AGENDA MATERIALS TRI-DAM PROJECT

TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY \\II #\\ BOARD MEETING

November 21, 2019 REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA TRI-DAM PROJECT of THE OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and THE SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT NOVEMBER 21, 2019 9:00A.M.

CALL TO ORDER: Oakdale Irrigation District 1205 East F Street Oakdale, CA 95361

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL: John Holbrook, Bob Holmes, Dave Kamper, Ralph Roos, Mike Weststeyn Gail Altieri, Brad DeBoer, Herman Doornenbal, Tom Orvis, Linda Santos

PUBLIC COMMENT: The Joint Board of Directors encourages public participation at Board meetings. Matters affecting the operation of the Tri-Dam Project and under the jurisdiction of the Joint Districts and not posted on the Agenda may be addressed by the public, and limited to 5 minutes per person. California law prohibits the Board from taking action on any matter that is not on the posted Agenda unless the Board determines that it is a situation specified in Government Code Subsection 54954.2.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 1-2 I. Approve the regular board meeting minutes of October 17, 2019.

2. Approve October 2019 financial statements and statement of obligations.

a. Investment portfolio and reserve fund status.

ACTION CALENDAR ITEMS 3- 12 3. Discussion and possible action to authorize the General Manager to sign the Professional Services Agreement with PAR Environmental Services, Inc. for Cultural Resources Studies along Hells Half Acre Roadway (5N95)- USFS.

4. Discussion and possible action to utilize the general fund or maintenance fund for Beardsley Afterbay maintenance repair project.

5. Discussion and possible action to approve staff to procure all materials, equipment, and training necessary to proceed with the Beardsley Afterbay Sheet Pile Grout Work Plan.

6. Discussion and possible action to approve professional services agreement with Watermark Engineering, Inc. for streamgaging services.

7. Discussion and possible action to approve Resolution TOP 2019.10 Elect New Secretary and General Manger.

8. Discussion and possible action to approve Resolution TOP 2019.11 Authorization for Maintenance of Deposit Accounts.

9. Discussion and possible action to approve 2019 annual recognition of unrepresented staff. 10. FishBio presentation and discussion and possible action to approve 2020 budget proposal.

11. Discussion and possible action to approve 2020 draft budget.

12. Discussion and possible action to approve 2020 ACW A membership dues.

DISCUSSION ITEM 13-14

13. 2019 JBEW Performance Recognition.

14. Discussion and update on Washington D.C. activities- Jason Larrabee.

COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS 15-18 15. Staff reports as follows: a. General Manager Report b. Maintenance Report . c. Operations Report d. Compliance Report 16. Generation Report

17. Fisheries studies on the Lower Stanislaus River

CLOSED SESSION ITEM 19

19. a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION Government Code§ 54956.9(d)(l) Tri-Dam v. Emilo Arco et al. Eastern District of California Case No. I: 19-cv-01505-DAD-BAM

Tri-Dam v. Resort at Lake Tulloch, LLC Eastern District of California Case No. 1:19-cv-01536-DAD-EPG

b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant Exposure to Potential Litigation Government Code§ 54956.9(d)(2) Four(4) cases

c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant Exposure to Potential Litigation Government Code § 54956.9(b) One (I) case

ADJOURNMENT ITEM20 20. Adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meeting

G Hems on the Agenda may be taken in any order. 0 Action may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. D Writings relating to an open session agenda item that are distributed to members of the Board of Directors will be available for inspection at the Tri~Dam Project office, excluding writings that are not public records or are exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act. o ADA Compliance Statement: In compliance with the Americans with Disability Act, if you need special assistnnce to participate in this meeting, please contact !he Clerk at (209) 965~3996 ext. 110. Notification 48 hours prior to meeting will enable the Project to make reosonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. MEETING

MINUTES TRI-DAM PROJECT MINUTES OF THE JOINT BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING October 17,2019 Manteca, California The Joint Boards of Directors of the Oakdale Irrigation District and the South San Joaquin Irrigation District met in joint session at the office of South San Joaquin Irrigation District located in Manteca, California on the above date for the purpose of of the TRI-DAM PROJECT, pursuant to the resolution adopted by each of the Districts on July 29, 1955. President Kamper called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.

OlD DIRECTORS

BRAD DeBOER HERMAN DOORNENBAL GAIL ALTIERI LINDA SANTOS

Also, Present: Jeff Shields, lnt<>rirY ifPJE3ct; Rick Dodge, Finance Manager, Tri-Dam Project; Genna Brian Belitz, Operations Swpervisor, Tri-Dam Project; QJ111PIIq[tce, Tri-Dam Project; Mia Brown, Counsel, SSJID; · Rietkerk, General Manager, SSJID; Jason Jones,

regular board meeting minutes of August 15, 2019.

ITEM #2 Approve the board meeting minutes of September 19, 2019.

ITEM #3 Approve the special board meeting minutes of October 3, 2019.

Director Holbrook moved to approve the Consent Calendar items #1, 2, and 3 as presented. Director DeBoer seconded the motion. The motion passed OlD 4-0, SSJID 4-0.

Page 1 TOP October 17, 2019 ACTION CALENDAR

ITEM #4 Quarterly presentation of monthly and year-to-date financial statements and September statement of obligations

Finance Manager Dodge reviewed the September 2019 financial statements, noting net revenue of $2.27 million for the month, presented the quarterly activity and secur~ies held in each of the Project's reserve funds, and reviewed the September statement of obligations and responded to questions.

Director DeBoer moved to file the financial statements and st:oJIAnlF ligations as presented. Director Roos seconded the motion. The motion passed OlD D 4-0.

ITEM #5 Discussion and possible action to approve to records retention policy and Resolution TDP 2019-0Ba, as well as rli«:r.n action to approve destruction of selected records

Finance Manager Dodge presented an amlenae.!ct'TJ Heads and the General Manager to approve of specific records to destroy.

Director Holbrook moved to table the nAr,rlrnAt~k and authorize destruction of the selected records as presented.' nded the motion. The motion passed OlD 4-0, SSJID 4-0.

ITEM #6 Discussion and 'eoeater and Duplexer with Battery Backup for

repeater and duplexer and answered Director questions.

:IU~)Ie:Keras presented. Director Altieri seconded

action to approve new lighting for Beardsley Service

. the quotes for new lighting at the Beardsley Service Center and

Director Santos the new lighting as presented. DirectorWeststeyn seconded the motion. The motion OlD 3-1, SSJID 4-0. Director Doornenbal voted no.

ITEM #8 Review and authorize the permitting process for vegetation management facilities, application requirements and fee

Susan Larson presented the updated plan, using information gathered from stakeholders at Tulloch, and resources agencies. The plan notes that private landowners are responsible for their privately owned facilities; however, Tri-Dam must approve any activity that occurs within the FERC boundary (515' contour elevation and below). An application form, including description of facilities and method of treatment would be required. Page 2 TDP October 17, 2019 Director Santos moved to approve a vegetation management application fee of $500 to cover the administrative costs, and include a performance deposit of $1 ,000 to cover the cost of potential removal by Tri-Dam if required. Director Holbrook seconded the motion. The motion passed OlD 4-0, SSJID 4-0.

ITEM #9 Discussion and possible action to approve Preliminary Seepage Mitigation Recommendations Tulloch Dam Spillway Engineering and Design Services

Jason Jones, OlD Support Services Manager, presented seepage mitigation recommendations and the related pre-construction and r-nro.,tro sArvicf~s proposal from Condor Earth Technologies, and answered Director questions.

Director Holbrook moved to authorize OlD General 111'"'n"'' Amendment No. 1 to Work Release No. 020 to Condor Earth Technologies . .... , and to enter into an Agreement with the contractor selected through ··•··· .. exceed $225,000. Director Doornenbal seconded the motion. The

ITEM #10 Discussion and update on the

No discussion.

of Donne/Is Thrust

FM Dodge announced pertaining to the nnlnn<>ll

ITEM #12 Staff

the Board and staff that Tulloch Reservoir cfrE~flec~t Tulloch Reservoir.

No

the Lower Stanislaus River

Director DeBoer thanked Susan Larson and all staff that participated on the Shoreline Management Conference.

Director Santos added staff did an outstanding job and was glad she attended.

Director Roos advised the next SJTA meeting is November 18 in Turlock.

Page 3 TOP October 17, 2019 Recess to Tri-Dam Power Authority

President Kamper recessed to the Tri-Dam Power Authority Board of Commissioners meeting at 10:35 a.m.

The Tri-Dam Project meeting resumed at 10:40 a.m. after the Tri-Dam Power Authority meeting adjourned.

President Kamper announced that closed session item 16d should move to open session. Director DeBoer moved to change the agenda as presented. seconded the motion. The motion passed OlD 4-0, SSJID 4-0.

ITEM #16 Closed Session

President Kamper announced before closed session would be discussed:

a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL Significant Exposure to Potential i+iindfii'\ri"'' Government Code§ 54956.9(d)(2) Four (4) cases

b. CONFERENCE WITH L Consideration of Initiation Government Code § b4!~5ci.H( One (1) case

At the hour of 10:54 a.

Disclosure of rAnnrh'~ pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1: There ~lm;ed session.

General Manager Jeff Shields, relayed to the Board items ~J;JagerCandidate Jarom Zimmerman.

a.m. due to another commitment**

A motion.was·'rr Holbro>ok. seconded by Director Doornenbal to make the following offer regarding· fringe benefits:

$190,000 base no housing stipend.

457 Deferred Compensation Plan- Employer will match up to $3,500.00 annually.

Sick Leave is useable as accrued; there shall be no "probationary" or "waiting period."

Initial Vacation shall be 120 hours, accrued per Employer's existing policy and shall be useable as accrued, with no "probationary" or "waiting period."

Page 4 TOP October 17, 2019 Administrative Time shall be 40 hours, vesting on a pro-rated quarterly basis until December 31 ( 10 hours), then fully vesting thereafter ( 40 hours annually on January 1).

Employer shall pay reasonable relocation and moving expenses for one (1) move, relocating Employee from current state of residence to California. Relocation and moving expenses shall include, but are not limited to the following: a) Breakage fees/penalties associated with Employee's current residential lease (Employer to receive copy of existing lease and to make payments directly to Landlord); b) Moving expenses, including moving company charges transporting, and unpacking Employee's household; c) Transportation costs in moving Employee and fam

Employee shall be required as a job-related requirement, Tri-Dam headquarters in Strawberry for a period no

The Board Presidents of OlD and SSJID substantive adjustments to the offer of orr.nlrnm-

The motion passed. OlD 4-0, SSJID 3-0. nt.

SSJID General Counsel presented Manager Employment Contract.

A motion was made by Director WElStEite~ to approve the form of contract to incorporate and with the following amendments:

a) Include IHJI•u.vt:~:: performance review after the first six (6) months of employment, and then at least annually thereafter; ,\:o!;'Liu"'' to six (6) months' salary; and rov1s1u'n to ly with recently enacted AB 51 regarding ry arbitration provisions to Labor Code and FEHA claims

Directors Orvis, Holmes and Roos were absent.

The next regular is scheduled for November 21, 2019, at Oakdale Irrigation District in Oakdale, California beginning at 9:00a.m.

ATTEST:

Jeff Shields Interim Secretary, Tri-Dam Project

Page 5 TDP October 17, 2019 FINANCIAL I. MATTERS Tri-Dam Project Balance Sheets (unaudited) itJBJ,llijN~~§DJE~c!i) ~-~ ·- ~~··~ ~ ~· ~---"""" October 31, 2019 Se[!tember 30, 2019 October 31, 2018 Assets 2 Cash $ 17,314,863 $ 14,062,072 $ 3,881,706 3 Investment Securities & Money Market 12,115,590 12,097,563 13,051,099 4 Accounts Receivable 3,066,582 4,186,766 2,826,738 5 Prepaid Expenses 426,409 447,021 293,882 6 Capital Assets 106,940,869 106,903,132 106,277,549 7 Accumulated Depreciation (50,785,746) (50,646,823) (48,999,803) 8 Intangible Assets 8,213,938 8,213,938 8,213,938 9 Accumulated Amortization- Intangibles (2,103,187) (2,083,726) (1 ,869,655) 10 Other Assets 46,980 31,839 51,203 11 Deferred Outflows - Pension Related 4,420,653 4,420,653 4,807,851 12 Total Assets & Deferred Outflows 99,656,949 97,632,436 88,534,508 13 14 15 Liabilities 16 Accounts Payable 318,800 382,685 297,665 17 Other Current Liabilities 488,602 434,182 425,592 18 Long-Term Liabilities 7,097,221 7,097,221 6,966,803 19 Deferred Inflows- Pension Related 270,021 270,021 277,700 20 Total Liabilities & Deferred Inflows 8,174,644 8,184,109 7,967,760 21 22 Net Position 23 Net Position- Beginning of Year 79,731,510 79,731,510 88,547,514 24 Contributed Capital - Districts 602,963 602,963 602,963 25 Distributions (18,252,000) ( 18,252 '000) (21,119,000) 26 YTD Net Revenues 29,399,832 27,365,853 12,535,271 27 Total Net Position 91,482,306 89,448,327 80,566,748 28 29 30 Total Liabilities and Net Position $ 99 656 949 $ 97,632,436 $ 88,534,508 Tri-Dam Project Statement of Revenues and Expenses Month Ending October 31, 2019

Percent of Current YTD YTD YTD Budget 2019 2019 Budget Month Actual Budget Variance Budget Remaining Operating Revenues 2 Power Sales $ 1,954,278 $ 35,625,601 $ 28,266,213 $ 7,359,389 $ 33,919,455 -5% 3 Headwater Benefit 268,500 298,559 (30,059) 358,271 25% 4 Total Operating Revenues 1,954,278 35,894,101 28,564,772 7,329,330 34,277,726 -5% 5 6 Operating Expenses 7 Salaries and Wages 246,545 1,744,547 2,065,047 (320,499) 2,478,056 30% 8 Benefits and Overhead 166,440 1,501,123 1,492,295 8,828 1,790,754 16% 9 Operations 5,003 100,682 167,992 (67,310) 201,590 50% 10 Maintenance 63,622 926,855 3,490,228 (2,563,373) 4,188,274 78% 11 General & Administrative 270,054 3,754,731 4,581,194 (826,463) 5,497,433 32% 12 Depreciation & Amortization 174,550 1,721,380 1,731,550 (10, 170) 2,077,860 17% 13 Total Operating Expenses 926,214 9,749,318 13,528,306 (3, 778,988) 16,233,967 40% 14 15 Net Income From Operations 1,028,064 26,144,784 15,036,466 11,108,318 18,043,759 -45% 16 17 Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 18 Investment Earnings 29,928 264,082 200,000 64,082 240,000 -10% 19 Change in Market Value of Investments 13,811 213,912 213,912 NA 20 Water Sales 124,500 138,527 (14,027) 166,232 25% 21 Equipment Rental 2,200 22,000 22,000 26,400 17% 22 Gain/(loss) on Asset Disposal 1,514 (20,833) 22,347 (25,000) NA 23 Reimbursements 6,785 177,265 172,938 4,328 207,525 15% 24 Other Nonoperating Revenue 953,191 2,451,775 2,503,022 (51,246) 3,003,626 18% 25 Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 1,005,915 3,255,048 3,015,653 239,396 3,618,783 10% 26 27 Net Revenues $ 2,033,979 $ 29,399,832 $ 18,052,118 $ 11,347,714 $ 21,662,542 -36% 28 29 30 Current YTD YTD YTD Budget 2019 31 Memo: Month Actual Budget Variance Budget 32 Capital Expenditures $ 53,903 $ 653,035 $ 1,702,372 $ (1,049,337) $ 2,042,846 33 Major Repairs- Hells Half Acre & 4700 Roads $ $ 370 $ 50,000 $ (49,630) $ 60,000 34 Major Repairs- Tulloch Unit 3 Access Rd $ $ $ 750,000 $ (750,000) $ 900,000 General Ledger Expense vs Budget with Encumbrances by Fund

User: rdodge Printed: 11/6/2019 3:13:37 PM -- Period 10 - 10 Fiscal Year 2019 !fi·_D!~~P!~.Jrni:

Fund Description Budget PeriodAmt EndBal Variance Encumbered Available %Available

1 Corporate 1 Bank Fees & Charges 13,500.00 1,677.73 11,935.81 1,564.19 0.00 1,564.19 11.59 1 Performance Incentive Exp 0.00 0.00 33,759.57 -33,759.57 0.00 -33,759.57 0.00 1 Corporate 13,500.00 1,677.73 45,695.38 ·32,195.38 0.00 -32,195.38 -238.48 1 Operations 1 Electric Exp Labor 1,346,929.00 155,747.83 1,073,680.52 273,248.48 0.00 273,248.48 20.29 1 Electric Exp OH 960,759.00 72,742.44 542,530.02 418,228.98 0.00 418,228.98 43.53 1 Interconnection Exp 3rd Unit 2,000.00 168.28 1,682.80 317.20 0.00 317.20 15.86 1 Power House & Dam Uti! 19,500.00 -3,768.27 18,214.49 1,285.51 1,455.88 -170.37 -0.87 I Dam Monitoring 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 100.00 I Operations Office Supplies 4,150.00 851.68 3,950.70 199.30 0.00 199.30 4.80 I Dam Supplies 7,000.00 1,023.79 6,886.19 113.81 0.00 113.81 1.63 1 Furnishings & Misc. Equipment 12,200.00 0.00 380.Ql 11,819.99 0.00 11,819.99 96.89 1 Safety Supplies & Related 59,075.00 322.53 14,116.56 44,958.44 30,245.11 14,713.33 24.91 1 Site Utilities IviE 34,300.00 0.00 28,614.16 5,685.84 504.51 5,18133 15.11 I Resource Mgmt USFS Beardsley 108,000.00 0.00 99,159.26 8,840.74 0.00 8,840.74 8.19 1 Travel & Conference 32,000.00 1,304.42 12,480.19 19,519.81 1,616.80 17,903.01 55.95 1 Schools & Training 24,365.00 5,000.00 13,390.00 10,975.00 0.00 10,975.00 45.04 I Trustee Fees Operations 2,000.00 166.66 1,676.60 323.40 0.00 323.40 16.17 1 Small Tools 2,000.00 100.89 966.41 1,033.59 0.00 1,033.59 51.68 I Depreciation 1,844,328.00 155,089.40 1,526,769.81 317,558.19 0.00 317,558.19 17.22 I PERC Relicense Amortization 83,100.00 6,924.99 69,249.90 13,850.10 0.00 13,850.10 16.67 I Beardsley Recreation Amort 150,432.00 12,536.02 125,360.20 25,071.80 0.00 25,071.80 16.67 1 Operations 4,697,138.00 408,210.66 3,539,107.82 1,158,030.18 33,822.30 1,124,207.88 23.93 1 Maintenance 1 Comms & Security Labor 1,131,127.00 89.246.33 660,899.52 470,227.48 0.00 470,227.48 41.57 1 Couuns & Security OH 829,994.00 35,722.93 297,102.15 532,891.85 0.00 532,891.85 64.20 I Maintenance Office Supplies 1,500.00 78.28 635.19 864.81 0.00 864.81 57.65 I Safety Supplies & Related 19,000.00 1,929.61 8,349.66 10,650.34 1,477.73 9,172.61 48.28 I Maint & Repairs - Structures 282,900.00 2,100.12 27,026.29 255,873.71 21,216.57 234,657.14 82.95 1 Maint & Repairs - Facilities 1,952,050.00 34,728.30 262,183.25 1,689,866.75 1,637,816.02 52,050.73 2.67 I Maint & Repairs - Plant 188,184.20 1,339.67 111,062.22 77,121.98 42,049.11 35,072.87 18.64 1 Electronic Exp 221,150.00 2,686.59 185,166.49 35,983.51 0.00 35,983.51 16.27 I Site Improvements 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 100.00 1 Mise Hydro Expense 34,000.00 0.00 5,355.61 28,644.39 1,487.00 27,157.39 79.87 I ComputerMicro Repair Replace 11,800.00 0.00 5,275.96 6,524.04 0.00 6,524.04 55.29

GL- Expense vs Budget with Encumbrances by Fund (11/06/2019- 03:13PM) Page 1 Fund Description Budget PeriodAmt EndBal Variance Encumbered Available %Available

1 Radio Repair & Replace Ops Ctr 3,300.00 0.00 181.25 3,118.75 0.00 3,118.75 94.51 1 Power Line Repair & Maint 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 100.00 1 Comms & Security Sys 52,440.00 1,802.42 39,378.49 13,061.51 7,085.45 5,976.06 11.40 1 Routine Road Maintenance 154,000.00 0.00 4,032.80 149,967.20 0.00 149,967.20 97.38 I Donnells Extended Repair 0.00 0.00 48,084.00 -48,084.00 0.00 -48,084.00 0.00 I Travel & Conference 9,700.00 0.00 4,212.36 5.487.64 175.00 5,312.64 54.77 I Schools & Training 20,150.00 0.00 17,895.00 2,255.00 0.00 2,255.00 11.19 1 ReseiVoir Management 18,500.00 0.00 8,159.23 10,340.77 0.00 10,340.77 55.90 I Rolling Stock MaintRepair 75,000.00 2,397.24 74,599.12 400.88 17,593.47 -17,192.59 -22.92 I Shop Supplies 20,000.00 746.37 18,626.31 1,373.69 573.86 799.83 4.00 1 Small Tools 12,000.00 2,504.38 17,474.93 -5,474.93 0.00 -5,474.93 -45.62 I Miscellaneous Equipment 16,400.00 200.00 2,385.00 14,015.00 0.00 14,015.00 85.46 1 Disposal Expense 6,000.00 687.73 3,846.99 2,153.01 0.00 2,153.01 35.88 I Fuel and Fuel Tax 95,000.00 12,414.90 77,077.00 17,923.00 0.00 17,923.00 18.87 I Equipment Operation & Maint 15,200.00 5.99 5,478.18 9,721.82 0.00 9,721.82 63.96 I Major Road Repairs 60,000.00 0.00 369.67 59,630.33 13,744.51 45,885.82 76.48 1 Tulloch Spillway Road Repairs 900,000.00 0.00 0.00 900,000.00 0.00 900,000.00 100.00 1 Maintenance 6,149,395.20 188,590.86 1,884,856.67 4,264,538.53 1,743,218.72 2,521,319.81 41.00 1 Administrative 1 Administrative Labor 0.00 1,550.41 9,967.34 -9,967.34 0.00 -9,967.34 0.00 1 Administrative OH 0.00 57,975.07 627,731.04 -627,731.04 0.00 -627,731.04 0.00 I Office & Administrative Expens 27,600.00 3,937.31 34,086.25 -6,486.25 375.00 -6,861.25 -24.86 1 Prof. Organizations & Subscrip 25,700.00 1,525.00 21,753.98 3,946.02 0.00 3,946.02 15.35 I Utilities Straw 36,500.00 102.05 30,860.99 5,639.01 809.01 4,830.00 13.23 1 Travel & Conference 34,500.00 0.00 7,762.34 26,737.66 753.48 25,984.18 75.32 1 Meals 3,750.00 74.62 2,574.75 1,175.25 0.00 1,175.25 31.34 I Drug Testing & Physicals 1,500.00 0.00 863.00 637.00 0.00 637.00 42.47 1 Computers and Related 11,700.00 0.00 1,228.78 10,471.22 2,246.61 8,224.61 70.30 1 Schools & Training 5,500.00 0.00 529.43 4,970.57 0.00 4,970.57 90.37 I Telephone Expense 21,550.00 2,696.27 22,982.40 -1,432.40 0.00 -1,432.40 -6.65 I Data Communications Services 3,464.00 28.26 4,412.26 -948.26 0.50 -948.76 -27.39 I Website Internet & Network 33,300.00 3,961.67 36,752.26 -3,452.26 4,190.00 -7,642.26 -22.95 1 Legal Fees 205,500.00 27,374.43 247,421.79 -41,921.79 0.00 -41,921.79 -20.40 1 Reservoir Management 4,500.00 0.00 4,879.00 -379.00 1.00 -380.00 -8.44 I Auditing Services 14,688.00 0.00 20,938.00 -6,250.00 0.00 -6,250.00 -42.55 1 Accounting & PR Software & Svc 10,046.00 837.24 10,134.90 -88.90 0.00 -88.90 -0.88 I FERC Part 12 Inspections 37,000.00 0.00 0.00 37,000.00 0.00 37,000.00 100.00 I Stategic Communication PR 60,000.00 2,075.68 12,475.68 47,524.32 47,524.32 0.00 0.00 1 2019 Shoreline Management Conf 0.00 8,079.35 20,864.07 -20,864.07 0.00 -20,864.07 0.00 1 License Condition Implement 25,000.00 13,846.74 16,444.68 8,555.32 9,280.32 -725.00 -2.90 1 Shoreline Erosion Mgmt Plan 120,000.00 0.00 0.00 120,000.00 53,896.00 66,104.00 55.09 1 Tulloch Rec Plao - Article 409 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 100.00 1 Tulloch Shoreline Mgmt Plan 22,500.00 0.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 100.00 I Mussel Risk, Insp & Monitor 6,100.00 0.00 0.00 6,100.00 0.00 6,100.00 100.00 1 FERC Cultural Resource Tulloch 57,700.00 10,318.70 21,160.33 36,539.67 37,994.67 -1,455.00 -2.52 I FERC Cultural Res - DonnBeard 201,500.00 4.973.80 19,945.50 181,554.50 277,170.43 -95,615.93 -47.45 1 Fish Study Publications 100,000.00 5,655.00 89,575.00 10,425.00 10,425.00 0.00 0.00 1 USBR Pin of Opr & SWRCB 360,000.00 40,000.00 460,000.00 -100,000.00 0.00 -100,000.00 -27.78 I Lower River Non-native Investi 1,000,000.00 83,333.33 833,333.35 166,666.65 0.00 166,666.65 16.67 GL- Expense vs Budget with Encumbrances by Fund (11/06/2019- 03:13PM) Page2 Fund Description Budget PeriodAmt EndBal Variance Encumbered Available %Available

I Adult Chinook Life Cycle 550,000.00 45,833.33 458,333.30 91,666.70 0.00 91,666.70 16.67 I Reliability Consulting 45,000.00 0.00 0.00 45,000.00 26,800.00 18,200.00 40.44 I Labor Relations NegConsulting 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 100.00 I Haz Mat Business Plan 2,500.00 0.00 2,289.75 210.25 0.00 210.25 8.41 I Legal Fees Fish Studies 100,000.00 5,580.00 69,198.67 30,801.33 30,801.33 0.00 0.00 I Liability Insurance 407,500.00 37,635.67 342,187.73 65,312.27 0.00 65,312.27 16.03 I Property and Use Taxes 20,000.00 20,580.77 46,420.43 -26,420.43 0.00 -26,420.43 -132.10 I Legal-Stan River Basin Plan 36,000.00 0.00 0.00 36,000.00 0.00 36,000.00 100.00 I Stanislaus River Basin Plan 738,490.00 -100,000.00 116,163.32 622,326.68 0.00 622,326.68 84.27 I Dam Safety Fees 215,566.00 20,000.00 192,020.48 23,545.52 0.00 23,545.52 10.92 I State Water Rights Fees 14,000.00 0.00 0.00 14,000.00 0.00 14,000.00 100.00 I FERC Admin & Land Fees 205,000.00 -10,660.38 143,089.59 61,910.41 0.00 61,910.41 30.20 I Streamgaging 73,150.00 0.00 53,550.00 19,600.00 18,075.02 1,524.98 2.08 I Strearngaging Cert U'SGS 52,200.00 4,227.47 42,732.28 9,467.72 0.00 9,467.72 18.14 I FERC U'SBR HWB Tulloch 90,500.00 7,541.67 75,416.70 15,083.30 0.00 15,083.30 16.67 I U'SFS Permit Fees 11,529.00 960.74 9,607.40 1,921.60 0.00 1,921.60 16.67 I FERC EAP PMF Security Plan 106,900.00 12,909.00 52,839.00 54,061.00 58,251.00 -4,190.00 -3.92 I Legal - District Water Rights 120,000.00 4,782.03 19,460.16 100,539.84 0.00 100,539.84 83.78 I Washington Advocacy & PR 121,000.00 10,000.00 91,195.04 29,804.96 0.00 29,804.96 24.63 1 Relicense Special Consultants 5,000.00 0.00 6,476.90 -1,476.90 0.00 -1,476.90 -29.54 1 Administrative 5,373,933.00 327,735.23 4,279,657.87 1,094,275.13 578,593.69 515,681.44 9.60 1 Capital Exp Fixed Asset I Flag & Flag Pole Labor 124,290.00 0.00 0.00 124,290.00 0.00 124,290.00 100.00 I Flag & Flag Pole OH 82,860.00 0.00 0.00 82,860.00 0.00 82,860.00 100.00 I 300kW Diesel Generator 75,000.00 0.00 0.00 75,000.00 73,948.88 1,051.12 1.40 I Siemens SCADA modern hardware 82,993.00 0.00 0.00 82,993.00 68.245.06 14,747.94 17.77 I Low Level Valve Actuator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,308.00 -7,308.00 0.00 I One Ton Truck 57,000.00 0.00 0.00 57,000.00 58,063.26 -1,063.26 -1.87 I Cooling System U'pgrade 110,000.00 0.00 0.00 I 10,000.00 4,706.00 105,294.00 95.72 I Wells Cargo Trailer (2) 13,000.00 0.00 0.00 13,000.00 0.00 13,000.00 100.00 I 34 ton maint truck 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 100.00 I Rock Breaker for excavloader 39,944.00 0.00 0.00 39,944.00 11,709.80 28,234.20 70.68 I Henke Helper lOft Plow 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I Rep! Micro Link to SP 72,428.00 0.00 0.00 72,428.00 68,125.82 4,302.18 5.94 I Dell 730R Server 25,000.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 100.00 I U'pgrade DVR's (9) 85,500.00 0.00 0.00 85,500.00 0.00 85,500.00 100.00 I Upgrade SCADA RTURTAC 12,000.00 0.00 0.00 12,000.00 0.00 12,000.00 100.00 I DVR replacement 9,500.00 0.00 0.00 9,500.00 0.00 9,500.00 100.00 I Upg radio link SP to DDM 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 28,249.29 121,750.71 81.17 I Parts washer cabinet w timer 9,000.00 0.00 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 9,000.00 100.00 I Battery Test Set Equip 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 100.00 I O'Byrnes Public Access Prop 675,000.00 0.00 0.00 675,000.00 18,796.73 656,203.27 97.22 I Newrepeaer 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 16,163.19 3,836.81 19.18 1 Flag & Flag Pole 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00 100.00 I 50kW propane generator 25,500.00 0.00 0.00 25,500.00 23,595.00 1,905.00 7.47 I Low level power drive 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 100.00 I ConVault Tank for Donnells 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 100.00 I Skimmer Gate Actuator 55,000.00 0.00 0.00 55,000.00 0.00 55,000.00 100.00 I Telemetry upgrade 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 2,924.60 27,075.40 90.25 GL- Expense vs Budget with Encumbrances by Fund (11/06/2019- 03:13PM) Page3

"---·~··----·- -··--- ···------~------·~·--- Fund Description Budget PeriodAmt EndBal Variance Encumbered Available %Available

I Upgrad GenTrans Protect I & 2 36,831.00 0.00 0.00 36,831.00 10,471.52 26,359.48 71.57 I Upgrade SCADA RTURTAC 50,000.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 100.00 I ISO Metering Donnells 35,000.00 0.00 0.00 35,000.00 3,892.71 31,107.29 88.88 I Fire Suppression Sys Unit 1&2 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 100.00 1 Fire Suppression System Beards 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 100.00 1 Capital Exp Fixed Asset 2,042,846.00 0.00 0.00 2,042,846.00 396,199.86 1,646,646.14 80.61 Expense 18,276,812.20 926,214.48 9,749,317.74 8,527,494.46 2,751,834.56 5,775,659.90 0.316 Total I Tri Dam Project 18,276,812.20 926,2!4.48 9,749,317.74 8,527,494.46 2,751,834.56 5,775,659.90 31.60 Expense 18,276,812.20 926,214.48 9,749,317.74 8,527,494.46 2,751,834.56 5,775,659.90 0.316 Total

GL- Expense vs Budget with Encumbrances by Fund (11/06/2019- 03:13PM) Page4 Tri-Dam Project Reserve Funds /Investment Portfolio October 31, 2019

1 1. Revenue I Operating Fund Moody's Purchase Maturity Purchase Face Market Yield to Average 2 CUSIP Issue Date Description Rating Date Date Price Amount Principal Value Gain/( loss) Coupon Maturity life 3 3134G8JT7 2/24/2016 FHLMC Bullet US Agency 8/29/2017 2/24/2020 100.063 70,000 70,044 69,975 (69) 1.50% 1.47% 0.32 4 3130ADN32 2/9/2018 FHLB Bullet US Agency 3/15/2018 2/11/2020 99.651 210,000 209,267 210,267 1,000 2.13% 2.31% 0.28 5 3133EFBF3 8/27/2015 FFCB Bullet US Agency 8/17/2017 8/27/2020 100.188 480,000 480,902 480,235 (667) 1.65% 1.59% 0.82 6 313376XNO 2/8/2012 FHLB Bullet US Agency 10/12/2017 2/8/2021 101.144 485,000 490,548 487,954 (2,595) 2.10% 1.74% 1.28 7 313378JP7 3/5/2012 FH LB Bullet US Agency 10/12/2017 9/10/2021 101.959 480,000 489,403 486,830 (2,573) 2.38% 1.85% 1.86 8 3135GOS38 1/9/2017 FNMA Bullet US Agency 10/26/2017 1/5/2022 99.911 480,000 479,572 484,464 4,892 2.00% 2.02% 2.18 9 3130AC5A8 8/15/2017 FHLB Bu ll et US Agency 8/17/2017 8/15/2022 99.862 480,000 479,339 483,336 3,997 1.85% 1.88% 2.79 10 3135GOT94 1/23/2018 FNMA Bullet US Agency 3/21/2018 1/19/2023 98.278 480,000 471,736 492,312 20,576 2.38% 2.76% 3.22 11 3,165,000 3,170,812 3,195,373 24,561 2.05% 1.98% 1.87 12 31846V203 NA First Am Govt Obligation MMF AAAm NA NA 100.000 87,314 87,314 87,314 1.43% 1.43% 0.00 13 Total- Revenue I Operating Fund $3,252,314 $3,258,126 $3,282,687 $24,561 2.03% 1.97% 1.82 14 15 2. Maintenance Fund Moody's Purchase Maturity Purchase Face Market Yield to Average 16 CUSIP Issue Date Description Rating Date Date Price Amount Principal Value Gain/(loss) Coupon Maturity life 17 3134G8JT7 2/24/2016 FHLMC Bullet US Agency 8/29/2017 2/24/2020 99.774 730,000 728,354 729,737 1,384 1.50% 1.59% 0.32 18 3133EFBF3 8/27/2015 FFCB Bullet US Agency 8/17/2017 8/27/2020 99.798 730,000 728,524 730,358 1,834 1.65% 1.72% 0.82 19 3133EJH04 3/22/2018 FFCB Bullet US Agency 3/22/2018 3/22/2021 100.000 625,000 625,000 631,938 6,938 2.48% 2.48% 1.39 20 313378JP7 3/5/2012 FHLB Bullet US Agency 10/12/2017 9/10/2021 101.309 730,000 739,557 740,388 831 2.38% 2.02% 1.86 21 3135GOS38 1/9/2017 FNMA Bullet us Agency 10/26/2017 1/ 5/2022 99.493 720,000 716,347 726,696 10,349 2.00% 2.13% 2.18 22 3130AC5A8 8/15/2017 FHLB Bullet US Agency 8/17/2017 8/15/2022 99.199 730,000 724,149 735,074 10,924 1.85% 2.02% 2.79 23 3135GOT94 1/23/2018 FNMA Bu ll et us Agency 3/21/2018 1/19/2023 98.212 755,000 741,502 774,366 32,863 2.38% 2.77% 3.22 24 3133EJSD2 6/19/2018 FFCB Bullet US Agency 10/5/2018 6/19/2023 98.989 700,000 692,923 734,062 41,139 2.89% 3.12% 3.64 25 5,720,000 5,696,357 5,802,618 106,261 2.13% 2.23% 2.04 26 31846V203 NA First Am Govt Obli gation MMF AAAm NA NA 100.000 3,024,251 3,024,251 3,024,251 1.43% 1.43% 0.00 27 Total - Maintenance Fund $8,744,251 $8,720,607 $8,826,868 $106,261 1.89% 1.95% 1.33 28 29 Total- Both Funds $11,996,565 $11,978,734 $12,109,555 $130,822 1.93% 1.96% 1.47 'lO 31 Other Monthy Activity - Revenue I Operating Fund: None 'l2 33 Other Monthy Activity - Maintenance Fund: None 'l4 35 Monthly Net Cash Flow - Revenue I Operating Fund: $ 36.79 36 Monthly Net Cash Flow - Maintenance Fund: $ 4,141.79 'l7 38 Market values provided by U.S. Bank Tri-Dam Project Total Generation - MWh 80,000

70,000

60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec • 2018 • 2019 • Historical Tri-Dam Project Generation Revenue

$1,000,000

$0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec • 2018 • 2019 Tri-Dam Project Storage AF - Donnells & Beardsley 170,000

160,000 150,000

140,000 130,000 120,000 110,000 100,000

90,000 80,000

70,000 60,000

50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 Tri-Dam Project

Statement of Obligations

Period Covered

October 1, 2019 to October 31,2019 TRI-DAM PROJECT STATEMENT OF OBLIGATIONS Period Covered October 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019

One-Half Oakdale Irrigation District $ 423,845.80 One-Half So nth San Joaquin Irrigation Distict $ 423,845.81 Total Obligations $ 847,691.61

CERTIFICATION

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

Tom D. Orvis John Holbrook

Gail Altieri Robe11 A. Holmes

Linda Santos Dave Kamper

Herman Doornenbal Ralph Roos

Brad DeBoer Mike Weststeyn

Each of the undersigned certifies that he is President or Secretary of his respective District; That the amounts designated above have been properly incurred as an obligation of the Tri-Dam Project; that checks for payment of said amounts have been drawn on a Tri-Dam Project account at Oak Valley Community Bank, Sonora, California.

