At Checkpoint Charlie, US and Soviet Tanks Faced Each Other at Point-Blank Range

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

At Checkpoint Charlie, US and Soviet Tanks Faced Each Other at Point-Blank Range At Checkpoint Charlie, US and Soviet tanks faced each other at point-blank range. AP Ppoto/Kreusch 92 AIR FORCE Magazine / September 2011 Showdown in BerlinBy John T. Correll any place was ground zero for the The First Crisis from the 1948 confrontation—Walter Cold War, it was Berlin. The first Berlin crisis was in 1948, Ulbricht, the Communist Party boss in Awash in intrigue, the former when the Soviets and East Germans East Germany. capital of the Third Reich lay 110 attempted to cut the city off from the Ulbricht, handpicked for the job by miles inside the Iron Curtain but outside world. However, three air the Soviet Premier, Joseph Stalin, was was not part of East Germany. corridors into Berlin, each 20 miles charmless, intense, and dogmatic, but IEach of the four victorious powers in wide, remained open. The Americans a good administrator and a reliable en- Europe in World War II—the United and British responded with the Berlin forcer of Soviet hegemony. Stalin had States, Britain, France, and the Soviet Airlift, which sustained West Berlin visions of a unified Germany as part Union—held control of a sector of the with food, fuel, and other supplies from of the Soviet sphere of influence, but city, which would be preserved as the June 1948 to September 1949. Ulbricht had so antagonized the popu- future capital of a reunified Germany. Some senior officials in the US De- lace the Communists had no chance of Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev partment of State had favored abandon- winning free elections. called it “the most dangerous place in the ing Berlin. They opposed the position The Federal Republic of Germany, world.” Nowhere else did the superpow- of Gen. Lucius D. Clay, commander consisting of the consolidated Western ers confront each other so closely and of US forces in Europe and military zones, was established in May 1949 constantly. West Berlin was a source of governor of the US zone in Germany, with its capital at Bonn. In anticipation embarrassment and aggravation to the who was unswerving in his determina- of eventual reunification, West Germany Communist East German regime, which tion to break the blockade. President offered citizenship to all Germans, suffered by comparison. Large numbers Harry Truman backed Clay and the wherever they lived. Ulbricht’s regime, of East Germans, especially skilled airlift succeeded. Clay would return the German Democratic Republic, be- workers, fled to the West through Berlin. to play a leading role in the 1961 Ber- gan in October 1949 and claimed East Three times in the decades follow- lin Crisis, as would another principal Berlin as its capital, which ignored the ing World War II, the Soviet Union provoked crisis in Berlin. The third and last of these crises was set in motion June 4, 1961, when Khrushchev gave Western armed forces six months to get out of Berlin. The Russians had made similar demands before, but this time, Staff map by Zaur Eylanbekov they held the hard line and the situation escalated rapidly. The Berlin Wall, constructed by the East Germans beginning Aug. 13 that year, cut off access to West Berlin. For those attempting to escape, the East German border guards had shoot-to- kill orders. As the crisis escalated, the US Air Force and the Air National Guard rein- forced NATO with the largest overseas movement of aircraft since World War II. Before it was over, US and Soviet tanks faced each other at point-blank range at Checkpoint Charlie, raising the fear the superpowers would go to war. Ramifications from the Berlin Crisis of 1961 persisted in Cold War relations for AP photo by Kreusch the next 30 years. The roots of the confrontation went back to September 1944, when Allied occupation protocol divided postwar Germany into three zones, and Berlin into three sectors (Soviet, American, and Left: US tanks (foreground) and Soviet tanks face off at Checkpoint Charlie in Ber- British). The protocol was amended in lin in October 1961. For 16 tense hours, the world watched as the two superpowers stared one another down. Above: A map of Berlin, divided into four zones by the July 1945 to provide France a role in Allies after World War II, shows how West Berlin was completely surrounded by the occupation. communist East Germany. Smack in the center is Checkpoint Charlie. AIR FORCE Magazine / September 2011 93 Berlin, were not met. The Paris summit fell apart when the Soviets shot down an ANG photo American U-2 spyplane over their terri- tory in May 1960 and captured the pilot. Khrushchev calculated his chances of success on Berlin might improve with the