Dispositio/N 52 American Journal of Cultural Histories and Theories
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Dispositio/n 52 American Journal of Cultural Histories and Theories. Vol. XXV, No 52 LATIN AMERICAN SUBALTERN STUDIES REVISITED Gustavo Verdesio Introduction. Latin American Subaltern Studies Revisited: Is There Life After the Demise of the Group? ……………………………………………………………… 5 Ileana Rodríguez Is There a Need for Subaltern Studies?……………………………………………… 43 John Beverley Adios: A National Allegory (Some Reflections on Latin American Cultural Studies) 63 José Rabasa Colonial/Postcolonial……………………………………………………………….. 81 Sara Castro-Klarén The Recognition of Convergence: Subaltern Studies in Perspective……………….. 95 Patricia Seed How Ranajit Guha came to Latin American Subaltern Studies……………………… 107 Javier Sanjinés C. On Negation: Reflections from Andean Peasant Movements……………………….. 113 Walter Mignolo “Un paradigma otro”: colonialidad global, pensamiento fronterizo y cosmopolitan- ismo critico…………………………………………………………………………. 127 Bruno Bosteels Theses on Antagonism, Hybridity, and the Subaltern in Latin America…………… 147 Florencia Mallon Subalterns and the Nation…………………………………………………………… 159 Eduardo Mendieta Re-mapping Latin American Studies: Postcolonialism, Subaltern Studies, Post Occidentalism and Globalization Theory …………………………………………… 179 Horacio Legrás The Predicament of Cultural Studies: Subalternity and the Dialectics of the Image… 203 Ximena Sorucco On Bearded Men, Devils and Soldiers. (Post) Colonial Dramas in Peru and Bolivia 227 Bram Acosta At the Margins of History, the Nation-State and Literature: the Discourse of Com- parative Literature and Latin American Subaltern Studies…………………………... 249 Daniel Mosquera In Search of the Political within and without the Politics of Theory………………… 265 Álvaro Félix Bolaños Intelectuales, comunidades indígenas y la academia norteamericana……………… 285 Fernando Coronil Post-Obituary: We are Dead. Long Live Subaltern Studies in the Americas!……… 337 INTERVIEW Fernando Gómez About the Subaltern and Other Things. A Conversation with John Beverley.……… 343 REVIEWS Luis Fernando Restrepo. The Latin American Subaltern Studies Reader. (Ileana Rodriguez)…………………………………………………………………………… 373 Gustavo Verdesio. Thinking from the Underside of History. Enrique Dussel’s Philosophy of Liberation. (Linda Martin Alcoff and Eduardo Mendieta, Eds.)…… 383 Juan Poblete. Scenes from Postmodern Life.(Beatriz Sarlo)……………………… 389 Ana Peluffo. El taller de la escritora: Veladas literarias de Juana Manuela Gor- riti: Lima-Buenos Aires (1876/7-1892) (Graciela Battituore)……………………… 393 Ana Del Sarto.The Art of Transition. Latin American Culture and Neoliberal Cri- sis. (Francine Massiello)…………………………………………………………… 396 Laura Demaría. Mapas de poder. Una arqueología literaria del espacio argentino. (Jens Andermann) …………………………………………………………………… 401 Dispositio/n American Journal of Cultural Histories and Theories Founder: Walter D. Mignolo (Duke University) Editor: Gustavo Verdesio Managing Editor: April Caldwell Dispositio/n is published by the Spanish Section of the Department of Romance Languages and Literatures of The University of Michigan. The aim of Dispositio/n is to contribute to interdisciplinary and comparative research on semiotic practices in the colonial and post-colonial Americas. Special attention will be paid to contributions exploring issues relevant to understanding the plurilingual and multicultural realities of South and North America and the Caribbean. Dispositio/n encourages contributions dealing with verbal as well as non- verbal languages, of “popular” as well as “high” culture, of Amerindian as well as European languages and cultures. Dispositio/n also encourages theoretical and innovative approaches to research programs and teaching goals in the humanities or the human sciences. SUBSCRIPTIONS: Individuals: $30 Libraries: $30 Students: $15 CORRESPONDENCE should be sent to: Dispositio/n Department of Romance Languages 4108 MLB / 812 E. Washington Street University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1275 U.S.A. © 2005 Department of Romance Languages and Literatures, University of Michigan ISSN 0734-0591 Dispositio/n 52, vol. XXV 5 – 42 © 2005 Department of Romance Languages and Literatures, University of Michigan LATIN AMERICAN SUBALTERN STUDIES REVISITED: IS THERE LIFE AFTER THE DEMISE OF THE GROUP?