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT PRESIDENT, PRESIDENT,

Tom D. Orvis Dave Kamper

SECRETARY, SECRETARY,

Steve Knell Date Peter M. Rietkerk Date Tri Dam Project Statement of Obligations Period Covered From To October 1, 2019 to October 31,2019

No. Chks. Amount Vendor Check Register Report (Please see attached Check Listing) 83 $536,056.48

Payrolls - Net Charges

Pay Date Pavroll Amount

3-0ct-19 Regular $ 112,220.32 17-0ct-19 Regular $ 117,366.40 31-0ct-19 Regular $ 82,048.41 Total Net Payroll $ 311,635.13 $ 311,635.13

Total Disbursements for the Period $847,691.61

Distribution Between Districts - Oakdale Irrigation District $ 423,845.80 South San Joaquin Irrigation District $ 423,845.81

Total Districts $ 847,691.61 Project October Checks by Amount

(ITRI·DBM PROJECT:;

Check Number Vendor N1 Vendor Name Check Date Description Amount

126028 !0294 FISHBIO Environmental LLC 10117/2019 Fish Studies 95,645.47 126076 I 0892 Siemens Industry, Inc. 10/25/2019 Deposit- Host Server Software Upgrade 71,847,89 126034 10813 ACWA Joint Powers Insurance Authority 10/21/2019 Health Benefits 68,070.57 126031 !0501 O'Laughlin & Pal'is 10/17/2019 Legal Matters 66,424.53 126026 10202 Condor Earth Technologies 10/17/2019 Beardsley Abay seepage investigation 32,955.53 126029 10347 HDR Engineering. Inc. 10/17/2019 Noxious Weed Plan, Beardsley Date Recovery 29,139.24 126068 I 0900 Chase Card member Service 10/25/2019 Office supplies, EPTC training, travel, mise parts, Shoreline Conf. Center 21,529.07 125995 !0815 Cal PERS System 10/01/2019 EE/ER Retirement Plan 18,205.08 126036 10815 Cal PERS System 10/21/2019 EE/ER Retirement Plan 18,205.08 126048 i1074 Gannett Fleming, Inc. 10/21/2019 EAP Inundation Map Revisioins 12,909.00 126025 I 0882 CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. 10/17/2019 Stanislaus River Basin Plan I0,586.50 126033 11204 VNF Solutions 10/17/2019 Jasan Larrabee- Consulting Services 10,000,00 126042 !0111 Breshears Inc. W. H. 10121/2019 Fuel 7,459,13 126043 10151 Calaveras Co Treas & Tax Collector 10121/2019 2019-2020 Properly Taxes, 1st installment 6,899.29 126021 10991 State Compensation Insurance Fund 10/07/2019 Workers Compensation 3,748.50 126059 !0611 Sierra Controls LLC 10/2112019 Tulloch control issues & Strawberry new radio link 3,444.63 126032 11067 Pacific Power Engineers, Inc. 10117/2019 Revenue Meters 3,371.50 125994 10183 Cal PERS S457 Plan 10/0112019 EE Sup! Retirement Plan 3,052.00 126035 10183 Cal PERS S457 Plan 10/21/2019 EE Sup! Retirement Plan 3,052.00 126014 11265 Christopher T. Maschal 10/07/2019 Tulloch Performance Deposit Refund 3,000.00 126017 i1266 Ellen QlLeary 10/07/2019 Tulloch Performance Deposit Refund 3,000.00 126039 I 0067 AT&T- SBC- Pac Bell 10/21/2019 Telephone 2,495.85 125997 !0812 Nationwide Retirement Solution 10/01/2019 EE Sup! Retirement Plan 2,150.00 126038 10812 Nationwide Retirement Solution 10/21/2019 EE Sup! Retirement Plan 2,150.00 126027 10250 Downey Brand Attorneys LLP. 10/17/2019 Tulloch Litigation 2,104.43 126004 10935 datapath 10/07/2019 Network Support 2,095.00 126030 11028 MHO Group, Inc. 10117/2019 Strategic Communications 2,075.68 126069 11043 Circuit Breakers Sales NE, Inc. 10/25/2019 Cleaned & tested DC relays 2,050.00 126070 10935 datapath 10/25/2019 In-house server configuration 1,866.67 126046 I 0521 Patrick Crane 10/21/2019 EE remimbursement of stolen tools 1,856.73 126071 11177 ES West Coast, LLC 10/25/2019 Mt. Elizabeth emergency gcneratro repair 1,835.81 126057 11011 Pacific Gas & Electric 10/21/2019 Utilities 1,429,20 126066 il269 Matthew Wearin 10/21/2019 EE reimbursement- EPTC Workshop 1,304.42 126061 10665 Staples 10/21/2019 Misc. Office Supplies 1,287.97 12606710111 Breshears Inc. W. I-I. 10125/2019 Fuel 1,275.81 126063 10735 Tuolumne Co. Tax Collector 10/21/2019 20 19"2020 Property Taxes 1,264.94 126024 i1267 Jarom Zimmerman 10/07/2019 GM interview travel reimbursement 1,259.37 125996 10811 lllEW I 0/01/2019 EE Union Dues 1,232.64 126037 10811 IBEW 10/21/2019 EE Union Dues 1,232.64 126047 10225 Debco Automotive Supply Inc. 10121/2019 Misc. vehicle repairs & parts 1,098.29 126011 11262 John Holbrook 10/07/2019 Director reimbursement- Shoreline Workshop 1,032.30 126062 10703 Tessco 10/21/2019 977.89 126022 11170 Van De Pol Petroleum 10/07/2019 831.88 126006 il 048 Fastenal (Vending) 10/07/2019 752.35 126005 10225 Debco Automotive Supply Inc. I 0/07/2019 564.46 126003 11263 cbf Solutions 10/07/2019 504.43 126074 10831 Mangan Meticulous 10/25/2019 500.00 126050 I 0389 Jack's Generator & Elec. Repair 10/21/2019 478.86 126016 10466 Mountain Oasis Water Systems & Btl Co I 10/07/2019 441.00 126065 10776 Waste Mgmt of Cal Sierra Inc. 10/21/2019 418.85 126058 10536 Pitney Bowes Purchase Power Inc. 10/21/2019 402.50 126010 10938 Great America Financial Svcs. 10/07/2019 358.42 126072 10402 Kamps Propane 10/25/2019 342.80 126013 10879 Lowe's 10/07/2019 303.84 126049 10366 Hydraulic Controls Inc. 10/21/2019 269.56 125999 10044 American Valley Waste Oil Inc. 10/07/2019 245.00 126073 10439 McMaster~Carr Supply Co. 10/25/2019 238.23 126008 10319 General Plumbing Supply Co Inc. 10/07/2019 235.80 126020 10535 Pitney Bowes GFS LLC 10/07/2019 226.69 126009 10320 General Supply Co. 10/07/2019 216.61 126019 10168 Petty Cash 10/07/2019 197.39 126060 10933 Smile Business Products 10/21/2019 185.47 126001 10111 Breshears Inc. W. H. 10/07/2019 174.09 126055 10513 Pacific Gas & Elec- Non Util 10/21/2019 168.28 126045 10184 Clark Pest Control -Pest 10/21/2019 154.00 126064 10749 UPS 10/21/2019 139.76 126041 11086 Benefit Resource, Inc, 10/21/2019 125.00 126054 10450 Mikes Mowers 10/21/2019 120.83 126053 10439 McMaster-Can· Supply Co. 10/21/2019 1\3.55 126051 10799 William P. Kulik 10/21/2019 Retiree SOl reimbursement 109.97 126000 10681 ARC Document Solutions 10/07/2019 101.89 126002 10154 Calaveras Telephone Co. 10/07/2019 99.61 126015 10439 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 10/07/2019 83.93 126056 11004 Pacific Gas & Electric 10/21/2019 68.66 126023 11258 Vcrizon 10/07/2019 62.96 126052 10428 MC1 10/21/2019 37.85 126075 11147 Pacific Gas & Electric 10/25/2019 30.46 126040 1 0866 AT&T Teleconference Services 10121/2019 28.26 125998 10013 Acme Rigging and Supply Co. Inc. 10/07/2019 24.44 126044 10986 Cal~ Waste Recovery Systems, LLC 10/21/2019 2188 126012 10399 JS West Propane Gas 10/07/2019 22.88 126007 I 0288 Fastenal Co. 10/07/2019 20.88 126018 10515 Pacific Gas & Electric Co, 10/07/2019 10.51

Report Total: $ 536,056.48 PAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY HELLS HALF ACRE ROAD BOARD AGENDA REPORT

Date: November 21, 201g Staff: Susan Larson

SUBJECT: Hells Half Acre Road-Cultural Resources Study RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review and authorize the General Manager to sign the Professional Services Agreement with PAR Environmental Services, Inc. for Cultural Resources Studies along Hells Half Acre Roadway (5Ng5)-USFS

BACKGROUND AND/OR HISTORY: Hells Half Acre roadway sustained significant damage during the winter of 2017's catastrophic storm events. A portion of this roadway was washed away, making the road impassable. During this time, access to Donnells was accomplished by helicopter, crews on foot and off road vehicles.

Plans for the emergency road repairs were undertaken immediately following consultation with FERC and the USFS. Given the severity of the road damage, construction of a "temporary by-pass road" was chosen to go around the washed out section. Plans were prepared by Condor, and approved by the USFS. The alignment of the by-pass roadway skirted several recorded cultural resource sites, thus the USFS required cultural resources studies prior to construction. Approval of the studies then required approval from the State Office of Historic Preservation. Tri-Dam was also required that to have a cultural resources monitor onsite at all times during construction.

Unfortunately, direction was given to increase the road width in several areas without authorization. The USFS issued a stop work notice, and suspended the cultural resources monitor and consulting firm (HDR) from working on the Stanislaus Region for a period of time, until it could be demonstrated that they took no part in violating the permit provisions.

The emergency road repairs were then completed, and the USFS Forest Supervisor required that TricDam provide an engineering analysis of four (4) alternatives for the permanent roadway. That work was performed by Condor and submitted to the USFS. Tri-Dam received authorization in August 2019 that the USFS elected to move forward Alternative 4; to improve the by-pass and to abandon the damaged portions of 5N95. (Letter Attached) Three (3) additional steps are needed, as noted in this letter:

1. Tri-Dam must proceed with the State Historic Preservation (SHPO) process. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with mitigation is likely.

2. Tri-Dam shall complete a National Environmental Policy Act process. While there is no Categorical Exclusion category related to roads, a streamlined Environmental Assessment is possible. The actual decision authority rests with the Forest Supervisor. (Note: Awaiting receipt of USFS relevant examples).

3. Once the SHPO and NEPA processes are complete, the Forest Supervisor will make the final decision regarding the long term use of 5N95 as the permanent road, assigning the correct operational level.

Tri-Dam obtained a copy of work for the required Cultural Resources studies from the USFS and circulated an Request for Proposal (RFP) to three (3) firms, all recommended by the USFS. (RFP's sent out on October 3, 2019). Two proposals were received:

a. PAR Environmental Services $ 39,631 b. Far Western Anthropological Research Group $104,271 Tri-Dam asked the USFS to review the PAR Environmental Services proposal, and the USFS advised that they found PAR's proposal to be comprehensive in all required study area. Staff recommends that PAR Environmental Resources be selected to perform this work, and authorize the General Manager to sign the Professional Services Agreement.

2019 Hells Half Acre Studies Budget: $60,000.00 PAR Study Proposal: $39,631.00

ATTACHMENTS: USFS Letter Dated August 12, 2019 PAR Environmental Services Proposal: Professional Services Agreement

Board Motion: Motion by:------Second by:------VOTE: Kamper (Yes/No) Holbrook (Yes/No) Holmes (Yes/No) Roos (Yes/No) Weststeyn (Yes/No)

Orvis (Yes/No) Altieri (Yes/No) DeBoer (Yes/No) Doornenbal (Yes/No) Santos (Yes/No)

Action(s) to be taken: USDA United Sta'l-es Fm•est Padfio Southwest Region 19777 Greenley Rond ~ Department of Set·vice Stanislaus National Forest Sonom, CA 95370 MW Agr!CJ~lture 2.09.,532.-3671 TDD; 209•533·97.65 Fax: ~09-53~-:tl!i\ld ·· DMl P fW J~: CT ~ IWG 19 PM 12: S&. File Code: 7730 Date: August 12, 2019.. ·. Jeff Shields Interim General MEillager Tri -dam Prqj ect ., P.O. Bo.x 11~8 Pinecrest, CA 953 75

Peat· Mr. Shields;

Earlier tbis sprllrg, Tri-Dani provided a 'copy of-a Condor package .dated November 12·, 20 i 8, to the Stanislaus National Forest. The package '!l'as originally sent during the 35 day goveJ:mnent 'ftidoug!'J>in early 2019 and was ~nissed by Forest staff. The pacl,i'Rge Wall. re-sep.t after our discussion at the Elllnllal Beardsley-Dorm:ell FERC license meeting in May, 2019. The s1Jbject package eontai!J.S a report Qfthe pote11.tial road i.mp!·ovement alter11atives regarding both Tti-Dam, access needs f1I'Ui road maintenance, along with continued public access. : . . .As you know, SigJ.Jificant (!amage 'Cb Road 5N95 ocou:rred drtring tb.e winter stom1s in 2011. T:ti­ Dam subS5qu

1. No ACtion: QOntinue to use>and maintain the as...eonstntcted by-pass~ . ··' 2. Btidg<:i.fue miginal slld.e area and ab!l;\ld9n the by-pass l'Oad. ;

3. Providf! wid

Forest staff hav:e recently C()mpletely their review of the alte;matives. presented. The Coopei:ati.ve Road Plan and Maintenance Agreement for 1:he Beardsley J Do1mells (FERC #2005-0 12), SectiyRepairs, was tGfel:tmced .. Consideration·was given to public sllfel;y, long tenu uae of the road, e:o.v)i:oliroenlal irnp!il~t~, Ellld coat. 'Balled on the!!e factors, it is my decision to JnoVe forward with i.mpletttel1\atioq of Altermttive 4·; that is, to impr9Ve the by-pass and to aban(ion the drunaged portim1 9f 5N95. ... Moving £:orwi!Xd, .the foll9wing steps lll't;l needed:

1, T:d-Drun must pxoceed with'tl;ie StateHistoricPr~servation Office (Sfl.PO) process. A · Memorandtun of Understanding (MOU) with mitigation'is likely.

Caring for the Lnnd at;d Serving People Jeff Shields 2

: . '

.. • 1. ' 2. Tri-Dam shall complete a National Enviroxunental P.olioy Act process. Whlle tb.ere is no CategoP:cal Exclusion·categolj related to roadS, a streamllned Environmental Assessment is possible. The actufl.) deci~ion authority remains with the Forest Sup6nrisor. 3. On~e the SHPO and NEPA processes are complete, I wift make a final decision regarding the long term me of 5N95 as th,e pennanent road, assigning :fue oor,rect operatioriallevel.

Both the: Forest !Uid the public have bee(! very lntere$ted in ge~ access re-opened sooner rather than later. As we move through the prMess steps above, I. am willing to opet;t 1M by-pass .road to the public with adequate safety signing regarding 1M narrow road a,nd steep grade section of the road (MtiTCD WS-1 and W7-~P signs on both appr9aches) . •.. Trl-Danl rernainl! responsible for all.costs associated with the process identified above. · After. reviewing this letter, p~ease confirm your plan~ to move forwaxd accordingly~. Dmft publio sigrli:ri,g language should be ~bmitted fo:r: staff review. t look fotwwd to g~tt:lhg the ro!ld open (with safetY mitigation sighing) by mid-September at the latest. · Please conta.ct Public SeLVioe Staff Officer ~~thMa.rl:fuez at beth.martinir,@usda.goy or by phone·at (2o9) 288-6,307 if you hiwe an¥ questions. . . · ·

. Thank yo11 again fur tlie subrirlttal! Sincerely;

II I • ··, ...... ~ .; .. .·c. ,.· ,. ... . •'j, •• . .·:: ·.;' •. . .

SPNKUIKEN . . I . , Forest Supervisor ..

cc: Beth Martinez, Sarah LaPlante

. ' ·.• PAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Cu ltural Resource Management • Bi ology • Environmental Plan nin g

£5TABl.ISHED 1981 October 23, 2019

Susan Larson Tri-Dam Project License Compliance P.O. Box 1158 Pinecrest, CA, 95364

RE: Archaeological Services for the Tri-Dam Project, USFS Hells Half Acre Bypass Road (PAR Ref 130-19- 37}

Dear Ms. Larson :

PAR Environmental Services, Inc. is pleased to submit the attached proposal to assist the Tri-Dam Project in meeting the Stanislaus National Forest (SNF) with their Section 106 requirements for Hells Half Acre Access Road Project in Tuolumne County. PAR is a small, woman-owned business enterprise (WBE) California S-Corporation headquartered in Sacramento, Ca lifornia. We are certified by the California Public Utilities Commission as a WBE.

We have worked in Tuolumne County and for the United States Forest Service for many years. My partner and I started the business in 1982 and have been working principals for over 35 years. We bring an in­ depth knowledge of local resources, on-going working relationships built through many years with local agencies and historical societies, and long-standing respect and interactions with local tribes. Most ofthe staff have been with PAR at least five years and are highly respected in their specialized fields.

Our most recent work in the region was completed for private developers and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. We've completed Phase II evaluations five sites within the Spring Gap-Stanislaus Hydroelectric System for PG&E in Tuolumne County, including evaluation of a work camp and the Stanislaus Railroad. This project included assessing effects of proposed PG&E undertakings on the eligible sites and preparing related documentation. We also completed site and built environment evaluations and affect assessments for structures within the Pinecrest community. We conducted surveys of the West Point­ Valley Springs and Electra transmission lines and competed Phase II evaluations of 17 historical sites along the routes, including a French Hospital, many ditches and mining remains, a powerhouse and associated work camps, several homesteads, and the remnants of the Campo Seco Wagon Road. In past years we have conducted studies, recorded, and evaluated logging railroad systems and associated work camps on the Tahoe, Plumas, Lassen, and Stanislaus national forests and are experienced in evaluating these types of work-related resources. All work on these projects was subject to review and acceptance by the SNF and by the SHPO.

1'. 0 . Bo\ I flO;'% • S.lt ra nw nto, C1 lifornia 95~ 1 ll·07% • ('.> 16) i~9-trl~b • FAX (9 16 ) 7":\9-06211 http: I I ww w . PA Rcnv iron nwn t.ll cnm Hells Half Acre Bypass Road Proposal Page2 Transmittal Letter {10/23/2019) PAR Environmental Services, Inc.

Through many years of working In the Sierra Nevada within the parameters of Section 106, we have developed efficient ways to record and evaluate sites. Typically, we use probes, metal detectors, on-site cataloging, and other methods In the field to assess historical sites. Combinations of shovel probes, on­ site lithic analysis, and other methods are employed at pre-contact sites. We are also experienced In examining past, present, and proposed future undertaldngs and their effect on the character-defining elements of eligible historic properties.

In the past we have worked under contract direct to the SNF and have also been Involved or responsible for numerous projects that have required procuring ARPA permits from the SNF and having our work pass through the heritage resource officers Inspections. We understand the SNF protocols and their Programmatic Agreement conditions, know both Kathy Strain and Lisa DeHart, and have had our work reviewed by one or both of them numerous times. We are pleased that our work consistently goes through SNF and SHPO review with little or no revisions. We have a good track record with agencies and SHPO and are proud of our achievements.

We appreciate you taking the time to review our packet. Please let me know if you need additional Information or have any questions on our submittal.

Cordially PAR Environmental Services, Inc.

Mary L Manlery President

!W. 13\>x 160756 • Sacramento, Califomia 95816-071>6 • (916) 739-8356 • FAX (916) 739·0626 hllp: // www.I'ARenvil·onnwntal.com PROPOSAL TO CONDUCT ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT THREE HISTORIC SITES WITHIN STANISLAUS NATIONAL FOREST FOR THE HELLS HALF ACRE ACCESS ROAD PROJECT, TUOLUMNE COUNTY, CA

Prepared for:

Trl-Dam Project PO Box 1158 Pinecrest, CA 95364

Prepared by:

PAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. PO Box 160756 Sacramento, CA 95816

October 23, 2019 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ...... 1

Task 1: Management...... 1 Task 2: Archival Research ...... l Task 3: Fieldwork ...... 1 Task 4. Report Preparation ...... 4 COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS ...... 4 PAR STAFF ...... 5 PAR'S EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES ...... 9 Scheduling ...... ll

Appendices Appendix A. Fee Schedule Appendix B. Resumes

IPARRVICES!NC. October 23, 2019 INTRODUCTION

PAR Environmental Services, Inc. (PAR) is pleased to submit this proposal to complete Phase II archaeological studies and effect determinations for three archaeological sites within the Stanislaus National Forest, Tuolumne County, CA. The sites are summarized In Table 1. PAR understands that the work will be conducted for Tri-Dam Project and will be reviewed by the Stanislaus National Forest (SNF). PAR maintains an extensive in-house library relevant to Stan'1slaus National Forest resources and the Sugar Pine Railroad and will draw on our sources and previous archaeological data as much as possible for the evaluations.

Table 1. Archaeological Sites Proposed for Additional Work and Effects Assessments Trinomial Other Description Required Work Effort (CA-) Designation TUOc3750H FS-05-16-51- Bumblebee Camp 1 Update record, reassess subsurface 0675 deposits under Criterion D, assess affects of 2017 road construction TU0-1456H FS 05-16-51- Segment 432J of Sugar Pine Update record, assess affects of 2017 0281 Railroad road construction TU0·1766H FS 05-16-51- Bumblebee Camp 1 Debris Rerecord site, test refuse deposits for 0288 Scatter subsurface Integrity, evaluate under all NRHP criteria, assess affects of2017 road construction

TASK 1: MANAGEMENT

This task includes hours for administration, billing, and coordination with the client and the SNF. It also includes preparation of a brief research design, necessary for the ARPA permit application. PAR will apply for an ARPA permit from the United States Forest Service (USFS) to conduct the work. We assume that there Is no need for a Native American monitor, given the historical nature of the sites, but have experience working with local tribes and monitors, should the SNF require monitors.

TASK 2: ARCHIVAL RESEARCH

PAR will draw on existing In-house data and provided information (such as the Sugar Pine Railroad context) as much as possible during the evaluation. However, we have anticipated a total of one day of research at the USFS Supervisor's and District offices (focused on Sugar Pine Railroad).

TASI< 3: FIELDWORK

In 2017 construction of an access road occurred that may have adversely affected three sites along the route. Tri-Dam has been asked by SNF to conduct additional work to fully document the sites, 1

October 23, 2019 document the new construction completed to date, use this information to reevaluate the sites in light of the road construction effects, and determine if the 2017 construction adversely affected the character­ defining traits at the site. The three sites represent the logging railroad segment and a related work camp. We understand that ascertaining the continuity between sites and their relationship Is an Important part oft he work.

Fieldwork will focus on comparing the previous site records and sketch maps against the current conditions at each site to assess if any adverse effects occurred as a result of the construction effort. We will update the existing information, remap the sites, if necessary, and use a combination of metal detection, scaled drawings of selected features, map revisions, limited Shovel Test Units, and on-site cataloging to document the current conditions. PAR does not anticipate collecting any artifacts, and curatlon fees are not Included In this scope. Artifacts will be cataloged on site and left in situ. We anticipate the following field effort at each site.

CA·TU0-3550H {FS 05-16-53-0675)

CA·TU0-3750H Is characterized as a Sugar Pine Railroad logging work camp containing numerous structural features and associated refuse. The site was occupied Intermittently from 1900 to 1940 and at one time housed 145 men In tents and cabins, with a cookhouse, shop, operational equipment, and other features. The site, as documented in 2017 by Risse, contains three loci with structural remains, privy pit, cabin foundations, a corral, and debris. Named Bumblebee Camp #1, the site has been determined eligible for listing In the National Register under criteria A and D. Character-defining traits Included visible features and clearly defined activity areas (loci); distinct association with the railroad grade; heavily wooded and remote setting; refuse that can address questions regarding changing llfeways, ethnic make­ up, camp layout and design, technologies, and economic statu.s (Risse 2017).

In order to assess the current condition of the site PAR proposes the following: • Compare the existing site Information prepared by Risse 2017 and the SNF in the 1990s to the current site; • Use a sub-meter Trimble to map any portion of the site that has been altered since 2017; • Metal detect features and loci to identify scattered material as a result of road construction or subsurface potential; • Prepare scaled sketch maps of any features that appear changed since the earlier recording efforts; • Test the refuse deposits by using up to five 2-foot-square test units to assess If the site still contains adequate information to address the research domains listed in 2017; • Catalog artifacts from the units and check loci debris against the previous site records; • Assess changes to the setting, feeling, and association with the other sites and the railroad segment. • Update the existing record on DPR 523 forms, as appropriate. 2

I!?ARRVICESINC. October 23, 2019 CA-TU0-1456/H (FS 05-16-53-0281}

Segment453-J of the Sugar Pine Railroad site was recorded and evaluated by the SNF in the 1990s. The railroad has been found eligible for Inclusion In the NRHP. Proposed work at this site Includes:

• Compare the existing site information prepared by the SNF in the 1990s to the current site; • Use a sub-meterTrimbleto map any portion of the site that has been altered since 2017; • Metal detect the segment to identify scattered material as a result of road construction; • Prepare scaled sketch maps of any features (trestles, fill) that appear changed since the earlier recording efforts; • Assess changes to the setting, feeling, and association with the other; • Update the existing record on DPR 52.3 forms, as appropriate.

CA-TU0-1766H {FS 05-16-53-0288}

Site TU0-1766H was recorded by the SNF in 1980 and contained three rectangular depressions (one filled with refuse). skid trails, haul roads, and a structure. The features were aligned on both sides of a dirt road and appear associated with Bumblebee Camp #1 and the Sugar Pine Railroad. The site has not been rerecorded since 1980 and has not been evaluated under NRHP criteria. We proposed the following work effort at this site.

• Compare the existing site information prepared by SNF in 1980 to the current site; • Resurvey the site to identify past features and ascertain the presence of additional features; • Remap the site using a sub-meter Trimble to current Industry standards; • Metal detect features to identify scattered material as a result of road construction or subsurface potential; • Prepare scaled sketch plans any features with structural elements or character-defining traits; • Obtain current photographs of features and overviews of the site; • Catalog and record representative samples of artifacts by function; paying particular attention to maker's marks or diagnostic technological characteristics to assist in dating the deposit; • Test refuse deposits by using up to six 2-foot-square test units to assess presence or absence of subsurface material; • Use a fiberglass probe in depressions to assess potential depth and, if uncertain, use an auger to ascertain fu nctlon;

3

October 23, 2019 • Assess changes to the setting, feeling, and association with Bumblebee Camp 1 and the railroad segment. • Record the site on DPR 523 forms, as appropriate.

TASK 4. REPORT PREPARATION

PAR will prepare an evaluation report to Section 106 standards documenting the fieldwork and assessing or reassessing the eligibility of the sites in light of National Register criteria (particularly A, C, and D) and the USFS Region 5 Programmatic Agreement. DPR 523 forms will be updated or prepared, based on new data and will be attached as an appendix. PAR will submit the draft report, including appended DPR forms and other relevant data, to Tri·Dam for review. PAR will address any comments on the draft and will produce a revised report for submittal to the SNF. PAR will then address the SNF comments and produce a final evaluation report. PAR anticipates producing five copies of the final report for distribution to the SNF, SHPO, and Central California Information Center.

Once the recommendations of the evaluation report are accepted by the SNF, PAR will prepare a Finding of Effect, based on the road being left In place. The analysis will follow criteria for effect outlined in Section 106 and will use the field data to analysis changes to integrity and alterations of character· defining elements of the site. If the effects appear adverse, the document will provide appropriate treatment options. If a Finding of Adverse Effect is recommended, PAR will prepare a Memorandum of Agreement that stipulates treatment measures required to resolve the effects. We understand that the MOA requires negotiation with the SNF and the SHPO and agreement to the conditions by Tri·Dam Projects.

PAR will prepare a draft letter for SHPO consultation, requesting concurrence on the reassessment of eligibility, Finding of Effect, and the MOA. We understand that the SNF, as lead federal agency, is responsible for consultation with SHPO and will be ultimately responsible for submitting the package to the SHPO.

COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS

PAR Environmental Services, Inc. (PAR) is a small, Public Utilities Commission-certified, woman· owned California $-Corporation headquartered in Sacramento, Callfornla. PAR has been In business since 1982 and Is a financially sound, .California $-corporation. PAR's founders, James G. and Mary L. Maniery, are often "hands-on" principals, acting as project managers, field directors and report writers, as well as Company owners. PAR maintains a permanent staff of9, Including planners and cultural resource speciallsts. The PAR cultural team is well rounded, with specla\Jsts in prehistory, ethnography, geoarchaeology, history, archttectural history, and historical archaeology, many of whom have been with PAR for overfive years. This

4

October 23, 2019 staff continuity and experience allows PAR to take a cohesive team approach to projects and guarantees clients available and experienced personnel in case of emergency situations.

Since 1984 the firm has completed over 250 projects for utility companies including PG&E, Tri­ Dam, El Dorado Irrigation District, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), Lassen Municipal Utility District (LMUD), Nevada Irrigation District, Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), Escondido-Vista Irrigation District, Western Power Administration, and California Energy Commission. PAR has tested both prehistoric and historical sites for NRHP significance, recorded and evaluated existing hydroelectric and logging-related features (substations, dams, canals, powerhouses, and transmission lines, etc.) and associated residential and construction camps, prepared HABS/HAER documentation, monitored PG&E and SMUD construction activities, and prepared Findings of Effect and Memorandum of Agreements and other management documents for Section 106 and FERC compliance.

PARs principals began their careers with the US Forest Service and the company has over 35 years of experience working within the Forest Service framework. We have completed numerous projects for PG&E at Pinecrest and at various locations related to the Spring Gap-Stanislaus Project; ail have been subjected to SNF review. We have also worked for Caltrans, private developers, CaiFire, and the SNF in Tuolumne County and are very familiar with the logging railroads, logging camps, and work the SNF has been doing on the Sugar Pine and other railroads within their forest. We are adept at working with the SNF Programmatic Agreement conditions and are familiar with the SNF requirements for GIS products.

In the last ten years PAR has worked extensively with various energy companies towards renewal of numerous FERC licenses as well as FERC boundary adjustments, as well as with the Forest Service. Work has included Initial Inventory and evaluation of systems and archaeological resources, preparation of Finding of Effects, MOAs and Pas, Historic Property Treatment Plans (HPTP) and Management Plans (HPMP), and implementation of these plans. PAR has experience In Calaveras and Tuolumne counties, including studies on PG&E's Mokelumne River and Stanislaus River projects, and work for EBMUD at Pardee and Camanche reservoirs. These projects included Inventory and evaluation of both built environment and archaeological resources, and compliance with FERC and the forest service. Work on these systems was conducted with review by FERC, SNF, the Office of Historic Preservation and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and various federal agencies (US Forest Services, Bureau of Land Management, US Army Corps and Engineers).

PAR STAFF

Our in-house Cultural Resources Department has successfully completed complex projects Involving National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) properties requiring full compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act, NEPA, and CEQA regulations since 1982 (over 700 studies completed to date). Staff capabilities include geoarchaeology, prehistoric and historical archaeology, obsidian studies, historical 5

October 23, 2019 studies, evaluations of architectural and engineering resources, GIS services, and Native American consultation. We also provide public interpretive services (popular articles and pamphlets, museum exhibits and displays, video). Our cultural staff routinely prepares Natio.nal Register of Historical Places Determination of Eligibility, Finding of Effect, HABS/HAER documentation, Phase I, II and Ill studies, and Memorandum of Agreement documentation. All staffmeets Secretary of Interior Standards for their relevant field.

Mary Maniery, M.A. - Principal Investigator (Historical Archaeology, Architectural History, History) Register of Professional Archaeologists Secretary of Interior Professional Standards for History, Architectural History, Archaeology

Ms. Manlery has B.A. degrees In History and Anthropology and an M.A. degree in Anthropology from California State University, Chico. She has been working as an historian, architectural historian, and historical archaeologist in California, and eight other western and midwestern states since 1976. She has worl

James Gary Maniery, CFO, Environmental Planning Register of Professional Archaeologists Secretary of Interior Professional Standards for Archaeology

James G. Maniery will serve as Project Administrator. Mr. Maniery brings 40years of experience to the project team and has worked for many clients within Calaveras and Tuolumne counties. Since 1975, he has also conducted academic research within Amador, Calaveras, and Tuolumne counties; publishing several articles, papers, and a book on the Northern and Central Sierra Mewuk. Mr. Maniery brings an intimate knowledge of the overall environmental process to the team and experience In preparing NEPA and CEQA sections for environmental documents. He understands the need for viable and cost-effective project approaches and team approaches to project implementations. 6

lfAl\RvrcEsJNc. October 23, 2019 Andrea "Ellie" Maniery - Project Manager, Senior Archaeologist (Prehistory, Geoarchaeology, Lithlcs) Register of Professional Archaeologists Secretary of Interior Professional Standards for Archaeology

Ms. Maniery holds a B.A. degree In Anthropology and an M.A. degree In Anthropology with a geoarchaeology emphasis from University of Nevada, Reno and has eight years of professional experience. She has worked on Intensive surveys, test excavations, and data recovery projects for prehistoric and historical sites In California, Nevada, and Utah, cataloged and prepared collections, and prepared Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms for numerous archaeological sites throughout California. She serves as a co-PI, project manager, and field director at PAR. Ms. Maniery has worked on the Electra Transmission Line project, the Mokelumne River Hydroelectric System, Spring Gap-Stanislaus Hydroelectric System, and the Yuba-Bear and Drum-Spaulding Hydroelectric Projects Relicenslng efforts. She has conducted several investigations of historic resources in foothill settings, lncludln.g at Jamestown and south of Camanche Reservoir.

John Dougherty - Senior Prehistoric Archaeologist (Native American Consultation, Lithic Analysis) Register of Professional Archaeologists Secretary of Interior Professional Standards for Archaeology

Mr. Dougherty holds B.A. and M.A. degrees In Anthropology and has over 40 years' experience as a California archaeologist. Mr. Dougherty's particular expertise lies In lithic analysis and prehistoric archaeology. He has worked on numerous Federal, state, city and county projects for a wide variety of clients throughout California, Nevada, and Oregon. He has directed Phase II and Phase Ill excavations at prehistoric and historical sites throughout the state and evaluated impacts from various projects on lithic scatters, middens, can scatters, and other types of sites. He has worked on the Upper North Fork Feather River Hydroelectric system, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation Alert program, New Hogan Reservoir, Pardee Reservoir, Don Pedro Reservoir, Spring Gap­ Stanislaus and Mokelumne River hydroelectric systems.