younger, less-experienced John F. Kennedy, who won the presi- dential election in November 1960. The third Berlin crisis was about to begin. Threats at the Summit The Kennedy Administration took office in January 1961 intent on a new approach. “Truman and Eisenhower believed that Hitler had started World War II because he had thought that his enemies were weak and not ready to act,” said Cold War historian W. R. Smyser. “They strengthened and united An F-104 from the 151st Fighter-Interceptor Group, McGhee-Tyson AFB, Tenn., is the West to avoid having Moscow loaded onto a C-124 for transport. The 151st FIS set a record for flying hours per jet fighter in 1962. repeat Hitler’s mistake. But Kennedy and his advisors looked more closely city’s four-power status. In 1952, East crisis with a demand on Nov. 27, 1958, at the events that had led to World Germany closed and fortified the border that the Western powers renounce their War I. They believed that a sequence with West Germany, although no barriers rights in Berlin and “make it possible to of mutually threatening mobilization were erected in Berlin. create a normal situation in the capital plans and actions had gotten out of hand Stalin died in 1953 and was succeeded of the German Democratic Republic.” and escalated into war in 1914. They by Khrushchev, who became First Sec- If the Allies did not do so within six thought that US policy should strive retary of the Communist Party in 1953 months, the Soviet Union would transfer to avoid such misunderstandings.” and Premier in 1958. He inherited the to Ulbricht’s GDR full control of East Most of the White House staff and Berlin problem—and Ulbricht. Berlin and the access routes to West much of the State Department favored a East Germany was the keystone of Berlin. That would end the USSR’s client empire in Europe and four-power control of could not be allowed to fail. In 1953, the city and force the Soviet tanks were called in to suppress a West to deal directly revolt by East German workers reacting with Ulbricht. to harsh living conditions, higher taxes, British Prime Minis- and increased work quotas. ter Harold Macmillan, fearful of the risk of war, The Second Crisis wanted to make con- The Berlin problem had not been cessions right away but Picture Alliance/DPA photo by Otto Noecker solved in 1948, only put into remis- President Eisenhower sion. From the East German and Soviet would not be stampeded. perspective, the Allied enclave was a Negotiations led to a foreign body in their territory. Berlin visit by Khrushchev to forced a side-by-side comparison of Eisenhower’s presiden- West German success and East Ger- tial retreat at Camp Da- man bumbling. It was also a magnet vid in Maryland where for emigrants. By 1958, four million the two leaders made East Germans had fled with Berlin as plans for a summit meet- the favorite escape route. ing in Paris the follow- Khrushchev believed the “correlation ing May to continue the of forces” was moving in his direction. discussion. Soviet power and prestige had grown Khrushchev withdrew since 1948. The United States no longer his six-month deadline, had a monopoly on nuclear weapons and but in a drunken New the USSR was first to launch an ICBM Year’s Eve party in Mos- and first in space with the Sputnik satel- cow, threatened the US lite in 1957. ambassador with nuclear Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev shakes his fist during Ulbricht stepped up his pleas for the war if his demands, in- a 1960 press conference in Paris. Khrushchev believed “neutralization” of West Berlin, and cluding the withdrawal his chances of success in Berlin were greater with the Khrushchev set off the second Berlin of Allied troops from election of US President John Kennedy. 94 AIR FORCE Magazine / September 2011 softer line on Berlin. Their counsel was He had already stockpiled balanced somewhat by Dean Acheson, enough barbed wire to the flinty former Secretary of State for seal the 27-mile dividing Truman, brought out of retirement as line between sectors and a special advisor and who was wither- strengthen the 69-mile ing in his contempt for the soft liners. outer perimeter separat- In the first six months of 1961 alone, ing West Berlin from the 100,000 East Germans crossed over East German countryside. to the West. Ulbricht complained that Berlin awoke Aug. 13 West Berlin was “sucking out” the East to find the barricades in German workforce. place. After waiting for A summit meeting between Kennedy three days to see if the and Khrushchev was arranged for June West reacted, Khrushchev 1961, but before then, Khrushchev’s allowed Ulbricht to begin impression of the US President was building the brick and con- reinforced by the Bay of Pigs fiasco crete barrier that would be in April—and Kennedy’s mishandling known as the Berlin Wall.
