The Constitutional Law of German Unification , 50 Md

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Constitutional Law of German Unification , 50 Md Maryland Law Review Volume 50 | Issue 3 Article 3 The onsC titutional Law of German Unification Peter E. Quint Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter E. Quint, The Constitutional Law of German Unification , 50 Md. L. Rev. 475 (1991) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol50/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact smccarty@law.umaryland.edu. m@ :::z::::: :::::: ::: . : ' " ' ... 0... .. = . ... ..... .. .... ..... -'.'. :. ~......>.. -.., ....... .. ...... _ .- :i..:""- ............ .:!........ :. !!:"° S. ... .. .. MARYLAND LAW REVIEW VOLUME 50 1991 NUMBER 3 © Copyright Maryland Law Review, Inc. 1991 Articles THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF GERMAN UNIFICATION PETER E. QUINT* TABLE OF CONTENTS MAP: GERMANY, 1945 INTRODUCTION .............................................. 476 I. UNION AND DISUNION IN GERMAN HISTORY ............. 478 II. THE LEGAL STATUS OF GERMANY, 1945-1989 .......... 480 III. POLITICAL REVOLUTION IN THE GDR, 1989-1990 ....... 483 IV. CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN THE GDR, 1989-1990 .... 488 A. Background: The 1968/74 Constitution of the GDR ... 488 B. Proposalsfor a New GDR Constitution-The Round Table Draft ....................................... 493 C. Amending the GDR Constitution-The Old Volkskammer and the Modrow Government ........................ 496 Copyright © 1991 by Peter E. Quint. * Professor of Law, University of Maryland. A.B., Harvard University, 1961; LL.B., 1964; Diploma in Law, Oxford University, 1965. For valuable comments on earlier drafts of this article I am grateful to Winfried Brugger, Thomas Giegerich, Eckart Klein, Alexander Reuter, William Reynolds, Edward Tomlinson, and Giinther Wilms. I learned much from their comments, but I remain fully responsible for all positions taken here and for any errors of law or of fact. For valuable research assistance, I am grateful to Cherylle Corpuz, Joan Gavigan, Nancy Hoffmann, Kristin Klein, and Gerk Oberman. Much of this article was written while I was a guest at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg. I would like to express my gratitude to the directors, fellows, and staff of the Institute for their extraordinary kindness and hospitality on this as well as many other occasions. The map on the facing page is from A HISTORY OF MODERN GERMANY by Hajo Hol- born. Copyright © 1959 by Hajo Holborn. Reprinted by permission of Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. 475 476 MARYLAND LAW REVIEW [VOL. 50:475 D. Amending the GDR Constitution- The New Volkskammer and the de Maizire Government ..................... 501 V. METHODS OF UNIFICATION UNDER THE BASIC LAW ...... 506 A. Confederation ...................................... 506 B. Article 146 of the Basic Law . : ...................... 507 C. Article 23 of the Basic Law ......................... 510 D. A New Constitution Under Article 146 After Accession Under Article 23 ................................... 513 VI. THE STATE TREATY ................................... 516 VII. RECONSTITUTION OF THE STATES IN THE GDR .......... 524 VIII. THE UNIFICATION TREATY ............................. 530 A. Purpose and General Structure of the Treaty ........... 530 B. Problems Relating to Expropriated Property ............ 541 C. A bortion .......................................... 562 D. The Civil Service in Eastern Germany ................ 570 IX. CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS OF THE FIRST ALL-GERMAN ELECTION ............................................ 581 X. THE LEGAL STATUS OF DIVIDED GERMANY AND THE ROLE OF THE WORLD WAR II ALLIES IN THE PROCESS OF UNIFICATION ...................................... 588 A. Reserved Rights of the Allies ......................... 589 B. The Oder-Neile Line ............................... 599 C. NA TO ............................................ 605 D. The Two Plus Four Treaty and the Legal Status of Germany .......................................... 611 XI. UNIFICATION AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ........................................... 620 CONCLUSION ................................................ 624 APPENDIX A: CALENDAR OF EVENTS-THE BACKGROUND OF GERMAN UNIFICATION ......................... 629 APPENDIX B: CALENDAR OF EVENTS- 1989-1990 ............ 630 APPENDIX C: GLOSSARY OF FREQUENTLY USED TERMS ....... 