7

I!:ARRVfCESfNC. October 23, 2019 Josh Allen -Associate Archaeologist II

Josh Allen works as one of PARs Associate Archaeologists and is responsible for leading crews in the field, project management, research, organization, and assists with final report preparat ion. Mr. Allen holds a B.S. degree in Anthropology from the University of Idaho and is currently completing his M .S. in Anthropology from Central Washington University. He has worked on Electra Transmission Line project, the HL Solar Project in Lassen County, and on five FERC license d hydroelectric system surveys in the Sierras and Coast Ranges for PG&E and NID. Mr. Allen has served as crew chief, or lead archaeo logist on seve ral Phase 1 projects, prehistoric site testing and evaluation in Humboldt County, construction monitoring for PG&E throughout northern and Central Ca lifornia, form preparation, and report w riting. Recently he served as PARs Field Director for surveys of several hundred miles of transmission lines in three counties and a challenging survey of 5,000 acres in the redwood forests in Humboldt and Del Norte counties.

Geordon Taylor- Associate Archaeologist I

Mr. Taylor joined PAR in August of 2017. He holds a B.A. degree in Anthropology from Fort Lewis College in Colorado an d has a certificate in Cultural Resou rces Management. His responsibilities at PAR have included co nducting technical inventory, testing, data analysis, evaluation, and other studies for archaeological sites, historic structures, historic, and prehistoric resources. He was responsible for spearheading laboratory process ing and analysis of material from six sites for the United States Marine Corps Twenty-Nine Palms curation facility and works with PARs Access database for co llection ma nagement .

Amber Rankin- GIS Administrator/Graphic Artist

Ms. Rankin holds a MFA degree in Animat ion from San Fra ncisco Academy of Arts and has been with PAR for eight years. She is in charge of PARs GIS Department and is adept at integrating field data, client dat a, information from historical maps and documents into the GIS system and adopting it for individual client needs. She also works with PAR staff in designing pamphlets, brochures, exhibits, posters, and other public interpretive documents.

Jessica O'Connor- Administrative Assistant

Ms. O'Connor has worked intermittently for PAR since 2007. She is in charge of PAR's Administrative duties, such as word processing of all reports and correspondence, processing incoming and outgoing mail, and answering phones. She worked closely with Gary Maniery, PAR's CFO, completing coordination of all correspondence. She oversees layout and production of reports, monitors and maintains in-house library and environmental files. Supervises production team and assists with inner-office technical support.

8

October 23, 2019 PAR'S EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES

PAR has been working in Tuolumne County and on USFS projects since 1982. To date, the company has worked on 15 hydroelectric systems under FERC licensing (Including Mokelumne River, Electra, Spring Gap-Stanislaus systems In Amador, Calaveras, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne Counties) and prepared or assisted with HPMP preparation for three of these. We are well versed In the unique requirements of FERC, as well as the local resource base around Camanche Reservoir, and feel confident that we can meet or exceed the contract stipulations In a timely and cost-efficient manner. In addition, PAR principal, James G. Maniery, assisted with early work on Camanche Reservoir with Sacramento State under direction of Jerry Johnson and focused his Master's thesis work on the Central Sierra Mlwok experience after the gold rush.

Below are examples ofPAR'sslmllarwork in Calaveras and Tuolumne counties. These selections serve to showcase the range of experience and understanding of the region and the project's requirements.

Project: Cultural Resources Inventory, Survey, and Extended Phase I and Phase II Investigations for the Electra- Valley Springs Capaclty/Reconductor Project, Amador and Calaveras Counties, California Client: Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Far Western Anthropological Group Contact information: Angela Vounie, Far Western Phone: 530.756.3941 ext. 119 Email: [email protected] Location: Amador and Calaveras Counties Dates: 2016-2018 Relevant Staff: Mary L. Maniery, Andrea E. Manlery

PG&E proposed pole, conductor, and appurtenant equipment replacement along an 11-mile-long section of the existing West Point-Valley Springs 60-kilovolt (kV) electric transmission line (WPVS line) In Amador and Calaveras Counties, California. PAR teamed with Far Western (FW) and ICF International to complete records searches, background research, extensive archival searches, and consolidation of duplicate sites resulted In the Identification of 52 previously recorded cultural resources. Par conducted additional Phase II work at 17 historical sites within or adjacent to the Area of Potential impact {API) related to mining, hydroelectric development, early medical facilities, emigrant trails, and homesteading. Together with their teaming companies, PAR's detailed notes and records were used to prepare the Historic Resource Inventory forms and co-author the Section 106 evaluation report with Far Western. Work and findings were accepted by SHPO.

9

October 23, 2019 Project: Cultural Resource Inventory for the Pi necrest Tra nsportation, Ci rculation, and Parking Project Stanislaus National Fo rest, Tu olu mne County, California ARR#05-16-3352 Client: Pacific Gas and Electric Company; United States Forest Service, Stanislaus National Forest Contact information: PG&E: Mike Taggert; 2730 Gateway Oaks, Suite 220, Sacramento, CA 95833 Phone: 916-923-7047 Email: [email protected] m Location: Tu olumne County, CA Dates: 2012 Relevant Staff: Mary L. Maniery

PAR conducted cu ltural resources inventory and archival resea rch at nine locat ions within Pinecrest for review by Stanislaus National Forest. Work was done in accordance with t he SNF PA and Historic Properties Management Plan protocols. Tasks included a records search and archival research, coordination with the SNF (ARPA permit, etc), archaeological survey and recording of all newly found and previously recorded resources, a finding of effect document, and a cultural resources report. All work was subject to review by PG&E and SNF in compliance with Section 106 and was reviewed and accepted by SHPO.

Project: National Register of Historic Places Evalu ation of Five Archaeological Sites Associated with t he Spring Gap-Stanislaus Hydroelectric System, Tuolumne County, Ca lifornia (F ERC No. 2130) Client: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Contact information: PG&E: Mike Taggert; 2730 Gat eway Oaks, Suite 220, Sacrame nto, CA 95833 Phone: 916-923-7047 Email: [email protected] Location: Tuolumne County, CA Dates: 2016 Relevant Staff: Mary L. Maniery, Andrea E. Maniery

PAR has been working on the Spri ng Gap-Sta nislaus Hydroelectric System in Tuolumne and Stanislaus counties since 1999. We evaluated all built environment and engineering features related to the hydroelectric operat ion, prepared a detailed histori cal context of the system, and conducted archaeological surveys as part of relicensing efforts. Recent wo rk in 2016-2017 consisted of eva luating f ive historical resources within the FERC boundaries including two powerhouse camps, a t ramway, and ot her work camps related to the development and ope ration of the syst em, particularly at Camp 9. This work included evaluation and assessment of t he Stanislaus Railroad.

PAR conducted archiva l research and provided National Register evaluations of the five historical work camp sites related to hydroelectric development and railroad co nstruction and operations. PAR followed the guidelines of an existing PA between SNF, FERC and SHPO and the Project's Historic Properties Management Plan. Evaluation work included documenting architectural and archaeological resources, 10

October 23, 2019 shovel tests, laboratory analysis of historic artifacts, and detailed clearing and mapping of features. A Native American Monitor was present during all sub-surface investigations. All work was subject to review by PG&E and Stanislaus Nations Forest In compliance with Section 106 and CEQA.

Project: Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation for Camanche Surplus Property, Calaveras, Amador, and San Joaquin Counties, CA (FERC Project 2916) Client: East Bay Municipal Utility District Contact information: EBMUD: Joe Tam; P.O. Box 24055, Oakland, CA, 94607 Phone: (510) 287·6127 Email: [email protected] Location: Calaveras, Amador, and San Joaquin Counties CA Dates: 2019 Relevant Staff: Mary L. Manlery, Andrea E. Maniery, Geordon Taylor

PAR conducted archival research, cultural resources Inventories, Phase II testing, and provided National Register of Historic Places evaluations of nine sites in Calaveras County. PAR prepared a Finding of No Adverse Effect for the project. Evaluation work included mapping, research at historical societies, analysis of archaeological resources, metal detection, and shovel testing. All work was subject to review by EBMUD, FERC, and the SHPO in compliance with Section 106 and CEQA.

SCHEDULING

PAR can begin work immediately. We believe that time is of the essence In preparing and submitting an ARPA permit application. Ideally, fieldwork will occur In early November, prior to the inset of winter weather. We will work with Tri-Dam to prepare a realistic schedule of deliverables once the contract is awarded and in consideration of weather restraints.

11

IEARRVICESINC. October 23, 2019 APPENDICES Appendix A Fee Schedule Archaeological W(ll'k for Hells Half Acre Acoess Road Prepared f(ll' Trl-Dam Project 10/23/2019 (130-19-37) I TaskiPersonnel Function Rate'hr. Hours Total

Pro] ect M anagement/CQ(ll'dlnatlon/ARPA Permit M. L Maniary Principal $165.00 4 $660 J. G. Manlary Principal $160.00 4 $640 AEManiery &'. Archaeologist $90.00 16 $1,440 Total $2,740 f(ll'est Service Research AEManiery &'.Archaeologist $90.00 10 $900 Total $900 Fleldw(ll'k M. L.. Manlery Principal $165.00 40 $6,600 AEManiery &'. Archaeologist $90.00 40 $3,600 G Teylor AsrociateArch. $70.00 40 $2,800 A. Rmkin G/&GraphicArl/st $90.00 2 $180 Total $13,180 Phase II Evaluation Rep(ll't M.L .. MElliery Principal $165.00 16 $2,640 AE Ma'liery &'.Archaeologist $90.00 80 $7,200 G. Teylor Asrociate Arch. $70.00 48 $3,360 A. Rankin GJS'GraphicArtlst $90.00 24 $2,160 J. O'Connor Arimin Assist $65.00 8 $520 Total $16,880 Finding cl Effect Preparation M. L .. Mmiery Principal $165.00 8 $1,320 AEManiery &'. Archaeologist $90.00 28 $2,520 A. Rankin Graphic Artist $90.00 2 $180 Total $2,700 MOAJSHPO Transmittal Preparation M. L.. Manlary Principal $165.00 4 $660 AEManiery &'.Archaeologist $90.00 20 $1,800 Total $1,000

TOTAL LABOR $37,200 Expenses Mileage $0.58 750 $435 Hotel (assumed Pinecrest Lelort) $190.00 4 $760 Per Diem $55.00 13 $715 Trimble Fee $55.00 5 $150 Dupll call on $0.15 2000 $150 Total $2,210 Fee $221 Total Estimated Co5t-Cultural Resources $39,631

:;g;'Y;:,~ 23-0ct-19 Mary L. Mmiery DEta Preeidalt PAR EnvironmenteJ Services, Inc. Appendix B Resumes PAR MARY L. MANIERY PO Box 160756 Sacramento, CA 95816-0756 CEO / DIRECTOR CULTURAL RESOURCE DEPARTMENT mlmainery@yahoocom (916) 739-8367 (direct)

Education Technical Experience M.A. Anthropology California State University, Chico, Ms. Maniery has served as the President of PAR and the head of the 1980 Cultural Resources Department for the past 37 years. She conducts B.A. History technical inventory, testing, evaluation, data analysis, effect assessments, California State University, Chico, 1979 agreement documents, and other studies for archaeological sites, historic B.A. Anthropology structures, and historical resources. Ms. Maniery prepares cultural California State University, Chico, resource sections of Environmental Impact Reports/Statements, Initial 1976 Studies, and Environmental Assessments for numerous commercial and Technical Skills residential developments; redevelopment projects; transportation; power, water, and utilities projects, and BRAC closures. • Historical Archaeology Relevant Experience • Architectural History • Upper Level Management Ms. Maniery has conducted surveys for prehistoric and historical • Technical Editor archaeological sites and historic buildings, National Register of Historic • Technical Writing Places district, structure, and site evaluations and nominations, Point of Historic Interest and State Historic Landmarks evaluations/nominations, Recent Experience historical research and overviews, Historic American Building Survey/Historic American Engineering Record documentation. Ms. • May 1982 -present: PAR Maniery has led coordination with state, federal, and local agencies in the Environmental Services, environmental review process for projects regulated by the CEQA, NEPA, Inc. NHPA, NAGPRA, and ARPA Her specialties are in historical archaeology, • january 1977- Apri/1982 military, hydroelectric and energy development history and archaeology, U.S.D.A Forest Service fo r Asian American history and archaeology and Section 106 compliance. Plumas and Mendocino National Forests Selected Publications and Professional Presentations Professional Memberships Ms. Maniery has authored over 350 technical reports, published articles and presented several papers on the history, architecture, and • Register of Professional archaeology of Asian communities in Northern California, hydroelectric Archaeologists ID # 11585 work camps, oil extraction in California, railroad logging in Plumas • Society fo r California County, work camps, homesteading, hydroelectric and energy Archaeology development in California, and mining in the northern Sierra. • Secretary of Interior Professional Standards­ She lead the Introduction to Historic-Era Artifact Identification Workshop Archaeology at the 2019 Society for California Archaeology meetings in Sacramento, • Society of Historical California. Archaeology PAR ANDREA "ELLIE" MANIERY PO Box 160756 Sacramento, CA 95816-0756 SENIOR ARCHAEOLOGIST [email protected] (916) 287- 9118 (direct) Education M.A. Anthropology Technical Experience Emphasis in Geoarchaeology University of Nevada, Reno, 2015 Ms. Maniery's responsibilities at PAR include conducting geoarchaeological investigations, technical inventory, preparing reports for compliance with B.A. Anthropology Section 106 and CEQA, proposal writing, archaeological testing, Section 106 Min or in Archaeology and CEQA compliance, data recovery, data analysis, project management, University of Nevada, Reno, 2012 and evaluation of historical and prehistoric resources. She has also prepared site records on IMACS and California 523 DPR forms, technical Technical Skills reports, research designs, and ARPA permits. Her geoarchaeological • Grain-Size Analysis expertise involved alluvial and Aeolian settings and reconstruction of • Buried Site Potential landform history. She has served as PAR's field director, co-PI, and project manager. Ms. Maniery meets the Secretary of the Interior's qualification • Artifact Analysis criteria as an archaeologist. • Trench Profile Technical nr~urinnc Relevant Experience Recent Experience

Since joining the PAR team, she has worked on intensive surveys, test • May 2015 - present: PAR excavations and data recovery projects for prehistoric and historical sites Environmental Services, Inc. in California, served in the lab managing collections and conducting • May 2014- August 2014: analysis on prehistoric and historic artifacts, assisted in monitoring PAR Environmental projects, and conducted coordination with Native American tribes. She Services, Inc. has worked on the Mokelumne River Hydroelectric System, Spring Gap­ • May2013 - August2013: Stanislaus Hydroelectric System, and has conducted several investigations Western Cultural Resources of historic resources in foothill settings, including at Jamestown and south Management, Sparks, NV. of Camanche Reservoir. Professional Memberships Selected Publications and Professional Presentations • Register of Professional 2019 Cultural Resources Inventory for the Campo Seco Corners, Archaeologists Tuolumne County, CA ID#37427866 2016 National Register of Historic Places Evaluation of Five • Society for California Archaeological Sites Associated with the Spring Gap-Stanislaus Archaeology Hydroelectric System, Tuolumne County, CA • Secretary of interior Professional Standards - In addition, Ms. Maniery has presented papers and posters at the Society Archaeology of California Archaeology, Nevada Archaeology Association, and Society of American Archaeology meetings. PAR GEORDON TAYLOR PO Box 160756 Sacramento, CA 95816-0756 ASSOCIATE ARCHAEOLOGIST [email protected] (916) 287- 9113 (direct)

Education Technical Experience • B.A. Anthropology • Certificate in Cultural Resource Mr. Taylor's responsibilities at PAR have included conducting technical Management inventory, testing, data analysis, evaluation, and other studies for • Fort Lewis College, 2016 archaeological sites, historic structures, historic and prehistoric resources, Section 106 and CEQA compliance, data recovery, data analysis, project management, evaluation of historical and prehistoric resources. He has also Technical Skills helped to prepare site records on IMACS and California 523 DPR forms, technical reports, research designs, and ARPA permits. • Lithic Analysis • Osteological Analysis, human, faunal, microfauna! Relevant Experience • Trimble GPS unit

Mr. Taylor's responsibilities at PAR have included conducting technical inventory, testing, data analysis, evaluation, and other studies for Recent Experience archaeological sites, historic structures, historic, and prehistoric resources. He was responsible for spearheading laboratory processing and analysis of • August 2018- Historical material from six historical sites for the United States Marine Corps Twenty­ Archaeology Workshop (3- Nine Palms curation facility and works with PARs Access database for day training) collection management. Mr. Taylor has gained experience through multiple • August2017- present:PAR internships working at the Philbrook Museum and working with micro­ Environmental Services, Inc. faunal assemblages. • August 2016- December 2016: Internship, analyzing a micro-faunal assemblage Selected Publications and Project Experience • June 2016- August 2016: 2019 Cultural Resources Inventory for the Campo Seco Corners, Subdivision, Internship, Philbrook Tuolumne County, CA Museum

2019 Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation for Camanche Surplus Property, Calaveras, Amador, and San joaquin Counties, CA (FERC Proj. 2916)

2019 Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the Greater Prairie Creek Management Unit, Humboldt County, CA

2019 Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the Greater Mill Creek Management Unity, Del Norte County, CA PAR Environmental Services, Inc. November 21,2019 Professional Services Agreement 2019·PSA·03

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is effective as of November 21, 2019 (the "Effective Date") by and between the Tri-Dam Project, a partnership ofthe Oakdale and South San Joaquin Irrigation Districts, irrigation districts governed by the provisions of Division 11 of the California Water Code (collectively, "Client"); and PAR Environmental Services, Inc. ("Consultant").

In consideration of the promises herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Services: Client and Consultant agree Consultant will perform the following general services: Archaeological Services for the Tri-Dam Project, USFS Hells Half Acre Bypass Road (5N95).

Services to be provided by Consultant and other work to be performed by Consultant ("Work") are specifically described in the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

Consultant's key personnel assigned to, and who shall be primarily responsible for carrying out the Work, are as follows:

Name Classification/Position Project Role Attached from Proposal 10/23/2019 (130-19-37)

Consultant may replace, substitute, reassign, or remove key personnel from the Work by written approval of Client. However, where key personnel are unable to perform the Work due to absence, leave, or termination of employment, Client approval shall not be required but Consultant shall notify Client of the change.

2. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective immediately and shall remain in effect unless amended pursuant to Section 18 or terminated pursuant to Section 19 herein.

3. Schedule for Performance. Consultant shall perform the Work as expeditiously as is consistent with generally accepted standards of professional skill and care and the orderly progress of work.

4. Compensation and Price Ceiling. The compensation to be paid by Client to Consultant for the Work shall be on a time and materials basis in accordance with the Rate and Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Rate and Fee Schedule shall be effective for

1 of 12 PAR Environmental Servloos, lno. November 21,2019 Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-03 the duration of performance of the Work, unless otherwise negotiated by the parties, approved by Client's Board of Directors, and consented to in writing by Client as an amendment to this Agreement.

Total compensation to Consultant for Work performed under this Agreement, including fees and expenses, shall not exceed the total price ceiling of: $39,631.00.

5. Invoicing and Payment. Consultant shall submit periodic invoices, not more frequently than monthly, for the services rendered during the preceding period. All invoices are to be sent to the Client's Accounts Payable department with the project name listed on the invoice, and must indicate the hours actually worked by each classification as well as all other directJy.related costs. Client shall approve or disapprove said invoice within ten (1 0) days following receipt thereof, and shall pay, within thirty (30) days' approval, all approved invoices. Client reserves the right to withhold payment of disputed specific items and shall give notice to the Consu~ant, pursuant to Section 6 herein, of all such disputed specific items within ten (1 0) days following receipt of billing or invoices. The parties shall exercise good faith and diligence in the resolution of any disputed invoiced amounts.

6. Notices. Any notices or other communications to be given to any party pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by delivering same In writing to the parties at the addresses set forth below:

"CLIENT" "CONSULTANT" Tri·Dam Project P.O. Box 1158 PAR Environmental Services, Inc. Pinecrest, California 95364-0158 Mary L. Maniery, President Attn: Jeffrey K. Shields, Interim PO Box 160756 General Manager Sacramento, CA 95816·0756 Telephone: (209) 965-3996 Telephone: (916) 739-8356 Facsimile: (209)965-44235 Facsimile: (916) 739-0626

With courtesy copies to:

Oakdale Irrigation District 1205 E. F Street Oakdale, California 95361 Attn: Steve Knell, General Manager Telephone: {209)847·0341 Facsimile: (209)847·3468

South San Joaquin Irrigation District P.O. Box747 Ripon, California 95366-0747 Attn: Peter M. Rietkerk, General Manager Telephone: (209) 249-4600 Facsimile: (209) 249-4688

Notice shall be deemed given when deposited into the United States mall, postage prepaid, addressed to the parties at the addresses above. Nothing shall preclude the giving of personal

2 of 12 PAR Environmental Services, Ino. November 21, 2019 Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA..Q3 notice or notice by e-mail or facsimile machine provided, however, that notice by e-mail or facsimile machine shall be followed by notice deposited into the United States mail as set forth above.

7. Independent Contractor: It is understood and agreed that Consultant is an independent contractor and nothing in this Agreement should be construed to create a partnership, joint venture, or employer-employee relationship: a. Consultant, in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, is subject to the control or direction of Client as to the designation of tasks to be performed, and the work to be accomplished but not the means, methods or sequence used by Consultant for accomplishing the work. Client shall have the right to guide the Consultant's work efforts, but not direct the results nor the manner or the means by which the work is performed. b. If, in the performance of this Agreement, any third persons are employed by Consultant, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. All terms of employment, including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging, or any other terms of employment or requirements of law, shall be determined by Consultant. c. Consultant and Consultant's employees are not authorized to act as agent for, or make any representation, contract, or commitment on behalf of Client. d. Consultant shall not be entitled to any benefits payable to employees of Client. e. Client will not make any deductions or withholdings from the compensation payable to Consultant under this Agreement, and will not withhold or make payments for social security; make unemployment insurance or disability insurance contributions; or obtain worker's compensation insurance on Consultant's behalf. f. Consultant will be solely responsible for all tax returns and payments required to be filed with or made to any federal, state or local tax authority with respect to Consultant's performance of services and receipt of fees under this Agreement. Consultant agrees to accept exclusive liability for complying with all applicable state and federal laws governing self-employed lndivid uals, including obligations such as payment of taxes, social security, disability and other contributions based on fees paid to Consultant, Its agents or employees under this Agreement. Consultant hereby agrees to indemnify and defend Client against any and all such taxes or contributions, including penalties and interest. · g. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds Client harmless from any and all claims that may be made against Client based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Agreement.

B. Authority of Consultant. It is understood that Consultant is to provide information, research, advice, recommendations and consulting services to Client. Consultant shall not possess any authority with respect to any decision of Client. Client is responsible for, and shall make all policy decisions related to, the Work performed by Consultant.

9. Potential Conflicts o·f Interest. a. Consultant shall disclose its involvement in any projects which may be directly affected by actions taken by Client based on the services provided hereunder. Consultant shall not write a proprietary specification for material, equipment, or service from companies in which it holds a beneficial interest. b. Consultant certifies that it has disclosed to Client any actual, apparent or potential conflicts of interest that may exist relative to the services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant hereby agrees to advise Client in writing of any actual,

3 of 12 PAR Environmental Services, Inc. November 21, 2019 Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-03 apparent, or potential conflicts of interest that may develop subsequent to the date of execution of this Agreement and shall give such notice pursuant to Section 6 herein, within ten (1 0) days of Consultant's knowledge of such conflict. District reserves the right to require Consultant to submit a financial disclosure statement. c. Consultant agrees to refrain from other engagements that may present an actual, apparent or potential conflict of interest with respect to the work covered by this Agreement. Consultant may request a waiver of these requirements from District. The request for a waiver must be in writing and shall contain a disclosure and description of the actual, apparent or potential conflict of interest and Consultant's reasons and justification for requesting such a waiver. The request shall be submitted to District pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement.

10. Ownership of Work Product. Ail technical data, evaluations, plans, specifications, maps, drawings, images, reports or other work product of Consultant prepared pursuant to this Agreement constitute work made for hire ("Work Product"). a. Ail Work Product shall be delivered to Client upon completion of the services authorized hereunder, and shall become, the property of Client, and Client shall be the copyright holder thereof. Client shall have the right to make and retain copies and use ail Work Product; provided, however, the use shall be limited to the intended use for which the services and Work Products are provided under this Agreement. Client agrees to Indemnify and hold Consultant harmless if Work Product is used for other than its original intended purpose. b. Consultant retains no rights to use the Work Product and agrees not to challenge the validity of Client's rights or ownership in the Work Product. Consultant may retain copies of the Work Product for its files and internal use. Consultant's publication or release of any or all of the information directly derived from work performed or data obtained in connection with services rendered under this Agreement must first be approved In writing by Client. c. If Consultant has any rights to the Client Work Product that cannot be assigned to Client, (a) Consultant unconditionally and irrevocably waives the enforcement of such rights, including all claims and causes of action of any kind against Client with respect to such rights, and agrees, at Client's request and expense, to consent to and join in any action to enforce such rights, and {b) Consultant unconditionally and irrevocably grants to Client during the term of such rights, an exclusive, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide, fully paid and royalty-free license, with rights to sublicense through multiple levels of sublicensees, to reproduce, create derivative works of, distribute, publicly perform, and publicly display by all means now known or later developed, such rights.

11. Indemnification. Consultant, by execution of this Agreement, specifically agrees to hold harmless, defend and indemnify District, Its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and ail actions, claims, loss, liability, damage and expense arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligent, reckless, or willful misconduct of Consultant, Consultant's employees or subconsultants engaged by Consultant in connection with the work of Consultant pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, excepting only such injury and harm as may be caused solely and exclusively by Client's sole negligence, willful misconduct or active negligence. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to Consultant exceed Consultant's professional's proportionate percentage offault Such indemnity shall extend to claims, demands, or liabilities, of every kind or nature whatsoever including, but not limited to, personal injury, wrongful death, and property damage occurring during and/or after completion of the Work. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, if

4 of 12 PAR Environmental Services, Inc. November 21, 2019 Professfonal Services Agreement 2019.PSA·03 Consultant Is a design professional, as defined by Section 2782.8(b)(2) of The Civil Code of the State of California, or its successor, then such design professional shall, to the fullest extent permitled by law, indemnify, and hold Client harmless from and against any and all liabilities, losses or damages, arising out of or encountered in connection with this Agreement or the prosecution of work under it to the extent such, liabilities, losses or damages, are actually caused by the negligence of such design professional or its agents, employees, or subcontractors, or their agents or employees. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Client, its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers.

12. Insurance. During the performance of the Services under this Agreement, Consultant and each subconsultanl retained by Consultant shall maintain at their own expense the following insurance:

(1) General Liability Insurance, with a combined single limit of $1,000,000 for each occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate.

(2) Automobile Liability Insurance, with a combined single limit of $1 ,000,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident.

(3) Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with Section 3700 of the California Labor Code and Employers' Liability Insurance Act, with a limit of $1,000,000 for each occurrence. Consultant shall provide a certificate of compliance in the form attached as Exhibit C.

{4) Errors and Omissions or other applicable Professional Liability coverage in the minimum amount of $1,000,000.

Said insurance will be evidenced by certification filed with the Client as otherwise specified by this Agreement. All policies shall name "the Oakdale Irrigation District, the South San Joaquin Irrigation District, the Tri-Dam Project, and each of their respective directors, officers, employees and volunteers" as additional insureds on the General Commercial Liability and Automobile Liability policies.

a. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability Insurance: Consultant shall provide and maintain commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance as set forth in this Agreement.

1. Coverage: Coverage for commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as the following:

i. Insurance Services Office ("ISO") Commercial General Liability Coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001 ); and

ii. ISO Business Auto Coverage (Form CA 0001), covering Symbol 1 (any auto).

2. Limits: Consultant shall maintain limits no less than the following limits:

i. General liability of One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate, for bodily injury, personal

5 of 12 PAR Environmental Services, Ina, November 21, 2019 Professional SeiVices Agreement 2019-PSA-03 injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability insurance or other form With a general aggregate limit or products·completed operations aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the projec!/location (with the ISO CG 2503, or ISO CG 2504, or insurer's equivalent endorsement provided to Client) or the general aggregate limit and products·completed operations aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; and

ii. Automobile Liability of One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) for bodily injury and property damage each accident limit.

3. Required l>rovisions: The General Liability and Automobile Liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

i. "The South San Joaquin Irrigation District, and each of their respective directors, officers, employees, and authorized volunteers are to be given insured status (ISO endorsement CG 2010, CG 2033, or insurer's equivalent for general liability coverage) as respect to liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; and automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant." The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to Client, its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers;

ii. For any claims related to the Services, Consultant's insurance shall be the primary insurance, and any insurance, self·insurance, or other coverage maintained by Client, shall be non·contributory.

iii. Any failure by Consultant to comply with reporting or other provisions of the insurance policies including but not limited to a breach of any warranties contained therein shall not affect coverage provided to Client, its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers; and

iv. Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each Insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

4. Subrogation: Consultant shall waive all rights of subrogation against Client.

b. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance: Consultant and all sub· contractors shall insure (or be a qualified self-insured) under the applicable laws relating to Worker's Compensation Insurance, all of their employees working on or about the construction site, in accordance with the "Workers' Compensation and Insurance Act." Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any Acts amendatory thereof. Consultant shall provide employer's liability insurance with limits of no less than One Million Dollars ($1;000,000) each accident, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) disease policy limit, and One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) disease each employee.

If Consultant is a Sole Proprietor, a Sole Proprietor Business Affidavit Form must be on file with the Client prior to the start of the Work or providing Services.

6 of 12 PAR ~nvlronmental Services, Inc. November 21, 2019 Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-()3

c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions: Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by Client.

d. Acceptability of Insurers: Consultant shall purchase the policies of insurance required under this Agreement from insurers having a current A.M. Best Financial Strength Rating of no less than A, and Financial Size Category of no less than VII or as otheJWise approved by Client.

e. Evidence of Insurance: Evidence of the insurance coverage required to be maintained by Consultant under this Agreement, as represented by Certificates of Insurance and all required endorsements issued by the Insurance carrier, must be furnished to Client prior to Consultant starting the Work. Such Certificates of Insurance/endorsement shall state that Client will be notified in writing thirty (30) days prior to cancellation of insurance. Timely renewal certificates will be provided to Client.

f. Continuation of Coverage: If any of the required coverages expire during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall deliver all applicable renewal certificates to Client at least ten (1 0) days prior to the expiration date.

13. Confidentiality. Consultant shall not, either during or after the term of this Agreement, disclose to any third party, any confidential information relative to the work of Client without the prior written consent of Client.

14. Non-Discrimination ln Employment. Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment or volunteer because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, or physical, mental handicap or any other basis prohibited by applicable law. a. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment wtthout regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or any other basis prohibited by applicable law. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, promotion, demotion or transfer; recruitment or advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; or selection for training, including apprenticeship. Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices that Consultant shall provide an atmosphere free of harassment as prohibtted by applicable law for employees, clients, and volunteers.

b. Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sex, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap or any other basis prohibited by applicable law.

15. Financial Records. Consultant shall retain all financial records, including, but not limited to, documents, reports, books and accounting records which pertain to any work or transaction performed pursuant to this Agreement for four (4) years after the expiration of this Agreement. Either District or any duly authorized representative of Client shall, with reasonable notice, have access to and the right to examine, audit and copy such records.

7 of 12 PAR Environmental Services~ Inc. November21, 2019 Professional Services Agreement 2019"PSA"03 16. Compliance With Laws; Labor Code Provisions. It is the responsibility of the Consultant and any subconsultant to comply with all federal, state and local laws and regulations applicable to Consultant and any subconsultant, including provisions of DIVISION 2, PART 7 of the California Labor Code, and those provisions governing the payment of prevailing wages, working hours, overtime, the employment of apprentices and record keeping requirements. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are available at District's principal office and will be made available to any interested party on request. The following sections of the California Labor Code are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement and will be made available by District upon request: Section 1771 (prevailing wage requirement,) Section 1810 (eight hour workday,) Section 1813 (penalty for failure to pay overtime,) Section 1777.5 (apprenticeship requirements); Section 1776 (recordkeeping requirements) and Section 1771.4 (job site posting).

17. Assignment. Consultant may not assign its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of Client, which may be granted or withheld in Client's sole discretion.

18. Amendments. Modification or amendments to the terms of this Agreement shall be approved by Client's Board of Directors, and consented to in writing by Client as an amendment to this Agreement, and executed by all parties.

19. Termination. Either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by serving upon the other party thirty (30) days' advance written notice of termination. The notice shall be deemed served and effective for all purposes on the date it is deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed to Consultant at the address indicated in Section 6. In the event of such notice of termination: a. Consultant shall, as directed by Client or on such other mutually acceptable terms, proceed with the orderly shutdown of project activities, cease rendering further services and proceed with archiving of project materials. b. Consultant shall deliver to Client copies of all writings and other Work Product prepared pursuant to this Agreement. The term "writings" shall be construed to mean and include handwriting, typewriting, computer files and records, drawings, blueprints, printing, photostating, photographing, and every other rneans of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or syrnbols, or combinations thereof. c. Client shall have full ownership and control of all such writings delivered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. d. Client shall pay Consultant for work performed until the effective date of terrnination, subject to the limitations prescribed by Sections 4 and 5 of this Agreement.

20. No Rule of Strict Construction. The parties agree that this Agreement and any amendments or exhibits hereto shall be construed without regard to any presumption or rule requiring construction against the party causing such instrument or any portion thereof to be drafted, or in favor of the party receiving a particular benefit under the Agreement. No rule of strict construction shall be applied against any party. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court to be unenforceable, the parties shall deem the provision to be modified to the extent necessary to allow it to be enforced to the extent permitted by law, or if it cannot be modified, the provision will be severed and deleted from this Agreement, and the remainder of the Agreement will continue in effect.

21. Applicable Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by, construed, and enforced In accordance with, the laws of the State of California. Any claims or litigation arising

8 of 12 PAR Environmental Services, Inc. November 21, 2019 Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-03 under this Agreement shall be brought by the parties in the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin.

22. Survival. The ownership of work product provisions of Section 10, the indemnity provisions of Section 11, the confidentiality provisions of Section 13 and the inspection provisions of Section 15 shall survive the expiration or other termination of this Agreement.

23. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with the exhibits hereto, is the final, complete, and exclusive agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and merges all prior discussions between the parties. No modification of or amendment to this Agreement, nor any waiver of any rights under this Agreement, will be effective unless in writing and signed by Client and Consultant.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement as of the dates indicated below; provided, however, that the Agreement shall be deemed effective as of the Effective Date identified above.

CLIENT CONSULTANT

TRI-DAM PROJECT PAR Environmental Services, Inc.

Jeffrey K. Shields Date Mary L. Manier! Date Interim General Manager President

9 of 12 PAR Environmental Services, Inc. November 21, 2019 Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-03

EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK

10 of 12 SCOPE OF WORK

PAR Environmental Services, Inc. (PAR) Is pleased to submit this proposal to complete Phase 11 archaeological studies and effect determinations for three archaeological sites within the Stanislaus National l'orest, Tuolumne County, CA. The sites are summarized In Table 1. PAR understands that the work will be conducted for Tri-Dam Project and will be reviewed by the Stanislaus National Forest (SNF). PAR maintains an extensive In-house llbrary relevant to Stanislaus National Forest resources and the Sugar Pine Railroad and will draw on our sources and previous archaeological data as much as possible for the evaluations.

Table 1. Archaeological sites Proposed for Additional Worl( and Effects Assessments Trinomial Other Description Required Work Effort (CA·) Designation TU0-3750H FS-OS-16-51· Bumblebee Camp 1 Update record, reassess subsurface 0675 deposits under Criterion D, assess affects of 2017 road construction TU0-1456H FS 05-16-51· Segment 432J of Sugar Pine Update reGord, assess affects of 2017 02.81 Railroad road construction TU0-1766H FS 05-16-51· Bumblebee Camp 1 Debris Rerecord site, test refuse deposits for 0288 Scatter subsurface integrity, evaluate under all NRHP criteria, assess affects of2017 road construction

TASK 1: MANAGEMENT

This tas!< Includes hours for administration, billing, and coordination with the client and the SNF­ It also includes preparation of a brief research design, necessary for the ARPA permit application. PAR will apply for an ARPA permit from the United States Forest Service (USFS) to conduct the work. We assume thatthere is no need for a Native American monitor, given the historical nature of the sites, but have experience working with local tribes and monitors, should the SNF require monitors.

TASK 2: ARCHIVAL RESEARCH

PAR will draw on existing in·house data and provided Information (such as the Sugar Pine Railroad context) as much as possible during the evaluation. However, we have anticipated a total of one day of research at the USFS Supervisor's and Dlstrlct offices (focused on Sugar Pine Railroad).

TASK 3: FIELDWORK

In 2017 construction of an access road occurred that may have adversely affected three sites along the route. Tri·Dam has been asked by SNF to conduct additional worl< to fully document the sites, l

October 23, 2019 document the new construction completed to date, use this Information to reevaluate the sites In light of the road construction effects, and determine if the 2017 construction adversely affected the character· defining traits at the site. The three sites represent the logging railroad segment and a related work camp, We understand that ascertaining the continuity between sites and their relationship Is an Important part of the work.

