John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Master's Theses (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University Recommended Citation Labinski, Nicholas, "Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin" (2011). Master's Theses (2009 -). Paper 104. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/104 EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN by Nicholas Labinski A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee, Wisconsin August 2011 ABSTRACT EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN Nicholas Labinski Marquette University, 2011 This paper examines John F. Kennedy’s rhetoric concerning the Berlin Crisis (1961-1963). Three major speeches are analyzed: Kennedy’s Radio and Television Report to the American People on the Berlin Crisis , the Address at Rudolph Wilde Platz and the Address at the Free University. The study interrogates the rhetorical strategies implemented by Kennedy in confronting Khrushchev over the explosive situation in Berlin. The paper attempts to answer the following research questions: What is the historical context that helped frame the rhetorical situation Kennedy faced? What rhetorical strategies and tactics did Kennedy employ in these speeches? How might Kennedy's speeches extend our understanding of presidential public address? What is the impact of Kennedy's speeches on U.S. German relations and the development of U.S. and German Policy? What implications might these speeches have for the study and execution of presidential power and international diplomacy? Using a historical-rhetorical methodology that incorporates the historical circumstances surrounding the crisis into the analysis, this examination of Kennedy’s rhetoric reveals his evolution concerning Berlin and his Cold War strategy. It is argued that Kennedy began with a military strategy, flexible response, which was established in his Radio and Television Report in July 1961 and over the next two years this strategy evolved into a strategy of peace embodied in a policy of détente. Kennedy moved away from Eisenhower’s Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) strategy and the implied either-or choice of holocaust or humiliation toward a more flexible policy that gave the president many more options. By including a historical account of U.S.-German relations from World War II to Kennedy’s ascension in 1961 to his untimely death in 1963, this study also connects Kennedy’s rhetoric to important developments in U.S.-German relations and highlight’s the president’s crucial role in shaping this process. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Nicholas Labinski In no particular order, I would like to thank my mother, my father and my sister. I would like to Dr. Goldzwig, Dr. Ugland and Dr. Feldner for their support and guidance. I would like to thank God for providing me with the strength, wisdom and guidance on this project. And, a special thanks to Marquette University and the seven wonderful years of being a student and educator here. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………...……...i CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION Background and Previous Studies….……………………………….…..1 Rationale and Purpose…………………………………………………...6 Rhetorical Theory………………………………………………………..8 Rhetorical Criticism……………………………………………………...9 Rhetoric & History……………………………………………………..11 Rhetorical History………………………………………………………12 II. HISTORICAL CONTEXT 1945-50: Postwar Settlement: A Cold Peace?..………………….........15 1951-58: Western Growth, Eastern Unrest………………...................55 1958-61: Rising Tensions: An Ultimatum at the Heart of Europe......64 John F. Kennedy: A Presidential Worldview ..…………...………......66 The Berlin Issue…………………………...............................................72 The Vienna Conference, 1961 ……………………………....................81 Lead Up to the July 25, 1961 Address..………..……............................91 III. RHETORICAL ANALYSIS Kennedy’s Radio and TV Address to the American People…..……..98 Historical Constraints: Potsdam, Yalta and Basis for Western Presence in Berlin…….......…………………………………………….99 The Middle Ground: Flexible Response……………………………..104 Personal Influences………………………………………………...….109 iii Reaction: Words and the Berlin Wall…………………......................117 Why July 25, 1961 Matters…………………………………………...128 The Fallout: The Berlin Wall ………………………………...............128 September 1961-October 1962: ‘We Did Not Send Him to See the Opera in East Berlin’...……………………………………………......139 Cuban Missile Crisis: ‘I Think the Other Guy Blinked’ …………...148 European Split: Gaullists vs. Atlanticists …………….…………......159 Kennedy’s European Trip …………….…………...............................162 Kennedy in Germany …………….………….......................................165 Analysis of Kennedy’s Remarks at Rudolph Wilde Platz, Berlin The Berlin Effect: A City Embraces a President ……………...........171 Kennedy on the Attack: Accusations of Failure …………….