival and showed a great deal of indifference to the constitutional fate of Germany.1 However, many Germans were not as apathetic as that. Soon after his arrival in Germany, Clay's advisor James K. Pollock began to believe that "every leading German has a constitution in his pocket." 2 And indeed, the number of constitutional drafts formulated in the resistance movement, in exile, in the individual German Länder , in the recently reestablished political parties, as well by private citizens, was impressive. It goes almost without saying that the influence of leading Nazi constitutional theorists was eradicated in the wake of the Allied occupation of Germany. In contrast, many constitutional proposals drawn up by Germans in the resistance or in exile during the war years were in direct opposition to Hitler's Germany. Indeed, many of them were democratic and some of them were based on the Weimar system or on western models. However, a large number had almost nothing in common with the ideological sources of the Basic Law, calling for forms of government such as theocracy, monarchy, feudalism, or communism.
    [Show full text]
  • Gewollt Und Durchgesetzt Beiträge Zur Geschichte Des Parlamentarismus Und Der Parteien in Bremen Band 1
    Gewollt und durchgesetzt Beiträge zur Geschichte des Parlamentarismus und der Parteien in Bremen Band 1 Herausgeber: Frank Boldt Landeszentrale tür politische Bildung Bremen Redaktion: Reinhard Uhde Gewollt und durchgesetzt Die SPD-Bürgerschaftsfraktion des Landes Bremen von der Jahrhundertwende bis zur Gegenwart Herausgegeben von Klaus Wedemeier. Mit einem Geleitwort von Willy Brandt und Beiträgen von Horst Adamietz, Uwe Beckmeyer, Frank Boldt, Dieter Klink, Reinhold Roth, Michael Scherer, Karl-Ludwig Sommer und Reinhard Uhde. Leske + Budrich, Opladen 1983 Gewollt und durchgesetzt: d. SPD-Bürgerschafts• fraktion d. Landes Bremen von d. Jahrhundertwende bis zur Gegenwart/hrsg. von Klaus Wedemeier. Mit e. Geleitwort von Willy Brandt u. Beitr. von Horst Adamietz ... - Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 1983. (Beiträge zur Geschichte des Parlamentarismus und der Parteien in Bremen; Bd. 1) NE: Wedemeier, Klaus (Hrsg.l: Adamietz, Horst (Mitverf.l; Bremen/Bürgerschaft/ Fraktion der SPD; GT 63; 16 © 1983 by Leske Verlag + Budrich GmbH, Leverkusen Satz: Petra Käpnick Montage: Christel Herminghaus ISBN 978-3-8100-0447-5 ISBN 978-3-322-92612-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-322-92612-8 ZUM GELEIT Von Willy Brandt, Vorsitzender der SPD "Nach Übersicht dieser ganzen Verhältnisse hat man allen Grund, in der Auswahl der Bürgerschaftsvertreter vorsichtig zu sein. Die bürgerlichen Vertreter haben ihre Versprechungen nicht eingehalten; sie haben nicht den Mut gezeigt, einzutreten für die wahren Rechte des Volkes." Mit dieser Anklage leitete der Handwerker Friedrich Ebert den Wahl kampf des Jahres 1896 ein. Und er fuhr fort: "Das zu erreichen, ist es notwendig, Leute zu wählen, die sei bst gelitten haben, aus eigener Erfahrung die Noth des Volkes kennen und die ferner durch ihre Verpflichtung auf ein festes Einkommen die Garantie bieten, daß sie für die entrechteten Klas­ sen, für das Proletariat eintreten.
    [Show full text]
  • Because We Need Them…
    BECAUSE WE NEED THEM… German-Dutch relations after the occupation: economic inevitability and political acceptance, 1945-1957 Martijn Lak BECAUSE WE NEED THEM… German-Dutch relations after the occupation: economic inevitability and political acceptance, 1945-1957 Omdat we ze nodig hebben… Duits-Nederlandse betrekkingen na de bezetting: economische onvermijdelijkheid en politieke acceptatie, 1945- 1957 PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van de rector magnificus Prof.dr. H.G. Schmidt en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties. De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op donderdag 8 december 2011 om 09.30 uur door Martijn Lak geboren te Amersfoort Promotiecommissie: Promotor: Prof.dr. H.A.M. Klemann Overige leden: Prof.dr. A. de Jong Prof.dr. F. Wielenga Prof.dr. C.W.A.M. van Paridon Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 1 Introduction, historiography and composition of the study ................................ 8 1.1 International relations theory ......................................................................................... 8 1.2 Dutch-German relations 1945-1957: historiography .................................................... 16 1.3 Central research question and subquestions............................................................... 21 1.4 Composition of the study .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kurt Georg Kiesinger – Ein Freund Frankreichs?
