DOCSLIB.ORG

Nietzsche's Dialogic Ethic After Illusion: Rhetoric and Difference John Prellwitz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fall 2006 Nietzsche's Dialogic Ethic After Illusion: Rhetoric and Difference John Prellwitz Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Prellwitz, J. (2006). Nietzsche's Dialogic Ethic After Illusion: Rhetoric and Difference (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1062 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nietzsche’s Dialogic Ethic After Illusion: Rhetoric and Difference A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Communication & Rhetorical Studies McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by John H. Prellwitz November 20, 2006 Chair: Ronald C. Arnett, Ph.D. Reader: Richard H. Thames, Ph.D. Reader: Kathleen Glenister Roberts, Ph.D. Copyright ii Preface Acknowledgements The thanks I mention here merely begin to describe the debts I owe to those who helped to enable my completion of the Ph.D. Program in Rhetoric at Duquesne University: I wish to thank Cindy Burke and Jane Gardner for all their kindness, understanding and support. Duquesne University for the funding of my graduate assistantship that allowed me to complete my studies at a University campus, graduate college, and in a department committed to education for the mind, heart, and spirit. To my many colleagues whose conversations and questions sparked illumination and offered guidance in innumerable ways, thank you. There is not space to mention them all but I wish to briefly name a few. To Marie Baker-Ohler and Melissa Cook for everything. Your friendship I keep close as a treasured gift I hope I show you both how much that means to me always. To Cem for your faithful and enduring friendship and spark of Mediterranean intellect and humor, thank you. The faculty in the Department of Communication & Rhetorical Studies at Duquesne University: Dr. Janie M. Harden Fritz, for her boundless energy, alacrity, and her spiritual grace in everyday living, thank you. I will never forget your fateful welcoming of me into the department and always cherish your continued concern and support. Dr. Calvin L. Troup, for his commitment to the values and ideals of an ethical life, thank you. His family and scholarship serve as testament to his faith and commitment to his family and the Ph.D. program. His decision to take a risk on me and providing opportunity to teach at Duquesne I will always appreciate and turn to as the foundation of my vocation as a professor and scholar. My dissertation committee: Dr. Richard H. Thames, a professor who never failed to ‘got ideas.’ Our conversations and the courses I took from you never failed to spark new questions and inspire learning. For your commitment to the humanities in your teaching and living, I am thankful for the continuing opportunities to learn more of how Burke, Aristotle, and naturalism texture our world. Dr. Kathleen Glenister Roberts, a comrade who entered the department at a similar time and with similar narrative commitments. Thank you for all the laughter and scholarly insight into how to live out Catholic ideals as a professor, scholar, and colleague. iii Dr. Ronald C. Arnett, a mentor who took me headlong into the twisting turns of scholarly writing, teaching, and living. Your example in meeting difficulty will always remain with me as a powerful testament to what wisdom means in living through the mud and mystery of everyday. Thank you for guiding me to questions that spark a life of discovery. For your guidance and considerate burdening, I am thankful and hope I may in some small help to carry on the dialogue your teaching and scholarship has inspired in me and all those willing to listen through the jokes. The laughter and inspiration you bring resonates through your faith and understanding with family, friends, colleagues, and students and others within and without the University community. I am most grateful for meeting you and for the continuing opportunity to learn with you as mentor and friend. I wish now to turn to thank those who have made me who I am and helped to make each day a gift. To my father for leaving me a living example of goodness, I will always await our next encounter and hopefully in some small way I may warm your spirit in my best moments. To my mother, I thank you for showing me how to make life meaningful. Your accomplishments are many but I am always most moved by your gentle heart and tenderness in comforting and brightening troubling times. Thank you for all you are and for setting such a faithful and strong example for what it means to be a good and faithful person. To