………178 Reunification: The Many Sides of Kennedy…....................................181 Kennedy Goes Roman: Civis Romanus Sum.…………….…………184 Identificational Appeals: Rudolph Wilde Platz …………….………186 Why Rudolph Wilde Platz Matters…………………………………..191 Free University: Rudolph Wilde Platz’s Counterbalance ………….193 The Challenge Extended: Truth, Justice and Liberty…....................194 Accusations and History: Kennedy’s Other Strategy……………….199 Détente: The Path Forward …………….…………............................204 Community Building: A Dual Audience…………………...………...205 The Rise of Brandt and the Dawn of Ostpolitik……..........................210 Why Free University Matters………………………………………...214 iv IV. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Epilogue: Kennedy’s Legacy in Germany to Ostpolitik in the 1970s……………………………………………………………………216 Implications and Conclusions………...................................................228 Bibliography …………….………….....................................................238 1 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION The idea of presidential rhetoric as a scholarly pursuit has evolved over the years, and is now seen as an interdisciplinary field with many different contributors and as a force in the academic world (Medhurst, 2008). Presidential rhetorical articles have increased in two key journals, Presidential Studies Quarterly and Rhetoric & Public Affairs . Since 2005, Presidential Studies Quarterly has published 19 articles or reviews of books on presidential rhetoric. Rhetoric & Public Affairs has published approximately 40 articles concerning presidential rhetoric. The variety of articles being published in both journals demonstrates an increasing interest among scholars in presidential rhetoric. While these studies are filling in the scholarly knowledge Windt (1986) recognized there are still many topics and presidents that have not been examined by rhetorical scholars. Background and Previous Studies Existing scholarship on Kennedy addresses various aspects of his foreign policy addresses, but no existing rhetorical scholarship has focused on his three major speeches on U.S.-German relations and their role in U.S. policy toward Germany. Berlin was central to Kennedy’s foreign policy, and while scholars have focused on either his Report to the American People on the Berlin Crisis or his address at Rudolph Wilde Platz, no rhetorical scholar has analyzed both speeches together. In addition, there has been no scholarly rhetorical study of Kennedy’s address at the Free University of Berlin, which provided Willy Brandt with the impetus to implement his Ostpolitik policy with East Berlin. The lion’s share of literature on Kennedy and the Berlin Crisis comes in the form of historical research. Although much of this research is richly detailed and provides the context for the Berlin Crisis, it does not apply the techniques of rhetorical analysis. 2 Further, historians most often refer to the important lines and phrases from Kennedy’s speeches and note the historical consequences of Kennedy’s actions on the Cold War landscape. Even Kennedy’s speech writer, Theodore Sorensen (1965), provides an exclusive look inside the Kennedy administration, but his analysis of Kennedy is more historical than rhetorical. Theodore Windt Jr.’s (2003) study on Kennedy’s speech writing process used all three German speeches as examples of the multifaceted atmosphere in which Kennedy’s speeches were drafted, but Windt fails to critique any German address in depth. Rather, Windt examines the collaboration between Sorensen and Kennedy, and the evolution of Kennedy’s rhetorical style over his political career. Other rhetorical studies include Goldzwig and Dionisopoulos (1995b), Goldzwig and Bostdorff (1994), and Meagher (1997) focus on Kennedy’s personal characteristics or the pragmatic idealism present in his foreign policy speeches. These studies draw upon Kennedy’s background and presidential campaign to show the formation and transformation of Kennedy’s thought. These studies are essential to understanding Kennedy’s actions and rhetoric in Berlin. Where Goldzwig and Dionisopoulos (1995a) examine Kennedy’s Report to the Nation on Berlin, they give no substantial attention to the other two speeches in the context of the German question. In fact, Goldzwig and Dionisopoulos’ (1995b.) previous study demonstrated the full dimensions of Kennedy’s attempts at strategic balancing of idealism and pragmatism. My study will undertake this task by focusing on the German speeches. Kennedy’s Berlin
Recommended publications
  • US Army Was Already Upset About Its Losses from Deep Personnel and White House Photo Via National Archives Budget Cuts When Gen
