DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography I. Primary Sources A. Manuscript Collections and Government Archives Foreign Affairs Oral History Program (FAOHP), Georgetown University Washington, D.C. (copies also deposited at George C. Marshall Library) Everett Bellows (February 1989) David S. Brown (March 1989) Vincent V. Checchi (July 1990) Lincoln Gordon (January 1988) John J. Grady (August 1989) William Parks (November 1988) Melbourne Spector (December 1988) Joseph Toner (October 1989) Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. W. Averell Harriman Papers George C. Marshall Library, Lexington, Virginia Dowsley Clark Collection European Recovery Plan Commemoratives Collection William C. Foster Papers George C. Marshall Papers Marshall Plan Photograph Collection Forrest Pogue Interviews (Paul Hoffman and John McCloy) Harry B. Price Interviews (conducted 1952–54) ECA and OEEC Leland Barrows Richard M. Bissell Samuel Board Harlan Cleveland H. Van B. Cleveland John O. Coppock Glenn Craig D. A. Fitzgerald William C. Foster Theodore Geiger Lincoln Gordon W. Averell Harriman Carroll Hinman Paul Hoffman E. N. Holmgren John Lindeman Shaw Livermore Robert Marjolin Orbun V. Powell MacDonald Salter Melbourne Spector Harold Stein Donald C. Stone Allan Swim Samuel Van Hyning Greece (Americans) Michael H. B. Adler Leland Barrows Dowsley Clark John O. Coppock Helene Granby Joseph F. Heath Robert Hirschberg Paul A. Jenkins Brice M. Mace Lawrence B. Myers Walter E. Packard Paul R. Porter 163 Bibliography Greece (Americans—continued) Alan D. Strachan Edward A. Tenenbaum John O. Walker Greece (Greeks) Costa Hadjiagyras Constantin D. Tsatsos Italy (Americans) Vincent M. Barnett William E. Corfitzen Henry J. Costanzo Bartlett Harvey Thomas A. Lane Dominic J. Marcello Walter C. McAdoo Guido Nadzo Chauncey Parker Donald Simmons James Toughill Italy (Italians) Giovanni Malagodi Donato Menichella Ernesto Rossi Turkey (Americans) Clifton H. Day Leon Dayton Dewain L. Delp Russell H. Dorr Thomas Flanagan Gideon Hadary Lawrence J. Hall George McGhee Alonzo E. Taylor Irene Walker Henry W. Wiens Turkey (Turks) Cemal Bark Heyder Bey Sefik Bilkur Fuat Koprulu Ahmet Emin Yalman Bulent Yazici West Germany (Americans) F. M. Bianco Carl Bode Lucius D. Clay E. J. Epstine Michael Harris Carl R. Mahder Martin Tank Harry C. Thomas West Germany (Germans) Karl Albrecht Franz Blücher Hans W. Buttner Gunther Harkort Paul Hertz Friedrich Wesemann Harry B. Price Papers James A. Van Fleet Papers C. Tyler Wood Papers National Archives and Records Administration II, College Park, Maryland Record Group 469—Records of U.S. Foreign Assistance Agencies, 1948–61 National Agricultural Library, U.S. Department of Agriculture History Collection, Beltsville, Maryland Elmer Starch Papers 164 Bibliography National Security Archive, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. (also on web at www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/coldwar/interviews). Interviews conducted February-April 1996. Gianni Agnelli (Italy) Marianne Debouzy (France) Theodore Geiger George McGhee James Warren Mark Wyatt Harry S. Truman Library, Independence, Missouri,Oral History Collection (also on web at www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist). Economic Cooperation Administration (ECA) Richard M. Bissell (July 1971) David K. E. Bruce (March 1972) Thomas K. Finletter (January 1972) Dennis A. Fitzgerald (June 1971) Lincoln Gordon (July 17 and 22, 1975) W. Averell Harriman (1971) Hubert F. Havlik (June 1973) Paul G. Hoffman (October 1964) Milton Katz (July 1975) W. John Kenney (November 1971) Charles P. Kindleberger (July 1973) Shaw Livermore (March 1974) Organization for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC) Gerard Bauer (Switzerland, July 1970) Sir Alexander Cairncross (U.K., June 1970) Sir Frank Figgures (U.K., August 1970) Knut Getz Wold (Norway, May 1964) Sir Edmund Hall-Patch (U.K., June 1964) Robert Marjolin (France, May 1964 and July 1971) Roger Ockrent (Belgium, July 1971) Sir Eric Roll (U.K., August 1970) Baron Jean-Charles Snoy (Belgium, May 1964 and June 1970) Dirk U. Stikker (Netherlands, April 1964 and July 1970) Erik von Sydow (Sweden, July 1970) Ernst H. van der Beugel (Netherlands, June 1964) Contemporary European Officials Klas E. Book (Sweden, July 1970) Herve De Gruben (Belgium, May 1964) Per Haekkerup (Denmark, May 1964) Etienne Hirsch (France, June 1970) Thorkil Kristensen (Denmark, April 1964) Halvard M. Lange (Norway, May 1964) Jules Moch (France, April 1970) Konrad Nordahl (Norway, May 1964) Eelco van Kleffens (Netherlands, June 1964) Povl Westphall (Denmark, May 1964) Erling Wikborg (Norway, May 1964) 165 Bibliography Country Study: Greece Anthony Bernaris (April 1964) Leland Barrows (January 1971) Theodore Christidis (July 1970) Constantinos Doxiadis (May 1964) Spyros Markezinis (July 1970) John Pesmazoglu (April 1964) Paul R. Porter (November 1971) William M. Rountree (September 1989) Constantine Tsaldaris (May 1964) Country Study: Italy Giovanni Malagodi (July 1970) Franco Mattei (May 1964) Giuseppe Pella (August 1964) Country Study: Bizonia and West Germany Konrad Adenauer (June 1964) Lucius D. Clay (July 1974) Gunther Harkort (November 1970) Hans-Georg Sachs (May 1964) Gustav Adolf Sonnenhol (May 1964) Alexander Von Susskind-Schwendi (May 1964) B. Memoirs, Autobiographies, and Eyewitness Accounts Acheson, Dean G. Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department. New York, 1969. Bailey, Thomas A. The Marshall Plan Summer. Stanford, Calif., 1977. Ball, George W. The Past Has Another Pattern: Memoirs. New York, 1982. Bissell, Richard M. “European Recovery and the Problems Ahead,” Papers and Proceedings of the American Economic Association 42 (May 1952): 306–26. ———. “Foreign Aid: What Sort? How Much? How Long?” Foreign Affairs 31 (October 1952): 15–38. ———. With Jonathan E. Lewis and Frances T. Pudlo. Reflections of a Cold Warrior. New Haven, Conn., 1996. Chapter 3—“The Marshall Plan,” 30–73. Bland, Larry I., ed. George C. Marshall Interviews and Reminiscences for Forrest C. Pogue, 3d. ed. Lexington, Va., 1996. Bland, Larry I., et al., eds. The Papers of George Catlett Marshall. Baltimore, Md., 1986. Cairncross, Alexander. “The Marshall Plan.” Paper delivered at “The Marshall Plan and Its Consequences” Conference, University of Leeds, England, May 23–24, 1997. Chenery, Hollis. “Remarks,” Eastern Economic Association Meeting. Hartford, Conn., April 1977. Clayton, Will. “Is the Marshall Plan ‘Operation Rathole’?” Saturday Evening Post 222 (November 29, 1947): 26–27, 137–38. 166 Bibliography Cleveland, Harold Van B. “If There Had Been No Marshall Plan . .” in Stanley Hoffman and Charles Maier, eds., The Marshall Plan: A Retrospective. Boulder, Colo., 1984, 59–64. Dulles, Allen W. The Marshall Plan. Providence, R.I., 1993. Fox, Paula. The Coldest Winter: A Stringer in Liberated Europe. New York, 2005. Geiger, Theodore “The Lessons of the Marshall Plan for Development Today,” Looking Ahead 15 (1967): 1–4. Gordon, Lincoln. “ERP in Operation,” Harvard Business Review 27 (March 1949): 129–50. ———. “Lessons From the Marshall Plan: Successes and Limits,” in Stanley Hoffman and Charles Maier, eds., The Marshall Plan: A Retrospective (Boulder, Colo., 1984), 53–58. ———. “The Marshall Plan Legacy,” NATO Review 35 (June 1987): 14–19. ———. “Recollections of a Marshall Planner,” Journal of International Affairs 41 (Summer 1988): 233–45. Harriman, W. Averell. “The Marshall Plan: Self-Help and Mutual Aid,” Foreign Service Journal 44 (June 1967): 21. Hemsing, Albert. “The Marshall Plan’s European Film Unit, 1948–1955: A Memoir and Filmography,” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 14 (Aug- ust 1994): 269–97. Hirschman, Albert O. Crossing Boundaries. Cambridge, Mass., 1998. Chapter 2— “Fifty Years After the Marshall Plan,” 33–44. Hoffman, Paul G. “The Marshall Plan: Peace Building—Its Price and Its Profits,” Foreign Service Journal 44 (June 1967): 19–21. ————-. Peace Can Be Won. Garden City, N.Y., 1951. Kaplan, Jacob J., and Gunther Schleiminger. The European Payments Union: Financial Diplomacy in the 1950s. Oxford, U.K., 1989. Katz, Milton. “The Marshall Plan: After Twenty Years,” Foreign Service Journal 44 (June 1967): 22–26, 47. Kennan, George F. Memoirs (1925–1950). Boston, 1967. Kindleberger, Charles P. “In the Halls of the Capitol: A Memoir,” Foreign Affairs 76 (May-June 1997): 185–90. ————. “The Marshall Plan and the Cold War,” International Journal (Canada) 23 (Summer 1968): 369–81. ————. Marshall Plan Days. Boston, Mass., 1987. ————. “The Marshall Plan Seen from the United States, 1947 and 1987,” Okonomi Og Politik (Denmark) 60 (1987): 224–30. ————. “The One and Only Marshall Plan,” National Interest 11 (1988): 113–15. Levy, Walter. Oil Strategy and Politics, 1941–1981. Boulder, Colo., 1982. Marjolin, Robert. Architect of European Unity: Memoirs, 1911–1986. Trans. by William Hall. London, 1989. 