my sister for her sense of humor and loving unique way, your life never ceases to surprise and inspire me to be more, thank you. To my grandparents, John and Rose Stefansky, for opening your home and hearts to us in a time of sadness, thank you. I will always be thankful for those times and adventures we shared and the laughter and love that helped to make our new house a home. I am proud to carry you in our shared memories forward each day. To Christine for all the reasons you are such a special gift to me, thank you. To all of those mentioned and kept dear to my heart, thank you. iv Abstract What is the nature of the relationship between communication ethics and rhetoric? How may study of the interplay between dialogue as a communication ethic and ground of rhetoric contribute to greater understanding and constructive meeting of the narrative and virtue contention that characterizes the contemporary postmodern historical moment? A prominent alleged source of postmodern value contention and a neglected source for advancing the study of the interpenetration of ethics and rhetoric, Friedrich Nietzsche, as a novel hermeneutic entry to engage these questions and demarcates the fields of inquiry this study addresses. The present work begins with meeting the contemporary historical moment characterized by metanarrative disintegration. With metanarrative disintegration, difference and multiplicity are now privileged. The privileging of difference communicates a turn to dialogue rather than the modern bias towards telling in shaping communicative activity. Meeting the alterity within the temporal existential moment occurs through the operative of metaphor. Levinas’ focus on the dialogic tension between saying and said displays the manner in which meeting emerges to offer temporal ground. The multiplicity of ways meanings emerge to offer temporal ground become realized through the imbricating architectonic Nietzschean metaphors of perspectivism, genealogy, and revaluation of values, producing a dialogic ethic of meeting. This outcome interprets otherwise the work, as Levinas also does, of whom many consider the founder of deconstruction, Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche’s dialogic ethic displays the ongoing interplay of recognition of decaying said and the ongoing hope in the saying as meeting. v Table of Contents Chapter One Nietzsche’s Dialogic Ethic Meeting Metanarrative Disintegration 1 Chapter Two Deconstructing Nietzsche’s Thought within Rhetorical Studies 25 Chapter Three Hermeneutic Background for Interpreting Nietzsche Otherwise 56 Chapter Four Nietzsche’s Perspectivism as Ground of Dialogic Meeting 96 Chapter Five Nietzsche’s Genealogy as Rhetorical Deconstruction 126 Chapter Six Nietzsche’s Epideictic Revaluation of Values 154 Chapter Seven Nietzsche’s Dialogic Ethic After Illusion: Dialogic Meeting 182 Bibliography 194 vi Prellwitz, Chapter One 1 Chapter One: Nietzsche’s Dialogic Ethic Meeting Metanarrative Disintegration The present study articulates a communication ethic that constructively engages difference that drives contemporary narrative and virtue contention in an age after metanarrative disintegration. The ground for this constructive communication ethic arises from interpreting otherwise one of the subterranean springs of our contemporary postmodern historical moment, Friedrich Nietzsche. Dialogue serves as the alternative hermeneutic entrance taken into Nietzsche’s work rather than engaging his writings from the standard deconstructive bias. The present work argues that dialogue, not the monologic, mechanistic unmasking of indeterminacy within texts of human language, animates Nietzsche’s architectonic rhetoric of his communication ethic. Dialogue and rhetoric are viewed as united through their primary interpenetrating function, the disclosure and articulation of meaning, meaning communicable through whatever form the temporal, existential situation avails, through word, gesture, or act, for example. Approached from this dialogic perspective, the meeting of difference embedded in competing values, morals, and traditions affords opportunities for questioning, interpretation, criticism, judgment, and action, the recurring interplay of dialogue and rhetoric that simultaneously gives meaning to our words and deeds. Opportunities discovered through interpreting otherwise Nietzsche’s metaphors of perspectivism, genealogy, and revaluation of values then reveal the architectonic rhetoric of a constructive communication ethic, dialogic meeting. Dialogic meeting, the articulation
Recommended publications
  • Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period

    Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period

    Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period This volume is an investigation of how Augustine was received in the Carolingian period, and the elements of his thought which had an impact on Carolingian ideas of ‘state’, rulership and ethics. It focuses on Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims, authors and political advisers to Charlemagne and to Charles the Bald, respectively. It examines how they used Augustinian political thought and ethics, as manifested in the De civitate Dei, to give more weight to their advice. A comparative approach sheds light on the differences between Charlemagne’s reign and that of his grandson. It scrutinizes Alcuin’s and Hincmar’s discussions of empire, rulership and the moral conduct of political agents during which both drew on the De civitate Dei, although each came away with a different understanding. By means of a philological–historical approach, the book offers a deeper reading and treats the Latin texts as political discourses defined by content and language. Sophia Moesch is currently an SNSF-funded postdoctoral fellow at the University of Oxford, working on a project entitled ‘Developing Principles of Good Govern- ance: Latin and Greek Political Advice during the Carolingian and Macedonian Reforms’. She completed her PhD in History at King’s College London. Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period Political Discourse in Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims Sophia Moesch First published 2020 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation.
  • Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM

    Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM

    Philosophy Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:01 PM Western Pre-Socratics Fanon Heraclitus- Greek 535-475 Bayle Panta rhei Marshall Mcluhan • "Everything flows" Roman Jakobson • "No man ever steps in the same river twice" Saussure • Doctrine of flux Butler Logos Harris • "Reason" or "Argument" • "All entities come to be in accordance with the Logos" Dike eris • "Strife is justice" • Oppositional process of dissolving and generating known as strife "The Obscure" and "The Weeping Philosopher" "The path up and down are one and the same" • Theory about unity of opposites • Bow and lyre Native of Ephesus "Follow the common" "Character is fate" "Lighting steers the universe" Neitzshce said he was "eternally right" for "declaring that Being was an empty illusion" and embracing "becoming" Subject of Heideggar and Eugen Fink's lecture Fire was the origin of everything Influenced the Stoics Protagoras- Greek 490-420 BCE Most influential of the Sophists • Derided by Plato and Socrates for being mere rhetoricians "Man is the measure of all things" • Found many things to be unknowable • What is true for one person is not for another Could "make the worse case better" • Focused on persuasiveness of an argument Names a Socratic dialogue about whether virtue can be taught Pythagoras of Samos- Greek 570-495 BCE Metempsychosis • "Transmigration of souls" • Every soul is immortal and upon death enters a new body Pythagorean Theorem Pythagorean Tuning • System of musical tuning where frequency rations are on intervals based on ration 3:2 • "Pure" perfect fifth • Inspired
  • Natural Law and Modern Jurisprudence Joseph V

    Natural Law and Modern Jurisprudence Joseph V

    Document généré le 1 oct. 2021 06:45 Laval théologique et philosophique Natural Law and Modern Jurisprudence Joseph V. Dolan Volume 15, numéro 1, 1959 URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1019972ar DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1019972ar Aller au sommaire du numéro Éditeur(s) Laval théologique et philosophique, Université Laval ISSN 0023-9054 (imprimé) 1703-8804 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Dolan, J. V. (1959). Natural Law and Modern Jurisprudence. Laval théologique et philosophique, 15(1), 32–63. https://doi.org/10.7202/1019972ar Tous droits réservés © Laval théologique et philosophique, Université Laval, Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des 1959 services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l’Université de Montréal, l’Université Laval et l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. https://www.erudit.org/fr/ Natural Law and Modern Jurisprudence I. LAW AND THE FORMATION OF THE CITIZEN 1. The influence of the community It is almost with surprise that we remark in theEthics, where Aristotle is preparing his transition to thePolitics, the important and even critical role he assigns to law in the formation of virtue.1 It is our habit to think of law as occupied with ends more immediate and pedestrian like monitoring traffic, taxing our cigarettes, and suppressing violence.
  • A Study of Musical Rhetoric in JS Bach's Organ Fugues

    A Study of Musical Rhetoric in JS Bach's Organ Fugues

    A Study of Musical Rhetoric in J. S. Bach’s Organ Fugues BWV 546, 552.2, 577, and 582 A document submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF MUSICAL ARTS in the Keyboard Division of the College-Conservatory of Music March 2015 by Wei-Chun Liao BFA, National Taiwan Normal University, 1999 MA, Teachers College, Columbia University, 2002 MEd, Teachers College, Columbia University, 2003 Committee Chair: Roberta Gary, DMA Abstract This study explores the musical-rhetorical tradition in German Baroque music and its connection with Johann Sebastian Bach’s fugal writing. Fugal theory according to musica poetica sources includes both contrapuntal devices and structural principles. Johann Mattheson’s dispositio model for organizing instrumental music provides an approach to comprehending the process of Baroque composition. His view on the construction of a subject also offers a way to observe a subject’s transformation in the fugal process. While fugal writing was considered the essential compositional technique for developing musical ideas in the Baroque era, a successful musical-rhetorical dispositio can shape the fugue from a simple subject into a convincing and coherent work. The analyses of the four selected fugues in this study, BWV 546, 552.2, 577, and 582, will provide a reading of the musical-rhetorical dispositio for an understanding of Bach’s fugal writing. ii Copyright © 2015 by Wei-Chun Liao All rights reserved iii Acknowledgements The completion of this document would not have been possible without the help and support of many people.
  • The Structure of the Virtues a Study of Thomas Aquinas’S and Godfrey of Fontaines’S Accounts of Moral Goodness