    Böhlau, Fr. Fichtner, Historisch-Politische-Mitteilungen, 1. AK, MS Kurt Georg Kiesinger – Ein Freund Frankreichs? Von Ansbert Baumann Als Kurt Georg Kiesinger am 1. Dezember 1966 vom Deutschen Bundestag zum dritten Kanzler der Bundesrepublik Deutschland gewählt wurde, fand die- se Wahl in Frankreich ein positives Echo.1 Der langjährige französische Bot- schafter in Bonn, François Seydoux, meinte rückblickend, dass »Kurt Georg Kiesingers Sieg ... einen französischen Unterton«2 gehabt habe, und auch der damalige deutsche Botschafter in Paris, Manfred Klaiber, stellte später fest, für ihn sei Kiesingers »Amtsantritt ein ganz großes Aufatmen« gewesen.3 In der Tat hatte der neue Bundeskanzler unmittelbar vor seiner Wahl mehrfach deutlich gemacht, dass er der Frankreichpolitik von Bundeskanzler Ludwig Erhard und Außenminister Gerhard Schröder reserviert gegenüberstehe und hier einen anderen Weg ansteuern wolle.4 Folgerichtig sprach er in seiner Re- gierungserklärung vom 13. Dezember 1966, der Entwicklung des deutsch- französischen Verhältnisses eine »entscheidende Rolle für die Zukunft Euro- pas«5 zu. Die Große Koalition erreichte in den knapp drei Jahren ihrer Existenz tat- sächlich eine deutliche Verbesserung des Klimas zwischen Deutschland und Frankreich, woran nicht zuletzt das gute persönliche Verhältnis zwischen Kie- singer und de Gaulle entscheidenden Anteil hatte – so stellte der französische Staatspräsident nach der ersten Begegnung mit dem neuen Bundeskanzler gegenüber Botschafter Klaiber fest: »Enfin un homme d’État allemand, avec lequel on peut parler comme avec Adenauer«6. Obwohl die Kontakte zu Frankreich auch unter Kiesingers Kanzlerschaft nicht immer ungetrübt blie- 1 Sogar der gegenüber Kiesinger durchaus kritische Deutschland-Korrespondent der Zei- tung Le Monde stellte fest: »les relations avec la France recevront une impulsion éner- gique« (Roland DELCOUR, »M.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Industrial Issues in France's Approach to the German
    Economic and Industrial Issues in France’s Approach to the German Question in the Post-War Period Françoise Berger To cite this version: Françoise Berger. Economic and Industrial Issues in France’s Approach to the German Question in the Post-War Period. Frédéric Bozo, Christian Wenkel. France and the German Question, 1945-1990, Berghahn, 2019, 978-1-78920-226-7. halshs-02921196 HAL Id: halshs-02921196 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02921196 Submitted on 2 Sep 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. in F. Bozo et allii, France and the German Question, 1945-1990, Berghahn (USA), 2019, p. 35-51. CHAPTER 2 ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL ISSUES IN FRANCE’S APPROACH TO THE GERMAN QUESTION IN THE POSTWAR PERIOD FRANÇOISE BERGER Evaluating French policies toward Germany during the Allied occupation period after the war has long been difficult because of both countries’ sensitivity toward economic and industrial issues. These aspects were seldom studied apart from their negative consequences in the French Zone of Occupation (ZFO). This contribution aims to review the existing research and knowledge on France’s postwar economic policies toward Germany from the wartime Free France projects up to 1955.1 It will highlight the importance of economic issues, which were far from being secondary for France.
    [Show full text]