Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) LATVIA
Year 2014 - Level 1
DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET
LSSIP for Latvia
Infocentre Reference: 15/01/12-23
Document Identifier Edition: Year 2014
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia Edition Date: 19/06/2015
LSSIP Focal Point - Erika NEIMANE E-mail: Head of ATM [email protected] Section
LSSIP Contact Person - Luca DELL’ ORTO E-mail: Unit DPS/PEPR [email protected]
Status Intended for
Working Draft General Public
Draft Agency Stakeholders
Proposed Issue Restricted Audience
Released Issue
Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)
Path: Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Latvia (LV) - LDO\Year 2014\Released\LSSIP Year 2014 LV Released.doc
LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material 2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2013 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr 3 ESSIP Report 2012 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr 4 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor 5 Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries 6 European ATM Master Plan https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ 7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip 8 AIP of Latvia https://ais.lgs.lv/Latvian%20eAIP 9 FAB Performance Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/ses-performance-scheme-reference-period-1- 2012-2014
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia Released issue
APPROVAL SHEET
The following authorities have approved all parts of LSSIP Year 2014 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European Single Sky ImPlementation (ESSIP) Plan – Edition 2014.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia Released issue
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ...... 1 Introduction ...... 4 Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ...... 5 1.1 Geographical Scope ...... 5 1.1.1 International Membership ...... 5 1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) ...... 5 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ...... 6 1.2 National Stakeholders ...... 6 1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) ...... 7 1.2.2 Air Navigation Service Provider ...... 8 1.2.3 Airports ...... 9 1.2.4 Military Authorities ...... 9 Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity ...... 12 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Latvia ...... 12 2.2 RIGA ACC ...... 13 2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ...... 13 2.2.2 Summer 2014 performance ...... 13 2.2.3 Planning Period 2014-2018/19 - Summer ...... 13 Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ...... 15 Chapter 4 - National Projects ...... 16 Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ...... 19 5.1 FAB Co-ordination ...... 19 5.2 FAB Projects ...... 20 5.3 Regional cooperation ...... 21 5.3.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives ...... 21 5.3.2 Regional Projects ...... 22 Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ...... 25 6.1 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress ...... 26 6.2 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ...... 37
ANNEXES Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia Released issue
Executive Summary
National ATM Context Free route airspace (North European Free Route Airspace - NEFRA) is planned to be implemented in November 2015 along with the NEFAB and Swedish/Danish FAB. Implementation of free route airspace is expected to bring operational, environmental and cost benefits.
Traffic and Capacity Latvia has completed or plans to complete in the required time frame majority of the objectives, including implementation of free route airspace in November 2015. A couple of objectives pertaining to implementation of upgraded versions of the ground safety nets are under consideration and would be included in the planning process during 2016, based on the availability of appropriate specifications.
ESSIP Objective Implementation Based on the 2014 ESSIP Objective implementation data in Latvia, overall implementation of the ESSIP Objectives is either in planning phase or completed. The following objectives have yet to be completed: COM10 and NAV03 by the end of 2016, FCM01 SAF10 by the end 2015. Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes of the ITY-COTR objective is planned to be completed on time in 2015.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 1 Released issue
* FOC Date LSSIP 2014 - Latvia █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)
State-related ESSIP Objectives 2014 2015 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 <=2008 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air [IDP] AOM13.1 Traffic (GAT) handling [E] * [IDP] AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [E] * [IDP] AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [E] * AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions [IDP] * Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict ATC02.2 [E] Alert (STCA) - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity ATC02.5 [E] Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe ATC02.6 [E] Altitude Warning - level 2 * Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path ATC02.7 [E] Monitor - level 2 * ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools [E] * Implement automated support for conflict detection and ATC12 [E] conformance monitoring * Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange [IDP] ATC15 mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic [E] * AMAN operations ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 * Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller [IDP] ATC17 during Coordination and Transfer [E] * Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks COM09 [IDP] or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) * COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS * Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in COM11 ATM * FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services [E] * [IDP] FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [E] * [IDP] FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 [E] [IDP] FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [E] * INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) * ITY-ACID Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical ITY-ADQ [E] information * [IDP] ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [E] * Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements ITY-AGVCS2 below FL195 * Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination ITY-COTR [E] processes * ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability * NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV [E] * [IDP] NAV10 Implement APV procedures [E] *
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 2 Released issue * FOC Date LSSIP 2014 - Latvia █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table) Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations SAF10 caused by airspace infringements * SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions * Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory SRC-RLMK Requirements (ESARRs) SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies
Airport-related ESSIP Objectives
2014 2015 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 <=2008
EVRA-Riga Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and AOP04.1 [E] Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 * Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and AOP04.2 Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 * [IDP] AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [E] * Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) ENV01 [IDP] techniques for environmental improvements * Implement Collaborative Environmental Management ENV02 (CEM) at Airports *
Understanding the Table
Objective Completed No Plan
Objective Partly Completed Missing Data
Objective Planned Not Applicable (Latvia/Riga Airport does not participate in this obj.)
Late
E= Essential – Master Plan Reference IDP = Interim Deployment Programme
NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 3 Released issue
Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document – Year 2014 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2014.
The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.
Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;
Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;
Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;
Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;
Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.
Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.
Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 4 Released issue Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment
1.1 Geographical Scope
1.1.1 International Membership Latvia is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since ECAC 1993 EUROCONTROL 1 January, 2011 European Union 1 May, 2004 EASA 1 May, 2004 ICAO 13 July, 1992 NATO 1 May, 2004 ITU 29 March, 2004
1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the RIGA FIR. RIGA FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 5 States, namely Estonia, Russian Federation, Belarus, Lithuania and Sweden. Adjacent FIR/UIRs of ECAC States: North - Tallinn FIR/UIR (Estonia); West - Malmö and Stockholm FIRs/UIRs (Sweden); South - Vilnius FIR/UIR (Lithuania). Adjacent FIR/UIRs of non-ECAC States: East - Sankt-Peterburg FIR/UIR (Russian Federation); Southeast - Minsk FIR/UIR (Belarus)
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 5 Released issue 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation The current classification of Latvian airspace is outlined below: FIR: GND - UNL RIGA CTA: FL 095 - FL 460
1.2 National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Latvia are the following: • National Supervisory Authorities: - The Department of Air Transport of the Ministry of Transport (MoT); - Civil Aviation Agency of Latvia (LCAA); • Transport Accident and Incident Investigation Bureau; • Air Navigation Services Provider State Joint Stock Company “Latvijas Gaisa Satiksme” (LGS); • Riga International Airport; • The Ministry of Defence (MoD) National Armed Forces; • The Ministry of Internal Affairs (Border Guard). Their activities are detailed in the following sub-chapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 6 Released issue
1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)
1.2.1.1 General information Civil Aviation in Latvia is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The LCAA is further detailed in the following sections.