Fieldwork will focus on comparing the previous site records and sketch maps against the current conditions at each site to assess if any adverse effects occurred as a result of the construction effort. We will update the existing information, remap the sites, If necessary, and use a combination of metal detection, scaled drawings of selected features, map revisions, limited Shovel Test Units, and on-site cataloging to document the current conc:fltlons. PAR does not anticipate collecting any artifacts, and curatlon fees are not Included In this scope. Artifacts will be cataloged on site and left in situ. We anticipate the following field effort at each site.

CA·TU0·3550H (FS 05-16·53·0675)

CA·TU0·3750H Is characterized as a Sugar Pine Railroad logging work camp containing numerous structural features and associated refuse. The site was occupied Intermittently from 1900 to 1940 and at one time housed 145 men in tents and cabins, with a cookhouse, shop, operational equipment, and other features, The site, as pocumented in2017 by Risse, contains three loci with structural remains, privy pit, cabin foundations, a corral, and debris. Named Bumblebee Camp #1, the site has been determined eligible for listing in the National Register under criteria A and D. Character-defining traits included visible features and clearly defined activity areas (Joel); distinct association with the railroad grade; heavily wooded and remote setting; refuse that can address questions regarding changing llfeways, ethnic make· up, camp layout and design, technologies, and economic status (Risse 2017).

In order to assess the current condition of the site PAR proposes the following: • Compare the existing site Information prepared by Risse 2017 and the SNF In the 1990s to the current site; • Use a sub-meter Trimble to map any portion of the site that has been altered since 201"1; • Metal detect features and Joel to Identify scattered material as a result of road construction or subsurface potential; • Prepare scaled sketch rnaps of any features that appear changed since the earlier recording efforts; • Test the refuse deposits by using up to five 2-foot-square test units to assess if the site still contains adequate information to address the research domains listed In 2017; • Catalog artifacts from the units and checlc loci debris against the previous site records; • Assess changes to the setting, feeling, and association with the other sites and the railroad segment • Update the existing record on DPR 523 forms, as appropriate. 2 lfb.l\RVICESJNC...... October 23, 2019 CA-TU0-1456/H {FS 05-15-53-0281)

Segment 453-J of the Sugar Pine Railroad site was recorded and evaluated by theSNF in the 1990s. The railroad has been found eligible for Inclusion In the NRHP. Proposed work at this site includes:

• Compare the existing site Information prepared by the SNF In the 1990s to the current site; • Use a sub-meter Trimble to map any portion of the site that has been altered since 2017; • Metal detect the segment to identify scattered material as a result of road construction; • Prepare scaled sketch maps of any features (trestles, fill) that appear changed since the earlier recording efforts; • Assess changes to the setting, feeling, and association with the other; • Update the existing record on DPR 523 forms, as appropriate.

CA·TU0·1761SH (FS 05 ..1.6·53·0288)

Site TU0-1766H was recorded by the SNF In 1980 and contained three rectangular depressions {one filled with refuse), skid trails, haul roads, and a structure. The features were aligned on both sides of a dirt road and appear associated with Bumblebee Camp #1 and the Sugar Pine Railroad. The site has not been rerecorded since 1980 and has not been evaluated under NRHP criteria. We proposed the following work effort at this site.

• Compare the existing site information prepared by SNF In 1980 to the current site; • Resurvey the site to Identify past features and ascertain the presence of additional features; • Remap the site using a sub-meter Trimble to current Industry standards; • Metal detect features to Identify scattered material as a result of road construction or subsurface potential; • Prepare scaled sketch plans any features with structural elements or character-defining traits; • Obtain current photographs offeatures and overviews ofthe site; • Catalog and record representative samples of artifacts by function; paying particular attention to maker's marks or diagnostic technological characteristics to assist In dating the deposit; • Test refuse deposits by using up to six 2-foot-square test units to assess presence or absence of subsurface material; • Use a fiberglass probe In depressions to assess potential depth and, If uncertain, use an auger to ascertain function;

3

October 23, 2019 • Assess changes to the setting, feeling, and association with Bumblebee Camp 1 and the railroad segment. • Record the site on DPR 523 forms, as appropriate.

TASK 4. REPORT PREPARATION

PAR will prepare an evaluation report to Section 106 standards documenting the fieldwork and assessing or reassessing the eligibility of the sites In light of National Register criteria (particularly A, C, and D) and the USFS Region 5 Programmatic Agreement. DPR 523 forms w!ll be updated or prepared, based on new data and will be attached as an appendiX. PAR will submit the draft report, Including appended DPR forms and other relevant data, to Tri·Dam for review. PAR will address any comments on the draft and will produce .a revised report for submittal to the SNF. PAR will then address the SNF comments and produce a final evaluation report PAR anticipates producing five copies of the final report for distribution to the SNF, SHPO, and Central California Information Center.

once the recommendations of the evaluation report are accepted by the SNF, PAR will prepare a Finding of Effect, based on the road being left in place. The analysis will follow criteria for effect outlined In Section 106 and will use the field data to analysts changes to Integrity and alterations of charac-ter· defining elements of the site. If the effects appear adverse, the document will provide appropriate treatment options. If a Finding of Adverse Effect Is recommended, PAR will prepare a Memorandum of Agreement that stipulates treatment measures required to resolve the effects. We understand that the MOA requires negotiation with the SNF and the. SHPO and agreement to the conditions by Tri-Dam Projects.

PAR will prepare a draft letter for SHPO consultation, requesting concurrence on the reassessment of eligibility, Finding of Effect, and the MOA. We understand that the SNF, as lead federal agency, Is responsible for consultation with SHPO and will be ultimately responsible for submitting the package to the SHPO.

COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS

PAR Environmental Services, Inc. (PAR) is a small, Public Utilities Commission-certified, woman­ owned California $-Corporation headquartered In Sacramento, California. PAR has been In business since 1982 and Is a financially sound, California $-corporation. PAR's founders, James G. and Mary L. Maniery, are often "hands-on" principals, acting as project managers, field directors and report writers, as well as Company owners. PAR maintains a permanentstaffof9, including planners and cultural resource specialists. The PAR cultural team Is well rounded, with specialists In prehistory, ethnography, geoarchaeology, history, architectural history, and historical archaeology, many of whom have been with PAR for over five years. This

4

October 23, 2019 staff continuity and experience allows PAR to take a cohesive team approach to projects and guarantees clients available and experienced personnel in case of emergency situations.

Since 1984 the firm has completed over 250 projects for utility companies Including PG&E, Tri­ Dam, El Dorado Irrigation District, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), Lassen Municipal Utility District (LMUD), Nevada Irrigation District, Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), EscondidoNista Irrigation District, Western Power Administration, and California Energy Commission. PAR has tested both prehistoric and historical sites for NRHP significance, recorded and evaluated existing hydroelectric and logging-related features (substations, dams, canals, powerhouses, and transmission lines, etc.) and associated residential and construction camps, prepared HABS/HAER documentation, monitored PG&E and SMUD construction activities, and prepared Findings of Effect and Memorandum of Agreements and other management documents for Section 106 and FERC compliance.

PARs principals began their careers with the US Forest Service and the company has over 35 years of experience working within the Forest Service framework. We have completed numerous projects for PG&E at Pinecrest and at various locations related to the Spring Gap-Stanislaus Project; all have been subjected to SNF review. We have also worked far Caltrans, private developers, CaiFire, and the SNF in Tuolumne County and are very familiar with the logging railroads, logging camps, and work the SNF has been doing on the Sugar Pine and other railroads within their forest. We are adept at working with the SNF Programmatic Agreement conditions and are familiar with the SNF requirements for GIS products.

In the lastten years PAR has worked extensively with various energy companies towards renewal of numerous FERC licenses as well as FERC boundary adjustments, as well as with the Forest Service. Work has Included Initial Inventory and evaluation of systems and archaeological resources, preparation of Finding of Effects, MOAs and Pas, Historic Property Treatment Plans (HPTP) and Management Plans (HPMP), and Implementation of these plans. PAR has experience in Calaveras and Tuolumne counties, including studies on PG&E's Mokelumne River and Stanislaus River projects, and work for EBMUD at Pardee and Camanche reservoirs. These projects included Inventory and evaluation of both built environment and archaeological resources, and compliance with FERC and the forest service. Work on these systems was conducted with review by FERC, SNF, the Office of Historic Preservation and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and various federal agencies (US Forest Services, Bureau of Land Management, US Army Corps and Engineers).

PAR STAFF

Our in-house Cultural Resources Department has successfully completed complex projects Involving National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) properties requiring full compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act, NEPA, and CEOA regulations since 1982 (over 700 studies completed to date). Staff capabilities include geoarchaeology, prehistoric and historical archaeology, obsidian studies, historical 5

October 23, 2019 PAR Environmental Services, Ina. November 2i, 2019 Profess lena! Services Agreement 20i9·PSA-Q3

EXHIBIT "B" RATE AND FEE SCHEDULE

11 of 12 Arcl!aeclcglcal Work for Hells Halt Aare A001!911Road Prq:~~~red fQr Tri·Dam Prcjed 10/23/2019 £13D-19·3Zl I ] TasM>Ersonnel FunctiM Rate'hr. Hours Total

flroi oot M anaiJIIIIllll'lfiCoordinatlon!ARPA Permit M. L.. Manlery Principal $165.00 4 $660 J.G.Mmiery Principal $160.00 4 $640 AEMmlfliY 9'. Arohl!lldogit;l $90.00 16 $1,440 Tdal $2,740 Forest Servle& Re!tiarc:h AEMmlery 9'. Archll!lC/ogist $90.00 10 $900 Tdal $900 Flllldwork M. L.. M811«Y Principal $165.00 40 $6,600 AEMmlery 9'. Arci!S!iOioglst $90.00 40 $3,000 GTeylor AsroaleteAI'Ch. $70.00 40 $2,800 A.~kln G/S'Graphlo Artitt $90.00 2 $180 Total $13,180 Phasell EvaluatiQI Rqxlrt M.l.. Manlery Principal $165.00 16 $2,640 AE MllllEily 9'. Archll!lC/agist $90.00 !,Ill $7,200 G. Ter;lor AsroaleteArch. $70.00 48 $3,3130 A.Rmkin GJ&'Grep/1/cArtitt $90.00 24 $2,160 J.O'Connor Ad!rin Asi!J~ii $65.00 . 8 $520 Total $16,880 Finding of Effect Pr~ration M.l.. Mmlery Prinolpa/ $165.00 8 $1,320 AEMm!ery S". Arahaeolagllt $90.00 28 $2,520 A.Rm!dn GI'6(Jhlo Artist $1:10.00 2 $180 Total $2,700 M OAtSZ.IPO TranSI'llitlal Pr~ratlon M. L.. Ma1lery Principal $165.00 4 $680 AEManlery s-. Archarologlst $90.00 20 $1,800 Total $1,800

TOTAL.L.ABOR $37,200 &xpenses Mila:ge :P0 .58 750 $435 Hota (assumed Pll'lll1I'E!SI: Lcke Resort) $190,00 4 $760 PerDI.

~.z: ,-e: ~ 23-0I;t-19 ilfL. Mmiery Ollie President PAR Envirol'!ll1I!I'\!S Sar\IICES, 1m. PAR Environmental Services, Inc. November 21, 2019 Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-03 EXHIBIT "C" WORKERS COMPENSATION CERTIFICATION

Labor Code Section 3700 provides, in pertinent part: "Every employer except the state shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways: (a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this state; or (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self-insure either and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees ..."

I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-Insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract.

"CONSULTANr

By: ______Dated: ______

Name: ______

Title: ______

12 of 12 BEARDSLEY

ABAY REPAIRS Beardsley After-Bay Repair Funding Options

1 A. A-Bay Costs Paid from Operating Cash Flow- Projected 12/31/19 Balances L 3 Balance 4 Total Cash & Investments 29,412,966 5 Operating Reserve (3,237,795) 6 Maintenance Reserve (9,481,343) 7 Cash in Bani< (2,000,000) 8 ProjectedJan 2020 Total Distribution 14,693,828 9 Projected Jan 2020 Distribution per District 7,346,914 10 11 12 B. A-Bay Costs Paid from Maintenance Fund- Projected 12/31/19 Balances "" 14 Balance Change 15 Total Cash & Investments 29,412,966 16 Operating Reserve (3,237,795) 17 Maintenance Reserve (7 ,896, 107) 1,585,236 18 Cash in Bani< (2,000,000) 19 Projected Jan 2020 Tqtal Distribution 16,279,064 1,585,236 20 Projected Jan 2020 Distribution per District 8,139,532 792,618 21 22 23 c. Financial Impact to Tri-Dam L'-t 25 Current Yield- Maintenance Fund MMF 1.43% 26 Proposed Maintenance Withdrawal 1,585,236 27 Annual Interest Income Opportunity Cost 22,669 28 29 30 D. Anticipated/ Budgeted A-Bay Costs "" 32 Phase I- 2019 Remaining Contract Paid YTD Balance 33 Contractor 1,435,000 1,435,000 34 Construction Management* 217,371 67,135 150,236 35 1,652,371 67,135 1,585,236 ;)0 37 * Does not include pre-construction activities I support 38 39 Phase II- 2020 Low High Average 40 Construction Estimate 1,122,201 2,208,443 1,665,322 41 Construction Management 189,321 246,048 217,685 42 1,311,522 2,454,491 1,883,007 BEARDSLEY AFTERBAY

SHEET PILE GROUT WORK PLAN BOARD AGENDA REPORT

Date: November 21, 2019 Staff: Forrest Killingsworth (SSJID) Abay Project Manager

SUBJECT: Beardsley Afterbay Dam- Sheet Pile Grout Work Plan

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Staff to procure all materials, equipment, and training necessary to proceed with the Sheet Pile Grout Work Plan as described in Attachment A, at a cost not to exceed $30,000.

BACKGROUND AND/OR HISTORY:

Phase 1 of the Beardsley Afterbay Maintenance project, involving the installation of sheet piles along the end walls and cutoff walls of each abutment, has been substantially completed as of November 1st Following installation of the sheet piles, the voids between the webbing of the sheet pile and the end walls were intentionally left empty. To prevent seepage between the end wall and the sheet pile, the low flute of the sheet pile needs to remain in constant contact with the original redwood panels of the end wall. Although sound in theory, staff from Condor, SSJID, OlD, & TOP ("Project Management Team") recognized (upon installation of the sheet piles) that some gaps would be inevitable and could allow a small amount of water to pass.

Based on our observations during construction, it became apparent that deterioration of the redwood panels (in any location) was accelerated where sediment enriched water flowed across saturated lumber. Recognizing this issue, and as a matter of prevention, the Project Management Team contacted a grout specialist from Alchemy Spectec to evaluate the condition and provide a recommendation to seal the contact point between the end wall and the sheet pile. The specialist recommended backfilling the web voids with 1.5" drain rock along with injection tubes located at the corner of each web. After backfilling, an expandable polyurethane grout could be injected into the drain rock (via injection tubes) resulting in an improved seal. The proposed polyurethane grout was reviewed by Condor's environmental consultant (Monk and Associates) and was found to be acceptable for use around water ways, including areas in contact with potable water.

With the recommendation in hand, the Condor team developed a work plan and submitted the proposal to DSOD for approval. As of the dale of this report, the project team has responded to minor comments from DSOD and is awaiting formal approval. The voids have also been backfilled with drain rock along with injection tubes fabricated by TOP staff.

ANALYSIS The Project Management Team has been deeply involved in the development and design of the work plan as presented in Attachment A. Based upon visual inspection during construction and observation of the internal components of the crib dam, it appears that preventing sediment enriched water from flowing against saturated lumber is a valuable preventative measure that will extend the useful life of the structure. The grout material proposed is environmentally friendly and can be installed by District/TOP crews with minima/training from the grout specialist.

FISCAL IMPACT Material costs for the polyurethane grout have been quoted at $21,017.80, as provided in Attachment B. Onsite training from the Alchemy Spectec grout specialist, including pump rental for grout injection, is expected to cost approximately $3,000 (based on verbal communication with the grout specialist), however a formal proposal was not received as of the writing of this report. Therefore, the total equipment, material, and training costs are estimated to be $24,017.80. Staff recommends that the Board authorize expenditures up to $30,000 towards this effort, allowing for adjustments in total material required and/or training necessary to accomplish the project ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A- Work Plan for the Beardsley Afterbay Dam Sheet Pile Void Grouting Attachment B - Grout Material Quote

Board Motion: Motion by:------Second by:------

VOTE: Kamper (Yes/No) Holbrook (Yes/No) Holmes (Yes/No) Roos (Yes/No) Weststeyn (Yes/No)

Orvis (Yes/No) Altieri (Yes/No) DeBoer (Yes/No) Doornenbal (Yes/No) Santos (Yes/No)

Action(s) to be taken: ATTACHMENT A

WORK PLAN BEARDSLEY AFTERBAY DAM SHEET PILE VOID GROUTING

Prepared for Tri-Dam Project 31885 Old Strawberry Road PO Box 1158 Pinecrest, CA 95364

Prepared by Condor Earth 21663 Brian Lane Sonora, CA 95370 209.532.0361

Revision 1, November 8, 2019 Condor Project No. 7262

Copyright© 2019, Condor Earth All Rights Reserved

CONDOR" TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 2.0 SHEET PILE VOID GROUTING ...... 1 3.0 REPORTING ...... 1

APPENDICES FIGURES Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Sheetpile Void Grouting Locations ATTACHMENTS Grouting Procedure Recommendations, Alchemy/Spetec, October 24, 2019 Grouting Clarification (email), Alchemy/Spetec, November 7, 2019 Materials Data Sheets

11 CONDOR~ WORK PLAN BEARDSLEY AFTERBAY DAM SHEET PILE VOID GROUTING

1.0 INTRODUCTION This Work Plan, Revision 1, is intended to supplement the Maintenance Project Drawings for Beardsley A:fterbay Dam No. 62-7 and describes the methods and procedures for certain maintenance activities during rehabilitation of the Tri-Dam Project's Beardsley Afterbay Dam in Strawberry, Tuolumne County, California. The purpose of this Project is to reduce seepage through the Afterbay Dam (Afterbay). The site is located downstream of the Beardsley Reservoir, as shown on Figure 1.

Maintenance activities covered by the Work Plan includes grouting of voids between the recently-installed sheet piles and the pre-existing wooded end-wall along both dam abutments.

2.0 SHEET PILE VOID GROUTING Following installation of sheet piles on both right (north) and left (south) abutments, remaining voids between the sheet pile flanges and the pre-existing redwood plank dam end walls were backfilled with clean 1.5-inch drain rock. Owing to the potential for water seepage between the sheet pile and wood plank contact points, Condor together with TDP representatives have developed this plan to inject polyurethane grout for increased seepage protection at 6 void locations, as shown on Figure 2.

Refer to the attached recommendations and materials as provided by the grout manufacturer's grouting expert. This Work Plan specifies herewith to use the F400 grout material alternate, as recommended by ALCHEMY/Spectec. Note that the manufacturer's grouting expert has recommended a low grout injection pressure to start, with a refusal pressure of 500 psi for this project (see attached email). As indicated on the attached grout material specification sheet, the cured polyurethane grout is harmless to the environment and rated for use around potable water. Twelve grout probes consisting of 0.5-inch steel pipe were installed prior to drain rock backfilling, as per the attached recommendations. Refer to Figure 2 for the grout pipe injection sequence.

TDP intends to conduct the grouting work under the direction and in the presence of the manufacturer' s representative, as soon as agency approvals, schedules and materials procurement permits.

3.0 REPORTING The grouting operation will be documented and included in the Phase 1 post-construction report.

Scott W. Lewis, CEG No. 1835 Principal Engineering Geologist

X:\Projcct\7000_p rj\7262 Tri-Dam\7262 Beardsley\Reports\FR 20191108 Beardsley Sheetpile Grout Work Plan Rev l .docx ~ CONDOR FIGURES

CONDOR~ ~ NORTH

0 2000 SCALE IN FEET

Beardsley lake

BACKGROUND IMAGE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, STRAWBERRY, 2012 VICINITY MAP BEARDSLEY AFTERBAY DAM FIGURE SEEPAGE REPAIR 1 TRI-DAM PROJECT

PINECREST, CALIFORNIA 7262_F1

ATTACHMENT

~ CONDOR ALCHEMY petec

October 24, 2019

Subject: Tri-Dam Beardsley Afterbay

On 23oct2019 I had the opportunity to inspect the sheet pile to wood interface at Tri-Dam Project Beardsley Afterbay. It was expressed to me that the cavities/void areas in the sheet piles were to be filled to minimize the passage of water and thus prolong the service life of the repair. While cement was considered the amount of thermal expansion/movement expected required something more flexible.

Below is a suggested procedure for grout the voids with polyurethane grout. There are three different grouts that can be employed for this repair. All grouts being considered are closed celled, hydrophobic, ineti, contain no VOC's, and are NSF 61 rated for potable water use.

Hl 00 has the good expansion at xl8 but has only minor movement capabilities. F400 has only about x6 expansion but has 100% elongation. The final option is to mix the F400 and HlOO in equal parts. This mixed grout will allow for roughly 30%-40% elongation while having about a x9 expansion factor.

The grouts in question are all similarly priced so higher expansion can be a cost saver. The small scope ofthis application means that the cost difference between the H IOO's xiS and the F400's x6 is minimal. I therefore suggest using either the F400 or the F400 and HlOO combination grout. If there have been calculations done on the expect amount of movement, we can then pick the appropriate grout based off those calculations. If not selecting F400 with the highest elongation is the safest route to go and my recommendation.

1. Install two perforated grout probes per cavity at the intersections of the sheet pile and wood in all cavities to be grouted. One probe will be upstream and one will be downstream. 2. Fill all cavities with drain rock. Any size rock is acceptable in regards to being able to grout it. 3. Shortly before commencing grouting wet the drain rock, sheet piles and wood. 4. Start injection on the downstream probe. 5. The foam will expand up and out of the cavity, this is to be expected. 6. Try pumping downstream port again. It will most likely not take grout. 7. Repeat step 6 until you reach refusal and the probe no longer accepts grout. 8. Try pumping the upstream probe. It may already be at refusal. 9. Repeat step 8 until you reach refusal and the probe no longer accepts grout. 10. Move to next upstream cavity and repeat steps 3 through 10. 11. Excess foam shall be trimmed off.

4508 Bibb Blvd., Suite B5 Tucker, GA 30084 USA Office: 404-618-0438 ALCHEMY etec

Below are the recommendations on the construction of the grout probes.

...... End Caps

Start drilling holes just above end cap. Holes spacing is 12" Stop drilling holes 24'' from top of • sheet piling. Drill Holes •

Front View Side View

4508 Bibb Blvd., Suite B5 Tucker, GA 30084 USA Office: 404-618-0438 From: Charlie Lerman To: Scott Lewis Cc: Jim Spiegel; Andy Kositsky; Susan Larson [email protected]; Kjm Tarantino Subject: Re: FW: Grouting Plan Date: Thursday, November 07, 2019 3:09:06 PM

Scott, 1. The installation procedure limits the injection pressure to 1500 psi, which is much higher t ha n the circulation pressure that we typically allow for drilling embankments. The installation procedure was developed for multiple conditions including high-pressure water leaks in concrete and steel walls, which are more adverse than the conditions at t his dam. Because drain rock rather than cracked concrete is being grouted, and because the water pressure in the drain rock is relatively low, DSOD recommends the Design Engi neer discuss the use of a lower injection pressure with the grout manufacturer, to preclude damaging the timber sidewalls. The init ial pressure will indeed be low as we are pumping into the drain rock. Once the initial pumping has competed we will pump unt il refusal, steps 6 & I . Here is where the pressu re will come into play. 500 psi is a good safe number. Whi le it sounds like a lot compared to soil grout ing the volume and pump used are rnucll smaller. Concrete crack injection ca ps out at 1,500 psi but we don't need to be anywhere near that pressure.

2. The order in which the pipes are grouted should be chosen to avoid t rapping water. (Please provide a sequence for this step) Per step 4 grouting will begin on t he downstream side and progress to t he upstream side.

Respectfully, Charlie Lerman Director of Technical Services- Leak Seal Division The Grout Geek Direct: 949-933-0881 HQ: 404-618-0438 https·//www .lin kedi n. comlin/charlje-lerma n-637b236/ www.alchemy-spetec.com

Confidentiality Notice: This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S. C. Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this message. This transmission, and any attachments, may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please contact us immediately by return e-mail or at 404-618-0438 and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. SEMI-RIGID POLYURETHANE INJECTION RESIN FOR WATERPROOFING. @

DESCRIPTION PREPARATION OF THE SUBSTRATE Drill at 45° angle into the crack or joint. Ideally the injection hole should intersect the joint or crack half way through the thickness of the wall or SPETEC PUR H1 00 is a water activated semi-flexible po lyurethane foam slab. injection resin. Blow t he dust out of the injection hole with a probe that reaches the ADVANTAGES . back of the hole. Fix a packer of the right diameter into the injection hole. • One component. • Different react ion times are possible by adjusting the percentage of PREPARATION OF THE PRODUCT GEN ACC or GEN ACC Special accelerator. Read the technical and safety data sheets prior to commencement • The closed-cell structure of cured polyurethane ensures permanent of the injection works. Vigorously shake the G EN ACC or GEN ACC sealing of cracks and j oints. Special accelerator before use and add the required quantity (2-10%) • Cured polyurethane exhibits high strength and into the Spetec PUR H1 00 resin. Mix the accelerator homogeneously good chemical resistance (contact our Technical into the resin and protect against moisture and rain to prevent Service for chemical resistance). premature reaction. Only mix the amount of material that can be used • Cured polyurethane is harmless for the environment the same day. and resistant to biological attack. • Certified by Truesdail Labs to NSF/ANSI 61 -5 PREPARATION OF THE EQUIPMENT (approved for contact with drinking water). NSF/ANSI 61 -5 Depending on the application, injection can be carried out using a hand pump, pneumatic pump or electric pump . Use separate pumps for injection of water and polyurethane resin. Check that the pump is working properly. Prior t o injection, the resin pump must be flushed with appropriate pump flush and be completely free of water to prevent • Water cut-off of large flow and high pressure water leaks. pump blockage. • Water cut-off of water leaks in foundations such as diaphragm walls, piling sheets and secant piles. • Stabilization and water cut-off of large cracks, voids and gravel layers. APPLICATION • Pre and post injections in mines, t unnels, pipe j acking, drill & blast • Start the injection at the first packer; for vertical joints or cracks this is and TBM applications. usually the lowest packer. • Injections in combination with cement-based grout. • Do not over pressurize while injecting; the correct injection pressure • Crack and gravel layer injections in concrete structures. is the pressure that allows to resin to flow into the crack or joint . Avoid • Soil stabilization and anchors in porous geology. injecting at pressures of more than 1500psi (1 OObar). • Water cut-off of sewer water leaks and sewer stabilization. • If unreacted resin comes out of the joint or crack, stop t he injection • Probe grouting for below grade pipes. and move on to the next p acker. • Manhole injections. • After the last injection of resin intao the packer, shoot a litt le bit of water into the packer in order to make sure that the last injected resin will react as well. APPLICATION • Only catalyze the resin you will use within the next few hours. • Do NOT leave resin catalyzed with accelerator in pumps overnight or Note: the following are a few typical application descriptions. In case of material will harden and permanently damage equipment. other jobsite parameters, please contact our technical department. • Always flush the pump out at the end of the day. Resin left in the pump overnight can damage the pump. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS For leaking joints, identify if the cold joint runs vertically or horizontally. REQUIRED TOOLS Injection holes have to be angle drilled into the joint. For leaking cracks, Drill and drill bits of appropriate diameter and length. Mechanical drill the injection holes in a zig-zag pattern around t he crack to make Packers of appropriate diameter and length. Injection pump; manual, sure that the injection hole intersects the crack . pneumatic or electric.

. ) CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE After the injection, clean the pump with Spetec Pu mp Cleaner. If the pump will not be used for several days, flush the Spetec Pump Cleaner . \ out of the pump with lightweight motor oil or hydraulic fluid and leave it there until the next usage. Never rinse the pump with water. After injection, remove the packers from the concret e and fill the holes with a fast setting cement or any other appropriate filler material.

ALCHEMYIIpetec COMPLIMENTARY PRODUCTS STORAGE AND SHELF LIFE . . . For certain application where a faster reaction time is needed a special fast catalyst can be used. Spetec Pump Cleaner, Mechanical Packers, Store between 50° - 85° F (1 29° C). Oakum, and Injection Needles. oo - SAFTEY PRECAUTIONS ADVICE/FOCAL POINTS Avoid injecting by temperatures below -4°F (-20°C). In extreme cold Avoid contact with eyes and skin, always use personal protective conditions it is recommended to warm the resin and catalyst. Since equipment in compliance with local regulations. Read the relevant Spetec PUR H100 is water-reactive, liquid water should be present. Safety Data Sheet before use. Safety Data Sheets are available on www. alchemy-spetec.com When in doubt contact Alchemy-Spetec Technical TECHNICAL DATA Service.

APPEARANCE Physical Properties- Uncured- (appearance brown liquid}

Spetec PUR H100

Viscosity at 77°F (ASTM 04878-98) ±160cps

Flash Point (ASTM 01310-86) >302"F

Density (ASTM 03505-96 [20001) 1.058 ± 0.005

Physical Properties - Cured

Spetec PUR H100

Compressive strength 942psi

Tensile strength 290psi

Flexural strength >10MPa

CONSUMPTION

Consumption has to be assessed on site and is influenced by the amount of water leaking, thickness of the concrete slab or wall, presence of voids in and around the concrete, etc.

REACTION TIMES Reaction Rate with GEN ACC Accelerator

% 40"F 60°F n·F

% Start End Start End Start End Expansion

10 13" 49" 10" 46" 10" 56" 18V

Reaction Rate with G EN ACC Special Accelerator

% 41"F 59°F 77"F

% Start End Start End Start End Expansion

10 18" 71" 14" 52" 12" 52" 18V

PACKAGING

Spetec PUR H100 is supplied in 5 Gallon Pails. GEN ACC and GEN ACC Special are supplied in 0.5 gall on bottles.

FOR INDUSTRIAL USE ONLY. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN. NOT FOR INTERNAL CONSUMPTION. READ MATERIAL SAFETY DATASHEET PRIOR TO EVERY USE.

© 2018 Alchemy-Spetec. All rights reseved Spetec PUR H100 • Rev. 053119 ALCHEMYISpetec www.alchemy-spetec.com - Tech Support: 404-618-0438 HYDROPHOBIC CLOSED CELL POLYURETHANE FOAM INJECTION RESIN. @

DESCRIPTION PREPARATION OF THE PRODUCT Read the technical and safety data sheets prior t o commencement of the injection works. Vigorously shake the GEN ACC or GEN ACC SPETEC PUR F400 is a solvent and phthalate free, water reactive, Special accelerator before use and add the required quantity (2-1 0%) hydrophobic, closed cell, low viscosity, shrink-free, flexible, one into the SPETEC PUR F400 resin. Mix the accelerator homogeneously component polyurethane injection resin designed to shut off water into the resin and protect against moisture and rain to prevent leaks. premature reaction. Only mix the amount of material that can be used the same day. ADVANTAGES PREPARATION OF THE EQUIPMENT • One component. Depending on the application, injection can be carried out using a • Different reaction times are possible by adjusting the percentage of hand pump, pneumatic pump or electric pump. Use separate pumps GEN ACC or GEN ACC Special accelerator. for injection of water and polyurethane resin. Check that the pump is • The closed-cell structure of cured polyurethane ensures permanent working properly. Prior to injection, the resin pump must be flushed flexible sealing of cracks and joints. with appropriate pump flush and be completely free of water to prevent • Cured polyurethane is flexible, shrink-free and exhib­ pump blockage its good chemical resistance (contact our Technical Service for chemical resistance). APPLICATION • Cured polyurethane is harmless for the environment • Start the injection at the first packer; for vertical joints or cracks this and resistant to b iological attacks. is usually the lowest packer. • Certified to NSF 61-S (Approved for contact with • Do not over pressurize while injecting; the correct injection pressu re drinking water). NSF/ANSI 61-5 is the pressure that allows to resin to flow into the crack or joint. Avoid injecting at pressures of more than 1500psi (100bar). • If unreacted resin comes out of the joint or crack, stop the injection FIELD OF APPLICATION and move on to the next packer. • After the last injection of resin into the packer, shoot a little bit of water into the packer in order to make sure that the last injected • Shut off water leaks in concrete, brickwork and sewers where move­ resin will react as well. ment and settlement may occur. • Only catalyze the resin you will use within the next few hours. • Water cut-off of water leaks in foundations such as diaphragm walls, • Do NOT leave resin catalyzed with GEN ACC or GEN ACC Special piling sheets and secant piles. in pumps overnight or material wi ll harden and permanently damage • Sealing water-carrying cracks and joints in tunnel segments. · equipment. • Curtain grouting behind tunnel, concrete, brickwork and sewer walls. • Always flush the pump out at the end of the day. Resin left in the • Injection of water cut-off membranes and liners in tunnels. pump overnight can damage the pump.

APPLICATION REQUIRED TOOLS Drill and drill bits of appropriate diameter and length. Mechanical Packers of appropriate diameter and length. Injection pump; manual, Note: the following are a few typical application descriptions. In case of pneumatic or electric. other jobsite parameters, please contact our technical department. CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS After the injection, clean the pump with AP Flush 121 . If the pump will For leaking joints, identify if the cold joint runs vertically or horizontally. not be used for several days, flush the AP Flush 121 out of the pump Injection holes have to be angle drilled into the joint. For leaking cracks, with lightweight motor oil or hydraulic fluid and leave it there until the drill the injection holes in a zig-zag pattern around the crack to make next usage. Never rinse the pump with water. After injection, remove sure that the injection hole intersects the crack. the packers from the concrete and fill the holes with a fast setting cement or any other appropriate filler material.

COMPLIMENTARY PRODUCTS For certain application where a faster reaction time is needed a special fa st catalyst can be used. Pump cleaner, Mechanical Packers, Oakum, PREPARATION OF THE SUBSTRATE and Injection Needles. SPETEC® I.T.S KIT or SPETEC® R-I.T.S SYSTEM must be ordered separately. See Technical Data Sheets. Drill at 45° angle into the crack or joint. Ideally the injection hole should intersect the joint or crack half way through the thickness of the wall or ADVICE I FOCAL POINTS slab. Blow the dust out of the injection hole with a probe that reaches Avoid injecting when temperatures are below -4°F (-20°C). In extreme the back of the hole. Fix a packer of the right diameter into the injection cold conditions it is recommended to warm the resin and catalyst. Since hole. SPETEC PUR F400 is hydro active, liquid water should be present. ALCHEMY i lp~ec TECHNICAL DATA

APPEARANCE Physical Properties - Uncured- (appearance white liquid )

SPETEC PUR F400

Viscosity at n•F (ASTM 04878-98) ±340cps

Flash Point (ASTM 01310-86) >302°F

Density (ASTM 03505-96 [2000]) 1.067 ± 0.005

Physical Properties- Cured

SPETEC PUR F400

Tensile Strength (ASTM 03574-03) 290psi

Elongation at break ±1 00%

Properties will vary depending on application conditions.

CONSUMPTION

Consumption has to be assessed on site and is influenced by the amount of water leaking, thickness of the concrete slab or wall, presence of voids in and around the concrete, etc.

REACTION TIMES Reaction Rate with GEN ACC Accelerator

% 40•F 60°F n·F

% Start End Start End Start End

10 21" 72" 14" 59" 14" 47"

Reaction Rate with G EN ACC Special Accelerator

% 41•F s9•F n•F

% Start End Start End Start End

10 60" 165" 24" 104" 17" 73"

PACKAGING . . , .

SPETEC PUR F400 is supplied in 5 Gallon Pails. GEN ACC and GEN ACC Special are supplied in 0 .5 gallon bottles.

STORAGE AND SHELF LIFE

Store between sao- 80° F (10°- N C).

SAFTEY PRECAUTIONS

Avoid contact with eyes and skin, always use personal protective equipment in compliance with local regulations. Read the relevant Safety Data Sheet before use. Safety Data Sheets are available on www.alchemy-spetec.com When in doubt contact Alchemy-Spetec Technical Service.

FOR INDUSTRIAL USE ONLY. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN. NOT FOR INTERNAL CONSUMPTION. READ MATERIAL SAFETY DATASHEET PRIOR TO EVERY USE.