631 INTRODUCTION In the mid-summer of 1989 the German Democratic Republic- known as the GDR or East Germany-was an autocratic state led by an entrenched Communist Party, a loyal member of the Warsaw Pact and, in many ways, a haughty counterpart of the Federal Re- public of Germany (West Germany), which it confronted with a mix- ture of hostility and grudging accommodation across the divide created by the Cold War. Over the following year and a half, a dra- 1991] CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF GERMAN UNIFICATION 477 matic process of change transformed the political system of East Germany and culminated in the GDR's "accession" to the Federal Republic itself. At the same time, the division of Europe, which the division of Germany came to symbolize, had largely ceased to exist. Viewed as a social and economic process, German unification was by no means completed when the GDR acceded to the Federal Republic on October 3, 1990. The two economic systems remain distinctly-even startlingly-different, and the sharp psychic divi- sions of four decades, which some Germans refer to as the "Wall in the head," will probably continue to divide the two regions for years to come. The unification of October 3, therefore, represented primarily an achievement in the realm of politics and law-the culmination of a series of agreements and legislative provisions developed within a highly articulated constitutional framework that was drafted more than forty years ago with such an occurrence in mind. In the rapid events of 1989-90, the legal and constitutional development seemed to be one aspect of the process of unification that-unlike more un- ruly economic and social phenomena-was subject to a measure of deliberation and rational control. The constitutional structure that emerged reflected both anxi- ety and optimism; its drafters sought to diminish baneful legacies of the past while opening opportunities for future social, political, and economic development. Like many great constituent acts, this con- stitutional structure will provide guidelines for the development of more complex and difficult social processes, and one measure of its success will be whether it can channel and guide those processes or whether, in the end, it will be overwhelmed by them. This Article seeks to explain the major events of German unifi- cation from the constitutional perspective. In this overview, consti- tutional law will be understood in a broad sense-7including not only the interpretation of constitutional texts by co~irts, scholars, and governments, but also extending to important international ar- rangements that help define the nature of a state, as well as certain central statutes, regulations, and practices that give concrete mean- ing to the underlying principles of a constitutional system. Although this review will outline the developments of 1989-90, it will also illustrate how the issues of unification once again raised critical disputes between left and right that have been present throughout the history of the Federal Republic and even, in several cases, have their roots in earlier German history. In many instances these political issues were not resolved upon unification. Indeed 478 MARYLAND LAW REVIEW [VOL. 50:475 they remain-along with numerous economic and social problems- as part of the continuing program of political debate for coming years. Longstanding political disputes in Germany have affected the course of unification, but the fact of unification itself-and the terms upon which it was accomplished-will have its own substantial im- pact on the further development of these important political issues. I. UNION AND DISUNION IN GERMAN HISTORY Unification is one of the great themes of modern German his- tory. Unlike England and France-which had formed unified na- tion-states in the Middle Ages-Germany came into the nineteenth century a variegated collection of kingdoms, duchies, city-states, and other principalities, loosely held together in the political league of the Holy Roman Empire. The Empire was dissolved in 1806 at Napoleon's order and, following the Congress of Vienna and Napo- leon's final defeat in 1815, the "Germanic Confederation" arose in its place. Like the Holy Roman Empire, however, this was more in the nature of a treaty community (Staatenbund) than any sort of real political union. But it and the early nineteenth century Customs Union were steps in that direction. In the early nineteenth century-in sharp contrast with twenti- eth century movements-political progressivism and nationalism were often allied in Germany. A first attempt at an all-German con- stitution was the Paul's Church Constitution of 1849, drafted under the impetus of the 1848 Revolution. Although this document never went into effect, it reflected the view that basic rights and a measure of popular control could be more readily expected from a unified Germany than from the absolutist monarchs and princes who con- trolled most
Recommended publications
  • Die Thüringer CDU in Der SBZ/DDR – Blockpartei Mit Eigeninteresse