Activity in ATM: Organisation Legal Basis responsible Rule-making Cabinet of Ministers Constitution Safety Oversight LCAA Law on Aviation Enforcement actions in case of LCAA Law on Aviation non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements Airspace LCAA Law on Aviation , Cabinet of Ministers regulation N° 507(28.06.2011.) Economic Department of Law on Aviation , Air Transport (MoT) Cabinet of Ministers regulation N° 991 (5.12.2006.) Environment LCAA Law on Aviation , Cabinet of Ministers regulation N° 487 (20.06.2006.) and N° 1041 (27.12.2005) Security LCAA Law on Aviation , Cabinet of Ministers regulation N° 397 (27.04.2010.) Accident investigation Transport Accident and Law on Aviation , Investigation Bureau Law on accident and incident investigation in civil aviation
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 7 Released issue
1.2.1.2 Department of Air Transport of the MoT and LCAA According to the act “Law on Aviation”, the Department of Air Transport of the Ministry of Transport and Civil Aviation Agency of Latvia (LCAA) implement State policy and exercise State administration in the field of civil aviation. As per SES regulations the Department of Air Transport together with LCAA, were nominated as the National Supervisory Authorities (NSA). Both organizations are responsible for certification of the air navigation services providers in Latvia. LCAA is responsible for safety supervision and approves/certifies/licenses staff, operations and equipment of service provider organisations. Both bodies are institutionally separated from the service providers. The LCAA is an independent governmental Agency subordinated to the Ministry of Transport. LCAA operates as a non-profit organisation, financed from fees from aviation enterprises.
Annual Report published: Y http://www.caa.lv/upload/userfiles/files/Publiskais_p%C4%81rskats2013.pdf http://www.caa.lv/upload/userfiles/files/Drosibas_parskats_par_2013_gadu. pdf
More detailed information is available on the following web sites: - The Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Latvia: http://www.sam.gov.lv - Civil Aviation Agency of Latvia: http://www.caa.lv LCAA Organisational Chart is presented in Annex B.
1.2.2 Air Navigation Service Provider
Name of the ANSP: Latvijas Gaisa Satiksme (LGS) Governance: Ministry of Transport Ownership: 100% State Services provided Y/N Comment ATC en-route Y ATC approach Y ATC Aerodrome(s) Y AIS Y CNS Y MET Y LGS is responsible for the meteo observations at the airports only. ATCO training Y Unit Training (Transitional; Pre-On the Job Training and On the Job Training); Continuation Training (Refresher; Emergency and Conversion); Other training for ATM staff (Development Training; Classroom Instructors and ATM Management Staff Training). Others Y FIS/AFIS (provided by Liepaja FIC in Western part of FIR) Alerting Services; Pre-tactical and tactical airspace management. Additional information: Provision of services in Y Airspace under the responsibility of Lithuania. Route segment NINTA – other State(s): ADAXA.
Annual Report published: Y http://www.lgs.lv/en/corporate-information/reports/ This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP.
ANSP website: www.lgs.lv LGS Organisational Chart is presented in Annex B.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 8 Released issue 1.2.2.1 ATC system in use
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SiATM (Sweden) Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2013 (next upgrade is planned for 2015)
1.2.2.2 ATC units The ATC units in the Latvian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:
ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks En-route TMA RIGA ACC 3 RIGA En-route RIGA TMA / APP 2 RIGA LIEPAJA FIC 1 RIGA FIS / AFIS below FL095
1.2.3 Airports
1.2.3.1 General information The main international airport in Latvia is RIGA International Airport. It is fully state owned Joint-Stock Company of the Republic of Latvia. The holder of state capital shares is the Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Latvia. Latvia has some airfields for general aviation as well.
1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, ITY-ADQ and SAF11. In addition to the Annex B of the ESSIP Plan edition 2014, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. According to these criteria the airport covered in this LSSIP is Riga airport.
1.2.4 Military Authorities The Military Authorities (Air Forces) in Latvia are composed of: - Air Forces HQ; - Air Surveillance Squadron; - Aviation Squadron; - Ground based Air Defence Battalion; - Airfield Operations Support Unit. They report to the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Latvia and Commander of Latvian National Armed Forces. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. Information on the application of FUA is in 1.2.4.4. National Armed Forces website: www.mil.lv
1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 9 Released issue
1.2.4.1 Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rule-making
OAT GAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military N/A by national legal provisions? governed by national legal provisions? Level of such legal provision: Cabinet of Ministers Level of such legal provision: N/A Authority signing such legal provision: Cabinet of Authority signing such legal provision: N/A Ministers These provisions cover: These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for OAT N Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A OAT/GAT Coordination N OAT/GAT Coordination N/A ATCO Training N ATCO Training N/A ATCO Licensing N ATCO Licensing N/A ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N/A ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N/A Aircrew Training N ESARR applicability N/A Aircrew Licensing N Additional Information: Bilateral agreement between Additional Information: Military are subject to Civil NATO and the three Baltic States. (NATO Air Policing) Rules Means used to inform airspace users (other than Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: military) about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP Y National Military AIP N/A National Military AIP N/A EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP Y Other: Other:
Oversight OAT GAT National oversight body for OAT: MoD NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: there is no Military NSA in Latvia. Military does not provide service to GAT. Additional information:N/A Additional information: N/A
1.2.4.2 Service Provision role
OAT GAT Services Provided: NATO (only for air policing) Services Provided: En-Route N En-Route N Approach/TMA N Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND N Airfield/TWR/GND N AIS N AIS N MET Y MET N SAR Y SAR Y TSA/TRA monitoring Y (NATO) FIS N Other: Other: N Additional Information: There are no TRAs for OAT. Additional Information: The SAR coordination is provided by LGS.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 10 Released issue
Military ANSP providing GAT N/A If YES, since: Duration of the services SES certified? Certificate: Certificate issued by: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? Additional Information:
1.2.4.3 User role
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft OAT only N GAT only Y Both OAT and GAT N* can fly? * “Yes” in case of A - Scramble.
If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing N/A Within specific corridors only N/A Within the regular (GAT) national route network N/A Under radar control N/A Within a special OAT route system N/A Under radar advisory service N/A
If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Y Exemption from Route Charges Y Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF N/A CNS exemptions: RVSM N/A 8.33 N Mode S N ACAS N Others:
1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
Military in
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 11 Released issue Chapter 2 - Traffic and Capacity
2.1 Evolution of traffic in Latvia
Latvia - Annual IFR Movements
400.000 Latvia - Distribution (Ref. year 2013)
350.000 Overflights 71% 300.000
250.000
200.000 Domestic flights 0%
IFR flights IFR IFR movements - Actuals 150.000 International IFR movements - Baseline forecast Dep/Arr 100.000 28% IFR movements - High forecast
50.000 IFR movements - Low forecast A = Actual F = Forecast 0 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F
EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2014) IFR flights yearly growth 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F H 4.7% 6.3% 5.9% 5.0% 5.2% 5.1% 4.9% Latvia B 9.8% -1.0% 1.3% 4.2% 3.7% 2.9% 2.5% 2.7% 2.8% 2.7% L 3.8% 1.5% 0.4% 0.6% 1.1% 1.1% 1.0% ESRA08 B 3.1% -2.4% -1.1% 1.8% 2.4% 2.8% 2.3% 2.3% 2.8% 3.1%
2014 Traffic in Latvia increased by 3.3% during Summer 2014 (May to October inclusive), when compared to Summer 2013.
2015-2019
The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.9% and 5.5% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.9%.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 12 Released issue 2.2 RIGA ACC
2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019
EVRRACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
1200 1.0
0.9 1000 0.8
0.7 800 0.6
600 0.5
0.4
IFR flights (Daily Average) (Daily flights IFR 400 0.3 Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) (minutes Delay Enroute
0.2 200 0.1
0 0.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Peak Day Traffic 620 819 833 831 841 Summer Traffic 516 716 704 714 738 Yearly Traffic 477 639 634 642 662 Summer Traffic Forecast 749 775 798 820 844 High Traffic Forecast - Summer 766 819 865 915 960 Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 740 744 753 766 775 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014
2.2.2 Summer 2014 performance
En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity Traffic Evolution 2014 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual gap + 3.3 % 85 (0%) 0.05 0.00 No The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.