    National Park Service photo by Abbie Rowe By John T. Correll US Army was already upset about its losses from deep personnel and White House photo via National Archives budget cuts when Gen. Maxwell D. Taylor arrived as the new Chief of Defense Technical Information Center photo Staff in June 1955. Army strength was down by almost a third since the Korean War and the Army share of the budget was dropping steadily. These reductions were the result of the “New Look” defense program, introduced in 1953 by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, and the “Massive Retaliation” strategy that went with it. New Look was focused on the threat of Soviet military power, putting greater reliance on strategic airpower and nuclear weapons and less emphasis on the kind of wars the Army fought. US planning was based on the standard of general war; the limited conflict in Korea was regarded as an aberration. If for some reason another small or limited war had to be fought, the US armed forces, organized and equipped for general war, would handle it as a “lesser included contingency.” New Look—so called because Eisenhower had ordered a “new fresh survey of our military capabilities”—was driven by the belief that adequate security was possible at lower cost, especially if general purpose forces overseas were thinned out. Another factor was the recognition that NATO could not match the con- ventional forces of the Soviet Union, which had 175 divisions—30 of them in Europe—and 6,000 aircraft based forward. So in 1952, the US and its allies had adopted a strategy centered on a nuclear response to attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents of Contemporary Art: TIME Edited by Amelia Groom, the Introduction Gives an Overview of Selected Writings Addressing Time in Relation to Art
    “It is important to realize that the appointment that is in question in contemporariness does not simply take place in chronological time; it is something that, working within chronological time, urges, presses and transforms it. And this urgency is the untimeliness, the anachronism that permits us to grasp our time in the form of a ‘too soon’ that is also a ‘too late’; of an ‘already’ that is also a ‘not yet.’ Moreover, it allows us to recognize in the obscurity of the present the light that, without ever being able to reach us, is perpetually voyaging towards us.” - Giorgio Agamben 2009 What is the Contemporary? FORWARD ELAINE THAP Time is of the essence. Actions speak louder than words. The throughline of the following artists is that they all have an immediacy and desire to express and challenge the flaws of the Present. In 2008, all over the world were uprisings that questions government and Capitalist infrastructure. Milan Kohout attempted to sell nooses for homeowners and buyers in front of the Bank of America headquarters in Boston. Ernesto Pujol collaborated and socially choreographed artists in Tel Aviv protesting the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. Indonesian artist, Arahmaiani toured the world to share “HIS Story,” performances creating problematic imagery ending to ultimately writing on her body to shine a spotlight on the effects of patriarchy and the submission of women. All of these artists confront terrorism from all parts of the world and choose live action to reproduce memory and healing. Social responsibility is to understand an action, account for the reaction, and to place oneself in the bigger picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Pm Khalid-08.04.2019 Pressematerial
    FKP Scorpio Konzertproduktionen GmbH Große Elbstr. 277 a ∙ 22767 Hamburg Tel. (040) 853 88 888 ∙ www.fkpscorpio.com PRESSEMITTEILUNG 08.04.2019 FKP Scorpio und Melt! Booking in Kooperation mit AEG präsentieren: Khalid im Herbst mit seinem zweiten Album „Free Spirit“ auf Tour in Deutschland! Live in Hamburg, Frankfurt, Oberhausen und München! Im Rahmen seiner Free-Spirit-World-Tour kündigte der mehrfach mit Platin ausgezeichnete R&B Sänger Khalid vier Shows in Deutschland an. Die Ankündigung der Free- Spirit-World-Tour folgte auf die Veröffentlichung seines mit Spannung erwarteten neuen Albums „Free Spirit“. Khalids Debütalbum „American Teen“ (2017) kletterte bis auf Platz vier der Billboard Charts, erreichte Doppelplatin und wurde für fünf (!) Grammys nominiert – nun veröffentlicht US-Shootingstar Khalid sein zweites Album „Free Spirit“. Mit seinem neuen Album kommt Khalid im September und Oktober für insgesamt vier Headline- Shows nach Deutschland. Begleitet wird Khalid von Mabel und Raye, die als Support Acts für die Shows in Hamburg, Frankfurt, Oberhausen und München bestätigt sind. Erst im Oktober vergangenen Jahres hatte Khalid mit „Suncity“ eine Sieben-Track-EP vorgelegt, die u.a. die beiden mit Gold ausgezeichneten US-Hitsingles „Better“ und „Saturday Nights“ hervorbrachte. Neben fünf Grammy-Nominierungen und einem US- Doppelplatin-Top-5-Album stehen bereits ein halbes Dutzend internationaler Hits und Kollabos (u.a. „Rollin“ mit Calvin Harris, „1-800-273-8255” mit Logic und Alessia Cara, „Lovely” mit Billie Eilish, „Youth” mit Shawn Mendes) sowie ausverkaufte Konzerte auf der ganzen Welt zu Buche. Präsentiert werden die Konzerte von MTV und Digster Pop. KHALID – FREE SPIRIT TOUR Special Guests: MABEL & RAYE 09.09.2019 Hamburg - Barclaycard Arena 28.09.2019 Frankfurt - Jahrhunderthalle 02.10.2019 Oberhausen - König-Pilsner-Arena 09.10.2019 München - Zenith FKP Scorpio Konzertproduktionen GmbH Große Elbstr.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Skrifter Utgivna Av Statsvetenskapliga Föreningen I Uppsala 194