    The Structure of the Virtues a Study of Thomas Aquinas’S and Godfrey of Fontaines’S Accounts of Moral Goodness

    Alexander Stöpfgeshoff The Structure of the Virtues A Study of Thomas Aquinas’s and Godfrey of Fontaines’s Accounts of Moral Goodness Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Sal VIII, Universitetshuset, Biskopsgatan 3, 753 10, Uppsala, Monday, 10 September 2018 at 14:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor Bonnie Kent (The Department of Philosophy, UC Irvine). Abstract Stöpfgeshoff, A. 2018. The Structure of the Virtues. A Study of Thomas Aquinas’s and Godfrey of Fontaines's Accounts of Moral Goodness. 173 pp. Uppsala: Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University. ISBN 978-91-506-2713-8. This dissertation is a study of Thomas Aquinas’s (1225–1274) and Godfrey of Fontaines’s (d. 1306) moral philosophies. In this study, I conduct a detailed analysis of two Aristotelian commitments concerning the character virtues, namely, The Plurality of the Character Virtues and The Connection of the Character Virtues. Both Aquinas and Godfrey think that there are many distinct character virtues (such as moderation and justice), however, one cannot (perfectly) possess these character virtues in separation from each other. In Chapter I, it is established that Aquinas believes in the plurality of the character virtues not because of a specific account of the human soul, but because he is committed to a plurality in what he calls “the notion of goodness.” In Chapter II, it is argued that Aquinas’s account of virtuous action requires that there be a likeness between a person and their actions in terms of the notion of goodness explored in Chapter I.
  • AUGUSTINE on SUFFERING and ORDER: PUNISHMENT in CONTEXT by SAMANTHA ELIZABETH THOMPSON a Thesis Submitted in Conformity With

    AUGUSTINE on SUFFERING and ORDER: PUNISHMENT in CONTEXT by SAMANTHA ELIZABETH THOMPSON a Thesis Submitted in Conformity With

    AUGUSTINE ON SUFFERING AND ORDER: PUNISHMENT IN CONTEXT BY SAMANTHA ELIZABETH THOMPSON A Thesis Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Toronto © Samantha Elizabeth Thompson 2010 Augustine on Suffering and Order: Punishment in Context Samantha Elizabeth Thompson Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Augustine of Hippo argues that all suffering is the result of the punishment of sin. Misinterpretations of his meaning are common since isolated statements taken from his works do give misleading and contradictory impressions. This dissertation assembles a comprehensive account of Augustine’s understanding of the causes of suffering to show that these views are substantive and internally consistent. The argument of the dissertation proceeds by confronting and resolving the apparent problems with Augustine’s views on sin and punishment from within the broader framework of his anthropology and metaphysics. The chief difficulty is that Augustine gives two apparently irreconcilable accounts of suffering as punishment. In the first, suffering is viewed as self-inflicted because sin is inherently self-damaging. In the second, God inflicts suffering in response to sin. This dissertation argues that these views are united by Augustine’s concern with the theme of ‘order.’ The first account, it argues, is actually an expression of Augustine’s doctrine that evil is the privation of good; since good is for Augustine synonymous with order, we can then see why he views all affliction as the concrete experience of disorder brought about by sin. This context in turn allows us to see that, by invoking the ii notion of divinely inflicted punishment in both its retributive and remedial forms, Augustine wants to show that disorder itself is embraced by order, either because disorder itself must obey laws, or because what is disordered can be reordered.
  • Literature and Ethics