© 2018 Alchemy-Spetec. All rights reseved SPETEC PUR F400 • Rev. 053119 ALCHeMYISpetec www.alchemy-spetec.com- Tech Support: 404-618-0438 ATTACHMENT B

K•DSUPPLY. CASH C.O.D 11 111111111111111 1111111111 1111111111111 CONSTRUCTION & INDUSTRIAL WHITECAP 023 - Stockton 1166 South Wilson Way QUOTE 35311297 S tockton, CA, 95205 (209) 944-9541

Sold To: 10000202145 S hip To: CONDOR EARTH , I00025 17 179 CAS H/CONDOR EARTH 2 1663 BRIAN LANE 17857 HIGH SCHOOL RD SONORA, CA, 95370 JAMESTOWN, CA, 95327 J ob Site Contact: SCOTT LEWIS Job Site Phone: 209-532-036 1 Map #:

06:1 8 PM Orde r e d By: SCOTT LEWIS C ontact Phone : 209-5320361

Ouote Number Quote Date Valid Until Request Date Sales Person I 353 11 297 I 0/29/20 19 10/29/20 19 No Sales Credit Terms Sbippin2 Method Quote Name Customer PO Created Bv I C OD DIREC T SHIP F400 PENDING M arconi. A LN Part# Description Ord Quantity U/M Price Amount I HIM UnitWT coo I

1.1 SP/F400-5-2 5GAL SPETEC PUR F400 4 1 EA $355.00 $ 14,555.00 THIS ITEM IS SPEC IAL ORDER AND MAY BE NON-RETURNABLE

50 LBS

3.1 SP/GENACC-0.5-3 112 Gallon Bottles, Case of 4 II cs $254.00 $2,794.00 THIS ITEM IS SPECIAL ORDER AN D MAY BE NON-RETURNAB LE

18 LBS

4.1 FR EIG HT INBOUND FREIG HT I USD $1,150.00 $ 1' 150.00

5. 1 SP/PUM PCL-5-1 SPET EC PUMP CLEAN ER 5GA; 6 PL Sl60.00 $960.00 T HI S ITEM IS SPEC IAL ORDER AN D MAY BE NON-RETURNABLE

50 LBS

6.1 4 12A CA300 BX 5 LB BOX OAKUM DRY JUTE RO PE 3 EA $46.00 $ 138.00 26 PCS 1-114" X 27' ALCHEMY SPETEC

5 LBS

Shipped amount $19,597.00 O rde r charges $0.00 T ax amount $1,420.80 L umber Tax rate/amount 1.00% $0.00 Q u ote tota l $21 ,017.80

P age I of 2 Shipped Weight: 2,563.00 Customer acceptance signature: ______~Date: ______

ALL ITEMS AND QUANTITIES REQUIRE CUSTOMER REVIEW AND APPROVAL AVAILABILITY AND LEAD TIMES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE SPECIAL ORDERED ITEMS ARE SUBJECT TO MANUFACTURER APPROVAL PRIOR TO RETURN. QUOTE IS SUBJECT TO EXPIRATION AS INDICATED IN THE ABOVE DATE.

Page2of2 WATERMARK

ENGINEERING INC.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT

I Watermark Engineering, Inc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is effective as of January 1, 2019, (the "Effective Date") by and between the Tri-Dam Project, a partnership of the Oakdale and South San Joaquin Irrigation Districts, irrigation districts governed by the provisions of Division 11 of the California Water Code (collectively, "Client"); and Watermark Engineering, Inc. ("Consultant").

In consideration of the promises herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows: ·

1. Services: Client and Consultant agree Consultantwill perform the following general services: Operating and maintaining gages and providing flow data per USGS guidelines

Services to be provided by Consultant ("Work") are specifically described in the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference. Client may engage consultant to perform additional services beyond the Scope of Work upon execution of a written amendment I work release.

Consultant's only employee is Patrick Stiehr, P.E. Co(lsultant may engage subconsultants to assist in carrying out the Work. In addition, Cpnsultant may add key personnel to assist in performing the Work by written approval of Client. However, where key personnel are subsequently unable to perform the .Work due to .. absenc$, leave, or termination of employment, Client approval shall not be required but Consultant shall notify Client of the change. · ·

2. Term of Agreement. This Agrklement shall be effective immediately and shall remain in effect unless .amended pursuant to Section 18.or terminated pursuant to Section 19 herein.

3. Schedule for Performance. Consultant shl;lll perform the Work as expeditiously as is consistert with generally accepted standards of professional skill and care and the orderly progress of work. "· -- 4. Compensation and Price 'Ceiling. The compensation to be paid by Client to Consultant for the Work shall.be.on a tim~ a(ld materials basis in accordance with the Summary of Costs attached hereto 9s·Exhib,jt B,. The Summary of Costs schedule shall be effective for the duration of performarce ofthe Work, unless otherwise negotiated by the parties, approved by Client's Board of Directors, and consented to in writing by Client as an amendment to this Agreement.

Total compensation to Consultant for Work performed under this Agreement, including fees and expenses, shall not exc~ed the total costs detailed in the Summary of Costs.

5. Invoicing and Payment. Consultant shall submit periodic invoices, not more frequently than monthly, for the services rendered during the preceding period. All invoices are to be sent to the Client's Accounts Payable department with the project name listed on the invoice, and must indicate the hours actually worked by each classification as well as all other directly­ related costs. Client shall approve or disapprove said invoice within ten (10) days following

1 of 12 Watermark Engineering 1 Inc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

receipt thereof, and shall pay, within thirty (30) days' approval, all approved invoices. Client reserves the right to withhold payment of disputed specific items and shall give notice to the Consultant, pursuant to Section 6 herein, of all such disputed specific items within ten (10) days following receipt of billing or invoices. The parties shall exercise good faith and diligence in the resolution of any disputed invoiced amounts.

6. Notices. Any notices or other communications to be given to any party pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by delivering same in writing to the parties at the addresses set forth below:

"CLIENT" "CONSULTANT" Tri-Dam Project Watermari<'Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 1158 3153 Jenna Court Pinecrest, California 95364-0158 Roseville, CA. 95747 Attn: Jeff Shields, Interim General Manager Attn: Patrick Stiehr Telephone: (209) 965-3996 Telephone: (916) 774-1111 Facsimile: (209) 965-4235

With courtesy copies to:

Oakdale Irrigation District 1205 E. F Street Oakdale, California 95361 Attn: Steve Knell, General Manager Telephone: (209) 847-0341 Facsimile: (209) 847c3468 )

South San Joaquin Irrigation Oi~rict P.O. Box 747 ' I Ripon, Califorlli? 95366-0747 Attn: Peter M. Rietkerk, General Manager Telephone: (209) 249-4600 · Facsimile: (209) 249~4688

' ' Notice shall be deemed given when deposited into the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the parties at the,addresses above. Nothing shall preclude the giving of personal notice or notice by e"mail or lac~imile machine provided, however, that notice by e-mail or facsimile machine shall be follow~d by notice deposited into the United States mail as set forth above.

7. Independent Contractor: It is understood and agreed that Consultant is an independent contractor and nothing in this Agreement should be construed to create a partnership, joint venture, or employer-employee relationship: a. Consultant, in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, is subject to the control or direction of Client as to the designation of tasks to be performed, and the work to be accomplished but not the means, methods or sequence used by Consultant for accomplishing the work. Client shall have the right to guide the Consultant's work efforts, but not direct the results nor the manner or the means by which the work is performed. b. If, in the performance of this Agreement, any third persons are employed by

2 of 12 Watermark Engineering, Inc. Professional SeiVices Agreement 2019-PSA-04

Consultant, such persons shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. All terms of employment, including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging, or any other terms of employment or requirements of law, shall be determined by Consultant. c. Consultant and Consultant's employees are not authorized to act as agent for, or make any representation, contract, or commitment on behalf of Client. d. Consultant shall not be entitled to any benefits payable to employees of Client. e. Client will not make any deductions or with holdings from the compensation payable to Consultant under this Agreement, and will not withhold or make payments for social security; make unemployment insurance or disability insurance contributions; or obtain worker's compensation insurance on Consultant's behalf. f. Consultant will be solely responsible for all tax returns and payments required to be filed with or made to any federal, state or local tax authority with respect to Consultant's performance of services and receipt of fees under this Agreement. Consultant agrees to accept exclusive liability for complying With all applicable state and federal laws governing self-employed individuals, including obligations such as payment of taxes, social security, disability and other contributions based on fees paid to Consultant, its agents or employees under this Agreement. Consultant hereby agrees to indemnify and defend Client against any and all such taxes or contributions, including penalties and interest. · '>, g. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds Client harmless from any and all claims that may be made against Glienfbased upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relati6n$hip exists by reason ·of this Agreement.

8. Authority of Consultant. It is understood that Corisultantis to provide information, research, advice, recommendations and consulting services to Client. Consultant shall not possess any authority with respectto any decision ofCiient. Client is responsible for, and shall make all policy decisions ~rt(lated to, theJN,ork perfdrrried-by Consultant. "" . . 9. Potential Conflicts 'at lr\tere~t. a. Cohsllltant shalldisdose its involvemeritirl any projects which may be directly affected by actions taken by Client based on the services provided hereunder. Consultant shall · not write a proprietary specification for material, equipment, or service from companies in which it holds a beneficial interest. b. Consultant certifies that ifh;;JS·disclosed to Client any actual, apparent or potential conflicts of interesf!hat may 'exist relative to the services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant hereby agrees to advise Client in writing of any actual, apparent, or potential cpnflicts of interest that may develop subsequent to the date of execution" of this ~gree'ment and shall give such notice pursuant to Section 6 herein, within ten (10) days of Consultant's knowledge of such conflict. District reserves the right to requireCorisultantto submit a financial disclosure statement. c. Consultant agrees to refrain from other engagements that may present an actual, apparent or potential conflict of interest with respect to the work covered by this Agreement. Consultant may request a waiver of these requirements from District. The request for a waiver must be in writing and shall contain a disclosure and description of the actual, apparent or potential conflict of interest and Consultant's reasons and justification for requesting such a waiver. The request shall be submitted to District pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement.

3 of 12 Watennark Englneering, Inc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

10. Ownership of Work Product. All technical data, evaluations, plans, specifications, maps, drawings, images, reports or other work product of Consultant prepared pursuant to this Agreement constitute work made for hire ("Work Product"). a. All Work Product shall be delivered to Client upon completion of the services authorized hereunder, and shall become, the property of Client, and Client shall be the copyright holder thereof. Client shall have the right to make and retain copies and use all Work Product; provided, however, the use shall be limited to the intended use for which the services and Work Products are provided under this Agreement. Client agrees to indemnify and hold Consultant harmless if Work Product Is used for other than its original intended purpose. b. Consultant retains no rights to use the Work Prod1,1cb;md agrees not to challenge the validity of Client's rights or ownership in the Work Product. Consultant may retain copies of the Work Product for its files and i[llernal'use. Consultant's publication or release of any or all of the information directly derived from work performed or data obtained in connection with services rel')dered under !.his Agreement must first be approved in writing by Client. · · c. If Consultant has any rights to the Plienl Work ProduCt that cannot be assigned to Client, (a) Consultant unconditionally and irrevocably waives the, enforcement of such rights, including all claims and causes of action of any kind ag·ajns(Client with respect to such rights, and agrees, at Client's 'request and expense, to consent to and join in any action to enforce such rights, and (b) Consultant uncondilioni:illy}md irrevocably grants to Client during the term of such rights, .an exclusive, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide, fully paid and roya!ly-free license, wit,h rights to sublicense through multiple levels of sublicensees, to reproduce, create derivative works of, distribute, publicly perform, and publicly display by .all means hoyv known or_later developed, such rights.

11. Indemnification. Consultant, .py execution of this Agreemeri, specifically agrees to hold harmless, defend and indemnify'Qistrlct, its.officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all actions, claims, losl>, liability, damage and expense arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligent, reckless, or willful misconduct of Consultant, Consultant's employees or subconsultarits engaged by Consultant in conrie,ction with the work of Consultant pursuant to lhe.terms of this Agreement, excepting only sbch injury and harm as may be caused solely andexclusively by Cl_ien!'s sole n.E')gligence,-.willful misconduct or active negligence. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to Consultant exceed Consultant's professional's proportionate percentage ·Of faufi.· Suc;h indemnity shall extend to claims, demands, or liabilities, of every kind or nature whatsoever including, but not limited to, personal injury, wrongful deatr, and proper(y damage occurring during and/or after completion of the Work. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, if Consultant is a design professional, as de.fined byS!'J'ction 2782.8(b)(2) of The Civil Code of the State of California, or its successor, then sucttdesign professional shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, and hold Client harmless from and against any and all liabilities, losses or damages, arising out of or encountered in connection with this Agreement or the prosecution of work under it to the extent such, liabilities, losses or damages, are actually caused by the negligence of such design professional or its agents, employees, or subcontractors, or their agents or employees. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Client, Its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers.

12. Insurance. During the performance of the Services under this Agreement, Consultant and each subconsultant retained by Consultant shall maintain at their own expense the following insurance:

4of 12 Watermark Engineering, inc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

(1) General Liability Insurance, with a combined single limit of $1,000,000 for each occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate.

(2) Automobile Liability Insurance, with a combined single limit of $1,000,000 for each person and $1 ,000,000 for each accident.

(3) Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with Section 3700 of the California Labor Code and Employers' Liability Insurance Act, with a limit of $1,000,000 for each occurrence. Consultant shall provide a certificate of compliance in the form attached as Exhibit C.

(4) Errors and Omissions or other applicable Professional Liability coverage in the minimum amount of $1 ,000,000.

Said insurance will be evidenced by certificatiOn filed with th!'l Client as otherwise specified by this Agreement. All policies shall name "the Oakdale Irrigation District, the South San Joaquin Irrigation District, the Tri~Dam Project, and each of their respective directors, officers, employees and volunteers" as additional insureds on the General Commercial Liability and Automobile Liability policies.

a. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability Insurance: Consultant shall provide and maintain commefcial general liability and automobile liability insurance as set forth in this Agreement. · ··

1. Coverage:.· Coverage for comml;lrcial general liability arid automobile liability insurance shall be at leasr as bro.ad as the following: \ . ·.• .'. . . . " i. lnsllrance Services Office ('!ISO") Commercial General Liability Coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001); and

ii. . ISO Bu~i~~ss. Auto Cov~rage\F~rm. CA 0001 ), covering Symbol .1 (any auto).

2. . Limits: Con~ultant shall maintain limits no less than the following limits:

X :~ -- _, < i. General liability of One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit or products-completed operations aggregate "limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the project/location (with the ISO CG 2503, or ISO CG 2504, or insurer's equivalent endorsement provided to Client) or the general aggregate limit and products-completed operations aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; and

ii. Automobile Liability of One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) for bodily injury and property damage each accident limit.

3. Required Provisions: The General Liability and Automobile Liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

5 of 12

. Watermark Engineering, Inc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

i. "The South San Joaquin Irrigation District, and each of their respective directors, officers, employees, and authorized volunteers are to be given insured status (ISO endorsement CG 2010, CG 2033, or insurer's equivalent for general liability coverage) as respect to liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; and automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant." The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to Client, its directors, officers, employees., or authorized volunteers;

ii. For any claims related to the Services, Consultant's insurance shall be the primary insurance, and any insurance·; self-insurance, or other coverage maintained by Client, shall be non-contributory.

iii. Any failure by Consultant to comply with reporting or other provisions of the insurance policies including·but not limited to' a breach of any warranties contained therein shall not affect coverage provided to Client, its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers; and .

iv. Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each in!)Llred against whom a claim is made. or suit is brought, ·exqept with respect to the limits of the insurer's liabiiity. ·

4. Subrogation: Consultant .shall waive all rights of ;~brogation against Client.

b. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liabilitylnsur<~nce: Consultant and all sub­ contractors shall insure (or be a quiilified.self;irisur!ld) under the applicable laws relating to Worker's 'compensation i~surance, aH_of their employees working on or about the construction site, in_ accordance with th~ '{,Workers' Compensation and Insurance Act." Division IV of the Labor Code' ofth-iJ State 9f\:;alifornia and any Acts amendatory thereof. Consultant shall provide employer's liability ir)surance with limits of no less than One Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) each accidenl,cOne Million Dollars ($1 ,000,000) disease · policy limit, and One Million Dollars ($1',000,000) disease each employee. ' . If Consultant is a Sole Proprietor, a Sole Proprietor Business Affidavit Form must be on file with the Cli13nt prior to the ~~art of !he Work or providing Services.

c. Deductibles and Self-lnsJred Retentions: Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared td and approved by Client. / d. Acceptability of ln~ur~rs: Consultant shall purchase the policies of insurance required under this Agreement from insurers having a current A.M. Best Financial Strength Rating of no less than A, and Financial Size Category of no less than VII or as otherwise approved by Client

e. Evidence of Insurance: Evidence of the insurance coverage required to be maintained by Consultant under this Agreement, as represented by Certificates of Insurance and all required endorsements issued by the insurance carrier, must be furnished to Client prior to Consultant starting the Work. Such Certificates of Insurance/endorsement shall state that Client will be notified in writing thirty (30) days prior to cancellation of insurance. Timely renewal certificates will be provided to Client.

6 of 12 Watermark Engineering, Inc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

f. Continuation of Coverage: If any of the required coverages expire during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall deliver all applicable renewal certificates to Client at least ten (1 0) days prior to the expiration date.

13. Confidentiality. consultant shall not, either during or after the term of this Agreement, disclose to any third party, any confidential information relative to the work of Client without the prior written consent of Client.

14. Non-Discrimination in Employment. Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment or volunteer because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, or physical, mental handicap or any other basis prohibited by applicable Jaw . .a. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure thafapplicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, national origin, age, physical or. mental handicap or any other basis prohibited by applicable Jaw. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, promotion, demotion or transfer; recruitment or advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; or selection for training, including apprenticeship. Consultant agrees to post in 'conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices that Consultant shall provide an atmosphere ·free of harassment as prohibited by applicable law for employees, clients, and V(JIU~teers.

b. Consultant shall, in all solicttations br advertisements for employees, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion; sex, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap or any other basis prohibited by appltcable law. · · · I - ' ,_ \ . .. . ' 15. Financial Recordli; Consultant shall retain all financial records, including, but no(limited to, documents, reports, books and accounting records which pertain to any work or transaction performed pursuant to this Agreement forfour ( 4) years after the expiration of this Agreement. Either District or any duly authorized representative of Client shall, with reasonable notice, have ac<:esi';'to and the right to exahli(le,audit and copy such records.

16. Compliaifce with Laws; Labor Code Provisions. It is the responsibility of the Consultant and any subconsultant to comply with all federal, state and local laws and regulations applicable to Consultant and any subconsultant, including provisions of DIVISION 2, PART 7 of the California Labor Code, and those provisions governing the payment of prevailing wages, working hours, overtime, the employment 'of apprentices and record keeping requirements. Copies of the prevailing rate of per .diem wages are available at District's principal office and will be made available to any interested party on request. The following sections of the California Labor Code are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement and will be made available by District upon request: Section 1771 (prevailing wage requirement,) Section 1810 (eight hour workday,) Section 1813 (penalty for failure to pay overtime,) Section 1777.5 (apprenticeship requirements); Section 1776 (recordkeeping requirements) and Section 1771.4 (job site posting).

17. Assignment. Consultant may not assign its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of Client, which may be granted or withheld in Client's sole discretion.

18. Amendments. Modification or amendments to the terms of this Agreement shall be approved

7 of 12 Watermark Engineering, Inc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

by Client's Board of Directors, and consented to in writing by Client as an amendment to this Agreement, and executed by all parties.

19. Termination. Either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by serving upon the other party thirty (30) days' advance written notice of termination. The notice shall be deemed served and effective for all purposes on the date it is deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed to Consultant at the address indicated in Section 6. In the event of such notice of termination: a. Consultant shall, as directed by Client or on such other mutually acceptable terms, proceed with the orderly shutdown of project activities, cease rendering further services and proceed with archiving of project materials. b. Consultant shall deliver to Client copies of al_l writi'ngs and other Work Product prepared pursuant to this Agreement. The term· ")Nri£ings" shall be construed to mean and include handwriting, typewriting, computer tile~ and records, drawings, blueprints, printing, photostating, photographing, an(:! eyery other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication:or representation, Including letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof. · c. Client shall have full ownership and corftrol of all such writings delivered by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. , _ d. Client shall pay Consultant for work performed until the effective date of termination, subject to the limitations prescribed by Sections 4and 5 of this Agr'e\)(hent. / ~-· 20. No Rule of Strict Construction. Ttleparlies agree thatthis Agreement and any amendments or exhibits hereto shall be construed without regard to any presumption or rule requiring construction against the party causing such instrument or any portion thereof to be drafted, or in favor of the party receiving a particular benefit under the A!:]reement. No rule of strict construction sh

21. Applicable Law; Ve~ue, This _Agreement s~all be governed by, construed, and enforced in accorgance with, the laws of the State of California. Any claims or litigation arising under this '. -. '• - \ -, Agreement shall be brought by the p~rties in the Superior Court of California, County of Stanislaus. . - ../

22. Survival. The ownership of )Nark product provisions of Section 10, the indemnity provisions of Section 11, the coqfidentiality provisions of Section 13 and the inspection provisions of Section 15 shall survive the expiration or other termination of this Agreement.

23. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with the exhibits hereto, Is_ the final, complete, and exclusive agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and merges all prior discussions between the parties. No modification of or amendment to this Agreement, nor any waiver of any rights under this Agreement, will be effective unless in writing and signed by Client and Consultant.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this A!:]reement as of the dates Indicated below; provided, however, that the A!:]reement shall be deemed effective as of the Effective Date identified above.

8 of 12 Watermark Engineering, Inc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

CLIENT CONSULTANT

Oakdale Irrigation District Watermark Engineering, Inc.

Tom Orvis, President Date Patrick Stiehr Date

South San Joaquin Irrigation District ··

Dave Kamper, President Date

9 of 12 Watermark Engineering, inc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK

Continuation of Tri-Dam's streamgaging program, including streamflow monitoring and compilation of data and furnished records in accordance with USGS guidelines. Specific station sites and costs as detailed in attached Exhibit B, as approved by the Tri­ Dam Board of Directors on September 20, 2018.

10of12 Watermark Engineering, Inc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

EXHIBIT "8" BUDGET I RATE AND FEE SCHEDULE

Per attached Watermark proposal dated July 27, 2018

11 of 12 y Watermark Engineering, Inc. - DATE: July 27, 2018

TO: Ron Berry, General Manager TriDam Project

FROM: Patrick Stiehl\ P.E.

RE: Proposal for Stream Gaging Services for Water Years 2019 through 2024

STREAM GAGING SERVICES

The following table provides a sununary of the proposed individual and total costs for live years of operating and maintaining the gages and providing !low data per USGS guidelines. Scope also includes all coordination efforts tbr USGS annual review of all gages except 887, S99 and S1 01.

··----- Tab c l. s ununary of Costs Tl'i· WY WY WY WY WY Dam USGS# STATION NAME 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ID - $ $ $ $ $ MF Stanislaus R 887 11-292615 Low-Flow Release 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 blw Donnell Lake MF Stanislaus R bl w S88 11-292700 14,400 14,600 14,800 15,000 15,200 -- Hells Half Ac -- MF Stanislaus blw 11-292900 12,800 12,900 13,000 13,100 13,200 889 Beardsley Dam Oakdale ID Canal nr 7,800 7,900 8,000 S96 11-300500 Knights Fen·y 7,700 8,100 South San Joaquin lD S97u 11-301000 7,700 7,800 7,900 8,000 8,100 Canal - Stanislaus R blw 11-302000 13,000 13,100 13,200 13,400 13,600 S98 Goodwin Dam -SSJID Main Canal S99 NA 7,000 7,100 7,200 7,250 7,300 blw Division -- OlD Nmth Main blw SIOI 7,000 7,100 7,200 7,250 7,300 NA Division Totals 71,400 72,300 73,200 74,100 75,000 Note: Serv1ces mclude stage and valve fiows at S87 only, and temperature record at S88.

3153 Jenna Colll't Phone: 916-774- II II, Fax: 916· 774-1181 Roseville, CA 95747 Mobile: 916- 715- 1167, email: [email protected] PERSONNEL

The staff that will provide the gaging services includes Patrick Stiehr, Bill Slightam, his staff at Western Hydt'Ologlc Systems (http://westernhydro.net), and an additional hydrographer as needed.

Patriclc Stleln· has been doing almost all of the gaging work fol' the past 20 years. He will continue to manage the work hut will tl'!U'lSfer some of the :field work to Western Hydrologic Systems. He also had 5 years of gaging experience while working at the US Geological Survey. In addition, Mr. Stlehr has a Master's Degree in Civil Bngiueerh1g, Water Resmu·ces Plauning and Marlagemcut and Ia a licensed Civil Engineer. He has extensive training and experience in open ohaunel hydraulics and hydrology and hydraulics modeling, The focl\S of Watermark Engineel'ing is stream gaging and water l'esources engineering related to drainage hydrology and hydraulics.

The new membet'S of the team are Bill Sliglltan and his staff oftwo hydrographe!'S. They are headquartered in Camino, Ca, and have 20+ years of stresm gaging experience in the Upper American River watershed, as well as gaging in Solano, Napa, and Lassen counties, These hydrographers will be integrated into the :field work over the next year, along wi1l1 the analysis, production, and review of the ·s1reamflow records over the next several yents. They are familiar with the USGS review process and currently service gages that are reviewed by the USGS.

REFERENCES

Following is a list of refete11oes that cover both s'l:l'eant gaging and wa1:e!' resources engineering, ( ; Please note that Jerry Smithson could also be considered a reference for Watermark Engineering . .... NAME ORGANIZATION PHONE RELATIONSHIP Jeff Wauless, West Yost & Associates Gaging for City of Engineer 2020 Research Dr, Ste 100 530.792.3245 Vacaville & Water Davis, CA 95618 Resources Engr Mark Rains, County of Sacramento, WR Gaging & Water Engineer 827 7th Street 916.874,8649 Resources Sact·amento, CA 95814 Enu;ineering .Terry R.ockwel~ Catnellan Bay Field Office Stt·emn Gaging & USGS Uc Tahoe, POBox 1360 530. 546. 0187 Open Chn! Hydraulics retired Carnelian Bay, CA 96140

Additional resume information and refe1·ences are available upon request. I look forward to a favorable decision and would be readily available to discuss this proposal.' Thank yOll fur this opportunity and your consideration.

Please call or email if there are questions or if additional huormation is needed.

C:\Uaet•s\gmodt-ell\AppData\I..ooal\Milllosoft\Wlndows\!NetCaohe\ContentOutlook\CDD1QKBQ\OaglngProposal·7·27· 18,doox pg 2 of2 Watermark Engineering, lnc. Professional Services Agreement 2019-PSA-04

EXHIBIT "C" WORKERS COMPENSATION CERTIFICATION

Labor Code Section 3700 provides, in pertinent part: "Every employer except the state shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways: (a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this state; or (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self-insure either and to pay any compensation that may become due.to his or her employees __ ."

. I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the ~abor Code which' requires every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Cohtract.

"CONSULTANT"

By:. ______Dated:~------~

Name:. ______~--~----

Title: ______

12of12 RESOLUTION TOP 2019.10

ELECT NEVV SECRETARY

AND GENERAL MANAGER TRI-DAM PROJECT RESOLUTION NO. TOP 2019.10

RESOLUTION ELECTING NEW SECRETARY AND GENERAL MANAGER

WHEREAS, the appointment of a new Secretary and General Manager is necessary to replace the departing General Manager and Secretary, Ron Berry, and the interim General Manager and Secretary, Jeff Shields; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the appointment of Jarom Zimmerman as General Manager, effective December 2, 2019 is hereby confirmed;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jarom Zimmerman is hereby appointed Secretary, effective December 2, 2019;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jarom Zimmerman, General Manager and Secretary is now acting and is qualified to sign checks, deposits, written instructions, consents, stock certificates or other securities, on behalf of Tri-Dam Project, that the specimen signature appearing opposite his name and title is his genuine signature, that said resolution appointing this officer is in full force and effect, and that such appointment shall remain in effect until rescinded;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that as such Secretary, he shall have the following duties:

1. Act in the capacity of Secretary in all matters pertaining to the Tri-Dam Project and handle appropriate and related correspondence and other pertinent matters. 2. Accumulate, file and store all records and invoices and have all invoices properly audited and checked and certified for payment. 3. Prepare vouchers and warrants to be presented to the Joint Board for approval. 4. Execute on behalf of the Joint Board all certificates and other necessary documents related to the Tri-Dam Project. 5. Supervise the installation of an adequate and uniform accounting system and adequate and uniform record of all financial transactions in connection with the Tri-Dam Project. 6. Do and perform all other acts and duties as may be designated from time to time by the Joint Board.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jarom Zimmerman, General Manager, is hereby designated to sign checks drawn against funds on deposit with Oak Valley Community Bank, and that such designation shall remain in effect until rescinded.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the foregoing signature authority granted to Jarom Zimmerman is subject to any Project resolution or agreement that requires more than one signature of the Project, including the signature of an officer named in resolution TOP 2019.11, to be effective.

General Manager and Secretary: Jarom Zimmerman Signature. ______PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of November 2019, by the Directors of the Tri-Dam Project by the following vote:

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT S. SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Thomas D. Orvis, President Dave Kamper, President

Steve Knell, Secretary Peter Rietkerk, Secretary RESOLUTION TOP 2019.11

AUTHORIZATION FOR MAINTENANCE OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS TRI-DAM PROJECT RESOLUTION NO. TOP 2019.11 Oakdale Irrigation District South San Joaquin Irrigation District

AUTHORIZATION FOR MAINTENANCE OF BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS

WHEREAS, the Joint Board of Directors of said Tri-Dam Project desires that specific persons be authorized to sign checks;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the persons designated to sign checks on the checking account, effective December 2, 2019, together with their respective titles, are as follows:

BANK: Oak Valley Community Bank California Local Agency Investment Fund US Bank

CHECK SIGNATORIES:

Jarom Zimmerman, General Manager, Tri-Dam Project Rick Dodge, Finance and Administration Manager, Tri-Dam Project Steve Knell, General Manager, Oakdale Irrigation District Peter M. Rietkerk, General Manager, South San Joaquin Irrigation District Sharon Cisneros, Chief Financial Officer, Oakdale Irrigation District Bere Lindley, Asst. General Manager, South San Joaquin Irrigation District

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that two signatures from the "CHECK SIGNATORIES" listed above are required on checks.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of November 2019 by the following vote.

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT S. SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT . S. SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

Tom D. Orvis, President Dave Kamper, President

Steve Knell, Secretary Peter M. Rietkerk, Secretary UNREPRESENTED

STAFF RECOGNITION FISHBIO

PRESENTATION

2020 BUDGET PROPOSAL ------~FJSHBIO ------

TO: Tri-Dam Project Board of Directors FROM: Doug Demko and Andrea Fuller DATE: November 8, 2019 SUBJECT: 2019 Accomplishments and Potential 2020 Activities and Budget

This memorandum is a brief review of some of our accomplishments during 2019 and a proposed budget for life-cycle monitoring, the Native Fish Plan, publications, and legal suppott during 2020. Similar to previous years, I am looking forward to attending the November meeting and providing a more in-depth review of our activities. I've attached summary tables of our 2017 and proposed 2018 budgets (Table I), and a summary table of progress on our multi-year analyses/publications task (Table 2).

In 2019 we again did our best to operate efficiently and complete the year under budget, and as you know life-cycle monitoring costs are also influenced by salmon abundance, flow, and weather cot'Jditions. The average cost of lifecycle monitoring averaged approximately $571 ,000 during 2013-2018, and we expect to use the full budget of $550,000 in 2019. We request that the same budget of $550,000 be allocated for lifecycle monitoring to continue in 2020, and this includes weir operations, redd surveys, rotary screw trap operation at Oakdale, and summer 0. mykiss snorkel surveys.

The WIIN Act requires the Districts and NOAA Fisheries to jointly establish a nonnative predator research and pilot fish removal program in the Stanislaus River to investigate whether a removal program is an effective strategy to improve overall conditions for native fish, specifically the survival of juvenile salmonids. Limited sampling was permitted in June 2018, and in 2019 we were finally permitted to conduct nearly a full season of sampling (missed February due to permitting) to estimate abundance and distribution of predators. A limited predator relocation effort was also permitted in 2019 along with assessments of predation risk before and after. We continue to work with NMFS and CDFW to obtain approval to remove predators in 2020, which is a key requirement of the WIIN Act.

Our suggested budgets for consulting and publications remain the same as recent years. Consulting activities expected to continue in 2020 include monitoring and participating in the new Stanislaus Watershed Team (successor to the Stanislaus River Forum and Stanislaus Ops Group); providing continued input on New Melones operations, NMFS Biological Opinion, and the State water Resources Control Board Water Quality Control Plan; and providing on-call support. Consulting activities have also included sampling of off-channel habitats during high flow events in some years, including in 2019, and we expect to conduct more surveys if high flows occur again in 2020.

During 2019 we completed papers on the Long-term monitoring of juvenile Chinook Salmon on the Stanislaus River from 1996 to present: implications for rotary screw trap programs and spawning habitat utilization. The rotary screw trap paper was published, providing a peer reviewed methodology for estimating juvenile salmon abundance. These estimates are foundational to evaluating timing, migratory behavior, and influence of flow, understanding limitations on juvenile salmon production, and assessing juvenile salmon productivity. The first two evaluations were initiated in 2019. The latter is recommended for ------~FISHBIO ------

2020 and is a common approach in fisheries which was recently recommended by an expert panel for the State Water Resources Control Board to use in developing biological objectives. Pa1t s of this approach have been used for previous analyses and we propose to conduct a more comprehensive assessment.

The spawning habitat paper has been selected and will be also be published soon. As with the rotary screw trap abundance estimates, this paper also provid es important information for other manuscripts under development and proposed for 2020.

T a bl e 1. 2020 P otenha. I A ctJvatJes. . . an dBu d1get 2019 2019 2020 Service Description Estimate Projected Suggested

. Rotary screw trap Life-cycle . Weir $550,000 $550,000 $550,000 Monitoring . Redd surveys . Rainbow trout abundance • Continued NM ops, BiOp, SWRCB WQCP Consul ting . Biological review and tech $ 100,000 $100,000 $100,000 memos • On-call legal support . Timing, migratory behavior, influence of flow on juvenile salmon . Spawning habitat use Data . Limitations on juvenile Analysis/ $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 salmon producti on Publication . Factors that drive 0. mykiss production . Productivity assessment using stock-recruit model . Assess non-native fi sh Native assemblage $1,000,000 $800,000 $1 ,000,000 Fish Plan . Remove predators

Total $1,750,000 $1,550,000 $1,750,000 ------~FISHBIO ------

Table 2 Publication Top1cs for 2017-2018

Publication Conclusion Timeframe

Long-term monitoring of juvenile Chinook Salmon on Updated methods to estimate the Stanislaus River from juvenile abundance Completed 1996 to present: Flow and fish size primary implications for rotary factors associated with catch screw trap programs

Timing, migratory behavior, Pulse flows may not flush fish and influence of flow on from river or increase smolt 10% outmigrating juvenile survival complete Chinook salmon in the Juvenile production may benefit Stanislaus River from flood control releases

Timing and location of spawning appears to be consistent over wide range of escapement and environmental Spawning habitat utilization conditions using redd survey Completed data • Superimposition may be occurring even at low to moderate levels of escapement Limitations of juvenile • Uses spawning habitat Chinook salmon production utilization analysis combined 60% on the Stanislaus River: the with juvenile abundance complete role of water temperature estimates and superimposition • Abundance 2009- 2019 Factors that drive • Examines the role of seasonal Oncorhynchus mykiss 75% and monthly water temperatures abundance in the Stanislaus complete and discharge on abundance and River density over survey period

• Ability to better understand how Understanding population salmon population fluctuates productivity of Chinook under varying environmental Planned salmon in the Stanislaus conditions 2020 River using a stock­ • Juvenile production at Oakdale recruitment covariate model at carrying capacity at relatively low escapement levels 2020

DRAFT BUDGET ---~ Tri-Dam Project TRI-DAM PROJECf 2020 Draft Budget

Summary The 2020 draft budget for Tri-Dam Project has been developed under the assumption of an average water year with average generation of 450,000 MWh. However, as in past years, certain O&M and capital projects may be deferred should the watershed experience below normal precipitation, snow pack, or significant unanticipated outages.