167 Bibliography Marjolin, Robert. Europe and the United States in the World Economy. Durham, N.C., 1953. ———-. Le Travail d’Une Vie. Paris, 1986. Menges, Constantine, ed. The Marshall Plan From Those Who Made It Succeed. Lanham, Md., 1999. Monnet, Jean. Memoirs. Garden City, N.Y., 1978. Nitze, Paul. From Hiroshima to Glasnost: At the Center of Decision, A Memoir. New York, 1989. Porter, Paul R. “Greece’s Vital Role in the Triumph of the Democracies,” in Eugene T. Rossides, ed., The Truman Doctrine of Aid to Greece: A Fifty-Year Retrospective. New York and Washington, D.C., 1998, 170–73. Reuss, Henry S. When Government Was Good: Memoirs of a Life in Politics. Madison, Wisc., 1999. Roll, Eric. Crowded Hours. London, 1985. Rostow, Walt W. “Lessons
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Master's Theses (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin Nicholas Labinski Marquette University Recommended Citation Labinski, Nicholas, "Evolution of a President: John F. Kennedy and Berlin" (2011). Master's Theses (2009 -). Paper 104. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/104 EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN by Nicholas Labinski A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Milwaukee, Wisconsin August 2011 ABSTRACT EVOLUTION OF A PRESIDENT: JOHN F. KENNEDYAND BERLIN Nicholas Labinski Marquette University, 2011 This paper examines John F. Kennedy’s rhetoric concerning the Berlin Crisis (1961-1963). Three major speeches are analyzed: Kennedy’s Radio and Television Report to the American People on the Berlin Crisis , the Address at Rudolph Wilde Platz and the Address at the Free University. The study interrogates the rhetorical strategies implemented by Kennedy in confronting Khrushchev over the explosive situation in Berlin. The paper attempts to answer the following research questions: What is the historical context that helped frame the rhetorical situation Kennedy faced? What rhetorical strategies and tactics did Kennedy employ in these speeches? How might Kennedy's speeches extend our understanding of presidential public address? What is the impact of Kennedy's speeches on U.S. German relations and the development of U.S. and German Policy? What implications might these speeches have for the study and execution of presidential power and international diplomacy? Using a historical-rhetorical methodology that incorporates the historical circumstances surrounding the crisis into the analysis, this examination of Kennedy’s rhetoric reveals his evolution concerning Berlin and his Cold War strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 4 December, 1942 5299
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 4 DECEMBER, 1942 5299 LUXEMBURG I —MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNMENT Prime Minister M Pierre Dupong May 17, 1941 Minister of State and Minister for Foreign Affairs M Joseph Bech Minister of Labour M Pierre Kner Minister of Justice M Victor Bodson Aug 30, 1941 II —OFFICIAL STAFFS OF THE MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNMENT Under the direction of the Minister for Foreign Affairs M Andre1 Clasen M Georges Schommer Aug 30, 1941 THE NETHERLANDS I —MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNMENT Prime Minister and Minister for the Co-ordination of Warfare Professor Pieter Gerbrandy Minister for Foreign Affairs Dr Eelco van Kleffens Minister for Home Affairs and Acting Minister for General Affairs Mr Hendnk van Boeijen Minister of Education, Arts and Science Mr Gemt Bolkestem Minister of Public Works and Acting Minister of Finance Mr Johan Albarda Minister for Commerce, Industry and Shipping, and Acting Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries Mr Piet Kerstens Nov 20, 1941 Minister for Social Affairs Dr Jan van den Tempel Minister for Naval Affairs Lieutenant-Admiral Johannes Furstner Minister of Justice Dr Joannes van Angeren Minister for the Colonies Dr Hubertus van Mook May 25, 1942 Minister for War Jonkheer Otto van Lidth de Jeude Minister without Portfolio Jonkheer E Michiels van Verduynen Dec 29, 1941 Minister without Portfolio Pangeran Ano Soejono June 9, 1942 II —OFFICIAL STAFFS OF THE MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNMENT Under the direction of the Prime Minister Under the direction of the Minister for Naval Affairs Mr Berend Shngenberg Commander Jonkheer Willem Boreel