Capacity Plan Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments Various ATM system improvements Yes Maximum configuration: 3 + 2 APP Yes Summer 2014 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as in 2012. The average peak 1 hour demand was 68 and the peak 3 hour demand was 61 flights during the measured period, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet the demand.
2.2.3 Planning Period 2014-2018/19 - Summer The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values EVRRCTA 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Annual 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 Summer 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Capacity Profiles 2014 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) ACC baseline 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 H 85 0% 86 1% 87 1% 89 2% 95 7% Ref. 85 0% 85 0% 85 0% 86 1% 87 1% EVRR 85 L 85 0% 85 0% 85 0% 85 0% 85 0% Open 85 0% 85 0% 85 0% 86 1% 87 1% C/R 85 0% 85 0% 85 0% 86 1% 86 0%
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 13 Released issue Capacity Plan 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Free Route Airspace Airspace Management
Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network
Integration Cooperative Traffic
Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Various ATM system improvements Capacity Significant Events Max sectors 3 + 2 APP 3 + 2 APP 3 + 2 APP 3 + 2 APP 3 + 2 APP Capacity increase p.a. Sufficient capacity to meet demand Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 1% 1%
Additional information
EVRRCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 100
90 hour) 80 per
70 (movements
profile
60 Capacity
50
40 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 85 85 85 86 87 Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 85 85 85 86 87 Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 85 85 85 86 86 Capacity Profile ‐ High 85 86 87 89 95 Capacity Profile ‐ Low 85 85 85 85 85 Capacity Baseline 85 85 2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 85 86 87 89 95
2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for Riga ACC during the planning period.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 14 Released issue Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations
Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2013 applicable to Latvia for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.
Reference Recommendation Ownership number
Local Stakeholders that declared delays in DK, EE, MAS, BE, implementation of FCM01 to take corrective LV, MK, CZ, CY, REC-2013-1 (1) measures to reduce the implementation delays. NO, AM, PT, BA, UA, TR, UK State feedback: The automated ATM system provides FSA to NM already. Further modernisation is in progress. Implementation of CPR messages is expected within 04/2015.
Local Stakeholders that declared delays in BE, BG, CZ, IE, ES, implementation of SAF10 to take corrective AZ, BA, LV, EE, MD, REC-2013-1 (5) measures to reduce the implementation delays. ME, MK, UA, GR, HR, HU, PT, TR, RS, SE, SI, AL State feedback: All corresponding components of the Action Plan are prepared for the implementation within 2015.
Local Stakeholders that declared delays in ES, DE, BE, CY, REC-2013-1 (7) implementation of NAV03 to take corrective BG, GE, LV, AZ, measures to reduce the implementation delays. MD, ME, MK, MT, HR, IT, RS, UK State feedback: Implementation of P-RNAV procedures is planned based on National PBN Concept and corresponding National PBN Implementation Plan. Both national documents are not ready yet. Initial implementation is expected in 2016. All co-ordinate data are published in AIP with reference to the WGS- 84 standard and meet the quality requirements of ICAO Annex 15.
REC-2013-4 Ensure better planning reliability at local level. All States State feedback: Individual stakeholders have been informed through dedicated LSSIP report meetings about the appropriate planning for the implementation of the objectives.
The ANSPs should ensure synchronised system REC-2013-5 All ECAC ANSPs evolution between neighbouring States. State feedback: CPDLC implementation project is a subject of BOREALIS and NEFAB cooperation. It is sponsored by TEN-T fund. Free Route Airspace implementation is a subject of regional cooperation. Operational concepts of both CPDLC and FRA were developed together with neighbouring ANSPs. Implementation approaches as well as stages of the work were agreed. Timetables are synchronised.
The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more REC-2013-15 FAB ANSPs closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers. State feedback: CPDLC implementation project is a subject of BOREALIS and NEFAB cooperation. It is sponsored by TEN-T fund. Free Route Airspace implementation is a subject of NEFAB cooperation. Operational concepts of both CPDLC and FRA were developed together with neighbouring ANSPs. Implementation approaches as well as stages of the work were agreed. Timetables are synchronised.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 15 Released issue Chapter 4 - National Projects
Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Expected Contribution to the Key Master Plan / Performance Areas * Other references LGS (LV) Communication The project objective is enhancement of 2018 The project is under ESSIP:COM10 Capacity: - Project existing AMHS functionality adding new establishment. OI-Steps: - Safety: A harmonised set of safety functions according to the requirements of requirements. the ESSIP (COM10-ASP03) and ATM Other: - Master Plan (CTE-C10). One of the new Environment: Reduction of power system components is going to be "AMHS consumption and heating emission. to SWIM Connector" providing SWIM. Cost-Efficiency: Use of COTS messaging systems. Support exchange of any kind of message format including new binary data. Cost reduction of messaging services at the end. PBN Analysis of the existing airspace structure March 2013 - ESSIP:COM10, Capacity: 1. Increase airspace capacity. Implementation of Riga FIR, development, validation and / November ENV01, NAV03, 2. Increase of traffic compared to 2013. Project (RP- implementation of PBN air space 2016 NAV10 3. Reduction of flight time in TMA. AD/PLN-01/6 elements and procedures. OI-Steps: AOM- Safety: 1. Reduction of numbers of incidents (2013)) 0601, AOM-0602, related to airspace design and volume. AOM-0604, AOM- 2. Reduction of known interface challenges in 0701 specific areas. Other: - 3. Segregation of air routes and de-conflicting of SIDs/STARs. 3. Improvement of safety compared to a 2008 baseline. Environment: 1. Reduction of CO2 emissions and noise by means of new airspace and route design. 2. The target is 5% reduction of CO2 emissions per flight Cost-Efficiency: 1. Increase of traffic with the same staff. 2. Increase of revenues and reduction of unit rates. 3. The airports will be given incentives for growth and increase of revenues.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 16 Released issue Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Expected Contribution to the Key Master Plan / Performance Areas * Other references LGS (LV), RIGA Airport (LV) A-SMGCS A-SMGCS modernization with „Follow- May 2012 / System upgrade was ESSIP:AOP04.2 Capacity: 1. Increase of capacity compared Modernisation the-Green” concept. November completed successfully. OI-Steps: AO-0102 to 2013 due to reduced taxing time on the (RP-AD/PLN- 2017 Transition to the upgraded ground. Other: - 01/20 (2012)) system is planned within Safety: 1. Reduction of incidents related to March 2015. Besides of RWY incursions. hardware and software 2. An integrated system processing the data upgrade the system from ATM and A - SMGCS systems. The comprises a bunch of new system will provide ATCOs with reliable data functionalities for instance on air and ground situation. "stop - bar" monitoring and 3. Improved safety compared to the 2008 control. baseline. Environment: Reduction of CO2 emissions and noise due to better traffic management on the ground. Cost-Efficiency: 1. Increase of capacity as well as improvements of the service provision. 2. Increased traffic with the same staff number. 3. Increase of revenues and reduction of unit rates. 4. The airports will be given incentives for growth and increase of revenues. Collaborative The project aims increase capacity of the September The working group was ESSIP:AOP05 Capacity: 1. Traffic increase due to CDM Decision Making RIGA International Airport by means of A- 2012 / established in September OI-Steps: AO-0501, (2013 baseline). (CDM) CDM implementation. Initial steps assume November 2012. AO-0601, AO-0602, 2. Reduction of flight time on the ground. Implementation investigation of problems and 2019 AO-0603 3. Increase airspace capacity in Riga Airport development of Implementation Plan. Other: - Safety: 1. Airport operators, aircraft (RP-AD/PLN- operators, ground handlers and air traffic 01/43 (2012)) control use real time data sharing. Due to this an accurate and timely information will provide more safe and efficient flights. Environment: 1. Reduction of flight time on the ground. Cost-Efficiency: 1. Reduction of flight time on the ground. 2. Increased traffic with the same staff
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 17 Released issue Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Expected Contribution to the Key Master Plan / Performance Areas * Other references number. 3. Increase of revenues and reduction of unit rates. 4. The airports will be given incentives for growth and increase of revenues.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 18 Released issue Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination
5.1 FAB Co-ordination
North European Functional Airspace Block - NEFAB NEFAB is a functional airspace block created by Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Norway. NEFAB has established a programme with a programme management office (PMO) with the objective of managing projects and initiatives among the ANSPs in the cooperation. In addition there is close cooperation with LFV and Naviair in DK/SE-FAB concerning airspace development. In this cooperation the implementation of a seamless Free Route Airspace above FL 285 across the two airspace blocks is prioritised in the short term with planned implementation towards the end of 2015. The activity is targeted to connect Free Route Airspace in the two FAB´s ensuring a continuous Free Route Airspace. The activity is organised as a project called North European Free Route Airspace – NEFRA. This project is not aimed at airspace developments inside the two airspace blocks. The ANSPs in NEFAB have developed a 5 year business plan, covering the period 2014 – 2018 and an annual plan for 2014. The 5 year business plan describes the strategies for the period with key performance areas and strategic objectives. The annual plan transforms these strategies into activities planned for 2014 with defined deliverables and milestones. In April 2013 two key projects, Airspace 2015 and ATS Provision 2015, delivered the NEFAB Network Plan. The NEFAB Network Plan describes the operational requirements for the establishment of the airspace and service provision within NEFAB in 2015. 2015 is considered an intermediate step towards a performance scenario planned for 2020 and beyond. The individual ANSPs in the FAB-cooperation will implement the required operational changes and technical support to enable the concept described in the NEFAB Target Concept.