Recommended publications
  • Wallmaps.Pdf
    S Prenzlauer Allee U Volta Straße U Eberswalder Straße 1 S Greifswalder Straße U Bernauer Straße U Schwartzkopff Straße U Senefelderplatz S Nordbanhof Zinnowitzer U Straße U Rosenthaler Plaz U Rosa-Luxembury-Platz Berlin HBF DB Oranienburger U U Weinmeister Straße Tor S Oranienburger S Hauptbahnhof Straße S Alexander Platz Hackescher Markt U 2 S Alexander Plaz Friedrich Straße S U Schilling Straße U Friedrich Straße U Weberwiese U Kloster Straße S Unter den Linden Strausberger Platz U U Jannowitzbrucke U Franzosische Straße Frankfurter U Jannowitzbrucke S Tor 3 4 U Hausvogtei Platz U Markisches Museum Mohren Straße U U Spittelmarkt U Stadtmitte U Heirch-Heine-Straße S Ostbahnhof Potsdamer Platz S U Potsdamer Platz 5 S U Koch Straße Warschauer Straße Anhalter Bahnhof U SS Moritzplatz U Warschauer Mendelssohn- U Straße Bartholdy-Park U Kottbusser Schlesisches Tor U U Mockernbrucke U Gorlitzer U Prinzen Straße Tor U Gleisdreieck U Hallesches Tor Bahnhof U Mehringdamm 400 METRES Berlin wall - - - U Schonlein Straße Download five Eyewitnesses describe Stasi file and discover Maps and video podtours Guardian Berlin Wall what it was like to wake the plans had been films from iTunes to up to a divided city, with made for her life. Many 1. Bernauer Strasse Construction and escapes take with you to the the wall slicing through put their lives at risk city to use as audio- their lives, cutting them trying to oppose the 2. Brandenburg gate visual guides on your off from family and regime. Plus Guardian Life on both sides of the iPod or mp3 player. friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankettmappe Konferenz Und Events
    Conferences & Events Conferences & Events Discover the “new center of Berlin” - located in the heart of Germany’s capital between “Potsdamer Platz” and “Alexanderplatz”. The Courtyard by Marriott Berlin City Center offers excellent services to its international clientele since the opening in June 2005. Just a short walk away, you find a few of Berlin’s main attractions, such as the famous “Friedrichstrasse” with the legendary Checkpoint Charlie, the “Gendarmenmarkt” and the “Nikolaiviertel”. Experience Berlin’s fascinating and exciting atmosphere and discover an extraordinary hotel concept full with comfort, elegance and a colorful design. Hotel information Room categories Hotel opening: June 2005 Total number: 267 Floors: 6 Deluxe: 118 Twin + 118 King / 26 sqm Non smoking rooms: 1st - 6th floor/ 267 rooms Superior: 21 rooms / 33 sqm (renovated in 2014) Junior Suite: 6 rooms / 44 sqm Conference rooms: 11 Suite: 4 rooms / 53 sqm (renovated in 2016) Handicap-accessible: 19 rooms Wheelchair-accessible: 5 rooms Check in: 03:00 p.m. Check out: 12:00 p.m. Courtyard® by Marriott Berlin City Center Axel-Springer-Strasse 55, 10117 Berlin T +49 30 8009280 | marriott.com/BERMT Room facilities King bed: 1.80 m x 2 m Twin bed: 1.20 m x 2 m All rooms are equipped with an air-conditioning, Pay-TV, ironing station, two telephones, hair dryer, mini-fridge, coffee and tea making facilities, high-speed internet access and safe in laptop size. Children Baby beds are free of charge and are made according to Marriott standards. Internet Wireless internet is available throughout the hotel and free of charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Escape to Freedom: a Story of One Teenager’S Attempt to Get Across the Berlin Wall
    Escape to Freedom: A story of one teenager’s attempt to get across the Berlin Wall By Kristin Lewis From the April 2019 SCOPE Issue Every muscle in Hartmut Richter’s body ached. He’d been in the cold water for four agonizing hours. His body temperature had plummeted dangerously low. Now, to his horror, he found himself trapped in the water by a wall of razor-sharp barbed wire. Precious seconds ticked by. The area was crawling with guards carrying machine guns. Some had snarling dogs at their sides. If they caught Hartmut, he could be thrown in prison—or worse. These men were trained to shoot on sight. Hartmut grabbed the wire with his bare hands. He began pulling it apart, hoping he could make a hole large enough to squeeze through. Hartmut Richter was not a criminal escaping from jail. He was not a bank robber on the run. He was simply an 18-year-old kid who wanted nothing more than to be free—to listen to the music he wanted to listen to, to say what he wanted to say and think what he wanted to think. And right now, Hartmut was risking everything to escape from his country and start a new life. A Bleak Time Hartmut was born in Germany in 1948. He lived near the capital city of Berlin with his parents and younger sister. This was a bleak time for his country. Only three years earlier, Germany had been defeated in World War II. During the war, Germany had invaded nearly every other country in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Master's Theses (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University Recommended Citation Labinski, Nicholas, "Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin" (2011). Master's Theses (2009 -). Paper 104. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/104 EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN by Nicholas Labinski A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee, Wisconsin August 2011 ABSTRACT EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN Nicholas Labinski Marquette University, 2011 This paper examines John F. Kennedy’s rhetoric concerning the Berlin Crisis (1961-1963). Three major speeches are analyzed: Kennedy’s Radio and Television Report to the American People on the Berlin Crisis , the Address at Rudolph Wilde Platz and the Address at the Free University. The study interrogates the rhetorical strategies implemented by Kennedy in confronting Khrushchev over the explosive situation in Berlin. The paper attempts to answer the following research questions: What is the historical context that helped frame the rhetorical situation Kennedy faced? What rhetorical strategies and tactics did Kennedy employ in these speeches? How might Kennedy's speeches extend our understanding of presidential public address? What is the impact of Kennedy's speeches on U.S. German relations and the development of U.S. and German Policy? What implications might these speeches have for the study and execution of presidential power and international diplomacy? Using a historical-rhetorical methodology that incorporates the historical circumstances surrounding the crisis into the analysis, this examination of Kennedy’s rhetoric reveals his evolution concerning Berlin and his Cold War strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Tageszeitung (Taz) Article on the Opening of the Berlin Wall
    Volume 10. One Germany in Europe, 1989 – 2009 The Fall of the Berlin Wall (November 9, 1989) Two journalists from Die Tageszeitung (taz), a left-of-center West Berlin newspaper, describe the excitement generated by the sudden opening of the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989. The event was the result of internal pressure applied by East German citizens, and it evoked spontaneous celebration from a people who could once again freely cross the border and rekindle relationships with friends and relatives on the other side. (Please note: the dancing bear mentioned below is a figurative reference to West Berlin's official mascot. Beginning in 1954, the flag of West Berlin featured a red bear set against a white background. In 1990, the bear became the mascot of a unified Berlin. The former West Berlin flag now represents the city as a whole.) "We Want In!" The Bear Is Dancing on the Border Around midnight, RIAS – the American radio station broadcasting to the East – still has no traffic interruptions to report. Yet total chaos already reigns at the border checkpoint on Invalidenstrasse. People parked their cars at all conceivable angles, jumped out, and ran to the border. The transmission tower of the radio station "Free Berlin" is already engulfed by a throng of people (from the West) – waiting for the masses (from the East) to break through. After three seconds, even the most hardened taz editor finds himself applauding the first Trabi he sees. Everyone gets caught up in the frenzy, whether she wants to or not. Even the soberest members of the crowd are applauding, shrieking, gasping, giggling.
    [Show full text]
  • Friedrichstrasse in Berlin and Central Street in Harbin As Examples1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE HISTORICAL URBAN FABRIC provided by Siberian Federal University Digital Repository UDC 711 Wang Haoyu, Li Zhenyu College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, China, Shanghai, Yangpu District, Siping Road 1239, 200092 e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] COMPARISON STUDY OF TYPICAL HISTORICAL STREET SPACE BETWEEN CHINA AND GERMANY: FRIEDRICHSTRASSE IN BERLIN AND CENTRAL STREET IN HARBIN AS EXAMPLES1 Abstract: The article analyses the similarities and the differences of typical historical street space and urban fabric in China and Germany, taking Friedrichstrasse in Berlin and Central Street in Harbin as examples. The analysis mainly starts from four aspects: geographical environment, developing history, urban space fabric and building style. The two cities have similar geographical latitudes but different climate. Both of the two cities have a long history of development. As historical streets, both of the two streets are the main shopping street in the two cities respectively. The Berlin one is a famous luxury-shopping street while the Harbin one is a famous shopping destination for both citizens and tourists. As for the urban fabric, both streets have fishbone-like spatial structure but with different densities; both streets are pedestrian-friendly but with different scales; both have courtyards space structure but in different forms. Friedrichstrasse was divided into two parts during the World War II and it was partly ruined. It was rebuilt in IBA in the 1980s and many architectural masterpieces were designed by such world-known architects like O.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuban Missile Crisis Final