    [Show full text]
  • Our History. Germany Since 1945
    Our History. Germany since 1945 Guide through the exkhibition k k A Cordial Welcome to the Museum of Contemporary History of the Federal Republic p Our History. of Germany Germany since 1945 We invite you to tour the Permanent Exhibition – “Our History. Germany since 1945”. Spread over 4,000-plus square metres, it is a lively and up-to-date panorama of contemporary German history, with individual perspectives set in an inkternational context. It showcases original artefacts. There are many inter- active stations plus interviews with contemporary witnesses to escort you on your way from the end of the Second World War to the present. 1945 – 1949 Burden of the Past and Germany’s Division World War II, unleashed by Germany, ends with the surrender of the German armed forces on 8 May 1945. What remains is largely a traumatized and devastated country. The Allies occupy Germany and divide it into four zones. Many people are dead or missing; families are torn apart. The enormity of the Nazi crimes raises questions about accountability: Who knew, who shared the blame? But widespread public discussion doesn’t get started in Germany until the 1960s. The ravages of war and the country’s division have devastated the economy. Rationing is supposed to assure the distribution of basic supplies, but the black market is booming. In 1948 the deutschmark is introduced in the western zones, laying the groundwork for an economic upturn. The occupied zones grow apart politically and economically: In the west is born the Federal Republic of Germany, a parliamen - tary democracy; in the east the GDR, a coercive communist state modelled on the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of the United States in the Indonesian Independence Movement: 1945-1949
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of die page in tfie adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • No Cancer Foundation
    NO CANCER FOUNDATION Nazi's hijacked the Netherlands stealth to continue the Third Reich along the Benelux, Europe, America and the rest of the world with global genocide consequences. Therefore this request to all responsible on Earth and beyond, to help STOP the by Nazi hijacked Netherlands who stealth continue the Third Reich along the Benelux, Europe, America and the rest of the world with global genocide consequences. Based on the on 5 September 1944 in London falsely signed Dutch- Belgian-Luxembourg Customs Convention, the subsequent on 2 February 1958 closed Treaty, establishing of the Benelux Economic Union and declaration of the "New Benelux Treaty" done at The Hague (Nazi Netherlands) on 17 June 2008 witch all is not legally. By these the Belgian Constitutional Court ore Government are the only authority’s that can stop the on falsely treaty based global acquisition and genocide, by destroying the Benelux Treaty, they creating legal regulations to re-build a democratic Europe with independent countries based on the democratic laws before the Dutch-Belgian-Luxembourg Customs Convention. The Belgian King Leopold III saves the world and defeats posthumous Nazi Netherlands (VVD, CDA, PvdA, SGP) from which cur Nazi Europe originated. For substructure: read our registered letter (Dutch language), sent on 3 October 2012 to the Belgian Constitutional Court. One must be aware of the fact that a repetition of the mistakes that were made in the past lies again in front of us (video). The lives of millions if not billions of people will once again put in jeopardy (video), even worse as was the case in the I and II World War (video1/2/3/4).