Regulatory Co-operation During the establishment of NEFAB there has been close cooperation between the 4 NEFAB NSAs, and this cooperation is now formalised by the NEFAB NSA Committee. There is also established cooperation between the other Nordic NSAs, by the 7-State NSA Cooperation. Meetings between the 4 NEFAB NSAs and representatives from NSA Iceland, Sweden and Denmark have been held, and cooperation are established on areas of common interest. This cooperation will be continued.
Civil-Military Co-ordination NEFAB has established the Civil-Military Committee (CMC) that consists of representatives from CAA and MAA. The function of the committee is to: - define areas of cooperation between the Contracting States within the scope of the NEFAB Agreement as regards military aviation; - enhance the use of airspace in NEFAB, taking account of military aviation needs, including military mission effectiveness; - provide for efficient and consistent application of the concept of ‘flexible use of airspace’ by the Contracting States; - provide for the development of arrangements for military training activities regardless of existing boundaries. Several meetings have taken place. The committee in 2014 was chaired by MAA Finland. and the co-operation has been fruitful.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 19 Released issue 5.2 FAB Projects
Organisations Name Code Description Implementati EATM Links Status Performance Cooperation on Planning Contribution2 Activities NEFAB (Avinor, FRA N/A Free Route Airspace May 2012 - AOM21, Active, on- Present or Common EANS, Finavia, above FL90 across the Nov 2015 AOM19/ time additional planning and LGS) FAB. Airspace scenarios ASM- capacity and simulations. and simulations are functionality safety, more cost- supported by efficiency with Eurocontrol. less pollution.
2 Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment – as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 20 Released issue
5.3 Regional cooperation
5.3.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives Baltic Integration Baltic Integration is stemming from ICAO EANPG/42/2 (December 2000), which established a Task Force (TF) to draft a Memorandum of Understanding and identify priorities for a common Baltic UIR or other type of ATM co-operation over parts of the high seas. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland are members of the TF, under the ICAO EUR aegis. To the end of 2002 the Task Force developed ”DRAFT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR HARMONIZATION AND INTEGRATION OF COMPONENTS OF THE AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEMS IN THE BALTIC AREA”. The document as well as its Technical Annex was presented to the appropriate National Authorities. Cooperation has crystallized as Baltic CNS/ATM Transition Project Feasibility Study (2001-2004). The project produced a coordinated CNS/ATM Sub-regional Implementation Plan for Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia complying with recommendations of international aviation organisations and defining short-term needs and long- term prospective of air navigation systems in the three contracting states. The Borealis Alliance Framework Agreement The Alliance Framework Agreement (AFA) is a business co-operation signed on the 20th of June 2012. The vision of Borealis is to be the leading ANSP Alliance that enables its Members to drive better performance for stakeholders through business collaboration. On the same day the co-operation agreement known as NEAP (North European ANS Providers) was formally ended. The members of Borealis are LFV (Sweden), Finavia (Finland), Avinor (Norway), ISAVIA (Iceland), Naviair (Denmark), EANS (Estonia), IAA (Ireland), LGS (Latvia) and NATS (UK). Borealis has two objectives, the first relates to delivering value through business co-operation between the Members, the second to being collectively more influential by developing and expressing a joint position on common issues. These objectives will be achieved by developing and delivering a joint business plan. The Agreement does not commit the Members to work towards creating a single combined FAB between their respective States sometime in the future, but it does not preclude such an outcome either.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 21 Released issue
5.3.2 Regional Projects
Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Expected Contribution to the Key Master Plan / Performance Areas * Other references LGS (LV) ATRACC - 2014+ The title ATRACC (Air Traffic Riga Area November Project is in progress. The ESSIP:AOM21, ITY- Capacity: CPDLC: Increased capacity (RP-AD/PLN- Control Centre) comprises an ATM 2013 / June ATM modernization is ADQ, ITY-AGDL, through both reduction of voice congestion 01/57 (2013)) system for tower, approach and area 2016 moving smoothly as ITY-COTR, ITY- and increase of controller efficiency. control of the Riga FIR. The system has prescribed by the Project FMTP FRA: The implementation of free route been designed and produced by the Management Plan. Despite OI-Steps: AOM- airspace brings significant flight efficiency Swedish company System integrering AB. of known data link 0401, AOM-0402, benefits to airspace users due to user The system is based on multi-sensor performance issues LGS AUO-0301, CM-0201, preferred routes. As a step to full trajectory tracking, advanced flight plan data continues modernisation of CM-0201-A, IS-0202, based operations the FRA concept brings processing, predicted flight trajectories, ATM system preparing the IS-0204 increased flight predictability, reduced OLDI (On-Line Data Interchange), silent platform for CPDLC uncertainty for the Network which in turn can co-ordination and paperless HMI. implementation. Free Route Other: - lead to capacity increase for ATM which will From the functional point of view, the Airspace functionality also benefit the user. system consists of two main components: development is going in DMAN: Improved airport / TMA capacity. Primary System, providing the full set of close cooperation with Safety: CPDLC: Through the delivery of functionalities described above, and NEFAB neighbours. standard and unambiguous messages Radar Bypass System as a backup if the (entailing significant error and fatigue primary system failed. reduction), the provision of a This open architecture system can easily communications back up and the possibility be expanded. It comprises more than 15 of immediate message retrieval, data link working positions intended for operators communications are a major safety with different operational roles, specifically enhancement. TWR (tower), ACC (Area Control), APP FRA: Some enhancement through reduction (Approach Control), ARCC (Area Rescue in controller workload. Co-ordination Centre), FDA (Flight Data DMAN: The same or improved safety. Assistant), HIST (History, Recording and AUTOMATED AERONAUTICAL DATA Playback), OSUP (Operational INPUT: Improved consistency, reliability and Supervisor) and TSUP (Technical integrity of data. Supervisor). The system has experienced some Environment: FRA: The free route airspace modernization stages. Current implementation brings significant flight modernization project named ATRACC – efficiency benefits namely: reductions in 2014+ aims system upgrade for: emissions through the use of optimal routes • CPDLC functionalities; and preferred flight profiles. • Free Route Airspace DMAN: A positive environmental effect in