    Bertram Triebel Die Thüringer CDU in der SBZ/DDR – Blockpartei mit Eigeninteresse Bertram Triebel Die Thüringer CDU in der SBZ/DDR Blockpartei mit Eigeninteresse Herausgegeben im Auftrag der Unabhängigen Historischen Kommission zur Geschichte der CDU in Thüringen und in den Bezirken Erfurt, Gera und Suhl von 1945 bis 1990 von Jörg Ganzenmüller und Hermann Wentker Herausgegeben im Auftrag der Unabhängigen Historischen Kommission zur Geschichte der CDU in Thüringen und in den Bezirken Erfurt, Gera und Suhl von 1945 bis 1990 von Jörg Ganzenmüller und Hermann Wentker Das Werk ist in allen seinen Teilen urheberrechtlich geschützt. Weiterverwertungen sind ohne Zustimmung der Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung e.V. unzulässig. Das gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung in und Verarbeitung durch elektronische Systeme. © 2019, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin/Berlin Umschlaggestaltung: Hans Dung Satz: CMS der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Druck: Kern GmbH, Bexbach Printed in Germany. Gedruckt mit finanzieller Unterstützung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. ISBN: 978-3-95721-569-7 Inhaltsverzeichnis Geleitworte . 7 Vorwort . 13 Einleitung . 15 I. Gründungs- und Transformationsjahre: Die Thüringer CDU in der SBZ und frühen DDR (1945–1961) 1. Die Gründung der CDU in Thüringen . 23 2. Wandlung und Auflösung des Landesverbandes . 32 3. Im Bann der Transformation: Die CDU in den Bezirken Erfurt, Gera und Suhl bis 1961 . 46 II. Die CDU in den Bezirken Erfurt, Gera und Suhl – Eine Blockpartei im Staatssozialismus (1961–1985) 1. Die Organisation der CDU . 59 1.1. Funktion und Parteikultur der CDU . 60 1.2. Der Apparat der CDU in den Bezirken Erfurt, Gera und Suhl . 62 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports of Cases
    Report s of C ases OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL BOBEK delivered on 17 March 2016 1 Case C-592/14 European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England & Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)(United Kingdom)) (Request for a preliminary ruling — Internal market — Regulation No 1223/2009 — Article 18(1)(b) — Cosmetic products — Cosmetic ingredients — Ban on the marketing of cosmetic ingredients having been tested on animals)) Table of contents I – Introduction ................................................................................... 2 II – Legal framework ............................................................................... 3 A – EU law .................................................................................. 3 B – National law ............................................................................. 4 C – WTO law ............................................................................... 4 III – Facts, procedure and questions referred ......................................................... 5 IV – Assessment .................................................................................... 6 A – Preliminary considerations ................................................................ 6 B – Analysis of Article 18(1)(b) ............................................................... 7 1. Introduction ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Right of Self-Determination After Helsinki and Its Significance for the Baltic Nations Boris Meissner
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 13 | Issue 2 1981 The Right of Self-Determination after Helsinki and Its Significance for the Baltic Nations Boris Meissner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Boris Meissner, The Right of Self-Determination after Helsinki and Its Significance for the Baltic Nations, 13 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 375 (1981) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol13/iss2/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. The Right of Self-Determination After Helsinki and its Significance for the Baltic Nations* by Boris Meissnert I. INTRODUCTION 11HE CONFERENCE FOR Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) was concluded on August 1, 1975 with the adoption of a Final Act (the Helsinki Accords) by the 35 participating States in Helsinki.1 This Final Act has been used since then as the basis for Implementation Conferences in Belgrade and Madrid. The Accords were prefaced by a Declaration of Principles in which the right of peoples to self-determina- tion is the Eighth Principle. Its formulation corresponds to the definition of the right of self-determination in Article 1 of the two U.N. Covenants on Human Rights of December 16, 1966 which have also been ratified by most of the Communist nations, including the Soviet Union.2 The international legal nature of the right of self-determination has long been disputed.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for a New Constitutional Model for East-Central Europe