    [Show full text]
  • More Than a Dream? Obama's Vision of A
    LÄNDERBERICHT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. USA OLIVER STUENKEL More than a dream? Juni 2009 Obama’s vision of a nuclear arms-free world www.kas.de www.kas.de/usa “Our age has stolen the fire from the plement his strategy? Most importantly, will Gods. Can we confine it to peaceful means it work? before it consumes us?” Henry Kissinger In fact, Mr. Obama's plan is not only timely, In Prague on April 5th, Barack Obama an- but also increasingly persuasive for main- nounced a drastic change in U.S. nuclear stream thinkers. Whether it will work, how- policy. It would be his goal to eliminate all ever, is another matter entirely. nuclear weapons, calling it “America’s moral responsibility” to eventually “get to zero”. OBAMA’S NUCLEAR PROBLEM His initiative received mixed reactions from President Obama's vision of a world without analysts around the world. On the one nuclear arms is not as revolutionary as it hand, optimists praised his efforts and may seem. Days after the first nuclear de- hailed Obama’s vision as a new beginning. vices were tested in New Mexico in 1945, On the other hand, pessimists called his several members of the Manhattan Project plan inadequate for a world as dangerous as formulated their desire to put the nuclear ever. genie back in the bottle. Every American President since Dwight Eisenhower has pro- The timing could not have been worse. Only claimed the objective of a world without nu- hours before the speech, North Korea’s Kim clear weapons. In 1986, Ronald Reagan and Jong Il had provided critics with ammunition Mikhail Gorbachev discussed eliminating nu- by launching a nuclear capable missile that clear weapons altogether during a meeting flew 3200 km, including over Japanese ter- in Reykjavik, causing outrage among ritory, before falling into the Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Kennedy at the Line in the Sand', from Süddeutsche Zeitung
    ‘Kennedy at the line in the sand’, from Süddeutsche Zeitung Caption: On 27 June 1963, commenting on the visit of US President, John F. Kennedy, to West Berlin the previous day, the German daily newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung considers the German question and the division of Berlin. Source: Süddeutsche Zeitung. Münchner Neueste Nachrichten aus Politik, Kultur, Wirtschaft und Sport. Hrsg. Dürrmeier, Hans ; Herausgeber Proebst, Hermann. 27.06.1963, Nr. 153; 19. Jg. München: Süddeutscher Verlag. "Kennedy am Kreidestrich", auteur:Schuster, Hans , p. 1; 2. Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/kennedy_at_the_line_in_the_sand_from_suddeutsche_zeitu ng-en-2f8118c6-c6fe-4950-8531-00285d57dcb8.html Last updated: 06/07/2016 1/3 Kennedy at the line in the sand By Hans Schuster Millions of eyewitnesses from far and near will never forget the image: the President of the United States at the Wall which has become a symbol of sorrow throughout the world — opposite him the Brandenburg Gate, draped with red flags by nervous guards. The inherent qualities of the two worlds which abut one another here in the heart of Germany could not be demonstrated more clearly. On one side: confidence — newly won after many vicissitudes — in the moral and ultimately also political superiority of freedom; on the other: fear of the ungovernable freedom virus which, amongst other things, also has the ability to pass unchecked through prohibited zones, walls and barriers.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX .A. Note on the Present Position of the Munich Agreement of 29 September 1938