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 22 Released issue Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Expected Contribution to the Key Master Plan / Performance Areas * Other references implementation (this part is coordinated terms of noise and fuel usage due to with NEFAB); reduced holding and low level vectoring. • Departure Manager (D-MAN); Cost-Efficiency: CPDLC: Data link is a • New tower working positions cost-effective capacity increase enabler implementation (TWR Supervisor & through sector productivity increase and Clearance Delivery); delay cost savings. ANSPs savings derived • Automated aeronautical data from staff cost avoidance. Aircraft operators input; will benefit of en route cost savings and • Others. reduction of delays. FRA: The implementation of free route CPDLC module of ATM system airspace brings significant flight efficiency modernization is a subject of CPDLC benefits to airspace users due to user Implementation Project as well. preferred routes. As a step to full trajectory based operations the FRA concept brings increased flight predictability, reduced uncertainty for the Network which in turn can lead to capacity increases for ATM which will also benefit the user. DMAN: Reduced costs through reduction in delays. AUTOMATED AERONAUTICAL DATA INPUT: Avoidance of repair, correction and re-work activities at data provider and data user level as a necessary step towards the implementation of system wide information management. CPDLC THE PROJECT OBJECTIVE January 2014 PROGRESS ESSIP:ITY-AGDL Capacity: Increased capacity through both Implementation The project objective is implementation of 2014 / Within 2014 the main efforts OI-Steps: AUO-0301 reduction of voice congestion and increase in the RIGA FIR CPDLC services in accordance with September are focused on two in controller efficiency. (RP-AD/PLN- COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2015 packages: the ATM System Other: It is a transversal project Safety: Through the delivery of standard and 01/2 (2014)) 29/2009 of 16 January 2009 laying down Upgrade and the Data Link unambiguous messages (entailing significant requirements on data link services for the Communication with ATRACC 2014+ . error and fatigue reduction), the provision of single European sky. It means a Infrastructure. The ATM a communications back up and the compliance with all applicable ICAO modernization is moving possibility of immediate message retrieval, standards, corresponding community smoothly as prescribed by data link communications are a major safety specifications as well as user needs. the Project Management enhancement. Plan. In contrast the Data Environment: - TRANSVERSAL PROJECT Link Communication Cost-Efficiency: Data link is a cost-effective Inside LGS the project crosses with the Infrastructure package capacity increase enabler through sector “ATRACC 2014+” project. The last one is experienced some productivity increase and delay cost savings.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 23 Released issue Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Expected Contribution to the Key Master Plan / Performance Areas * Other references a separate complex project focused on: disturbances. In June 2014 ANSPs savings derived from staff cost Free Route Airspace Implementation; the EC has acknowledged avoidance. Aircraft operators will benefit of Departure Manager and some other the technical problems with en-route cost savings and reduction of features. CPDLC module is just a part of data link services. LGS was delays. the ATRACC 2014+ project (CPDLC forced to put the project on a related functions; HMI; others). On the temporary hold, to await the other hand the modernization of ATM EC decision. In July LGS system is an absolute pre-requisite for Board decided to postpone CPDLC successful implementation. a discussion of the contract with SITA and ARINC. This THE PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS pause will help LGS to take 1. Customer: LGS; into account all new 2. Target group: airspace users; requirements of the 3. Subject of EC Regulation : European Commission if Republic of Latvia; any. However the CPDLC 4. SES dimension: NEFAB + IDP; implementation project is not 5. Sponsorship: EC (INEA former closed. LGS is eager to TEN-T Agency); continue based on a new 6. Communication Service Providers: clear roadmap. Currently SITA & ARINC; LGS continues 7. Developer of ATM System: modernisation of ATM SiATM. system preparing the platform for CPDLC implementation. THE PROJECT COMPRISES 8 WORKING PACKAGES: 1. Project Management; 2. Data Link Communication Infrastructure; 3. ATM System Upgrade; 4. Provision of Initial Operations; 5. Training of LGS Staff; 6. Validation; 7. Assessment of the Fleet Equipage; 8. Coordination with neighbours.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 24 Released issue Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation
Conventions Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’: o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.
Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**) State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date REG APO. Progress (**) REG high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) APO Impl. Date ASP ASP. Progress (**) ASP high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) ASP Impl. Date MIL MIL. Progress (**) MIL high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) MIL Impl. Date APO APO. Progress (**) APO high level progress statement (By:mm-yyyy) APO Impl. Date
(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable Multi-N Planned Missing Data APT Late
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 25 Released issue 6.1 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling [IDP] Not AOM13.1 Timescales: Applicable Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 State aircraft are handled as GAT outside of restricted areas or TSAs. Mixing of OAT and GAT air traffic is not authorized in Latvian airspace. Civil ATC provides service to GAT traffic only. There is no military ATC 31/12/2018 providing services to OAT in Latvia. State aircraft are handled as GAT outside of restricted areas or Not Applicable TSAs.Mixing of OAT and GAT air traffic is not authorized. Civil ATC REG provides service to GAT traffic only. EUROAT document has been formally (By:12/2018) introduced to the military for consideration. There is no military ATC 31/12/2018 providing services to OAT in Latvia. ASP Currently state aircraft except specified areas (TSA) are handled as GAT. Not Applicable
(By:12/2018) There are no military ATC providing services to OAT in Latvia. 31/12/2018 Military fly in the airspace under GAT rules, they fly OAT only in TSAs and Not Applicable MIL predefined specific areas. OAT is authorized to operate only under
(By:12/2018) military fighter control in segregated airspace.No plans to develop 31/12/2018 military ATC for OAT by 2018.