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Skrifter utgivna av Statsvetenskapliga föreningen i Uppsala 194 Jessica Giandomenico Transformative Power Challenged EU Membership Conditionality in the Western Balkans Revisited Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Brusewitzsalen, Gamla Torget 6, Uppsala, Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 10:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor David Phinnemore. Abstract Giandomenico, J. 2015. Transformative Power Challenged. EU Membership Conditionality in the Western Balkans Revisited. Skrifter utgivna av Statsvetenskapliga föreningen i Uppsala 194. 237 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-9403-2. The EU is assumed to have a strong top-down transformative power over the states applying for membership. But despite intensive research on the EU membership conditionality, the transformative power of the EU in itself has been left curiously understudied. This thesis seeks to change that, and suggests a model based on relational power to analyse and understand how the transformative power is seemingly weaker in the Western Balkans than in Central and Eastern Europe. This thesis shows that the transformative power of the EU is not static but changes over time, based on the relationship between the EU and the applicant states, rather than on power resources. This relationship is affected by a number of factors derived from both the EU itself and on factors in the applicant states. As the relationship changes over time, countries and even issues, the transformative power changes with it. The EU is caught in a path dependent like pattern, defined by both previous commitments and the built up foreign policy role as a normative power, and on the nature of the decision making procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress Hall Hotel: an Historic Structure Report
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1991 Congress Hall Hotel: An Historic Structure Report Michael Calafati University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Calafati, Michael, "Congress Hall Hotel: An Historic Structure Report" (1991). Theses (Historic Preservation). 313. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/313 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Calafati, Michael (1991). Congress Hall Hotel: An Historic Structure Report. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/313 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Congress Hall Hotel: An Historic Structure Report Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Calafati, Michael (1991). Congress Hall Hotel: An Historic Structure Report. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/313 st^^» V >;>«.>>•/' ^^Bi^i', i m. UNIVERSlTYy^^ PENNSYLVANIA. UBKARIES CONGRESS HALL HOTEL: AN HISTORIC
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years Ago This May, John F. Kennedy Molded Cold War Fears Into a Collective Resolve to Achieve the Almost Unthinkable: Land American Astronauts on the Moon
    SHOOTING FOR THE MOON Fifty years ago this May, John F. Kennedy molded Cold War fears into a collective resolve to achieve the almost unthinkable: land American astronauts on the moon. In a new book, Professor Emeritus John Logsdon mines the details behind the president’s epochal decision. .ORG S GE A IM NASA Y OF S NASA/COURTE SHOOTING FOR THE MOON Fifty years ago this May, John F. Kennedy molded Cold War fears into a collective resolve to achieve the almost unthinkable: land American astronauts on the moon. In a new book, Professor Emeritus John Logsdon mines the details behind the president’s epochal decision. BY JOHN M. LOGSDON President John F. Kennedy, addressing a joint session of Congress on May 25, 1961, had called for “a great new American enterprise.” n the middle of a July night in 1969, standing The rest, of course, is history: The Eagle landed. Before a TV outside a faceless building along Florida’s eastern audience of half a billion people, Neil Armstrong took “one giant coast, three men in bright white spacesuits strolled leap for mankind,” and Buzz Aldrin emerged soon after, describing by, a few feet from me—on their way to the moon. the moonscape before him as “magnificent desolation.” They climbed into their spacecraft, atop a But the landing at Tranquility Base was not the whole story massive Saturn V rocket, and, a few hours later, of Project Apollo. I with a powerful blast, went roaring into space, the It was the story behind the story that had placed me at weight on their shoulders far more than could be measured Kennedy Space Center that July day.