Generation revenue is budgeted at $35.1 million, which corresponds to $78 per MWh, as set forth in the existing power purchase agreement with the City of Santa Clara (Silicon Valley Power). Budgeted generation revenue for 2020 is approximately $3.5 million less than anticipated 2019 generation revenue, primarily due to the exceptional2019 water year as compared to a budgeted average water year. Net profit is budgeted to total $17.5 million for financial statement purposes, while cash fiow (including capital expenditures and before District distributions) is projected to approximate $17.1 million. Cash fiow budgeted for 2020 is approximately $13.1 million less than 2019 expected cash fiow. Operating expenses excluding Goodwin Dam costs are budgeted to increase substantially, totaling $15.3 million, broken out between personnel expense of $4.3 million, and other operating expenses of $11.0 million. Non-operating expenses including Goodwin Dam are budgeted at $3.4 million, or an increase of $612,000 from 2019 estimated actual, while capital expenditures are budgeted at $2.5 million, an increase of $1.6 million from 2019.

Revenue Budgeted power generation revenue represents a 9% decrease from anticipated 2019 power generation revenue. The Project enjoyed a very favorable 2018 /2019 water year, which resulted in above average generation for calendar year 2019, in spite of several exceptional dispatch curtailments from the California Independent System Operator, as well as numerous forced outages for PG&E system work.

Other revenue is budgeted at $1.2 million, a nearly $2.6 million decline from 2019 anticipated other revenue. The decrease is attributable to the substantial one-time insurance proceeds received during 2019, which totaled $1.6 million, in addition to FEMA I Cal OES proceeds of $761,000. No insurance proceeds or large reimbursements are included in the 2020 budget.

Other recurring non-generation revenue sources included in the 2020 budget include headwater benefits of $364,000, investment earnings of $310,000, water sales to the Sierra Conservation Center of $166,000, and expense reimbursements from Stockton East Water District for Goodwin Dam and the Bureau of Reclamation for Tulloch Reservoir totaling $116,000 and $98,000, respectively.

11/14/2019 3:58 PM DRAFT Expense Labor and Overhead Total labor and overhead expense is budgeted at $4.5 million (including labor costs associated with Goodwin Dam), representing a $581,000, or 14.7% increase, over 2019 expected actual personnel expense, and a $261,000, or 6.1% increase, to 2019 budgeted personnel expense. The increase over expected 2019 personnel costs is primarily due to the addition of two full-time equivalents in the maintenance department, and one additional FTE in the operations department. The two positions in the maintenance department were budgeted in 2019, but were vacant for most of the year. The overall increase also includes an assumed 3.0% general wage increase and known benefit cost increases for all employees.

Including capitalized labor and personnel costs allocated to Tri-Dam Power Authority, total personnel costs are expected to increase by $603,000, or 12.7% over 2019 anticipated actual. However, it should be noted that 2019 estimated labor costs are expected to be approximately $312,000 below budgeted labor costs. The 2020 draft budget assumes no vacancies during the year and an unchanged budgeted level of overtime hours. As compared to the 2019 budget, and including capitalized labor and costs allocated to the Authority, total personnel costs for 2020 are expected to increase $291,000, or5.8%.

As with past budgets, the 2020 budget does not reflect any impact from GASB 68 pension valuations and the corresponding non-cash impact. However, the 2020 budget does incorporate the known one-time required payment to the Project's unfunded accrued pension liability.

O&M Expense Operating and administrative expenses are budgeted at $2.9 million, representing an $815,000, or 38.9% increase versus expected 2019 expenses. The budgeted increase is primarily attributable to several accounts, including an increase in the Tulloch Reservoir shoreline erosion management plan and corresponding erosion stabilization (up $315,000), a substantial increase in general legal matters (up $176,000), increased FERC administrative fees (up $57,000), and increased insurance premiums (up $48,000). As with several large projects within the budget, the Tulloch shoreline erosion plan and corresponding rock installation and slope stabilization budget reflects a significant estimate that could fluctuate substantially before the plan is finalized. Similarly, the general legal costs will be dependent upon the level of litigation that materializes during the year.

Maintenance expenses are also budgeted to increase considerably from 2019 anticipated actual costs. Of particular note is the commencement of the Tulloch spillway repair, which is budgeted at $2.0 million, while the second phase of the Beardsley A-bay repair is budgeted at $2.5 million. The A-bay repair estimate is at the high end of the engineer's estimate for construction and construction management. These two projects are by far the most costly projects included in the 2020 maintenance budget. Other significant maintenance projects are the Hells Half Acre Road permanent bypass ($150,000), and re-roofing the Tulloch 1&2 powerhouse ($100,000). Total maintenance costs are budgeted at nearly $6.0 million, an increase of $3.3 million from 2019 anticipated total maintenance costs.

Nonoperating Expense Nonoperating expenses (excluding Goodwin Dam expenses) are expected to total $3.1 million, an increase of $660,000 from anticipated 2019 nonoperating expenses. The increase in nonoperating expenses is primarily attributable to the completion of the Stanislaus River Basin Plan (up $639,000), and an increase of $200,000 in the non-native predation study, which is expected to be under budget for 2019 by the same amount. Partially offsetting these increases is a budgeted reduction in water-related legal costs, which are budgeted at $360,000, or $239,000 less than anticipated 2019 water-related legal costs. 11/14/2019 3:58 PM DRAFT Capital Expense Capital expenditures for 2020 are budgeted at $2.5 million, including capitalized Tri-Dam labor of $205,000. As with 2019, the largest budgeted capital project is the Tulloch Reservoir recreation site, which is budgeted at $820,000. Other significant capital expenditures include a new Kenworth TBOO dump truck budgeted at $248,000, and a new water tank above the Beardsley powerhouse budgeted at $138,000. In addition, the budget includes seven separate microwave upgrades throughout the system, all together totaling $312,000.

11/14/2019 3:58 PM DRAFT Tri-Dam Project 2020 Budget Summary - ~ }RI-OAM PROJECT _ (A) ( 8) (C) ( D ) ( E) (F) (G) (H) (I) iJl 1 2017 2018 2019 2020 Average Year Scenario 2 $Change % Changevs $Change vs % Change vs S Change vs 3 Revenue Actual Actual Budget Estimated vs. Budget Budget 2019 Budget 2019 Budget 2019 Estimate 2019 Estimate 4 Sale of Energy s 48,1 14,763 s 21 ,300,521 s 33.919,455 s 38,562,494 s 4,643,039 $ 35,077,578 3.4% s 1 '158, 123 -9.0% s (3,484,916) 5 Headwater Benefits & Other Revenue 976,123 2,161,465 3,977,054 3,753,879 (223, 175) 1,157,127 -70.9 % (2 ,819,927) -69.2% (2,596,751) 6 Total Revenue s 49,090,886 s 23,461 ,986 $ 37,896,509 $ 42,316,373 $ 4,419,864 $ 36,234,706 -4.4% s (1 ,661 ,803) -1 4.4% $ (6,081 ,667) 7 8 Expense 9 L/OH - Operations & Administrative s 2,321,883 s 2,254,409 s 2.144,212 s 2,272,949 s 128,737 $ 2,344,025 9.3% s 199,813 3.1% $ 71 ,076 10 LIOH - Maintenance 1,714,094 1,768,437 1,938,821 1,428,936 (509,885) 1,992,330 2.8% 53,509 39.4% 563,394 11 LIOH - Goodwin Dam 186,684 186,709 185,777 246,697 60,920 193,208 4.0% 7,431 -21 .7% (53,489) 12 Labor & Overhead Expense 4,222,661 4,209,554 4,268,810 3 ,948,582 (320,228) 4,529,563 6 .1% 260,753 14.7% 580,982 13 14 Operations & Administrative 1,826,319 1,853,602 2,398,543 2,095,686 (302,857) 2,910,491 21.3% 511 ,948 38.9% 814,805 15 Maintenance 3 ,090,025 1,118,767 4,138,324 2,690,461 (1, 447,863) 5 ,969,790 44.3% 1,831,466 121 .9% 3,279,329 16 Goodwin Dam 88,075 96,348 150,940 147,904 (3,036) 153,682 1.8% 2,742 3.9% 5,779 17 Depreciation & Amortization 1,907,147 2.039,519 2,077,860 2,067.330 (10,5301 2,082,000 0.2% 4,140 0.7% 14,670 18 Operating Expense 6,911 ,566 5.108,236 8,765,667 7,001 ,380 (1 '764,287) 11 ,115,964 26.8% 2,350,297 58.8% 4,114,583 19 20 Nonoperating Expense 1,686,200 1,841 ,202 3 ,199,490 2,429,690 (769,800) 3,089,375 -3.4% (11 0,11 5) 27.2% 659,685 21 Capital Expense 3,357,742 1,290,745 2,042,846 892,768 (1 '1 50,0781 2,520 ,963 23.4% 478,11 7 182.4% 1,628,195 22 Total Expense $ 16,178,169 $ 12,449,738 $ 18,276,813 I $ 14,272,420 $ (4,004,393) $ 21,255,865 16.3% s 2,979,052 48.9% s 6,983,445 23 Total Expense- excl Capital Exp $ 12,820,427 $ 11,158,993 $ 16,233,967 I $ 13,379,652 $ (2,854,315) $ 18,734,902 15.4% s 2,500,935 40.0% s 5,355,250 L~ 25 Income - incl Capital Exp Is 32,912,717 I $ 11,012,248 I I $ 19,619,696 I $ 28,043,953 I $ 8,424,2571 I$ 14,978,841 1 1 -23.7% I s (4,640.855) 1 1 -46.6% 1 s (13,065.112) 1 LO 27 Net Income - excl Capital Exp 1 $ 36,270,459 1 $ 12,302,9931 1 $ 21 ,662,542 1 s 28,936,121 1 s 7,274,1791 1 $ 17,499,80411 -19.2% I s (4,162,738) 11 -39.5% 1 s c11 ,436.917) 1 28 29 Labor/OH Financial Statement $ 4,268,810 s 3,948,582 s (320,228) s 4,529,563 6.1% $ 260,753 14.7% s 580,982 30 Labor/OH Capitalized 207,150 240,537 33,387 205,200 -0.9% (1 ,950) -1 4.7% (35,337) 31 Labor/OH Allocated to TDPA 572,466 547,330 (25,136) 604,633 5.6% 32,167 10.5% 57,303 32 Total Labor/OH TOP & TDPA s 5,048,426 s 4,736,449 s (311 ,977) s 5,339,397 5.8% s 290,971 12.7% s 602,948 33 34 Net Income including Capex s 19,619,696 s 28,043,953 s 8 ,424,257 $ 14,978,841 -23.7% s (4,640,855) -46.6% s (1 3,065,112) 35 Depreciation/Amortization 2,077,860 2,067,330 (10,530) 2,082,000 0.2% 4,140 0.7% 14,670 36 Cash Flow Estimate s 21,697,556 $ 30,111,283 $ 8,413,727 $ 17,060,841 -21 .4% $ (4.636.715) -43.3% s (13,050,442)

11 /14/2019 3:27 PM DRAFT 1 Tri-Dam Project 2020 Budget Operations and Administrative Expense

Jan- Oct Nov- Dec 2019 Estimated 2020 Budget vs. Acct No. Category 2019 Budget 2020 Budget Actual Estimated Expense 2019 Estimated

OPERATING EXPENSE 1 Operations 2 53730 Interconnection Expense 3rd Unit 2,000 1,683 337 2,020 2,050 30 3 53740 Powerhouse & Dam utilities 19,500 18,214 8,200 26,414 24,200 -2,214 4 53750 Dam Monitoring I Surveying 5,000 0 7,000 7,000 5,500 -1 ,500 5 53930 Operations Office Supplies 4,150 3,951 790 4,741 4,800 59 6 53940 Powerhouse & Dam Supplies 6,700 6,886 1,377 8,263 7,800 -463 7 53941 Furnishings & Mise Equipment 12,200 380 500 880 17,700 16,820 8 53950 Safety Supplies & Training 59,075 14,117 6,323 20,440 35,815 15,375 9 53970 Site Utilities- (ME,SP,DP only) 31,300 26,102 5,200 31,302 33,400 2,098 10 59750 Small Tools 2,000 966 0 966 2,000 1,034 11 59230 Travel & Conference - Ops 32,000 12,480 0 12,480 35,900 23,420 12 59255 Tuition- Schools and Training - Ops 24,365 13,390 0 13,390 21,700 8,310 13 Total Operations Expense 198,290 98,169 29,727 127,896 190,865 62,969 I<+ 15 Administrative 16 52000 Bank Fees 13,500 11 ,936 2,387 14,323 13,500 -823 17 58338 Resource Management - USFS Beardsley 108,000 99,159 0 99,159 110,000 10,841 18 59210 Office & Administrative 27,600 34,086 5,000 39,086 29,100 -9,986 19 59215 Professional Dues & Subscriptions 25,700 21 ,754 3,799 25,553 27,200 1,647 20 59220 Utilities- Administrative 36,500 30,861 3,000 33,861 43,700 9,839 21 59230 Travel & Conference- Admin & Districts 34,500 7,762 2,000 9,762 30,000 20,238 22 59255 Tuition - Schools and Training - Admin 5,500 529 0 529 5,500 4,971 23 59240 Meals 3,750 2,575 1,300 3,875 5,000 1,125 24 59245 Drugtesting & Physicals 1,500 863 200 1,063 2,000 937 25 59250 Computers and Related 11,700 1,229 2,750 3,979 18,350 14,371 26 59260 Telephone 21,550 22,982 5,200 28,182 26,550 -1 ,632 27 59261 ISO Communications 3,464 4,412 650 5,062 4,100 -962 28 59265 Website & Network Operation & Maint 33,300 36,752 4,200 40,952 60,800 19,848 29 59335 Accounting & Payroll Software 10,046 10,135 1,674 11 ,809 10,550 -1 ,259 30 59640 Streamgaging 28,650 21 ,420 4,820 26,240 29,010 2,770 31 59645 Streamgaging Certification 37,300 30,554 6,289 36,843 37,523 681 32 59328 Reservoir Management 4,500 4,879 500 5,379 15,500 10,121 33 59410 Insurance Premiums 400,000 335,650 80,826 416,476 464,000 47,524 34 59670 USFS Permit Fees 11 ,529 9,607 1,674 11 ,281 11 ,600 319 35 59430 Property and Use Taxes 20,000 46,420 1,000 47,420 31 ,000 -16,420 36 59337 FERC Part 12 Inspections I STID Updates 37,000 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 37 59610 Dam Safety Fees - DWR 194,696 168,170 34,382 202,552 234,300 31 ,748 38 59620 FERC Fees - Admin & Land Use 205,000 143,090 0 143,090 200,000 56,910 39 59650 FERC Headwater Benefit Assessment 90,500 75,417 15,083 90,500 90,500 0 40 59690 EAP, PSP, Security Plan 106,900 52,839 57,849 110,688 84,500 -26,188

DRAFT 2 Tri-Dam Project 2020 Budget Operations and Administrative Expense

Jan- Oct Nov- Dec 2019 Estimated 2020 Budget vs. Acct No. Category 2019 Budget 2020 Budget Actual Estimated Expense 2019 Estimated

41 59310 Legal Fees - General Matters 198,000 247,422 49,484 296,906 473,000 176,094 42 59320 Investments Custody Fees 2,000 1,677 333 2,010 2,100 90 43 59331 Auditor Services 12,268 18,518 0 18,518 12,543 -5,975 44 59932 Special Consultants I Resource Plans 5,000 6,477 1,000 7,477 6,000 -1 ,477 45 59346 License Compliance I Condition Implement 25,000 16,445 12,280 28,725 35,000 6,275 46 59347 Tulloch Shoreline Erosion Plan 120,000 0 0 0 315,000 315,000 47 59348 Tulloch Recreation Plan 25,000 0 0 0 5,000 5,000 48 59349 Tulloch Shoreline Management Plan 22,500 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 49 59350 Mussel Risk Assessment, Inspection & Monitoring 6,100 0 0 0 3,500 3,500 50 59351 Cultural Resources - Tulloch 57,700 21 ,160 28,064 49,224 77,000 27,776 51 59353 Cultural Resources - Beardsley Oonnells 201 ,500 19,946 104,164 124,110 101 ,000 -23,110 52 59345 Shoreline Management Conference 0 20,864 0 20,864 0 -20,864 53 59371 Reliabilty Consulting (NERC/WECC/OSHA) 45,000 0 10,000 10,000 15,000 5,000 54 59373 Labor Negotiator I Consulting I Sal Survey 5,000 0 0 0 27,700 27,700 55 59375 Haz Mat Business Plan 2,500 2,290 0 2,290 2,500 21 0 56 Total Administrative Expense 2,200,253 1,527,881 439,909 1,967,790 2,719,626 751,837 0/ 58 Total Operations & Administrative 2,398,543 1,626,050 469,636 2,095,686 2,910,491 814,805 0::1 60 Labor & Overhead 61 53510 Payroll - Labor 1,245,511 995,439 214,924 1,210,363 1,345,846 135,482 62 53520 Payroll - Overhead & Nonproductive Wages 898,701 888,830 173,756 1,062,586 998,180 -64,406 63 Total Operations & Administrative L/OH 2,144,212 1,884,269 388,680 2,272,949 2,344,025 71,076

DRAFT 3 Tri-Dam Project 2020 Budget Maintenance

Jan- Oct Nov- Dec 2019 Estimated 2020 Budget vs. Acct No. Category 2019 Budget 2020 Budget Actual Estimated Expense 2019 Estimated

1 54230 Maintenance & Repairs to Structures 282,900 27,026 25,082 52,108 192,900 140,792 2 54330 Maintenance & Repairs to Other Facilities 1,908,500 208,478 1,610,736 1,819,214 2,668,500 849,286 3 54430 Maintenance & Repairs to Plant 188,184 159,146 45,000 204,146 172,000 (32,146) 4 54550 Miscellaneous Hydro Expense 34,000 5,356 5,000 10,356 36,000 25,644 5 54460 Electrical & Electronic Expense 221 '150 185 ,1 66 5,000 190,166 67,500 (122,666) 6 54560 Computer Repair & Replacement 9,800 5,276 1,055 6,331 18,800 12,469 7 54570 Radio Repair & Replacement 3,300 181 500 681 2,500 1,819 8 54540 Site Improvements- DP,SP,ME 5,000 5,000 5,000 9 54630 Power Line Repairs 15,000 15,000 15,000 10 54730 Communications & Security System 50,440 39,265 7,853 47,118 95,740 48,622 11 54810 Routine Road Maintenance 154,000 4,033 1,000 5,033 184,000 178,967 12 69101 Major Road Repairs 60,000 370 39,631 40,001 150,000 109,999 13 69500 Tulloch Spillway Road Repairs 900,000 36,897 36,897 2,000,000 1,963,103 14 59230 Travel & Conference 9,700 4,212 4,212 16,000 11 ,788 15 59255 Schools & Training 20,150 17,895 17,895 35,050 17,155 16 53930 Maintenance Office Supplies 1,500 635 500 1 '135 1,500 365 17 53950 Safety Supplies & Related 19,000 8,350 1,670 10,020 24,000 13,980 18 59328 Reservoir Management 18,500 8,159 1,632 9,791 20,000 10,209 19 59730 Rolling Stock Maintenance & Repair 75,000 74,599 16,704 91 ,303 85,000 (6,303) 20 59740 Shop Supplies 20,000 18,626 3,725 22,351 20,000 (2,351) 21 59750 Small Tools 12,000 17,475 500 17,975 20,000 2,025 22 59755 Miscellaneous Equipment 14,000 45 45 15,600 15,555 23 59760 Di sposal Fees 6,000 3,847 769 4,616 6,000 1,384 24 59770 Fuel and Fuel tax 95,000 77,077 15,415 92,492 105,000 12,508 25 59790 Equipment Operation & Maintenance 15,200 5,478 1,096 6,574 13,700 7,126 26 TOTAL MAINTENANCE EXPENSE 4,138,324 870,695 1,819,766 2,690,461 5,969,790 3,279,329 27 28 LABOR & OVERHEAD 29 53510 Payroll - Labor 1,118,559 623,078 139,528 762,606 1,134,225 371 ,619 30 53520 Payroll - Overhead & Nonproductive Wages 820,261 558,105 108,225 666,330 858,105 191,775 31 TOTAL LABOR & OVERHEAD 1,938,820 1,181,183 247,753 1,428,936 1,992,330 563,394

DRAFT 4 Tri-Dam Project 2020 Budget Goodwin Dam

Jan- Oct Nov- Dec 2019 Estimated 2020 Budget vs. Acct No. Category 2019 Budget 2020 Budget Actual Estimated Expense 2019 Estimated

OPERATIONS 2 53940 Dam Supplies 300 0 0 0 300 300 3 53970 Utilities 3,000 2,512 502 3,014 3,100 86 4 GOODWIN OPERATIONS EXPENSE 3,300 2,512 502 3,014 3,400 386 0 6 MAINTENANCE 7 54330 Maintenance & Repairs to Facilities 43,550 60,402 0 60,402 4,000 -56,402 8 54330 Adjustments to 54330- Not SEWD 0 -6,698 0 -6,698 0 6,698 9 54560 Microwave I Computer Repair & Replacement 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 10 54730 Communications & Security System 2,000 114 0 11 4 11 ,000 10,886 11 59755 Equipment Rental from Tri-Dam Project 2,400 2,340 400 2,740 2,400 -340 12 GOODWIN MAINTENANCE EXPENSE 49,950 56,158 400 56,558 19,400 -37,158

14'" ADMINISTRATION 15 59310 Legal Fees 7,500 0 0 0 5,000 5,000 16 59331 Auditing Services 2,420 2,420 0 2,420 2,475 55 17 59410 Insurance Premiums 7,500 6,537 1,477 8,014 8,700 686 18 59610 Dam Safety Fees 20,870 23,850 0 23,850 26,235 2,385 59690 EAP - Goodwin Inundation Map 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 19 59640 Streamgaging 44,500 32, 130 7,230 39,360 43,515 4,155 20 59645 Streamgaging Certification - USGS 14,900 12,179 2,508 14,687 14,957 271 21 GOODWIN ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE 97,690 77,116 11 ,215 88,331 130,882 42,551 LL 23 TOTAL OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE & ADMIN 150,940 135,786 12,1 17 147,904 153,682 5,779 L"+ 25 LABOR & OVERHEAD 26 53510 Payroll Labor- Operations & Administration 101 ,418 88,209 19,045 107,254 105,475 -1 ,779 27 53510 Payroll Labor - Maintenance 12,568 37,822 1,000 38,822 13,071 -25,751 28 53520 Payroll Overhead - Operations & Administration 62,058 36,845 32,796 69,642 64,540 -5,101 29 53520 Payroll Overhead - Maintenance 9,733 17,333 13,646 30,980 10,122 -20,857 30 TOTAL LABOR & OVERHEAD 185,777 180,209 66,488 246,697 193,208 -53,489 31 32 TOTAL GOODWIN EXPENSE 336,717 315,995 78,605 394,601 346,890 -47,710 36 37 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 38 DVR replacement 9,500 0 0 0 9,500 9,500 39 Microwave link upgrade 0 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 40 Upgrade SCADA RTU I RTAC 16,200 0 0 0 12,000 12,000 41 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 25,700 0 0 0 46,500 46,500

5 DRAFT Tri-Dam Project 2020 Budget Nonoperating Expense

Jan- Oct Nov- Dec 2019 Estimated 2020 Budget vs. Acct No. Category 2019 Budget 2020 Budget Actual Estimated Expense 2019 Estimated

NONOPERATING EXPENSE 1 59370 Life Cycle Monitoring 550,000 400,969 149,031 550,000 550,000 0 2 59358 Data Analysis I Publications 100,000 89,575 10,425 100,000 100,000 0 3 59377 Fish Studies Legal Support I Consulting 100,000 69,1 99 30,801 100,000 100,000 0 4 59368 Lower River Non-native Investigation 1,000,000 788,504 11 ,496 800,000 1,000,000 200,000 5 59369 Caswell Rotary Screw Trap 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 59367 Legal - USSR I SWRCB I Water Issues 360,000 498,737 100,000 598,737 360,000 -238,737 7 59339 Strategic Communications (Save-the-Stan) 60,000 12,476 3,000 15,476 50,000 34,524 8 59510 Stanislaus River Basin Plan - Legal 36,000 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 9 59515 Stanislaus River Basin Plan 738,490 57,447 25,000 82,447 685,000 602,553 10 59810 Washington DC Advocacy & PR 121 ,000 91,195 30,000 121 ' 195 121 ,000 -195 11 59710 District Water Rights - Legal 120,000 19,460 15,000 34,460 60,000 25,540 12 59615 Water Rights Fees- SWRCB 14,000 0 27,375 27,375 27,375 0 13 Total Nonoperating Expense 3,199,490 2,027,562 402,128 2,429,690 3,089,375 659,685

DRAFT 6 Tri-Dam Project Capital Expenditures Budget 2020 In ESTIMATED TRI-DAM TOTAL EXPENDITURE LOCATION Progress? COST LABOR COST EXPENDITURE Tulloch Recreation Site Tulloch Reservoir Yes 790,000 30,000 820,000 2020 Kenworth T800 snowplow I dump truck Strawberry NA 248,000 - 248,000 1 ton maintenance truck with utility bed & lift gate (#1 ) -ordered in 20 19 Strawberry NA 58,063 - 58,063 1 ton maintenance truck with utility bed & lift gate (#2) Strawberry NA 62,000 - 62,000 1 ton maintenance truck with utility bed & lift gate (#3) Strawberry NA 62,000 - 62,000 Replace DVRs (10 @ $9.500) various, including Goodwin Dam No 95,000 19,500 114,500 New water tank Beardsley Powerhouse No 90,000 48,000 138,000 300kW diesel generator Beardsley Powerhouse No 75,000 18,000 93,000 300kW diesel generator - purchased in 2019, install in 2020 Tulloch Powerhouse Yes 5,000 18,000 23,000 112 ton operations truck (#1) Strawberry NA 35,000 - 35,000 112 ton operations truck (#2) Strawberry NA 35,000 - 35,000 HMI touch screens for exciters Tulloch 1 & 2 No 66,000 - 66,000 Skimmer gate actuator Tulloch Dam No 55,000 9,000 64,000 314 ton maintenance truck & shell Strawberry NA 58,000 - 58,000 Strawberry Peak microwave link to Strawberry Admin upgrade Strawberry Peak No 50,000 3,000 53,000 Strawberry Peak microwave link to ME upgrade Strawberry Peak No 42,000 6,000 48,000 Strawberry Peak microwave link to DPH upgrade Strawberry Peak No 42,000 3,000 45,000 Strawberry Peak microwave link to BPH upgrade Strawberry Peak No 42,000 3,000 45,000 Mt. Elizabeth microwave link to DP upgrade Mt. Elizabeth No 42,000 6,000 48,000 Mt. Elizabeth microwave link to TPH upgrade Mt. Elizabeth No 42,000 3,000 45,000 Masticating head for excavator Strawberry NA 36,000 - 36,000 New required ISO metering Beardsley Powerhouse No 35,000 - 35,000 New required ISO metering Tulloch Powerhouse No 35,000 - 35,000 Telemetry upgrade (Sierra Controls I Talley Comm project) various locations Yes 30,000 12,000 42,000 Upgrade C02 fire suppression system Tulloch Powerhouse Units 1&2 No 30,000 4,500 34,500 Microwave link to TPH upgrade Goodwin Dam No 25,000 3,000 28,000 License compliance tracking software Admin NA 25,000 - 25,000 New repeater- ordered in 2019 Mt. Elizabeth Yes 20,000 - 20,000 50kW propane generator- purchased in 2019, install in 2020 Mt. Elizabeth Yes 1,000 4,500 5,500 Iron worker machine Beardsley Service Center NA 15,000 - 15,000 Upgrade C02 fire suppression system Donnells Powerhouse No 15,000 2,250 17,250 Upgrade C02 fire suppression system Beardsley Powerhouse No 15,000 2,250 17,250 Upgrade SCADA RTU I RTAC Goodwin Dam No 12,000 4,200 16,200 Waveguide & antenna test equipment Strawberry NA 9,500 - 9,500 Lighted flag pole and U.S. flag Strawberry No 7,000 3,000 10,000 GPS time server for SCADA Operations Center No 6,200 3,000 9,200 Cold saw Beardsley Service Center NA 5,000 - 5,000 2,315,763 205,200 2,520,963

DRAFT 7 Tri-Dam Project 2020 Budget

Estimated Budget Tri-Dam Expense Trend I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 I 2015 I 2016 I 2017 I 2018 J 2019 I 2020 2 Labor & Overhead, ex Goodwin UOH 2,740,399 2,941,937 2,923,160 2,858,974 3, 334,930 4,035,977 4,022,845 3,701 ,885 4,336,355 3 Other Operating Costs 2,436,879 4,527,260 2,240,479 3,221,522 2,175 ,196 4,916,345 2,972,369 4,786,147 8,880,281 4 Non-Operating Costs, incl Goodwin UOH 1,011 ,876 1,350,630 1,209,744 1,722,181 1,506,509 1,960,959 2,124,259 2,824,291 3,436,265 5 Shell Fees 898,975 1,005,860 30 ------6 Depreciation 1,658,328 1,889,624 1,918,103 1,923,981 2,491 ,781 1, 907,147 2, 039,519 2,067,330 2,082,000 7 Total Expense 8,746,457 11 ,715,311 8,291 ,516 9,726,659 9, 508,41 6 12,820,427 11,158,993 13,379,652 18,734,902 8 Total Expense excluding Depreciation 7,088,129 9,825,687 6,373,413 7,802,678 7,016,635 10,913,280 9,11 9,474 11 ,312,322 16,652,902 9 Percentage Increase vs. Prior Year -4.6% 38.6% -35.1% 22.4% -10.1% 55.5% -16.4% 3.7% 47.2% 10 Compound Annual Growth Rate Since 201 2 0.0% 38.6% -5.2% 3.3% -0.3% 9.0% 4.3% 6.9% 11.3% 11 Total Expense excl Depreciation & Shell 6, 189,154 8,819,827 6,373,383 7,802,678 7,016,635 10,913,280 9,119,474 11,312,322 16,652,902 12 Percentage Increase vs. Prior Year -2.0% 42.5% -27.7% 22.4% -10.1% 55.5% -16.4% 3.7% 47.2% 13 Compound Annual Growth Rate Since 2012 0.0% 42.5% 1.5% 8.0% 3.2% 12.0% 6.7% 9.0% 13.2% 14 15 Nonoperating Costs 16 Fishbio- Outmigration & Life Cycle Monitoring 417,367 601 ,288 531 ,352 527,159 554,701 644,600 571,390 550,000 550,000 17 Fishbio- O.mykiss Census 75,432 ------18 Fishbio - Data Analysis I Publications - - - 100,000 52,954 81 ,046 98,668 100,000 100,000 20 Fishbio - Legal Support I Consulting 36,251 99,658 101,773 90,382 71,562 112,156 39,658 100,000 100,000 21 Fishbio - Lower River Non-native Investigation - - - - - 318,523 397,762 800,000 1,000,000 22 Geomorphologist - 164,817 17,030 3,388 - - - - - 23 OLP - USBR I SWRCB I Water Issues 193,696 201 ,298 242,250 512,730 416,114 480,387 451 ,188 598,737 360,000 24 Public Relations Consulting I Districts 75 - - 201,781 82,211 35,700 20,800 15,476 50,000 25 Stanisla us River Basin Plan ------127,644 82,447 721,000 26 Washington DC Advocacy ------70,461 121 ,195 121,000 27 SWRCB Water Rights Fees & Legal 13,525 13,788 14,788 14,788 13,788 13,788 63,632 61,835 87,375 28 Sub Total 736,346 1,080,849 907,193 1,450,228 1,191,330 1,686,200 1,841,202 2,429,690 3,089,375 29 Total Goodwin Expenses 275,530 269,781 302,551 271,953 315,179 274,759 283,057 394,601 346,890 30 Total Non-Operating Costs 1,011 ,876 1,350,630 1,209,744 1,722 ,181 1,506,509 1,960,959 2,124,259 2,824,291 3,436,265 31 32 Total Operating Revenue 20,489,380 22,500,866 15,460,554 15,302,362 33,800,302 48,458,414 21,651 ,767 38,919,079 35,441,295 33 34 Core Operating Costs 35 Labor & Labor-Related Overhead 2,740,399 2,941 ,937 2,923,160 2,858,974 3,334,930 4,035,977 4,022,845 3,701,885 4,336,355 36 Other Core Operating Costs 2,436,879 4,527,260 2,240,479 3, 221,522 2,175,196 4,916,345 2,972,369 4,786,147 8,880,281 37 Total Core Operating Costs 5,177,278 7,469,197 5,163,639 6,080,496 5,510, 126 8,952,321 6,995,215 8,488,032 13,216,636 38 Operating Costs, % of Operating Revenue 25.3% 33.2% 33.4% 39.7% 16.3% 18.5% 32.3% 21 .8% 37.3% 39 40 Other Operating Costs 41 Shell Service Fees 898,975 1,005,860 30 ------42 Depreciation 1,658,328 1,889,624 1,918,103 1,923,981 2,491 ,781 1,907,147 2,039,519 2,067,330 2,082,000 43 Total Operating Costs 7,734,581 10,364,681 7,081 ,772 8,004,477 8,001,907 10,859,468 9,034,734 10,555,362 15,298,636 44 45 Total Operating & Nonoperating Costs 8,746,457 11,715,311 8,291,516 9,726,659 9,508,416 12,820,427 11 ,158,993 13,379,652 18,734,902 46

DRAFT 8 Tri-Dam Expense Trend 2012-2020 $20,000,000

$18,000,000 - 2,082,000 - $16,000,000 f---

$14,000,000 f----

2,067,330 8,880,28,L-- $12,000,000 1,907,14/ - 1,889,624 - $10,000,000 ~ , 039 , 51~ l f--- 1,005,860 I - 1,923,981 4,786,147 2.491,781, 1,916,345 $8,000,000 ,658,328 I '------2,972,369 I I 1,918,103 I - 898,975 4,527,260 30 3,221,52.f j $6,000,000 ---f 2,175,19o 4,336,355 I ----- 2,436,879 I 4,022,845 3 , 701,8~1 $4,000,000 C· '~ · ": I 4,035,977 - 1 I 2,858,974 3,334,930 2,941,937 2,923,160 2,740,399 I _t--- $2,000,000 - I I 3,436,26 2,824,291 ~2,124,259I 1,722,181 1,960,959 1,350,630 1,209,744 1.506,51 1,011,876 j $0 I I 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Non-Operating Cost s, incl Goodwin l / OH Labor & Overhead, ex Goodw in l / OH Other Operating Costs Shell Fees Depreciation

DRAFT 9 Tri-Dam Project Organization Chart- 2020

License Compliance General Manager Coordinator

Finance & Administrative Operations Supervisor Maintenance Supervisor Manager

I / _ l 1 Admin. & Finance Assistant [ Technician Crew Leader J ( Maintenance Lea d r--- I Roving Operator I Purchasing Clerk l ( Technician ) c Electrician

[~..... ___R_ o_v_ing Operator =-:=J ( Elect. Machinist I J L L Relief Operat~ ~ L Tech. Apprentice Hydro Mechanic

Equip. Operator

Shift Operator Mechanic

L Sh ift _o_p_er_a..,.to_r___ _ Welder

( Laborer )

( Laborer ) Temp. Laborer 2020ACWA

MEMBERSHIP DUES Bringing Water Together ·19 OCT 3 I PH 2: n

Date: September 26, 2019 Tri·Dam Project

P.O. Box 1158

Pinecrest, CA 95364

2020 Annual Agency Dues

Total Amount Due

Thank you for your continued support with ACWA. Please remit payment by January 31, 2020.

******MEMBERSHIP DUES*******MEMBERSHIP DUES********MEMBERSHIP DUES*******

SACRMviENTO 910 K Street, Suite100, Sacramento, CA 95814 • (916) 441-4545 WASHINGTON, D.C. 400 North Capitol Street NW, Suite 357, Washington, DC 20001• (202) 434-4760 Association of California Water Agencies 2020 Member Dues Calculation

Date: September 26, 2019 Name: Tri-Dam Project

(1) Operating Expenses

(2) All Other Expenses $9,282,683.00

(3) Total Expenses $9,282,683.00

«

(4) Purchased Power

(5) Water Purchases

(6) Groundwater Replenishment

(7) Depreciation $2,039,519.00

(8) Fixed Assets

(9) Total Adjusted Expenses $7,243,164.00

«

(10) Pumping

(11) Total Expenses Adjusted For Pumping $7,243,164.00

(12) Line 11 times 2 $14,486,328.00

(13) Dues O&M (lessor of line 9 or 12) $7,243,164.00

DUES AMOUNT t·~.:::~,~~;:~.~::·:~:··:J ***THIS IS NOT A BILL- PLEASE DO NOT PAY FROM THIS WORKSHEET*** 2019 IBEW

PERFORMANCE

RECOGNITION . BOARD AGENDA REPORT

Date: November 21, 2019 Staff: Jeff Shields

2019 IBEW Performance Recognition

Background Summary: Article 21.2 of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the IBEW and Tri-Dam provides that represented employees of the Project be entitled to a wage bonus up to $32,000 per year based on not exceeding a cumulative number of hours for unplanned or forced outages.