Implement Advanced Airspace Management Timescales: [IDP] AOM19 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 FUA is implemented at all three levels. Advanced ASM / ATFCM process is under implementation in 31/12/2016 accordance with Eurocontrol Guidance materials. ASP Advanced ASM process is under implementation in accordance with Planned
(By:12/2016) Eurocontrol Guidance materials. 31/12/2016
Implementation of Free Route Airspace Timescales: [IDP] AOM21 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Latvia plans to implement FRA along with the other NEFAB member states by the end of 2015. 12/11/2015 ASP The work is in progress. The local FRA airspace has been identified in Planned ATRACC ‐ 2014+ (By:12/2017) coordination with the Network and FAB partners. 12/11/2015
Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions Timescales: [IDP] AOP03 Completed Initial operational capability: 01/04/2003 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013 The runway safety team is operational. LGS and the Riga airport have implemented the EAPPRI 31/12/2013 requirements. The CAA issued an order to invite all involved stakeholders to create a Completed REG runway safety team and implement the specific recommendations from
(By:12/2013) the EAPRI (European Action plan for the prevention of runway 31/12/2006 incursions). ASP The runway safety team is operational. LGS has implemented all EAPPRI Completed
(By:12/2013) requirements. 31/12/2006 The runway safety team is operational. LGS and the Riga airport have Completed APO implemented most of EAPRI requirements. All communications associated (By:12/2013) 31/12/2013 with runway operations are conducted using aviation English.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 26 Released issue
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1
AOP04.1 Timescales: Completed
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 EVRA - Riga A‐SMGCS Level 1 system is operational from 2007. The A‐SMGCS is composed by a surface movement 30/06/2007 radar and a multilateration system based on Mode A/C and Mode S. LCAA has approved A‐SMGCS Level 1 operating procedures and the Completed REG installations at Riga airport. Appropriate information has been published (By:12/2010) 30/06/2007 in the AIP EVRA AD 2‐20. Local Traffic regulations. ASP Completed A‐SMGCS Level 1 system is operational at Riga International Airport. (By:12/2011) 30/06/2007 APO Completed A‐SMGCS Level 1 system is operational at Riga International Airport. (By:12/2010) 31/12/2007
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2
AOP04.2 Timescales: Completed
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 EVRA - Riga A‐SMGCS Level 2 is fully implemented at the Riga International Airport. 31/12/2008 ASP A‐SMGCS Level 2 system is operational at Riga International Airport. A‐SMGCS Completed (By:12/2017) Approach controllers have the A‐SMGCS picture in view mode. Modernisation 31/12/2008 APO A‐SMGCS Completed A‐SMGCS Level 2 is fully implemented at the Riga International Airport. (By:12/2017) Modernisation 31/12/2008
Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP] Not AOP05 Timescales: Applicable ‐ not applicable ‐ EVRA - Riga (Outside Applicability Area) The objective is not applicable to Riga International Airport. ‐ Collaborative Not Applicable The objective is not applicable to Riga International Airport. As initial step Decision ASP to A‐CDM LGS and RIX have implemented data exchange between Making (CDM) (By:01/2016) automated ATC system and Airport Flight Information Processing System. Implementation 31/12/2011 Agreement on data exchange is signed. in Riga Airport Collaborative Not Applicable As initial step to A‐CDM LGS and RIX have implemented data exchange Decision APO between automated ATC system and Flight Planning Management System Making (CDM) (By:01/2016) of RIX to provide silent coordination. Agreement on data exchange is Implementation ‐ signed. in Riga Airport
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 27 Released issue
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2
ATC02.2 Timescales: Completed
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 Advanced STCA functions are implemented in the automated ATC system and they are operational. The 31/12/2008 automated ATC system is conforming to STCA Level 2 requirements. ATCOs are trained accordingly. The automated ATC system is conforming to STCA Level 2 requirements. Completed ASP Advanced STCA functions are operational. ATCOs are trained (By:01/2013) 31/12/2008 accordingly.
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐ level 2
ATC02.5 Timescales: Completed
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Area Proximity Warning function is used operationally from 2001. Corresponding procedures and 31/12/2013 instructions for operational and engineering staff are established. Area Proximity Warning function is used operationally from 2001. Completed ASP Corresponding procedures and instructions for operational and (By:12/2016) 31/12/2013 engineering staff are established.
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2
ATC02.6 Timescales: Completed
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Minimum Safe Altitude Warning function is implemented in the automated ATC system and it is operational from 2001. Corresponding procedures and instructions for operational and engineering staff 31/12/2013 are established. Minimum Safe Altitude Warning function is used from 2001. Completed ASP Corresponding procedures and instructions for operational and (By:12/2016) 31/12/2013 engineering staff are established.
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2
ATC02.7 Timescales: No Plan
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 LGS will plan the APM implementation if the local needs will be identified and upon readiness of the 31/12/2016 Eurocontrol Specification. ASP LGS will plan the APM implementation if the local needs will be identified No Plan
(By:12/2016) and upon readiness of the Eurocontrol Specification. 31/12/2016
Implement arrival management tools Timescales: ATC07.1 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Implementation of AMAN tools is planned. The automated ATC system is already prepared to support 31/12/2015 AMAN. ASP LGS plans implementation of basic arrival management tools. The Planned
(By:12/2015) automated ATC system is already prepared to support AMAN. 31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 28 Released issue Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring
ATC12 Timescales: Completed
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 MTCD and MONA functions are implemented in the ATC system. The ATCOs are trained accordingly. 31/12/2008 ASP MTCD and Conformance Monitoring functions are implemented. The Completed
(By:12/2016) ATCOs are trained accordingly. 31/12/2008
Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations [IDP] ATC15 Planned Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Training of ATCOs and implementation of AMAN tools are planned by 2017. 31/01/2017 ASP Implementation of AMAN support functionality for en‐route operations is Planned
(By:12/2017) planned. 31/12/2017
Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: ATC16 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Respective nationaly registered aircraft are planned to be equipped with enhanced ACAS II version 7.1 and ANSP staff approapriately trained in order to further reduce the risk of mid‐air collisions in 31/01/2015 European airspace. Airworthiness certification and operational approval for ACAS II version Planned REG 7.1 equipped aircraft will be caried for Latvian registered aircraft. (By:12/2015) 31/01/2015 Appropriate oversight of the ANSP staff training is planned. All the personnel concerned have been trained accordingly. ACAS Completed ASP performance monitoring system is established as a part of ATS safety (By:03/2012) 31/12/2012 monitoring. National armed forces do not operate fixed wing transport type aircraft. Not Applicable MIL Appropriate training to the helicopter flight crew operating in the (By:12/2015) 31/12/2015 airspace with other aircraft equipped with ACAS II, has been provided.
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer [IDP] ATC17 Timescales: Planned
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Upgrade of coordination and transfer through automated assistance of electronic dialogue is planned by 31/12/2018 the end of 2018. LGS and supplier have discussed a draft specification with regard to Planned ASP electronic dialog. This specification is a subject of the automated ATC
(By:12/2018) system modernisation project "ATRACC 2014+". Implementation 31/12/2018 timeframe will be defined together with the neghbouring ANSPs.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 29 Released issue
Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) [IDP] COM09 Timescales: Completed
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2006 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014 LGS does not use X.25 networks any more. PENS is used operationally for the provision of EAD and CFMU services. LGS has signed a Contract with Eurocontrol and SITA for PENS services (ANSP applications: 31/12/2014 FMTP and AMHS) supporting IPv4/IPv6 dual stack. LGS does not use X.25 networks any more. PENS is used operationally for Completed ASP the provision of EAD and CFMU services. LGS has signed a Contract with
(By:12/2014) Eurocontrol and SITA for PENS services (ANSP applications: FMTP and 31/12/2014 AMHS) supporting IPv4/IPv6 dual stack.
Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: COM10 Late Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014 AMHS activity is coordinated together with neighbouring countries. 31/12/2016 The AFTN system is upgraded to Basic AMHS functionality. LGS made Communication Late ASP successful interoperability tests with Moscow COM Centre and Vilnius Project / PBN (By:12/2014) COM Centre. LGS is waiting for Community Specification to enhance Implementation 31/12/2016 AMHS capability. Project
Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM Timescales: COM11 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020 Latvia plans to implement VoIP by the end of 2020 31/12/2020 ASP Planned LGS plans to implement Voice over IP in ATM. (By:12/2020) 31/12/2020
Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements [IDP] Not ENV01 Timescales: Applicable ‐ not applicable ‐ EVRA - Riga (Outside Applicability Area) The implementation of this objective will be addressed after PBN implementation in Riga TMA. ‐ PBN Not Applicable ASP The implementation of this objective will be addressed after PBN Implementation (By:12/2013) implementation in Riga FIR. Project ‐ Riga International Airport has implemented noise monitoring system Not Applicable APO around aerodrome area. Noise footprint map is developed yearly (By:12/2013) ‐ including average day and night noise level.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 30 Released issue
Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports Not ENV02 Timescales: Applicable ‐ not applicable ‐ EVRA - Riga (Outside Applicability Area) Riga International Airport is not in the related list of airports. ‐ ASP Not Applicable Riga International Airport is not in the list of airports. (By:12/2016) ‐ APO Not Applicable Riga International Airport is not in the related list of airports. (By:12/2016) ‐
Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: FCM01 Late Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 Implementation of the objective is expected by 04/2015. 30/04/2015 LGS and Si ATM company have signed a contract on automated ATM Late ASP system modernization. As a result the system already provides FSA to NM
(By:07/2014) and will be able to send CPR messages. Implementation of CPR messages 30/04/2015 is expected within 04/2015.