    [Show full text]
  • CIA Files Relating to Heinz Felfe, SS Officer and KGB Spy
    CIA Files Relating to Heinz Felfe, SS officer and KGB Spy Norman J. W. Goda Ohio University Heinz Felfe was an officer in Hitler’s SS who after World War II became a KGB penetration agent, infiltrating West German intelligence for an entire decade. He was arrested by the West German authorities in 1961 and tried in 1963 whereupon the broad outlines of his case became public knowledge. Years after his 1969 release to East Germany (in exchange for three West German spies) Felfe also wrote memoirs and in the 1980s, CIA officers involved with the case granted interviews to author Mary Ellen Reese.1 In accordance with the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act the CIA has released significant formerly classified material on Felfe, including a massive “Name File” consisting of 1,900 pages; a CIA Damage Assessment of the Felfe case completed in 1963; and a 1969 study of Felfe as an example of a successful KGB penetration agent.2 These files represent the first release of official documents concerning the Felfe case, forty-five years after his arrest. The materials are of great historical significance and add detail to the Felfe case in the following ways: • They show in more detail than ever before how Soviet and Western intelligence alike used former Nazi SS officers during the Cold War years. 1 Heinz Felfe, Im Dienst des Gegners: 10 Jahre Moskaus Mann im BND (Hamburg: Rasch & Röhring, 1986); Mary Ellen Reese, General Reinhard Gehlen: The CIA Connection (Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1990), pp. 143-71. 2 Name File Felfe, Heinz, 4 vols., National Archives and Records Administration [NARA], Record Group [RG] 263 (Records of the Central Intelligence Agency), CIA Name Files, Second Release, Boxes 22-23; “Felfe, Heinz: Damage Assessment, NARA, RG 263, CIA Subject Files, Second Release, Box 1; “KGB Exploitation of Heinz Felfe: Successful KGB Penetration of a Western Intelligence Service,” March 1969, NARA, RG 263, CIA Subject Files, Second Release, Box 1.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BERLIN-KOREA PARALLEL: BERLIN and AMERICAN NATIONAL SECURITY in LIGHT of the KOREAN WAR Author(S): DAVID G
    THE BERLIN-KOREA PARALLEL: BERLIN AND AMERICAN NATIONAL SECURITY IN LIGHT OF THE KOREAN WAR Author(s): DAVID G. COLEMAN Reviewed work(s): Source: Australasian Journal of American Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1 (July, 1999), pp. 19-41 Published by: Australia and New Zealand American Studies Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41018739 . Accessed: 18/09/2012 14:16 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Australia and New Zealand American Studies Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Australasian Journal of American Studies. http://www.jstor.org AUSTRALASIAN JOURNALOF AMERICAN STUDIES 19 THE BERLIN-KOREA PARALLEL: BERLIN AND AMERICAN NATIONAL SECURITY IN LIGHT OF THE KOREAN WAR DAVID G. COLEMAN The Korean War had a profoundimpact on the ways in which American policymakersperceived the Cold War.Nowhere was thismore fact evident than in the case of Berlin. Despite the geographicalseparation between the two countries,policymakers became concernedwith what theyidentified as the 'Berlin-Koreaparallel.' Holding the Soviet Union responsible for North Korea's aggression,Washington believed that in NorthKorea's attackit was witnessing a new Sovietcapability that could give theUSSR a decisiveedge in the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • Yugoslav Destruction After the Cold War
    STASIS AMONG POWERS: YUGOSLAV DESTRUCTION AFTER THE COLD WAR A dissertation presented by Mladen Stevan Mrdalj to The Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Political Science Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts December 2015 STASIS AMONG POWERS: YUGOSLAV DESTRUCTION AFTER THE COLD WAR by Mladen Stevan Mrdalj ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University December 2015 2 Abstract This research investigates the causes of Yugoslavia’s violent destruction in the 1990’s. It builds its argument on the interaction of international and domestic factors. In doing so, it details the origins of Yugoslav ideology as a fluid concept rooted in the early 19th century Croatian national movement. Tracing the evolving nationalist competition among Serbs and Croats, it demonstrates inherent contradictions of the Yugoslav project. These contradictions resulted in ethnic outbidding among Croatian nationalists and communists against the perceived Serbian hegemony. This dynamic drove the gradual erosion of Yugoslav state capacity during Cold War. The end of Cold War coincided with the height of internal Yugoslav conflict. Managing the collapse of Soviet Union and communism imposed both strategic and normative imperatives on the Western allies. These imperatives largely determined external policy toward Yugoslavia. They incentivized and inhibited domestic actors in pursuit of their goals. The result was the collapse of the country with varying degrees of violence. The findings support further research on international causes of civil wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuban Missile Crisis Final
