A King in Isolation in His Own Castle?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
בס“ד Parshat Tazria-Metzora 1 Iyar, 5780/April 25, 2020 Vol. 11 Num. 29 (#450) This issue of Toronto Torah is sponsored by Esther and Craig Guttmann and Family מנחם מנדל בן שמואל ז“ל in honour of the yahrtzeit of Max Guttmann and by Ricky and Dianna Zauderer and Family לע“נ אליעזר בן יונה ז“ל in memory of our dear father and grandfather, Alfred Zauderer z”l A King in Isolation in His Own Castle? Rabbi Baruch Weintraub Both of the Torah portions we read Obviously, these two explanations are from his administrative roles, he is not this Shabbat deal extensively with the very different in the image they depict of a king anymore; if it is the latter, then a phenomenon of tzaraat (not to be Uziah’s last days. One conveys a picture king can exist in separation from his confused with leprosy or “Hansen’s of almost light-hearted retirement, civil service, even as the only man on a Disease”). However, while in the Torah probably cushioned with all the luxuries planet. we read about the struggle of an a king can expect. The second, average citizen with tzaraat, later in meanwhile, gives an eerie feeling of a One could further suggest that not all Tanach we find another angle on this living death, that he had lost everything kings are equal in regard to this problem, which may shed some new that counted as life, apart from its most question – maybe there is a difference light on the subject. physical aspect. between a king who as a scion of David, entitled to the throne by Divine promise, The story of King Uziah (a.k.a. The Talmud seems to be investigating and other kings, who were only Azariah), who was struck with tzaraat, this very same question when it asks if appointed according to contemporary appears in very short form in a king who is struck by tzaraat brings needs? [See Rambam, Hilchot Melachim Melachim II (15:5) and is elaborated the korban of a king or a layperson. 2:8.] A more daring move would be to upon in Divrei HaYamim II (26: 16-21). (Horiyot 9a) The doubt could be analyze each individual king – did he We are told that his illness came as a understood as depending upon the lead the people out of his own faith and punishment for excessive pride, question of whether the king at his own discretion, or was he only a manifested in his attempt to sacrifice experiencing tzaraat is completely tail swung by the people in his attempt as a kohen would. But our focus here rejected, or only suspended from the to acquire fame or power? Uziah could is not on the cause, but the outcome. executive role. [See Shaarei Yosef on present an excellent case study for such Uziah was replaced by his son Yotam, Horayot ad loc.] an analysis, but that is beyond our and Uziah himself sat, to the day of his scope. death, in “Beit Hachofshit” literally The Talmud concludes that the king can translated as “the free house” or “the still enjoy his treasury, and The king, of course, is only an extreme home of the free”. What is this house, consequently is still a king for the laws example of a question that we could ask and in what sense was it free? of korbanot. However, Rashi there notes regarding any person who is separated that this conclusion stands in dispute and sent out of the city because of In the commentaries we find two main with a later passage, stating that a king tzaraat [or quarantined for any other approaches, rooted in the words of who is struck by tzaraat is rejected from reason]: does he lose his own self, or is Chazal: monarchy and brings a layperson’s he able to free himself from his social • Rabbi David Altschuler (Metzudat korban. (ibid. 10a) framework? David) explains that Uziah stopped serving as a king, thus becoming The question underlying this discussion [For more on this, see Rabbi Elchanan free from the heavy responsibilities may be understood as relating to the Wasserman, Kovetz He’arot 37:10.] that come with the title. nature of monarchy – is it only a social • Rashi cites the Talmud phenomenon which describes one’s [email protected] Yerushalmi that Uziah built a relations to others, or is it a quality of house inside a cemetery, which is the king even when he stands by called “the house of the free” himself? If it is the former, then when because the dead are exempt from the king is cut off from his subjects and mitzvot. OUR BEIT MIDRASH ROSH BEIT MIDRASH RABBI MORDECHAI TORCZYNER SGAN ROSH BEIT MIDRASH RABBI SAMMY BERGMAN AVREICHIM EZER DIENA, RABBI ALEX HECHT, NETANEL KLEIN SEDER BOKER DIRECTOR RABBI MOSHE