Implement collaborative flight planning Timescales: [IDP] FCM03 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 Flight plan messages, at Riga ATCC, are processed in ICAO 2012 Format. Automatic sending of AFP 31/12/2015 messages is planned for 12/2015. ASP LGS and Si ATM company have signed a contract to provide automatic Planned
(By:12/2015) sending of AFP messages. Implementation is expected till 12/2015. 31/12/2015
Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) [IDP] Not FCM04 Timescales: Applicable ‐ not applicable ‐ Latvia is outside of applicability area. ‐ ASP Not Applicable Latvia is outside of applicability area. (By:12/2015) ‐
Implementation of interactive rolling NOP Timescales: [IDP] FCM05 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Latvia plans to implement interactive rolling NOP. 31/12/2016 ASP Planned Implementation of ASM support system LARA is in progress. (By:12/2016) 31/12/2016 APO Not Applicable Riga airport has no plans to transition to coordinated slots. (By:12/2016) 31/12/2016
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 31 Released issue Implement integrated briefing Timescales: INF04 Completed Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Integrated briefing is provided by Latvian ANOF (AFTN; NOTAM; OPMET; and FPL) system. 31/12/2012 ASP Integrated briefing is provided by Latvian ANOF (AFTN; NOTAM; OPMET; Completed
(By:12/2012) and FPL) system. 31/12/2012
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) Timescales: INF07 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 The existing policy documents will be reviewed and updated as necessary by 2018. It is planned to implement airport TOD management in accordance with the national policy. From an ANSP perspective, 31/05/2018 terrain and obstacle data are partly implemented. REG The existing policy documents will be reviewed and updated as necessary Planned
(By:05/2018) by 2018. 31/05/2018 The objective is partially completed. For terrain data it is implemented for Partly ASP Area 1 as well as at RIX for Area 2 and Area 4. For obstacle data it is Completed
(By:05/2018) implemented for Area 1 as well as at RIX for Area 2 and Area 4. 31/12/2015 Implementation of TOD for Area 3 is expected within 2015. APO It is planned to implement airport TOD management in accordance with Planned
(By:05/2018) national policy by 2018 31/05/2018
Aircraft identification Timescales:
Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 ITY‐ACID Planned System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025 Latvia plans to implement the regulatory requirement to have the capability of downlinking the aircraft 02/01/2020 identification in order to improve the continuous and unambiguous IFR GAT aircraft identification. The appropriate surveillance systems have been upgraded. LGS has Planned deployed and put into operations Mode S radars as well as WAM. The systems are capable to identify individual aircraft by means of the downlinked unique aircraft identification number. However flight data ASP processing system and surveillance data processing system still use (By:01/2020) discrete SSR codes in compliance with the requirements laid down in the 02/01/2020 Annex III of the Regulation 1206/2011. Implementation of the appropriate capabilities for the whole cooperative surveillance chain as identified by the Regulation is planned.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 32 Released issue
Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010
ITY‐ADQ Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be Planned implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 Latvia plans to ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information in accordance with 30/06/2017 Regulation (EU) No 73/2010 of 26 January 2010 REG Safety assessments are to be supervised, and compliance with data Planned
(By:06/2017) quality requirements monitored. 30/06/2017 ASP LGS plans to implement all the requirements ensuring quality of Planned ATRACC ‐ 2014+ (By:06/2017) aeronautical data and aeronautical information in time. 30/06/2015 APO It is planned to implement all the requirements ensuring quality of Planned
(By:06/2017) aeronautical data and aeronautical information in time. 30/06/2017
Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285 Timescales:
Entry into force of regulation: 06/02/2009 [IDP] ITY‐AGDL Planned New aircraft capability: 31/12/2010 ATS unit operational capability ‐ Regulation (EC) 29/2009, Annex I, Part B (except Croatia): 04/02/2015 Retrofit aircraft capability: 04/02/2015 Currently there is no ATN/VDL2 coverage over Riga FIR. 04/02/2015 REG Planned Currently there is no ATN/VDL2 coverage over Riga FIR. (By:02/2016) 04/02/2015 LGS plans implementation of initial ATC air‐ground data link services Planned above FL‐195. The implementation is sponsored by TEN_T fund. Data link implementation is a subject of BOREALIS and NEFAB cooperation. LGS has been conducted a tender with regard to air‐ground data link communication services provision. Due to the technical problems with ATRACC ‐ 2014+ data link performance acknowledged by the EASA and European ASP / CPDLC Commission LGS was forced to postpone a discussion of the contract with (By:02/2016) Implementation 04/02/2015 SITA and ARINC. This pause will help LGS to take into account all new in the RIGA FIR requirements of the European Commission if any. However the CPDLC implementation project is not closed. LGS is eager to implement the data link services based on a new clear roadmap. Currently LGS continues modernisation of ATM system preparing the platform for CPDLC implementation. MIL Military is not providing any ATM/ANS services. Military operates SAR Not Applicable
(By:01/2014) helicopters only, not able to operate above FL285. 04/02/2015
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 33 Released issue
Implement air‐ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013
ITY‐AGVCS2 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Planned Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 Planned in accordance with EC regulation 1079/2012 31/12/2018 REG Planned Planned in accordance with EC regulation 1079/2012 (By:12/2018) 31/12/2018 Partly ASP LGS is going to implement 8,33 kHz channel spacing below FL195. Voice Completed (By:12/2018) communication system is upgraded. Appropriate personnel are trained. 31/12/2018 MIL Existing plans includes acquisition of new aircraft fully and appropriately Planned
(By:12/2020) equipped to comply with EC reg. 1079/2012. 31/12/2018 APO Airport plans to implement the 8,33 kHz channel spacing by the end of Planned
(By:12/2018) 2017. 31/12/2017
Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 Partly ITY‐COTR For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision Completed of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012 : 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL 285 in the airspace in Annex I, Part B of Regulation (EC) 29/2009 (except Croatia): 04/02/2015 Flight data processing and exchange systems are implemented. Advanced functions are subject of further 04/02/2015 development. Flight data processing and exchange systems are implemented. ATC Partly system is fully compliant with the finalisation criteria. ATC personnel are Completed ASP trained properly with regard to operational use of implemented ATRACC ‐ 2014+ (By:02/2016) functions. The Logon Forward and the Next Authority Notified processes 04/02/2015 are planned for implementation by 2015. MIL Military does not provide ANS/ATM services and there is no electronic Not Applicable
(By:12/2012) flight data provision to civil ATC. 28/02/2015
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 34 Released issue
Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 [IDP] ITY‐FMTP All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 Completed All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 Modernization of the FMTP has been completed as planned. 31/12/2014 Communication systems are ready. to support information exchange via Completed FMTP between FDPS(s) for the purpose of notification, coordination and ASP transfer of the flights between ATC units LGS has signed a Contract with ATRACC ‐ 2014+ (By:12/2014) Eurocontrol and SITA for PENS services (ANSP applications: FMTP and 31/12/2014 AMHS) supporting IPv4/IPv6 dual stack. Corresponding IP addresses were received from Eurocontrol. NSA is notified properly. MIL Not Applicable Military does not provide services to general air traffic (By:12/2014) ‐
Surveillance performance and interoperability Timescales: Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 ITY‐SPI Planned New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 Objectives for surveillance performance and interoperability have been implemented on the civil side. 31/12/2019 Military plans to complete the appropriate tasks by the end of 2019. REG Formal acceptance of the ANSP safety assessments has been performed Completed