    US and USSR Joint Crisis Committee Cuban Missile Crisis St. John's Preparatory School • Danvers, Massachusetts • 9 December 2017 1! Letter from the chair Delegates, Welcome to the Cuban Missile Crisis joint crisis. My name is Trevaughn and I’m currently a senior at St. John's Prep and this is my fourth year as a member of Model UN. When I'm not involved in Model UN, I spend my time in the Science and Technology Club, while also playing football and rugby. As one of the highest stakes diplomatic crises of the 20th century, the Cuban Missile Crisis holds a unique place in US history. The actions that took place in the Cuban Missile Crisis has shaped America's current foreign policy. I look forward to see how the Missile Crisis plays out in my commit- tee. If you need to contact me, my email is [email protected] Sincerely, Trevaughn Wright-Reynolds, Class of 2018 Committee Description The joint crisis committee on the Cuban Missile Crisis consists of the opposing American Ex- ecutive committee (Excomm), and the Soviet Politburo. Both of these committees served to advise the heads of state of the United States of America (USA) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) during times of crisis, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis. Although both groups exist only to advise the respective heads of state of the US and USSR, for the purposes of this committee, all mem- bers will have a single vote regarding resolutions and directives.The delegates representing Kennedy 2! and Khrushchev will have veto power over all resolutions and directives, although this veto can be overridden by a ⅔ majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Tours of the Allied Museum
    Group Tours of the Allied Museum Information for group tours, study tours, and class trips Experience the eventful history of a friendship Dear Tour Operators, No other city in Germany bears the enduring marks of the Allies like Berlin. After victory over Nazi Germany in May, 1945, and the invasion of Soviet, American, British, and French occupation forces, Berlin became a quadripartite city and soon after, the prime arena of the Cold War. In its permanent exhibition, How Enemies Became Friends, the Allied Museum tells the story of the Western powers in Berlin and Germany from 1945 to 1994. Original exhibits and large-scale objects include a plane from the Berlin 3 Airlift, a restored segment of a tunnel used for espionage, and the guardhouse from Checkpoint Charlie. They bring to life the eventful history of a friendship between the people of Berlin and the Americans, British, and French. The Allied Museum In addition to the permanent exhibition, a cycle of temporary exhibitions Contents illuminate subjects of particular interest. Located in the green southwest of the city, in the heart of the former American sector, the Allied Museum in Zehlendorf makes the perfect start for a visit to Berlin. Experience history come alive – discover Berlin! The Allied Museum 3 Group tours ­ 4 Study tours ­ 8 Class trips 12 Getting here and visitor services 16 Credits 18 The best place to understand Berlin Berlin is a city with a very special history and the Allied Museum is the best place to discover that. It illuminates the full tension and drama of the story.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronx Princess
    POV Community Engagement & Education Discussion GuiDe My Perestroika A Film by Robin Hessman www.pbs.org/pov PoV BLeatctkegrr foruonmd tinhefo friLmmamtaiokner Robin Hessman Photo courtesy of Red square Productions My Connection to Russia i have been curious about Russia and the soviet union for as long as i can remember. Growing up in the united states in the 1970s and early 1980s, it was impossible to miss the fact that the ussR was consid - ered our enemy and, according to movies and television, plotting to destroy the planet with its nuclear weapons. interest in the “evil empire” was everywhere. When i was seven, my second grade class made up a game: usA versus ussR. The girls were the united states, with headquarters at the jungle gym. The boys were the ussR, and were hunkered down at the sand box. And for some reason, the boys allowed me to be the only girl in the ussR. And thus, i was suddenly faced with a dilemma. My best friends were girls, but i was a curious kid, and i wanted to know what was going on in the ussR. un - able to choose between them, i became a double agent. i suppose it was my insatiable curiosity about this purportedly diabolical country that led me to beg my parents to allow me to subscribe to Soviet Life magazine at age ten. (i have no idea how i even knew it existed.) As children of the Mccarthy era in the 1950s, when thousands of Americans were accused of disloyalty and being communist sympathizers, my parents were concerned about the repercussions that the subscription to Soviet Life could have on my future.