    APPENDIX .A. Note on the Present Position of the Munich Agreement of 29 September 1938 THE Munich Agreement, concluded between Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Italy for the cession of the Sudeten German territory by Czecho­ slovakia, although officially dated 29 September 1938, was in reality signed in the small hours of the morning of 30 September. l To it was annexed a declaration by the British and French Governments guaranteeing the new boundaries of the Czechoslovak state against unprovoked aggression. Germany and Italy also agreed to give a similar guarantee to Czechoslovakia 'when the question of the Polish and Hungarian minorities in Czechoslovakia had been settled'. It was further declared that the problems of these minorities in Czechoslovakia, if not settled within three months by agreement between the respective Governments, 'shall form the subject of another meeting of the Heads of the Governments of the four Powers here present'. Because of its nature, the Munich Agreement was not subject to the usual forms of ratification, and no provision for such procedure was included in its text. Parliamentary approval was accorded to Mr Chamberlain and to M. Daladier, on 6 and 5 October respectively, by means of votes of confidence but by the time these had been given in the House of Commons and the Chamber of Deputies the terms of the Munich Agreement were already a fait accompli. On 2 November 1938 the German and Italian Foreign Ministers, Ribben­ trop and Ciano, handed down the First Vienna Award, which, without consultation with, or reference to, the British and French Governments, adjudicated the fate of the Polish and Hungarian minorities in Czechoslovakia, in violation of the annexe to the Munich Agreement.2 The structure set up by the Munich Agreement was destroyed on 15 March 1939 when Hitler proclaimed that 'Czechoslovakia has ceased to exist'.
    [Show full text]
  • GERMAN LANGUAGE GUIDE 1. KONRAD ADENAUER A. Dwight D
    GERMAN LANGUAGE GUIDE 1. KONRAD ADENAUER A. Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Papers as President (Ann Whitman File), International Series, Boxes 14-16 Consists of some 30 file folders. Includes social and official correspondence between Eisenhower and Adenauer, background documentation surrounding Adenauer’s visit to the United States in 1960, and memos discussing issues of joint U.S.-FRG concern. Some of Adenauer’s letters are in German with State Department translations provided. The student can report to the class on German “diplomatic language” found in Adenauer’s letters and not normally learned in the classroom and can also describe important issues facing the United States and Federal Republic of Germany during this period. B. Papers of John Foster Dulles, General Correspondence and Memoranda Series Box 1, File Folder: “Memos of Conversations General A Through D (1).” Contains memoranda of Secretary Dulles’ conversations with Adenauer on various European matters. Box 2, File Folder: “Strictly Confidential - A-B (1).” This file includes letters exchanged between Adenauer and Dulles, including letters in German plus translations. These cover relations with the Soviet Union, Germany, and other matters and reflect the close relationship between Secretary Dulles and Chancellor Adenauer. C. Papers of Eleanor Lansing Dulles, Box 13, File Folders: “Adenauer Funeral (1)-(3).” These three folders include material on the state funeral for German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, which Ms. Dulles attended. The folders contain some material in German, various schedules and itineraries of President Lyndon Johnson who attended, and newspaper clippings of the event. The student can report on religious terminology found in the funeral program and not normally studied in the classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Option Why Is There a Differentiation Between the Nuclear Energy Policy of the Netherlands and Belgium?