* Gustavo Verdesio University of Michigan ome may ask, why bother to wonder about the fate of the Latin American Subaltern Studies (LASS) group now? Why discuss its S accomplishments and failures at this point, after two of their most prominent members have declared it defunct? Well, the answer is simple: because the collective has been one of the most influential endeavors in the fields of Latin American literary and cultural studies in the * I would like to thank some colleagues who made this issue of Dispositio/n pos- sible. First and foremost, a big thank you to Ileana Rodríguez, without whose encouragement this volume would have never seen the light of day. In numer- ous and long conversations that took place at different geographic locations (East Lansing, New Orleans, Columbus, and Ann Arbor) and by more virtual media like the phone and e-mail, she was always ready to give, candidly, her invaluable input on, and support for, this project. Next, I would like to thank my friend and colleague Fernando Coronil, for finding time to write a brilliant and inspirational piece at a time that was not the easiest for him and his family. Another big thank you to my good friend, colleague and former landlord, Gareth Williams, for his willingness to discuss anything (from subaltern stud- ies to 80s British pop, from Marxism to a certain soccer star who used to play for Manchester United) with me, with or without Scotch on the table. Thank you to my friend and colleague Javier Sanjinés, for his permanent good spirits and his great sense of humor, and for having made some time, in spite of his busy schedule and the huge pressure he was under, to contribute a very impor- tant piece to this volume. A final thank you to my personal Guru and Meiga, Cristina Moreiras-Menor, who was there all the time to support, feed and psy- choanalyze a very tired editor and friend. 6 GUSTAVO VERDESIO United States. It has been, also, a very controversial intellectual enterprise that found the strongest resistance to it among some of the most important progressive intellectuals who work in Latin America. The name calling that took place—Latin America-based scholars used words as strong as “academic imperialism” to refer to their US colleagues’ practices, while the latter called the former by such dismissive labels as “neo-Arielistas” or “neo-Criollistas”—should not stop us from analyzing the group's legacy from a calmer, more distanced perspective. This is possible, I believe, because, among other reasons, the worst of the name-calling has passed, and the time elapsed between the peak of the confrontation (the 1997 LASA conference in Guadalajara, Mexico) and the present allows us to have a more detached and productive view of the contributions of the group. When I planned this issue I thought very carefully about both its possible format and its potential contributors. I must admit that I tried to balance the need to be representative of all the tendencies that comprised the group and my personal opinions about who was influential enough to be asked to respond to a questionnaire. I finally decided to send it, also, to people who were not members of the group but who, in my opinion, could make an important contribution to the evaluation of ten years of subaltern studies presence in the field of Latin American studies: Ishita Banerjee, Saurabh Dube, Enrique Dussel and Ernesto Laclau. Unfortunately, none of them were able to send their contributions at the time of the writing of this preface. The other non-members I invited who contribute articles to this issue are Abraham Acosta, Bruno Bosteels, Horacio Legrás, Florencia Mallon, Eduardo Mendieta, Daniel Mosquera, and Ximena Sorucco. I invited some former members as well, like Gareth Williams and Alberto Moreiras, who, for different reasons, ended up not contributing to this issue. The ex-members I invited who have contributed to this volume are John Beverley, Sara Castro-Klarén, Fernando Coronil, Walter Mignolo, José Rabasa, Ileana Rodríguez, Javier Sanjinés and Patricia Seed. I also sent a questionnaire to all the participants. They were not expected to respond to all the questions: it was just a way of communicating to them what issues I was interested in seeing discussed. Here's the questionnaire: ¿Qué relaciones hay entre los estudios subalternos latinoamericanos y otras corrientes, tales como los estudios postcoloniales y los estudios LATIN AMERICAN SUBALTERN STUDIES REVISITED:... 7 culturales? ¿Qué relación podrían tener con la crítica cultural propuesta desde Latinoamérica? ¿Piensa usted que los estudios culturales y los estudios subalternos latinoamericanos son proyectos con genealogías diferentes o están conectados de alguna manera? ¿De qué manera se relacionó o se debió relacionar el subalternismo latinoamericano con el sudasiático? ¿Por que los subalternistas sudasiáticos ignoran, en general, olímpicamente a sus pares latinoamericanos? ¿Qué ventajas o desventajas tuvo, en su opinión, el formato escogido para funcionar? Es decir: fue preferible ser un grupo a ser un movimiento más abierto? ¿Qué tipo de influencia han tenido los estudios subalternos latinoamericanos en el campo de los estudios latinoamericanos en general? ¿Han pasado la barrera de los departamentos de lengua y literatura? ¿Qué