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 1991 Searching for a New Constitutional Model for East-Central Europe Rett R. Ludwikowski The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Rett. R. Ludwikowski, Searching for a New Constitutional Model for East-Central Europe, 17 SYRACUSE J. INT’L L. & COM. 91 (1991). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact edinger@law.edu. SEARCHING FOR A NEW CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL FOR EAST-CENTRAL EUROPE Rett R. Ludwikowski* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................ 92 II. CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITIONS: THE OVERVIEW ....... 93 A. Polish Constitutional Traditions .................... 93 1. The Constitution of May 3, 1791 ............... 94 2. Polish Constitutions in the Period of the Partitions ...................................... 96 3. Constitutions of the Restored Polish State After World War 1 (1918-1939) ...................... 100 B. Soviet Constitutions ................................ 102 1. Constitutional Legacy of Tsarist Russia ......... 102 2. The Soviet Revolutionary Constitution of 1918.. 104 3. The First Post-Revolutionary Constitution of 1924 ........................................... 107 4. The Stalin Constitution of 1936 ................ 109 5. The Post-Stalinist Constitution of 1977 ......... 112 C. Outline of the Constitutional History of Romania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia and Hungary ............. 114 III. CONSTITUTIONAL LEGACY: CONFRONTATION OF EAST AND W EST ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 11/6 Reading Assignment Why Is Angela Merkel in A
    11/6 Reading Assignment Why is Angela Merkel in a comfortable position compared to Peer Steinbruck? The hypothesized impact of the eurozone debt crisis and, related, Germany's eurozone role. Though Merkel represents the country's ideological right, how might her prescription for economic growth contrast with the right among American candidates for federal office? Who and what experienced the "biggest election victory " since reunification (i.e., of E. and W. Germany into one Germany)? How does the position of "party chairman" in Germany contrast with, for example, the Republican Party Chairman or Democratic Party Chairman in the United States? What is Sigmar Gabriel's job and what is his goal? What is driving the Social Democratic Party into a likely, grand coalition with the Christian Democrats? What drove the Greens and the CDU apart? Where do we see federalism (e.g., Bavaria's role) factoring into the CDU/CSU's willingness to accommodate SDP demands? What demands are those? What are Merkel's "red lines"? The significance (not just defitinition) of gerechtigkeit, particularly in light of the liberalizing labor and welfare reforms enacted a decade ago (ironically [Why "ironically"?] by the SPD-Green government. The impact of Catholic/Lutheran views on the right-of-center CDU/CSU. Can you speculate, based on this, why the FDP was ejected from parliament? How is Merkel thinking about economic inequality in terms of electoral strategy? What is a GINI coefficient? What is the trend in GINI in the east and west of the country? How does public opinion contradict the measured reality of inequality? So, how might this explain the growing fortunes of the Left and Greens at the expense of the Free Democrats? How does Germany compare to other OECD nations based on the varying New Social Maret Economy's (INSM) quality of life indicators? ------------------------------------------------------- The Boston Globe (The Boston Globe) - Clipping Loc.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 November 2018 in Bonn, Germany
    United Nations/Germany High Level Forum: The way forward after UNISPACE+50 and on Space2030 13 – 16 November 2018 in Bonn, Germany USEFUL INFORMATION FOR PARTICIPANTS Content: 1. Welcome to Bonn! ..................................................................................................................... 2 2. Venue of the Forum and Social Event Sites ................................................................................. 3 3. How to get to the Venue of the Forum ....................................................................................... 4 4. How to get to Bonn from International Airports ......................................................................... 5 5. Visa Requirements and Insurance .............................................................................................. 6 6. Recommended Accommodation ............................................................................................... 6 7. General Information .................................................................................................................. 8 8. Organizing Committe ............................................................................................................... 10 Bonn, Rhineland Germany Bonn Panorama © WDR Lokalzeit Bonn 1. Welcome to Bonn! Bonn - a dynamic city filled with tradition. The Rhine and the Rhineland - the sounds, the music of Europe. And there, where the Rhine and the Rhineland reach their pinnacle of beauty lies Bonn. The city is the gateway to the romantic part of