(By:02/2015) and communicated to the ANSP. 31/12/2012 All surveillance data transferred from LGS ground‐based surveillance Partly systems to other navigation service providers are in ASTERIX data format. Completed It allows identification of the data source and the type of data. The data are time‐stamped as coordinated universal time (UTC). Safety assessment ASP to all existing systems is developed and delivered to the Latvian CAA. (By:02/2015) Safety Assessment for the whole existing surveillance chain is under 05/02/2015 development. The training plans exist and corresponding training materials were provided. All personnel affected by the changes have been trained. MIL Planned It's planned to equip the military helicopters in due time. (By:06/2020) 31/12/2017
Implementation of P‐RNAV Timescales: NAV03 Late Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Implementation of P‐RNAV procedures based on PBN Concept is planned for 2016 Navaids sites were assessed against the P‐RNAV requirements and needs for additional DMEs were identified. All co‐ 31/12/2016 ordinate data are published in AIP with reference to the WGS‐84 standard and meet the quality requirements of ICAO Annex 15. LGS plans implementation of RNAV procedures based on National PBN Late Concept and corresponding National PBN Implementation Plan. Both PBN ASP national documents are not ready yet. Initial implementation is expected Implementation (By:12/2012) in 2016. All co‐ordinate data are published in AIP with reference to the Project 31/12/2016 WGS‐84 standard and meet the quality requirements of ICAO Annex 15.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 35 Released issue Implement APV procedures Timescales: [IDP] NAV10 Planned Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 Latvia plans to move from NPA to APV procedures by the end 2016 31/12/2016 REG Appropriate EASA material will be applied to local national oversight Completed
(By:04/2016) activities. 30/04/2011 Planned LGS plans implementation of APV procedures based on National PBN PBN ASP Concept and corresponding National PBN Implementation Plan. Both Implementation (By:12/2016) national documents are not ready yet. Initial implementation is expected Project 31/12/2016 in 2016.
Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements
SAF10 Timescales: Late
Initial operational capability: 01/06/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 The objective is planned to be implemented by end of 2015. 31/12/2015 REG Late Verification and monitoring of the effectiveness of specific measures. (By:12/2011) 31/12/2015 All corresponding components of the Action Plan are prepared for the Late ASP implementation. Organizational and technological activities improving
(By:12/2011) provision of FIS in lower airspace are validating. Implementation of the 31/12/2015 appropriate parts of the Action Plan is expected within 2015. MIL Late Military will implement the objective together with LCAA and LGS. (By:12/2011) 31/12/2015
Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Timescales: SAF11 Completed Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions have been 31/12/2013 implemented by the involved parties. The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Completed Runway Excursions are implemented. Safety oversight program with REG audits and inspections covers runway safety. Participation of the CAA (By:01/2018) 31/12/2013 representatives at the Runway Safety Team discussions is ensured for consultation purposes. The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Completed ASP Runway Excursions are implemented. Local airlines are involved in the (By:12/2014) 31/12/2013 Runway Safety Team activities. APO Airport operators regularly and upon necessity enact the necessary safety Completed
(By:12/2014) initiatives through Runway safety team actions. 31/12/2013
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 36 Released issue 6.2 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress
Note that the above picture is based on the Preliminary Deployment Programme V0, published in December 2014 by the Deployment Manager. The full Deployment Programme is foreseen by end June 2015.
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 37 Released issue Annexes
Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process
LSSIP Co-ordination
LSSIP Focal Point for Latvia CAA of Latvia Ērika Neimane LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP LGS. Vadims Stroiteļevs
LSSIP Focal Point for airport “Riga” Riga International Airport Dzintra Jātniece LSSIP Contact Person for Latvia EUROCONTROL Luca Dell’Orto
ESSIP Objective Implementation ESSIP EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL National Stakeholder Specialist(s) Objective PEPR Objective Coordinator AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. A. DYBOWSKA Jurijs BAZULEVS – LGS LUCCIOLI (E. REUBER till 02/2015) AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Mihails HAVKUNOVS – LGS AOM21 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Vadims VORONOVS – LGS AOP03 P. VRANJKOVIC Vadims ULJANOVSKIS – LGS T. LICU Dzintra JATNIECE - RIX AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC Vadims ULJANOVSKIS – LGS P. ADAMSON Dzintra JATNIECE - RIX AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC Vadims ULJANOVSKIS – LGS P. ADAMSON Dzintra JATNIECE - RIX AOP05 P. VRANJKOVIC Vadims ULJANOVSKIS – LGS P. ADAMSON Dzintra JATNIECE - RIX ATC02.2 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Igors NEMAHOVS – LGS ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Igors NEMAHOVS – LGS ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Igors NEMAHOVS – LGS ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Igors NEMAHOVS – LGS ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Vladislavs CASCINS – LGS ATC12 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Igors NEMAHOVS – LGS ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Vladislavs CASCINS – LGS ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL’ORTO Jurijs BAZULEVS – LGS ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO Igors NEMAHOVS – LGS COM09 L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Ainars SNEPSTS – LGS COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA Ainars SNEPSTS – LGS COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA Ainars SNEPSTS – LGS ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL not applicable ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL not applicable FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Sergejs OVSJANIKOVS – LGS FCM03 S. SMIDT O. CIOARA Sergejs OVSJANIKOVS – LGS FCM04 M. RICHARD O. CIOARA not applicable FCM05 P. MATERN O. CIOARA Mihails HAVKUNOVS – LGS INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO Vadims TUMARKINS – LGS INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Vadims TUMARKINS – LGS ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Alvis VILKS – LGS
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 38 Released issue ESSIP EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL National Stakeholder Specialist(s) Objective PEPR Objective Coordinator ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Vadims TUMARKINS – LGS ITY-AGDL S. DISSING A. KOKONA Vadims Stroitelevs – LGS ITY-AGVCS2 J. POUZET O. ALFARO Ainars SNEPSTS – LGS ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO Igors NEMAHOVS – LGS ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Igors NEMAHOVS – LGS ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA Aleksejs JAVORSKIS – LGS NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Janis LAPINS – LGS NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA Janis LAPINS – LGS SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT Alvis VILKS – LGS SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT Vadims ULJANOVSKIS – LGS
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 39 Released issue Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 40 Released issue SJSC “LATVIJAS GAISA SATIKSME” STRUCTURE
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 41 Released issue LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 42 Released issue Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations
This Annex only shows the Abbreviations that are specific to the Latvian LSSIP.
AF ATM Functionality ATRACC Air Traffic Control System for Riga Area Control Centre FT Fast Track LCAA Civil Aviation Agency of Latvia LFV Luftfartsverket LGS Latvijas Gaisa Satiksme NEFAB North European Functional Airspace Block NEFRA North European Free Route Airspace PCP Pilot Common Project PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme S-AF Sub ATM Functionality TAIIB Transport Accident and Incident Investigation Bureau
LSSIP Year 2014 Latvia 43 Released issue