    Literature and Ethics

    Literature and Ethics LIVERPOOL HOPE UNIVERSITY STUDIES IN ETHICS SERIES SERIES EDITOR : DR. DAVID TOREVELL SERIES DEPUTY EDITOR : DR. JACQUI MILLER VOLUME ONE : ENGAGING RELIGIOUS EDUCATION Editors: Joy Schmack, Matthew Thompson and David Torevell with Camilla Cole VOLUME TWO : RESERVOIRS OF HOPE : SUSTAINING SPIRITUALITY IN SCHOOL LEADERS Author: Alan Flintham VOLUME THREE : LITERATURE AND ETHICS : FROM THE GREEN KNIGHT TO THE DARK KNIGHT Editors: Steve Brie and William T. Rossiter Literature and Ethics: From the Green Knight to the Dark Knight Edited by Steve Brie and William T. Rossiter Literature and Ethics: From the Green Knight to the Dark Knight, Edited by Steve Brie and William T. Rossiter This book first published 2010 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2010 by Steve Brie and William T. Rossiter and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-2288-4, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-2288-6 In memory of Katie Elizabeth Edge What was it about her that without her The world grew dull? (Brian Patten, “Her Ghost”) CONTENTS Introduction: “Distinct but Separate?”.........................................................1 “Substituting Earth for God?”: Ethics and the Recognition of Specific Place in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight and The Secret Garden.........
  • Syllabus-PHIL 115.Docx

    Syllabus-PHIL 115.Docx

    Syllabus Code: PHIL 115 Title: Introduction to Philosophy Institute: Business and Social Department: Philosophy Sciences Course Description: Students investigate key issues in philosophy, including the nature of self, knowledge and truth, freedom and determinism, morality, the nature of the universe, the existence of God, death and afterlife, meaning and purpose. Emphasis will be given to clarifying students’ own thinking on these issues through reading, reflection, and discussion. Prerequisites: READ 092, READ 095 or passing score Accuplacer test. Corequisites: Prerequisites or Corequisites: Credits: 3 Lecture Hours: 3 Lab/Studio Hours: Required Textbook/Materials: Philosophy: An Introduction to the Art of Wondering, James L. Christian, (Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth, 2016), 11th ed. N.B. For students taking the Distance Education (online) or Honors section, see the course addenda for those sections, obtainable from the Philosophy Department or instructor. Additional Time Requirements: For information on Brookdale’s policy on credit hour requirements and outside class student work refer to Academic Credit Hour Policy. See course/instructor section addendum. Course Learning Outcomes: Upon successful completion of this course, as demonstrated through the writing of essay test questions and a summary/analysis report on primary source readings, the student will be able to: • describe and analyze the basic problems of philosophy in the areas of epistemology, metaphysics and ethics (HU) (E) • summarize philosophers’ solutions to the problems of philosophy in the areas of epistemology, metaphysics and ethics (HU) (E) • summarize the arguments of and critically analyze opposing views on a philosophical issue (HU) (E) • develop and defend their own opinions on basic philosophical issues (HU) (E) Learning Outcome(s) support the following General Education Knowledge Areas: • (HU) Humanities • (E) Ethical Reasoning and Action Spring 2020 Syllabus What is philosophy? Philosophy is the love of wisdom.
  • Copyright © 2014 John Daniel Mcdonald

    Copyright © 2014 John Daniel Mcdonald

    Copyright © 2014 John Daniel McDonald All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. TOWARD A BAPTIST VIEW OF METAPHILOSOPHY: AN ANALYSIS OF E. Y. MULLINS, JOHN NEWPORT, RICHARD CUNNINGHAM, AND L. RUSS BUSH A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by John Daniel McDonald May 2014 APPROVAL SHEET TOWARD A BAPTIST VIEW OF METAPHILOSOPHY: AN ANALYSIS OF E. Y. MULLINS, JOHN NEWPORT, RICHARD CUNNINGHAM, AND L. RUSS BUSH John Daniel McDonald Read and Approved by: ____________________________________________ Theodore J. Cabal (Chair) ____________________________________________ Michael A. G. Haykin ____________________________________________ James Parker III Date________________________________ To Angie McDonald, whose sacrifice and support made this dissertation possible; to Maddie, Libby, and Emma, whose patience and understanding are beyond their years; to Charles and Shelly McDonald, who instilled in me a love of the Lord and of learning; and to Ted Cabal, who first introduced me to philosophy and its value for the service of Christian theology. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... VIII PREFACE ....................................................................................................................
  • Origins of Public Speaking Chapter 2