    [Show full text]
  • Shaken, Not Stirred: Markus Wolfâ•Žs Involvement in the Guillaume Affair
    Voces Novae Volume 4 Article 6 2018 Shaken, not Stirred: Markus Wolf’s Involvement in the Guillaume Affair and the Evolution of Foreign Espionage in the Former DDR Jason Hiller Chapman University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae Recommended Citation Hiller, Jason (2018) "Shaken, not Stirred: Markus Wolf’s Involvement in the Guillaume Affair nda the Evolution of Foreign Espionage in the Former DDR," Voces Novae: Vol. 4 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae/vol4/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Voces Novae by an authorized editor of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact laughtin@chapman.edu. Hiller: Shaken, not Stirred: Markus Wolf’s Involvement in the Guillaume A Foreign Espionage in the Former DDR Voces Novae: Chapman University Historical Review, Vol 3, No 1 (2012) HOME ABOUT USER HOME SEARCH CURRENT ARCHIVES PHI ALPHA THETA Home > Vol 3, No 1 (2012) > Hiller Shaken, not Stirred: Markus Wolf's Involvement in the Guillaume Affair and the Evolution of Foreign Espionage in the Former DDR Jason Hiller "The principal link in the chain of revolution is the German link, and the success of the world revolution depends more on Germany than upon any other country." -V.I. Lenin, Report of October 22, 1918 The game of espionage has existed longer than most people care to think. However, it is not important how long ago it started or who invented it. What is important is the progress of espionage in the past decades and the impact it has had on powerful nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan Mcmurry Western Oregon University, Kmcmurry13@Wou.Edu
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 2018 Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan McMurry Western Oregon University, kmcmurry13@wou.edu Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, Legal Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation McMurry, Keegan, "Schießbefehl and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials" (2018). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 264. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/264 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact digitalcommons@wou.edu. Schießbefehl1 and the Issues of Retroactivity Within the East German Border Guard Trials Keegan J. McMurry History 499: Senior Seminar June 5, 2018 1 On February 5th, 1989, 20-year old Chris Gueffroy and his companion, Christian Gaudin, were running for their lives. Tired of the poor conditions in the German Democratic Republic and hoping to find better in West Germany, they intended to climb the Berlin Wall that separated East and West Berlin using a ladder. A newspaper account states that despite both verbal warnings and warning shots, both young men continued to try and climb the wall until the border guards opened fire directly at them. Mr. Gaudin survived the experience after being shot, however, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherman Kent, Scientific Hubris, and the CIA's Office of National Estimates
    Inman Award Essay Beacon and Warning: Sherman Kent, Scientific Hubris, and the CIA’s Office of National Estimates J. Peter Scoblic Beacon and Warning: Sherman Kent, Scientific Hubris, and the CIA’s Office of National Estimates Would-be forecasters have increasingly extolled the predictive potential of Big Data and artificial intelligence. This essay reviews the career of Sherman Kent, the Yale historian who directed the CIA’s Office of National Estimates from 1952 to 1967, with an eye toward evaluating this enthusiasm. Charged with anticipating threats to U.S. national security, Kent believed, as did much of the postwar academy, that contemporary developments in the social sciences enabled scholars to forecast human behavior with far greater accuracy than before. The predictive record of the Office of National Estimates was, however, decidedly mixed. Kent’s methodological rigor enabled him to professionalize U.S. intelligence analysis, making him a model in today’s “post- truth” climate, but his failures offer a cautionary tale for those who insist that technology will soon reveal the future. I believe it is fair to say that, as a on European civilization.2 Kent had no military, group, [19th-century historians] thought diplomatic, or intelligence background — in fact, their knowledge of the past gave them a no government experience of any kind. This would prophetic vision of what was to come.1 seem to make him an odd candidate to serve –Sherman Kent William “Wild Bill” Donovan, a man of intimidating martial accomplishment, whom President Franklin t is no small irony that the man who did D.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation in the Different Sectors