    The Nuclear Option Why is there a differentiation between the nuclear energy policy of the Netherlands and Belgium? Name: Bo Snier (6012558) [email protected] th Date: June 20 , 2021. MA-Thesis History oF Politics and Society: Sustainability (GKMV17023) Supervisor: Dr. Hans Schouwenburg Words: 13578 1 Abstract The usage oF nuclear energy has been the subject oF much debate in the past and in the present. Even within the European Union, the use oF nuclear energy is not without complications. For eXample, Belgium is almost dependent on the use oF nuclear energy, while it is hardly used in the Netherlands. This distinction will be analyzed in this thesis, and an attempt will be made to provide an answer to the question: Why is there a diFFerentiation between the nuclear energy policy oF the Netherlands and Belgium? This matter was answered by looking at the trend that has been going on since Second World War and evaluating the actors involved in political and social debates using available source material. These actors are the government, environmental movements, the industrial sector, and scientists, in that order. According to the Findings, there is virtually little variation between Dutch and Belgian policies. The government in the Netherlands, however, made place For environmental groups and incorporated critical voices From scientists in the decision-making process. Although the Dutch government did not Follow the recommendations one-on-one, it did result in a shiFt in policy in Belgium, where these players had little or no impact on political processes; it even appeared that most scientists supported the use oF nuclear energy.
    [Show full text]
  • The De Gaulle – Adenauer Couple and Franco-German Economic Relations During Their Time
    ȾɉȿɃɓɈɃɅɈȻɇɃɈɈɉȾɀɉɆɉɁɅɃɚɎɈɃȽɀɋɌɃɍɀɍ “ɌȽ. ɃȽȻɈɋɃɆɌɅɃ”, ɍɩɧ 52, Ɍɝ. IV, ɐɮɧɛɨɣɭɛɫɨɣɣɬɭɩɪɛɨɬɥɣɨɛɮɥɣ, 2009 ANNUAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINING AND GEOLOGY “ST. IVAN RILSKI”, Vol. 52, Part IV, Humanitarian sciences and Economics, 2009 THE DE GAULLE – ADENAUER COUPLE AND FRANCO-GERMAN ECONOMIC RELATIONS DURING THEIR TIME Ioana Panagoret “Valahia” University of Targoviste, Romania, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. General de Gaulle’s accession has marked the beginning of a new era in the Franco-German relationships and both de Gaulle and Adenauer wanted to institutionalise the idea of conciliation by means of a treaty which would be the basis of the politics of European integration. Contrary to the impressions the foreign press created, during his first visit to Colombey - les - deux – Eglises, de Gaulle succeeded to convince Adenauer regarding his devotion in reconciling the two nations, the economic union of the Six, as well as in associating England and other states onto the path of integration. The close collaboration between the two, as well as the mutual affinity did not startle since then, de Gaulle and Adenauer having in common a deep humanity, a natural noblesse of thinking and a great ability in surprising the main ideas and following some clear objectives. The relations between France and Germany shall be set forth from now on based on solid grounds and in an atmosphere which their history has never known. The Common Market was a strong stimulus of economical increase for both France and Germany, as well as for the economical cooperation between them. The period between 1958 – 1962 was marked by the doubling of the exchanges of the two countries with the C.E.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION The accession of the Federal Republic of Germany to NATO was cause for great celebration in 1955. Extending the invitation to Germany to accede to the North Atlantic Treaty was a highly symbolic expression of the hopes and aspirations of the Alliance for a renewed vision of Euro-Atlantic peace and security amidst the heated backdrop of the Cold War. To mark the 60th anniversary of this historic accession, the NATO Archives is putting the spotlight on the formal documents and ceremonies that marked Germany’s integration into the Euro-Atlantic family. Archival photos originally taken during the invitation and accession ceremonies at the Ministerial Meetings in October 1954 and May 1955, respectively, have been selected and arranged to present a unique visual record of how the Alliance came together in a spectacular public display of unity to welcome their 15th member. The NATO Archives is particularly pleased to draw from its vaults the original signed protocol of accession for Germany, reproduced here in its entirety to serve as a documentary reminder of the long-lasting commitments made by all the signatories at this historic juncture. Special thanks go to the Office of Treaty Affairs at the U.S. Department of State for providing the excellent facsimile of the original instrument of accession by Germany to the North Atlantic Treaty. This rarely seen historical document, originally deposited in Washington DC on 6 May 1955 and now preserved in the archives of the State Department, is reproduced here with the kind permission of the German Delegation to NATO. I hope the images and documents presented in the following pages help to communicate the sense of excitement, majesty and magnitude that was associated with Germany’s formal accession to NATO.
    [Show full text]