    US and USSR Joint Crisis Committee Cuban Missile Crisis St. John's Preparatory School • Danvers, Massachusetts • 9 December 2017 1! Letter from the chair Delegates, Welcome to the Cuban Missile Crisis joint crisis. My name is Trevaughn and I’m currently a senior at St. John's Prep and this is my fourth year as a member of Model UN. When I'm not involved in Model UN, I spend my time in the Science and Technology Club, while also playing football and rugby. As one of the highest stakes diplomatic crises of the 20th century, the Cuban Missile Crisis holds a unique place in US history. The actions that took place in the Cuban Missile Crisis has shaped America's current foreign policy. I look forward to see how the Missile Crisis plays out in my commit- tee. If you need to contact me, my email is [email protected] Sincerely, Trevaughn Wright-Reynolds, Class of 2018 Committee Description The joint crisis committee on the Cuban Missile Crisis consists of the opposing American Ex- ecutive committee (Excomm), and the Soviet Politburo. Both of these committees served to advise the heads of state of the United States of America (USA) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) during times of crisis, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis. Although both groups exist only to advise the respective heads of state of the US and USSR, for the purposes of this committee, all mem- bers will have a single vote regarding resolutions and directives.The delegates representing Kennedy 2! and Khrushchev will have veto power over all resolutions and directives, although this veto can be overridden by a ⅔ majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of the Cold War
    Timeline of the Cold War 1945 Defeat of Germany and Japan February 4-11: Yalta Conference meeting of FDR, Churchill, Stalin - the 'Big Three' Soviet Union has control of Eastern Europe. The Cold War Begins May 8: VE Day - Victory in Europe. Germany surrenders to the Red Army in Berlin July: Potsdam Conference - Germany was officially partitioned into four zones of occupation. August 6: The United States drops atomic bomb on Hiroshima (20 kiloton bomb 'Little Boy' kills 80,000) August 8: Russia declares war on Japan August 9: The United States drops atomic bomb on Nagasaki (22 kiloton 'Fat Man' kills 70,000) August 14 : Japanese surrender End of World War II August 15: Emperor surrender broadcast - VJ Day 1946 February 9: Stalin hostile speech - communism & capitalism were incompatible March 5 : "Sinews of Peace" Iron Curtain Speech by Winston Churchill - "an "iron curtain" has descended on Europe" March 10: Truman demands Russia leave Iran July 1: Operation Crossroads with Test Able was the first public demonstration of America's atomic arsenal July 25: America's Test Baker - underwater explosion 1947 Containment March 12 : Truman Doctrine - Truman declares active role in Greek Civil War June : Marshall Plan is announced setting a precedent for helping countries combat poverty, disease and malnutrition September 2: Rio Pact - U.S. meet 19 Latin American countries and created a security zone around the hemisphere 1948 Containment February 25 : Communist takeover in Czechoslovakia March 2: Truman's Loyalty Program created to catch Cold War
    [Show full text]
  • National Historical Park Pennsylvania
    INDEPENDENCE National Historical Park Pennsylvania Hall was begun in the spring of 1732, when from this third casting is the one you see In May 1775, the Second Continental Con­ The Constitutional Convention, 1787 where Federal Hall National Memorial now ground was broken. today.) gress met in the Pennsylvania State House stands. Then, in 1790, it came to Philadel­ Edmund Woolley, master carpenter, and As the official bell of the Pennsylvania (Independence Hall) and decided to move The Articles of Confederation and Perpet­ phia for 10 years. Congress sat in the new INDEPENDENCE ual Union were drafted while the war was in Andrew Hamilton, lawyer, planned the State House, the Liberty Bell was intended to from protest to resistance. Warfare between County Court House (now known as Con­ building and supervised its construction. It be rung on public occasions. During the the colonists and British troops already had progress. They were agreed to by the last of gress Hall) and the United States Supreme NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK was designed in the dignity of the Georgian Revolution, when the British Army occupied begun in Massachusetts. In June the Con­ the Thirteen States and went into effect in Court in the new City Hall. In Congress period. Independence Hall, with its wings, Philadelphia in 1777, the bell was removed gress chose George Washington to be Gen­ the final year of the war. Under the Arti­ Hall, George Washington was inaugurated has long been considered one of the most to Allentown, where it was hidden for almost eral and Commander in Chief of the Army, cles, the Congress met in various towns, only for his second term as President.
    [Show full text]