    Origins of Public Speaking Chapter 2

    www.publicspeakingproject.org origins of public speaking chapter 2 By: Peter A. DeCaro, Ph.D. University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK introduction chapter outline: The art of public speaking was practiced chapter objectives: • Introduction long before the Greeks wrote about it in After reading this chapter, you should be • Ancient Greece their treatises more than 2,500 years able to: o The Rise of Democracy ago. For Greek men, it was a way of o The Nature of Rhetoric life, a way of being, just like football 1. Identify the historical events that o Dialectics and Logic and baseball are to us today. We led up to democracy and the o The Rhetorical Approach attribute today’s field of communication recognition of persuasion and • The Roman Republic’s Adoption to the ancient Greeks because they were public speaking as art forms in of Rhetoric the first to systematize the art of public Athens, Greece. o Cicero’s Influence Quintillion’s Influence speaking, which they called “rhetoric.” 2. Describe the nature of public o speaking in Athens during the 5th • The Middle Ages The art, or use of public speaking, is century B.C. and the role it o St. Augustine quite different today than when it was played in a democratic society. o Christianity practiced by the Greeks, and then the 3. Apply Plato’s approach to • The Renaissance Romans. Theirs was a time that didn’t dialectics and logic. o The Humanists The Rationalists have multimedia - television, radio, 4. Explain Aristotle’s descriptions of o • The Modern Period internet, movies, newspapers, and the rhetoric and public speaking.
  • Arrangement (Dispositio Or Taxis) Concerns How One Orders Speech Or Writing

    Arrangement (Dispositio Or Taxis) Concerns How One Orders Speech Or Writing

    Cicero’s Six Steps in Arranging a Persuasive Speech Arrangement (dispositio or taxis) concerns how one orders speech or writing. In ancient rhetoric, arrangement referred solely to the order to be observed in an oration, but the term has broadened to include all considerations of the ordering of discourse, especially on a large scale. 1. Introduction: 2. Statement of Facts: 3. Division: 4. Proof: 1. 2. 3. 5. Refutation: 6. Conclusion Cicero aligned certain rhetorical appeals with specific parts of the oration. In the exordium or introduction, it is necessary for one to establish his or her own authority. Therefore, one employs ethical appeals (see ethos). In the next four parts of the oration (statement of facts, division, proof, and refutation), one chiefly employs logical arguments (see logos). In the conclusion, one finishes up by employing emotional appeals (see pathos). Introduction (Exordium): The introduction of a speech, where one announces the subject and purpose of the discourse, and where one usually employs the persuasive appeal of ethos in order to establish credibility with the audience. Ethos names the persuasive appeal of one's character, especially how this character is established by means of the speech or discourse. Aristotle claimed that one needs to appear both knowledgeable about one's subject and benevolent. (Silvae Rhetoricae) Statement of Facts (Narratio): The speaker here provides a narrative account of what has happened and generally explains the nature of the case. Division (Partitio): Following In this section of the oration, the speaker outlines what will follow, in accordance with what's been stated as the stasis, or point at issue in the case.
  • Law and Language: an Historical and Critical Introduction

    Law and Language: an Historical and Critical Introduction

    Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law LARC @ Cardozo Law Articles Faculty 1984 Law and Language: An Historical and Critical Introduction Peter Goodrich Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter Goodrich, Law and Language: An Historical and Critical Introduction, 11 Journal of Law & Society 173 (1984). Available at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/333 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty at LARC @ Cardozo Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of LARC @ Cardozo Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. JOURNAL OF LAW & SOCIETY VOLUME I I, NUMBER 2, SUMMER 1984 0263-323 X $3.00 Law and Language: An Historical and Critical Introduction t PETER GOODRICH* I. INTRODUCTION Despite the glaringly obvious fact that both legal theory and legal practice are, and have always been, heavily dependent upon the tools of rhetorical and linguistic analysis, no coherent or systematic account of the relation­ ship of law to language has ever been achieved. Even worse, the occasional exercises that modern jurisprudence has conducted in the direction of normative linguistics, in studying the "grammar" of law, or the philosophy of ordinary language, in outlining the semantics of rule application, have been exercises aimed at asserting or defending the positivistic view that law is an internally defined "system" of notional meanings or legal values, that it is a technical language and is by and large, unproblematically, univocal in its application.