The basis of the plan establishes a threshold of 200 hours or less for unplanned outages per year. The time period is December 1 through November 30. If unplanned outages do not exceed 200 hours then an incentive bonus payment of $32,000 is divided equally amongst the eligible, represented employees.

If unplanned outages exceed 200 hours, the bonus is reduced by 10% for each 24-hour period of outage time exceeding the 200-hour threshold. Therefore, if an outage or combination of outages exceeds 8.3 days the bonus is reduced by 10% for each 24-hour period. The cumulative hourly amount of unplanned outages in the period of December 1, 2018 through November 4, 2019 is as follows:

2019 2017 Donnells Powerhouse: 3.03 hours 15.25 hours Beardsley Powerhouse: 12.51 hours 4.28 hours Tulloch Powerhouse: .00 hours .00 hours Southern Powerhouse: 1.56 hours 36.38 hours

Total Unplanned outage time: 17.50 hours 56.31 hours

The total unplanned outage hours are less than the threshold of 200 hours and the entire bonus of $32,000 is payable. A bonus payment of $1,882.35 will be made to each of the 17 eligible represented employees. Incentive Bonus payments were made in 2011 - 2017 and were not made in 2009, 2010 and 2018 due to the Donnells Powerhouse generator failure and the Donnells thrust bearing failure. WASHINGTON DC

ACTIVITIES 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW VNF Seventh Floor Washington , DC 20007 Solutions~ (202) 298-1800 Phone I (202) 338-241 6 Fax MEMORANDUM

TO: Tri-Dam Project FROM: Jason Larrabee DATE: November 4, 2019 RE: October Monthly Report 2019

Please find a summary of activities and news below. If you have any questions regarding the information, please contact me directly at [email protected] or 202-298-1877.

Meetings and Events Attended a Westem Caucus Foundation going away party for Jeff Small, fmmally executive director for the House Westem Caucus, and who is heading to the Department of the Interior as a political appointee. I had in-person meetings with GMs Knell and Rietkerk during a trip to the area. I assisted in the drafting of a letter on Lake Tulloch from TriDam regarding a meeting on lake operations and held conversations with Rep. McClintock staff and Army Corps of Engineers staff on Lake Tulloch. I also worked with Susan Larson to better understand the permitting issues of docks on the lake. Had conversations with Austin Ewell, Interim Executive Director, Water Blueprint for the San Joaquin Valley, regarding the proposal the group has created for Governor Newsom's Water Resilience Portfolio and what he envisions for next steps. Reviewed and researched the biological opinions released by the Bureau of Reclamation, US Fish & Wildlife Service and NOAA Fisheries for the Coordinated Operations on the Long Term Operations for the Central Valley Project and State Water Project and their reference to the Stanislaus River I was asked to assist with ideas for the development of a westem water bill to be introduced by Rep. McClintock which included items locking in provisions of the 2016 WIIN Act, pennit streamlining, storage funding, complying with ESA changes and dealing with drought. The House Democrats have been working on their own westem water bill, but they've not released any specific details. It is highly anticipated it will be a compilation of the many bills Reps. Huffman, Costa, Harder and Cox have introduced tllis year. I held a conference call with House Natural Resources committee staff and FishBio on the hlstory and status of predator research on the Stanislaus River.

IMPEACHMENT The long impeachment "inquiry" of President Trump started by House Democrats in September became an official "investigation" when the House voted on October 31 51 on an impeachment investigation resolution, which would fmmalize the House's probe into President Donald Trump by explicitly laying out committees' next steps. The resolution, H. Res. 660, which spells out certain powers for congressional committees and the White House in future impeachment hearings, is primarily procedural. Republicans have criticized the Democrats as has having conducted an illegitimate impeach inquiry absent due process, faimess or transparency and full of tainted evidence. Senate Republicans, led by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), have introduced their own resolution in protest of the House proceedings and process. All expectations in D.C. are the House will impeach President Trump and the Senate will not convict, thus making the process an exercise in political posturing for each party's base prior to the 2020 election season.

APPROPRIATIONS STATUS 5 On October 31 \ senators managed to pass their first fiscal 2020 spending bills of the year, H.R. 3055, including Ag, CJS, Interior-EPA and Mil Con-VA agency funding. However, Democrats in the upper chamber tanked a test vote on the second - and more controversial - spending package. In a 51 -41 vote, the chamber rejected the first procedural motion, which needed 60 votes of support. The four-bill package, H.R. 2740, would fund the military and the biggest chunk of domestic programs, including the Energy-Water spending measure for fiscal 2020. Democrats argue Republicans have set unreasonably low totals for measures in the second 5 minibus. Keep in mind: The House is heading out for a week-long recess starting Nov. 1 \ leaving behind a dozen fi scal 2020 funding bills as the government heads toward a Nov. 21 deadline.

FISH ACT Rep. Huffman inh·oduced the "Salmon Focused Investments in Sustainable Habitats (FISH) Act" on October 181h which would create a federal grant program to protect wild salmon habitats across the country. The bill would require NOAA and the Fish and Wildlife Service to designate areas that meet certain criteria as salmon conservation areas, with a separate marker of Salmon Stronghold for the most robust zones. The scientifically identified areas would then be eligible for conservation and restoration funding. The measure would also allow tribes, states, nongovernmental organizations and the public to nominate areas for protection.

REP. HARDER ASKS PANEL TO KEEP FARMERS IN MIND On Oct 22nd, asked the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis to keep central valley farmers in mind as the panel considers recommendations to Congress for combating climate change. In a letter to committee leaders, Harder called for specific policy ideas like developing climate-friendly agri-technology. The Select Committee has no legislative authority and is focused on discussing policies for addressing a changing climate.

NEW BIOPS ON ROC ON L TO RELEASED 5 On October 21 \ the US Fish & Wildlife Service, Bureau of Reclamation and NOAA Fisheries announced the completion of the biological opinions on the Coordinated Operations on the Long Term Operations (ROC on LTO) of the Central Valley Project and California State Water Project. The regulatory agencies found the operations will not jeopardize threatened or endangered species or adversely modify their designated critical habitat. The opinions and relevant documentation can be found at https://www.fws.gov/sfbaydelta/cvp-swp/index.htm Reps. Josh Harder (CA-10), John Gararnendi (CA-03), Jim Costa (CA-1 6), and TJ Cox (CA-21) and U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) released a cautious statement on the updated biological opinions for federally protected fish species and coordinated operations of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project, focusing on science, the voluntary agreement process and securing federal funding for the CVP. You can read the release by clicking here.

ENVIROS HAIL SETTLEMENT FORCING EPA TO STUDY CHEMICALS A settlement filed on October 23nd, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, sets deadlines for a host of chemicals EPA must analyze regarding the effects of eight widely used pesticides and other chemicals on plants and animals. It sets finn deadlines for EPA to conduct biological evaluations under the Endangered Species Act for a series of herbicides, rat poisons and pesticides, including ah·azine, the second-most-used pesticide in Ametica. Other substances covered are pesticides carbaryl, methomyl and simazine. Rodenticides included in the settlement are bromadiolone, warfarin, zinc phosphide and the widely used brodifacoum. The deadlines for the review begin in 2021 and run through 2024, depending on the chemical, and a 2021 deadline for the atrazine analysis.

WOTUS REPEAL, AND LAWSUITS, LAND The public comment period regarding the EPA's final WOTUS repeal rule October 21 st, allowing the rule to be published in the Federal Register on October 22°d. The repeal is seen as the point where Democratic-led states and enviromnental advocates to file a wave oflawsuits against the repeal. The repeal overtums the Obama-eta WOTUS rule that cemented Clean Water Act protections for streams and wetlands, which drew criticism from ag and other industries that claimed it was an overreach. The Trump administration is also working on a follow-up rule that would replace the regulation with a new, narrower definition of the waterways that warrant federal protection. EPA ROLLS OUT PESTICIDE ZONE RULE 11 On Oct. 24t , the EPA proposed a rule that would alter pesticide no-spray buffer zones around fields and orchards. The agency said that changes to the Agricultural Worker Protection Standards are intended to "simplify" requirements for the outdoor area smmunding pesticide equipment. The current rules stipulate that the so-called Application Exclusion Zone, AEZ, can range from anywhere between 25 and 100 feet from the site of application and can reach beyond a fann's property line. EPA wants to shrink those exclusion zones by ordering that enforcement of the AEZ can't extend outside of property boundaries. The EPA will take public cormnent on the proposal for 90 days and you can read the EPA release here. STAFF

REPORTS

. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT TRI-DAM PROJECT of the Oakdale & South San Joaquin Irrigation Districts Board of Directors Meeting November 21, 2019

Project Activities

• Jarom Zimmerman is scheduled to report for work on December 2, 2019. His pre-employment physical and background check have been completed and have been placed in his employee file. The Board previously authorized an annual employee recognition dinner so we scheduled that to coincide with Jaroms arrival. Because of the proximity to the holidays it was difficult to find a location and date in the local area but we landed on December 51h at The Peppery in Sonora. I know most of the SSJID and OlD Board and General Managers will be at ACWA, but if you do want to attend please let me know. In addition to recognizing Years of Service and the outstanding workers safety record at Tri-Dam (1525 days without a lost time incident until November 12th), I plan to express my appreciation for the support given me over the past five months and for the effort by staff to get much catch-up work accomplished. Also, this will be the first opportunity to introduce Jarom and his wife to the entire staff at Tri-Dam.

• On Veteran's Day, November 11th, one of our employees was working and got stung by a bee or wasp on his right eyelid. Employee didn't seek immediate assistance but shortly afterwards his eye began swelling and eventually had swollen shut. He went home after his shift and the swelling spread to his temple and left eye. At approximately 3AM the employee sought medical attention at Prompt Care and had to take the following day off. The good news is the employee was given an EpiPen should he have a similar incident in the future, and the swelling has started to recede. The bad news is we have to reset the "Lost Time Accident/Injury" timer on the building to zero days. The timer reported 1525 days at the time of this incident.

• Ritchie Brothers conducts an online auction every Thursday to dispose of heavy equipment. Tri-Dam has listed the three pieces of heavy equipment that the Board approved last year to be disposed of as surplus. The equipment has been inspected by Ritchie Brothers and all documentation has been received as necessary to sell the equipment. The equipment will be sold on Thursday, November 21, 2019.

• Our FERC license requires an Emergency Action Plan (EAP) be maintained and mandates a "Tabletop and Functional Exercise" which we conducted on October 29, 2019 at Black Oak Conference Center. FERC attended as observers. The focus was a mock series of events that led to a cataclysmic dam failure at Tulloch Dam. We have not received the final report from FERC. Unfortunately, the event was lightly attended by several local agencies due to the fact that it occurred at the same time PG&E had implemented a planned power outage (PSPS). Tri-Dam staff did a great job working through the exercise which started at 8AM and concluded at 3PM. CHP, USFS, San Joaquin OES, and PG&E were a few of the agencies in attendance. Peter Rietkerk also attended and participated in the exercise. I believe this is an extremely valuable exercise and suggest it be mandatory for all Tri-Dam staff in the future. • A fire broke out below Donnells Dam on November 2nd and burned approximately five acres before it was contained and extinguished by CDF, including aircraft and ground crews. II is reported that a lone sportsman had fallen into the river below the dam and started a small fire to dry off and stay warm. The fire got away from him but was quickly reported and contained.

1 • Wayne Edwards, our consulting Chief Dam Safety Engineer, spent the day on October 30 h with various staff reviewing our Dam Safety Plan as required by our FERC license and the Office of Dam Safety.

• The afternoon of October 3Q1h was devoted to management staff working as a team on the 2020 budget. The Board will have an opportunity to review and, if satisfied, approve the budget at the November 21st meeting.

• We received invoices from the SWRCB for Tri-Dam's annual Water Rights. These fees are based on the installed capacity of the three powerhouses. Since 20131he fees were $13,787.50 annually. This year they increased to $27,375. According to the SWRCB website, the calculation is correct although they don't give a rationale for such enormous increases.

• There will not be an Advisory Meeting in December. Tri·Dam Project Meeting

Date: November 21, 2019 To: Board of Directors From: Troy Hammerbeck Re: Maintenance Report

Tulloch • Tree garden maintenance.

Beardsley • Annual maintenance on power house in progress. • Replace boards on A-Bay Dam. • Kept A-Bay gate valve grizzly clear of debris while at low lake level. • Raked up dead vegetation along shore line of A-Bay. • Built grout pipes for A-Bay dam repairs. • Assisted Operations with opening spill gates. • Attended A-Bay Dam meetings.

Donnells • Assisted Operations with opening spill gates. • Winterized cottage at Dam.

Sandbar • Annual maintenance on power house in progress.

Misc. • Service vehicles and equipment. • Continue working on 2020 budget. Tri-Dam Project Meeting

Date: November 21 , 2019 To: Board of Directors From: Brian Belitz Re: Operations Report

Reservoir Data (A/F)

Facility Storage Storage Change Acre-Feet Used Spill/Bypass

Donnells 34,998 -7,085 13,449 1,474

Beardsley 62,318 2,101 6,635 4,020

Tulloch 56,127 -5,944 72,623 0

New Melones 1,998,687 -34,465 67,054 0

Operations Report

Donnells generator came offline due to PG&E PSPS line outages on 10/9, 10/26- 10/30. (Online - 619 hours, 58 minutes)

Beardsley generator came offline for annual maintenance beginning 10/6. (Online- 126 hours, 3 minutes)

Sandbar generator came offline for annual maintenance beginning 10/6. (Online- 126 hours, 2 minutes)

Tulloch generators stayed online the entire month of October. (Online - Unit 1 = 457 hours, 21 minutes, Unit 2 = 458 hours, 32 minutes, Unit 3 = 744 hours, 0 minutes).

New Melones Inflow: The total inflow to New Melones as of October 31 was 37,591 A/F.

District Usage: Total District usage for the water year 2019/20 through October 31 was approximately 24,594 A/F.

Precipitation: Total precipitation for October was 0.00 inches.

Other Activities: • Facilitated DSOD Donnells dam inspection to witness low-level outlet operation on 10/9. • Facilitated Tulloch dam tour for EAP participants and attended EAP facilitator training. • Submitted quarterly data for GADS, CEC-1304 and WECC compliance. • Spill gates opened at DDM on 10/30 and BDM on 10/31 per FERC compliance. Tri-Dam Project Meeting Date: November 21, 2019 To: Board of Directors From: Brian Belitz Re: Safety and Environmental Report

SAFETY: • Participated in Risk Control Audit with Glatfelter Insurance Group . • Attended Tri-Dam Project EAP Tabletop and Functional Exercise on 9/29 . Updated Safety Training Matrix

SAFETY DATA MONTHLY TOTALS YTD/TOTALS 12 MONTH ROLLING AVERAGE

Recordable Injury Rate 0 0.00 0.00 Recordable Injuries 0 0 0 Days Worked Since Last Recordable Injury 31 1,508 N/A Day Worked Without a Lost Time Accident 31 1,513 N/A Employee Hours Worked (Plant+ Temp) 6,080.00 45,514.67 . 56,243.04 Number of Safety Events Reported 0 0 N/A % of Site-Specific Training Completed 13.04% 64.85% N/A

ENVIRONMENTAL: • Removed used antifreeze, used oil and used floor sweep from Strawberry Office site. • Revised used oil collection site at TPH Conducted weekly SPCC and monthly Universal Waste inspections at all sites.

YTD ENVIRONMENTAL DATA MONTH LIMIT/GOAL TOT/AVG Notice of Violation (NOVs) 0 0 0 Deviation from Regulatory Requirements 0 0 0 Environmental Incidents 0 0 0 BEARDSLEY PRECIPITATION

YEAR JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE TOTAL ------·---·------·------...... ------·----

1958-59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.40 1.39 1.40 1.04 0.00 11.23 1959-60 0.00 0.03 3.09 0.00 0.00 1.92 5.74 8.38 4.68 2.45 0.35 0.00 26.64 1960-61 0.05 0.00 0.44 0.63 5.33 2.43 1.60 3.04 4.96 1.49 1.84 0.29 22.10 1961-62 0.21 1.12 0.77 0.70 3.39 2.98 2.04 15.32 6.13 1.12 1.04 0.02 34.84 1962-63 0.30 0.16 0.35 2.98 1.05 2.66 5.91 8.37 6.08 8.24 3.70 0.74 40.54 1963-64 0.00 0.44 0.59 2.63 7.81 0.81 5.84 0.21 3.02 2.01 2.44 1.64 27.44 1964-65 0.00 0.00 0.34 2.08 7.40 17.93 5.90 1.34 2.44 5.27 0.32 0.29 43.31 1965-66 0.00 1.47 0.60 0.47 12.38 4.59 1.68 2.33 1.00 2.39 0.43 0.10 27.44 1966-67 0.13 0.00 0.28 0.00 7.55 8.48 8.77 0.67 10.02 10.25 2.04 1.05 49.24 1967-68 0.00 0.39 0.90 0.54 2.47 3.35 4.94 4.81 3.48 0.73 1.44 0.02 23.07 1968-69 0.10 0.65 0.00 2.12 6.22 8.28 19.45 8.35 1.88 3.39 0.21 0.39 51.04 1969-70 0.00 0.00 0.55 3.41 2.98 6.46 17.06 3.11 3.43 2.50 0.00 3.17 42.67 1970-71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 10.71 8.44 2.83 1.16 4.87 1.49 1.80 0.77 32.98 1971-72 0.00 0.02 0.29 1.22 6.22 10.31 2.39 2.78 1.01 4.03 0.10 1.62 29.99 1972-73 0.00 0.58 0.17 1.85 6.27 5.57 12.08 12.06 5.31 1.11 0.72 0.74 46.46 1973-74 0.05 0.18 0.07 3.65 9.88 9.10 5.08 1.84 8.18 5.15 0.02 0.07 43.27 1974-75 2.57 0.10 0.00 2.82 2.38 4.95 4.25 10.16 9.90 5.41 0.84 0.63 44.01 1975-76 0.03 2.02 0.15 6.75 2.04 0.74 0.49 3.03 2.66 2.42 0.91 0.05 21.29 1976-77 0.10 2.43 1.00 0.93 1.54 0.24 2.50 2.68 2.06 0.25 4.65 0.38 18.76 RECORD LOW 1977-78 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.24 4.76 9.72 10.85 8.31 8.67 7.97 0.19 0.23 51.52 1978-79 0.08 0.00 3.98 0.07 3.17 4.43 8.45 7.60 6.05 1.86 2.88 0.02 38.59 1979-80 0.17 0.03 0.00 4.66 4.63 5.22 14.62 13.03 3.61 3.09 4.33 0.77 54.16 1980-81 0.43 0.02 0.03 0.71 0.58 3.04 8.05 2.69 6.26 1.67 1.42 0.00 24.90 1981-82 0.06 0.00 0.15 5.27 8.76 8.39 6.08 8.08 11.23 8.19 0.12 1.34 57.67 1982-83 0.03 0.02 4.02 8.78 11.30 7.32 10.83 14.34 12.86 6.29 0.74 0.12 76.65 RECORD HIGH 1983-84 0.01 0.09 3.86 1.35 16.44 12.75 0.27 5.51 3.56 2.70 0.84 1.31 48.69 1984-85 0.00 0.05 0.73 3.97 10.28 2.58 1.52 3.13 5.84 0.86 0.07 0.28 29.31 1985-86 0.30 0.12 2.64 3.09 7.71 4.52 4.70 21.98 8.43 2.37 1.58 0.00 57.44 1986-87 0.02 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.49 0.73 3.42 5.89 5.21 0.79 1.63 0.15 20.51 1987-88 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.19 2.22 5.79 5.42 0.88 0.73 3.15 1.66 0.79 22.83 1988-89 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.07 6.96 4.29 1.45 2.73 10.08 1.41 0.74 0.02 27.80 1989-90 0.00 0.33 3.28 4.30 3.02 0.00 4.75 3.40 2.75 1.66 3.46 0.21 27.16 1990-91 0.00 0.11 0.59 0.41 1.62 1.30 0.40 1.79 16.08 1.74 2.54 1.54 28.12 1991-92 0.17 0.10 0.32 5.54 2.32 3.10 1.97 7.68 4.58 0.45 0.45 1.66 28.34 1992-93 3.26 0.35 0.00 3.05 0.44 9.61 12.19 8.74 6.29 2.07 1.24 2.43 49.67 1993-94 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 2.1 1 1.97 2.93 7.08 0.86 3.71 2.22 0.00 22.13 1994-95 0.00 0.00 0.77 2.82 7.92 3.68 18.32 1.1 4 18.76 6.98 6.72 1.02 68.13 1995-96 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 9.13 10.32 11 .17 6.81 3.94 5.51 1.24 48.52 1996-97 0.05 0.01 0.23 2.55 7.14 16.19 18.16 0.80 0.53 0.82 0.51 1.24 48.23 1997-98 0.17 0.00 0.33 1.39 4.99 3.70 12.86 16.30 6.69 4.94 6.46 1.35 59.18 1998-99 0.00 0.00 2.84 0.49 5.12 3.13 8.93 9.71 2.63 3.03 1.28 1.03 38.19 1999-00 0.00 0.13 0.18 1.05 3.51 0.51 11.68 14.13 2.58 3.70 2.72 1.06 41.25 2000-01 0.00 0.07 0.96 3.17 1.01 1.59 4.69 4.70 3.08 5.39 0.00 0.07 24.73 2001-02 0.02 0.00 0.60 1.17 6.97 9.75 2.56 2.13 6.88 2.29 2.02 0.00 34.39 2002-03 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 7.42 11.17 1.12 3.50 3.81 9.36 2.69 0.00 39.16 2003-04 0.09 1.32 0.06 0.00 2.88 9.97 2.79 8.52 1.07 0.17 0.55 0.02 27.44 2004-05 0.02 0.00 0.19 7.66 2.93 6.67 10.52 6.95 9.35 3.35 5.76 0.80 54.20 2005-06 0.00 0.1 1 0.71 1.70 3.34 17.72 7.75 5.26 10.14 10.55 1.97 0.10 59.35 2006-07 0.08 0.00 0.01 1.53 3.56 5.25 2.08 8.70 1.30 2.61 1.33 0.1 0 26.55 2007-08 0.01 0.17 0.34 1.02 0.95 5.01 10.15 6.69 0.87 0.26 2.85 0.00 28.32 2008-09 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 6.17 5.08 5.88 6.98 6.78 1.97 3.37 0.79 38.67 2009-10 0.00 0.10 0.00 4.37 1.31 5.89 7.97 5.86 4.92 6.66 3.65 0.06 40.79 2010-11 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.67 7.15 14.21 2.15 5.76 15.22 1.94 2.94 3.21 61 .25 2011-12 0.00 0.00 1.56 3.13 1.77 0.00 6.25 1.62 5.96 4.76 0.37 0.92 26.34 2012-13 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.27 5.78 12.56 0.64 0.93 3.26 1.11 1.48 0.80 27.83 2013-14 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.56 1.80 1.22 1.59 9.23 6.17 3.43 0.98 0.05 25.75 2014-15 0.52 0.03 1.03 0.15 3.72 7.25 0.13 4.49 0.43 3.08 2.75 0.80 24.38 2015-16 0.39 0.00 0.11 2.26 5.36 9.74 9.53 1.74 9.19 3.13 1.82 0.34 43.61 2016-17 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.26 3.19 8.30 22.25 20.47 5.49 8.06 0.59 0.46 76.07 2017-18 0.00 0.09 1.44 0.50 7.34 0.42 5.20 0.76 14.50 3.70 1.02 0.00 34.97 2018-1 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.92 8.21 3.07 9.84 15.37 8.97 2.07 7.43 0.46 57.34 2019-20 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.63 Current Year

Average 0.16 0.21 0.73 2.21 4.87 5.92 6.66 6.42 5.83 3.45 1.93 0.65 38.46 2019-20 +/- (0 16) (0.21) (0 10) (2.21) (4.87) (5 92) (6.66) {6.42) (5.83) (3.45) (1 93) (0.65) (37.83)

ANNUAL AVERAGE 38.411

INCHES+/- ANNUAL AVERAGE (37.83) Tri·Dam Project Meeting Date: November21, 2019

To: Board of Directors

From: Susan Larson

Re: Regulatory Affairs/Compliance Report

FERC Compliance

• Continued work on the Beardsley/Donnells 5-year Noxious Weed Plan update. All field work is has been completed, and the draft report has been submitted to the USFS, for the required consultation. Deadline for filing with FERC is December 2019. • Continuing support work on Beardsley A-bay maintenance project. Participated in the final inspection process with DSOD/SMCI and the CondoriTDP/SSJID/OID team. Submitted testing protocol for the Interim Seepage testing DSOD, and submitted the team's grout plan to DSOD and FERC. • Continued work on the Tulloch Rec site proposal, following the Planning Commission's hearing on October 24, 2019. Following up on several issues raised during the public hearing to answer questions of the Planning Department staff so that the project can be rescheduled. • Working with Tri-Dam staff on dam safety inspection follow up for the Part 12d Dam Safety Inspection follow up and ODSP's requirements. • 2019 Inspection follow-up for Donnells, Beardsley and Tulloch following the September 2019 FERC inspections. • Participated in the Emergency Action Plan (EAP) table-top and functional exercise on October 29th at Black Oak Conference Center.

Permit and Other Assignments

• Work on permits, site reviews and compliance questions for various properties at Tulloch. Respond to daily inquiries from the public. Permits, inspections and file documentation. • Work on the Hells Half Acre roadwork project, conversion of the emergency status on the temporary by-pass work done following the storm damage several winters ago. Contract for the cultural resources work is on the November agenda. Working with USFS to further define the scope of the "streamlined environmental document" to meet the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. GENERATION

REPORT Tri-Dam Project Generation & Revenue Report 2019

Donn ells Beardsley Tulloch Project Total Average 2019 Net Avoided 2019 Average 2019 Net Average 2019 Net 2019 Average 2019 Net 2019 2019 Energy Generation Generation Generation Energy Generation Generation Generation Generation Energy Generation Generation Energy Revenue (1958-2018) (kWh) (kWh) Revenue (1958-2018) (kWh) (1958-2018) (kWh) Revenue (1958-2018) (kWh) Revenue JAN 17,389,989 19,834,391 - $1,487,579 3,150,048 3,396,494 $254,737 4,271,885 1,629,522 $122,214 24,811,922 24,860,407 $1,864,531 FEB 17,229,608 25,886,439 - $1,941,483 2,927,753 3,771,366 $282,852 5,024,913 6,531,251 $489,844 25,182,274 36,189,057 $2,714,179 MAR 23,070,659 25,009,389 - $1,875,704 3,584,274 6,261,164 $469,587 7,580,691 17,012,565 $1,275,942 34,235,623 48,283,118 $3,621,234 APR 31,686,865 30,904,052 - $2,317,804 4,717,464 7,716,107 $578,708 10,811,027 16,844,936 $1,263,370 47,215,356 55,465,095 $4,159,882 MAY 41,216,149 27,782,679 15,000,000 $3,208,701 5,799,593 7,725,666 $579,425 12,131,040 17,223,412 $1,291,756 59,146,782 52,731,757 $5,079,882 JUN 42,555,036 28,962,541 (3,849,953) $1,883,444 6,336,073 7,489,378 $561,703 12,084,818 17,148,156 $1,286,112 60,975,928 53,600,074 $3,731,259 JUL 36,444,466 45,160,274 485,440 $3,423,429 6,629,514 8,148,016 $611,101 12,609,174 17,964,699 $1,347,352 55,683,154 71,272,989 $5,381,882 AUG 27,568,740 28,584,181 - $2,143,814 6,269,748 7,762,255 $582,169 11,868,293 16,451,389 $1,233,854 45,706,781 52,797,824 $3,959,837 SEP 20,111,167 23,538,635 - $1,765,398 5,223,523 7,267,572 $545,068 8,577,620 11,173,864 $838,040 33,912,310 41,980,071 $3,148,505 OCT 12,743,535 15,876,887 - $1,190,767 3,752,220 1,170,359 $87,777 4,664,124 9,009,795 $675,735 21,159,879 26,057,041 $1,954,278 NOV 12,042,987 - - $0 2,794,775 - $0 2,487,256 - $0 17,325,019 - $0 DEC 14 354 891 - - $0 3,713,920 - _l;jl 3,288,702 - $0 21,357,513 - $0 Total 296,414,092 271,539,466 11,635,487 $21,238,121 54,898,907 60,708,376 $4 553128 95,399,542 130,989,589 $9,824,219 446,712,540 463,237,432 $35 615 469 May avOided generation IS estimated June avoided generation is estimated with May true-up Note: 2019 Price per MWh is $75.00 July avoided includes June true up 2020 Price per MWh is $78.00 Tri-Dam Power Authority - Sand Bar

Average 2019 Net PG&E 2019 Energy Total Generation Generation Coordination Revenue Revenue (1987-2018) (kWh) Payment JAN 4,663,654 6,043,444 $453,258 $0 $453,258 FEB 3,946,606 6,676,290 $500,722 $0 $500,722 MAR 5,290,014 11,037,070 $827,780 $0 $827,780 APR 6,873,822 11 '180,838 $838,563 $0 $838,563 MAY 8,065,189 10,882,049 $816,154 $0 $816,154 JUN 8,750,023 10,649,370 $798,703 $0 $798,703 JUL 9,133,101 11 ,305,311 $847,898 $0 $847,898 AUG 8,560,581 10,463,771 $784,783 $0 $784,783 SEP 6,928,285 10,983,445 $823,758 $0 $823,758 OCT 4,898,944 1,933,504 $145,013 $0 $145,013 NOV 2,947,604 - $0 $0 $0 DEC 5 554,123 - $0 $0 $0 Total 75,611,948 91,155,091 $6,836,632 $0 $6,836,632 CALIFORNIA ENERGY MARKETS • November 8, 2019 • No. 1564 • Page 4

WESTERN PRICE SURVEY [7] National Natural Gas Inventory Average Peak Power Prices Recovers Thurs., 10/31-Thurs.,11/07 With "near-record injection activity" in the April 1 to Oct. 31 natural gas refill season, the national natu­ 80 ral gas inventory recovered from low levels at the end of the 2018-2019 heating season, according to the 60 U.S. Energy Infonnation Administration. The EIA esti­ 40 mates working natural gas in storage was 3, 724 Bcf by Oct. 31, 16 percent greater than last year at this time. 20 The total amount of natural gas added between April and October is estimated to be 2,569 Bcf-"the second-highest net injected volume for the refill sea­ son ever reported, falling just short of the record level 10/31 11/1 11/4 11/5 11/6 11/7 of 2, 727 Bcf injected during the 2014 refill season," according to the EIA. • • • · Mid-Columbia - coB --NP15

The storage season typically ends Oct. 31, _,._ •SP1 5 - Palo Verde although additions often continue into November. Working natural gas in storage was 3, 729 Bcf as of Nov. 1, the EIA said. This is a net increase of 34 Bcf compared with the previous week. Average Off-Peak Prices Henry Hub gas values tumbled 15 cents in trading to $2.84/MMBtu. Thurs., 10/31 -Thurs., 11/07 Western natural gas prices varied at the end of so Oct. 31 to Nov. 7 trading. El Paso-San Juan Border 40 natural gas added the most value, up 50 cents to $2.48/MMBtu. El Paso-Permian Basin natural gas lost 30 the most, down 30 cents to $1.74/MMBtu. Likewise, peak Western power prices varied. 20 While South of Path 15 gained $10.65 to $34/MWh, Mid-Columbia daytime power prices fell $18.25 to 10

end at $33.35/MWh. 0 ~~-L~~--L-~~~-L~~~ Western nighttime power prices generally lost between $1.70 and as much as $16.70 in trading. 10/31 11/1 11/4 11/5 11/6 11/7 Mid-C dropped the most value, down 38 percent or • • • ·Mid-Columbia - cos $16.70 to $27.65/MWh. Palo Verde was the excep­ tion, gaining $1.7 5 to $34/MWh. Prices ranged --SP15 - Palo Verde from $27.60/MWh at California-Oregon Border to $35.80/MWh at SP15 by Nov. 7. California Independent System Operator demand reached 28,951 MW Nov. 7; however, the week's high Average Natural Gas Prices ($/MMBtu) was forecast to be 29,940 MW Nov. 8. In October, the average high peak price at Th, 10/31 Tue, 11/05 Th, 11/07 Henry Hub was $2.65/MMBtu, 72 cents less than in Henry Hub 2.69 2.76 2.84 2018 (see "Price Trends," next page). Sumas 3.40 3.97 3.44 Western natural gas hub prices dropped between 12 cents and as much as $1.16 compared with the Alberta 2.12 2.20 2.08 year prior. PG&E CityGate shed the most value, losing Malin 2.78 2.79 2.67 $1.16 year over year to reach $3.20/MMBtu in 2019. Opal/Kern 2.87 2.77 2.58 Average Western power p1ices during the month Stanfield 2.80 2.75 2.64 varied in comparison with 2018. Northwest power prices had spiked in 2018 following natural gas PG& E CityGate 3.29 3.45 3.33 import supply disruptions that pushed California­ SoCal Border 2.58 2.91 2.70 Oregon Border to a $110/MWh high and Mid-C SoCal CityGate 3.74 4.40 3.57 to $109.20/MWh. In 2019, the daytime high price dropped by $59.25 and $54.90, respectively. EP-Permian 1.74 0.86 1.44 Other Western hubs added between 35 cents and EP-San Juan 1.98 2.41 2.48 $5.95 year over year. SPlS added the most, up $5.95 Power/gas prices courtesy Enerfax to $56.60/MWh. -Linda Dailey Paulson

Copyright (0 2019, NewsData LLC. Unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited. Ending At Midnight - November 11 , 2019 CURRENT RESERVOIR CONDITIONS

4552 LEGEND 4000 Capacity 353S Historical (TAF ) 3000 3000 Average 2448 2000 2000 2000 % or Capacity I% or Historical Average 1000 1000 1000

0 0 0 Trinity Lake Lake Shasta Lake Oroville Folsom Lake 80% 1123% 71 % 1120% 56% 193% 57% 115%

2420 2000 2030

1000 1000

0 0 New Melones Lake Don Pedro Reservoir 1025 83% 1148% '-----~~~-~~ .;;;.~~!ill 79% 1122% 0 Lake McClure 61 % 1138%

2039

1000

0 San Lu is Reservoir 43% 177% 1000

0 Pine Flat Reservoir Millerton Lake 41 % 1114% 49% 1125%

13! j--t = = t--­ Lake Perris Castaic Lake 68% 187% 82% 1108%

Graph Updated 11/12/201910:48AM FISHBIO ------~F&HBIO ______

1617 S. Yosemite Avenue • Oakdale, CA 95361 • Phone: (209) 847-6300 • Fax: (209) 847-1925

November 8, 2019

Tri Dam Project Jeff Shields P.O. Box 11 58 Pinecrest, CA 95364

Re: October 2019 Invoices

Dear Mr. Shields:

Enclosed are invoices for consulting services provided by FISHBIO during October. Services provided for each project are summarized below.

Li[ecvcle monitoring Weir monitoring continued through October. As ofNovember 5, the Chinook salmon count was 1,406. Redd surveys were also conducted during October to document distribution of spawning. More information regarding lifecycle monitoring activities and results is provided in the enclosed San Joaquin Basin Field Report. Also during October, we followed up on applications submitted during September to renew annual permits issued by NMFS and CDFW for continued lifecycle monitoring activities.

Publications Work continued on the manuscript analyzing the impacts of water temperature on juvenile recruitment during the drought.

Non-Native Investigation/ Predator Study During October we continued reviewing and analyzing data collected during 2019, development of the 2019 repmi, and planning for 2020. Planning activities have included continued coordination with NMFS and CDFW, and providing information for removals of non-native predators to occur in 2020.

Consulting In October we reviewed and provided comments on Draft Biological Goals for the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary Water Quality Control Plan developed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for the Stanislaus River. Our comments were provided to legal counsel and submitted to the SWRCB on October 25. Unfortunately the SWRCB continued to dismiss recommendations from the peer review panel earlier this year for a scientifically robust approach to developing biological goals and tracking progress toward them.