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archive of European Integration COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 18.11.2008 SEC(2008) 2854 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT accompanying the 25th ANNUAL REPORT ON MONITORING THE APPLICATION OF COMMUNITY LAW (2007) SITUATION IN THE DIFFERENT SECTORS {COM(2008) 777 final} {SEC(2008) 2855} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY ............................................................................. 16 1.1 General introduction...................................................................................................16 1.2 Automotive Industry.................................................................................................. 17 1.2.1 Current position.......................................................................................................... 17 1.2.2 Changes underway..................................................................................................... 18 1.2.3 Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 18 1.3 Chemicals................................................................................................................... 19 1.3.1 Dangerous substances and preparations..................................................................... 19 1.3.2 Fertilizers and detergents ........................................................................................... 20 1.3.3 Drug precursors.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rasma Karklins CV
    CURRICULUM VITAE RASMA KARKLINS 2/5/2007 OFFICE ADDRESS HOME ADDRESS University of Illinois at Chicago 6166 N. Sheridan Rd., apt. 12H Department of Political Science (MC276) Chicago, Il., 60660 1007 W. Harrison USA Chicago, Il., 60607 Tel: 312-996-2396 Fax: 312-413-0440 e-mail: karklins@uic.edu FIELDS OF SPECIALIZATION Comparative Politics; East European Politics; Politics of USSR and Successor States; Transitions to Democracy; Comparative Public Policy; Corruption in Post-Communist Systems; Protest and Collective Action; Political Participation, Comparative Ethnic Relations; Citizenship and Integration, European Union Neighborhood Policy. ACADEMIC TRAINING 1975, Ph.D. Political Science, The University of Chicago 1971, M.A. International Relations, The University of Chicago 1969 “Diplom-Politologe,” Free University of Berlin, Germany ACADEMIC POSITIONS/GENERAL 1994-to date Professor of Political Science, University of Illinois at Chicago 1987-94 Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Illinois at Chicago 1980-87 Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Illinois at Chicago 1976-77 Adjunct Assistant Professor, Boston University Overseas Graduate Program in International Relations, Italy and Germany 1975-76 Assistant Professor of Political Science, Boston University ACADEMIC POSITIONS/ADMINISTRATIVE 2003-04 Associate Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago 1999-2001 Head, Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Chicago 1994-96 Chair, Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Chicago 1 AWARDS and PROFESSIONAL DISTINCTIONS 2004-05 Ed Hewett Public Policy Fellow, National Council for Eurasian and East European Research 2002-03 Visiting Member, School of Social Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 2002-02 Participant, “Honesty and Trust Project,” Collegium Budapest, Institute for Advanced Study, February 1996 Scholar in Residence, Rockefeller Center, Bellagio, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin Is the Capital of Germany and Was the Capital of the Former Kingdom of Prussia
    Berlin is the capital of Germany and was the capital of the former kingdom of Prussia. After World War II, Berlin was divided, and in 1961, the Berlin Wall was built. But the wall fell in 1989, and the country became one again in 1990. ©2015 Bonnie Rose Hudson WriteBonnieRose.com ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ©2015 Bonnie Rose Hudson WriteBonnieRose.com Cologne/is/in/a/region/of/Germany/called/the/ Rhineland./Its/biggest/and/most/famous//////// building/is/the/Cologne/Cathedral,/a/giant///// church/that/stretches/515/feet/high!/Inside///// the/church/you/can/find/many/beautiful//////// pieces/of/art,/some/more/than/500/years/old./ Cologne/is/in/a/region/of/Germany/called/the/ Rhineland./Its/biggest/and/most/famous//////// building/is/the/Cologne/Cathedral,/a/giant///// church/that/stretches/515/feet/high!/Inside///// the/church/you/can/find/many/beautiful////////
    [Show full text]