YERES ISRAELI CORRESPONDENTS RABBI ADAM FRIEDMANN, RABBI BARUCH An affiliate of Torah MiTzion and YU WEINTRAUB, RABBI JONATHAN ZIRING ∞ CHAVEROT ORLY AZIZA, MINDY CHAPMAN, SOFIA FREUDENSTEIN, ATARA GASNER, Find our upcoming classes on-line at TEHILA HELFENBAUM, AILEEN MORRIS, HADAS MOYAL, TIFERET NICKERSON www.torontotorah.com CHAVERIM NADAV GASNER, ARI KARON, YEHUDA LEVI, COBY LYONS, MORDECHAI ROTH, We are grateful to ILAN SHIELDS, NATAN SNOWBELL, DANIEL SUTTNER, URIEL WEISZ, ELI WELTMAN Continental Press 905-660-0311 Journey Through Tanach: Shemuel I, Chapter 20 Ezer Diena Summary with a hidden signal to transmit and Yehonatan and David reunite Chapter 20 opens with a discussion Yehonatan’s findings to David: On the briefly. They bow, kiss, and cry on one between best friends David and third day, David will wait (in hiding) another. Yehonatan wishes David well, Yehonatan (Shaul’s son). David is near Even Ha’azel, and Yehonatan will and reaffirms his commitment to him (rightfully) concerned that he will be shoot three arrows towards it. He will for future generations. (20:35-42) killed by Shaul, but Yehonatan argues then send a boy to fetch the arrows. If that since Shaul tells him everything, he instructs the boy that the arrows Insight and he has not told him that he wishes are towards where Yehonatan was The Talmud (Megillah 31a) instructs us David dead, he must not actually want standing, David will know all is well, to read a significant portion of this that. David responds by suggesting that and that he may come out of hiding. chapter (20:18-42) as the haftarah for since Shaul is aware of Yehonatan’s However, if he instructs the boy that Shabbat when Rosh Chodesh falls on love for David, Shaul may have hidden the arrows are beyond where he is the following day. Why? this fact from him. (20:1-3) looking, David should flee and not return. (20:19-23) On a simple level, Erev Rosh Chodesh David devises a plan to test Shaul’s is referenced in the opening verse of the intentions towards him: David will hide The plan works perfectly. On the Haftarah. However, Rabbi Mosheh in a field for two days (“until the third second day of Rosh Chodesh, Shaul Lichtenstein ( h t t p s : / / evening”), which will include two days of asks where David is. When Yehonatan www.etzion.org.il/en/machar-chodesh) Rosh Chodesh, when David would responds, Shaul loses his temper and suggests that this reading emphasizes normally join Shaul for meals. If Shaul berates Yehonatan for being so close to the importance of confronting the were to ask about David’s absence, David, and tells him that David must future, embodied by the new month. Yehonatan should tell him that he had be killed. When Yehonatan questions Shaul, despite realizing that his gone to Beit Lechem to bring a sacrifice. this decision, Shaul throws a spear at kingdom is coming to an end, tries to If Shaul would respond with anger, him, and Yehonatan realizes that deny that reality and fight on. then Yehonatan would be able to tell David is in danger, which upsets him Conversely, Yehonatan, his son, David that Shaul wishes to kill him, but greatly. (20:24-34) realizes that the best way to prepare for if he would respond calmly, with good the future is allying himself with the wishes, then Yehonatan would know Yehonatan then goes out to the field, future king. May we take this lesson to that all is good. (20:5-7) fires the arrows as discussed, and tells heart as we enter new stages of life! the boy that the arrows are beyond After they renew their covenant with him. After the boy gathers the arrows, [email protected] each other (20:12-17), they come up Yehonatan sends him off to the city, Holy Land Halachah: Non-Jewish Cemeteries Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner Rabbi Yitzchak HaLevi Herzog farmed. HaTorah v’haMedinah Volumes 9-10 Rabbi Herzog determined that this was not a concern either. May one bury a non-Jew in Israel? First, the prohibition involved is itself rabbinic, and all of our produce tithes are currently rabbinic as well, so that Rabbi Yitzchak HaLevi Herzog, the first Chief Rabbi of the this would be a rabbinic prohibition against uprooting tithes State of Israel, received this question from a community which are only rabbinic in the first place. Further, he where a Seventh Day Adventist family had requested burial contended that the prohibition may only apply where one plots outside the Jewish cemetery. The Christian community causes land to be farmed without tithing, and not to graves, would not bury them, and so they turned to the Jews.