    [Show full text]
  • DEFA Directors and Their Criticism of the Berlin Wall
    «Das ist die Mauer, die quer durchgeht. Dahinter liegt die Stadt und das Glück.» DEFA Directors and their Criticism of the Berlin Wall SEBASTIAN HEIDUSCHKE MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY This article examines the strategies used by directors of the East German film monopoly Deutsche Film-Aktiengesellschaft (DEFA) to voice their disap- proval of the Berlin Wall.1 My aim is to show how it was possible, despite universal censorship in East Germany, to create films that addressed the wall as an inhumane means to imprison the East German people. Although many DEFA films adhered to socialist law and reiterated the official doctrine of the «antifascist protection rampart» on the silver screen, an analysis of three DEFA films will demonstrate how the representation of human crisis was used as a means to criticize the wall.2 The films Das Kleid (Konrad Petzold, 1961), Der geteilte Himmel (Konrad Wolf, 1964), and Die Architekten (Peter Kahane, 1990) address walls in a variety of functions and appearances as rep- resentations, symbols, and metaphors of the barrier between East and West Germany. Interest in DEFA has certainly increased during the last decade, and many scholars have introduced a meaningful variety of topics regarding the history of East Germany’s film company and its films. In addition to book-length works that deal exclusively with the cinema of East Germany, many articles have looked at DEFA’s film genres, provided case studies of single DEFA films, and engaged in sociological or historical analyses of East German so- ciety and its films.3 In order to expand the current discussion of DEFA, this article applies a sociocultural reading to the three DEFA films Das Kleid, Der geteilte Himmel, and Die Architekten with the goal of introducing the new subtopic of roles and functions of the Berlin Wall in East German film to the field of DEFA studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Crackdown
    CONFLICT IN THE SOVIET UNION Black January in Azerbaidzhan Human Rights Watch/Helsinki (formerly Helsinki Watch) The InterInter----RepublicRepublic Memorial Society CONFLICT IN THE SOVIET UNION Black January in Azerbaidzhan Human Rights Watch/Helsinki (formerly Helsinki Watch) The InterInter----RepublicRepublic Memorial Society Human Rights Watch New York $$$ Washington $$$ Los Angeles $$$ London Copyright (c) May 1991 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN: 1-56432-027-8 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 91-72672 Human Rights Watch/Helsinki (formerly Helsinki Watch) Human Rights Watch/Helsinki was established in 1978 to monitor and promote domestic and international compliance with the human rights provisions of the 1975 Helsinki Accords. It is affiliated with the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, which is based in Vienna, Austria. Jeri Laber is the executive director; Lois Whitman is the deputy director; Holly Cartner and Julie Mertus are counsel; Erika Dailey, Rachel Denber, Ivana Nizich and Christopher Panico are research associates; Christina Derry, Ivan Lupis, Alexander Petrov and Isabelle Tin-Aung are associates; ðeljka MarkiÉ and Vlatka MiheliÉ are consultants. Jonathan Fanton is the chair of the advisory committee and Alice Henkin is vice chair. International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights Helsinki Watch is an affiliate of the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, a human rights organization that links Helsinki Committees in the following countries of Europe and North America: Austria, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, England, the Federal Republic of Germany, Finland, France, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, the Soviet Union, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United States, Yugoslavia.
    [Show full text]
  • US Army, Berlin, 1961-1994
    COLD WARRIORS, GOOD NEIGHBORS, SMART POWER: U.S. ARMY, BERLIN, 1961-1994 Rex A. Childers A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2015 Committee: Beth A. Griech-Polelle, Advisor Marc V. Simon Graduate Faculty Representative Bill Allison Michael E. Brooks © 2015 Rex Childers All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor The end of the Cold War and the manner in which it was “won” by the Allied nations ignited debate over the utility of military power as a source of American leadership in the new unipolar world. A popular theme arose, that a new form of state power, soft power, had the capacity to achieve America’s interests as it prepared to enter the 21st century. The idea that expensive and dangerous technologies could be replaced by investments in peaceful means of influence, wielded by America’s foreign policy professionals to foster a new cooperative spirit in the world, was naturally attractive. The United States could be relieved of much of its global military presence and reduce its military’s intrusions upon foreign people and their cultures. This dissertation challenges the assumption that the impact of military stationing in the Cold War was limited to hard power. In the case of the U.S. Army in Berlin, the unit and its members practiced civic, social, cultural, and political behaviors that meet the criteria of the post-Cold War branded term, soft power. In their daily interactions with Berliners, they exercised the full spectrum of foreign policy smart power tools, as Cold Warrior defenders of West Berlin and in compliance with U.S.
    [Show full text]