In late October the new Biological Opinion was also released by NMFS, and we have begun reviewing the document. ------~FISHBIO ------

1617 S. Yosemite Avenue • Oakdale, CA 95361 • Phone: (209) 847-6300 • Fax: (209) 847-1925

B ur2ed tS ummarv Life-cycle 2019 MonitorinJ!. Pub/ icat ions ConsultinJ!. Non-natives TOTAL Jan $ 57,554.02 $ 21,505.00 $ 3,345.00 $ 54,543.97 $ 136,947.99 Feb $ 49,249.45 $ 8,730.00 $ I ,375.00 $ 23,349.61 $ 82,704.06 Mar $ 48,331.74 $ 9,200.00 $ 20,257.50 $ 89,084.40 $ 166,873.64 Apr $ 24,185.32 $ 18,365.00 $ 18,776.17 $ 99,184.01 $ 160,510.50 May $ 22,087.49 $ 3,990.00 $ 2,2 10.00 $ 159,006. 16 $ 187,293.65 Jun $ 10,615.88 $ 5,450.00 $ 12,085.00 $ 149,424.02 $ 177,574.90 Jut $ 19,166.64 $ 8,070.00 $ 2,955.00 $ 72,572.02 $ 102,763.66 Aug $ 89,009.77 $ 8,610.00 $ 2,6 15.00 $ 59,344. 16 $ 159,578.93 Sep $ 44,070.47 $ 5,655.00 $ 5,580.00 $ 40,340.00 $ 95,645.47 Oct $ 73 715 .07 $ 4 690.00 $ 12 375.00 $ 18 410.79 $ 109,190.86 TOTAL s 437 985.851 s 94 265.oo I s 81,573.67 I s 765,259.14 $ 1,379,083.66 $ $ Estimated 2019 $ 550 000.00 100 000.00 100 000.00 $1 000,000.00 $ 1,750,000.00 Remaining $ 112 014.15 $ 5 735 .00 $ 18,426.33 $ 234,740.86 $ 370,916.34

Sincerely, ~~ Andrea Fuller ~ FISHBIO

SJB October Field Report

Fall-run Adult Migration Monitoring

A total of 1,048 Chinook salmon were observed in the Stanislaus River during October, increasing the season total to 1,089 (Figme 1). Passage to date at the Stanislaus weir is the lowest number observed since 2009. A total of 620 Chinook salmon were observed in the Tuolumne River, increasing the season total to 699 (Figure 2). Passage to date at the Tuolumne weir is similar to 2017 but less than 50% ofthe number observed in 2016 and 2018. To date, 26% and 9% of all Chinook passing through the Stanislaus and Tuolumne weirs, respectively, have a clipped adipose fin (indicating hatchery origin). As approximately 25% of hatchery production is adipose fm clipped, this suggests that all of the fish migrating into the Stanislaus River are of hatchery origin, but some of the fish migrating into the Tuolumne River thus far were naturally spawned.

The 2019 fall attraction flows began on October 9 on both the Stanislaus and Tuolumne rivers and were shaped to simulate natural run-off events to measme fish response at the two weir locations. The attraction flow period lasted for 25 days (October 9 to November 2) on the Stanislaus River (Figme 3) with peaks ranging from 1,000 cfs to 1,500 cfs while the period lasted only 16 days (October 9-24) on the Tuolumne River (Figure 4) and consisted of peaks ranging from 625 cfs to 1,200 cfs. Passage peaked at 303 Chinook on the Stanislaus River and 133 Chinook on the Tuolumne River. Peak passage at the Tuolumne weir occurred immediately following the first pulse (October 10) and at the Stanislaus weir during the third pulse (October 25).

Some Chinook spawning was observed on both the Stanislaus and Tuolumne rivers during October, but redd surveys were limited on both rivers due to high pulse flows. We expect that spawning has been delayed by the pulse flows and will pick up once flows are reduced. A Tuolumne River redd smvey was conducted on October 21-22 as flows began to recede and approximately 60 redds were marked.

Escapement to the Mokelumne River is on track for another stellar year with 9,976 Chinook salmon migrating past the Woodbridge Dam as of October 31 (Figure 5). The season total for 2018 was an impressive 17,427 Chinook which was down from the record high of 19,828 in 2017. The first of a series of pulse flows on the Mokelumne River occurred three weeks prior to the start of the Stanislaus and Tuolumne river fall migration pulse flows.

A video recording system was installed on November 4 just above the Bellota weir fish ladder in Mormon Slough to document upstream passages of Chinook and 0. mykiss ascending the fish ladder. The same system was used in 2017 and 2018, and we positively identified 62 Chinook and one female ad-clipped adult 0. mykiss in 2017 and 298 Chinook and six adult 0. mykiss (1 ad-clipped) in 2018.

1 ~ FISHBIO

Cumulative Chinook Passage at the Stanislaus River Weir 15,000 c 0 E 12,000 ii 1/1 .¥ 9,000 0 c0 :.c 6,000 ....u 0 z0 3,000

o +-~~----~---.~~~~~----~----~--~-- 25-Aug 9-Sep 24-Sep 9-0ct 24-0ct 8-Nov 23-Nov 8-Dec 23-Dec

2014 - 2015 - 2016 - 2017 - 2018 -2019

Figure I. Cumulative Chinook salmon passage at the Stanislaus River weir, 2013-2019.

4,000 Cumulative Chinook Passage at the Tuolumne River Weir

c 0 E 'i 3,000 1/1 .¥ 0 0 c 2,000 .c u.... 0 0 z 1,000

0 1-Sep 16-Sep 1-0ct 16-0ct 31-0ct 15-Nov 30-Nov 15-Dec 30-Dec

- 2014 - 2015 2016 - 2017 - 2018 -2019

Figure 2. Cumulative Chinook salmon passage at the Tuolumne River weir, 2013-2019.

2 ~ FISHBIO

2019 Chinook Passage and Stanislaus River Flow 400 2,000

Q) C) 300 1,500 ns en en -.... en u ns a. -~ 200 1,000 0 ~ LL cns 100 500

Q +------,------~----~~--~~~~~~LU~~~~L+ Q 29-Aug 7-Sep 16-Sep 25-Sep 4-0ct 13-0ct 22-0ct 31-0ct

- GDW -RIP Figure 3. Daily Chinook salmon passage at the Stanislaus River weir and river flow at Goodwin (GDW) and Ripon (RIP).

2019 Chinook Passage and Tuolumne River Flow 200 2,000

Q) 150 1,500 C) ns en -.!!! en u ns 100 1,000 0.. -~ ..2 ·a;~ u. c 50 500

0 0 1-Sep 13-Sep 25-Sep 7-0ct 19-0ct 31-0ct

LGN - MOD

Figure 4. Daily Chinook salmon passage at the Tuolumne River weir and river flow at La Grange (LGN) and Modesto (MOD).

3 ~ FISHBIO

20,000

c 0 ~ 15,000 U) .¥ 0 0 c :c 10,000 0 -0 0 z 5,000

0 ~----~----~~~.2~~--~----~------~ 1-Aug 26-Aug 20-Sep 15-0ct 9-Nov 4-Dec 29-Dec - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016 - 2017 - 2018 -2019

Figure 5. Cumulative Chinook salmon passage at the Mokelumne River fish ladder, 2013-2019.

Juvenile Outmigration Monitoring

Calaveras River rotary screw trap (RST) began on November 4. The trap will sample during the week and will be raised on the weekends from now through early to mid­ summer. Last season, 568 0. mykiss (41 YOY, 516 Age 1+, and 11 adult) were captured in the Calaveras RST, which was similar to the number captured the previous year. Additionally, 4,718 juvenile Chinook salmon were captured in 2019, which was the second consecutive year more than 4,500 juvenile Chinook were captured in the Calaveras River RST.

Native Fish Plan

A total of 39 individual fish (15 hardhead, 1 largemouth bass, 3 Sacramento pikeminnow, 9 smallmouth bass, 3 spotted bass, 7 striped bass, and 1 unknown) were detected at the Stanislaus River weir between October 1-31. Several of the individuals were detected on multiple dates over the month. Four of the smallmouth bass were originally captured and tagged in June 2018, and three out ofthe four of them migrated upstream 10-20 miles from the initial location of capture.

4 ~ FISHBIO

Table 1. Detection of PIT tagged predator species at the Stanislaus River weir.

Tagging Tagging Species FisbCode Location Detection Date Date (RM) Hard head NFP-20 19-1 580 6/18/ 19 35.4 I 0/ 10/19 Hard head NFP-20 19-1428 6/20/ 19 19.2 1011 1/19, 10/ 17/ 19 Hard head NFP-2019-316 4/29/ 19 30.9 10/11 / 19 Hard head NFP-2019-709 6/3/ 19 36.2 10/ 11 / 19 Hardhead NFP-2019-1608 6/ 19119 32. 1 10/12/ 19 Hardhead NFP-20 19-811 6/4/ 19 35.2 10/ 12/ 19 Hardhead NFP-20 19-13 3/8119 2l.l 10/13/19 Hardhead NFP-2019-1 491 6/21119 19.4 10/17/ 19 Hardhead NFP-20 19-1353 6/19/19 31.5 I 0/22/ 19, I 0/24/ 19, I 0/31/ 19 Hardhead NFP-20 19-1341 6/19/19 32.1 10/23/ 19 Hardhead NFP-20 19-858 6/6/19 30.9 10/26/19 Hardhead NFP-20 19-1598 6/19/ 19 32.4 10/28/19 Hardhead NFP-2019-1614 6/19/19 31.7 10/28/19 Hardhead NFP-2019-261 411119 31.9 10/28119 Hardhead NFP-20 19-905 6/7/19 3 1.9 10/28/19

Largemouth bass NFP-2019-495 5130119 18.3 10113119

Sacramento pikeminnow NFP-20 19-1423 6/20/19 19.4 10/ 17/ 19 Sacramento pikeminnow NFP-20 19-793 6/4119 36.2 10/20/ 19 Sacramento pikeminnow NFP-20 19-850 616119 31.9 I 0128/ 19

Smallmouth bass NFP-20 19-1522 6118/19 38.0 10/31 19 10/16/ 19, 10119/19 Smallmouth bass NFP-20 18- 172 6/7/18 21.8 I0 15119 ,_ I 0/11/19 Smallmouth bass NFP-20 18-26 6/5118 14.9 10113119 Smallmouth bass NFP-20 19-1 354 6119119 31.5 10114119 Smalhnouth bass NFP-2019- 1345 6119119 31.9 I 0/19119 Smallmouth bass NFP-20 18-1 27 6/718 33.7 10/19119 Smallmouth bass NFP-20 18-42 6/5/18 11.9 I 0124119 Smallmouth bass NFP-2019-1619 6119/19 31.5 I 0124119 Smallmouth bass NFP-2019-1610 6/19/19 32. 1 I 0126/ 19

Spotted bass NFP-2019-1 287 6/18119 35.8 I 0/11 I 19 I 01 17I I 9 I 01I 81I 9 Spotted bass NFP-2019-1 346 6/19119 31.9 10118/19 10119/19 Spotted bass NFP-2019- 1627 6119119 31.5 I 0123/19

Striped bass NFP-2019- 1533 6/18119 36.4 10/ 10/19, 10/26/ 19, 10131 / 19 Striped bass NFP-20 19-1534 6/ 18119 36.4 10/1/ 19 I0 /3/19-10/8/19 10/1/19-10/3119, 10/6119, Striped bass NFP-20 19-1646 6/ 19119 30.9 10/7/19, I 0110/19-10112119 Striped bass NFP-20 19-328 4/29/ 19 33.0 I 0/1/19-10110/19 Striped bass NFP-20 19-365 5/2/19 38.4 10/6119, I 0/23/ 19, I 0126119 Striped bass NFP-20 19-373 513/ 19 26.7 1016/19-1 0/8/19 I0113119 Striped bass NFP-20 19-935 6/10119 29.8 I0 15119-1019119

5 CLOSED

SESSION Notes: TRI-DAM

POWER

AUTHORITY REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY of THE OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and THE SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT NOVEMBER 21, 2019 Start time is immediately following the Tri-Dam Project meeting which begins at 9:00AM

CALL TO ORDER: Oakdale Irrigation District 1205 East F Street Oakdale, CA 95361 ROLL CALL: . John Holbrook, Bob Holmes, Dave Kamper, Ralph Roos, Mike Weststeyn Gail Altieri, Brad DeBoer, Hennan Doornenbal, Tom Orvis, Linda Santos

PUBLIC COMMENT: The Joint Board of Commissioners' encourages public participation at Board meetings. Matters affecting the operation of the Tri-Dam Power Authority and under the jurisdiction of the Joint Districts and not posted on the Agenda may be addressed by the public, and limited to 5 minutes per person. California law prohibits the Board from taking action on any matter that is not on the posted Agenda unless the Board determines that it is a situation specified in Government Code Subsection 54954.2.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1-4

Matters listed under the consent calendar are considered routine and will be acted upon under one motion. There will be no discussion ofthese items unless a request is made to the Board President by a Director or member of the public. Those items will be considered at the end of the consent items.

I. Discussion and possible action to approve the regular board meeting minutes of October 17,2019.

2. Discussion and possible action to approve October 2019 financial statements & statement of obligations.

3. Discussion and possible action to approve Resolution TDPA 2019.05 Elect New Secretary and General Manager

4. Discussion and possible action to approve Resolution TDPA 2019.06 Authorization for Maintenance of Deposit Accounts ACTION CALENDAR ITEMS

5. Discussion and possible action to approve 2020 draft budget

ADJOURNMENT ITEM6 6. Adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meeting.

D Items on the Agenda may be taken in any order. D Action may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. D Writings relating to an open session agenda item that are distributed to members of the Board of Commissioners will be available for inspection at the Authority office, excluding writings that are not public records or are exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act.s. 0 ADA Compliance Statement: In compliance with the Americans with Disability Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Clerk at (209) 965~3996 ext. 110. Notification 48 hours prior to meeting will enable the Authority to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. MEETING

MINUTES TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING October 17,2019 Manteca, California The Commissioners of the Tri-Dam Power Authority met at the offices of the South San Joaquin Irrigation District located in Manteca, California, on the above date for conducting business of the Tri-Dam Power Authority, pursuant to the resolution adopted on October 14, 1984. President DeBoer called the meeting to order at 10:35 a.m. COMMISSIONERS PRl:SENf;, OlD COMMISSIONERS HERMAN DOORNENBAL GAIL ALTIERI BRAD DeBOER LINDA SANTOS

ALSO PRESENT:

Jeff Shields, Interim r;:,,n,r:o~l D()(Jge, Finance Manager, Tri­ Dam Project; Project; Susan Larson, Compliance Coordin Belitz, DnArR,Ii011R Supervisor, Tri-Dam Project; Mia B I, General Manager, OlD; Peter Rietkerk, General Manager,

ITEM #1 Board Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019.

ACTION CALENDAR

ITEM #2 Approval of September and quarterly year-to-date financial statements and statement of obligations.

Finance Manager Dodge presented the financial statements for the month and quarter ending September 30, 2019.

Page 1 TDPA October 17, 2019 Commissioner Roos moved to approve the September financial statements and statement of obligations as presented. Commissioner Altieri seconded the motion. The motion passed OlD 4-0, SSJID 4-0.

ADJOURNMENT

President DeBoer adjourned the meeting at 10:40 a.m.

The next Board of Commissioners meeting will be November 21, 2019 at the offices of Oakdale Irrigation District, Oakdale, California immediately following the Tri-Dam Project meeting, which commences at 9:00a.m.

ATTEST:

Jeff Shields Interim Secretary Tri-Dam Power Authority

Page2 TDPA October 17,2019 FINANCIAL

MATTERS Tri-Dam Power Authority Balance Sheets (unaudited)

October 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 October 31, 2018 1 Assets 2 Cash $ 7,266,714 $ 6,442,723 $ 5,367,311 3 Short-Term Investments 1,067,368 1,060,833 1,041,235 4 Accounts Receivable 145,013 823,758 116,607 5 Prepaid Expenses 79,058 90,352 57,835 6 Capital Assets 45,327,371 45,327,371 45,330,766 7 Accumulated Depreciation (21 ,511 ,654) (21 ,470,062) (21,011,461) 8 Intangible Assets 9 Other Assets 2 214 6,806 1,493 10 Total Assets 32 376 084 32,281 781 30 903 785 11 12 13 Liabilities 14 Accounts Payable 624,597 550,554 105,987 15 Other Current Liabilities 2,942 2,942 2,304 16 Long-Term Liabilities 22,707 22,707 17 Total Liabilities 650,246 576,203 108,291 18 19 Net Position 20 Net Position- Beginning of Year 30,358,720 30,358,720 33,820,203 21 Additional Paid in Capital 385,873 385,873 385,873 22 Distributions (4,868,000) (4,868,000) (7,383,000) 23 YTD Net Revenues 5,849,245 5,828,984 3,972,418 24 Total Net Position 31,725,838 31 705,578 30,795,494 25 26 27 Total Liabilities and Net Position $ 32 376 084 $ 32,281,781 $ 30 903,785 Tri-Dam Power Authority Statement of Revenues and Expenses Month Ending October 31, 2019

Percent of Current YTD YTD YTD Budget 2019 2019 Budget Month Actual Budget Variance Budget Remaining Operating Revenues 2 Power Sales $ 145,013 $ 6,842,332 $ 4,766,718 $ 2,075,615 $ 5,720,061 -20% 3 Other Operating Revenue (3,395) (3,395) NA 4 Total Operating Revenues 145,013 6,838,937 4,766,718 2,072,219 5,720,061 -20% 5 6 Operating Expenses 7 Salaries and Wages 55,980 272,911 278,540 (5,629) 334,248 18% 8 Benefits and Overhead 16,063 109,488 198,515 (89,027) 238,218 54% 9 Operations 648 11 ,334 11,500 (166) 13,800 18% 10 Maintenance 3,364 42,131 284,167 (242,035) 341,000 88% 11 General & Administrative 11,374 172,044 187,333 (15,289) 224,800 23% 12 Depreciation & Amortization 41,591 416,307 425,000 (8,693) 510,000 18% 13 Total Operating Expenses 129,020 1,024,215 1,385,055 (360,840) 1,662,066 38% 14 15 Net Income From Operations 15,993 5,814,722 3,381,663 2,433,059 4,057,995 43% 16 17 Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 18 Investment Earnings 4,268 34,523 33,333 1,189 40,000 14% 19 Interest Expense NA 22 Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 4,268 34,523 33,333 1 '189 40,000 14% 23 24 Net Revenues $ 20,260 $ 5,849,245 $ 3,414,996 $ 2,434,249 $ 4,097,995 -43% 25 26 27 Memo: 28 Capital Expenditures $ $ $ 82,917 $ (82,917) $ 99,500 100% General Ledger Expense vs Budget with Encumbrances by Fund

User: rdodge Printed: 11/7/2019 7:46:51 AM Period 10- 10 Fiscal Year 2019 ~~-~:AM_PROJ~C! . ~~-~-----

Fund Description Budget PeriodAmt EndBal Variance Encumbered Available %Available

2 Operations 2 Electric Expense Labor 197,416.00 24,591.56 153,469.56 43,946.44 0.00 43,946.44 22.26 2 Electric Expense OH 136,832.00 6,488.50 56,250.58 80,581.42 0.00 80,581.42 58.89 2 Powerhouse Supplies 800.00 66.11 341.93 458.07 0.00 458.07 57.26 2 Furnishings & Misc. Equipment 800.00 0.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 800.00 100.00 2 Powerhouse Utilities 6,000.00 582.28 4,722.07 1,277.93 80.14 1,197.80 19.96 2 Streamgaging 6,200.00 0.00 6,270.00 ·70.00 0.00 -70.00 -1.13 2 Depreciation 510,000.00 41,591.10 416,306.97 93,693.03 0.00 93,693.03 18.37 2 Operations 858,048.00 73,319.55 637,361.11 220,686.89 80.14 220,606.76 25.71 2 Maintenance 2 Comms & Security Labor 138,340.00 25,212.00 79,450.95 58,889.05 0.00 58,889.05 42.57 2 Cornms & Security OH 99,878.00 6,978.09 33,074.30 66,803.70 0.00 66,803.70 66.89 2 Safety Supplies 2,500.00 13.89 79.89 2,420.11 0.00 2,420.11 96.80 2 Maint & Repairs to Facility 100,000.00 266.53 874.53 99,125.47 1,138.67 97,986.80 97.99 2 Maint & Repairs to Plant 70,000.00 518.92 12,613.44 57,386.56 1,767.74 55,618.82 79.46 2 Electronic Expense 5,000.00 564.46 718.03 4,281.97 0.00 4,281.97 85.64 2 Mise Hydro Expense 500.00 0.00 1,619.05 ·1,119.05 0.00 ·1,119.05 -223.81 2 Computedvlicro Repair Replace 2,500.00 0.00 1,044.63 1,455.37 0.00 1,455.37 58.21 2 Power Line Repair & Maintenanc !00,000.00 0.00 771.99 99.228.01 0.00 99,228.01 99.23 2 Communications & Security 2,500.00 0.00 3,709.77 ·1,209.77 4,344.70 -5,554.47 ·222.18 2 Routine Road Maintenance 30,000.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 100.00 2 Shop Supplies 500.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 100.00 2 Equipment Rental TDP 24,000.00 2,000.00 20,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 16.67 2 Fuel and Fuel Tax 3,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 100.00 2 Equipment Operation & Maintena 500.00 0.00 700.00 -200.00 0.00 -200.00 40.00 2 Maintenance 579,218.00 35,553.89 154,656.58 424,561.42 7,251.11 417,310.31 72.05 2 Administrative 2 Administrative Labor 0.00 6,176.17 39,990.31 -39,990.31 0.00 ·39,990.31 0.00 2 Administrative OH 0.00 2.596.38 20,162.87 -20,162.87 0.00 -20,162.87 0.00 2 Office Expense 500.00 0.00 174.00 326.00 0.00 326.00 65.20 2 APPA & NHA Dues 7,300.00 0.00 7,331.26 -31.26 0.00 -31.26 -0.43 2 Legal Fees General Matters 20,000.00 80.00 5,360.00 14,640.00 0.00 14,640.00 73.20 2 Auditing Services 10,500.00 0.00 9,686.00 814.00 827.00 -13.00 -0.12 2 Engineering Consulting 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 7,950.00 7,050.00 47.00 2 Haz Mat Business Plan 0.00 0.00 486.75 -486.75 0.00 -486.75 0.00 2 Liability & Property Insurance 109,000.00 11.293.99 97,780.83 11,219.17 0.00 11,219.17 10.29

GL. Expense vs Budget with Encumbrances by Fund (11/07/2019- 07:46AM) Page 1 Fund Description Budget PeriodAmt EndBal Variance Encumbered Available %Available

2 Property and Use Taxes 500.00 0.00 128.00 372.00 0.00 372.00 74.40 2 FERC Admin & Land Fees 29,000.00 0.00 17,868.07 11,131.93 0.00 11,131.93 38.39 2 USPS Campground Fee 33,000.00 0.00 33,229.00 -229.00 0.00 -229.00 -0.69 2 Administrative 224,800.00 20,146.54 232,197.09 -7,397.09 8,777.00 -16,174.09 -7.19 2 Capital Exp Fixed Asset 2 Repl Trans Line Caution Balls 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 100.00 2 Rep!DVR 9,500.00 0.00 0.00 9,500.00 0.00 9,500.00 100.00 2 Fire Suppression System 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 100.00 2 150kW Station Generator 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 60,000.00 100.00 2 Capital Exp Fixed Asset 99,500.00 0.00 0.00 99,500.00 0.00 99,500.00 100.00 Expense I, 761,566.00 129,019.98 1,024,214. 78 737,351.22 16,108.24 721,242.98 0.4094 Total 2 Tri Dam Power Authority 1,761,566.00 129,019.98 1,024,214.78 737,351.22 16,108.24 721,242.98 40.94 Expense 1,761,566.00 129,019.98 1,024,214.78 737,351.22 16,108.24 721,242.98 0.4094 Total

GL- Expense vs Budget with Encumbrances by Fund (11/07/2019- 07:46AM) Page2 Tri-Dam Power Authority Cash Flow 2019

Power Other Cash Monthly Net YTD Net Cash Month Sales Receipts Outflow Cash Flow Flow Jan $ 185,528 $ 7,712 $ 4,876,446 $ (4,683,207) $ (4,683,207) Feb 453,258 247 2,144 451,361 (4,231,846) Mar 500,722 443 13,831 487,335 (3,744,511) Apr 827,780 7,214 34,223 800,772 (2,943,740) May 838,563 964 1,579 837,949 (2,105,791) June 816,154 1 '160 4,877 812,437 (1 ,293,354) July 798,703 8,232 4,421 802,513 (490,841) Aug 847,898 1,799 15,006 834,691 343,850 Sept 784,783 1,970 17,033 769,721 1,113,571 Oct 823,758 8,859 2,092 830,525 1,944,096 Nov 1,944,096 Dec 1,944,096

Total $ 6,877,147 $ 38,601 $ 4,971,652 $ 1,944,096

Budget $ 5,720,061 $ 40,000 $ 1,251,566 $ 4,508,495

Budget $ Debt Payments (P&I) 1,152,066 O&M Payments 99,500 Capital Payments $ 1,251,566 Tri-Dam Power Authority

Statement of Obligations

October 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019 TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF OBLIGATIONS

Period Covered October 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019

Total Obligations: 6 checks in the amount of ==~$;;;2!,;,0;;;9;;;2;;.1;;9;, (See attached Vendor Check Register Report)

CERTIFICATION

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

Tom D. Orvis John Holbrook

Gail Altieri Robert A. Holmes

Linda Santos Dave Kamper

Herman Doornenbal Ralph Roos

Brad DeBoer Mike Weststeyn

To: Peter Rietkerk, SSJID General Manager:

THE UNDERSIGNED, EACH FOR HIMSELF, CERTIFIES THAT HE IS PRESIDENT OR SECRETARY OF THE TRJ­ DAM POWER AUTHORITY; THAT THE AMOUNTS DESIGNATED ABOVE HAVE BEEN ACTUALLY, AND NECESSARILY AND PROPERLY EXPENDED OR INCURRED AS AN OBLIGATION OF THE TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY FOR WORK PERFORMED OR MATERIALS FURNISHED FOR OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SAND BAR PROJECT; THAT WARRANTS FOR PAYMENT OF SAID AMOUNTS I-lAVE BEEN DRAWN ON THE SAND BAR PROJECT 0 & M CHECKING ACCOUNT AT OAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK, SONORA, CALIFORNIA.

TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY PRESIDENT, SECRETARY,

Brad DeBoer, President Date Jeff Shields, Interim General Manager Date Secretary Authority October Checks by Amount

Checl< Vendor No Vendor Date Description Amount

208043 10366 Hydraulic Controls Inc. 10/21/2019 673.96 208045 I 0516 Pacific Gas & Electric Co. I 0/25/2019 582.28 208040 I 0225 Debco Automotive Supply Inc. I 0/07/2019 564.46 208042 10225 Debco Automotive Supply Inc. 10/21/2019 111.49 208041 10501 O'Laughlin & Paris 10/17/2019 80.00 208044 I 0900 Chase Cardmember Service I 0/25/2019 80.00

Rep011 Total: $ 2,092.19 RESOLUTION TDPA 2019.05

ELECT NEVV SECRETARY AND GENERAL MANAGER TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. TDPA 2019.05

RESOLUTION ELECTING NEW SECRETARY AND GENERAL MANAGER

WHEREAS, the appointment of a new Secretary and General Manager is necessary to replace the departing General Manager and Secretary, Ron Berry, and the interim General Manager and Secretary, Jeff Shields; and,

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the appointment of Jarom Zimmerman as General Manager, effective December 2, 2019 is hereby confirmed;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jarom Zimmerman is hereby appointed Secretary, effective December 2, 2019;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jarom Zimmerman, General Manager and Secretary is now acting and is qualified to sign checks, deposits, written instructions, consents, stock certificates or other securities, on behalf of the Tri-Dam Power Authority, that the specimen signature appearing opposite his name and title is his genuine signature and that said resolution appointing this officer is in full force and effect, and that such appointment shall remain in effect until rescinded;

BE IT FURHTER RESOLVED, that as such Secretary, he shall. have the following duties:

1. Act in the capacity of Secretary in all matters pertaining to the Tri-Dam Power Authority and handle appropriate and related correspondence and other pertinent matters. 2. Accumulate, file and store all records and invoices and have all invoices properly audited and checked and certified for payment. 3. Prepare vouchers and warrants to be presented to the Joint Board for approval. 4. Execute on behalf of the Joint Board all certificates and other necessary documents related to the Tri-Dam Power Authority, 5. Supervise the installation of an adequate and uniform accounting system and adequate and uniform record of all financial transactions in connection with the Tri-Dam Power Authority. 6. Do and perform all other acts and duties as may be designated from time to time by the Joint Board.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Jarom Zimmerman, General Manager, is hereby designated to sign checks drawn against funds on deposit with Oak Valley Community Bank, and that such designation shall remain in effect until rescinded.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the foregoing signature authority granted to Jarom Zimmerman is subject to any Authority resolution or agreement that requires more than one signature of the Authority, including the signature of an officer named in resolution TDPA 2019.06, to be effective.

General Manager and Secretary: Jarom Zimmerman Signature ______PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of November 2019, by the Commissioners of the Tri-Dam Power Authority by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT: TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY

Dave Kamper, President

Jeff Shields, Interim Secretary RESOLUTION TDPA 2019.06

AUTHORIZATION FOR MAINTENANCE OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. TDPA 2019.06 Oakdale Irrigation District South San Joaquin Irrigation District

AUTHORIZATION FOR MAINTENANCE OF BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS

WHEREAS, the Commissioners of said Tri-Dam Power Authority desires that specific persons be authorized to sign checks;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the persons designated to sign checks on the checking account, effective December 2, 2019, together with their respective titles, are as follows:

BANK: Oak Valley Community Bank California Local Agency Investment Fund US Bank

CHECK SIGNATORIES:

Jarom Zimmerman, General Manager, Tri-Dam Project Rick Dodge, Finance & Administration Manager, Tri-Dam Project Steve Knell, General Manager, Oakdale Irrigation District Peter M. Rietkerk, General Manager, South San Joaquin Irrigation District Sharon Cisneros, Chief Financial Officer, Oakdale Irrigation District Bere Lindley, Asst. General Manager, South San Joaquin Irrigation District

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that two signatures from the "CHECK SIGNATORIES" listed above are required on checks.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of November 2019 by the following vote.

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT S. SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

TRI DAM POWER AUTHORITY

Brad DeBoer, President

John Holbrook, Vice President

Jeff Shields, Interim Secretary 2020

DRAFT BUDGET

. Tri-Dam Power Authority 2020 Budget

. - ~ TRI·PAM PROJECT. ' - --- -·- _:_;

2017 2018 2019 2020 Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget Estimated Budget 1 Revenue 2 Sale of Energy & Capacity $ 9,075,847 $ 8,387,333 $ 5,344,704 $ 5,133,607 $ 5,720,061 $ 7,627,132 $ 5,897,732 3 Other Revenue 15,000 26,365 30,000 35,771 40,000 35,456 40,000 4 Total Revenue $ 9,090,847 $ 8,413,697 $ 5,374,704 $ 5,169,378 $ 5,760,061 $ 7,662,588 $ 5,937,732 5 6 Expense 7 Payroll - Operations & Administrative $ 312,270 $ 274,156 $ 328,428 $ 273,729 $ 334,248 $ 386,530 $ 360,871 8 Payroll - Maintenance 170,489 210,147 219,609 213,869 238,218 160,800 243,762 9 Labor & Overhead Expense 482,759 484,303 548,037 487,597 572,466 547,330 604,633 10 11 Operations & Administration 295,979 206,763 289,867 198,272 238,600 219,077 256,730 12 Maintenance 253,000 47,601 279,500 58,670 341 ,000 76,176 248,000 13 Depreciation 510,000 508,139 510,000 503,322 510,000 499,289 500,000 14 Operating Expense 1,058,979 762,503 1,079,367 760,263 1,089,600 794,542 1,004,730 15 16 Interest Expense ------17 Capital Expense 186,000 10,847 194,500 - 99,500 - 142,000 10 19 Total Expense $ 1,727,738 $ 1,257,653 $ 1,821,904 $ 1,247,861 $ 1,761 ,566 $ 1,341,872 $ 1,751,363 LU 21 Net Income - including Capital I$ 7,363,1 09 1 $ 7,156,044 1 1$ 3,552,8oo 1 $ 3,921 ,518 1 1$ 3,998,495 1 $ 6,320,716 1 1$ 4,186,369 1 LL 23 Net Income -excluding Capital I$ 7,549,109 1 $ 7,166,892 1 I$ 3,747,3oo 1 $ 3,921,518 1 I$ 4,097,995 1 $ 6,320,716 1 1$ 4,328,369 1

Historical generation - KWh 75,611 ,948 % of historical 100% 2019 estimated gen- KWh 75,611 ,948 Price I MWh $ 78.00 Generation revenue $ 5,897,732 Coordination payments Total energy revenue $ • 5,897,732

11 /14/2019 12:28 PM DRAFT Tri-Dam Power Authority 2020 Budget

Jan to Oct 2019 Nov- Dec 2019 Estimated Acct No. Line Item 2019 Budget 2020 Budget Actual Estimated Expense

1 OPERATIONS 2 53940141 Powerhouse Supplies I Furnishings 1,600 342 100 442 1,600 3 53970 Powerhouse Utilities 6,000 4,722 2,064 6,786 6,000 4 59640 Streamgaging 6,200 6,270 0 6,270 6,330 5 TOTAL OPERATIONS EXPENSE 13,800 11,334 2,164 13,498 13,930 0 7 MAINTENANCE 8 53950 Safety Supplies 2,500 80 0 80 2,500 9 54330 Maintenance & Repairs to Facilities 100,000 875 4,000 4,875 10,000 10 54430 Maintenance & Repairs to Plant 70,000 12,613 9,345 21 ,958 70,000 11 54450 Annual Generator Testing 0 0 0 0 0 12 54460 Electrical & Electronic Expense 5,000 718 5,200 5,918 5,000 13 54540 Site improvement 0 0 0 0 0 14 54810 Routine Road Maintenance 30 ,000 0 10,000 10,000 30,000 15 54550 Misc. hydro expenses 500 1,619 500 2,119 500 16 54560 Microwave I computer repair & replace 2,500 1,045 0 1,045 2,500 17 59770 Fuel & Fuel Tax 3,000 0 0 0 0 18 54630 Power line maintenancelveg removal 100,000 772 2,400 3,172 100,000 19 54730 Communications Systems 2,500 3,710 500 4,210 2,500 20 59740 Shop supplies 500 0 100 100 500 21 59755 Equipment rent from Project 24,000 20,000 2,000 22 ,000 24,000 22 59790 Equipment operation & maintenance 500 700 0 700 500 23 TOTAL MAINTENANCE EXPENSE 341,000 42,131 34,045 76,176 248,000 L'+ 25 ADMINISTRATION 26 59210 Office expense 500 174 100 274 500 27 59215 APPA & NHA dues 7,300 7,331 0 7,331 7,550 28 59310 Legal fees 20,000 5,360 500 5,860 20,000 29 59320 Investment Custodial Fees 0 0 0 0 0 30 59331 Auditor services 10,500 9,686 827 10,513 10,750 31 59363 Reliability I Engineering Consulting 15,000 0 9,420 9,420 10,000 32 59365 General Consulting 0 0 0 0 0 33 59375 Has Mat Business Plan 0 487 0 487 500 33 59410 Insurance premiums 109,000 97,781 22,588 120,369 136,000

DRAFT Tri-Dam Power Authority 2020 Budget

Jan to Oct 2019 Nov- Dec 2019 Estimated Acct No. Line Item 2019 Budget 2020 Budget Actual Estimated Expense

34 59430 Property & Use Taxes 500 128 100 228 500 35 59620 FERC license fees 29,000 17,868 0 17,868 23,000 36 59630 USFS Sandbar Collection Agreement 33,000 33, 229 0 33,229 34,000 37 60000 Depreciation Expense 510,000 416,307 82,982 499,289 500,000 38 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE 734,800 588,351 116,517 704,868 742,800 39 40 TOTAL OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE & ADMIN 1,089,600 641,816 152,726 794,542 1,004,730 '+I 42 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 43 Upgrade DVRs - SPH & intake 9,500 0 0 0 19,000 44 HMI touch screen for exciter 0 0 0 0 33,000 45 Repair I replace transmission line caution balls 15,000 0 0 0 15,000 46 Upgrade C02 fire suppression system 15,000 0 0 0 15,000 47 150kW Station Generator 60,000 0 0 0 60,000 48 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENSE 99 ,500 0 0 0 142,000 '+::I 50 LABOR & OVERHEAD 51 53510 Payroll - operations & administration 197,416 193,460 41 ,770 235,230 212,124 52 53510 Payroll - maintenance 138,340 79,451 17,154 96,605 140,017 53 53520 Payroll overhead - operations & admin 136,832 76,413 74,887 151,300 148,747 54 53520 Payroll overhead - maintenance 99,878 33,074 31 ,120 64,195 103,745 55 TOTAL LABOR & OVERHEAD 572,466 382,399 164,931 547,330 604,633 56 57 Contingent expense not included in budget: $75,000 surge shaft repair

11/14/19 12:28 PM

DRAFT